POLICE bosses have admitted their "negligent" officers failed to call an ambulance for a mentally ill man who later took his own life.
In 2009, Christopher Peden dialled 999 and asked to be taken into care for his own safety.
Police officers arrived but did not phone an ambulance for the 26-year-old, who then ran into the path of an oncoming vehicle.
After four years and an independent investigation, police chiefs yesterday apologised to the Peden family.
The two officers now face disciplinary action but Mr Peden's father Edward has called for them to be sacked.
Mr Peden Sr, 67, said: "They shouldn't be allowed to stay in their jobs.
"I'd have them done for manslaughter.
"Not calling an ambulance was the catalyst for Christopher's death. If they had phoned for an ambulance he would have been taken to hospital and he would have been nowhere near that road. It's their negligence that has cost him his life."
The incident occurred in January 2009 outside a property in Wester Hailes, Edinburgh.
Mr Peden, who had a history of mental health problems and drug abuse, phoned emergency services and pled for help.
He was met by Lothian and Borders Police officers who phoned the Scottish Ambulance Service but did not request an ambulance after hearing he could only be taken to A&E.
They are then understood to have left the scene. Mr Peden then ran into the path of an oncoming vehicle and died of his injuries the following day.
An independent report upheld complaints about investigations into the case.
Iain Whyte, convener of Lothian and Borders Police Board and chair of the Scottish Police Authority Conveners' Forum, said: "Obviously it is appropriate that the police apologise for the failings in this case and do what they can to make sure these kind of things don't happen in the future."
Lothian and Borders Police – now part of Police Scotland – has written a letter of apology to the Peden family.
Superintendent John McKenzie wrote: "The officers in attendance were in neglect of their duty by failing to ask for an ambulance to attend, as requested by your son, thereby depriving him of an appropriate medical response."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article