1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SAMET v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
 

SAMET v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Case No. 5:12-cv-01891 PSG.

SARAH SAMET et al., Plaintiffs, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

August 24, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sarah Samet, Plaintiff, represented by Ben F. Pierce Gore , Pratt & Associates, Alex Peet , Lovelace Law Firm, P.A., Ananda N. Chaudhuri , Fleischman Law Firm, Brian K Herrington , Don Barrett, P.A., Carol Nelkin , Nelkin, Nelkin & Krock, PC, Charles F. Barrett , Charles Barrett, P.C., David Malcolm McMullan, Jr. , Don Barrett, P.A., David Shelton , David Shelton, PLLC, Dewitt Marshall Lovelace, Sr. , Lovelace Law Firm, P.A., Frank Karam , Fleischman Law Firm, J. Price Coleman , Coleman Law Firm, Jay P. Nelkin , Nelkin & Nelkin, P.C., John W. (Don) Barrett , Don Barrett, P.A., Katherine B. Riley , Don Barrett, P.A., Keith M. Fleischman , The Fleischman Law Firm, Richard Barrett , Law Offices of Richard R. Barrett, PLLC & Stuart M Nelkin , Nelkin, Nelkin & Krock, PC.

Robert Figy, Plaintiff, represented by Ben F. Pierce Gore , Pratt & Associates, Alex Peet , Ananda N. Chaudhuri , Fleischman Law Firm, Brian K Herrington , Carol Nelkin , Charles F. Barrett , David Malcolm McMullan, Jr. , Don Barrett, P.A., David Shelton , Dewitt Marshall Lovelace, Sr. , Frank Karam , J. Price Coleman , Coleman Law Firm, Jay P. Nelkin , John W. (Don) Barrett , Katherine B. Riley , Keith M. Fleischman , Richard Barrett & Stuart M Nelkin .

Kellogg Company, Defendant, represented by Dean N. Panos , Jenner And Block LLP & Kenneth Kiyul Lee , Jenner & Block LLP.

Kellogg Sales Company, Defendant, represented by Dean N. Panos , Jenner And Block LLP & Kenneth Kiyul Lee , Jenner & Block LLP.

Procter and Gamble Company, Defendant, represented by Craig Ellsworth Stewart , Jones Day & Darren Keith Cottriel .

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(Re: Docket No. 134)

Plaintiffs Sarah Samet and Robert Figy, individually and on behalf of similarly situated Plaintiffs, move for reconsideration of their unjust enrichment/quasi-contract claim. Because the Ninth Circuit recently decided that the duplicative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases