Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 0 - 20957

SUN BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(856) 691-7700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value – 87,076,823 Shares Outstanding at May 5, 2014

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Dollars in thousands, except par value amounts)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Table of Contents

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

Table of Contents

SUN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(All dollar amounts presented in the tables, except share and per share amounts, are in thousands)

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q, and therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

All normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been included. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2013. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014 or any other period. The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. The significant estimates include the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment on investment securities, goodwill, intangible assets, income taxes, stock-based compensation and the fair value of financial instruments. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Prior Period Revision. Previously, the Company presented restricted cash, with respect to amounts held as collateral against letters of credit, in “Cash and due from banks” on the consolidated statements of financial condition. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company identified that certain of these balances should be classified as restricted cash. The table below reports the impact of these revisions to the consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013:

Basis of Consolidation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include, after all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated, the accounts of the Company, its principal wholly-owned subsidiary, Sun National Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sun Financial Services, L.L.C., 2020 Properties, L.L.C., and 4040 Properties, L.L.C. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 810-10, Consolidation, Sun Capital Trust V, Sun Capital Trust VI, Sun Capital Trust VII, Sun Statutory Trust VII, and Sun Capital Trust VIII, collectively, the “Issuing Trusts”, are presented on a deconsolidated basis.

Segment Information. As defined in accordance with FASB ASC 280, Segment Reporting, the Company has one reportable and operating segment, “Community Banking.” All of the Company’s activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent and assessed based on how each of the activities of the Company supports the others. For example, lending is dependent upon the ability of the Company to fund itself with deposits and other borrowings and manage interest rate and credit risk. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of the Company as one segment or unit.

Loans Held-For-Sale. Loans held-for-sale totaled $16.0 million and $20.7 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The balance at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 includes $9.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans originated for the portfolio which have subsequently been transferred to held-for-sale and recorded at fair value. The remaining balance at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 included residential mortgages originated with the intent to sell which were recorded at fair value.

8

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is determined by management based upon past experience, evaluation of estimated loss and impairment in the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other pertinent factors. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to provide for estimated losses and impairment based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risk in the loan portfolio. Loan impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of collateral. While management uses the best information available to make such evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations.

The provision for loan losses is based upon historical loan loss experience, a series of qualitative factors and an evaluation of estimated losses in the current loan portfolio, including the evaluation of impaired loans under FASB ASC 310, Receivables (“FASB ASC 310”). Values assigned to the qualitative factors and those developed from historic loss experience provide a dynamic basis for the calculation of reserve factors for both pass-rated loans (general pooled allowance) and those criticized and classified loans that continue to perform. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired. For this purpose, delays of less than 90 days are considered to be insignificant. Impairment losses are included in the provision for loan losses. Loans not individually reviewed are evaluated as a group using reserve factor percentages based on historic loss experience and qualitative factors. Included in these qualitative factors are:

Commercial loans, including commercial real estate loans, are placed on non-accrual status at the time the loan has been delinquent for 90 days unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Generally, commercial loans and commercial real estate loans are charged-off no later than 180 days after becoming delinquent unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection, or other extenuating circumstances support collection. Residential real estate loans are typically placed on non-accrual status at the time the loan has been delinquent for 90 days. Other consumer loans are typically charged-off at 180 days delinquent. In all cases, loans must be placed on non-accrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Goodwill is the excess of the fair value of liabilities assumed over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of December 31, unless circumstances indicate that a test is required at an earlier date. The Company elected to not apply the qualitative evaluation option permitted under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-8, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 35): Testing Goodwill for Impairment issued in September 2011. Therefore, the Company utilizes the two-step goodwill impairment test outlined in FASB ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“FASB ASC 350”). Step one, which is used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. A reporting unit is an operating segment, or one level below an operating segment, as defined in FASB ASC 280. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and step two is therefore unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. At December 31, 2013, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test, and step one of the analysis indicated that the Company’s fair value was greater than its carrying value; therefore, the Company’s goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2013. Nothing has occurred since that time to suggest that an impairment exists at March 31, 2014. The carrying amount of goodwill totaled $38.2 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

9

Table of Contents

Intangible assets, net on the consolidated statements of financial condition, consist of core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization from the Bank’s previous acquisitions. Core deposit intangibles are amortized using the straight-line method based on the characteristics of the particular deposit type and are evaluated annually for impairment.

Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”). The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain key employees. These policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized in accordance with FASB ASC 325-30, Investments in Insurance Contracts. At March 31, 2014, the Company had $26.4 million invested in a general account and $51.3 million in a separate account, for a total BOLI cash surrender value of $77.7 million. The BOLI separate account is invested in a mortgage-backed securities fund, which is managed by an independent investment firm. Pricing volatility of these underlying instruments may have an impact on investment income; however, the fluctuations would be partially mitigated by a stable value wrap agreement which is a component of the separate account. Income from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in BOLI income of the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (“FASB ASC 740”). FASB ASC 740 requires the recording of deferred income taxes that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Management exercises significant judgment in the evaluation of the amount and timing of the recognition of the resulting tax assets and liabilities. The judgments and estimates required for the evaluation are updated based upon changes in business factors and the tax laws. If actual results differ from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating the amount and timing of tax recognized, there can be no assurance that additional expenses will not be required in future periods. The Company recognizes, when applicable, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Assessment of uncertain tax positions under FASB ASC 740 requires careful consideration of the technical merits of a position based on management’s analysis of tax regulations and interpretations. Significant judgment is applied when addressing the requirements of FASB ASC 740. At March 31, 2014, the Company had a valuation allowance of $119.6 million against its gross deferred tax asset. As the Company remained in a cumulative loss position, the deferred tax valuation allowance is still appropriate at March 31, 2014. The net deferred tax asset of $682 thousand in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at March 31, 2014 represents the tax benefit from unrealized losses on investment securities available-for-sale. The Company intends to hold these securities until maturity or until such time that they are in an unrealized gain position and therefore, the deferred tax asset is considered appropriate.

Mortgage Banking Revenue, Net. Mortgage banking revenue, net includes revenues associated with the sale of residential mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell, net of recourse liability provision as well as gain on bulk sales of jumbo residential mortgage loans. The components of this line item are as follows:

10

Table of Contents

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The Company classifies items of accumulated comprehensive income by their nature and displays the details of other comprehensive income in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Amounts categorized as comprehensive loss/income represent net unrealized gains or losses on investment securities available for sale, net of tax and the non-credit portion of any other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) loss not recorded in earnings. Reclassifications are made to avoid double counting items which are displayed as part of net income (loss) for the period. These reclassifications for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Recent Accounting Principles.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-4, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The amendments in this update clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of foreclosure or the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. For public entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on its financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The amendments in this update seek to eliminate the diversity in practice in the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists by presenting the unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of the unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset. To the extent that a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward are not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on its financial statements and determined that there currently is no impact on the Company’s presentation.

(2) Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to employees, and when appropriate, non-employees, in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, (“FASB ASC 718”). Under the fair value provisions of FASB ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and it is recognized as expense over the appropriate vesting period using the straight-line method. However, consistent with FASB ASC 718, the amount of stock-based compensation cost recognized at any date must at least equal the portion of the grant date value of the award that is vested at that date and, as a result, it may be necessary to recognize the expense using a ratable method. Although the provisions of FASB ASC 718 should generally be applied to non-employees, FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, is used in determining the measurement date of the compensation expense for non-employees.

Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at measurement date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of the stock options and the expected volatility of the Company’s stock. In addition, judgment is required in estimating the amount of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates or different key assumptions were used, it could have a material effect on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

11

Table of Contents

The Company’s stock-based incentive plans authorize the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to awards that may be granted in the form of stock options to purchase common stock (“Options”) and awards of shares of common stock (“Stock Awards”). The purpose of the Company’s stock-based incentive plans is to attract and retain personnel for positions of substantial responsibility and to provide additional incentive to certain officers, directors, advisory directors, employees and other persons to promote the success of the Company. Under the Company’s stock-based incentive plans, Options generally expire ten years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the Option’s terms. A committee of non-employee directors has the authority to determine the conditions upon which the Options granted will vest. Options are granted at the then fair market value of the Company’s stock. All or a portion of any Stock Awards earned as compensation by a director may be deferred under the Company’s Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan.

Activity in the stock option plans for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 was as follows:

Summary of Options Activity

The weighted average remaining contractual term was approximately 6.6 years for Options outstanding and 5.4 years for Options exercisable as of March 31, 2014.

At March 31, 2014, the aggregate intrinsic value was $48 thousand for Options outstanding and $15 thousand for Options exercisable.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company granted 216,245 Options and 83,610 Options, respectively. In accordance with FASB ASC 718, the fair value of the Options granted are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which uses the assumptions in the table below. The expected term of an Option is estimated using historical exercise behavior of employees at a particular level of management who were granted Options with a comparable term. The Options have historically been granted with a 10 year term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price.

12

Table of Contents

Significant weighted average assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the Options for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

A summary of the Company’s nonvested Stock Award activity during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 are presented in the following tables:

Summary of Nonvested Stock Award Activity

There were 91,115 shares of nonvested Stock Awards issued during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and no nonvested Stock Awards issued during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The value of these shares is based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period for all of the nonvested Stock Awards issued.

Total compensation expense recognized related to Options and nonvested Stock Awards, including that for non-employee directors, during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $130 thousand and $238 thousand, respectively. As of March 31, 2014, there was approximately $498 thousand and $1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to Options and nonvested Stock Awards, respectively, granted by the Company. The cost of the Options and Stock Awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.0 years and 2.7 years, respectively.

13

Table of Contents

(3) Investment Securities

The amortized cost of investment securities and the approximate fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:

The following table provides the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

Gross Unrealized Losses by Investment Category

14

Table of Contents

The Company determines whether unrealized losses are temporary in accordance with FASB ASC 325-40, Investments – Other, when applicable, and FASB ASC 320-10, Investments – Overall, (“FASB ASC 320-10”). The evaluation is based upon factors such as the creditworthiness of the underlying borrowers, performance of the underlying collateral, if applicable, and the level of credit support in the security structure. Management also evaluates other factors and circumstances that may be indicative of an OTTI condition. These include, but are not limited to, an evaluation of the type of security, length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost and near-term prospects of the issuer.

FASB ASC 320-10 requires the Company to assess if an OTTI exists by considering whether the Company has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery. If either of these situations applies, the guidance requires the Company to record an OTTI charge to earnings for the difference between the amortized cost basis of the security and the fair value of the security. If neither of these situations applies, the Company is required to assess whether it is expected to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If the Company is not expected to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, the guidance requires the Company to bifurcate the identified OTTI into a credit loss component and a component representing loss related to other factors. A discount rate is applied which equals the effective yield of the security. The difference between the present value of the expected cash flows and the amortized book value is considered a credit loss. When a market price is not readily available, the market value of the security is determined using the same expected cash flows; the discount rate is a rate the Company determines from open market and other sources as appropriate for the security. The difference between the market value and the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Application of this guidance resulted in no OTTI charges during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

The following is a roll-forward for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 of OTTI charges recognized in earnings as a result of credit losses on investments:

On December 10, 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued final rules to implement the Volcker Rule contained in section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, generally to become effective on July 21, 2015. The Volcker Rule prohibits an insured depository institution and its affiliates (referred to as “banking entities”) from: (i) engaging in “proprietary trading” and (ii) investing in or sponsoring certain types of funds (“covered funds”) subject to certain limited exceptions. These prohibitions impact the ability of U.S. banking entities to provide investment management products and services that are competitive with nonbanking firms generally and with non-U.S. banking organizations in overseas markets. The rule also effectively prohibits short-term trading strategies by any U.S. banking entity if those strategies involve instruments other than those specifically permitted for trading.

The final Volcker Rule regulations do provide certain exemptions allowing banking entities to continue underwriting, market-making and hedging activities and trading certain government obligations, as well as various exemptions and exclusions from the definition of “covered funds.” However, the level of required compliance activity depends on the size of the banking entity and the extent of its trading.

On January 14, 2014, the five federal agencies approved an interim final rule to permit banking entities to retain interests in certain collateralized debt obligations backed primarily by trust preferred securities from the investment prohibitions of the Volcker Rule. Under the interim final rule, the agencies permit the retention of an interest in or sponsorship of covered funds by banking entities if certain qualifications are met. In addition, the agencies released a non-exclusive list of issuers that meet the requirements of the interim final rule. On April 17, 2014 the FRB released guidance stating that it would extend the conformance period for banks holding collateralized loan obligations by two years to July 2017.

U.S. Government Agency Securities. At March 31, 2014, the gross unrealized loss in the category of 12 months or longer of $374 thousand consisted of one agency security with an estimated fair value of $4.6 million issued and guaranteed by a U.S. Government sponsored agency. The Company monitors certain factors such as market rates and possible credit deterioration to determine if an OTTI exists. As of March 31, 2014, management concluded that an OTTI did not exist on the aforementioned security based upon its assessment. Management also concluded that it does not intend to sell the security, and that it is not more likely than not it will be required to sell the security, before its recovery, which may be maturity, and management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of this security.

15

Table of Contents

U.S. Government Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities. At March 31, 2014, the gross unrealized loss in the category of less than 12 months of $1.2 million consisted of 19 mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $129.8 million, the gross unrealized loss in the category of 12 months or longer of $578 thousand consisted of two mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $8.1 million issued and guaranteed by a U.S. Government sponsored agency. The Company monitors certain factors such as market rates and possible credit deterioration to determine if an OTTI exists. As of March 31, 2014, management concluded that an OTTI did not exist on any of the aforementioned securities based upon its assessment. Management also concluded that it does not intend nor will it be required to sell the securities, before their recovery, which may be maturity, and management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

Collateralized Loan Obligation Securities. At March 31, 2014, the gross unrealized loss in the category of less than 12 months of $566 thousand consisted of six AAA and six AA rated collateralized loan obligation securities with an estimated fair value of $69.3 million. The Company monitors key credit metrics such as delinquencies, defaults, cumulative losses and credit support levels to determine if an OTTI exists. As of March 31, 2014, management concluded that an OTTI did not exist on any of the aforementioned securities based upon its assessment. Management also concluded that it does not intend nor will it be required to sell the securities, before their recovery, which may be maturity, and management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

At March 31, 2014, the Company had 13 collateralized loan obligation securities with an amortized cost of $79.9 million and an estimated fair value of $79.3 million. These securities are subject to the provisions of the Volcker Rule. However, a final determination has yet to be made whether banks will be required to divest these investments. Discussion has been ongoing among the regulators, Congress and the investors in the collateralized loan obligations. Based on the current status of these discussions and through the Company’s communication with its investment advisors, the Company believes it will either be able to hold these collateralized loan obligation investments in its portfolio or have them modified such that the perceived risk will be adequately eliminated.

Trust Preferred Securities. At March 31, 2014, the gross unrealized loss in the category of 12 months or longer of $4.0 million consisted of two trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities are comprised of one non-rated single issuer security with an amortized cost of $3.8 million and an estimated fair value of $2.7 million, and one non-investment grade rated pooled security with an amortized cost of $8.8 million and an estimated fair value of $5.9 million.

For the pooled security, the Company monitors each issuer in the collateral pool with respect to financial performance using data from the issuer’s most recent regulatory reports as well as information on issuer deferrals and defaults. Also, the security structure is monitored with respect to collateral coverage and current levels of subordination. Expected future cash flows are projected assuming additional defaults and deferrals based on the performance of the collateral pool. The non-investment grade pooled security is in a senior position in the capital structure. The security had a 2.9 times principal coverage. As of the most recent reporting date, interest has been paid in accordance with the terms of the security. The Company reviews projected cash flow analysis for adverse changes in the present value of projected future cash flows that may result in an other-than-temporary credit impairment to be recognized through earnings. The most recent valuations assumed no recovery on any defaulted collateral, no recovery on any deferring collateral and an additional 3.6% of defaults or deferrals’ every three years with no recovery rate. As of March 31, 2014, management concluded that an OTTI did not exist on the aforementioned security based upon its assessment. Management also concluded that it does not intend to sell the security, and that it is not more likely than not it will be required to sell the security, before its recovery, which may be maturity, and management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of this security.

The financial performance of the non-rated single issuer trust preferred security is monitored on a quarterly basis using data from the issuer’s most recent regulatory reports to assess the probability of cash flow impairment. Expected future cash flows are projected by incorporating the contractual cash flow of the security adjusted, if necessary, for potential changes in the amount or timing of cash flows due to the underlying creditworthiness of the issuer and covenants in the security.

In August 2009, the issuer of the non-rated single issuer trust preferred security elected to defer its normal quarterly dividend payment. As contractually permitted, the issuer may defer dividend payments up to five years with accumulated dividends, and interest on those deferred dividends, payable upon the resumption of its scheduled dividend payments. The issuer is currently operating under an agreement with its regulators. The agreement stipulates that the issuer must receive permission from its regulators prior to resuming its scheduled dividend payments. The contractual deferred period for the issuer ends on September 1, 2014.

The pooled security was included in the non-exclusive list of issuers that meet the requirements of the interim final rule release by the agencies and therefore will not be required to be sold by the Company. The single issuer security is not subject to the provisions of the Volcker rule.

16

Table of Contents

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company did not record an OTTI credit-related charge related to this deferring single issuer trust preferred security. Based on the Company’s most recent evaluation, the Company does not expect the issuer to default on the security based primarily on the issuer’s subsidiary bank reporting that it meets the minimum regulatory requirements to be considered a “well capitalized” institution. The Company recognizes that the length of time the issuer has been in deferral, the difficult economic environment and some weakened performance measures, while recently improving, increased the probability that a full recovery of principal and anticipated dividends may not be realized. The cumulative OTTI on this security as of March 31, 2014 was $1.2 million. Based upon the current capital position of the issuer and recent improvements in the financial performance of the issuer, the Company concluded that an additional impairment charge was not warranted at March 31, 2014.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the investment securities, by contractual maturity, at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are shown below. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.