1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MULLIGAN v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.
 

MULLIGAN v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.

Nos. C-13-1037 EMC, C-13-1566 EMC

DENIS MULLIGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants. HAVERHILL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 8, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Lometti , Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll PLLC, Daniel S. Sommers , Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Steven J. Toll , Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll, P.L.L.C., Solomon B. Cera , Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP & Thomas C. Bright , Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP.

Haverhill Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all Others Simiarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher T. Heffelfinger , Berman DeValerio.

Impax Laboratories, Inc., Defendant, represented by Marcy Christina Priedeman , Latham Watkins LLP, Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Peter Allen Wald , Latham & Watkins.

Larry Hsu, Defendant, represented by Marcy Christina Priedeman , Latham Watkins LLP, Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Peter Allen Wald , Latham & Watkins.

Arthur A. Koch, Defendant, represented by Marcy Christina Priedeman , Latham Watkins LLP, Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Peter Allen Wald , Latham & Watkins.

City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System, Movant, represented by Blair Allen Nicholas , Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann.

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement. Having reviewed the papers submitted, the Court hereby orders that the parties submit supplemental briefing and/or evidence on the following issues.

(1) Plaintiffs assert in their motion that the $8,000,000 Settlement Fund "represents a substantial portion of the total Class...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases