UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2013

or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________

DATAJACK, INC.
(Formerly known as Quamtel, Inc.)
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

14911 Quorum Drive, Suite 370, Dallas, Texas 75254
(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(972) 361-1980
(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes [   ]    No [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity as of November 19, 2013 is 148,208,156.

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

6

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

7

NOTE 1 – BUSINESS

Description of Business

DataJack, Inc. (formerly Quamtel, Inc.) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) was incorporated in 1999 under the laws of Nevada as a communications company offering, a comprehensive range of mobile broadband and communications products.

The Company offers secure nationwide mobile broadband wireless data transmission services primarily under the DataJack brand. Through DataJack, the Company offers low cost, no contract, mobile broadband with various data plans. The Company’s DataJack service is offered primarily through two devices - the DataJack WiFi Mobile Hotspot that can connect up to 5 Wi-Fi enabled devices and the DataJack USB, a Plug and Play USB Device.

The Company’s communication products included an international calling service delivered under the brand WQN, through the Company’s subsidiary, WQN, Inc. (“WQN”), and an enhanced toll free service delivered under the brand “800.com.” The Company also sold a prepaid international calling service, “EasyTalk,” that delivered low cost international calls to consumers and businesses from anywhere in the United States or Canada to over 196 countries globally.

Effective January 17, 2013, we attempted to sell substantially all of the intangible assets of WQN which included WQN, Easy Talk, Premium, Value, Easy Talk Mexico, Easy Talk Cuba and India Easy Talk telecommunications services, prepaid products and related technology to Business Telecommunications Services, Inc. for $250,000 subject to agreed adjustments and contingent liabilities and payment based on a prescribed installment schedule and subject to FCC approval of the transaction. The transaction was never consummated since both parties rescinded the agreement prior to FCC approval.

Effective June 5, 2013, DataJack, Inc. sold certain intangible and other assets of ITG, Inc. to iTalk, Inc. The assets included in the sale were certain domain names, licenses, service contracts including trade names and trademarks. and all rights and interests to and in all of the customers of the International Long Distance division of DataJack, Inc., including but without limitation all the customers and/or subscribers of VoIP, ITG, EasyTalk and Valucom. The purchase price of $300,000. The tangible and intangible assets sold had no remaining net book value prior to the transaction.

The assets sold primarily related to brands focused on convenient features and the delivery of low cost international calls to consumers and businesses. The sales transaction did not include the transfer of any of the Company’s employees or the VOIP switching equipment since these resources are still being used for the Company’s remaining business. The Company also determined that the assets sold and related cash flows could not be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity. As a result, the Company has concluded the transaction did not qualify as discontinued operations.

As a result of the sale, the Company adjusted the remaining deferred income applicable to the assets sold as described above resulting in a total gain on sale of domain name of $457,920. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has an outstanding payable of $14,227 from the acquirer as shown with accrued expenses in the Company’s September 30, 2013 balance sheet.

The Company has estimated the customer base sold accounted for approximately 47% of the Company’s consolidated revenues in 2012.

8

NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Interim Financial Statements

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 contained herein have been derived from audited financial statements.

Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 16, 2013.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DataJack, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries WQN Inc., Data Jack, Inc. (incorporated in the State of Texas), and Novotel, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company makes operating decisions, assesses performance and manages the business as one reportable segment

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows the guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements. SAB 104 states that revenue is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenues are primarily derived from fees charged to terminate voice services over the Company’s network and from related monthly recurring charges. Variable revenue is earned based on the number of minutes during a call and is recognized upon completion of a call. Revenue from each customer is calculated from information received through the Company’s network switches. The Company tracks the information received from the switch and analyzes the call detail records and applies the respective revenue rate for each call. Fixed revenue is earned from monthly recurring services provided to customers that are fixed and recurring in nature, and are connected for a specified period of time. Revenues are recognized as the services are provided and continue until the expiration of the contract or until cancellation of the service by the customer. Cash fees received prior to call completion are recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as unearned revenue. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company recorded unearned revenue of $-0- and $153,930, respectively.

9

Economic Dependency

The Company utilizes a limited number of suppliers. The Company is vulnerable to the risk of renewing favorable supplier contracts and timeliness of the supplier in processing the Company’s orders for customers, and is at risk related to regulation and regulatory developments that govern the rates to be charged to the Company and, in some instances, whether certain facilities are required to be made available to the Company.

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions are recognized in the statement of operations. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will be remeasured each reporting period. The Company’s common shares issued as additional compensation and for consulting services have been valued at the shares’ exchange-quoted market prices at their respective dates of issuance or commitment. Compensation cost will be recognized over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award.

Net Loss per Common Share, basic and diluted

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 260-10, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260-10”) specifying the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements of earnings per share information. Basic loss per share has been calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Potential shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debt of 39,895,362 have been excluded as common stock equivalents in the diluted loss per share because their effect is anti-dilutive on the computation as of September 30, 2013.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities; disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements; and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all cash on hand, in banks, certificates of deposit and other highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase, to be cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash represents collateral on a standby letter of credit related to an agreement with one of the Company’s telecommunications service providers, effectively providing a guarantee of the Company’s payment of its account payable to this service provider.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to prior periods' data to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported net income.

10

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect from outstanding balances. Management provides for probable uncollectible amounts based on its assessment of the current status of the individual receivables and after using reasonable collection efforts. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was zero.

Inventories

Inventories consist of Data Jack’s proprietary USB devices which provide customers the ability to deliver nationwide mobile 3G data coverage. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market determined by the first in, first out (FIFO) method.

Prepaid Expenses and Deposits

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, prepaid expenses and deposits consisted primarily of cash deposit payments made to several of the Company’s service providers.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. If it is more likely than not that some portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance is recognized.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10. ASC 740-10-25 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company does not believe it has any material unrecognized income tax positions.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 825-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. ASC 825-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825-10 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

11

Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

Items recorded or measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the accompanying consolidated financial statements consisted of the following items as of September 30, 2013:

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities (derivative liability) for the six months ended September 30, 2013.

Derivative Instrument Liability

The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other financial instruments or contracts and requires recognition of all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of hedging relationship designation. Accounting for changes in fair value of the derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships and the types of relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any derivative instruments that were designated as hedges.

12

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There were various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has reported a recurring net loss of $1,435,556 and $4,554,949 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has reported an accumulated deficit of $24,632,233 and a working capital deficit of $3,393,928, and has been dependent on issuances of debt and equity instruments to fund its operations.

The Company intends to increase its future profitability and seek new sources or methods of revenue to pursue its business strategy. However, the Company believes that anticipated revenues from operations will continue to be insufficient to satisfy its ongoing capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. Therefore, our ability to meet our obligations and continue to operate as a going concern is highly dependent on our ability to obtain new loans or equity.

The Company cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. The Company may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, the Company may be unable to implement its current plans for expansion, repay its debt obligations as they become due, or respond to competitive pressures, any of which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, property and equipment consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 amounted to $26,909 and $68,187, respectively and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 amounted to $26,461 and $80,649, respectively.

13

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company disposed of certain property and equipment for a net proceeds of $1,250 and recorded a loss on disposal of $811.

NOTE 5 – OTHER INTANGIBLES

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, intangible assets consisted of the following:

Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 amounted to $1,569 and $4,709, respectively and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 amounted to $4,269 and $27,721, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company sold certain domain names and other intangible assets with $-0- book value for $300,000. In conjunction with the sale, the Company adjusted the related deferred revenue to a carrying value of $-0-. Accordingly, the Company recorded a gain on sale of domain names in an aggregate of $457,920.

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Steven Ivester, who is currently the Assistant Secretary of and also a consultant to the Company through a Consulting Services Agreement with iTella, Inc., has made personal advances to the Company under an Unsecured Revolving Promissory Note (the “Unsecured Note”). The Unsecured Note has a maximum amount of $1,000,000, is repayable upon demand, is non-interest bearing and is unsecured. Advances under the Unsecured Note amounted to $169,007 and $53,650 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, which are included in advances from related parties in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Effective August 1, 2009 and subsequently amended, the Company executed a Restated Consulting Services Agreement with iTella, Inc., whereby iTella, Inc. provides, at the reasonable request of the Company’s management, advanced business strategy, financing, product development and marketing advice including but not limited to day to day operations. The initial term of this agreement is for five years, and renews for additional one year terms if approved by both parties. During this agreement’s term and at the Company’s expense, iTella, Inc.will be provided an office and administrative support in Weston, Florida. iTella, Inc.’s compensation consists of the following:

14

Effective April 1, 2012 and subsequently amended on June 7, 2012, the Company executed a Restated Consulting Services Agreement with iTella, Inc., whereby iTella, Inc. provides, at the reasonable request of the Company’s management, advanced business strategy, financing, product development and marketing advice including but not limited to day to day operations.

The annual payout of the contract was reduced from $250,000 to $150,000. Also, the revenue sharing provision of the previous consulting agreement was terminated. In consideration of the reductions of compensation, the Company accrued a $280,000 payable to the Consultant. Also, in consideration of the reduction of compensation the Company issued 8,000,000 of restricted shares. The shares were recorded on the Company’s balance sheet at a value of $720,000.The $1,000,000 combined total of the $280,000 payable and the $720,000 of restricted stock issuance are recorded on the Company’s balance sheet as a deferred cost. The Consultant can call the $280,000 payable on demand. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company amortized $508,333 of this deferred cost to consulting expense. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31. 2012, the unamortized balance of the deferred costs was approximately $407,407 and $924,075, respectively.

The initial term of this agreement is for five years, and renews for additional one year terms if approved by both parties. During this agreement’s term and at the Company’s expense, iTella, Inc. will be provided an office and administrative support in Weston, Florida. iTella, Inc.’s compensation consists of the following:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 15,000,000 shares of its common stock in settlement of $700,000 of outstanding related stock based payable.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, advances from iTella (a related party) were $232,704 and $122,079, respectively, which are included in advances from related parties in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,267,500 shares of its common stock in settlement of related party obligations of $89,642. In connection with the settlement, the Company recorded a loss on settlement of related party debt of $190,670.

NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, notes payable consisted of the following:

15

As of September 30, 2013, the noncurrent portion of notes payable is scheduled to be paid in the amounts of $265,681 and $23,605 during the twelve months ending September 30, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

Promissory Notes Payable - Shareholders

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had short-term unsecured promissory notes from various shareholders totaling $737,297 and $497,803, respectively. $75,000 and $50,000 of these unsecured advances bear interest at 6% and 12% per year, respectively. The remaining unsecured advances are non-interest bearing.

Secured Note Payable – Gilbert/Sperling

Effective October 1, 2012, the Company issued and sold $700,000 in secured notes to two accredited investors in a private placement, for a cash purchase price of $700,000. The investors also received 15,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These notes are secured by substantially all of the Company's assets, bear interest at 12% per year, and are due in equal weekly installments through October 1, 2015. The 15,000,000 shares were recorded at a value of $700,000, and are classified on the Company’s balance sheets as a debt discount. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company amortized $58,333 and $174,999 of this debt discount respectively. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unamortized debt discount was $466,667 and $641,666 respectively.

Convertible Notes Payable – St George Investments

On March 30, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with St George Investments (the “St George Note”) for a principal balance of $465,000. The note was originally a short-term note payable to Warren Gilbert, one of the primary shareholders of the Company. On March 30, 2012, Warren Gilbert sold the note to St. George Investments for an amount which was not disclosed to the Company. The St George Investments note conversion notice contains a Beneficial Conversion Feature (BCF). The Company accordingly recorded a BCF of $298,077, as a credit to additional paid in capital with offsetting amounts of $187,500 to other expense and $110,577 to debt discount, a contra liability account, which was written off by September 30, 2012, the maturity date of the St George Note. The Company also recognized an additional original-issue debt discount of $135,127, which was charged to other expense by September 30, 2012.

16

The St George Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum, compound daily. All interest and principal was due on September 30, 2012. The St George Note was convertible into common stock, at St George Investments’ option, at a fixed conversion price of $0.375 per share from March 30, 2012 until September 1, 2012, and commencing September 2, 2012 the conversion price is 65% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices of the common stock during the 10 trading day period prior to conversion. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, (i) the outstanding balance shall increase to 112.5% of the outstanding balance immediately prior to the occurrence of such event of default; provided, however, that such increase may not be applied more than twice, and (ii) this St George Note shall accrue interest until the outstanding balance is repaid in full at the rate of 1% per month (or 12% per annum), compounding daily, whether before or after judgment.

St George Investments shall have the option, in its sole discretion, to return all or any part of the conversion shares or cancelled shares to the Company by providing one or more written notices thereof to the Company but not exceed 953,846 shares. The St George Investments converted total of $426,206 of accrued interest, penalty and principal amount during the year ended December 31, 2012 and returned $58,486 or 953,846 shares of conversion made in September 2012. See Note 10 for related litigation.

The Company has identified embedded derivatives related to the St George Note. These embedded derivatives include certain conversion features and reset provisions. See Note 8.

Convertible Notes Payable – JMJ Financial

The Company entered into a convertible promissory notes with JMJ Financial (the “JMJ Note”) for an aggregate principal balance of $220,000. The principal sum of the notes consisted of $200,000 of consideration paid, plus a $20,000 original issue discount (OID) or 10% OID. The note has a provision which allows the Company to draw down the available principal over time. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company had drawn down $82,500 and $55,000, respectively.

The JMJ Note bears a one-time interest charge of 10% of the principal amount. The maturity date is one year from the Effective Date of each payment received by the Company and is the date upon which the principal sum of this JMJ Note, as well as any unpaid interest and other fees, shall be due and payable. The JMJ Note is convertible into common stock, at JMJ Financial’s option at any time after the Effective Date, at the conversion price of lesser of $0.07 per share or 70% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days prior to the conversion. In the event of any default, the outstanding principal amount of this JMJ Note, plus accrued but unpaid interest, liquidated damages, fees and other amounts owing in respect thereof through the date of acceleration, shall become, at JMJ Financial’s election, immediately due and payable in cash at the Mandatory Default Amount.

The Company has identified embedded derivatives related to the JMJ Note. These embedded derivatives include certain conversion features and reset provisions. See Note 8.

Note Payable – Vanderbur

On June 22, 2012, the Company entered into a $25,000, zero percent, note payable with Gene and Lois Vanderbur. The principal of the note was due and payable on December 22, 2012. The Company was required to pay a $5,000 participation fee to execute the note and the Company issued the bearer 62,500 shares of DataJack common stock as additional cost of entering the note. The terms of the note will allow the Company to add additional $25,000 tranches of debt up to a maximum of $100,000. The total loan cost of $8,750 was capitalized to deferred cost, all of which amortized to non-interest expenses by December 31, 2012.

17

On September 7, 2012, the Company entered into a $15,000, zero percent, note payable with Gene and Lois Vanderbur. The principal of the note was due and payable on October 20, 2012, and remains unpaid. The Company has committed to pay a $5,000 participation fee to execute the note and the Company has committed to issue the bearer 20,000 shares of DataJack common stock as additional cost of entering the note. The total loan cost of $7,400 was capitalized to deferred cost, all of which amortized to non-interest expenses by December 31, 2012.

Note Payable – LG Capital

On June 19, 2013, the Company entered into a $32,000, 8% per annum, note payable with LG Capital Funding, LLC. The principal together with the interest is due at maturity of March 19, 2014. The Company was required to issue 10,000,000 shares of its common stock to be held in escrow as collateral.

The LG Capital Note was convertible into common stock, at LG Capitals’ option, at a conversion price is 51% of the average of the two lowest closing bid prices of the common stock during the 10 trading day period prior to conversion.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock in payment of $4,000 of the LG Capital note payable.

The Company has identified embedded derivatives related to the St George Note. These embedded derivatives include certain conversion features and reset provisions. See Note 8.

Other Note Obligations

The AFS/IBEX note is associated with an insurance policy, is repayable in equal monthly payments of $2,128 through June 2013, is unsecured, and bears interest at 8.3% per year. The note was fully paid as of September 30, 2013.

The Dell Financial note is related to a disputed computer purchase in 2007.

NOTE 8– DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

The Company’s St George, JMJ and LG Capital Notes can be converted into the Company’s common shares, at the holders’ option, at the conversion rates of: (a) 65% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices of the common stock during the 10 trading day period prior to conversion for the St George Note; (b) at the lesser of $0.07 per share or 70% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days prior to the conversion for the JMJ Note and c) at 51% of the average of the two lowest bid prices in the 10 trading days prior to the conversion for the LG Capital Note.

The Company has identified the embedded derivatives related to these convertible notes. These embedded derivatives included certain conversion features and reset provisions, requiring the Company to record the fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of these convertible notes, and to fair value as of each subsequent reporting date.

At the inception of these convertible notes, the Company determined the aggregate fair value of $467,725 of embedded derivatives. The fair values of the embedded derivatives were determined using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions:

18

(1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 151% to 266%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.08 % to 0.19%, (4) expected life of 0.08 to 0.99 year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.065 to $0.125 per share.

The determined fair value of these debt derivatives of $467,725 at inception dates were charged as a debt discount up to the net proceeds of the convertible note with the remainder $115,000 and $110,598 charged to the operations during 2012 and 2013, respectively, as non-cash interest expense.

At December 31, 2012, the Company marked to market the fair values of these debt derivatives and determined a fair value of $916,646. The Company recorded a loss from change in fair value of debt derivatives of $616,519. The fair values of the embedded derivatives were determined using Black Scholes Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 185% to 216%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.12% to 0.15%, (4) expected life of 0.00 to 0.64 year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.035 to $0.041 per share.

At September 30, 2013, the Company marked to market the fair values of these debt derivatives and determined a fair value of $643,988. The Company recorded a gain from change in fair value of debt derivatives of $426,756 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The fair values of the embedded derivatives were determined using Black Scholes Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 259.58% (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 0.04% to 0.10%, (4) expected life of 0.47 to 1.00 year, and (5) estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock of $0.0195 per share.

NOTE 9– STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,267,500 shares of common stock in settlement of a related party obligations of $89,642. In connection with the settlement, the Company recorded a loss on settlement of related party debt of $190,670.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 6,580,000 shares of common stock for cash.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 5,267,500 shares of common stock in settlement of obligation due related party.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 80,000 shares of common stock in settlement of $2,576 notes payable due to JMJ.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock in settlement of $4,000 notes payable due to LG Capital

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock in settlement dispute regarding domain name purchase.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 15,000,000 shares of its common stock in settlement of $700,000 of outstanding stock based payable.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares as collateral in connection with issuance of the LG Capital note as described in Note 7 above.

19

NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in numerous lawsuits. The costs that may result from these lawsuits are only accrued for when it is more likely than not that a liability, resulting from past events, will be incurred and the amount of that liability can be quantified or estimated within a reasonable range.

DataJack, Inc. is a defendant in litigation titled St George Investments LLC v. Quamtel, Inc. (subsequently renamed DataJack, Inc.) and Transfer Online, Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-09186, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the “St George Litigation”). The St. George Litigation was commenced on November 15, 2012, and amended on January 29, 2013. Generally, the Amended Complaint alleges that DataJack failed to pay a purported debt to Plaintiff as and when due and that DataJack and its transfer agent failed to honor a notice from the Plaintiff to exercise its claimed contractual right to convert $20,000 of the alleged debt to shares of stock in DataJack. The Amended Complaint alleges that DataJack is indebted to the Plaintiff in the amount of $391,704, plus penalties, interest, attorney’s fees and costs. The Amended Complaint also seeks injunctive relief and unspecified amounts of compensatory, consequential, indirect and punitive damages. DataJack has disputed its alleged liability to the Plaintiff. On May 7, 2013, DataJack, together with its transfer agent, filed a motion to dismiss Counts II, III, and V, and strike portions of Counts I and IV, of the Amended Complaint. Briefing on the motion to dismiss is due was completed on June 30, 2013, and rulings are expected within few months thereafter.

The Company is a defendant in an action styled Robert Picow vs. Quamtel, Inc. (subsequently renamed DataJack, Inc.) and Steven Ivester, in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. Picow asserts he is entitled to unspecified damages as a consequence of an alleged breach of a consulting agreement and for an alleged interference with his ability to trade his Quamtel shares. The Company believes the claims to be without merit and will aggressively defend same. The case is now in discovery, and settlement negotiations are underway.

The Company is a defendant in an action styled The Balancing Act TV, LLC vs. Quamtel, Inc. (subsequently renamed DataJack, Inc.), filed on July 24, 2012 in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The Balancing Act TV, LLC asserts that it is entitled to damages in the amount of approximately $50,000 as a consequence of an alleged breach by us of a contract with us. We believe the claims to be without merit and have moved to dismiss this matter. We will aggressively defend the Company against these claims.

The ultimate outcome of these lawsuits cannot determined as of the filing date of this report. However, management believes that the outcome of the above litigation will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In October 2013, the Company issued a promissory note for $125,000 payable in 11 monthly installments of $10,000 including interest with a balloon payment of $26,440 due October 25, 2014.

20

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company that involve risks and uncertainties. Certain statements included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements related to anticipated cash flow sources and uses, and words including but not limited to “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “expects”, “future” and similar statements or expressions, identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements herein are subject to certain risks and uncertainties in the Company’s business, including but not limited to, reliance on key customers and competition in its markets, market demand, product performance, technological developments, maintenance of relationships with key suppliers, difficulties of hiring or retaining key personnel and any changes in current accounting rules, all of which may be beyond the control of the Company. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the ("SEC") on April 16, 2013.

When used in this quarterly report, the terms the “Company,” “DataJack,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refers to DataJack, Inc. formerly known as Quamtel, Inc., a Nevada corporation. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein. Further, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on April 16, 2013.

Overview

We were incorporated in 1999 under the laws of Nevada as a communications company offering, through our subsidiaries, a comprehensive range of mobile broadband and communications products and services that are designed to meet the needs of individual consumers, businesses, government subscribers and resellers. Our operations are organized to meet the needs of our targeted subscriber groups through focused communications solutions that incorporate the capabilities of our mobile broadband and communications services.

We offer secure nationwide mobile broadband wireless data transmission services primarily under the DataJack brand. Through DataJack, we offer low cost, no contract, mobile broadband with various data plans. Our DataJack service is offered primarily through two devices - the DataJack MiFi Mobile Hotspot that can connect up to 5 Wi-Fi enabled devices and the DataJack USB, a Plug and Play USB Device.

Our communication products include an international calling service delivered under the brand WQN, through our subsidiary, WQN, Inc. (“WQN”). Our prepaid international calling service, “EasyTalk,” focuses on convenient features and the delivery of low cost international calls to consumers and businesses. WQN global network offers customers secure, instant activation and immediate access to the service while eliminating the need to use a PIN or switch long distance carriers. Other features include 24 hour online and over the phone recharge, speed dial, PIN- less dialing and online access to account balance, call history and purchase history. EasyTalk can be accessed using your mobile, home or business phone from anywhere in the United States or Canada and can be used to place calls to over 196 countries globally.

21

Effective June 5, 2013, we sold certain intangible and other assets of WQN to iTalk, Inc., a Nevada corporation. The assets included in the sale were certain personal property, switching equipment, computer and related peripherals, software licenses, service contracts including trade names and trademarks. and all rights and interests to and in all of the customers of the International Long Distance division of DataJack, Inc., including but without limitation all the customers and/or subscribers of VoIP, ITG, EasyTalk and Valucom .The purchase price of $300,000. The WQN tangible and intangible assets sold had no remaining net book value at September 30, 2013.

Results of Operations for the Three Months ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Same Period in 2012

Revenues

Our revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $330,882 and $629,481, respectively. Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 decreased over the same period in 2012 by 47% due to a decrease in calling card PIN revenue in the current quarter over the same quarter last year and loss of revenue due to the sale of certain domain names. We have been directing more marketing resources into growing the DataJack business. The calling card PIN revenue decreased due to increased competition and the Company’s focus on growing the DataJack business. We plan to increase marketing resources to WQN to stabilize our calling card PIN revenues.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit

Cost of sales totaled $184,367 and $481,995 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This resulted in gross profit of $146,515 (44%) and $147,486 (23%) for the respective 2013 and 2012 periods. Gross profit has improved in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to reduction in our mix that the WQN calling card division services.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $698,447 and $716,865 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Compensation and consulting expenses decreased to $335,122 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $512,821 for the same period in 2012. Compensation and consulting expenses are primarily a result of the issuance of common shares for consulting services. During 2012, the Company reduced the number of consultants under contract, which in turn reduced compensation expense.

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $334,847 and $173,314 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase primarily attributable to an increase in service providers as compared to 2012.

Other Income and Expense

Other income and expenses increased to a net income of $6,217 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a net other loss of $330,770 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The $336,987 decrease is directly attributable to the loss on penalty on convertible note of $174,014 in 2012, net with gain in change in fair value of derivative liability of $86,442 as compared to $113,363 in 2012, net with a decrease in interest and finance expenses of $11,750 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 to $25,629 for the current period. In the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company amortized $80,423 of debt discount as compared to $311,190 for the same period, last year.

22

Net Loss

As a result of above, our loss for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $545,715 as compared to a loss of $900,149 for the same period last year.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Same Period in 2012

Revenues

Our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $1,408,292 and $1,889,802, respectively. Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 decreased over the same period in 2012 by 25% due to a decrease in calling card PIN revenue in the current period over the same period last year and loss of revenue due to the sale of certain domain names. We have been directing more marketing resources into growing the DataJack business. The calling card PIN revenue decreased due to increased competition and the Company’s focus on growing the DataJack business. We plan to increase marketing resources to WQN to stabilize our calling card PIN revenues.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit

Cost of sales totaled $1,027,926 and $1,495,275 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This resulted in gross profit of $380,366 (37%) and $394,527 (21%) for the respective 2013 and 2012 periods. Gross profit has improved in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to reduction in our mix that the WQN calling card division services.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were $1,918,611 and $4,424,703 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Compensation and consulting expenses decreased to $1,097,399 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $3,345,051 for the same period in 2012. Compensation and consulting expenses are primarily a result of the issuance of common shares for consulting services. During 2012, the Company reduced the number of consultants under contract, which in turn reduced compensation expense.

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $748,316 and $971,282 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease primarily attributable to a decrease in service provider costs in 2012 as compared to the same period, current period.

Other Income and Expense

Other income and expenses increased to a net other income of $102,689 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a net other loss of $524,773 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The $627,462 increase is directly attributable to the gain from sale of assets of $457,109 in the current period and gain in change in fair value of derivative liability of $426,756 and net loss on settlement debts of $154,422 as compared to nil for the same period last year, net with an increase in interest and finance expenses of $326,432 from $62,965 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $389,397 for the current period. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company amortized $237,357 of debt discount as compared to $553,978 for the same period, last year.

23

Net Loss

A decrease in compensation and consulting expenses, gain on sale of domain name; off-set by increased financing expenses resulted in a net loss of $1,435,556 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to a net loss of $4,554,949 for the same period in 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents were $18,499 at September 30, 2013. Our net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $858,496, due primarily to our net loss during this period.

Cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was comprised of a $221,589 received for the sale of our of the intangible assets of ITG, Inc. to iTalk and other assets, net with equipment purchases of $2,499.

Our primary sources of funding for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 have been (I) gross proceeds of $153,280 from the sale of our common stock to accredited investors, (ii) gross proceeds in the amount of $545,373 from the issuance of notes, net of (iii) repayments of notes of $64,634.

At September 30, 2013, restricted cash consisted of a $150,000 security deposit in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit held in escrow related to our performance under a service contract with one of our telecommunication service providers.

Our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate our continuation as a going concern. We have incurred operating losses and negative cash flows from operations during the past two years, have incurred an accumulated deficit of $24,632,233 through September 30, 2013, and have been dependent on issuances of debt and equity instruments to fund our operations. The Company believes that anticipated revenues from operations will continue to be insufficient to satisfy its ongoing capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. Therefore, our ability to meet our obligations and continue to operate as a going concern is highly dependent on our ability to obtain new loans or equity.

The Company cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. The Company may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, the Company may be unable to implement its current plans for expansion, repay its debt obligations as they become due, or respond to competitive pressures, any of which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties

Accordingly, our prior independent auditors added an explanatory paragraph to their opinion on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, based on substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Capital Expenditure Commitments

We did not have any substantial outstanding commitments to purchase capital equipment at September 30, 2013.

24

Capital Needs

We do not currently have sufficient capital resources to meet projected cash flow requirements. We will need to continue to raise capital through the issuance of new shares or by issuing new debt securities. However, any failure in generating sufficient liquidity from operations or in raising sufficient capital resources, on terms acceptable to us, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Our future cash requirements include those associated with maintaining our status as a reporting entity. We believe that on an annual basis those costs would not exceed an average of $25,000 per month.

We presently do not have sufficient available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. Due to our limited operating history and lack of substantial historical operating profits, our operations have not been a source of liquidity. We will need to obtain additional capital in order to fund our operations and become profitable. In order to obtain capital, we may need to sell additional shares of our common stock or borrow funds from private lenders. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining additional funding in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows the guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements. SAB 104 states that revenue is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenues are primarily derived from fees charged to terminate voice services over the Company’s network and from related monthly recurring charges. Variable revenue is earned based on the number of minutes during a call and is recognized upon completion of a call. Revenue from each customer is calculated from information received through the Company’s network switches. The Company tracks the information received from the switch and analyzes the call detail records and applies the respective revenue rate for each call. Fixed revenue is earned from monthly recurring services provided to customers that are fixed and recurring in nature, and are connected for a specified period of time. Revenues are recognized as the services are provided and continue until the expiration of the contract or until cancellation of the service by the customer. Cash fees received prior to call completion are recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as unearned revenue.

Derivative Instrument Liability

The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other financial instruments or contracts and requires recognition of all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of hedging relationship designation. Accounting for changes in fair value of the derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships and the types of relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any derivative instruments that were designated as hedges.

25

ITEM 3. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, as of September 30, 2013, our management conducted an evaluation with the participation of our President who also serves as our principal financial and accounting officer (the “Certifying Officer”) regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act).

A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis.

Based on this evaluation, our Certifying Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of September 30, 2013. Our President, who is our sole executive officer, is not a financial or accounting professional, and we do not have a chief financial officer or sufficient accounting staff. Until we are able to engage a qualified financial officer, and/or accounting staff, we may continue to experience material weaknesses in our disclosure controls that may adversely affect our ability to timely file our quarterly and annual reports.

Our management, including the Certifying Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all improper conduct. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, a design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of improper conduct, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments and decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons, or by management override of the control. Further, the design of any system of controls is also based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations and a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

The Company has an insufficient quantity of dedicated resources and experienced personnel involved in reviewing and designing internal controls. As a result, a material misstatement of the interim and annual consolidated financial statements could occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We have not achieved the optimal level of segregation of duties relative to key financial reporting functions and we do not have an audit committee or an independent audit committee financial expert. While not being legally obligated to has an audit committee or independent audit committee financial expert, it is management’s view that an audit committee, comprised of independent board members, and an independent financial expert is an important entity-level control over the Company's financial statements. We have not achieved an optimal segregation of duties for executive officers of the Company.

26

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently aware of and a party to the following legal proceedings or claims that we believe will not have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results:

DataJack, Inc. is a defendant in litigation titled St George Investments LLC v. Quamtel, Inc. (subsequently renamed DataJack, Inc.) and Transfer Online, Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-09186, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the “St George Litigation”). The St. George Litigation was commenced on November 15, 2012, and amended on January 29, 2013. Generally, the Amended Complaint alleges that DataJack failed to pay a purported debt to Plaintiff as and when due and that DataJack and its transfer agent failed to honor a notice from the Plaintiff to exercise its claimed contractual right to convert $20,000 of the alleged debt to shares of stock in DataJack. The Amended Complaint alleges that DataJack is indebted to the Plaintiff in the amount of $391,704, plus penalties, interest, attorney’s fees and costs. The Amended Complaint also seeks injunctive relief and unspecified amounts of compensatory, consequential, indirect and punitive damages. DataJack has disputed its alleged liability to the Plaintiff. On May 7, 2013, DataJack, together with its transfer agent, filed a motion to dismiss Counts II, III, and V, and strike portions of Counts I and IV, of the Amended Complaint. Briefing on the motion to dismiss is due was completed by June 30, 2013, and rulings are expected within few months thereafter.

The Company is a defendant in an action styled Robert Picow vs. Quamtel, Inc. (subsequently renamed DataJack, Inc.) and Steven Ivester, in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. Picow asserts he is entitled to unspecified damages as a consequence of an alleged breach of a consulting agreement and for an alleged interference with his ability to trade his Quamtel shares. The Company believes the claims to be without merit and will aggressively defend same. The case is now in discovery, and settlement negotiations are underway.

The Company is a defendant in an action styled The Balancing Act TV, LLC vs. Quamtel, Inc. (subsequently renamed DataJack, Inc.), filed on July 24, 2012 in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The Balancing Act TV, LLC asserts that it is entitled to damages in the amount of approximately $50,000 as a consequence of an alleged breach by us of a contract with us. We believe the claims to be without merit and have moved to dismiss this matter. We will aggressively defend the Company against these claims.

The ultimate outcome of these lawsuits cannot determined as of the filing date of this report. However, management believes that the outcome of the above litigation will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

See the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2013.

27

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the nine months of 2013, the Company issued 38,427,500 shares of common stock valued at $1,202,467 as follows:

• 6,580,000 shares were issued and sold to accredited investors for net proceeds of $119,100;
• 580,000 shares valued at $20,075 were issued to debt holders in settlement of debt;
• 5,267,500 shares valued at $280,312 were issued to reduce related party balances of $89,642;
• 15,000,000 shares valued at $700,000 were issued to reduce related party stock based payable;
• 10,000,000 shares were issued to be held as collateral towards a convertible note payable issued in the current period;
• 1,000,000 shares were issued in settlement of a previous domain name purchase.

These securities were offered and sold pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the federal securities laws provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

__________________________________
* Filed herewith.

** This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

*** The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

28

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

29