China and the New Coronavirus: challenges of an interconnected world -

GavekalResearch
April 2020
The Month That
Changed Everything
Arthur Kroeber

GavekalResearch 2
Impact of an epidemic
•  Covid-19 impact is sweeping across the globe and is creating a
severe worldwide recession. Short-term decline in economic
activity will be massive and recovery will be slow.
•  China’s experience with the virus provides a template for
understanding what will happen elsewhere.
•  Geopolitically, the most worrying impact of the epidemic is that
it is widening rather than narrowing the US-China rift.

GavekalResearch 3
I. Dimensions of the disease

GavekalResearch 4
What we know and don’t know about Covid-19
1.  Severity and spread of Covid-19
Ø  True fatality is unclear: case fatality rates differ widely by region and change
over time.
Ø  But we do know that it is severe enough, and spreads fast enough, to cripple
public health systems if left unchecked.
Ø  Public health responses are being designed to prevent repeats of the Wuhan
and Lombardy disasters.
2.  Extent of public health measures
Ø  Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea acted early, using testing and targeted
tracking and isolation (less disruptive).
Ø  China acted late and resorted to mass shutdowns lasting five to 10 weeks.
Ø  The US and Europe are acting even later than China.
3.  Effectiveness of public health measures
Ø  The good news: social distancing works promptly. China’s Jan 23 lockdown
largely flattened the ex-Hubei curve in two weeks and Hubei’s in four.
Ø  The bad news: to prevent a resurgence, social restrictions need to stay in
place for one to two months after the curve begins to flatten.

GavekalResearch 5
The epidemic continues to spread rapidly

GavekalResearch 6
The US and EU were far slower to react than East Asian
countries and are paying the price in bigger epidemics
with far more deaths. Neither region has achieved the
curve-flattening that China did in mid-February and
South Korea did in early March. Social distancing and
business closures took effect in most European and US
regions between March 15-25. These could well lead to a
peak in new daily infections and deaths by mid-April.
After initial delays, China instituted nationwide social
distancing, travel restrictions and business closures on
January 23. It did so as the country headed into its lunar
new year holiday. So Beijing needed just to amplify and
lengthen a regularly scheduled slowdown. In February
South Korea instituted huge testing, tracing and isolation
of suspected cases. Both the Chinese and Korean
responses rapidly brought the epidemic under control.
The US and EU were far slower to react than East Asian
countries and are paying the price in bigger epidemics
with far more deaths. Neither region has achieved the
curve-flattening that China did in mid-February and South
Korea did in early March. Social distancing and business
closures took effect in most European and US regions
between March 15-25. These could well lead to a peak in
new daily infections and deaths by mid-April.
US and European cases and fatalities will rise a lot more

GavekalResearch 7
Mathematically, an
epidemic is an exponential
function. To spot when an
epidemic is being brought
under control, we need to
look at the“jolt”, or change
in the acceleration of total
cases (or fatalities, where
new case data is
uncertain). When this
change in the daily growth
rate gets on a smooth
downward path, moving
consistently from 20%
down to 10% and lower,
the epidemic is controlled.
(Control measures must
stay in place long after
this path is established.)
China’s epidemic began to
be controlled in early Feb
(mid-Feb for Hubei); South
Korea’s in mid-March.
This is what success looks like

GavekalResearch 8
Case data is unreliable: many Covid-19 cases are
symptom-free and/or go untested. Deaths are a more
reliable indicator. They suggest that after a month of
lockdown Italy is close to a sustainable slowdown; the rest
of Europe is a few weeks behind.
Two weeks into partial lockdowns, the US has higher
growth rates in fatalities but is also trending in the right
direction.
General conclusions:
•  By mid-April, the US and Europe could be where China
was in early/mid-February.
• Because they started later and let the disease spread, US
and European recovery will be slower than China’s.
US and Europe are not there yet

GavekalResearch 9
In the US, New York is by far the biggest hot spot,
accounting for nearly 60% of all recorded US fatalities.
Fatalities are likely to keep growing rapidly in New York
for another two weeks; the key question is whether
social controls got put into place soon enough in the rest
of the country to bend the curve.
Until recently the overwhelming majority of Covid-19
fatalities in Europe were in Italy. Now fatalities are slowing
in Italy, probably thanks to the extreme social controls
imposed there in early March.
Meanwhile fatalities in Spain, France, the UK and even
Germany (which previously had a low death rate) are
growing at double-digits.
In the US, New York is by far the biggest hot spot,
accounting for nearly 60% of all recorded US fatalities.
Fatalities are likely to keep growing rapidly in New York for
another two weeks; the key question is whether social
controls got put into place soon enough in the rest of the
country to bend the curve.
Where the deaths are

GavekalResearch 10
Fatality rates must be
treated carefully. The true
fatality rate is deaths/total
infections. Since
measuring total infections
for a disease like Covid-19
(as with seasonal flu) is
almost impossible, the true
fatality rate can only be
estimated after the fact by
statistical modeling.
The case fatality rate is
deaths/confirmed cases.
It varies due to local
conditions (e.g. health care
quality; demographics)
and change over time.
• China Hubei vs ex-Hubei
shows the difference
social controls can make.
• Rising CFRs in the US and
Europe (ex-Italy)are a
source of concern.
Fatality rates are hard to interpret

GavekalResearch 11
But….this scenario makes some Big assumptions:
•  All states implement tight social controls and
business closures by April 1
•  All social controls remain in place through end-May
This study is therefore a best-case scenario, assuming
perfect compliance with strict controls in all states. Even
in this scenario, median expected deaths are 82,000,
double the total expected for this year’s seasonal ﬂu.
A best-of-all-possible worlds view for the US is in a recent
modeling study by the University of Washington. The US
CDC is using similar data. This model estimates Covid-19
cases and fatalities, and the resulting extra demand for
ICU beds and ventilators. It suggests that daily fatalities
will peak around April 15, and total ICU bed demand (led
by New York) a bit earlier. By late May, fatalities and ICU
bed demand will be back to mid-March levels.
But….this scenario makes some big assumptions:
•  All states implement tight social controls and
business closures by April 1
•  All social controls remain in place through end-May
This study is therefore a best-case scenario, assuming
perfect compliance with strict controls in all states. Even
in this scenario, median expected deaths are 82,000,
double the total expected for this year’s seasonal ﬂu.
Best possible outcome: If whole US does everything right, a mid-April peak

GavekalResearch 12
General conclusions
1.  China is a good template for understanding Europe and the US.
Ø  All three regions reacted late and were forced to impose massive social
controls, at great economic cost.
Ø  China imposed its controls on January 23. Full controls on Hubei stayed in
force for two months. Many residual controls remain in place. By March 31
the economy was operating at ~75% of normal capacity.
Ø  Social controls imposed in Europe and the US in mid/late-March are likely to
stay largely in place until mid/late-May.
2.  There are no silver bullets.
Ø  Viral infections are hard to treat; promising Covid-19 treatments
(chloroquine, remdesivir) have yet to have large-scale clinical trials on live
subjects. A vaccine is a minimum 12-18 months away. There is no convincing
evidence that the virus weakens in warm weather.
3.  Exit strategies will be designed with caution.
Ø  In the next two weeks, cases and deaths will rise sharply, but leading
indicators (jolts) will start falling. Countries will then have about a month to
ﬁgure out how to relax social controls without re-igniting the epidemic.

GavekalResearch 13
II. Economic impacts

GavekalResearch 14
China: a historic shock to growth

GavekalResearch 15
Growth will also collapse in the US…

GavekalResearch 16
…and Europe

GavekalResearch 17
China’s recovery is happening, but slowly and unevenly

GavekalResearch 18
China’s exports will take a big hit from the global slowdown

GavekalResearch 19
Small businesses are in trouble and restoring employment will be tough

GavekalResearch 20
Moves by Chinese policymakers have been fairly
restrained compared to the actions in Western countries.
This reflects different lessons learned from the 2008 crisis:
the US and EU want to avoid a repeat of their under-
reaction then, while China wants to avoid a repeat of its
over-reaction. While China is likely to step up monetary
easing with deposit-rate cuts and other measures, the
People’s Bank of China is being reactive not proactive.
As usual, fiscal policy centers on infrastructure investment:
current trends point to a bounce to ~10% growth but the
government could juice that up to nearly 20%. This will
replace some lost export demand, but not all. Implicitly
the government is accepting it will not be able to offset
the whole growth shock from the global outbreak. Even
Chinese brokerages, who rarely deviate from the official
line, are now forecasting 2-3% GDP growth for 2020.
Monetary and fiscal response has been surprisingly tame

GavekalResearch 21
III. Long-run implications

GavekalResearch 22
A lot will change
•  Economic models
Ø  Massive interventions to support incomes and businesses will
permanently increase government role in economy.
Ø  Eﬃciency-driven economic model tarnished; resiliency and
redundancy become more important.
•  Supply chains
Ø  Chaos and bottlenecks in getting essential medical equipment (often
from China) to the US creates overwhelming pressure for localized
pharma/medical equipment supply chains.
Ø  Other supply chains are harder to move but will also face pressure.
•  Geopolitics
Ø  Covid-19 has widened the US-China rift rather than healing it.
Ø  Despite eﬀorts to increase short-term cooperation, US political elites
increasingly see China as an untrustworthy and a dangerous adversary.

Gavekal Ltd Head Office
Suite 3101 Central Plaza
18 Harbour Road
Wanchai, Hong Kong
Tel: +852 2869 8363
Fax: +852 2869 8131
Gavekal Dragonomics
China Office
Room 2110, Tower A
Pacific Century Place, 2A Gongti Beilu
Beijing 100027, China
Tel: +86 10 8454 9987
Fax: +86 10 8454 9984
For inquiries contact
sales@gavekal.com
www.gavekal.com

China and the New Coronavirus: challenges of an interconnected world -

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a China and the New Coronavirus: challenges of an interconnected world -

Semelhante a China and the New Coronavirus: challenges of an interconnected world - (20)

Mais de Fundação Fernando Henrique Cardoso

Mais de Fundação Fernando Henrique Cardoso (20)

Último

Último (20)

China and the New Coronavirus: challenges of an interconnected world -