SMITH v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 13-6323.

SMITH ET AL. v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ET AL., Section: "J" (5).

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

February 11, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miriam P. Smith, Plaintiff, represented by Jeffrey A. O'Connell , Nemeroff Law Firm, Amanda Jones Ballay , Landry, Swarr & Cannella, LLC, Christopher B. Norris , Nemeroff Law Firm, David Ryan Cannella , Cannella Law Firm, LLC, Frank J. Swarr , Landry & Swarr, LLC, Mickey P. Landry , Landry & Swarr, LLC, Philip C Hoffman , Landry & Swarr, LLC, Rick Nemeroff , Nemeroff Law Firm & Roderick S. Marshall , Nemeroff Law Firm.

Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by Deborah DeRoche Kuchler , Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, LLC, Ernest G. Foundas , Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, LLC, Francis Xavier deBlanc, III , Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, LLC, McGready Lewis Richeson , Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, LLC, Melissa M. Desormeaux , Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, LLC, Michael H. Abraham , Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, LLC, Milele N. St. Julien , Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, LLC & R. Scott Masterson , Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, LLP.

Dow Chemical Company, Defendant, represented by David Mark Bienvenu, Jr. , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC, John Allain Viator , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC, Lexi T. Holinga , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC & Tam Catherine Bourgeois , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC.

Ethyl Corporation, Defendant, represented by David Mark Bienvenu, Jr. , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC, John Allain Viator , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC, Lexi T. Holinga , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC & Tam Catherine Bourgeois , Bienvenu, Bonnecaze, Foco, Viator & Holinga, APLLC.


ORDER & REASONS

CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion in Limine (Rec. Doc. 63) filed by Plaintiff Miriam P. Smith, Defendant Union Carbide Corporation (Union Carbide)'s opposition thereto (Rec. Doc. 82), and Plaintiff's reply. (Rec. Doc. 106) Having considered the parties' submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds, for the reasons expressed below, that the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases