JENSEN v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Civil No. 09-1775 (DWF/BRT).

James and Lorie Jensen, as parents, guardians, and next friends of Bradley J. Jensen; James Brinker and Darren Allen, as parents, guardians, and next friends of Thomas M. Allbrink; Elizabeth Jacobs, as parent, guardian, and next friend of Jason R. Jacobs; and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota; Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota; Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota; Douglas Bratvold, individually and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota; Scott TenNapel, individually and as Clinical Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota; and the State of Minnesota, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

May 6, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Azman, Esq. , and Shamus P. O'Meara, Esq. , O'Meara Leer Wagner & Kohl, PA, counsel for Plaintiffs.

Nathan A. Brennaman , Scott H. Ikeda , Anthony R. Noss , and Aaron Winter , Assistant Attorneys General, Minnesota Attorney General's Office, counsel for State Defendants.

Samuel D. Orbovich, Esq. , and Christopher A. Stafford, Esq. , Fredrikson & Byron, PA, counsel for Defendant Scott TenNapel.


ORDER

INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is the State of Minnesota's March 20, 2015 proposed modifications to Minnesota's Olmstead Plan ("Proposed Olmstead Plan"). (Doc. No. 401-1.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court declines to approve the Proposed Olmstead Plan as it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases