1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STANIFORTH v. JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
 

STANIFORTH v. JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

No. D064111.

FAY STANIFORTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant and Respondent; JOHN CHIANG, as State Controller, etc., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

May 29, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jorn S. Rossi and Paul G. Mast for all Plaintiffs and Appellants except William Reppy, Jr.

William Reppy, Jr., in pro. per.

Reed Smith, Harvey L. Leiderman and Jeffrey R. Rieger for Defendant and Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

McDONALD, J.

Plaintiff Faye Staniforth filed this action, on behalf of herself and similarly situated persons (collectively pensioners), alleging numerous claims against defendant and respondent the Judges' Retirement System (JRS). The principal claim raised by pensioners' action was that JRS had not adhered to its obligations to pensioners under Olson v. Cory (1980) 27 Cal.3d 532 (Olson I) and, as a result, pension...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases