What type of submission is this (choose only one option)?
* must provide value
Symposium
Workshop
Roundtable Discussion
Abstract for Oral Presentation or Poster Presentation (committee decision)
Are you a NIDUS Investigator and/or Bootcamp Participant?
* must provide value
Yes No
Enter the Abstract title here:
* must provide value
Educational objectives (list 3)
Symposia are organized in a 90-minute session format for presenting related research on a single topic or theme (e.g., pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment). Preference is given to symposia that are empirically based, and either present new research data or the findings of systematic literature reviews. The format typically includes a chairperson and three or four primary presenters. The chairperson, who may also be a presenter, arranges the symposium, provides a brief overview of the topic for the audience, and introduces speakers.
Please provide a brief description of the proposed symposia and the role of each participant.
* must provide value
Workshops are intended to provide an in-depth review of topics that are of immediate use in the clinical setting. To this end, presenters should provide participants with handouts and summaries outlining the workshop material. ADS requests that the content of workshops be empirically derived and include evidence-based approaches to the care of patients. Workshops are 90-minute session sessions, which typically involve brief presentations from individual panel members, followed by the opportunity for a lively and informative discussion. This format allows for substantial audience participation and should be highly interactive.
Please provide a brief description of the workshop and the role of each participant.
* must provide value
Roundtable Discussions are intended to identify an important area in delirium research that has been mired in controversy and to bring together experts to help move the field forward. The purpose is to review and discuss scientific research related to the topic, to provide a forum for interaction between experts on the topic, and, ultimately, to develop clear consensus statements or recommendations for research about the topic. ADS will select one (1) roundtable discussion this year.
Please provide a list of experts with the qualifications that make them suitable candidates for participation in the roundtable discussion.
* must provide value
Oral presentation and poster abstracts are single submissions, with one or more authors. Abstracts should not exceed 300 words, should be single-spaced, and titles should be formatted in uppercase and lowercase letters. Use of product names in the title or body may lead to abstract disqualification. Please use generic names for all therapeutic agents and define all abbreviations with first usage. When percentages are used, the absolute numbers from which the fractions are derived must also be stated.
Oral presentations will be allotted a minimum of 10 minutes for presentation of the work, followed by a brief Q&A session. This format may provide only limited opportunity for fully presenting one's work and for interacting with attendees. Abstracts chosen for oral presentation will be integrated into the remainder of the scientific program by the ADS Conference Planning Committee. Abstracts that are not selected for oral presentations will be automatically evaluated for poster presentations.
All authors must have approved the abstract
Would you like your abstract considered for either oral/poster presentation or only a poster presentation? For consideration for oral presentations, submissions have to be received before the submission deadline for the oral presentations.
* must provide value
Oral or poster presentation
Only poster presentation
Please enter an abstract of your proposal (maximum 300 words)
Organize abstract sections using the following headings:
- OBJECTIVE(S) - The hypothesis tested or purpose of the study.
- METHODS - Details of the study design or protocol.
- RESULTS - Results of the study with appropriate statistical inferences.
- CONCLUSIONS - Clinical importance and potential significance of findings.
* must provide value
Typing your name in this box indicates that you agree to the following:
- If accepted for a presentation, I will provide copies of my presentation in accordance with requirements for CME accreditation.
- If accepted for a presentation, I will provide to ADS a version of the presentation for distribution to registered attendees by May 1, 2018.
* must provide value
How many speakers/authors are included with this proposal submission or abstract? (maximum number is 5)Please list authors/speakers in the order you want listed in the program/syllabus in the following sections.
* must provide value
No more than 11 authors allowed
Author #1: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #1: First Name
* must provide value
Author #1: Middle Initial
Author #1: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #1: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Professional Title
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
* must provide value
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #2: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #2: First Name
* must provide value
Author #2: Middle Initial
Author #2: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #2: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
* must provide value
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #3: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #3: First Name
* must provide value
Author #3: Middle Initial
Author #3: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #3: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
* must provide value
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #4: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #4: First Name
* must provide value
Author #4: Middle Initial
Author #4: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #4: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
* must provide value
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #5: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #5: First Name
* must provide value
Author #5: Middle Initial
Author #5: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #5: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #6: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #6: First Name
* must provide value
Author #6: Middle Initial
Author #6: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #6: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #7: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #7: First Name
* must provide value
Author #7: Middle Initial
Author #7: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #7: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #8: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #8: First Name
* must provide value
Author #8: Middle Initial
Author #8: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #8: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #9: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #9: First Name
* must provide value
Author #9: Middle Initial
Author #9: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #9: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
* must provide value
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #10: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #10: First Name
* must provide value
Author #10: Middle Initial
Author #10: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #10: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
* must provide value
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Author #11: Last Name
* must provide value
Author #11: First Name
* must provide value
Author #11: Middle Initial
Author #11: Primary Email
* must provide value
Author #11: Institution Affiliation
* must provide value
Will this author/speaker present at the conference?
(For proposals for workshops, symposia and round table, there will be multiple speakers; for oral and poster abstracts please identify the representative author who will be presenting).
* must provide value
Yes No
Mailing address (house/apt number, street, city, state, country)
* must provide value
Clay Angel Jose Maldonado Pratik Pandharipande Marianne Shaughnessy
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of Symposia/Worksop
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Interest/relevance of topic to ADS conference attendees
Highly irrelevant to majority of ADS conference attendees Low significance and relevance to ADS conference attendees Quite significant and of importance to the ADS conference attendees Very important and relevant to the ADS conference attendees
Organization of speakers/topics
Extremely Poor- no cohesive theme and inexperienced presenters Reasonable content and speaker experience Good cohesive theme and reasonable experience among presenters Excellent cohesive theme and speakers
Clay Angel Jose Maldonado Pratik Pandharipande Marianne Shaughnessy
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of Symposia/Worksop
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Interest/relevance of topic to ADS conference attendees
Highly irrelevant to majority of ADS conference attendees Low significance and relevance to ADS conference attendees Quite significant and of importance to the ADS conference attendees Very important and relevant to the ADS conference attendees
Organization of speakers/topics
Extremely Poor- no cohesive theme and inexperienced presenters Reasonable content and speaker experience Good cohesive theme and reasonable experience among presenters Excellent cohesive theme and speakers
Clay Angel Jose Maldonado Pratik Pandharipande Marianne Shaughnessy
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of Symposia/Worksop
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Interest/relevance of topic to ADS conference attendees
Highly irrelevant to majority of ADS conference attendees Low significance and relevance to ADS conference attendees Quite significant and of importance to the ADS conference attendees Very important and relevant to the ADS conference attendees
Organization of speakers/topics
Extremely Poor- no cohesive theme and inexperienced presenters Reasonable content and speaker experience Good cohesive theme and reasonable experience among presenters Excellent cohesive theme and speakers
Clay Angel Jose Maldonado Pratik Pandharipande Marianne Shaughnessy
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of Symposia/Worksop
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Interest/relevance of topic to ADS conference attendees
Highly irrelevant to majority of ADS conference attendees Low significance and relevance to ADS conference attendees Quite significant and of importance to the ADS conference attendees Very important and relevant to the ADS conference attendees
Organization of speakers/topics
Extremely Poor- no cohesive theme and inexperienced presenters Reasonable content and speaker experience Good cohesive theme and reasonable experience among presenters Excellent cohesive theme and speakers
Andrew Auerbach John Devlin Vanja Douglas Mark Oldham
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Completely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Andrew Auerbach John Devlin Vanja Douglas Mark Oldham
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Comletely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Andrew Auerbach John Devlin Vanja Douglas Mark Oldham
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Comletely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Andrew Auerbach John Devlin Vanja Douglas Mark Oldham
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Comletely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Kristen Brooks Leanne Boehm Donna Fick Heidi Lindroth Stephanie Rogers Christine Waszynski
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Completely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Kristen Brooks Leanne Boehm Donna Fick Heidi Lindroth Stephanie Rogers Christine Waszynski
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Comletely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Kristen Brooks Leanne Boehm Donna Fick Heidi Lindroth Stephanie Rogers Christine Waszynski
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Comletely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Kristen Brooks Leanne Boehm Donna Fick Heidi Lindroth Stephanie Rogers Christine Waszynski
Do you have conflict of interest with this abstract that precludes you from scoring it?
Yes No
Originality of research question
Not original Minimally original Moderately original Highly original
Weak Poor Good Excellent
Comletely disorganized Significant incomplete information Adequate presentation, some incomplete information Excellent presentation
no significance whatsoever; highly irrelevant to the delirium field Very poor significance and relevance to the delirium field Quite significant results; of importance to the delirium field Highly significant results; very important and relevant to the delirium field
Submit
Save & Return Later