I realise this is slightly off topic (apologies for that), but I’d value thoughts of any readers. Basically, does this site constitute an advertisment for chirorpactic?: http://www.bayschiro.co.nz/ My feeling is that it does (I complained to the NZASA, as it refers to infantile colic), but the New Zealand ASA’s opinion is that it is a website not an advert and theefore my complaint will not be considered Reply
William Can I remind you of the rules of this blog, particularly number 6? If you can’t contribute to the comments without resorting to personal abuse, don’t. Reply
Well colour me surprised! If making unsupported claims does not amount to professional missconduct (it’s only a few little white lies that harm no-one after all) in the eyes of chiros, I would be curious to discover what does. I suppose this will all end up in the high court where a judge will end up deciding what “professional” conduct actually means. Hopefully it will eventually turn out to mean something more than “I charge money”. Count me in for (small:) financial support when it is required. By the way, this might be of passing interest to some. The flying chiro:- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1300009/Angry-car-owner-jailed-grabbing-helicopter-tried-off.html Don’t forget that search engine thing. A Jetranger seems to be about £500 an hour to hire. Sorry but I don’t like shrunk URLs due to the security concerns they present. Reply
James Jones You can create links in a comment using the HTML a tag – see this page. So your Daily Mail link could look like this without using a URL-shrinking facility. Some URL-shortening websites also allow you to give a preview of the page before visiting it. Reply