1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HAYES v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
 

HAYES v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 70735-3-I.

LINDSAY HAYES and MATT ROSSTON, husband and wife; JAMES W. BEASLEY II; and all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company doing business in the State of Washington; UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a foreign intrainsurance exchange doing business in the State of Washington; USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company doing business in the State of Washington; GARRISON PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company doing business in the State of Washington; JOHN DOES I-XX, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

Filed: February 17, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Joel Crane , Crane Dunham PLLC, 2121 5th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98121-2510, David Elliot Breskin , Breskin Johnson & Townsend PLLC, 1000 Second Avenue Suite 3670, Seattle, WA, 98104, Counsel for Petitioners.

Hugh Handeyside , Attorney at Law, 125 Broad St Fl 17, New York, NY, 10004-2458, Marci A. Eisenstein , Schiff Hardin LLP, 233 S. Wacker Drive Suite 6600, Chicago, IL, 60606, Jay Williams , Schiff Hardin LLP, 233 S. Wacker Drive Suite 6600, Chicago, IL, 60606, Aphrodite Kokolis , Schiff Hardin LLP, 233 S. Wacker Drive Suite 6600, Chicago, IL, 60606, David C. Scott , Schiff Hardin LLP, 233 S. Wacker Drive, #6600, Chicago, IL, 60606, Michael A Moore , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner & Pree, 1001 4th Ave Ste 3900, Seattle, WA, 98154-1051, David Benjamin Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Preece, 1001 4th Ave Ste 3900, Seattle, WA, 98154-1051, Counsel for Respondents.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

DWYER, J.

The appellants in this insurance coverage dispute filed suit in King County Superior Court on their own behalf and on behalf of all persons similarly situated within the State of Washington. After the respondents removed the case to federal court, the appellants, by representing to the federal court that the scope of their claims were narrower than as characterized by the respondents, secured a remand to King County Superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases