10-K 1 activecare.htm ACTIVECARE, INC. activecare.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
 
þ
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013
OR
 
¨
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _________________   to _________________

Commission file number: 0-53570
ActiveCare, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
 
87-0578125
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
1365 West Business Park Drive, Orem, Utah  84058
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
 
(877) 219-6050
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.00001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  þ    No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.      ¨

 
 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer ¨
 
Accelerated filer ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer ¨
 
Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).           Yes ¨    No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 29, 2013 was approximately $6 million, based on the average bid and asked price ($1.60 per share) and a total of 3,791,208 shares issued and outstanding on that date.

There were 32,860,314 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of January 13, 2014.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the registrant implemented a 10-for-1 reverse common stock split.  The financial statements and data for all periods covered by this report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of the reverse stock split.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

None.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):  Yes    ¨      No þ

 
 

 
 
ACTIVECARE, INC.
 
FORM 10-K
 
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2013
 
INDEX
 
       
Page
   
Part I
   
         
Item 1
 
Business
 
1
Item 1A
 
Risk Factors
 
10
Item 2
 
Properties
 
16
Item 3
 
Legal Proceedings
 
16
Item 4
 
Mine Safety Disclosures (omitted)
   
         
   
Part II
   
         
Item 5
 
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
16
Item 6
 
Selected Financial Data (omitted)
   
Item 7
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
18
Item 7A
 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (omitted)
   
Item 8
 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
24
Item 9
 
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
25
Item 9A
 
Controls and Procedures
 
25
Item 9B
 
Other Information
 
26
         
   
Part III
   
         
Item 10
 
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
26
Item 11
 
Executive Compensation
 
29
Item 12
 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
32
Item 13
 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
34
Item 14
 
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
36
         
   
Part IV
   
         
Item 15
 
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
 
37
         
Signatures
 
39
 
 
 

 
 
PART I
 
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to our operations, results of operations, and other matters that are based on our current expectations, estimates, assumptions, and projections. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions as to future events that might not prove to be accurate. Actual outcomes and results could differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in these forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties, and other factors that might cause such differences, some of which could be material, include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed under the section of this report entitled “Risk Factors.”
 
Item 1.  Business
 
Background
 
ActiveCare, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “ActiveCare”) was formed March 5, 1998 as a wholly owned subsidiary of SecureAlert, Inc. [OTCBB: SCRA.OB], a Utah corporation, formerly known as RemoteMDx, Inc. (“SecureAlert”).  We were spun off from SecureAlert in February 2009.  Effective July 15, 2009, we changed our name to ActiveCare, Inc., and our state of incorporation to Delaware. Our fiscal year ends on September 30.
 
During fiscal year 2013, we announced a 10-for-1 reverse common stock split, and all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse common stock split.
 
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless indicated otherwise, references to “dollars” and “$” are to United States dollars.
 
We own or have rights to trademarks, service marks or trade names that we use in connection with the operation of our business, including, without limitation, “CareCenter,” “4G,” “Green Wire,” “ActiveOne,” “ActiveOne+,” “ActiveHome,” “ActiveCare” and the stylized “ActiveCare” logo.  Solely for convenience, some of the trademarks, service marks and trade names referred to in this report are listed without the ©, ® and ™ symbols, but we will assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights to our copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade names and domain names. The trademarks, service marks and trade names of other companies appearing in this report are, to our knowledge, the property of their respective owners.
 
General
 
During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, we received valuable feedback through sales and focus groups reaching thousands of patients.  In fiscal year 2012, we launched an additional product line focused on technology for assisting the chronically ill.  Our primary focus is on markets addressing chronic conditions and disease states.  Remote patient monitoring (“RPM”) is a technology to enable monitoring of patient vital signs and physical functions outside of conventional clinical settings (e.g., in the home, work or travel).  Physiological data such as blood sugar levels, blood pressure, pulse rate, and blood oxygen levels are collected by sensors on medical peripheral devices.  Examples of these devices include glucometers, blood pressure cuffs, and pulse oximeters.  The data is stored for future assessment or transmitted to healthcare providers or third parties via wireless telecommunication devices.  Disease states targeted by RPM technology providers typically include diabetes, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, activity monitoring, and diet management.  We believe that we can improve the lives of the chronically ill and the elderly through the use of technology, while reducing the cost of care.  Central to these efforts is our state-of-the-art “CareCenter.”  This service is designed to monitor and track patients’ health conditions and chronic illnesses on a real time basis.  As part of these efforts we have staffed this sophisticated CareCenter with highly trained specialists to assist the chronically ill and elderly in managing their daily lives; 24 hours per day, seven days per week.  In order for the CareCenter to service our customers, we have developed and continue to develop numerous products designed to improve the health of the chronically ill and to enable the elderly to maintain a more active and mobile lifestyle.
 
We made two acquisitions during fiscal year 2012: 4G Biometrics, LLC (“4G”); and Green Wire, LLC and affiliates (“Green Wire”).  4G expanded our penetration into the health monitoring market, monitoring members’ diabetic and other chronic illness parameters utilizing our CareCenter capabilities.  The Green Wire acquisition brought us thousands of new Personal Emergency Response System (“PERS”) members and a channel for marketing and up-selling our portfolio of products.
 
 
1

 
 
There are obvious problems associated with aging.  According to a 2004 presentation to the American Telemedicine Association, approximately one in every four Americans suffers from a chronic illness, which typically becomes more severe and prominent with age.  The demographics of chronic illnesses include over 15 million people with diabetes and close to 14 million with coronary heart disease (according to reports published by the American Heart Association), as well as over 10 million with osteoporosis (according to a study by the University of Maryland Medical Center).  According to studies published in the IBM Systems Journal in 2007 and one conducted by heart specialists from Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center Cardiac Transplant Service, significant cost savings can be realized by the daily monitoring of the chronically ill. 
 
With U.S. healthcare costs increasing annually, we believe that cost containment is a primary issue facing the industry. These escalating costs will only intensify as the baby-boom generation ages.  As of 2000, 35 million Americans were 65 years of age or older, and this number is projected to increase to 55 million by the year 2020, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  By that year, one in six Americans will be over the age of 65 and by the middle of the century, the number of elderly could reach more than 86 million people, more than double the present number.  According to an article published in the National Review Online and the sources cited therein, approximately 80% of healthcare costs occur in the last two years of life.  This combined with an aging population supports the assertion that the nation is in dire need of viable cost-saving options for health care.
 
We believe that “Aging in Place” – the ability to age in your own home with the proper care services and monitoring of health and wellness needs – will significantly mitigate health care costs for the elderly.  Through the technologies we are developing, we believe we can both enhance the lives of the elderly and enable them to live more “normal” lifestyles by providing them mobility and peace of mind with the knowledge that their vital signs are being monitored and their locations are known at all times.  At the same time we can save millions of dollars in the health care sector as we identify problems and issues before they become crises.
 
We believe that through the technologies we have already developed and are continuing to develop, we can enhance the lives not only of the growing elderly segment of today’s population, but also the lives of other segments of the population, such as those with chronic illnesses.  The CareCenter is staffed around the clock with advisors that receive calls originating from our clients who utilize our products.  Our services enhance our clients’ mobility and provides them with peace of mind because they know that their vital signs are being monitored and their locations are known at all times.  We can immediately communicate with them and emergency personnel in times of need and communicate their location and an abbreviated medical history.
 
Our Product and Service Strategy
 
Our product/service strategy falls into two distinctly different categories; chronic illness monitoring and personal emergency response systems or care services.
 
Chronic Illness Monitoring
 
Chronic illness monitoring involves the use of biometric monitoring devices in combination with proprietary data and algorithms to assess and predict the wellbeing of an individual under care.  Individual care profiles are created through the aggregation of personal health and medical claims information from multiple data sources.  Real-time biometric readings for blood glucose levels, blood pressure, heart rate, weight, tidal volume and other vital readings are captured over time and added to the existing personal information.  This unique data set may now be used for proactive care protocols, care provider alerts to elevated readings, and behavioral intervention prior to crisis events.
 
Technology to facilitate data-driven chronic illness monitoring consists of three components: (1) biometric monitoring devices, (2) medical and claims data aggregation, and (3) algorithms for the analysis of the data.  Biometric monitoring devices are provided by numerous medical hardware providers and deliver a wide range of features and functionality.  ActiveCare is agnostic to any specific device requirement, and has as a core competency the ability to integrate to and capture data from any 510(k) or HL7 compliant monitoring device (see “Regulatory Matters”).  Strategic relationships have been created with technology and market leaders, and evaluation of new and emerging technology partners is ongoing.  Medical and claims data is aggregated from multiple source providers using a proprietary application programmatic interface and data storage architecture.  This data is analyzed to identify individual care needs of those entering the program.  Monitoring alerts, predictive informatics and individual care plans are created and managed using the ActiveCare technology platform.  Care for chronic conditions may now be performed in real-time, and outcomes may be measured on both a medical and claims cost basis.
 
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, we spent approximately $832,000 on research and development primarily for chronic illness monitoring related to the development of prototype methods and systems for the capture and analysis of data, as well as the development of scalable architectures to migrate to production applications and deployments.  We will continue to identify claims and medical data sets as well as analytical and informatics technologies that advance our ability to provide unique services.  Core competency will continue to evolve in the methods and technologies for data analytics and predictive informatics. 
 
 
2

 
 
Care Services
 
We have developed products that incorporate GPS, cellular capability, and fall detection, all of which are connected to our 24-hour CareCenter with the push of a button.  The transmitter can be worn on a neck pendant or belt clip, or carried in a purse, and sends a cellular signal to our CareCenter.  When the wearer of the device pushes the button, the staff at the CareCenter evaluate the situation and decide whether to call emergency services or a designated friend or family member.
 
Currently, there are separate products on the market that provide service to the PERS industry as well as products that provide fall detection, geographical location, and clinical health parameters.  However, we believe that no product on the market today has successfully integrated all of these technologies in a single effective device.  Further, none of the current solutions in the market focus on providing CareServices – assistance with everyday needs – as an alternative to costly assisted living or in-home care services as we do.
 
CareCenter
 
The central point of our product offerings is our state-of-the-art CareCenter.  Our CareCenter is staffed 24x7 with CareCenter specialists who are 911-certified and trained.  In addition, we have nurses on duty and on call that are available to assist with medical issues or questions.  Our CareCenter specialists and CareCenter provide services ranging from responding to fall alerts detected and communicated by our devices, to full service concierge services.  The staff at the CareCenter provides assistance with everyday living needs of our members, and in an emergency situation, the 911 trained CareSpecialist evaluates the situation and decides whether to call emergency services and/or a designated friend or family member.
 
In contrast to a typical monitoring center, our CareCenter is equipped with hardware and software that pinpoints the location of the incoming caller by utilizing GPS and/or cellular triangulation technology.  This capability is referred to as “telemetric”.  The operator (or CareSpecialist) can locate the caller’s precise location on a detailed map.  In addition, the CareCenter’s software will identify the caller, access the individual’s medical information, and provide location services, emergency dispatch, and medical history to emergency responders.  We believe the CareCenter is the cornerstone of our business and will support current technology as well as evolve to support the integration of future technologies.
 
Recent Developments
 
We have financed operations primarily through securities purchase agreements, long-term debt and short-term debt.  If our revenues continue to be insufficient to meet our needs, we will attempt to secure additional financing through financial institutions or through the sale of our equity or debt securities.  There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on satisfactory terms or at all.  In addition, if we only have nominal funds with which to conduct our business activities, it will negatively impact the results of our operations and our financial condition.
 
During fiscal year 2012, we established GWire Corporation (“GWire”) as a subsidiary.  Effective September 1, 2012, GWire acquired the net assets and interests of Green Wire.  We entered into employment agreements with two of Green Wire’s operating managers on November 1, 2012. These two individuals were granted 27% ownership in GWire; ActiveCare retained the remaining 73%.  During fiscal year 2013, the GWire operating managers subsequently converted their 27% ownership in GWire and 425,000 of related options to acquire shares of our common stock and as a result, we now own 100% of GWire as of September 30, 2013.
 
During fiscal year 2013, we sold the net assets and operations of our Reagents business segment for cash of $184,318.  We may receive additional annual payments equal to five percent of the net income from the Reagents business, through the fifth anniversary of the sale, provided that revenues from the Reagents business total at least $465,000 for the previous 12-month period ending on the closing date anniversary.  The sale of the Reagent segment allows us to focus our resources on the Chronic Illness Monitoring and CareService segments.
 
Our Growth Strategy
 
We anticipate that the primary growth segment for us for fiscal year 2014 will be the markets addressing chronic conditions and disease states. Our plan is to continue to focus on addressing the chronic illness and disease states markets and execute our existing business plan serving these markets.  We plan to invest in research and development and patent filings, as we broaden the services offered by our CareCenter.  Eventually we intend to add to the functionality of the ActiveOne+ to allow for vital sign monitoring for the chronically ill and additional services to assist both the mobile and homebound seniors, including those who may require a personal assistant to determine their location at any given time and to check on them during the day to ensure their safety and well being.
 
 
3

 
 
Marketing
 
We market our products through a number of distribution channels including: self-insured employers, direct-to-consumer, medical device and equipment distributors, and health care providers and other caregivers.
 
Self-Insured Companies
 
As a result of the acquisition of 4G, we expanded our fundamental business to include monitoring the well being of the rapidly growing number of diabetics in this country.  This business integrates well with our broader view towards furthering the improved health of the total population.
 
Our strategy is to develop a relationship with third-party administrators (TPAs).  TPAs administer the claims, payments, co-pays, and medical coding for self-insured companies.  They effectively act as the medical benefits administrators for their customers, most of which are not large enough to justify a fully operational in-house department.  Our strategy is achieved by providing to a TPA specific information related to the benefits to be realized by all parties, which, in most cases is substantial. Once the first customer of the TPA becomes part of the program, the key to monetary savings is the CareCenter, which operates 24/7 and is integral to chronic illness monitoring. The CareCenter is the real-time recipient of all test results which are delivered using state-of-the-art cellular glucometers. This information is gathered, sorted and reported. Each diabetic is then placed into one of three categories: (1) in compliance, (2) out of compliance, or (3) not testing. This information, which neither the TPA nor the customer has ever before seen, is then delivered to the TPA and the customer. The ultimate objective of this categorization is to increase the percentage of diabetics who are “in compliance”, which has been proven to be a major factor in reducing the cost of claims based on statistical history. Once the TPA recognizes the benefits to be realized from this information for one or more patients, it is a natural progression to add the rest of the TPA’s customer base to ActiveCare monitoring.
 
Our ultimate objective is to become a chronic illness monitor for the TPA’s customers, measuring not only blood sugar for diabetics, but also blood pressure, weight, and blood oxygen levels.
 
Research and Development Program
 
During fiscal year 2013, we spent approximately $832,000 compared to $187,000 spent during the year ended September 30, 2012, on research and development primarily related to chronic illness monitoring, including work related to the development of prototype methods and systems for the capture and analysis of data, as well as the development of scalable architectures to migrate to production applications and deployments.
 
Competition
 
We anticipate that the primary growth segment for us for fiscal year 2014 will be the markets addressing chronic illness conditions and disease states.  Over the past decade technology device manufacturers have rushed to provide peripheral devices to capture data related to chronic health conditions rather than provide any assessment or intelligence regarding the data being captured.  In most cases the data captured remains static on the peripheral device or data capture system, providing little to no perspective on the current and recent condition of the patient.  In cases in which the data are utilized, the application of that data is typically limited to the “point of care” or physician’s office.  The ActiveCare solution is a complex combination of components that provide an overall care system.  The analysis of the competitive landscape will focus on six primary market segments representing the primary components of our system, noting the implications for us resulting from the strengths of the leaders in each segment.
 
Legacy Consumer Oriented Monitoring and Communications Device Providers
 
Overview – While not a primary threat to our business model, several leading providers of health care technologies have targeted the patient monitoring market and made significant investments in pursuing the segment.  The primary business focus of these companies is high-end diagnostics equipment, point of care technologies, and health information technologies.  While the investments in telehealth technologies have totaled significant dollars they represent a very small component of these competitors’ overall business in the health care segment.  The approach to entering the market has typically been to acquire an existing technology and attempt to distribute that technology through existing distribution channels in complementary offerings.  Examples of providers in this segment include:
 
·
Phillips – Telestation
   
·
Bosch - HealthStation
   
·
Honeywell – Genesis
 
Strengths – The strengths of this segment are the competitors’ overall position in the health care market, existing distribution channels and availability of capital to fund and pursue future opportunities.
 
 
4

 
 
Weaknesses – The value proposition of the providers in this segment has been focused on providing a consumer-based platform for “telemedicine,” or providing care to a patient not at the same location as the provider of care.  Solutions have been an extension of the videophone concept, and in some cases have included connectivity to blood pressure and blood oxygen measuring peripherals. The weaknesses in the execution of this approach include:
 
·
The market / product strategy has been as a tertiary complement to the core business, lacking focus on execution.
   
·
The business model has been hardware based, focusing on the product as a “part” of the primary hardware business.
   
·
Solutions have been limited to facilitating the moment of care, and do not capture or make data available for later assessment.
   
·
Products have been based on legacy technologies, lacking ease of use and rich functionality.
   
·
Revenue models have been based on sources outside of the primary economics of health care; federal and state funded grants, patient payer, and as a bundled component of a sponsoring product line or business.
 
Summary – We do not directly compete with the offerings in this segment.  The possible threat is based on the competitors’ reassessment of strategy in this market and the ability to fund and customize products.  If they follow past patterns, we believe that we would be a prime candidate for partner relationship or acquisition by one of these competitors to gain an immediate presence in a more viable business model.
 
Current Consumer Peripheral Monitoring Device Providers
 
Overview – Competitors in this segment have specialized in the delivery of low cost diagnostic peripherals for measuring blood pressure, weight, pulse rate, blood sugar and activity.  Examples include:
 
·
A and D Medical
   
·
Foracare
 
Strengths – These competitors have refined the product requirements to meet the needs of the market.  Products are easy to use and accurately capture vitals and metrics.  In the past five years significant effort has been made to lower the cost of products as they compete more on cost rather than functionality or other benefits.
 
Weaknesses – These products continue to evolve as commodity offerings, differentiating on price rather than any other feature.  Solutions have been targeted on facilitating the moment of care, and lack complementing strategies to make data for later assessment.
 
Summary – Currently this segment provides us with some key partnerships.  They facilitate the means of capturing patient data with an easy to use, low cost offering.  While some devices have been innovative (e.g. the Telcare blood glucose monitor with embedded cellular communications) strategies continue to focus primarily on the manufacture and sale of hardware components.
 
Next Generation Monitoring Device Providers
 
Overview – The past five years have seen a proliferation of consumer-oriented devices to monitor individuals’ physical activity, sleep patterns and pulse rate.  The strategy of those in this segment has also been focused on integration with smartphones and other consumer devices.  Examples include:
 
·
Activity monitoring
   
 
o
MisFit
     
 
o
Striiv
     
 
o
Lark
     
·
Consumer vital signs monitoring
   
 
o
iHealth
     
 
o
Digifit
     
·
Sleep and diet monitoring
   
 
o
FitBit
 
Strengths – The rapid evolution of product and strategy has been fueled by the culture and investors that innovated the technology segment.  Companies such as Apple, Google, Frog Design and Stanford Research Institute (SRI) are directly or indirectly funding and leading efforts of innovation.  Designs are state-of-the-art and are focused on attracting use by consumers in daily activity.  The segment has a strong first adopter appeal.
 
 
5

 
 
Weaknesses – To date, the business models of the products in the segment have been an evolution of the products produced by traditional monitoring device companies, with one notable exception; products are not yet qualified for clinical data capture and are relegated to providing consumers with the most basic of physical monitoring data.  Providers in this segment have noted intentions to become more robust, capturing clinical data type and securing federal 510(k) medical device certification in future products.  It has also been forecasted by technology thought leaders that the segment strategy will fail unless it adds complementing user value and revenue opportunities.
 
Summary – Competitors in this segment will become strategic partners for our business model as they evolve their ability to capture and transmit clinical data.  We expect to expand into strategic market segments complementing the strengths of these technologies, offering data analytics, and personal fitness planning and wellness management services.
 
Health / Insurance Data Service Providers
 
Overview – Health data informatics has become a strategic focus of health care providers and payer organizations over the past 30 years.  Aggregation, analytics, informatics and predictive modeling have enabled service providers to differentiate and better manage the process of health care.  Traditionally providers specialized in offering information or services based on a vertical focus of EHR patient data, geographic and regional health care information, or insurance claims processing data.  Examples include:
 
·
CareFX – recently acquired by Harris Healthcare
   
·
Medicity – recently acquired by Aetna
   
·
Certify Data Systems
   
·
Benefit Informatics
 
Strengths – Data aggregation and utilization are core competencies of the companies in this segment.  Product and service offerings have been successfully marketed to insurance companies and health plan providers.
 
Weaknesses – Sources of the data driving the product strategy of these competitors is becoming increasingly available, forcing an evolution of the business model in two directions; to become a provider of advanced services (rather than data), or to be acquired by large insurance and care groups to mine that specific groups’ data.  While significant federal and state funding has driven the efforts to create regional health information organizations, projects have become graveyards for careers and future funding.  The fallout of this effort has had a significant impact on the viability of several major data services providers.
 
Summary – This segment presents us with direct competition and business opportunities.  Forced to rapidly evolve their strategies, competitors are recognizing the value of real-time and “prior to care event” data.  Increasing efforts are being made to facilitate data at the point of care and make that data available to the entire care and reimbursement cycle. Having the ability to capture and assess the data upstream of current offerings strategically differentiates our business, giving visibility to health risks in advance of change of condition and cost.  Partnering with leaders in this segment should enable us to further gain expertise in this field as well as complement our data repository. Having data of past care from these partners in combination with data of current patient conditions allows for extremely valuable predictive modeling and services.
 
Wellness / Disease Management Service Providers
 
Overview – Wellness management services have been seen as a means of addressing a future illness before it happens.  Programs are primarily cultural, with the goal of promoting healthy activity, diet, and state of mind.  Disease management has been added to the traditional health care cycle as a means of providing regular outpatient and out-of-clinic care to those primarily with chronic conditions.  Examples include:
 
·
OptumHealth
   
·
Carenet
   
·
TouchPoint
   
·
Hines Associates
 
Strengths – Preventive care, both before illness as well as during chronic condition management, has great conceptual merit and acceptance.  Significant government and corporate efforts have been made to incorporate these services as a means of addressing health issues in advance of illness and disease onset.
 
 
6

 
 
Weaknesses – The majority of past and current service offerings lack the data strategies to monitor and measure the success of programs.  Continued expansion of the industry has been challenged by the absence of data to validate outcomes and the effectiveness of these programs.
 
Summary – The entire sector is undergoing a rapid evolution.  Those not able to provide validation of their offerings will struggle to survive in the coming years.  Through partnership, acquisition or organic growth we believe that we are uniquely positioned to expand into this market, providing programs to modify behavior and overall health.  Our ability to capture and assess individual and group data positions us as a differentiating provider in this segment.  The ability to capture member data provides the tool of accountability to managing individual care, and enables us to provide validation of our products and services.
 
Integrated Hardware / Software / CareServices Providers
 
Overview – Providers combining diagnostic monitoring, data analysis and healthcare services are those most similar to our business model.  The most notable of this segment have focused on providing services to cardiac monitoring.  Examples include:
 
·
Alere
   
·
CardioCom
   
·
LifeWatch
 
Strengths – By leveraging multiple competencies and services, providers in this segment have been able to deliver complementing solutions rather than components to the industry.  The segment has focused on high cost disease states, providing solutions that are fully reimbursed by Medicare and payer groups.
 
Weaknesses – The competitors in this market typically produce proprietary hardware components, and lack much of the product innovation and lowered prices made possible by traditional hardware providers.  While having success in monitoring cardiac conditions, offerings for diabetes and other chronic conditions have been less successful.  While physicians continue to support the use of this care strategy, providers are under significant pressure from payers to reduce the prices for their offerings.
 
Summary – This segment provides our most significant competition.  Pressure on pricing will continue to strain the relationship between payers and providers of these services, forcing them to innovate features and solutions.  This pressure also presents an opportunity for us to aggressively pursue the segment and become a means of growth via partnership or acquisition for those currently in the space.
 
 Dependence on Major Customers
 
During fiscal year 2013, there were three Chronic Illness Monitoring customers that each accounted for more than 10% of that segment’s revenue and combined represented 72% of total revenue as follows; Region Advisors, LLC 25%, CK8 Financial, LLC 24%, and Catamaran, Inc. 23%.  During fiscal year 2012, there was one Chronic Illness Monitoring customer, Colorado Choice, that accounted for more than 10% of that segment’s revenue and represented 28% of total revenue.  See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
Intellectual Property
 
Trademarks.  We have registered certain of our trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including ActiveCare™, ActiveOne™, and ActiveOne+™.  We also use certain trademarks, trade names, and logos that have not been registered.  We claim common law rights to these unregistered trademarks, trade names and logos.  We also own domain names, including www.activecare.com and www.activecaresys.com, for our primary trademarks and we claim ownership of certain unregistered copyright rights of our website content.  We rely as well on a variety of property rights that we license from third parties as described below.
 
Patents.  We own the exclusive, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide, transferable, sublicensable license of all rights conferred by the patents, patent applications, and provisional patent applications listed in the table below for the healthcare and personal safety industries/markets.
 
 
7

 
 
Patent or
Application No.
Country
Issue/Filing Date
Title of Patent
       
11/486,989
United States
Pending/
7/14/2006
Remote Tracking Device and System and Method for Two-Way Voice Communication Between Device and a Monitoring Center
       
11/486,991
United States
Pending/
7/14/2006
Remote Tracking System and Device with Variable Sampling
       
11/830,398
United States
Pending/
7/30/2007
Methods for Establishing Emergency Communications Between a Communications Device and a Response Center
       
12/614,242
United States
Pending/
11/6/2009
Systems and Devices for Emergency Tracking and Health Monitoring
       
61/827,454
United States
Pending/
5/24/2013
System and Method for Identifying, Tracking and Treating Chronic Illness Using Real-time Biometric Data
 
We obtained worldwide and exclusive rights to the patents and patent applications listed in the table below under a license agreement dated May 25, 2009.
 
Patent or
Application No.
Country
Issue Date
Title of Patent
       
6,044,257
United States
March 28, 2000
Panic Button Phone
       
6,636,732
United States
October 21, 2003
Emergency Phone with Single Button Activation
       
6,226,510
United States
May 1, 2001
Emergency Phone for Automatically Summoning Multiple Emergency Response Services
       
7,092,695
United States
August 15, 2006
Emergency Phone with Alternate Number Calling Capability
       
7,251,471
United States
July 31, 2007
Emergency Phone with Single Button Activation
      
     We were granted worldwide, non-exclusive rights to patents and patent applications listed in the table below under a license agreement dated May 15, 2010.
 
Patent or Application No.
Country
Issue Date
Title of Patent
       
10/588.833
United States
Pending 08/09/06
Nanostructures Containing Metal-Semiconductor Compounds
       
PCT/US2007/008540
International
Pending 04/06/07
Nanoscale Wires Methods and Devices
       
PCT/US2007/024222
International
Pending 11/20/06
Millimeter-Long Nanowires
       
PCT/US2007/021602
International
Pending 10/10/07
Liquid Films Containing Nanostructured Materials
 
Trade Secrets.  We own certain intellectual property, including trade secrets, that we seek to protect, in part, through confidentiality agreements with employees and other parties, although some employees who are involved in research and development activities have not entered into these agreements. Even where these agreements exist, there can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known to or independently developed by competitors.
 
Regulatory Matters
 
The testing, manufacture, distribution, advertising and marketing of medical devices in the United States is subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governmental authorities, including the Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”).  Certain of our products may be subject to and required to receive regulatory clearances or approvals, as the case may be, before we may market them. Under United States law, a medical device is an article, which, among other things, is intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease, in man or other animals (see Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (the “Act”) § 201(h)).
 
Devices are subject to varying levels of regulatory control, the most comprehensive of which requires that a clinical evaluation be conducted before a device receives clearance or approval for commercial distribution. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes. Class I devices are relatively simple and can be manufactured and distributed with general controls. Class II devices are somewhat more complex and require greater scrutiny. Class III devices are new and frequently help sustain life.  Examples of the varying levels of regulatory control are described in the following paragraphs.
 
 
8

 
 
In the United States, a company generally can obtain permission to distribute a new device in two ways – through a Section 510(k) premarket notification application (“510(k) submission”), or through a Section 515 premarket approval (“PMA”) application. The 510(k) submission applies to any device that is substantially equivalent to a “Predicate Device” (a device first marketed prior to May 28, 1976 or a device marketed after that date which was substantially equivalent to a pre-May 28, 1976 device). These devices are either Class I or Class II devices. Under the 510(k) submission process, the FDA will issue an order finding substantial equivalence to a Predicate Device and permitting commercial distribution of that device for its intended use. A 510(k) submission must provide information supporting its claim of substantial equivalence to the Predicate Device. The FDA permits certain low risk medical devices to be marketed without requiring the manufacturer to submit a premarket notification. In other instances, the FDA may not only require that a premarket notification be submitted, but also that such notification be accompanied by clinical data. If clinical data from human experiences are required to support the 510(k) submission, these data must be gathered in compliance with Integral Device Exemption (“IDE”) regulations for clinical trials performed in the United States. The FDA review process for premarket notifications submitted pursuant to section 510(k) should take about 90 days on average, but it can take substantially longer if the FDA has concerns. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the FDA will “clear” the device for marketing, in which case the device cannot be distributed in the United States. There is no guarantee that the FDA will deem the device subject to the 510(k) process, as opposed to the more time-consuming, resource intensive and problematic process described below.
 
The more comprehensive PMA approval process applies to a new device that is (a) not substantially equivalent to a Predicate Device or (b) to be used in supporting or sustaining life or preventing impairment. These devices are normally Class III devices and can only be marketed following approval of a PMA. For example, most implantable devices are subject to the PMA approval process. Two steps of FDA approval generally are required before a company can market a product in the U.S. that is subject to Section 515 PMA approval, as compared to a Section 510(k) clearance. First, a company must comply with IDE regulations in connection with any human clinical investigation of the device; however those regulations permit a company to undertake a clinical study of a “non-significant risk” device without formal FDA approval. Prior express FDA approval is required if the device is a significant risk device. If there is any doubt as to whether a device is a “non-significant risk” device, companies normally seek prior approval from the FDA. Second, the FDA must review a company’s PMA application, which contains, among other things, clinical information acquired under the IDE. The FDA will approve the PMA application if it finds there is reasonable assurance the device is safe and effective for its intended use. The PMA process takes substantially longer than the 510(k) process.
 
Even when a clinical study has been approved or cleared by the FDA or deemed approved, the study is subject to factors beyond a manufacturer’s control, including, but not limited to the fact that the institutional review board at a given clinical site might not approve the study, might decline to renew approval which is required annually, or might suspend or terminate the study before the study has been completed. The interim results of a study may also not be satisfactory, leading the sponsor to terminate or suspend the study on its own initiative or the FDA may terminate or suspend the study. There is no assurance that a clinical study at any given site will progress as anticipated; there may be an insufficient number of patients who qualify for or agree to participate in the study, or the investigator at the site may have priorities other than the study. Also, there can be no assurance that the clinical study will provide sufficient evidence to assure the FDA that the product is either (i) safe and effective, a prerequisite for FDA approval of a PMA, or (ii) substantially equivalent in terms of safety and effectiveness to a Predicate Device, a prerequisite for clearance under 510(k). Even if the FDA approves or clears a device, it may limit its intended uses in such a way that manufacturing and distributing the device may not be commercially feasible.
 
After clearance or approval to market is given, the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies, upon the occurrence of certain events, are authorized under various circumstances to require PMA post market surveillance and extended clinical follow up, the clearance or approval or require changes to a device, its manufacturing process or its labeling or additional proof that regulatory requirements have been met.
 
A manufacturer of a device approved through the PMA process is not permitted to make changes which could affect the device’s safety or effectiveness without first submitting a supplement application to its PMA and obtaining FDA approval for that supplement. In some instances, the FDA may require clinical trials to support a supplement application. A manufacturer of a device cleared through a 510(k) submission must submit another premarket notification if it intends to make a change or modification in the device that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, such as a significant change or modification in design, material, chemical composition, energy source or manufacturing process. Any change in the intended uses of a PMA device or a 510(k) device requires an approval supplement or cleared premarket notification. Exported devices are subject to the regulatory requirements of each country to which the device is exported, as well as certain FDA and other federal export requirements and possible restrictions.
 
 
9

 
 
We do not manufacture our own devices.  We have contracted with a third party to manufacture the device for us.  Manufacturers of medical devices are required to register with the FDA before they begin to manufacture devices for commercial distribution. As a result, any entity that manufactures products on our behalf will be subject to periodic inspection by the FDA for compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (“QSR”) requirements and other regulations. These regulations require us and our manufacturers to manufacture products and maintain documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing and control activities. Further, we are required to comply with various FDA and other agency requirements for labeling and promotion. The Medical Device Reporting regulations require that we provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence to reasonably suggest that a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or, if a malfunction were to occur, could cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. In addition, the FDA prohibits us from promoting a medical device for unapproved indications.
 
The FDA in the course of enforcing the Act may subject a company to various sanctions for violating FDA regulations or provisions of the Act, including, by way of example, requiring recalls, issuing Warning Letters, seeking to impose civil money penalties, seizing devices that the agency believes are non-compliant, seeking to enjoin distribution of a specific type of device or other product, seeking to revoke a clearance or approval, seeking disgorgement of profits and seeking to criminally prosecute a company and its officers and other responsible parties.
 
In the United States, HIPAA regulations require national standards for some types of electronic health information transactions and the data elements used in those transactions, security standards to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of health information and standards to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. Covered entities under HIPAA, which include health care organizations such as our clients, our employer clinic business model and our claims processing, transmission and submission services, are required to comply with the privacy standards, the transaction regulations and the security regulations. As a business associate of our clients who are covered entities, we are generally required by contract to comply with the HIPAA regulations as they pertain to handling of covered client data. However, the extension of these HIPAA obligations to business associates by law has created additional liability risks related to the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information.
 
Employees
 
As of September 30, 2013, we had 50 full-time and 2 part-time employees in the U.S. and 13 full-time employees in the Philippines.  None of these employees are represented by a labor union or subject to a collective bargaining agreement.  We have never experienced a work stoppage and our management believes that our relations with employees are good.
 
Additional Available Information
 
We maintain executive offices and principal facilities at 1365 West Business Park Drive, Orem, Utah, 84058.  Our telephone number is (877) 219-6050. We maintain a World Wide Website at www.activecare.com. The information on our website should not be considered part of this report.  We make available, free of charge at our corporate website, copies of our annual reports filed under the Exchange Act with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and all amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  We also provide copies of our Forms 8-K, 10-K, 10-Q, proxy and annual report at no charge to investors upon request.
 
All reports filed with the SEC are available free of charge through the SEC website at www.sec.gov.  In addition, the public may read and copy materials we have filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 450 Fifth St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.  
 
Item 1A.  Risk Factors  
 
We have identified the following important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward looking statements we may make from time to time.  We operate in a continually changing business environment in which new risk factors emerge from time to time.  We can neither predict these new risk factors, nor can we assess the impact, if any, of these new risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement.  If any of these risks, or combination of risks, actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously and materially harmed, and the trading price of our common stock could decline.
 
Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against our policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information.  Accordingly, stockholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst, regardless of the content of the statement or report.  Furthermore, we do not confirm financial forecasts or projections issued by others.  Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts, or opinions, such reports are not the responsibility of ActiveCare.
 
 
10

 
 
Because of our history of accumulated deficits, recurring losses and negative cash flows from operating activities, we must improve profitability and may be required to obtain additional funding if we are to continue as a “going concern.”
 
We incurred negative cash flows from operating activities and recurring net losses in fiscal years 2013 and 2012.  We had negative working capital at the end of each of those years.  As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, our accumulated deficit was $63,311,088 and $37,359,214, respectively.  These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements included with this report do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  In order for us to remove substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, we must improve gross margins, generate positive cash flows from operating activities and obtain the necessary debt or equity funding to meet our projected capital investment requirements.  Subsequent to year end, we completed the sale of $3,120,000 of 8% Series F variable rate convertible preferred stock, converted $2,241,195 of debt and accrued interest to common stock,  converted $573,868 of debt and accrued interest to Series F variable rate convertible preferred stock, and $83,473 debt and accrued interest to Series E preferred stock.  However, we require additional funding to remove the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  If we are unable to increase revenues or obtain additional financing, we will be unable to continue the development of our products and we may have to cease operations.
 
Our financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that we will continue as a going concern.  Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued their report dated January 13, 2014, which includes an explanatory paragraph stating that our recurring losses, among other things, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  It has been necessary to rely upon loans and the sale of our equity securities to sustain operations.  Our management anticipates that we may require additional capital over the next 12 months to fund ongoing operations.  There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain such funds, or obtain them on satisfactory terms, and that such funds would be sufficient.  If such additional funding is not obtained, we may be required to scale back or discontinue operations.
 
Our profitability depends upon achieving success in our future operations through implementing our business plan, increasing sales, and expanding our customer and distribution bases, for which there can be no assurance given.
 
Profitability depends upon many factors, including the success of our marketing program, our ability to identify and obtain the rights to additional products to add to our existing product line, expansion of distribution and customer base, maintenance or reduction of expense levels and the success of our business activities.  For a discussion of risks related to our accumulated deficits, please see the preceding risk factor. We anticipate that we will generate operating income in the next twelve months.  Our ability to achieve profitable operations will depend on our success in developing and maintaining an adequate marketing and distribution system.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and maintain adequate marketing and distribution resources.  If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to materially curtail or cease operations.
 
Our products are not based entirely on technology that is proprietary to us, which means that we do not have a technological advantage over our competitors, and that we must rely on the owners of the proprietary technology that is the basis for our products to protect that technology.  We have no control over such protection.
 
Our ActiveOne and ActiveOne+ products utilize technology based in part on patents that have been licensed to us for use within our markets.  Our success in adding to our existing product line will depend on our ability to acquire or otherwise license competitive technologies and products and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others, both in the United States and internationally.  No assurance can be given that any licenses required from third parties will be made available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.  If we do not obtain such licenses, we could encounter delays in product introductions while we attempt to adopt alternate sources.  We could also find that the manufacture or sale of products requiring such licenses is not possible.  Litigation may be necessary to defend against claims of infringement, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us, or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others.  Such litigation could have an adverse and material impact on us and on our operations.
 
Our products are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with the protection of intellectual property and related proprietary rights. We believe that our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, maintain trade secrets and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others in the United States and in other countries.
 
We own or have license rights under several patents; we have also applied for several additional patents and those applications are awaiting action by the United States Patent Office. There is no assurance those patents will issue or that when they do issue they will include all of the claims currently included in the applications. Even if they do issue, those new patents and our existing patents must be protected against possible infringement. The enforcement of patent rights can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. The scope and enforceability of patent claims are not systematically predictable with absolute accuracy. The strength of our own patent rights depends, in part, upon the breadth and scope of protection provided by the patent and the validity of our patents, if any.
 
 
11

 
 
Our inability to obtain or to maintain patents on our key products could adversely affect our business.
 
We own patents and have filed and intend to file additional patent applications in the United States and in key foreign jurisdictions relating to our technologies, improvements to those technologies and for specific products we may develop. We have also been licensed important rights under patents issued to third parties. There can be no assurance that patents will issue on any of these applications or that, if issued, any patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. The prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement of patent rights are expensive, and the expense may adversely affect our profitability and the results of our operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that the rights afforded by any patents will guarantee proprietary protection or competitive advantage. Our success will also depend, in part, on our ability to avoid infringing the patent rights of others. We must also avoid any material breach of technology licenses we may enter into with respect to our new products and services. Existing patent and license rights may require us to alter the designs of our products or processes, obtain licenses or cease certain activities. In addition, if patents have been issued to others that contain competitive or conflicting claims and such claims are ultimately determined to be valid and superior to our own, we may be required to obtain licenses to those patents or to develop or obtain alternative technology. If any licenses are required, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any necessary licenses on commercially favorable terms, if at all. Any breach of an existing license or failure to obtain a license to any technology that may be necessary in order to commercialize our products may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Litigation that could result in substantial costs may also be necessary to enforce patents licensed or issued to us or to determine the scope or validity of third-party proprietary rights. If our competitors prepare and file patent applications in the United States that claim technology also claimed by us, we may have to participate in proceedings declared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to determine priority of invention, which could result in substantial costs, even if we eventually prevail. An adverse outcome could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require disputed rights to be licensed from third parties or require that we cease using such technology.
 
We also rely on trade secrets laws to protect portions of our technology for which patent protection has not yet been pursued or is not believed to be appropriate or obtainable.
 
These laws may protect us against the unlawful or unpermitted disclosure of any information of a confidential and proprietary nature, including but not limited to our know-how, trade secrets, methods of operation, names and information relating to vendors or suppliers and customer names and addresses. We intend to protect this unpatentable and unpatented proprietary technology and processes, in addition to other confidential and proprietary information in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, collaborative partners, consultants and certain contractors. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that we will have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets and other confidential and proprietary information will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered or reverse-engineered by competitors.
 
Recent changes in insurance and health care laws have created uncertainty in the health care industry.
 
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, each enacted in March 2010, generally known as the Health Care Reform Law, significantly expanded health insurance coverage to uninsured Americans and changed the way health care is financed by both governmental and private payers. We expect expansion of access to health insurance to increase the demand for our products and services, but other provisions of the Health Care Reform Law could affect us adversely. Additionally, further federal and state proposals for health care reform are likely. We cannot predict what further reform proposals, if any, will be adopted, when they may be adopted, or what impact they may have on us.
 
The collection, retention and disclosure of personal information and patient health information is regulated by law and subjects us and our business associates to potential liability for unauthorized disclosure and other use of such information.
 
State, federal and foreign laws, such as the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), regulate the confidentiality of sensitive personal information and the circumstances under which such information may be released. These measures may govern the disclosure and use of personal and patient medical record information and may require users of such information to implement specified security measures, and to notify individuals in the event of privacy and security breaches. Evolving laws and regulations in this area could restrict the ability of our customers to obtain, use or disseminate patient information, or could require us to incur significant additional costs to re-design our products in a timely manner to reflect these legal requirements, either of which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Other health information standards, such as regulations under HIPAA, establish standards regarding electronic health data transmissions and transaction code set rules for specified electronic transactions, for example, transactions involving claims submissions to third-party payers. These also continue to evolve and are often unclear and difficult to apply. In addition, under the federal Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), which was passed in 2009, some of our business that was previously only indirectly subject to federal HIPAA privacy and security rules became directly subject to such rules because we may serve as “business associates” to persons or entities that are subject to these rules. On January 17, 2013, the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services released a final rule implementing the HITECH Act and making certain other changes to HIPAA privacy and security requirements. Compliance with the rule was required by September 23, 2013, and increased the requirements applicable to some of our business. Failure to maintain the confidentiality of sensitive personal information in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements, or to abide by electronic health data transmission standards, could expose us to breach of contract claims, fines and penalties, costs for remediation and harm to our reputation.
 
 
12

 
 
Our industry is fragmented, and we experience intense competition from a variety of sources, some of which are better financed and better managed than we are.
 
We face, and will continue to face, competition in the Chronic Illness Monitoring market.  In addition, competition in the CareServices market is also significant.  Many, if not most, of our competitors and potential competitors are much larger and consequently have greater access to capital.  Moreover, many of our competitors have far greater name recognition and experience in the Chronic Illness Monitoring and CareServices industry.  There can be no assurance that competition from other companies will not render our products noncompetitive.
 
We are highly dependent on our executive officers and certain of our scientific, technical and operations employees.
 
We depend heavily on our executive officers and certain scientific, technical, and operations employees, including David Derrick (Chief Executive Officer) and Michael Acton (Chief Financial Officer).  As of the date of this Report, we do not have an employment agreement with Michael Acton.  The loss of services of any of these individuals could impede the achievement of our objectives.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain qualified executive, scientific, or technical personnel on acceptable terms.
 
We rely on third parties to manufacture our product line.
 
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the manufacture of our ActiveOne+ devices and Chronic Illness Monitoring supplies.  Consequently, we are dependent on these contract manufacturers for the production of existing products and will depend on third-party manufacturing resources to manufacture equipment and devices we may add to our product line in the future.  In the event we are unable to obtain or retain third-party manufacturing, we will not be able to continue operations as they relate to the sale of equipment and devices.
 
From time to time, we may be subject to expensive claims relating to product liability law; our ability to insure against this risk is limited.
 
The use of any of our existing or potential products in clinical settings may expose us to liability claims. These claims could be made directly by persons who assert that inaccuracies or deficiencies in their test results were caused by defects in our products.  Alternatively, we could be exposed to liability indirectly by being named as a third-party defendant in actions brought against companies or persons who have purchased our products.  We have obtained limited product liability insurance coverage and we intend to expand our insurance coverage on an as needed basis as sales revenue increases.  However, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to liability.  There can also be no assurance that we will be able to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance for any products added to our product line in the future.  A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Ineffective internal controls could impact our business and operating results.
 
Our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud.  Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements.  If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results may be harmed and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations.
 
 
13

 
 
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
 
Concentration of ownership among our existing executive officers, directors and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.
 
Our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders own, in the aggregate, approximately 55% of our outstanding common stock.  In addition, certain of our officers and all of our directors have been granted warrants to purchase common stock and convertible Series D and Series E preferred stock, all of which are exercisable as of the date of this Report.  The exercise of such warrants and preferred stock might also result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders.  As a result of the ownership of the shares currently held, their ownership and potential exercise of these options and preferred stock, these stockholders may be able to exercise significant control over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, amendment of our certificate of incorporation and approval of significant corporate transactions and will have significant control over our management and policies.  The interests of these stockholders may not be consistent with the interests of all other stockholders.
 
This control or the potential for such control may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers, delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in management, or limiting the ability of our other stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in our best interests.
 
Penny stock regulations may impose certain restrictions on marketability of our securities.
 
The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) of less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions.  As a result, our common stock is subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their spouse).  For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase.  Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a risk disclosure document mandated by the SEC relating to the penny stock market.  The broker-dealer must also disclose the commission payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market.  Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.  Consequently, the “penny stock” rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and may affect the ability of investors to sell our securities in the secondary market and the price at which such purchasers can sell any such securities. 
 
Investors should be aware that, according to the SEC, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse.  Such patterns include:
 
Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;
   
Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;
   
“Boiler room” practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons;
   
Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and
   
The wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.
 
Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market.
 
 
14

 
 
Our stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid for them.
 
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including:

Market conditions or trends in our industry or the economy as a whole and, in particular, in the retail sales environment;
   
Timing of promotional events;
   
Changes in key personnel;
   
Entry into new markets;
   
Announcements by us or our competitors of new product offerings or significant acquisitions;
   
Actions by competitors;
   
The level of expenses associated with new product development and marketing;
   
Changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of competitors;
   
The public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or third parties, including our filings with the SEC;
   
The financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections;
   
Changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our common stock, our failure to meet these estimates or failure of those analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our common stock;
   
The development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock;
   
Future sales of our common stock by our officers, directors and significant stockholders;
   
Other events or factors, including those resulting from war, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or responses to these events; and
   
Changes in accounting principles.
 
In addition, the stock markets have recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many retail companies.  In the past, stockholders in some companies have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility.  If we were involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our resources, and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.
 
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts.
 
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our Company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:
 
·
Authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock; and
   
·
Establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
 
These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay, or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our Company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.
 
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
 
Any future trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business.  We do not currently have and may never obtain research coverage by securities and industry analysts.  If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price for our common stock would be negatively impacted.  If we obtain securities or industry analyst coverage and if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our common stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline.  If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.  
 
 
15

 
 
We do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.
 
The continued operation and expansion of our business will require substantial funding.  Accordingly, we do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on shares of our common stock for the foreseeable future.  Any determination to pay dividends on the common stock in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, including our senior secured credit facility and other indebtedness we may incur, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.  No dividends may be paid on the common stock unless and until all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the preferred stock.  Accordingly, if you purchase or own shares of our common stock, realization of a gain on your investment will depend on the appreciation of the price of our common stock, which may never occur. Investors seeking cash dividends in the foreseeable future should not purchase our common stock.
 
Item 2.  Properties
 
We lease office facilities of approximately 17,350 square feet located at 1365 West Business Park Drive, Orem, Utah, 84058.  This lease expires in July 2018 and the monthly rent is approximately $15,900 subject to annual adjustments.
 
Our Philippines office is located at Unit 606 Keppel Center, Cebu Business Park, Cebu City, Philippines.  The lease has a three-year term expiring in May 2014.  The monthly rent begins at 64,975 Philippine Pesos (approximately $1,300) per month, with 10% annual increases.
 
Management believes the facilities described above are adequate to accommodate presently expected growth and needs of our operations.  As we continue to grow, additional facilities or the expansion of existing facilities likely will be required.
 
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
 
On December 18, 2012, iLife Technologies, Inc. filed a lawsuit against nine companies, including ActiveCare, for patent infringement in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas.  The lawsuit alleged infringement of seven patents owned by iLife purportedly related to the use of accelerometers in devices used to monitor the status of a user.  In May 2013, ActiveCare entered into a settlement agreement and patent license agreement with iLife Technologies, Inc. and an agreed motion was filed to dismiss all claims of the lawsuit.  The final payment required by the settlement agreement and patent license patent agreement was made in December 2013.
 
PART II
 
Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Market Information
 
Our common stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “ACAR.OB.”  The following table sets forth the range of high and low market prices of our common stock as reported for the periods indicated.  The information is available online at http://finance.yahoo.com.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we implemented a 10-for-1 reverse common stock split.  The data below have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the reverse stock split.
 
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2012
 
High
   
Low
 
                 
First Quarter
 
$
   5.20    
$
  2.00
 
Second Quarter
 
$  
  4.90    
$
  1.10
 
Third Quarter
 
$  
  1.30    
$
  0.50
 
Fourth Quarter
 
   0.90    
$
  0.30
 
                 
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2013
 
High
   
Low
 
                 
First Quarter
 
   1.50    
$
  0.40
 
Second Quarter
 
$
   2.80    
$
  0.80
 
Third Quarter
 
$
  11.00    
$
  0.90
 
Fourth Quarter
 
$  
  1.62    
$
  0.66
 
 
Holders
 
As of January 13, 2014, there were approximately 2,400 holders of record of our common stock and 32,860,314 shares of common stock outstanding. We have granted options and warrants for the purchase of approximately 7,094,000 shares of common stock.  We have issued and outstanding 70,539 shares of Series E preferred stock, 45,000 shares of Series D preferred stock, and 7,803 shares of Series F preferred stock.
 
 
16

 
 
Dividends
 
Since incorporation, we have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock.  We do not anticipate declaring cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.   Our Series C and Series D preferred stock carry 8% annual dividend rates.  Our Series E preferred stock carries a 3.322% monthly dividend rate.  Subsequent to year-end we designated Series F preferred stock, which carries an 8% annual dividend rate until April 30, 2015, 16% from May 1, 2015 until July 31, 2015, 20% from August 1, 2015 until October 31, 2015, and 25% thereafter.
 
Dilution
 
The Board of Directors determines when and under what conditions and at what prices to issue stock.  In addition, a significant number of shares of common stock are reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock options and warrants.  The issuance of any shares of common stock for any reason will result in dilution of the equity and voting interests of existing stockholders. 
 
Transfer Agent and Registrar
 
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New York, NY 11219.
 
Equity Compensation Plans
 
Under management agreements in fiscal years 2009, 2012, and 2013, we granted our Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Executive Officer equity compensation in the form of restricted stock and warrants for the purchase of common stock.  We have also granted warrants for the purchase of common stock to our directors.  The following table summarizes certain information concerning equity plan awards outstanding as of September 30, 2013.
 
Equity Compensation Plan Information
 
Plan Category(1)
 
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
     
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
warrants, and rights
   
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
the first column)
     
(#)
    ($)    
(#)
                         
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
 
                       -
    $
 
                 -
     
                 -
                       
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
    2,038,253           1.21        
                         
Totals    
2,038,253
(1)   $  
1.21
       

(1)       Includes 1,110,487 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants granted to our former chief executive officers, 92,000 shares to our Board of Directors, and 835,766 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants granted to officers.
 
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
 
The following discussion summarizes sales of our common stock and other equity securities without registration of the offer and sale of such securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities Act not previously reported by the Company.
 
 
17

 
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we issued the following shares of common stock without registration under the Securities Act:
 
·
130,021 shares valued at $163,927 as compensation for services to three independent consultants;
   
·
120,000 shares valued at $168,000 as compensation for a key employee as an incentive to work for the Company.  The stock vests according to the terms of the employment agreements;
   
·
350,000 shares valued at $350,000 for options exercised by employees;
   
·
150,000 shares valued at $187,500 for an employment contract extension with a key employee;
   
·
25,000 shares valued at $31,750 to medical advisory board members for services through September 2014;
   
·
25,000 shares valued at $31,750 for service provided by a board member;
   
·
102,500 shares as loan origination fees at a value of $133,100;
   
·
10,903,463 shares for the conversion of outstanding debt in the amount of $15,282,464;
   
·
166,200 shares valued at $225,300 to settle an accrued liability of $126,200;
   
·
100,000 shares for the conversion of 20,000 shares of Series D preferred stock;
   
·
50,000 shares for 10,000 shares of Series D preferred stock canceled for loan origination fees to an unrelated party;
   
·
98,452 shares valued at $135,233 as dividends accrued for Series C and Series D preferred stock-holders;
   
·
1,313,334 shares valued at $1,842,334 for cash receipt of $985,000;
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we issued the following shares of Series D preferred stock without registration under the Securities Act:
 
·
22,000 shares for a bonus to an officer, the value on the date of grant was $137,500;
   
·
1,893 shares for dividends on Series C preferred stock, the value on the date of grant was $13,610;
   
·
2,683 shares for dividends on Series D preferred stock, the value on the date of grant was $18,426;
   
·
80,717 shares for consulting services by an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, which were previously accrued in the amount of $542,878;
   
·
40,669 shares issued in exchange for 203,345 shares of common stock;
   
·
2,055 shares for prepaid service to an entity controlled by an officer, the value on the date of issuance was $14,899.
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we issued the following shares of Series E preferred stock without registration under the Securities Act:
 
·
61,723 shares for the conversion of outstanding debenture loans and accrued interest of $614,765.
 
The shares of common stock and preferred stock issued in the above transactions were not registered under the Securities Act in reliance upon exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
 
Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to help the reader better understand our Company, our operations and our present business environment.  This information is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the accompanying notes thereto contained in this report.
 
Recent Developments
 
We have financed operations primarily through short-term debt and the sale of our equity securities.  Accordingly, if our revenues continue to be insufficient to meet our needs, we will attempt to secure additional financing through traditional bank financing or through the sale of equity securities or debt instruments.  However, because of our current financial condition, our attempts may be unsuccessful in obtaining such financing or the amount of the financing obtained may be inadequate to continue to implement our plan of operations.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on satisfactory terms or at all, or raise funds through debt or equity offerings.  If we only have nominal funds with which to conduct our business activities, this will negatively impact the results of operations and our financial condition.
 
During fiscal year 2013, we sold the net assets and operations of our Reagents business segment.  Net consideration received was $184,318 in cash in exchange for net assets of $129,222, which were comprised of $33,069 of accounts payable, $82,959 of net receivables, $53,500 of net inventory, and $25,832 of net property and equipment.  The Company may receive additional annual payments of five percent of the net income of the purchaser, through the fifth anniversary, if revenue from the purchaser is at least $465,000 for the previous twelve-month period ending on the closing date anniversary.  The sale of the Reagent business allows us to focus on our Chronic Illness Monitoring and CareService segments.
 
 
18

 
 
Key Business Indicators
 
In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures.  The key measures for determining how our business is performing are net sales, gross profit margin and selling, general and administrative expenses.
 
Net Sales
 
Net sales constitute gross sales net of any returns and merchandise discounts.
 
Gross Profit
 
Gross profit is equal to our net sales minus our cost of revenues. Gross margin measures gross profit as a percentage of our net sales.  Cost of revenues includes the direct costs of purchased merchandise, commissions, distribution costs, freight costs and purchasing costs.
 
Our cost of revenues is substantially higher in higher volume quarters because cost of revenues generally increases as net sales increase.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses include administration, stock-based compensation (discussed below) and occupancy costs.  These expenses do not generally vary proportionately with net sales.  As a result, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales are usually higher in lower volume quarters and lower in higher volume quarters.
 
Stock-based Compensation Expense
 
During fiscal year 2013, we granted 1,579,632 shares of common stock, 482,130 shares of Series D preferred stock, and 2,086,967 common stock purchase warrants to our consultants and employees. Stock-based compensation expense for fiscal year 2013 was approximately $3,447,000. See “Critical Accounting Policies” below.
 
Fiscal Year 2013 Compared to Fiscal Year 2012
 
Revenues
 
Net revenues for fiscal year 2013 were $11,400,000 compared to $1,059,000 for fiscal year 2012, an increase of $10,341,000 or 976%.  Revenues from Chronic Illness Monitoring were $9,739,000 for the fiscal year 2013, compared to $707,000 for fiscal year 2012.  The increase is due to significant new customers and improving our product and services.  Revenues from CareServices for fiscal year 2013 totaled $1,661,000, compared to $352,000 for fiscal year 2012.  The increase is due to having customers from the acquisition of Green Wire for a full fiscal year.
 
Cost of Revenues
 
Cost of revenues for fiscal year 2013 were $9,635,000, compared to $1,273,000 for fiscal year 2012, an increase of $8,362,000.  The increase in cost of revenues resulted primarily from expenses related to the growth of our revenue.  Chronic Illness Monitoring costs of revenue were $7,310,000 and CareServices costs of revenue were $2,325,000.
 
Gross Profit
 
Gross profit for fiscal year 2013 was $1,764,000, compared to a gross deficit for fiscal year 2012 of $214,000, an increase of $1,978,000.  The improvement in gross profit resulted primarily from Chronic Illness Monitoring revenue growth.  We expect gross profit to improve in fiscal year 2014 as we onboard more Chronic Illness Monitoring customers.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2013 were $11,040,000, compared to $8,856,000 for fiscal year 2012, an increase of $2,184,000 or 25%.  The increase was primarily due to sales expenses related to the Chronic Illness Monitoring revenue growth and investor relation expenses as we secured debt and equity financing.  We expect our selling, general and administrative expenses will increase as we increase our marketing efforts and secure additional financing.
 
 
19

 
 
Research and Development Expenses
 
Research and development expenses for fiscal year 2013 were $832,000, compared to $187,000 for fiscal year 2012.  The increase is primarily due to the development of the Chronic Illness Monitoring operation system.  We expect to continue investing in research and development as we develop new platforms for Chronic Illness Monitoring.
 
Loss on Derivatives Liability
 
Derivative loss for fiscal year 2013 was $333,000, compared to $2,104,000 for fiscal year 2012.  Derivative liabilities recorded as of September 30, 2013 include convertible debt instruments with variable conversion elements.  Derivative liabilities recorded as of September 30, 2012 included convertible debt instruments recorded as derivative liabilities due to insufficient remaining authorized shares for debt conversion, the exercise of outstanding options and the conversion of convertible preferred stock.  The derivative liabilities as of September 30, 2012 were eliminated during fiscal year 2013 due to the 10-for-1 reverse common stock split, which decreased the number of outstanding shares and convertible shares of “freestanding instruments,” which allows us to reserve sufficient shares to settle “freestanding instruments.”
 
Loss on Induced Conversion of Debt and Sale of Common Stock
 
During fiscal year 2013, we offered an induced conversion rate to all debt holders at a rate of $0.75 per share of common stock, which was below the market price of the stock.  Debt and accrued interest of $10,004,000 was converted to shares of common stock.  We also offered the private placement of common stock to existing investors at $0.75 per share, which was below the market price.  The difference between the offered price and the market price of all common stock issued was $9,356,000 and is recorded as a loss on induced conversion of debt and sale of common stock.  We believe this improved our balance sheet and positioned us to invest more resources in growing the Chronic Illness Monitoring business.
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense for fiscal year 2013 was $5,584,000, compared to $858,000 for fiscal year 2012.  The increase was primarily due to $9,511,000 of net debt financing received to grow the Chronic Illness Monitoring business.  The majority of debt was converted to shares of common stock as noted above in “Loss on Induced Conversion of Debt”.
 
Other Income and Expense
 
The loss on disposal of equipment for fiscal year 2013 was $200,000, compared to $0 for fiscal year 2012.  The increase was due to the disposal of assets in connection with the move of our corporate headquarters to Orem Utah.
 
Discontinued Operations
 
In June 2013, we sold the net assets and operations of the Reagents business segment of the Company to a third party for $184,318 in cash.  During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, we recognized a loss from discontinued operations of $5,312 and $145,990, respectively.
 
Net Loss
 
Net loss for fiscal year 2013 was $25,631,000, compared to $12,366,000 for fiscal year 2012 for the reasons described above.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our primary sources of liquidity are the proceeds from the sale of our equity securities and borrowings.  We have not historically financed operations from cash flows from operating activities.  We anticipate that we will continue to seek funding to supplement revenues from the sale of our products and services through the sale of equity securities and borrowings until we achieve positive cash flows from operating activities under our new business plan.
 
Our cash balance as of September 30, 2013 was $224,000.  At that time, we had a working capital deficit of $3,251,000, compared to a working capital deficit of $10,144,000 at September 30, 2012.  The increase in working capital is primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable due to an increase in Chronic Illness Monitoring revenue, the decrease in derivative liabilities, and the conversion of debt to equity.
 
Operating activities in fiscal year 2013 used cash of $8,945,000, compared to $2,948,000 in fiscal year 2012.  The increased cash used in operating activities was due to increased operating expenses of our Chronic Illness Monitoring segment, which had a significant revenue increase.
 
Investing activities in fiscal year 2013 used cash of $296,000, compared to $386,000 in fiscal year 2012.  The decreased use of cash in investing activities was due to no acquisitions being undertaken during fiscal year 2013.  During fiscal year 2012, we used $350,000 in the acquisition of 4G Biometrics, LLC.
 
 
20

 
 
Financing activities in fiscal year 2013 provided cash of $8,935,000, compared to $3,686,000 in fiscal year 2012. The increase in cash from financing activities is due to the increase in debt and equity financing during fiscal year 2013.
 
We had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2013 of $63,311,000, compared to $37,359,000 as of September 30, 2012.  Our total stockholders’ deficit at September 30, 2013 was $791,000 compared to $7,715,000 as of September 30, 2012.  These changes were primarily due to the induced conversion of debt to equity and our net loss in fiscal year 2013.
 
Going Concern
 
Although we had positive gross margin for fiscal year 2013, we incurred negative cash flows from operating activities and recurring net losses for fiscal years 2013 and 2013.  We had negative working capital at the end of each of those years.    As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, our accumulated deficit was $63,311,088 and $37,359,214, respectively.  These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements included in this Form 10-K do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
In order for us to remove substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, we must continue to improve gross profits, generate positive cash flows from operating activities and obtain the necessary debt or equity funding to meet our projected capital investment requirements.  Our management’s plans with respect to this uncertainty include raising additional capital by issuing equity securities and increasing sales of our services and products.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient capital or that revenues will increase rapidly enough to offset operating losses and repay our debts as they come due.  If we are unable to increase revenues or obtain additional financing, we will be unable to continue the development of our products and may have to cease operations.
 
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We are not a party to any off balance sheet arrangements.
 
Impact of Inflation
 
Our results of operations and financial condition are presented based on historical cost.  While it is difficult to accurately measure the impact of inflation due to the imprecise nature of the estimates required, we believe the effects of inflation, if any, on our results of operations and financial condition have been immaterial.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
We have reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and the future adoptions of any such pronouncements are not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or our results of operations.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
The following summary includes accounting policies that we deem to be most critical to our business.  Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:
 
·
It requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made, and
   
·
Changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected could have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
 
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
 
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities; revenues and expenses for the reporting periods.  By their nature, these estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.  On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability, revenue recognition, and income taxes.  We base our estimates on historical experience and other facts and circumstances that are believed to be reasonable and the results provide a basis for making judgments about the carrying values of the related assets and liabilities.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and these differences may be material.
 
In May 2013, we effected a 10-for-1 reverse common stock split.  The consolidated financial statements and notes for all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse common stock split.
 
We believe our accounting policies with  respect to fair value of financial instruments, concentrations of credit risk, allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, inventories, impairment of assets, and revenue recognition are critical to an understanding of our financial results as described below.
 
 
21

 
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature and liquidity of these financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value based on current market pricing models. We estimate that, based on current market conditions, the fair values of long-term debt obligations approximate their carrying values as of September 30, 2013.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
We have cash in bank accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.  We have not experienced any losses in these accounts.

In the normal course of business, we provide credit terms to its customers and requires no collateral.  We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition.  We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon management’s specific review and assessment of each account at the period end.  During fiscal year 2013, we had revenues from three significant Chronic Illness Monitoring customers which represented 72% of total revenue.  As of September 30, 2013 accounts receivable from significant customers represented 92% of total accounts receivable.  During fiscal year 2012, we had revenues from one significant Chronic Illness Monitoring customers which represented 28% of total revenues.  As of September 30, 2012 accounts receivable from significant customers represented 51% of total accounts receivable.
 
Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis.  Specific allowances are estimated by management based on certain assumptions and variables, including the customer’s financial condition, age of the customer’s receivables and changes in payment histories.  Accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible.  A receivable is considered to be past due if any portion of the receivable balance has not been received by the contractual payment date.  Interest is not charged on accounts receivable that are past due.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Chronic Illness Monitoring inventory consists of diabetic supplies.  Provisions, when required, are made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values.  Due to competitive pressures and technological innovation, it is possible that estimates of the net realizable value could change in the near term.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization are determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, typically three to seven years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the asset or the term of the lease.  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.  Upon the sale or disposal of property and equipment, any gains or losses are included in the results of operations.
 
Equipment Leased to Customers
 
Our leased equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  We amortize the cost of leased equipment on a straight-line basis over 36 months, which is the estimated useful life of the equipment.  Amortization of leased equipment is recorded as cost of sales.
 
Goodwill
 
Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for potential impairment at least annually.  The identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of our reporting units.  The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which primarily incorporate management assumptions about expected future cash flows.  Future cash flows can be affected by changes in industry or market conditions.  Goodwill was not impaired during fiscal years 2013 or 2012.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
Purchased intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets, which range from two to twenty years.  Long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable.  Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition.  No long-lived assets were considered to be impaired during fiscal years 2013 or 2012.
 
 
22

 
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Our revenue has historically been from three sources: (i) sales of Chronic Illness Monitoring services and supplies; (ii) sales from CareServices; (iii) sales of medical diagnostic stains from our Reagents segment, which was sold during fiscal year 2013.  Information regarding revenue recognition policies relating to our remaining business segments is contained in the following paragraphs.
 
Chronic Illness Monitoring
 
We began chronic illness monitoring sales through our acquisition of 4G Biometrics, LLC in the quarter ended March 31, 2012.  We recognize Chronic Illness Monitoring revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer exists, title passes to the customer, prices are fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.
 
Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included as part of net revenues.  The related freight costs and supplies directly associated with shipping products to customers are included as a component of cost of revenues.  Sales of Chronic Illness Monitoring products and services do not contain multiple deliverables.
 
We enter into agreements with insurance companies, disease management companies, and self-insured companies (collectively, customers) to lower medical expenses by distributing diabetic testing supplies to their customers or employees (members) and monitoring their test results.  Customers are obligated to pay for the supplies at the time of shipment and cash is due from these customers as the product is deployed to the members.  The term of these contracts are generally one year and, unless terminated by either party, will automatically renew for another year.  Collection terms are net 30-days after claims are submitted.  The Chronic Illness Monitoring sales for fiscal year 2013 were $9,738,988.
 
To qualify for the recognition of revenue at the time of sale, the following must exist:
 
·
The price to the contracted self-insured company is fixed or determinable at the date of sale.
   
·
The self-insured company has paid, or is obligated to pay us within terms.
   
·
The self-insured company’s obligation to the Company would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product.
   
·
Once the product is shipped, the end user does not have the right of return.
 
CareServices
 
 
“CareServices” include contracts in which we provide monitoring services to end users and sell devices to distributors.  We typically enter into contracts on a month-to-month basis with customers (members) that use our CareServices.  However, these contracts may be cancelled by either party at any time with 30-days notice.  Under our standard contract, the device becomes billable on the date the member orders the product, and remains billable until the device is returned to us.  We recognize revenue on devices at the end of each month that CareServices have been provided.  In those circumstances in which payment is received in advance, the Company records these payments as deferred revenue.
 
We recognize CareServices revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer exists, title passes to the customer, prices are fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.  Shipping and handling fees are included as part of net revenues.  The related freight costs and supplies directly associated with shipping products to members are included as a component of cost of revenues.  All CareServices sales are made with net 30-day payment terms.
 
To qualify for the recognition of revenue at the time of sale, the following must exist:
 
·
The price to the buyer is fixed or determinable at the date of sale.
   
·
The buyer has paid or the buyer is obligated to pay within terms, and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product.
   
·
The buyer’s obligation would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product.
   
·
The buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided by us.
   
·
We do not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer.
   
·
The amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated and are not significant.
 
 
23

 
 
The vast majority of sales for CareServices are service revenues.  Because equipment sales are not material, we present services and equipment sales together in the accompanying financial statements.
 
Our distributors are not required to maintain specified amounts of product on hand or make minimum purchases to maintain distributor status.  Distributors have no stock rotation rights or additional rights of return.  Revenues from products sold with long-term service contracts are recognized ratably over the expected life of the contract.  Revenues are recorded net of sales returns and discounts. There are no significant judgments or estimates associated with the recording of revenues.
 
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
 
Certain written and oral statements made by us in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act).  Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and may contain words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” or words or phrases of similar meaning.  In our reports and filings we may make forward looking statements regarding our expectations about future sales growth, future training and consulting sales activity, renewal of existing contracts, anticipated expenses, the adequacy of existing capital resources, projected cost reduction and strategic initiatives, expected levels of depreciation and amortization expense, expectations regarding tangible and intangible asset valuation expenses, future compliance with the terms and conditions of our debt obligations, the expected repayment of our liabilities in future periods, expectations regarding income tax expenses as well as tax assets and credits and the amount of cash expected to be paid for income taxes, estimated capital expenditures, and cash flow estimates used to determine the fair value of long-lived assets.  These, and other forward-looking statements, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.  These risks and uncertainties are disclosed from time to time in reports filed by us with the SEC, including reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K.  Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the matters discussed in Item 1A of this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, entitled “Risk Factors.”  
 
The risks included here are not exhaustive.  Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance.  Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment.  New risk factors may emerge and it is not possible for our management to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any single factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements.  Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
 
The market price of our common stock has been and may remain volatile.  In addition, the stock markets in general have experienced increased volatility.  Factors such as quarter-to-quarter variations in revenues and earnings or losses and our failure to meet expectations could have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock.  In addition, the price of our common stock can change for reasons unrelated to our performance.  Due to our low market capitalization, the price of our common stock may also be affected by conditions such as a lack of analyst coverage and fewer potential investors.
 
Forward-looking statements are based on management’s expectations as of the date made, and we do not undertake any responsibility to update any of these statements in the future except as required by law.  Actual future performance and results will differ and may differ materially from that contained in or suggested by forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC.
 
Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
The following consolidated financial statements are included beginning on page F-1 of this report:
 
 
Page
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
F-2
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-3
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-5
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-6
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-8
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-10
 
 
24

 
 
Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
During the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, there were no: (i) disagreements with our independent registered public account firm on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to such firm’s satisfaction, would have caused the independent registered public account firm to make reference to the subject matter thereof in connection with their reports for such years; or (ii) reportable events, as described under Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, except for the material weaknesses noted in Item 9A.
 
Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.  During the audit process, we identified material weaknesses discussed below in the Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
 
Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
 
 
(i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
 
 
(ii)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

 
(iii)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
 
In the course of management's assessment, it identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting:
 
Control Environment
 
We did not maintain an effective control environment for internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, we concluded that we did not have appropriate controls in the following areas:
 
·
Ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.
   
·
Ineffective controls over the segregation of incompatible duties of various accounting functions.
   
·
Ineffective controls over the review and approval of manual journal entries.
 
Financial Reporting Process 
 
We did not maintain an effective financial reporting process to prepare financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Specifically, we initially failed to appropriately account for and disclose the valuation and recording of certain derivatives, equity and financing arrangements.
 
 
25

 
 
We are in the process of improving our internal control over financial reporting in an effort to eliminate these material weaknesses through improved supervision and training of our staff, but additional effort and staffing is needed to fully remedy these deficiencies. Our management, audit committee, and directors will continue to work with outside advisors to ensure that our controls and procedures become adequate and effective.
 
This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report Form 10-K.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
During fiscal year 2013, we hired additional finance and accounting personnel to improve internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act).
 
Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls
 
The effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting, including ours, is subject to inherent limitations, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing, operating, and evaluating the controls and procedures, and the inability to completely eliminate misconduct. Accordingly, any system of internal control over financial reporting, including ours, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable, not absolute assurances. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. We intend to continue to monitor and upgrade our internal controls as necessary or appropriate for our business, but cannot assure you that such improvements will be sufficient to provide us with effective internal control over financial reporting.
 
Item 9B.  Other Information
 
None.
 
PART III
 
Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
Set forth below are the name, age, position and a description of the business experience of each of our executive officers, directors and other key employees as of September 30, 2013.
 
Name
 
Age
 
Position
         
David G. Derrick
 
60
 
Chairman (Director) and Chief Executive Officer
James G. Carter
 
74
 
Director
William K. Martin
 
70
 
Director
Jack J. Johnson
 
71
 
Director
Robert J. Welgos
 
75
 
Director
Michael G. Acton
 
50
 
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary-Treasurer
 
David G. Derrick – Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
 
Mr. Derrick has been our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors since July 2012.  From February 2001 until June 30, 2011, Mr. Derrick was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SecureAlert, our former parent corporation.  Prior to joining SecureAlert, Mr. Derrick occupied directorship and management positions in other companies.  From 1979 to 1982, Mr. Derrick was a faculty member at the University of Utah, College of Business.  Mr. Derrick graduated from the University of Utah with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and a Masters in Business Administration degree with an emphasis in Finance.  Our Board of Directors believes Mr. Derrick’s long association with our business and its development and his long support of the Company uniquely qualify him to serve as our principal executive officer and Chairman.
 
James G. Carter - Director
 
Mr. Carter joined our board in September 2008.  He is the founder and principal of J. Carter Wine & Spirits, Inc. (1989-2002) and is a director and former president of White Beeches Golf & Country Club since 1990.  Mr. Carter’s business experience includes Vice President of Sales & Marketing (North America and Caribbean) for Suntory International Corp. (1981-1989), National Sales Director Wines for Austin Nichols & Company, Inc. (1975-1980).  He is a former Councilman and Council President for the Township of Washington (Bergen County, New Jersey).  He retired in 2000.  Mr. Carter attended Villanova University. Mr. Carter has a very strong sales and marketing background with Suntory International Corp. and Austin Nichols & Company.  We believe that Mr. Carter’s experiences in starting, owning, and operating his own business and his extensive sales experience, qualify him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors as we continue to develop our distribution networks and design our marketing and sales programs.
 
 
26

 
 
William K. Martin - Director
 
Mr. Martin joined our board in September 2008.  He is a founder/partner/broker of Commerce CRG, and has served as its managing director from 1993 through the present, as well as acting as the Associate Broker in the firm’s Park City, Utah, office since 2007.  Commerce CRG is a commercial real estate and management business, and is an independently owned and operated member of the Cushman & Wakefield Alliance, which focuses on commercial real estate and management. Mr. Martin has also been a board member of a number of national and international real estate service firms.  Mr. Martin has also been active in industry organizations and is currently a member of the Economic Development Corporation of Utah and sits on that organization’s executive board.  Mr. Martin has a Bachelor of Science degree from Utah State University in Applied Statistical and Computer Science and has earned the rank of Captain in the United States Air Force (retired).  Mr. Martin has a very strong sales and marketing background with Commerce CRG and Cushman Wakefield.  Mr. Martin’s qualifications to serve on our board include his experience as a member of the State of Utah’s Economic Development board which gives him insight into governmental affairs and government relations, and his sales experience, assisting us we begin to bring our products and services to market and establish our distribution channels.
 
Jack J. Johnson – Director
 
Mr. Johnson joined our board in October 2008.  In 1976, he founded the Jack Johnson Company, a land planning, civil engineering and architectural company specializing in residential and resort communities.  He has served as President of that company since its inception.  He also formed Land Equity Partners, a residential subdivision development company, and Resort Development Services, a company focusing on development of hotels and condominiums.  He received a degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois in the late 1960s, and is a licensed civil engineer in several states.  His qualifications to serve on our board include his engineering background, which will help as we enter into research and development contracts related to our products and service solutions.  He is also well qualified as a result of his extensive business experience and sales expertise.
 
Robert J. Welgos – Director
 
Mr. Welgos joined our Board of Directors in June 2009.  He has a BS in engineering from the Newark College of Engineering (1962), and worked for 38 years with Allied Signal Corp (now Honeywell International), in various technical department management positions, including being responsible for operations of Customer Technical Service Dept., Design Engineering, Testing Laboratories, and Process Laboratories.  He also served as the Manager, North American Distributor Sales and Director of International Operations, where he established distribution networks throughout the Pacific Rim and South America.  During this period, he was instrumental in the creation of joint ventures with Lucky Goldstar in Korea and Japan Synthetic Rubber in Japan.  Mr. Welgos retired from Allied Signal Corp in 2000.  Mr. Welgos is the Chairman of our board’s Audit Committee.  Among other things, Mr. Welgos’ education and extensive experience in the industries described above qualify him to advise our Company in our research and development agenda and customer service solutions.  In addition, his experience in Asia is important as we source our products and manufacturing.
 
Michael G. Acton Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 
Mr. Acton joined us as Secretary-Treasurer at the time of our incorporation.  He has over 25 years of accounting experience in both the public and private sector and has been our Chief Financial Officer since June 2008. Mr. Acton is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Utah and is a member of the AICPA and the UACPA. Mr. Acton served 10 years as the Secretary-Treasurer and as the Chief Financial Officer of SecureAlert, where he was responsible for numerous regulatory and fiscal decisions along with Corporate Governance issues. Mr. Acton's focus is on improving the Company’s financial organization, processes and reporting. He has significant knowledge and experience in business planning, financial planning, and cash flow improvement and with senior level financial matters such as acquisitions, investor relations, risk management and SEC reporting. He graduated from the University of Utah with a Masters of Professional Accountancy in June 1990 and received his Bachelors of Science in Accounting from the University of Utah in June 1989.
 
Compensatory Arrangement with Principal Executive Officer
 
On July 12, 2012, we entered into a written Employment Agreement containing compensation and other terms related to David G. Derrick’s appointment as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors.  The term of the Employment Agreement is two years. The term and the employment of Mr. Derrick will continue for successive one-year periods unless terminated prior to the expiration of the current term by either the Company or Mr. Derrick.
 
 
27

 
 
The compensation payable to Mr. Derrick under the Employment Agreement includes a base salary of $300,000 per year plus $15,000 of business expense reimbursement per month.  The Company also granted Mr. Derrick 80,000 Series D preferred shares as a signing bonus, however according to the agreement such shares cannot be converted into Common Stock until the Company has 20,000 members. The Company recognized $320,000 of compensation expense due to the vesting of the Series D preferred stock during fiscal year 2013.  The Employment Agreement also includes the grant of an option to purchase 1,000,000 shares common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, vesting at the rate of 100,000 shares for every 5,000 members added by the Company during Mr. Derrick’s employment by the Company.  During fiscal year 2013, $782,885 was recorded as deferred compensation due to the issuance of the options.  $660,140 was recognized as compensation expense, and the remaining value will be amortized over the expected period of certain milestones reached.    During fiscal year 2013, the Company also granted Mr. Derrick a $350,000 bonus for option exercises for service for fiscal year 2013 and 2014.  $175,000 of the bonus was recognized as compensation expense, and $175,000 was recorded as deferred compensation and will be amortized through fiscal year 2014
 
Director Compensation
 
The table below summarizes the compensation we paid to our outside directors for their services as directors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.

 
Name
 
Fees Earned or
 Paid in Cash
   
Stock Awards
   
Option Awards
   
Non-Equity
 Incentive Plan
 Compensation
   
Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
   
All Other
 Compensation
   
Total
 
    ($)    
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
 
(a)
 
(b)
   
(c)
   
(d)
   
(e)
   
(f)
   
(g)
   
(h)
 
                                                         
David G. Derrick (1)
    --       --       --       --       --       --       --  
James G. Carter (2)
  $ 37,500     $ 33,512       --       --       --       --     $ 71,012  
William K. Martin (3)
  $ 37,500     $ 11,460       --       --       --       --     $ 48,960  
Robert J. Welgos (4)
  $ 37,500     $ 35,530       --       --       --       --     $ 73,030  
Jack Johnson (5)
  $ 37,500     $ 12,900       --       --       --       --     $ 50,400  
 
(1)
Mr. Derrick is Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. His compensation for the year ended September 30, 2013 is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, below. Mr. Derrick did not receive additional compensation for his service on the Board of Directors;
(2)
Mr. Carter received 17,753 shares of Series D preferred stock for $37,500 of BOD fees accrued and $33,512 of bonus;
(3)
Mr. Martin received 12,240 shares of Series D preferred stock for $37,500 of BOD fees accrued and $11,460 of bonus;
(4)
Mr. Welgos received 10,320 shares of Series D preferred stock and 25,000 shares of common for $37,500 of BOD fees accrued and $35,530 of bonus;
(5)
Mr. Johnson received 12,600 shares of Series D preferred stock for $37,500 of BOD fees accrued and $12,900 of bonus.
 
28

 
 
Item 11.  Executive Compensation
 
Chief Executive’s Management Agreement
 
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, we entered into a four-year management contract with our then Chief Executive Officer, James J. Dalton, with an effective term of October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2014.  Under that agreement, we paid Mr. Dalton for his services as follows:
 
·
400,000 restricted shares of common stock were granted to Mr. Dalton at a price of $4.60 per share, which vested immediately; and
   
·
Warrants for the purchase of 300,000 shares of common stock at a price of $5.00 per share.
 
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, we accelerated the above non-cash compensation to Mr. Dalton with total expense of $1,973,576. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, we also granted Mr. Dalton warrants to purchase 360,000 shares of common stock at a price of $4.00 per share for his services.  The exercise price of these warrants was reduced to $1.00 per share during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, which resulted in additional compensation expense of $55,671.
 
On October 17, 2011, we engaged David S. Boone as our Chief Executive Officer.  Mr. Boone assumed the post previously occupied by James J. Dalton, whose resignation took effect with the appointment of Boone.  Mr. Dalton continued to serve as the Chairman of our Board of Directors (until July 12, 2012 – see below).  On February 16, 2012, David S. Boone resigned as Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company to pursue other interests.  The Board of Directors then re-appointed James Dalton to the position of Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
 
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, we paid Mr. Boone for his services as follows:
 
·
$68,742 in cash for consulting services; and
   
·
Warrants for the purchase of 125,288 shares of common stock at a price of $4.40 per share.
 
On July 12, 2012, Mr. Dalton resigned as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company to pursue other interests.  The Board of Directors then appointed Mr. David G. Derrick to the position of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company.  The compensation payable to Mr. Derrick is described above and in the Summary Compensation Table, below.
 
Mr. Dalton continues to serve the Company as a consultant in the area of investor relations.  During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we paid Mr. Dalton the sum of $300,000 and $120,000, respectively, for his consulting services to the Company.  Mr. Dalton also received bonus payments ranging from 5% to 10% on financing he raised for the Company.
 
Section 162(m) Compliance
 
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), limits us to a deduction for federal income tax purposes of no more than $1,000,000 of compensation paid to certain executive officers in a taxable year. Compensation in excess of $1,000,000 may be deducted if it is “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of the Code.
 
Our Board of Directors has determined that the stock purchase warrants granted under management contracts as described above, with an exercise price at least equal to the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant should be treated as “performance-based compensation.”  Our Board of Directors believes that we should be able to continue to manage our executive compensation program for our Named Executive Officers, defined below, so as to preserve the related federal income tax deductions, although individual exceptions may occur.
 
 
29

 
 
Summary Compensation Table
 
The following table summarizes information concerning the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to, three of our top paid officers including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) during fiscal years 2013 and 2012 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) who were serving in such capacities as of September 30, 2013.

Name and
principal position
Year ended
September 30
 
Salary
   
Bonus
   
Stock awards
   
Option awards
   
Nonequity
incentive plan compensation
   
Nonqualified
 deferred
 compensation earnings
   
All other
 compensation
   
Total
 
     
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
   
($)
 
(a)
(b)
 
(c)
   
(d)
   
(e)
   
(f)
   
(g)
   
(h)
   
(i)
   
(j)
 
                                                   
James Dalton,
2012
    -       -     $ 1,380,000     $ 1,601,140       -       -     $ 7,153     $ 2,988,293  
PEO
                                                                 
                                                                   
David Boone,
2012
  $ 68,742       -       -     $ 343,378       -       -       -     $ 412,120  
PEO
                                                                 
                                                                   
David G. Derrick,
2013
  $ 300,000             $ 1,010,140       -       -       -     $ 33,343     $ 1,343,483  
PEO
2012
  $ 150,000       -     $ 320,000                                     $ 470,000  
                                                                   
Jeffery Peterson
2013
  $ 125,800       -     $ 685,378       -       -       -       -     $ 811,178  
Vice President of Finance
2012
  $ 77,200       -     $ 1,445,308       -       -       -       -     $ 1,522,508  
                                                                   
Darrell Meador,
2013
  $ 180,000       -     $ 282,299       -       -       -     $ 24,071     $ 486,370  
President of 4G Biometrics
2012
  $ 90,000       -       -       -       -       -       -     $ 90,000  
 
  (1) Column (i) includes long-term care insurance and other personal benefits. The amounts included in that column, representing premiums paid by us for the applicable insurance policies, include the following:
     
 
(2)
All amounts paid under the management agreement described above.  All amounts except those reported in column (c) and column (i) are non-cash amounts and represent stock or option grants.
 
   
Health Insurance
   
Dental, Vision,
& Term
Life Insurance
 
                 
David G. Derrick
  $ 31,937     $ 1,406  
                 
Darrell Meador
  $ 23,342     $ 729  
 
  
(3)
 
 
 
 
Amounts in column (e) represent non-cash compensation expense of stock grants based on the market value of the stock on the grant date.  During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, we granted Mr. Derrick non-cash compensation as described above.
 
During fiscal year 2013, we granted Mr. Peterson 115,717 shares of Series D preferred stock for sign up bonus and service provided valued at $685,378, and during fiscal year 2013, we granted Mr. Meador options to purchase 433,333 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share associated with the 4G acquisition.  We recorded the option valued at $382,388 as deferred compensation, $282,299 was recognized as compensation expense.  The remaining value of the option will be amortized over the terms of expected milestones reached.  During fiscal year 2013, we also granted 150,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Meador for extending his employment agreement to fiscal year 2015, $187,500 of value was recorded to deferred compensation.  The value will be amortized over fiscal year 2015.
 
 
30

 
 
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
 
The following table summarizes information regarding options and other equity awards owned by the Named Executive Officers as of September 30, 2013.
 
Name
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
   
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
   
Equity Inventive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
   
Option Exercise Price
 
Option Expiration Date
 
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
   
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
   
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
   
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
 
     (#)      (#)      (#)    
($)
 
(f)
   (#)    
($)
     (#)    
($)
 
   
Exercisable
   
Unexercisable
                                             
(a)
 
(b)
   
(c)
   
(d)
   
(e)
     
(g)
   
(h)
   
(i)
   
(j)
 
                                                             
David G. Derrick,
    50,000       -       -     $ 1.00  
9/29/2015
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
President and Chief
    34,100       -       -     $ 1.00  
11/3/2016
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
Executive Officer
    500,000       150,000       -     $ 1.00  
7/11/2017
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
                                                                   
James Dalton,
    360,000       -       -     $ 1.00  
10/3/2016
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
Former President and Chief
    225,000       -       -     $ 1.00  
6/21/2016
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
Executive Officer
    400,200       -       -     $ 1.00  
5/11/2014
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
                                                                   
David Boone,
                                                                 
Former President and Chief
    125,287       -       -     $ 4.40  
10/3/2016
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
Executive Officer
                                                                 
                                                                   
Michael G. Acton,
                                                                 
Chief Financial
    15,000       -       -     $ 1.00  
6/21/2016
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
Officer
                                                                 
                                                                   
Darrell Meador,
                                                                 
President of 4G
    86,666       346,667       -     $ 1.00  
6/20/2017
    -     $ -       -     $ -  
Biometrics
                                                                 
 
Options Exercised and Vested
 
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, warrants for the purchase of 2,086,967 shares of common stock were vested and options for the purchase of 875,000 shares of common stock were exercised.
 
Indemnification of Officers and Directors
 
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL.  We expect to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures such persons against the costs of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances.
 
In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty.
 
We entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors.  The indemnification agreements provide the executive officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL.
 
There is no pending litigation or proceeding naming any of our directors or officers to which indemnification is being sought, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director or officer.
 
 
31

 
 
Board of Directors
 
Election and Vacancies
 
Directors hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders and until their successors have been elected or appointed and duly qualified.  Vacancies on the board which are created by the retirement, resignation or removal of a director may be filled by the vote of the remaining members of the board, with such new director serving the remainder of the term or until his successor shall be elected and qualify.
 
Item 12.              Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The following tables set forth information as of January 13, 2014 (the “Table Date”) by:
 
·
each person or group who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;
   
·
each of our Named Executive Officers serving as of such date;
   
·
each of our directors; and
   
·
all of the executive officers and directors as a group.
 
Beneficial ownership for the purposes of the following table is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC.  These rules generally provide that a person is the beneficial owner of securities if such person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting thereof, or to dispose or direct the disposition thereof or has the right to acquire such powers within 60 days.  Common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Table Date is deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options.  These shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 32,860,314 shares of common stock outstanding as of the Table Date.  Except as disclosed in the footnotes to this table and subject to applicable community property laws, we believe that each stockholder identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power over all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by the stockholder.  Unless otherwise indicated in the table or footnotes below, the address for each beneficial owner is c/o ActiveCare, Inc., 1365 West Business Park Drive, Orem, Utah 84058.
 
               
5% Stockholders
             
       Amount and Nature        
     
Of Beneficial
       
Title of Class
Name and address of Beneficial Owner
 
Ownership
   
Percent of Class
 
               
Common
Advance Technology (1)
    4,966,046       14.91 %
 
154 Rock Hill Road
               
 
Spring Valley, NY 10977
               
                   
Common
Hillair Capital Investments L.P. (2)
    1,904,000       5.48 %
 
330 Primrose Road, Suite 660
               
 
Burlingame, CA 94010
               
                   
Executive Officers and Directors
               
         
       Amount and Nature          
     
Of Beneficial
         
Title of Class
Name and address of Beneficial Owner
 
Ownership
   
Percent of Class
 
Common
Jeffery Peterson (3)
    8,572,027       25.49 %
Common
David G. Derrick (4)
    6,883,530       20.58 %
Common
William K. Martin (5)
    735,596       2.24 %
Common
Michael G. Acton (6)
    516,127       1.57 %
Common
Darrell Meador (7)
    428,816       1.30 %
Common
Michael Jones (8)
    367,063       1.12 %
Common
David Lee (9)
    213,125       0.65 %
Common
James G. Carter (10)
    205,230       0.62 %
Common
Robert J. Welgos (11)
    179,763       0.55 %
Common
Jack Johnson (12)
    150,599       0.46 %
                   
All executive officers and directors as a group (10 persons)(13)
    18,251,876       54.57 %
 
 
32

 
 
(1)
Includes 4,516,046 shares of common stock, and options to purchase 450,000 shares of common stock, owned by Advanced Technology Investors LLC (“ATI”) and its related entity. By agreement, ATI may not vote or take delivery of common shares that would result in ATI becoming the beneficial owner of more than 9.99% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company at any given time
 
 (2)
Includes 1,904 shares of Series F preferred stock, which is convertible to 1,904,000 shares of common stock, owned by Hillair Capital Investments L.P. (“Hillair”).  By agreement, Hillair may not vote it’s common shares or common share equivalent in excess of 4.99% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company at any given time.
 
(3)
Includes 7,797,027 shares of common stock, 25,000 shares of Series D preferred stock, which is convertible to 125,000 shares of common stock, and options to purchase 650,000 shares of common stock, owned by entities that are controlled by Mr. Jeffery Peterson, our Vice President  of Finance.
 
(4)
Includes 6,299,430 shares of common stock and options to purchase 584,100 shares of common stock owned by entities that are controlled by Mr. David G. Derrick, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors.
 
(5)
Includes 712,896 shares of common stock and options to purchase 22,700 shares of common stock owned by entities that are controlled by Mr. William K. Martin, a member of our Board of Directors.
 
(6)
Includes 501,127 shares of common stock and options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Michael G. Acton, our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary-Treasurer.
 
(7)
Includes 342,149 shares of common stock and 86,667 warrants owned by Mr. Darrell Meador and his related party.  Mr. Meador is the President of 4G.
 
(8)
Includes 367,063 shares of common stock, owned by Mr. Michael Jones, our Chief Strategy Officer.
 
(9)
Includes 213,125 shares of common stock, owned by David Lee, our Chief Operating Officer.
 
(10)
Includes 189,460 shares of common stock and options to purchase 15,770 shares of common stock owned by Mr. James G. Carter, a member of our Board of Directors.
 
(11)
Includes 154,663 shares of common stock and options to purchase 25,100 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Robert J. Welgos, a member of our Board of Directors.
 
(12)
Includes 129,099 shares of common stock and options to purchase 21,500 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Jack Johnson, a member of our Board of Directors.
 
 (13)
Duplicate entries eliminated.
 
 
33

 
 
Item 13.              Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
Related-Party Transactions
 
Related-Party Notes Payable
 
As of September 30, 2013, we owed $1,896,135 of related-party notes to four of our officers, or entities controlled by officers, and one of our board members, with annual interest rates ranging from 12% to 18%.  Two entities controlled by Jeffery Peterson, Vice President of Finance, were owed $1,637,770 on related-party notes and all notes were repaid or converted to common stock subsequent to year end.  An entity under control of David Derrick, Chief Executive Officer, was owed $175,000 on a related-party note and $160,000 was converted to common stock subsequent to year end.  Michael Acton, Chief Financial Officer, was owed $43,000 on a related-party note.  Bill Martin, Board of Director, was owed $26,721 on a related-party note.  Michael Jones, Chief Strategy Officer, was owed $13, 644 on a related-party note.  During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, we also issued 341,000 warrants exercisable at a price of $0.10 per share and 80,000 shares of Series D preferred stock with total value of $347,130 at the date of grant related to notes payable.
 
As of September 30, 2012, we owed $1,957,161 of related-party notes to three of our officers, or entities controlled by officers, and one former officer, with annual interest rates ranging from 12% to 18%.  Three entities controlled by Jeffery Peterson, Vice President of Finance, were owed $1,059,278 on related-party notes.  An entity under control of David Derrick, Chief Executive Officer, was owed $620,687 on a related-party note. James Dalton, former Chief Executive Officer, was owed $244,196 on a related-party note.  Michael Acton, Chief Financial Officer, was owed $33,000 on a related-party note.
 
Loan conversion and Preferred stock conversion
 
Subsequent to the year ended September 30, 2013, we entered into loan conversion agreements with related parties.  We issued 3,197,119 shares of common stock for the conversion of notes payable representing principal and interest in the amount of $1,945,500.  We also issued 650,000 warrants exercisable at a price of $1.10 per share for five year.
 
Subsequent to the year ended September 30, 2013, we entered into Series D preferred stock conversion agreements with related parties.  We issued 4,391,667 shares of common stock for the conversion of 627,381 shares of Series D preferred stock.
 
Indemnification Agreements
 
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our current directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. We also intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our future directors and executive officers.
 
Procedures for Related-Party Transactions
 
Under our code of business conduct and ethics adopted in June 2009, our employees, officers and directors are discouraged from entering into any transaction that may cause a conflict of interest for us.  In addition, they must report any potential conflict of interest, including related-party transactions, to their managers or our corporate counsel who then reviews and summarizes the proposed transaction for our audit committee.  Pursuant to its charter, our audit committee is required to then approve any related-party transactions, including those transactions involving our directors. In approving or rejecting such proposed transactions, the audit committee will be required to consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the audit committee, including the material terms of the transactions, risks, benefits, costs, availability of other comparable services or products and, if applicable, the impact on a director’s independence.  Our audit committee will approve only those transactions that, in light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as our audit committee determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion.  A copy of our code of business conduct and ethics and audit committee charter are available on our corporate website at www.activecare.com.
 
Corporate Governance and Director Independence
 
Board Composition
 
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors.  Our Board of Directors is comprised of five directors, four of whom (Mr. Carter, Mr. Martin, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Welgos) are independent within the meaning of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.  This means that the Board of Directors has determined that those directors (1) are not officers or employees of ActiveCare or its subsidiary and (2) have no direct or indirect relationship with ActiveCare that would interfere with the exercise of their independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.  We have determined that it is in our best interest to have directors who would meet the requirements of being “independent” under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
 
 
34

 
 
Board Committees
 
Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee and a compensation committee.  The composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below.  Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board of Directors.  
 
Audit Committee
 
Our audit committee is comprised of two of our independent directors: Mr. Welgos and Mr. Martin.  Mr. Welgos serves as chair of the audit committee and is considered to be the financial expert on that committee.  Our audit committee has responsibility for, among other things:
 
·
selecting and hiring our independent registered public accounting firm, and approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by and the fees to be paid to our independent registered public accounting firm;
   
·
evaluating the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm;
   
·
monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to financial statements or accounting matters;
   
·
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control policies and procedures;
   
·
discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm and reviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our interim and year-end operating results; and
   
·
preparing the audit committee report required by the SEC, to be included in our annual proxy statement.
 
As indicated above, our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Mr. Welgos and Mr. Martin meet the definition of “independent directors” for purposes of serving on an audit committee under applicable SEC rules, and we intend to comply with these independence requirements within the time periods specified.  In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Welgos meets the standards established by the SEC to qualify as a “financial expert” under Item 407 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act.  Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for our audit committee, which is available on our corporate website at www.activecaresys.com.
 
Compensation Committee
 
Our compensation committee consists of two independent directors, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Carter.  Mr. Johnson is the chairman of our compensation committee.  The compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:  
 
·
reviewing and approving compensation of our executive officers including annual base salary, annual incentive bonuses, specific goals, equity compensation, employment agreements, severance and change in control arrangements, and any other benefits, compensations or arrangements;
   
·
reviewing succession planning for our executive officers;
   
·
reviewing and recommending compensation goals, bonus and stock compensation criteria for our employees;
   
·
preparing the compensation committee report required by the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement; and
   
·
administering, reviewing and making recommendations with respect to our equity compensation plans.
 
Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for our compensation committee, which is available on our corporate website at www.activecaresys.com.
 
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
 
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers and all persons performing similar functions.  A copy of that code is available on our corporate website at www.activecaresys.com.  We expect that any amendments to such code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our website.
 
 
35

 
 
Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees
 
The Board of Directors is elected by and is accountable to our stockholders.  The Board establishes policy and provides our strategic direction, oversight, and control.  The Board met seven times during fiscal year 2013.  All directors attended 100% of the meetings of the Board and the Board committees of which they are members.
 
Item 14.              Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
Audit Related Fees, Tax Fees, Audit Related Fees, and All Other Fees
 
            Audit services consist of the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, and other services related to filings and registration statements filed by us and other pertinent matters.
 
During the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, Tanner LLC (“Tanner”) performed audit and audit related services including the audit of the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for 2013, reviews of the quarterly financial information and Forms 10-Q  and audit related services for the audits of 4G and Green Wire (in connection with their acquisitions) and certain filings by the Company on Form 8-K.  Tanner did not perform any financial information systems design and implementation services for the Company.
 
Tanner incurred fees of $176,300 and $99,000 for audit services and $0 and $141,000 for audit-related services with respect to the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
 
Auditor Independence
 
Our audit committee considered that the work done for us in fiscal year 2013 by Tanner was compatible with maintaining that firm’s independence.
 
Tanner has advised us that it has no direct or indirect financial interest in the Company or in any of its subsidiaries and that it has had, during the last three years, no connection with the Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than as independent auditors or in connection with certain other activities, as described above.
 
Report of the Audit Committee
 
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors.  Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The directors who serve on the Audit Committee are all independent for purposes of applicable SEC Rules.  The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board of Directors.
 
We have reviewed and discussed with management and Tanner the audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2013.  The Audit Committee has discussed with Tanner the matters that are required to be discussed under PCAOB standards.  Tanner has provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the committee has discussed with Tanner that firm’s independence.  The Audit Committee has concluded that Tanner is independent from the Company and its management.
 
Based on our review and discussions referred to above, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2013, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee:
 
   
Robert J. Welgos, Chair
William K. Martin
 
 
36

 
 
PART IV
 
Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
 
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form:
   
1.
Financial Statements—all consolidated financial statements of the Company as set forth under Item 8, of this Form 10-K.
   
2.
Financial Statement Schedules.    [N/A, because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto, or is not applicable.]
   
3.
Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the Commission: 
 
Exhibit No.
 
Title of Document
(3)(i)
 
Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series F Variable Rate Convertible Preferred Stock *
       
(10)(i)
 
Asset Purchase Agreement with GreenWire, LLC and Related Entities
       
(10)(ii)
 
Promissory Notes with GreenWire, LLC and Related Entities
       
(10)(iii)
 
Security Agreement with GreenWire, LLC and Related Entities
       
(10)(iv)
 
Guaranty Agreement with GreenWire, LLC and Related Entities
       
(10)(v)
 
Employment Agreement with Andrew Ball, Former Key Manager of GreenWire, LLC
       
(10)(vi)
 
Employment Agreement with David Lee, Former Key Manager of GreenWire, LLC
       
(10)(vii)
 
Voting Agreement and Proxy with Adrew Ball and David Lee
       
(10)(viii)
 
 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 16, 2013 *
       
(10)(ix)
 
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock *
       
(10)(x)
 
Form of Exchange Agreement *
       
(10)(xi)
 
Form of Loan Conversion Agreement *
       
(10)(xii)
 
Form of Preferred Stock Series C  and Series D Conversino Notice *
       
(10)(xiii)
 
Form of Stock Purchase Warrant *
       
(10)(xiv)
 
Employment Agreement with David Derrick, Chief Executive Officer. *
       
(10)(xv)
 
Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement with David Derrick, Chief Executive Officer.* 
       
(10)(xvi)
 
Office Lease Agreement between the Company and Countryview  Properties, LLC.*
       
(31)(i)
 
Certifications of Chief Executive (Principal) Executive Officer under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
       
(31)(ii)
 
Certifications of Chief Financial (Principal Financial and Accounting) Officer under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
       
(32)(i)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350
       
(32)(ii)
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350
 
101 INS
 
XBRL Instance Document**
     
101 SCH
 
XBRL Schema Document**
     
101 CAL
 
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document**
     
101 DEF
 
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document**
     
101 LAB
 
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document**
     
101 PRE
 
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document**
     
 *    Previously filed.
     
**
 
The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

 
37

 
 
SIGNATURES
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
ActiveCare, Inc.
   
 
By:   /s/ David G. Derrick
 
       David G. Derrick, Chief Executive Officer
 
       (Principal Executive Officer)
 
Date:  January 13, 2014
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
Signature
 
Title
Date
       
       
       
 /s/ David G. Derrick
 
Director, Chairman, and
January 13, 2014
David G. Derrick
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
   
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
       
       
 /s/ James G. Carter
     
James G. Carter
 
 Director
January 13, 2014
       
       
       
 /s/ Robert J. Welgos
   
January 13, 2014
Robert J. Welgos
 
 Director
 
       
       
       
  /s/ William K. Martin
   
January 13, 2014
William K. Martin
 
 Director
 
       
       
       
 /s/ Jack J. Johnson
     
Jack J. Johnson
 
 Director
January 13, 2014
       
       
       
 /s/ Michael G. Acton
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
Michael G. Acton
 
(principal financial officer)
 January 13, 2014
   
(principal accounting officer)
 
 
 
38

 
 

ACTIVECARE, INC. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Statements
As of September 30, 2013 and 2012 and for the Years then Ended
 
 
 

 
 
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 
Page
    
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-3
   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-5
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-6
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
F-8
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-10
 
 
F - 1

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of ActiveCare, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ActiveCare, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ActiveCare, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses, has negative cash flows from operating activities, has negative working capital, and has negative total equity.  These conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans regarding these matters are also discussed in Note 1.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


/s/ Tanner LLC

Salt Lake City, Utah
January 13, 2014

 
F - 2

 
 
ActiveCare, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
As of September 30, 2013 and 2012
 
             
             
   
2013
   
2012
 
Assets
           
             
Current assets:
           
Cash
  $ 223,835     $ 529,839  
Accounts receivable, net
    7,345,912       644,974  
Inventory
    1,249,220       290,768  
Prepaid expenses and other
    38,998       7,277  
                 
Total current assets
    8,857,965       1,472,858  
                 
Customer contracts, net of accumulated amortization of $935,361 and $102,330, respectively
    1,434,521       2,267,552  
Goodwill
    825,894       825,894  
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $355,458 and $228,587, respectively
    566,920       693,790  
Equipment leased to customers, net
    273,630       312,993  
Property and equipment, net
    296,730       266,078  
Deposits and other assets
    106,950       24,634  
Domain name, net of accumulated amortization of $2,860 and $2,145,respectively
    11,440       12,155  
                 
Total assets
  $ 12,374,050     $ 5,875,954  
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
 
F - 3

 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
As of September 30, 2013 and 2012
 
(Continued)
 
             
             
   
2013
   
2012
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
           
             
Current liabilities:
           
Accounts payable
  $ 6,621,234     $ 1,132,611  
Accounts payable, related-party
    251,386       150,395  
Accrued expenses
    1,253,616       2,104,623  
Derivatives liability
    795,151       4,015,855  
Current portion of notes payable
    1,278,585       2,569,221  
Current portion of notes payable, related-party
    1,892,415       1,563,923  
Deferred revenue
    13,585       61,608  
Dividends payable
    3,471       18,322  
                 
Total current liabilities
    12,109,443       11,616,558  
                 
Notes payable, net of current portion
    1,055,918       1,804,929  
Notes payable, related-party, net of current portion
    -       169,857  
                 
Total long-term liabilities
    1,055,918       1,974,786  
                 
Total liabilities
    13,165,361       13,591,344  
                 
Stockholders’ deficit:
               
Preferred stock, $.00001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 480,000 and 480,000 shares of Series C; 938,218 and 386,103 shares of Series D; and 61,723 and 0 shares of Series E, outstanding, respectively
    15       9  
Common stock, $.00001 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 21,775,303 and 4,636,977 shares outstanding,  respectively
    220       46  
Additional paid-in capital, common and preferred)
    62,519,542       29,643,769  
Accumulated deficit
    (63,311,088 )     (37,359,214 )
                 
Total stockholders’ deficit
    (791,311 )     (7,715,390 )
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
  $ 12,374,050     $ 5,875,954  
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
F - 4

 

ActiveCare, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
For the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
 
             
             
   
2013
   
2012
 
             
Revenues:
           
Chronic illness monitoring
  $ 9,738,988     $ 706,888  
CareServices
    1,660,544       352,223  
Total revenues
    11,399,532       1,059,111  
                 
Cost of revenues:
               
Chronic illness monitoring
    7,309,999       536,790  
CareServices
    2,325,226       736,520  
Total cost of revenues
    9,635,225       1,273,310  
                 
Gross profit (deficit)
    1,764,307       (214,199 )
                 
Operating expenses:
               
Selling, general and administrative (including $2,159,828 and $3,927,214, respectively, of stock-based compensation)
    11,039,645       8,855,724  
Research and development
    832,271       187,230  
Total operating expenses
    11,871,916       9,042,954  
                 
Loss from operations
    (10,107,609 )     (9,257,153 )
                 
Other income (expense):
               
Loss on derivatives liability
    (333,406 )     (2,104,389 )
Loss on induced conversion of debt and sale of common stock
    (9,355,587 )     -  
Interest expense, net
    (5,583,932 )     (858,224 )
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    (200,149 )     -  
Other expense
    (45,011 )     -  
Total other income (expense)
    (15,518,085 )     (2,962,613 )
                 
Net loss from continuing operations
    (25,625,694 )     (12,219,766 )
                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (5,312 )     (145,990 )
                 
Net loss
    (25,631,006 )     (12,365,756 )
                 
Dividends on preferred stock
    (320,868 )     (57,183 )
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $ (25,951,874 )   $ (12,422,939 )
                 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
               
Continuing operations
  $ (3.52 )   $ (2.89 )
Discontinued operations
    (0.00 )     (0.03 )
                 
Net loss per common share
  $ (3.52 )   $ (2.92 )
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted
    7,369,000       4,251,500  

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
F - 5

 

ActiveCare, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
 
For the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
 
                                                                   
                                                                   
   
Preferred Stock
                               
   
Series C
   
Series D
   
Series E
   
Common Stock
   
Additional
   
Accumulated
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Paid-in Capital
   
Deficit
   
Total
 
                                                                   
Balance, September 30, 2011
    -     $ -       -     $ -       -     $ -       3,856,816     $ 39     $ 24,394,848     $ (24,936,275 )   $ (541,388 )
                                                                                         
Issuance of common stock for:
                                                                                       
  Services
    -       -       -       -       -       -       129,161       1       218,905       -       218,906  
  Accrued expenses
                                                    60,000       1       311,999       -       312,000  
  Loan origination fees
    -       -       -       -       -       -       100,000       1       69,999       -       70,000  
  Debt conversion
    -       -       -       -       -       -       231,000       1       92,399       -       92,400  
  Settlement agreement
    -       -       -       -       -       -       200,000       2       499,998       -       500,000  
Issuance of Series D preferred stock for:
                                                                                       
  Debt conversion
    -       -       55,000       1       -       -       -       -       109,999       -       110,000  
  Loan origination fees
    -       -       140,000       1       -       -       -       -       389,999       -       390,000  
  Acquisitions
    -       -       180,000       2       -       -       -       -       679,998       -       680,000  
  Dividends
    -       -       11,103       -       -       -       -       -       38,861       -       38,861  
Stock-based compensation
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       3,708,308       -       3,708,308  
Issuance of options for loan origination fees
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       117,551       -       117,551  
Derivatives liability
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (1,911,466 )     -       (1,911,466 )
Issuance of common and Series C preferred stock for patents
    480,000       5       -       -       -       -       60,000       1       922,371       -       922,377  
Net loss
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (12,365,756 )     (12,365,756 )
Dividends on preferred stock
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (57,183 )     (57,183 )
                                                                                         
Balance, September 30, 2012
    480,000     $ 5       386,103     $ 4       -     $ -       4,636,977     $ 46     $ 29,643,769     $ (37,359,214 )   $ (7,715,390 )
 
 
F - 6

 

ActiveCare, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit (continued)
For the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

   
Preferred Stock
                               
   
Series C
   
Series D
   
Series E
   
Common Stock
   
Additional
   
Accumulated
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Paid-in Capital
   
Deficit
   
Total
 
                                                                   
Balance, September 30, 2012
    480,000     $ 5       386,103     $ 4       -     $ -       4,636,977     $ 46     $ 29,643,769     $ (37,359,214 )   $ (7,715,390 )
                                                                                         
Issuance of common stock for:
                                                                                       
  Services
    -       -       -       -       -       -       1,579,632       16       475,484       -       475,500  
  Accrued expenses
    -       -       -       -       -       -       166,200       2       225,298       -       225,300  
  Loan origination fees
    -       -       -       -       -       -       189,345       2       334,265       -       334,267  
  Debt conversion
    -       -       -       -       -       -       13,439,190       136       18,466,987       -       18,467,123  
  Cash
    -       -       -       -       -       -       1,313,334       13       1,838,820       -       1,838,833  
  Dividends
    -       -       -       -       -       -       200,625       2       251,562       -       251,564  
  Conversion of Series D preferred stock
    -       -       (50,000 )     (1 )     -       -       250,000       3       (2 )     -       -  
Issuance of Series D preferred stock for:
                                                                                       
  Services
    -       -       484,185       5       -       -       -       -       1,800,526       -       1,800,531  
  Loan origination fees
    -       -       103,843       1       -       -       -       -       817,482       -       817,483  
  Dividends
    -       -       14,087       -       -       -       -       -       66,881       -       66,881  
Issuance of Series E preferred stock for debt conversions
    -       -       -       -       61,723       1       -       -       614,764       -       614,765  
Stock-based compensation
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       1,750,274       -       1,750,274  
Issuance of options for:
                                                                                       
  Loan origination fees
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       289,732       -       289,732  
  Services
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       202,572       -       202,572  
Derivatives liability
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       4,417,456       -       4,417,456  
Beneficial conversion features on debt
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       1,323,672       -       1,323,672  
Net loss
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (25,631,006 )     (25,631,006 )
Dividends on preferred stock
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (320,868 )     (320,868 )
                                                                                         
Balance, September 30, 2013
    480,000     $ 5       938,218     $ 9       61,723     $ 1       21,775,303     $ 220     $ 62,519,542     $ (63,311,088 )   $ (791,311 )

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
F - 7

 

ActiveCare, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

   
2013
   
2012
 
             
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net loss
  $ (25,631,006 )   $ (12,365,756 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    1,232,734       385,485  
Derivatives loss
    333,406       2,104,389  
Stock-based compensation expense
    2,159,828       3,927,214  
Stock and warrants issued for services
    1,286,999       -  
Stock and warrants issued for interest expense
    601,220       -  
Amortization of debt discounts
    3,097,009       418,084  
Loss on induced conversion of debt and sale of common stock
    9,355,587       -  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    200,149       -  
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
    (55,096 )     -  
Settlement agreement
    -       500,000  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (6,783,896 )     (527,954 )
Inventory
    (1,011,952 )     (174,758 )
Prepaid expenses and other
    (16,822 )     18,101  
Accounts payable
    5,787,603       676,766  
Accrued expenses
    629,879       2,063,859  
Deferred revenue
    (48,023 )     26,101  
Deposits and other assets
    (82,316 )     -  
Net cash used in operating activities
    (8,944,697 )     (2,948,469 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of property and equipment
    (249,771 )     (47,826 )
Purchases of equipment leased to customers
    (235,917 )     -  
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
    184,318       -  
Proceeds from sale of equipment
    4,900       -  
Net cash acquired from Green Wire
    -       12,215  
Acquisition of 4G Biometrics, LLC
    -       (350,000 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    (296,470 )     (385,611 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Principal payments on related-party notes payable
    (198,606 )     (165,325 )
Proceeds from related-party notes payable, net
    5,720,799       2,190,000  
Proceeds from  notes payable, net
    3,790,496       1,746,113  
Principal payments on notes payable
    (1,341,755 )     (85,000 )
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net
    981,500       -  
Payment of dividends
    (17,271 )     -  
Net cash provided by financing activities
    8,935,163       3,685,788  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash
    (306,004 )     351,708  
Cash, beginning of the period
    529,839       178,131  
                 
Cash, end of the period
  $ 223,835     $ 529,839  

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 
F - 8

 

ActiveCare, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
For the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

   
2013
   
2012
 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
           
Cash paid for interest
  $ 745,423     $ 530,891  
                 
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
               
Reclassification of derivatives liability to equity
  $ 4,484,801     $ -  
Issuance of stock for loan origination fees
    2,252,376       460,000  
Conversion of notes payable to debentures
    1,920,797       -  
Issuance of derivatives
    1,410,147       1,911,466  
Issuance of common and prefered stock for settlement of liabilities
    991,750       312,000  
Dividends on preferred stock
    320,868       57,183  
Issuance of stock for dividends
    318,445       38,861  
Issuance of stock for prepaid expenses
    14,899       -  
Issuance of common and Series C preferred stock for patents
    -       922,377  
Issuance of stock for debt conversion
    -       202,400  
Accrued interest transferred to notes payable
    -       174,273  
Issuance of options for loan origination fees
    -       117,551  

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
 
 
F - 9

 
 
ActiveCare, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013 and 2012


1.             Organization and Nature of Operations

ActiveCare, Inc. ( “ActiveCare”) was formed March 5, 1998 as a wholly owned subsidiary of SecureAlert, Inc. [OTCBB: SCRA.OB], a Utah corporation, formerly known as RemoteMDx, Inc. (“SecureAlert”).  ActiveCare was spun off from SecureAlert in February 2009 and SecureAlert retained no ownership interest in ActiveCare.  In July 2009, ActiveCare was reincorporated in Delaware.  ActiveCare and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively “the Company”) is a technology and service provider that provides real-time visibility to health conditions and risk, and has a unique active approach in caring for members, resulting in improved outcomes.
 
Going Concern
 
Although the Company had positive gross margin for fiscal year 2013, it has incurred negative cash flows from operating activities, recurring net losses, negative working capital, and negative total equity. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
\
In order for the Company to remove substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern, it must improve gross margins, generate positive cash flows from operating activities, and obtain the necessary debt or equity funding to meet its projected capital investment requirements. Management’s plans with respect to this uncertainty include raising additional capital by issuing equity securities and increasing the sales of the Company’s services and products. Subsequent to year end, the Company (1) completed the sale of $3,120,000 of 8% Series F variable rate convertible preferred stock (“Series F preferred stock”); (2) converted $2,301,801 of debt and accrued interest to common stock; and (3) converted $573,886 of debt and accrued interest to Series F variable rate convertible preferred stock (see Note 20). There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise sufficient additional capital or that revenues will increase rapidly enough to offset operating losses. If the Company is unable to increase revenues or obtain additional financing, it will be unable to continue the development of its products and may have to cease operations.
2.             Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Accounting and Consolidation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”).  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ActiveCare and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

In May 2013, the Company effected a 10-for-1 reverse common stock split.  The consolidated financial statements and notes for all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse common stock split.

Discontinued Operations
In June 2013, the Company sold the net assets and operations of its reagents business segment to a third party for $184,318 in cash.  During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized a loss from discontinued operations of $5,312 and $145,990, respectively.

 
F - 10

 
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature and liquidity of these financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value based on current market pricing models. Based on current market condition, the Company estimates the fair values of its long-term debt obligations approximate their carrying values as of September 30, 2013.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company has cash in bank accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.  The Company has not experienced any losses in these accounts.

In the normal course of business, the Company provides credit terms to its customers and requires no collateral.  The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.  The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon management’s specific review and assessment of each account at the period end.

During fiscal year 2013, the Company had revenues from three significant Chronic Illness Monitoring customers, which represented 72% of total revenue.  As of September 30, 2013, accounts receivable from significant customers represented 92% of total accounts receivable.  During fiscal year 2012, the Company had revenues from one significant Chronic Illness Monitoring customer, which represented 28% of total revenues.  As of September 30, 2012, accounts receivable from the significant customer represented 51% of total accounts receivable.

Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts. Specific reserves are estimated by management based on certain assumptions and variables, including the customer’s financial condition, age of the customer’s receivables and changes in payment histories. Accounts receivable are written off when management determines the likelihood of collection is remote. A receivable is considered to be past due if any portion of the receivable balance has not been received by the contractual payment date. Interest is not charged on accounts receivable that are past due. The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $76,544 and $20,195 as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
 
 
F - 11

 
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Chronic Illness Monitoring inventory consists of diabetic supplies. The Company writes down inventory for obsolescence and excessive levels to estimated net realizable value. Due to competitive pressures and technological innovation, it is possible that estimates of net realizable values could change in the near term. Inventories consist of the following as of September 30:

   
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 351,645     $ 467,259  
Cost of revenues
    (300,396 )     (392,049 )
Gross profit
    51,249       75,210  
                 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (111,657 )     (221,200 )
                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (60,408 )     (145,990 )
                 
Gain on sale discontinued operations
    55,096       -  
                 
Net loss from discontinued operations
  $ (5,312 )   $ (145,990 )

Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization are determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range between 3 and 7 years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms of the lease.  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.  Upon the sale or disposal of property and equipment, any gains or losses are included in the results of operations.

Equipment Leased to Customers
Leased equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  The Company amortizes the cost of leased equipment on a straight-line basis over 36 months, which is the estimated useful life of the equipment.  Amortization of leased equipment is recorded as cost of revenues.

Goodwill
Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for potential impairment at least annually.  The identification and measurement of goodwill impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of the Company’s reporting units.  The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment and incorporate management assumptions about expected future cash flows.  Future cash flows can be affected by changes in Company performance, industry or market conditions, or overall economic trends.  Management determined goodwill that was not impaired during fiscal years 2013 or 2012.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Purchased intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets, which range from 2 to 20 years.  Long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable.  Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition.  Management determined that long-lived assets were not impaired during fiscal years 2013 or 2012.

Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue has historically been from three sources: (i) sales from Chronic Illness Monitoring services and supplies; (ii) sales from CareServices; and (iii) sales of medical diagnostic stains from the reagents segment, which was sold during fiscal year 2013 and reported as discontinued operations.

 
F - 12

 
 
Chronic Illness Monitoring
The Company began chronic illness monitoring sales as a result of its acquisition of 4G Biometrics, LLC in the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (see Note 4).  The Company recognizes Chronic Illness Monitoring revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer exists, title passes to the customer, prices are fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.
 
Shipping and handling billed to customers are included in revenues.  The related freight costs and supplies directly associated with shipping products to customers are included as a component of cost of revenues.  Sales of Chronic Illness Monitoring products and services do not contain multiple deliverables.
 
The Company enters into agreements with insurance companies, disease management companies, and self-insured companies (collectively, customers) to lower medical expenses by distributing diabetic testing supplies to their customers or employees (members) and monitoring their test results.  Customers are obligated to pay for the supplies at the time of shipment and cash is due from these customers as the product is deployed to the members.  The terms of these contracts are generally one year and, unless terminated by either party, will automatically renew for another year.  Collection terms are net 30-days after claims are submitted.
 
Revenue is recognized on the date of sale because the following exist:
 
·
The price to the contracted customer is fixed or determinable at the date of sale.
   
·
The customer has paid or is obligated to pay the Company within terms.
   
·
The customer’s obligation to the Company is not changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product.
   
·
Once the product is shipped, there is no right of return.
 
CareServices
 
The “CareServices” segment sells devices to distributors as well as provides monitoring services to end users on a contractual basis.  The Company typically enters into contracts on a month-to-month basis with customers (members) that use the Company’s CareServices.  However, either party may cancel these contracts at any time with 30-days notice.  Under the Company’s standard contract, the device becomes billable on the date the member orders the product, and remains billable until the device is returned to the Company.  The Company recognizes revenue on devices at the end of each month that CareServices have been provided.  In those circumstances in which the Company receives payment in advance, the Company records these payments as deferred revenue.
 
The Company recognizes CareServices revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer exists, title passes to the customer, prices are fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.  Shipping and handling fees billed to the customer are included in revenues.  The related freight costs and supplies directly associated with shipping products to members are included as a component of cost of revenues.  All CareServices sales are made with net 30-day payment terms.
 
Revenue is recognized on the date of sale because the following exist:
 
·
The price to the customer is fixed or determinable at the date of sale.
   
·
The customer has paid or is obligated to pay within terms, and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product.
   
·
The customer’s obligation is not changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product.
   
·
The customer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from the Company.
   
·
The Company does not have significant obligations for future performance to bring about resale of the product by the customer.
   
·
The amount of future returns are estimatable and are not significant.
 
The vast majority of CareServices revenues are for services.  Because equipment sales are not material, the Company presents services and equipment sales together in the accompanying financial statements.
 
 
F - 13

 
 
The Company’s distributors are not required to maintain specified amounts of product on hand, and distributors are not required to make minimum purchases to maintain distributor status.  Distributors have no stock rotation rights or additional rights of return.  Revenues from products sold with long-term service contracts are recognized ratably over the expected life of the contract.  Revenues are recorded net of estimated returns and discounts.
 
Reagents
Prior to the sale of the reagent segment, the Company recognized reagents revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement with the customer existed, title passed to the customer, prices were fixed or determinable, and collection was reasonably assured.  Prior to the sale of the reagent segment, shipping and handling fees billed to customers were included in revenues and the related freight costs and supplies directly associated with shipping products to customers were included as a component of cost of revenues.
 
Research and Development Costs
All expenditures for research and development are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development expenses for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 were $832,271 and $187,230, respectively. The expenditures for fiscal year 2013 were primarily for the development of the Chronic Illness Monitoring operating system. The expenditures for fiscal year 2012 were for software development efforts for the chronic illness market.
 
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.  Advertising expenses for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 were $59,330 and $176,300, respectively.  Advertising expenses primarily relate to the Company’s Chronic Illness Monitoring segment.
 
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred income tax assets or liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or income tax returns. Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial reporting bases and tax reporting bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply when the differences are expected to be settled or realized.  Deferred income tax assets are reviewed periodically for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided as necessary.  As of September 30, 2013, management has determined to provide a 100% allowance against deferred income tax assets as it is more likely than not these assets will not be realized.  Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities, when incurred, are classified in interest expense and income tax provision, respectively.
 
Warrant Exercises
The Company issues common shares in connection with warrant exercises when it has received verification that the proceeds have been deposited and when it has received an exercise letter from the warrant holder.  The Company issues common shares in connection with note conversion after it verifies the outstanding note balance and the eligibility of conversion, and has received a conversion letter from the lender.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award.  That cost is recognized in the statement of operations over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award – the requisite service period.  The grant-date fair values of the equity instruments are estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments.
 
Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic net loss per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
 
Diluted net loss per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted-average dilutive common share equivalents then outstanding.  The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume exercise or conversion of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect.
 
 
F - 14

 
 
Common share equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of common stock warrants, shares issuable from restricted stock grants, shares issuable from convertible notes and convertible Series C, Series D and Series E preferred stock.  As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, there were 13,127,396 and 8,202,219 outstanding common share equivalents, respectively, that were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS as their effect would be anti-dilutive.  The common stock equivalents outstanding consist of the following as of September 30:

   
2013
   
2012
 
Common stock options and warrants
    3,598,554       2,386,587  
Series C convertible preferred stock
    480,000       480,000  
Series D convertible preferred stock
    4,691,090       1,830,515  
Series E convertible preferred stock
    601,585       -  
Convertible debt
    3,738,917       3,444,217  
Restricted shares of common stock
    17,250       60,900  
                 
Total common stock equivalents
    13,127,396       8,202,219  
 
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.  The reclassification had no effect on the previously reported net loss.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and has concluded that the future adoption of any such pronouncements will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

3.             Discontinued Operations
 
In June 2013, the Company sold its assets and liabilities related to the reagents segment.  This segment was engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing medical diagnostic stains, solutions and related equipment to hospitals and medical testing labs.  The purchaser was a former employee.  The sale consisted solely the Company's reagents business.
 
The Company no longer holds any ownership interest in the reagents segment and has ceased incurring costs related to its operations and development. The sale included all applicable segment assets and liabilities including, accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, property, equipment and leased equipment.  The purchaser also assumed the lease for general office and warehouse space.
 
As a result of the sale of the reagents business, the Company has reflected this segment as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for fiscal years 2013 and 2012.  The following table summarizes certain operating data for discontinued operations for fiscal years 2013 and 2012:
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Revenues
  $ 351,645     $ 467,259  
Cost of revenues
    (300,396 )     (392,049 )
Gross profit
    51,249       75,210  
                 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (111,657 )     (221,200 )
                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (60,408 )     (145,990 )
                 
Gain on sale discontinued operations
    55,096       -  
                 
Net loss from discontinued operations
  $ (5,312 )   $ (145,990 )
 
 
F - 15

 
 
4.             Acquisitions
 
4G Biometrics, LLC
 
On March 8, 2012, the Company acquired 4G Biometrics, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“4G”).  Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, the Company acquired 100 percent of the member interests of 4G and 4G is operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  The consideration for the member interests of 4G was comprised as follows:
 
·
$350,000 in cash;
   
·
The assumption of $50,000 of accounts payable and accrued liabilities;
   
·
160,000 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock;
   
·
Options for the purchase of up to 433,333 shares of common stock of the Company at $1.00 per share to each of the three sellers with vesting as follows:
   
o
Options for 43,333 shares vest when 4G has 9,300 members
   
o
Options for another 43,333 shares vest when an additional 5,000 4G members are added, or a total of 14,300 members;
   
o
Options for another 43,333 shares vest when an additional 5,000 4G members are added, or a total of 19,300 members;
   
o
Options for another 43,333 shares vest when an additional 5,000 4G members are added, or a total of 24,300 members; and
   
o
so forth until fully vested.
 
As of September 30, 2013, options to purchase 260,000 shares of common stock have vested.
 
Three of the 4G key operational managers are under two-year written employment agreements with the Company.
 
Under the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price was allocated to 4G’s assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the closing date of the acquisition.  The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.
 
The purchase price for 4G reflects total consideration paid of $1,040,000, of which $825,894 was allocated to goodwill and $214,106 was allocated to customer contracts.
 
GWire
 
During fiscal year 2012, the Company established GWire Corporation (“GWire”) as a subsidiary.  Effective September 1, 2012, GWire acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Green Wire, LLC, Green Wire Outsourcing, Inc., Orbit Medical Response, LLC, and Rapid Medical Response, LLC (collectively, “Green Wire”).  The Company entered into employment agreements with two of Green Wire’s operating managers on November 1, 2012. These two individuals were granted 27% ownership in GWire and ActiveCare retained the remaining 73%.  The purchase consideration for Green Wire consisted of the following:
 
·
$2,236,737 in the form of a note payable with a 36-month initial term (including imputed interest at 12%); and
   
·
20,000 shares of ActiveCare’s Series D convertible preferred stock, valued at $40,000.
 
Under the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price for Green Wire was allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the closing date of the acquisition.
 
The purchase price for Green Wire reflects total consideration paid of $2,276,737, which has been allocated to $12,215 of cash, $13,976 of accounts receivable, $92,022 of property and equipment, $16,964 of deposits and other assets, $229,249 of leased equipment, $2,155,776 of customer contracts, $154,206 of accounts payable, $55,117 of accrued expenses and $34,142 of deferred revenue.
 
 
F - 16

 
 
During fiscal year 2013, the two operating managers converted their 27% ownership in GWire and 425,000 of related options into 425,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  As a result, the Company owns 100% of GWire as of September 30, 2013.
 
5.             Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of September 30:
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Equipment
  $ 255,339     $ 374,229  
Leasehold improvements
    145,147       402,016  
Software
    87,361       65,111  
Furniture
    32,855       50,123  
Total gross property and equipment
    520,702       891,479  
                 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (223,972 )     (625,401 )
                 
Property and equipment, net
  $ 296,730     $ 266,078  
 
Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amounts or fair values, less the estimated costs to sell or dispose.  During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a loss on the disposal of assets of $200,149 and $0, respectively, and disposed of $25,832 of assets related to the sale of the Reagents segment during fiscal year 2013. Depreciation expense for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was $97,068 and $64,632, respectively.
 
6.             Patent License Agreement
 
During fiscal year 2009, the Company licensed the use of certain patents from a third party.  Under the license agreement, the Company was required to pay $300,000 plus a 5% royalty on the net sales of all licensed products. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had capitalized the initial license fee as a long-term asset and had recorded a corresponding current liability as the fee was not yet paid.
 
During fiscal year 2012, the Company agreed to purchase the related patents and settle amounts owed under the license agreement by issuing 600,000 shares of common stock and 480,000 shares of Series C preferred stock.  The patents were valued at $922,378, based on a valuation performed by an independent valuation expert.  The value of the common stock issued was $240,000, based on the market price of the common stock on the date of issuance. The implied value of the Series C was $682,378, which was based on the difference between the value of the patents and the common stock issued in settlement of the existing liability.
 
The Company is amortizing the patents over their remaining useful lives (through 2018).  Amortization expense for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was $126,870 and $147,277, respectively.  The Company’s future patent amortization as of September 30, 2013, is as follows:
 
Years Ending September 30,
     
2014
  $ 126,870  
2015
    126,870  
2016
    126,870  
2017
    126,870  
2018
    59,440  
         
    $ 566,920  
 
 
F - 17

 

7.             Customer Contracts
 
During the fiscal year ended 2012, the Company recorded customer contracts of $2,369,882 acquired in its purchase of 4G and GWire.  The Company is amortizing the customer contracts over their estimated useful lives (through 2015).  Amortization expense for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was $833,032 and $102,329, respectively.  The Company’s future customer contract amortization as of September 30, 2013, is as follows:
 
Years Ending September 30,
     
2014
  $ 775,812  
2015
    658,709  
         
    $ 1,434,521  
 
8.             Equipment Leased to Customers
 
Equipment leased to customers consisted of the following as of September 30:
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Leased equipment
  $ 389,492     $ 457,898  
Accumulated depreciation
    (115,862 )     (144,905 )
                 
Leased equipment, net
  $ 273,630     $ 312,993  
 
The Company leases monitoring equipment to customers for CareServices.  The leased equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over the 3-year estimated useful lives of the related equipment, regardless of whether the equipment is leased to a customer or remaining in stock.  Leased equipment depreciation expense for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was $175,049 and $70,531, respectively.  The depreciation expense is recorded in cost of revenues for CareServices. Customers have the right to cancel the service agreements at any time.  During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a loss on the disposal of leased equipment of $75,124 and $0, respectively.
 
9.             Notes Payable
 
The Company had the following notes payable outstanding as of September 30:

   
2013
   
2012
 
Note payable to the former owners of Green Wire, secured by customer contracts, imputed interest rate of 12%, with monthly installments over a 38-month term.  In March 2013, the Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock to extend two past due payments without penalty and the grant date fair value was $24,000, which will be amortized over the remaining life of the note.
  $ 1,766,971     $ 2,236,737  
                 
Notes payable with interest at 12%, secured by the Company's assets, due August 2014 and convertible into the shares of common stock at $0.75 per share.  The notes required $51,250 in due diligence and legal fees.  The Company issued warrants to purchase 36,667 shares of common stock as due diligence fees with a grant date fair value of $51,452.  The Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock with a grant date fair value of $31,250 to a related party as consideration for signing a personal guarantee.  The notes and accrued interest were converted to Series F preferred stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
    550,000       -  
                 
Unsecured note with interest at 12%, due March 2013.  The note and accrued interest was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
    250,000       250,000  
 
 
F - 18

 
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Unsecured notes with interest at 15% (18% after due date), due March and April 2013, respectively.  The Company issued 20,000 shares of Series D preferred stock as loan origination fees with a grant date fair value of  $195,000.   Principal of $50,000 was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
  $ 185,476     $ -  
                 
Series A debenture loans payable, secured by customer contracts and payable in 36 monthly installments, original due dates between September and April 2016. The loans bear interest at 12% and are convertible into common stock after 180 days.  After payment of principal and interest, the holders of the Series A and Series B debentures, as a class, are entitled to receive a pro-rata share of cumulative royalties totaling 4% of the Company’s gross profits payable for the two-year period commencing at the maturity date; provided that no royalties are payable following conversion of any Series A or Series B debenture to the holder thereof.  The Company has the right to buy out each lender's royalty by paying the respective lender $20,000 for every $25,000 loaned.  The note included a beneficial conversion feature valued at $901,000 at inception, which the Company is amortizing over the life of the loan.  The feature had an unamortized value of $47,934 as of September 30, 2013.  The majority of loans were converted during fiscal year 2013.   The remaining balance was converted to Series E preferred stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
    85,719       300,000  
                 
Unsecured note with interest at 15%, due March 2013, currently in default. Note included a $25,000 cash and 100,000 shares of common stock as loan origination fees with a grant date fair value of $70,000.   The note and accrued interest was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
    25,000       275,000  
                 
Unsecured note with interest at 15% (18% after due date), due November 2012.  The Company issued 60,000 shares of Series D stock as loan origination fees with a grant date fair value of $150,000.  The note was guaranteed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.
    -       1,500,000  
Total before discount and current portion
    2,863,166       4,561,737  
Less discount
    (528,663 )     (187,587 )
                 
Total notes payable
    2,334,503       4,374,150  
Less current portion
    (1,278,585 )     (2,569,221 )
                 
Total notes payable, net of current portion
  $ 1,055,918     $ 1,804,929  
 
Scheduled principal payments on notes payable are as follows:

Years Ending September 30,
     
2014
  $ 1,768,820  
2015
    854,522  
2016
    239,824  
         
    $ 2,863,166  
 
 
F - 19

 
 
10.           Related-Party Notes Payable
 
The Company had the following related-party notes payable outstanding as of September 30:
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Unsecured notes payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company with interest at 15% (18% in the event of default), due September 30, 2013.  The Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock as loan origination fees with a grant date fair value of $93,000.  The notes and accrued interest was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
  $ 600,000     $ -  
                 
Unsecured note payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company,  with interest at 3% (18% in the event of default), due July 2013.  In July the lender agreed to extend the maturity date to September 30, 2013 with an interest at 12% (18% in the event of default).  The Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock with grant date fair value of $38,100 as loan origination fees.  In the event of default, the note is convertible into share of common stock at $0.75 per share. The note and accrued interest was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
    300,000       -  
                 
Unsecured note payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company,  interest at 12% (18% in the event of default), due September 30, 2013.  The Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock with a grant date fair value of $37,500 as loan origination fees.  In the event of default, the note is convertible into shares of common stock at $0.75 per share.  The note and accrued interest was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
    300,000       -  
                 
Unsecured notes payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, interest at 12% (18% in the event of default), due April 2013.  In the event of default, the note is convertible into shares of common stock at $0.40 per share.  The note and accrued interest was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
    200,000       -  
                 
Unsecured note payable to a lender under the control of the Company’s CEO, interest at 12%, due upon demand. The note is convertible into shares of common stock at $0.75 per share.  The Company recognized $148,750 in connection with the beneficial conversion feature.  The Company issued 17,500 shares of common stock with a grant date fair value of $26,250 as loan origination fees.  Subsequent to September 30, 2013 $160,000 of the note was converted to common stock (see note 20).
    175,000       -  
                 
Unsecured note payable with zero interest to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company.  The note was repaid in full subsequent to September 30, 2013.
    150,000       -  
 
 
F - 20

 
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Unsecured note payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, with interest at 12%, due August 2012.   During fiscal year 2013, the lender agreed to extend the maturity date to June 30, 2013 with an interest at 18% and 5,600 shares of Series D with a grant date fair value of $56,252 paid as a loan origination fee.  The note is currently in default.  The note also included $7,500 of loan origination fees added to the principal. In the event of default, the note is convertible into shares common stock at $0.40 per share.  The note and accrued interest was converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20).
  $ 82,500     $ 543,278  
                 
Unsecured note payable to an officer of the Company with interest at 15%, due June 2012, currently in default.  The note includes $3,000 of loan origination fees added to the principal and is convertible into common stock at $0.50 per share.
    33,000       33,000  
                 
Unsecured note payable to an officer of the Company with interest at 12%, due September 30, 2013, currently in default.  The loan is convertible into the Company's common stock at a rate of $0.75 per share.  The Company recognized $22,820 in connection with the beneficial conversion feature.
    26,721       -  
                 
Unsecured note payable to an officer of the Company with interest at 12%, due upon demand.
    13,644       -  
                 
Unsecured notes payable with zero interest to an individual related to an officer of the Company.  The loan was repaid in full subsequent to September 30, 2013.
    10,000       -  
                 
Series B unsecured debenture loans from entities controlled by an officer of the Company, including $68,914 in loan origination fees added to the principal of the loans, payable in 36 monthly installments, maturing December 2015 and January 2016.  Of the debenture, $554,556 was issued to settle a related-party note payable with a total outstanding balance of $460,778 and $43,364 of related accrued interest.  Of the loan, $35,000 was issued to settle an accrued service fee.  The loans bear interest at 12% and are convertible into common stock after 180 days. After payment of principal and interest, the holders of the Series B and Series A debentures, as a class, are entitled to receive a pro-rata share of cumulative royalties totaling 4% of the Company’s gross profits payable for the two-year period commencing at the maturity date; provided that no royalties are payable following conversion of any Series A or Series B debenture to the holder thereof.  The Company has the right to buy out the royalty by paying the lender $22,000 for every $25,000 loaned.  During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 34,400 shares of Series D with a fair market value of $343,748 at date of grant as additional loan origination fees, and paid $30,102 of the loan principal.  The Company is late on certain monthly payments.  The notes include beneficial conversion features valued at $167,000 at inception, which the Company is amortizing over the life of the loan.  The feature had an unamortized value of $3,348 as of September 30, 2013.  During fiscal year  2013, $722,684 of  outstanding principal and $49,895 of accrued interest were converted into 1,030,107 common shares at a rate of $0.75 per share.  The Company recorded $535,656 of expense associated with the induced conversion of these debenture loans. The majority of loans were converted during fiscal year 2013.  The remaining note of $5,270 and accrued interest were converted to common stock subsequent to September 30, 2013 (see note 20)
    5,270       -  
 
 
F - 21

 
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Unsecured notes payable to a lender under the control of the Company’s CEO with a line of credit borrowing capacity of $2,000,000, interest at 12%, due July 2013. The notes were convertible into shares of common stock at $5.00 per share.  In connection with the notes payable, the Company issued 80,000 shares of Series D preferred stock (valued at $240,000).  The Company granted warrants to purchase 341,000 shares of common stock as a loan origination fee. These warrants vested immediately and are exercisable at $4.40 per share through November 3, 2016. The fair value of the warrants was $107,130, and was measured using a binomial valuation model with the following assumptions: exercise price $4.40; risk-free interest rate of .39%; expected life of 2.5 years; expected dividends of zero; a volatility factor of 134.57%; and market price on date of grant of $4.40.  During fiscal year 2012, the Company re-priced the exercise price of the warrants from $4.40 to $1.00 per share.  During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued a Series A debenture payable to the lender in satisfaction of the outstanding balance of $620,687 plus $21,585 of accrued interest.  Upon the conversion of the note, the Company immediately recognized the unamortized debt discount of $209,143.
  $ -     $ 620,687  
                 
Note payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, interest at 12%, due December 2012.  This note was secured by real estate.  During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued a Series A debenture payable to the entity in satisfaction of the outstanding balance of $300,000 plus $14,992 of accrued interest.
    -       300,000  
                 
Series A debenture loans from a former CEO and Chairman of the Company, secured by customer contracts, payable in 36 monthly installments, maturing September and December 2015.  The loans bear interest at 12% and are convertible into common stock after 180 days. After payment of principal and interest, the holders of the Series B and Series A debentures, as a class, are entitled to receive a pro-rata share of cumulative royalties totaling 4% of the Company’s gross profits payable for the two-year period commencing at the maturity date; provided that no royalties are payable following conversion of any Series A or Series B debenture to the holder thereof.  The Company has the right to buy out each royalty by paying the lender $20,000 for every $25,000 loaned.  During fiscal year 2013, the Company paid $41,682 of the loan principal.  During fiscal year 2013, $342,912 of principal and interest were converted into 457,216 common shares.  The Company recorded $297,191 of expense associated with the induced conversion of these notes.
    -       244,196  
                 
Unsecured note payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, including a $7,500 loan origination fee, interest at 12%, due August 2012.  The note was convertible into common stock at 50% of fair market value or $0.40 per share, whichever is less.  During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued a Series A debenture payable to the entity in satisfaction of the outstanding balance of $82,500 plus $3,716 of accrued interest.
    -       82,500  
                 
Unsecured note payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, including a $7,500 loan origination fee, interest at 12%, due September 2012. The note was convertible into common stock at $0.40 per share or 50% of market value, whichever was less.  During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued a Series A debenture payable to the entity in satisfaction of the outstanding balance of $82,500 plus $3,173 of accrued interest.
    -       82,500  
 
 
F - 22

 
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Notes payable to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, including a $26,000 loan origination fee which was convertible into Series D preferred stock at any time at $2.00 per share, interest at 15%, due December 2012.  This note was secured by real estate.  During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued a Series A debenture payable to the entity in satisfaction of the outstanding balance of $51,000 plus $3,186 of accrued interest.  Upon the conversion of the note, the Company immediately recognized the unamortized debt discount of $14,238.
  $ -     $ 51,000  
                 
Total before discount and current portion
    1,896,135       1,957,161  
Less discount
    (3,720 )     (223,381 )
                 
Total notes payable, related-party
    1,892,415       1,733,780  
Less current portion
    (1,892,415 )     (1,563,923 )
                 
Total  notes payable, related-party, net of current portion
  $ -     $ 169,857  

The total principal on related-party notes payable of $1,892,415 is schedule to be repaid during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014.
 
11.           Loss on Induced Conversion of Debt and Sale of Common Stock
 
The Company offered an induced conversion rate to all debt holders at a rate of $0.75 per share of common stock, which was below the market price of the stock.  Debt and accrued interest of approximately $10,004,000 was converted to shares of common stock. The Company also offered the private placement of common stock to existing investors at $0.75 per share, which was below the market price.  The difference between the offered price and the market price of all common stock issued was approximately $9,356,000 and is recorded as a loss on induced conversion of debt and sale of common stock.
 
12.           Fair Value Measurements
 
The Company measured the fair values of its assets and liabilities using the US GAAP hierarchy levels as follows:
 
Level 1
The Company does not have any Level 1 inputs available to measure its assets.
   
Level 2
The Company’s embedded derivative liabilities are measured on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs.
   
Level 3
The Company’s goodwill is measured using Level 3 inputs.
 
The Company’s embedded derivative liabilities are re-measured to fair value as of each reporting date until the contingency is resolved.  See Note 13 below for more information about these liabilities and the inputs used for calculating fair value.
 
13.           Derivative Liabilities
 
As described in Notes 9 and 10, the Company has issued convertible notes payable with variable conversion options.  The Company has determined the conversion options of certain notes payable are subject to derivative liability treatment and are required to be accounted for at fair value.  The derivative liabilities for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $795,151 and $4,015,855, respectively.  The derivative liability as of September 30, 2012 was eliminated during fiscal year 2013 as a result of the 10-for-1 reverse common stock split, this decreased the number of outstanding shares and convertible shares of “freestanding instruments”, such that the Company can reserve sufficient shares to settle “freestanding instruments.”
 
 
F - 23

 
 
During fiscal year 2013, the Company estimated the fair value of the embedded derivatives using a binomial option-pricing model with the following assumptions: conversion price of $0.75 per share according to the agreements; risk free interest rate of 0.10% to 0.11%; expected life of 0.83 to 1.00 years; expected dividends of zero; a volatility factor of 200% to 229%; and a stock price of $1.45.  The expected lives of the instruments are equal to the average term of the conversion option.  The expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of the Company’s common stock.  The risk-free interest rate represents the U.S. Treasury constant maturities rate for the expected life of the related conversion option. The dividend yield represents anticipated cash dividends to be paid over the expected life of the conversion option.  The loss on derivative liabilities for the fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was $333,406 and $2,104,389, respectively.
 
14.          Preferred Stock
 
The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.00001 per share.  Pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors has the authority to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, without further stockholder approval, to designate and determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of the preferred stock before any issuance of the preferred stock and to create one or more series of preferred stock, fix the number of shares of each such series, and determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of each series of preferred stock, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, and liquidation preferences.
 
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
 
On October 4, 2011, the Company issued 480,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock (“Series C preferred stock”) in connection with the patent license agreement settlement (see Note 6).  The par value of the Series C is $0.00001 per share.  The Series C preferred stock is non-voting stock.  Each share of Series C preferred stock may be converted into one share of common stock, provided, however, that a holder may not convert shares of Series C preferred stock which, upon conversion, would result in the holder becoming the beneficial owner of more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company.
 
During fiscal year 2012, the Company amended the rights and preferences of the Series C preferred stock as follows:
 
·
Required payment of dividends at a rate of 8% per annum in either cash or common stock at the Company’s discretion.  If paid in common stock, the price of the common stock is the average closing price of the last 10 trading days of each quarter; and
   
·
Permitted conversion of the Series C preferred stock into common stock at any time after June 30, 2012.
 
During fiscal year 2013, the Company issued 9,062 shares of Series D preferred stock for accrued dividends of $53,992 associated with Series C preferred stock.  During fiscal year 2012, the Company issued 10,218 shares of Series D preferred stock for accrued dividends of $35,763 associated with Series C preferred stock.
 
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
 
On October 4, 2011, the Board of Directors designated 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock as Series D convertible preferred stock (“Series D preferred stock”).  As originally designated, the Series D preferred stock vested immediately upon issuance, and each share of Series D preferred stock was convertible into one share of common stock.  The original designation also provided that the Series D preferred stock was non-voting and would not receive dividends.  In addition, conversion of the Series D preferred stock was limited to not more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding common stock.
 
 
F - 24

 
 
During fiscal year 2012, the Board of Directors approved the following amendments to the designation of the rights and preferences of the Series D preferred stock prior to the issuance of any of the shares:
 
·
Changed the conversion ratio from  one share of common stock for one share of Series D preferred stock to  five shares of common stock for one share of Series D preferred stock;
   
·
Added an annual dividend rate of 8%, payable in stock or cash quarterly beginning April 1, 2012;
   
·
Changed the shares from non-voting to voting, on an as-converted basis;
   
·
Eliminated the 4.99% conversion limitation;
   
·
Permitted conversion of the Series D preferred stock, commencing April 1, 2012;
   
·
Permitted the Company, at its option, to redeem the Series D preferred shares at a redemption price equal to 120% of the original purchase with 15 days notice.
 
During fiscal year 2013, the Company issued the following shares of Series D preferred stock:
 
·
103,843 shares for $817,482 in loan origination fees;
   
·
71,800 shares for advisory services through December 2014, the value on the date of grant was $230,800;
   
·
20,000 shares for consulting services through December 2013, the value on the date of grant was $60,000;
   
·
52,913 shares for $150,000 in previously accrued Board of Directors’ fees and $61,652 of compensation for services;
   
·
46,300 shares for a bonus to an officer for services, the value on the date of grant was $234,700;
   
·
9,062 shares for dividends on Series C preferred stock, the value on the date of grant was $53,992;
   
·
5,025 shares for dividends on Series D preferred stock, the value on the date of grant was $31,689;
   
·
126,117 shares for consulting services by an entity controlled by an officer of the Company, which were previously accrued in the amount of $564,280;
   
·
85,000 shares to an entity controlled by an officer of the Company for consulting services, the value on the date of grant was $455,000;
   
·
80,000 shares for a bonus to the CEO of the Company for signing an employment agreement with the Company, the value at the date of grant was $320,000, which cannot convert to common stock until the Company has 20,000 members;
   
·
2,055 shares for services with value of $14,899 on the date of grant.
 
During fiscal year 2013, an employee of the Company converted 50,000 shares of Series D preferred stock into 250,000 shares of common stock.  The Company also accrued $232,834 of dividends on Series D preferred stock and settled the accrued dividends by issuing 5,025 shares of Series D preferred stock and 143,465 shares of common stock during fiscal year 2013.
 
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock
 
During fiscal year 2013, the Board of Directors designated shares of preferred stock as Series E convertible preferred stock (“Series E preferred stock”).  The Series E preferred stock vests immediately upon issuance. Series E preferred stock is convertible into common stock at $1.00 per share, the conversion price is adjustable if there are distributions of common stock or stock split by the Company.  The designation also provides that the Series E preferred stock would be non-voting and would receive a monthly dividend of 3.322% for 25 to 32 months.  In addition, the convertibility and the redemption price of the Series E preferred stock is gradually reduced by dividend payments over 25 to 32 months.  After the dividend payment term, the redemption price of Series E preferred stock is $0 and the Series E preferred stock has no convertibility to common stock.
 
During fiscal year 2013, $614,765 of debenture loans and accrued interests converted into 61,723 shares of Series E preferred stock.  During fiscal year 2013, the Company paid dividends of $17,271 to Series E shareholders.  As of September 30, 2013, the redemption price for the Series E preferred stock was $601,585.
 
Liquidation Preference
 
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, before any distribution or payment may be made to the holders of the common stock, the holders of the Series C, Series D, and Series E preferred stock are entitled to be paid out of the assets an amount equal to $1.00 per share plus all accrued but unpaid dividends.  If the assets of the Company are insufficient to make payment in full to all holders of preferred stock, then the assets shall be distributed among the holders of preferred stock ratably in proportion to the full amounts to which they would otherwise be respectively entitled.
 
 
F - 25

 
 
15.          Common Stock
 
During fiscal year 2013, the Company issued the following shares of common stock:
 
·
327,382 shares valued at $458,929 as compensation for services to six independent consultants;
   
·
220,000 shares valued at $318,000 as compensation for two key employees as an incentive to work for the Company.  The stock vests according to the terms of the employment agreements;
   
·
27,650 shares for employee bonuses valued at the date of grant at $39,825;
   
·
350,000 shares valued at $350,000 for option exercises from employee bonuses granted by the Company;
   
·
150,000 shares valued at $187,500 for an employment contract extension with a key employee;
   
·
25,000 shares valued at $31,750 to medical advisory board members for services through September 2014;
   
·
25,000 shares valued at $31,750 for services provided by a board member;
   
·
141,987 shares as loan origination fees at a value of $387,849;
   
·
4,758 shares valued at $7,137 for the extension of related-party payables;
   
·
40,000 shares valued at $61,500 for the extension of third-party notes payable;
   
·
13,439,190 shares for the conversion of outstanding debt in the amount of $18,467,123;
   
·
2,600 shares valued at $3,900 as part of the issuance of $26,000 of new debt to a related party;
   
·
166,200 shares valued at $225,300 to settle an accrued liability of $126,200;
   
·
250,000 shares for the conversion of 50,000 shares of Series D preferred stock;
   
·
425,000 shares for the exercise of options held by two key managers of GWire;
   
·
200,625 shares valued at $232,765 as dividends accrued for Series C and Series D preferred stock holders;
   
·
1,313,334 shares valued at $1,842,334 for cash of $985,000;
   
·
29,600 shares to employees in accordance with a restricted stock agreement:
 
During fiscal year 2012, the Company issued the following shares of common stock:
 
·
60,000 shares for settlement of a patent license agreement, with value on the date of grant of $240,000;
   
·
129,161 shares for consulting services, with value on the date of grant of $218,906;
   
·
60,000 shares for settlement of $312,000 of accrued liabilities;
   
·
200,000 shares in connection with a settlement agreement.  During fiscal year 2010, the Company granted Class D warrants for the purchase of 158,416 shares of common stock and Class E warrants for the purchase of 41,584 shares of common stock.  During fiscal year 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the holders of these warrants to resolve claims of the holders regarding their conversion of shares of preferred stock.  Under the settlement agreement, the holders exchanged the Class D and Class E warrants for 200,000 shares of common stock and the warrants were cancelled.  The Company recognized $500,000 of expense due to the conversion;
   
·
231,000 shares from conversion of related–party, short-term notes payable in the amount of $92,400; and
   
·
100,000 shares for loan origination fees of $70,000.
 
In June 2011, the Company entered into a service contract with a former CEO for services to be rendered from October 2010 through September 2014.  As part of this service contract, the Company issued 400,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value on the date of grant of $1,840,000, as payment for past and future services.  During fiscal year 2012, the Company accelerated the vesting of the shares and recognized the residual compensation expense of $1,380,000 related to the issuance of these shares.
 
 
F - 26

 
 
In fiscal year 2010, the Company awarded certain employees restricted stock totaling 67,900 shares, valued at $916,650, in connection with Company milestones.  In fiscal year 2013, the Company issued 29,600 restricted shares of common stock valued at $399,600, and reduced the shares of non-vested common stock by 25,700 shares due to the change of employment status of individuals.  In fiscal year 2012, no restricted shares of common stock were issued to employees.  During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $0 and $168,419, respectively.  As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, the unrecognized stock-based compensation was $0 and $245,952, respectively, and will be recognized over the remaining vesting terms.
 
16.           Stock Options and Warrants
 
The fair value of each stock option or warrant is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial option-pricing model.  The expected life of stock options or warrants represents the period of time that the stock options or warrants are expected to be outstanding, based on the simplified method.  Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock, among other factors.  The Company uses the simplified method within the valuation model due to the Company’s short trading history.  The risk-free rate related to the expected term of the stock option or warrants is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.  The dividend yield is zero.
 
During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company measured the fair value of the warrants using a binomial valuation model with the following assumptions:

 
2013
 
2012
Exercise price
 $0.75 - $10.00
 
 $0.40 - .44
Expected term (years)
1.5 - 2.5
 
2.5
Volatility
219% - 298%
 
131% - 135%
Risk-free rate
0.23% - 0.88%
 
0.39% - 0.44%
Dividend rate
0%
 
0%
 
During fiscal year 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense relating to the following stock options and warrants:
 
·
Options to purchase 433,333 shares were granted to each of three employees of 4G, 1,300,000 total shares, as part of their employment agreements dated June 21, 2012, with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. These options vest as described in Note 4. The options expire in June 2017. The value of the options at the date of grant was $1,147,163. The Company amortizes the expense based on expected completion dates of the milestones. During fiscal year 2013, the Company recognized $846,898 of the total compensation expense. As of September 30, 2013, options for 260,000 shares have vested.
   
·
Options to purchase 1,000,000 shares were granted to the Company’s CEO for services as part of his employment agreement dated July 2012, with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. One tenth (100,000 shares) of the options vest for each milestone of 5,000 additional members added to the Company since the beginning of his employment in July 2012 until fully vested. The options expire in July 2017. The Company amortizes the expense based on expected completion dates of the milestones. During fiscal year 2013, the Company recognized $660,140 of the total compensation expense. As of September 30, 2013, options for 500,000 shares have vested due to the Company reaching certain milestones according to the contract. In August 2013, the CEO exercised options to purchase 350,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.
   
·
Options to purchase 212,500 shares were granted to both key managers of GWire, 425,000 in aggregate, with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. Under the option agreements, the only method of exercise requires the employee to submit up to 212,500 shares of GWire stock, awarded as part of the employment agreements dated November 1, 2012 to the Company in exchange for equivalent shares of the Company’s common stock, up to $425,000 in total. The options were fully vested upon issuance. In April 2013, both managers converted all of these options together with 4,250,000 shares of GWire stock into 425,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As a result, the Company owns 100% of GWire as of June 30, 2013.
   
·
Options to purchase 25,300 shares were granted to GWire employees, with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options vested immediately and the Company recognized $32,572 as compensation expense during fiscal year 2013.
   
·
Options to purchase 100,000 shares were granted as part of an employment agreement signed with a new employee dated May 2013, with an exercise price of $1.65 per share. One quarter (25,000 shares) of the options vest after one year and the remaining balance vests equally over the following nine quarters (8,333 per quarter). The options expire in May 2018. During fiscal year 2013, the Company recognized $12,689 of compensation expense associated with the options.
   
·
Options to purchase 100,000 shares were granted as part of a loan extension agreement with an unrelated party, with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options vested immediately and the Company recognized $103,495 of interest expense during fiscal year 2013.
   
·
Options to purchase 100,000 shares were granted for consulting services rendered by a third party, with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options vested immediately and the Company recognized $134,785 of consulting expense during fiscal year 2013.
   
·
Options to purchase 36,667 shares were granted as loan due diligence fees to an unrelated party, with an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The options vested immediately and the Company recorded $51,492 as loan discount, which is being amortized over the life of the loan.  During fiscal year 2013, the Company recognized $8,317 as interest expense for the loan discount amortization.
 
 
F - 27

 
 
The following table summarizes information about stock options and warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2013:
Options and Warrants
 
Number of Options
 and Warrants
   
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
 
Outstanding as of October 1, 2012
    2,386,587     $ 1.47  
Granted
    2,086,967       1.04  
Exercised
    (875,000 )     1.00  
Forfeited
    -       -  
Outstanding as of September 30, 2013
    3,598,554       1.33  
Exercisable as of September 30, 2013
    2,271,887       1.50  
 
As of September 30, 2013, the outstanding warrants have an aggregate intrinsic value of $434,890, and the weighted average remaining term of the warrants is 3.13 years.
 
17.           Segment Information
 
The Company operates two business segments based primarily on the nature of the Company’s products. The Chronic Illness Monitoring segment is engaged in the business of developing, distributing and marketing mobile monitoring of patient vital signs and physical activity to self-insured companies. The CareServices segment is engaged in the business of developing, distributing and marketing mobile health monitoring and concierge services to distributors and consumers. The Company previously operated a reagents business which was sold in June 2013.  The Company no longer holds any ownership interest in the reagents business.
 
Additionally, at the corporate level, the Company raises capital and provides for the administrative operations of the Company as a whole.
 
 
F - 28

 
 
The following table reflects certain financial information relating to each reportable segment for fiscal years 2013 and 2012:

   
Corporate
   
Chronic
 Illness Monitoring
   
CareServices
   
Reagents
   
Total
 
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2013
                             
Sales to external customers
  $ -     $ 9,738,988     $ 1,660,544     $ 351,645     $ 11,751,177  
Segment loss
    (21,986,526 )     (460,017 )     (3,179,151 )     (5,312 )     (25,631,006 )
Interest expense, net
    5,583,932       -       -       -       5,583,932  
Segment assets
    600,892       9,482,037       2,291,121       -       12,374,050  
Fixed assets and leased equipment purchases
    243,273       -       241,527       888       485,688  
Depreciation and amortization
    124,269       114,440       984,663       9,362       1,232,734  
                                         
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2012
                                       
Sales to external customers
  $ -     $ 706,888     $ 352,223     $ 467,259     $ 1,526,370  
Segment loss
    (11,298,372 )     (532,207 )     (389,187 )     (145,990 )     (12,365,756 )
Interest expense, net
    858,224       -       -       -       858,224  
Segment assets
    397,557       1,957,779       3,224,579       296,039       5,875,954  
Fixed assets and leased equipment purchases
    93,315       -       257,857       -       351,172  
Depreciation and amortization
    304,841       -       64,348       16,296       385,485  

18.           Income Taxes
 
As of September 30, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income, if any, of approximately $51,800,000, which will begin to expire in 2027.  The utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards is dependent upon the tax laws in effect at the time the net operating loss carryforwards can be utilized.  The Internal Revenue Code contains provisions that likely could reduce or limit the availability and utilization of these net operating loss carryforwards.  For example, limitations are imposed on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards if certain ownership changes have taken place or will take place.  The Company will perform an analysis to determine whether any such limitations have occurred as the net operating losses are utilized.
The amount and ultimate realization of the benefits from the net operating loss carryforwards are dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, the Company’s future earnings, and other future events, the effects of which cannot be determined. The Company has established a valuation allowance against all deferred income tax assets not offset by deferred income tax liabilities due to the uncertainty of their realization. Accordingly, there is no benefit for income taxes in the accompanying statements of operations.
 
Deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated future effects of differences between the consolidated financial reporting and income tax reporting bases of assets and liabilities given the provisions of currently enacted tax laws and the tax rates expected to be in place.  For fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company’s expected federal tax rate was 34%.
 
The deferred income tax assets (liabilities) were comprised of the following as of September 30:

   
2013
   
2012
 
Net operating loss carryforwards
  $ 19,330,000     $ 11,807,000  
Depreciation, amortization and reserves
    453,000       101,000  
Stock-based compensation
    1,863,000       1,113,000  
Accrued vacation
    2,000       20,000  
Valuation allowance
    (21,648,000 )     (13,041,000 )
                 
      Total
  $ -     $ -  

 
F - 29

 

Reconciliations between the benefit for income taxes at the federal statutory income tax rate and the Company’s benefit for income taxes for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

   
2013
   
2012
 
Federal income tax benefit at statutory rate
  $ 8,715,000     $ 4,204,000  
State income tax benefit, net of federal income tax effect
    846,000       408,000  
Non-deductible expenses
    (954,000 )     (804,000 )
Change in valuation allowance
    (8,607,000 )     (3,808,000 )
                 
Benefit for income taxes
  $ -     $ -  
 
During fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized no interest or penalties, and there were no changes in unrecognized tax benefits from tax positions taken or from lapsed statutes of limitations.  There were no settlements with taxing authorities.  As of September 30, 2013, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, and there are no positions that are anticipated to significantly increase or decrease.  The Company had no tax examinations beginning, ending, or remaining in process as of and for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.  Tax returns for fiscal years subsequent to 2009 remain subject to examination.
 
19.           Commitments and Contingencies
 
The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating leases.  Future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of September 30, 2013 were as follows:

Years Ending September 30,
     
2014
  $ 277,603  
2015
    308,330  
2016
    317,580  
2017
    327,107  
2018
    280,077  
         
    $ 1,510,697  
 
The Company’s rent expense for facilities held under non-cancelable operating leases for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 was approximately $268,000 and $204,000, respectively.
 
In May 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement and patent license agreement and an agreed motion was filed to dismiss all claims of a lawsuit.  The final payment required by the settlement agreement and patent license patent agreement was made in December, 2013.
 
 
F - 30

 

20.           Subsequent Events
 
Subsequent to September 30, 2013, the Company entered into the following agreements and transactions:
 
(1)
In October 2013, the Company entered into a loan conversion agreement with an investor.  The Company issued 8,347 shares of Series E preferred stock for the conversion of a Series A debenture agreement representing principal and interest in the amount of $83,473.
   
(2)
In November 2013, the Company entered into a loan conversion agreements with two investors.  The Company issued 441,735 shares of common stock for the conversion of a note payable representing principal and interest in the amount of $331,301.
   
(3)
In December 2013, the Company designated 7,803 shares of preferred stock as Series F variable rate convertible preferred stock and completed the sale of $3,120,000 in 8% original issue shares of Series F preferred stock.  The Company received $2,835,771 cash after fees and expenses.   As part of the transaction consultants invested an additional $220,000 under subscription agreements to purchase 247 shares of Series F preferred stock.  In addition, the Company issued 3,495,000 warrants exercisable at $1.10 per share for five years as part of the overall transaction.
   
(4)
In December 2013, the Company entered into a loan conversion agreement with one of its debt holders.  The Company issued 857 shares of Series F preferred stock for the conversion of a note payable representing principal and interest in the amount of $573,868.  In addition, the Company issued 856,977 warrants exercisable at $1.10 per share for five years.
   
(5)
In December 2013, the Company entered into a loan conversion agreement with a related party.  The Company issued 1,883,675 shares of common stock for the conversion of a note payable representing principal and interest in the amount of $1,126,026.  In addition, the Company issued 410,348 warrants exercisable at $1.10 per share for five years.
   
(6)
In December 2013, the Company entered into a loan conversion agreement with a related party.  The Company issued 1,100,110 shares of common stock for the conversion of a note payable representing principal and interest in the amount of $659,474.  In addition, the Company issued 239,652 warrants exercisable at $1.10 per share for five years.
   
(7)
In December 2013, the Company entered into a loan conversion agreement with the Company’s chief executive officer.  The Company issued 213,334 shares of common stock for the conversion of a note payable representing principal and interest in the amount of $160,000.
   
(8)
In December 2013, an investor converted 480,000 shares of Series C preferred stock to 672,000 shares of common stock.
   
(9)
In December 2013, related party and non-related party investors converted 893,218 shares of Series D preferred stock to 6,252,526 shares of common stock.
   
(10)
In December 2013, the Company entered into a loan conversion agreement with one of its debt holders.  The Company issued 66,667 shares of common stock for the conversion of a note payable representing principal and interest in the amount of $50,000.
 
 
F - 31