Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Home Office spent £370,000 settling Patel bullying claim by top civil servant

Sir Philip Rutnam accused Ms Patel of a ‘vicious and orchestrated’ briefing campaign against him

Flora Thompson
Friday 09 July 2021 09:58 BST
Comments
Sir Philip Rutnam accepted the six-figure sum earlier this year after launching legal action against the Home Secretary
Sir Philip Rutnam accepted the six-figure sum earlier this year after launching legal action against the Home Secretary (PA)

The Home Office spent more than £370,000 to settle a top civil servant’s tribunal claim after he quit amid allegations of Priti Patel’s bullying, departmental accounts confirm.

Former permanent secretary Sir Philip Rutnam accepted the six-figure sum earlier this year after launching legal action against the Home Secretary.

He dramatically resigned in February last year, accusing Ms Patel of a “vicious and orchestrated” briefing campaign against him, claiming constructive dismissal and accusing her of bullying subordinates. An employment tribunal was due to hear his case in September.

The Home Office’s annual report and accounts for 2020-21 confirm he received a payout of £340,000 plus legal costs - taking the spend to at least £370,000 plus VAT of an anticipated £6,000.

Although the figures were previously reported, neither Sir Philip’s representatives nor the department would publicly disclose the amount at the time.

The document, published on Thursday, said: “Sir Philip Rutnam resigned from his post as Permanent Secretary of the Home Office on 29 February 2020 and subsequently began legal proceedings against the department.

“On 4 March 2021, the Home Office and Sir Philip signed an agreement to settle these proceedings. As part of this settlement, the Home Office made a special payment of £340,000. A contribution to his legal costs was also made of £30,000 plus VAT.”

Shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said: “Taxpayers will be appalled at having to pick up the bill for the home secretary’s unacceptable behaviour

“This money could have been used on extra police officers, or tackling anti-social behaviour.

“It was wrong that when Priti Patel broke the ministerial code, it was the prime minister’s independent adviser who resigned. As usual with this government, it is one rule for them, another for everyone else.”

By Press Association

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in