It’s a Movie. A Rock Musical. And It’s Rooted in 9/11.

Elizabeth Lucas and Jan O’DellNicole Bengiveno/The New York Times Elizabeth Lucas, left, director of “Clear Blue Tuesday,” a movie musical about 9/11, and Jan O’Dell, an actor in the movie who sustained a fractured skull on the real 9/11, near ground zero last week.

There have been songs about Sept. 11, 2001, and there have been movies, and so it has always just a matter of time — 8 years and 51 weeks, it turns out — before New York learned whether it is ready for September 11: The Rock Musical.

Its actual title is “Clear Blue Tuesday,” a film opening at the Quad Cinema in Greenwich Village on Friday. Its cinematic forebears are “Hedwig and the Angry Inch,” “ Moulin Rouge” and the adaptation of “Rent,” and its backers hope they have accidentally happened into the slipstream of “Glee,” a show that did not yet exist during the film’s 19-day shoot in 2007.

“Clear Blue Tuesday” (see trailer) is not about the attack itself, which occurs off camera in the opening scene and is conveyed with blowing dust and office paper. It is more interested in tracking the changes in the lives of 11 characters as the anniversaries flit past: 2002, 2003, 2004, and so on. The attractive and eccentric cast of New Yorkers fall in love and split up, lose jobs, get jobs, shack up — and sing, roughly one song per character.

The film, often doggedly cheerful, will not please uniformly, and only die-hard fans of musicals, very earnest people and Sept. 11 completists are likely to digest it whole.

The songs are all over the map, stylistically and thematically, and include one called “Help Me Help You,” sung by an executive firing a depressed underling, and “Spank It,” a hair-metal piece about playing the drums. In another song, “Reckless,” the singer’s character — a harpist and science fiction fanatic — imagines marrying an alien in space in a scene replete with twinkling stars and floating planets.

“I have very little interest, as a director, in naturalism,” said the director, Elizabeth Lucas. “I find naturalism a little pedestrian.”

She believes the trouble with films about Sept. 11 in general — they include Oliver Stone’s “World Trade Center” (2006) and “The Guys” (2002), which starred Sigourney Weaver — are too serious, “overly ponderous about the topic,” she said. She sees a musical, on the other hand, as a way to delve deeper into the characters: “finding the release and the perspective to look at ourselves and laugh at our tragedies,” she said.

For all the film’s upbeat songs and occasional clowning, the beating and wounded heart in its chest is the character Caroline, played by Jan O’Dell, who was 73 when the film was shot.

Ms. O’Dell sustained a fractured skull when she was struck by falling debris on Sept. 11.

Nine years later, she is still recovering. Caroline is, too.

Ms. O’Dell spent a brief early stint in New York in 1960, performing Off Broadway in “Valmouth,” before returning home to Kansas City, Mo., and careers as a “weather girl” and, later, public-radio host and interviewer. In 1998, now retired, she moved to New York to be closer to a son in Hoboken.

In 2001, Ms. O’Dell was acting and working as a “senior model” in advertisements about medicine and such. She heard a huge boom on Sept. 11, turned on the television to see what was happening, called her son to make sure he was O.K., and left her apartment in Battery Park City, looking up.

She was making her way north on the walkway along the Hudson River when the first tower collapsed. She made it into a crowded boat, but on board, she was struck unconscious by debris that affected her brain.

“It had damaged my sense of balance,” Ms. O’Dell, now 75, said. “I had no sense of where the ground was. Every time I turned my head I would vomit.” Her skull was fractured in several places — “my face was askew” — and she spent a week in the hospital before returning home with a cane and an eye patch. “No more modeling,” she said.

But she eventually returned to acting, and was performing in a play on Martha’s Vineyard when a fellow cast member told her of Ms. Lucas and her Sept. 11 movie.

“I went on the Web site and saw she was casting for singer-songwriters,” Ms. O’Dell said. “I thought, ‘Oh no, that’s not me.’ ” But when the two met anyway to talk about Ms. O’Dell’s Sept. 11 ordeal, Ms. Lucas quickly made an exception and hired her.

All the singers in the cast wrote their own songs, and Ms. O’Dell was urged to do the same. Her song in the film is called “The Day the Sky Fell” and it blurs any line between actor and character. “The sky turned from blue to gray, and I’ll never be like I was before,” she sings. “I came out from under, fighting guilt that I survived.” (Ms. O’Dell, for a time after her injuries, was convinced that she must have jumped ahead of a line to get on the boat in time; counselors convinced her that that was unlikely, and that her reaction was normal.)

Ms. Lucas, 36, a native of Indiana, was home in Washington Heights when the towers fell. Six years later, she was struck by a taxi while bicycling on the Upper West Side, broke her foot and was laid up for three months, “sort of forced reflection time,” she said. She thought of changes she wanted to make, and then imagined a movie full of such moments — “disaster as a catalyst for change in our lives.”

She knew right away it should be a musical, however blithe that may have sounded to others. “ ‘Musical’ is such a dirty word in this context,” she said. “I don’t think of musicals so much as a genre. It’s a way of speaking, it’s not the subject matter.”

She filmed at locations she could never afford to rent, but borrowed from the cast and crew’s circles of friends, including an office in Rockefeller Center, the Ritz-Carlton on Central Park South and an entire floor of 7 World Trade Center. It was one of three films Ms. Lucas directed in 2007, worried that financing for “Clear Blue Tuesday,” the most ambitious of the three, could drag on; there is the slasher flick “Red Hook,” which was released on DVD earlier this year, and “Fade to White,” a sci-fi apocalypse feature filmed in Central Park after a snowstorm, which is in post-production.

“Clear Blue Tuesday” is booked for two weeks at the Quad. Halfway through its run, the city will pause and observe the ninth anniversary of the attacks. Spending part of that day watching a musical has probably never crossed most people’s minds, but this year, the option is available.

“By dealing with emotions, we’re a little uncomfortable,” Ms. Lucas said, “where, by putting it in a musical context, it makes it O.K.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Within days of the 9/11 attck there was speculation in the media as to how long it would take before the “artistic” community would figure out a way to exploit it.

Apparently 8 years and 51 weeks is considered long enough to now turn that horrid day into a money-making rock musical.

Oh, and while Ms. Lucas was whiling away her time in Wash. Hts. that morning — I was standing in horror at the corner of Fulton and Church Sts. thanking my lucky stars that I’d just missed a street light change and hadn’t been able to cross over onto the plaza when the first plane hit 1 WTC..

Somehow, I just can’t get myself geared up to do some singing and dancing about that real life horrors I witnessed that morning.

I guess it’s all a matter of proximity and perspective as to what you call entertainment…..

People are so quick to call things exploitative. Art is supposed to help us understand things. It isn’t inherently exploitative just because the “thing” in question is difficult to understand – in a sense, it makes the work of art even more important.

People think building an Islamic Center, just two blocks away from Ground Zero is not a good thing but that’s the Fabric of Life in NYC – made up of tiny different threads to weave a great American tapestry I proudly call Home. May not be the brightest of ideas but it is what it is.

This idea for a musical about 9/11barely borders on bad taste to just being in really utterly stupid idea. I pride myself in being open minded on everything but a tragedy I went through is not something I can see being made into a musical or comedy – it’s too damn personal.

“Apparently 8 years and 51 weeks is considered long enough to now turn that horrid day into a money-making rock musical.”

Trust me, this will not make money.

It definitely is a matter of perspective. Some remain stuck in that horrible moment while others fight to move on, like this city itself.

I have seen this film. If anything, it is a tribute to New York and to the variety of people within it. It is actually about the personal connections and strength people gain after tragedy (9/11 being the catalyst for this particular film).

9/11 is an uncomfortable subject. No one talks about it. Yet most see it as their own personal tragedy, angry when others even mention it. Being expressive about it artistically seems to be offensive instead of a positive approach to recovery.

My personal story is not necessary. It does not make me better or more important because of my proximity to this or any tragedy. But I found some great stuff within these characters, and think it is a relevant approach, albeit a little unconventional.

I can only speak for myself and say that their is a lot of beauty in this small independent movie. It does not pretend to have all of the answers, but only has a message of hope and the bond NYC and America shares over this particular incident.

“Ms. Lucas was whiling away her time in Wash. Hts. that morning — I was standing in horror at the corner of Fulton and Church Sts.”

The amount of narcissistic self-authenticating that goes on about that day is breathtaking. According to George, I guess anyone outside a three block radius must not have experienced the “real” 9/11.

I’m with A.J: “My personal story is not necessary.”

Subject matter aside, the film looks just dreadful to me.

@5 — You totally misunderstand me. I am certainly not “stuck” on 9/11 despite what I experienced.

And FWIW, I fully support the Park51 Islamic Center — so don’t even think of going there with me — you’ll only dig a deeper whole of wrong assumptions.

But tragedies rarely make good musical theater (e.g. Titanic – the Musical) and someone who has no direct experience with 9/11 can only be exploitative.

Remember if you will the classic dictum to writers — write from your own experience.

This musical sounds not unlike ‘Alive in the World,’ a musical about various people coping after 9/11 that’s had a few different productions in NY. And, coincidentally, Lea Michele of ‘Glee’ was in one of them:
//www.broadwayworld.com/article/Photo_Coverage_Alive_in_the_World_in_Concert_20080115

@6, who said “I guess anyone outside a three block radius must not have experienced the ‘real’ 9/11.”

Take it from someone inside the radius — you didn’t. Can’t comment on the artistic merit (I’ve seen both exquisite and horrid artistic interpretations of the day’s events), but seriously, your perspective is different, and if you weren’t there, you’ll never know.

“….someone who has no direct experience with 9/11 can only be exploitative.”

Says who? Shall we now make a list of the “exploitative” directors, producers, actors, etc., who were involved with films regarding any war in history, the holocaust, the San Francisco earthquake, etc?

What a totally narcissistic, boneheaded comment…..

Red Hook was the worst movie I’ve ever seen.

I want desperately to respond with an intelligent critique of the shameful “reporting” in this article, and about the even more shameful, exploitative, amateurish “film,” because I think the subject matter warrants that degree of respect. Sadly, those involved clearly do not, and right now I’m just a bit too occupied with cleaning up the vomit all over my pants brought on by viewing the trailer, hearing the music, and reading the empty verbal spew Ms. Lucas to continue typing.

Burton Fitzpatrick August 31, 2010 · 2:56 pm

I saw this movie a few months ago.
It is a lovely tale, respectful and touching.
Ms. Lucas is a talent to watch.

It’s amazing how heated everyone gets about people trying to cope and make sense out of tragedies with art. I’ve seen this movie and it’s barely “about” 9/11- more like about the emotions and changes people deal with (or not)in response to tragedy, which, as anyone who has gone thru ANY tragedy knows, can take years. Its funny how ppl get stuck on the fact that it’s got something to do with 9/11, and there’s music, so it must be trying to “commercialize” that day. Wow. Yes maybe musicals in general are not your cup of tea, but if you have any open mindedness, this film is really great for what it IS.

Jennifer, I think you said it way better than I did.

How DARE someone like Steven Spielburg make a movie about the Holocaust, eh?

After all, he wasn’t there, was he? The chutzah of the man, oh, the humanity!

They should include the pro-Towers side as well just to be fair.

Clear Blue Tuesday. Ironic that one of the most memorable things about 9/11 was that before the attack, that morning was as beautiful a day as one ever has in New York. Everyone was commenting, beautiful day, isn’t it, fantastic.

Beyond irony is that there have been such beautiful mornings since then — there was one last week, in fact — and I find that stunningly beautiful mornings remind me of 9/11.

Like A.J. on here, I have seen the film too.

Does anyone remember the vitriol that Martin Scorsese got when he wanted to film, then release, “The Last Temptation of Christ”? Or when similar works of art about delicate subjects are broached? Without fail, everyone tends to quiet down when they’ve actually seen what they criticized blindly at first.

This film isn’t for everyone. If you don’t like people breaking into song (and this film varies from choreographic musical moments to introspective inner thoughts), then avoid it. It’s not for you.

If however you respect someone making an independent movie with hardly any budget (and even now, no distributor), and creating a film that shows New Yorkers bonding together……..what’s wrong if they do it in song?
Operas exist out of very tragic situations, and you’re fooling yourself if somewhere there isn’t an opera being written about 9/11.

There’s a quote I love: “Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life.” When this film, with its multiple viewpoints (and therefore songs that vary to the viewer) comes to its very touching final half hour…the dust from that day gets an artistic washing away.

And for those who just want to snark online…sorry. I’d rather side with those who want to make a difference with their art, and to heal with others.

I find the vitriolic reactions here to be really baffling. Is this topic forever off limits? Is any work of art that attempts to look at how 9/11 changed the lives of New Yorkers inherently exploitative? It seems to me that people are erroneously assuming that because the movie is a musical, it somehow can’t possibly handle the topic with an appropriate amount of respect and depth, and that simply is not true. Not all musicals are comedies. To call this project exploitative or accuse its creators of being interested in “money making” is painfully off the mark. Anyone who’s actually seen this film can attest that it was truly a labor of love. It was an indie project made on a shoe string by people who genuinely cared about approaching the topic in a respectful way. I can understand how for some people the memory of what happened might be too raw for them to want to see this film, but to attack the film without even seeing it is absurd.

@21 — with all due respect, I do not think the negative comments here have been “vitriolic”. I do suggest you consult a dictionary as to the definition of that word and reflect on the incendiary nature of your misapplication of it.

It is possible for people to disagree, even disagree strongly, without rancor or vitriolic response. And that is what has occurred here

As for your own comments — I do not have “raw memories” of that day — although I do indeed have vivid images. And, I certainly would consider a thoughtful, dramatic treatment of that day a very appropriate artistic vehicle.

But, frankly, I think that creating a musical (or, for that matter a comedy) revolving around the events of 9/11 to be misguided at best and offensive to many.

And, that, quite frankly,is why there is a whole world of difference between artistic treatments such as Spielberg’s “Shindler’s List”(noted in comments above) and this 9/11-based song-and-dance revue.

@George
Again, this film is NOT about the events of 9/11. But I can’t convince anyone if that.

@A.J.

But if this film is not about the “events of 9/11″ but it uses 9/11 as it’s setting (including a song entitled: “The Day the Sky Fell”; and if it highlights the role played by Ms. O’Dell as a victim of the attack then is it not “exploitative” of 9/11?

Well, I’ve seen the movie. Parts of it are funny, parts of it are very intense. People do burst out into songs, many of which are good (soundtrack album?). If you don’t like music (not everybody does), you aren’t moved by art or energized by artists (not everybody is), you are hesitant to empathize with semi-fictional characters whose lives were turned around by an otherwise barely mentioned terrorist attack (was yours?), then I’d recommend you stay at home.

Otherwise, get down to the Quad, and watch the show.
At least that would give you some basis for commenting on its merits, rather than settling into those knee-jerk implications:

Art => Exploitation
Musical => Comedy
Comedy => Disrespect
Fiction => Irrelevance
9/11 => “breathtaking narcissistic self-authentication” (@JP, awesome!)
Indie film => making money

@George
I totally see your point. 9/11 is the catalyst, and one of the 11 characters deals directly with her direct experience/injuries (both physical and emotional) and her reclaiming of strength after being forever changed from new yorkers in similar situations, and even others who were far removed from NYC at the time.

I find it difficult to see Jan taking advantage (exploiting) of her own story by choosing to share it, having lived it. It is a choice she made, along with everyone else involved in this small film to share their ideas and individual perspectives in this particular format.

If anything, my personal opinion (I can only speak for myself) is Jan, as well as her character is the core of the film. The other stories swirl around it following their own paths, some close to the events following 9/11 (economy, family, friends, growing up, changing dreams) and others, from a very outside perspective. There is a lot of humor and love in the movie, mostly following how people bonded together and grew, not about the event it self.