1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CASTRO v. ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
 

CASTRO v. ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

Case No. 14-cv-05359-YGR.

MARLEY CASTRO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 2, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marley Castro, Plaintiff, represented by Mana Barari , Sundeen Salinas and Pyle, Hunter Pyle , Sundeen Salinas & Pyle, Linda Pham Lam , Lewis Feinberg Lee & Jackson, P.C. & Todd F. Jackson , Lewis Feinberg Lee Renaker & Jackson, P.C..

Lucia Marmolejo, Plaintiff, represented by Mana Barari , Sundeen Salinas and Pyle, Hunter Pyle , Sundeen Salinas & Pyle, Linda Pham Lam , Lewis Feinberg Lee & Jackson, P.C. & Todd F. Jackson , Lewis Feinberg Lee Renaker & Jackson, P.C..

ABM Industries Incorporated, Defendant, represented by Theane Evangelis Kapur , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Bradley Joseph Hamburger , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Katherine V.A. Smith , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP & Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

ABM Janitorial Services, Inc., Defendant, represented by Theane Evangelis Kapur , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Bradley Joseph Hamburger , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Katherine V.A. Smith , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP & Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

ABM Onsite Services - West, Inc., Defendant, represented by Theane Evangelis Kapur , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Bradley Joseph Hamburger , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Katherine V.A. Smith , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP & Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

ABM Services Inc, Defendant, represented by Theane Evangelis Kapur , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

ABM Janitorial Services - Northern California Inc, Defendant, represented by Theane Evangelis Kapur , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND Re: Dkt. No. 25

This putative class action generally stems from allegations that defendants required their janitorial employees to use personal cell phones for work-related purposes without reimbursement, in violation of California Labor Code section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases