1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RADNOR HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. SKADDEN ARPS MEAGER & FLOM LLP
 

RADNOR HOLDINGS CORPORATION v. SKADDEN ARPS MEAGER & FLOM LLP

Case No. 06-10894(PJW) (Jointly Administered), Adv. No. 12-51308(PJW).

RADNOR HOLDINGS CORPORATION, MICHAEL T. KENNEDY, MTK TRUST FBO RYAN KENNEDY, MTK TRUST FBO SEAN M. KENNEDY, MTK TRUST FBO MICHAELA C. KENNEDY, MTK TRUST FBO CONOR R. KENNEDY, Chapter 11, Plaintiffs, v. SKADDEN ARPS MEAGER & FLOM LLP; SK PRIVATE INVESTMENT FUND 1998 LLC; RICHARD T. PRINS, ESQUIRE; GREGG M. GALARDI, ESQUIRE; TENNENBAUM & CO LLC; TENNENBAUM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC; BABSON & CO. LLC; SPECIAL VALUE EXPANSION FUND, LLC; SPECIAL VALUE OPPORTUNITIES FUND, LLC; MICHAEL E. TENNENBAUM; SUZANNE S. TENNENBAUM; DAVID A. HOLLANDER; MARK K. HOLDSWORTH; HOWARD M. LEVKOWITZ; RICHARD E. SPENCER; JOSE FELICIANO; ALVAREZ & MARSAL, INC. and STANFORD M. SPRINGEL, Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

October 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael T. Kennedy , Radnor, PA, On Behalf of Plaintiffs, Michael T. Kennedy, Radnor Holdings Corporation, et al. And the Kennedy Family Trusts for the benefit of the Kennedy Children.

David B. Stratton , James G. McMillan, III , PEPPER HAMILTON LLP, Wilmington, DE, Counsel for the Skadden Defendants.

Laura Davis Jones , Michael R. Seidl , Peter J. Keane , PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP, Wilmington, DE, Counsel to Alvarez & Marsal, LLC and Stanley Springel.

Russell C. Silberglied , Cory D. Kandestin , RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington, DE, Counsel to Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC, Tennenbaum & Co., LLC, Special Value Expansion Fund, LLC, Special Value Opportunities Fund, LLC, Michael E. Tennenbaum, Suzanne S. Tennenbaum, David A. Hollander, Mark K. Holdsworth, and Howard M. Levkowitz.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PETER J. WALSH, Bankruptcy Judge.

This opinion is with regard to Plaintiffs' Motion, Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(3) and Del. Bankr. L.R. 5011-1, For the Entry of an Order Determining that Causes of Actions Under the Adversary Proceeding are Non-Core. (Doc. # 55.) For the reasons described below, the Court finds that causes of action in this adversary proceeding include core proceedings.

Background

The Complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases