1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RUSSO v. HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION
 

RUSSO v. HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION

No. A-1861-10T4.

ANTHONY RUSSO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 29, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danielle S. Chandonnet argued the cause for appellant (Shebell & Shebell, LLC, attorneys; Ms. Chandonnet, on the brief).

Michael J. Dillon argued the cause for respondent (Krumholz, Dillon, P.A. and Lago & O'Toole, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Dillon, on the brief).

Before Judges Messano and Espinosa.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Anthony Russo, appeals from the October 29, 2010 order of the Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, dismissing his petition for benefits with prejudice. We have considered the arguments raised in light of the record and applicable legal standards. We affirm.

On February 24, 2004, Russo filed a petition for benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases