Michael Steele: ‘We Are Not Warming’

Michael SteeleThe Associated Press Michael Steele, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, said we live on a cooling planet.

The Republican National Committee Chairman, Michael Steele, has weighed in on climate change.

In a March 6 radio appearance that is only now percolating through the blogosphere, Mr. Steele apparently fielded a skeptic’s question about global warming. As transcribed by The Huffington Post, a liberal site, Mr. Steele thanked the questioner and replied this way:

We are cooling. We are not warming. The warming you see out there, the supposed warming, and I am using my finger quotation marks here, is part of the cooling process. Greenland, which is now covered in ice, it was once called Greenland for a reason, right? Iceland, which is now green. Oh I love this. Like we know what this planet is all about. How long have we been here? How long? No very long.

Mr. Steele -– the originator of the “drill baby drill” slogan that dominated last year’s Republican National Convention — appears to be aligning himself with Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma, also a Republican, who has denounced the idea of a global warming catastrophe as “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” and said that many of the Obama administration’s early moves amounted to “environmental thuggery.”

Sen. Representative John Boehner, the Senate House minority leader, has described cap-and-trade as a “carbon tax that increases taxes on all Americans who drive a car, who have a job, who turn on a light switch.”

Many other Republicans argue that climate change is real and needs to be addressed. Sen. John McCain, the presidential nominee last year, is one of the original architects of a Congressional cap-and-trade bill, though he forcefully opposes the Obama administration’s plan to auction off emissions allowances to polluters (Mr. McCain would prefer to give the initial allowances away free).

Jon Huntsman, the Republican governor of Utah, also favors a cap-and-trade system for limiting carbon emissions, as mentioned in this New York Times profile. So does Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California.

In Washington, however, many say it is not Republicans, but the coal-state Democrats in the Senate, who will decide the fate of any cap-and-trade bill.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Yeah, Erik the Red actually started calling it Greenland as a PR gimmick to get people to go there. A nation of millions rolls its eyes at you, Mr. Steele.

Sorry Mr Steele, but you don’t have the qualifications to talk seriously about climatology with any amount of authority. All armchair-commentator quality analysis, particularly from politicians, will be ignored.

CO2 is our friend. AGW is junk. Embrace this era of CO2 prosperity. As long as we produce clean CO2… all is good. Plants will love you for it.

Greenland actually was (and is) green – in places around the edges, for a couple of months in summer. So you’re a Viking captain on a longship: just how far inland can you see?

I remember from grade school being taught that Greenland and Iceland were so named, more or less in reverse, to attract people to mostly icy “Greenland” and keep them away from the actually more green “Iceland”. Irregardless, it is completely amazing to me that the head of the RNC is arguing against climate change based on arbitrary names of countries! Can’t he come up with something slightly more scientific than that? If not, he should keep quiet and let the grown-ups talk.

Mr Steele was really really funny on Colbert last night but this joke seems to fall a little flat. Maybe he needs a new writer?

//www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/222214/march-19-2009/michael-steele-s-rap-battle-response

When will the republicans learn that not doing anything will cost them more in the long run? Money, political capital… 20 years from now, when even the most fearfully deluded have no choice but to ‘believe’ (as if there ever was a choice) in the global warming, people with memories (like me) will point their fingers at the Repubs and say, “You! You were the ones who lied and denied. You are the ones that have cost us so much.”

There feet will be held to the fire.

What a joke.

Ah yes, the RNC “leader” beholden to the right wing gasbag Limbaugh, speaking on climate change. As much credibility as I have on nuclear physics.

The level of idiocy is incredible! Saying that Greenland was once green and using that as proof for global cooling is akin to saying that the Moon is made of cheese, and thus we couldn’t have landed on it! Someone needs to learn something called “science”!

The article contains an (indisputable!) error: John Boehner is not a senator but is the minority leader in the House of Reps.

John Boehner is the House — not Senate — minority leader. There’s a difference.

… and I should listen to this drivel why? What are Steele’s qualifications to discuss climate science??

Its seems a large number of the Republican Party has decided to continue to be on the wrong side of this issue. The longer it takes for them to realize that climate change is real, it is dangerous, and it is man-made, the faster they will cease to be a relevant party in this country.

AWG is another resurrection of the world energy tax. However they put it into the context where a bunch of naive idealist will latch onto it without questions.

Most don’t have a clue about science and their eyes gloss over so they accept liberal leadership’s lies without question.

More and more scientists are dissenting including a LARGE number of former IPCC scientists. AGW is POLITICAL science meant to control industry and redistribute wealth.

Liberals would feel pretty stupid when this hoax becomes obvious but liberals seem to just change their opinion with the wind blows so they’ll deny to themselves that they were played like a sucker.

You have to remember who Mr. Steele is talking to, he isn’t talking to people who hafe an ounce of common sense,he is talking to people who live their lives by sound bites (for example, the blue collar worker the other day who told me the whole financial meltdown was caused by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and “giving those people” loans they couldn’t afford (want to guess who ‘those people’ are?), because that has been the GOP deflection, since fannie and freddie are generally tied to the democcrats (leaving out that the financial institutions the GOP refused to regulate make Fannie and Freddie look like small potatoes, which they were.AIG alone has taken more bailout money then fannie and freddie combined)….

The anti global warming people (read coal and oil state people) point to evidence that greenland once had a 100 year warming cycle, that we are at the end of a long warming period (true), that ‘sun activity could do this’ *(despite the fact that 50 years of monitoring show little change in solar radiation), and better “They had snow in Mississippi a couple of years ago”. They cite the little ice age in Europe or a localized warming someplace else, leaving out the little fact that localized events mean nothing, that on a global scale the little ice age was matched by a ‘little warming period’ someplace else, and that global temperatures are warming. Data often cited by the anti forces generally turn out to be either statistical extrapolation, or they are using data that has been proven wrong (one weather monitoring station on a balloon was found to be too high in the atmosphere, giving cooler results then expected, same with a monitoring station in the ocean that was too deep). Evidence of global warming at deep layers of the ocean shows that it is a global phenemenon. More importantly, in all the ‘small cycle’ warming seen in the past millions of years, based on data taken from samples of ice going back that far, we have never seen warming ramping up this far.

Likewise, we have the Rush Limbaugh’s sneering about .5 degrees celsius increase, telling the boobs “do you care if it is .5 degrees celsius warmer?” without mentioning that it isn’t the same as if a day is .5 degrees cooler or warmer, that that is a lot…

He has totally sold out to the dittoheads in order to keep his job.

What a pathetic tool.

he’s right ! The German Democratic Republic, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the People’s Republic of China, those all must be/have been either Democracies or Republics, right ??

god, what a maroon.

“CO2 limits will raise taxes, therefore global warming is a myth” – seems like a case of reversed reasoning, with the desired outcome driving the premises instead of vice versa.


Red actually started calling it Greenland

Hold on thar Wild B.!
I have recorded this message from two of my shadowy figures.


Chemical Ali, why has Greenland’s hoary beard turned white with icy rage?


Elementary, Comical Ali. The increased intensity of the hydrogen bonding of ice accentuated by higher CO2 atmospheric content.


But how can I demonstrate this to myself when I finally get that dream job at Doktor Frankenstein’s LaBoreAtory?


I’ll need to preface my remarks with a word of caution about safety hazard of experiment done without an adult incantator being there to take the hit. Do not put glass containers into the freezer. You do not want to be cut at cleaning out the shards.
.
Put sodium free seltzer, plain water, two drinking beakers all but separately into frig for 2 hours. Then pour ice water into one beaker, but seltzer into other beaker. Place each beaker into freezer. Check every 20 minutes.


I can see where this discussion is headed. Water with its lower molarity should freeze first. But if carbon dioxide of global warming intensifies hydrogen bonding through carbonic acid then seltzer freezes first to prove that elephant is brighter than donkey.


You learn quickly, Comical. Remember — no shards in freezer!


Excuse me, but it is time on TV for the Red Green Show.

Mister Steele, you give pig-ignorant, anti-intellectual morons a bad name.

this dude is a disgrace. best shut it.

I think Steele may be even worse at public speaking than W.

The real question is: What does Rush think?

The fact is that there is no ‘truth’ and everyone deserves an opinion. Global Warming, caused by human activity may very well be happening, but there is a chance that it is not.

20 year ago, scientists said that AIDS would kill far more people than it has, yet is you had suggested at that time that it wouldn’t, you would have been laughed at, much like many in here at laughing at Mr. Steele’s comments about global warming.

When we deride another person’s opinion we steer toward fascism. It’s best to politely agree to disagree.