1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 943 F.Supp.2d
  5. 943 F.Supp.2d 83 (2013)
 

BURMEISTER v. PENSION BEN. GUAR. CORP.

Civil Action No. 12-973(RMC).

943 F.Supp.2d 83 (2013)

Franklin J. BURMEISTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 6, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joan Torzewski , Harris Reny Torzewski, LPA, Toledo, OH, Wendy Lee Kahn , Zwerding, Paul, Kahn & Wolly, PC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Kimberly J. Duplechain , Nicole Hagan , Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

What happens when a union and employer agree to change the employee pension plan but the plan never gets changed, the agreed change is dropped from the next contract, the employer goes bankrupt, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation takes over pension payments? In determining pension benefits, can PBGC rely on the formal plan documents and most recent collective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases