CULLAN AND CULLAN LLC v. M-QUBE, INC.

No. 8:13CV172.

CULLAN AND CULLAN LLC, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. M-QUBE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff, and MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS, Inc., a Delaware corporation; CF ENTERPRISES PTY., LTD., an Australian company; and JOHN DOES 1-200, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska.

May 5, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cullan and Cullan LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Ben Barnow , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Erich P. Schork , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Mitchell L. Burgess , BURGESS, LAMB LAW FIRM, Ralph K. Phalen , PHALEN LAW OFFICE, Richard J. Schicker , SCHICKER LAW FIRM & Sharon A. Harris , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM.

M-Qube, Inc. a Delaware corporation, Defendant, represented by Ari N. Rothman , VENABLE LAW FIRM, John P. Passarelli , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM, Molly T. Cusson , VENABLE LAW FIRM & Paul R. Gwilt , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM.

Mobile Messenger Americas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, represented by Ari N. Rothman , VENABLE LAW FIRM, John P. Passarelli , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM, Molly T. Cusson , VENABLE LAW FIRM & Paul R. Gwilt , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM.

CF Enterprises Pty., Ltd., an Australian Company, Defendant, represented by Carrie S. Dolton , GOBER, HILGERS LAW FIRM & Michael T. Hilgers , GOBER, HILGERS LAW FIRM.

Richard Geier, Movant, represented by Matthew J. Zuchetto , SCOTT LAW GROUP, Renae D. Steiner , HEINS, MILLS LAW FIRM & Toby J. Marshall , TERRELL, MARSHALL LAW FIRM.

David Hanson, Intervenor, represented by Elizabeth A. Ryan , BAILEY, GLASSER LAW FIRM, Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld , KRONENBERGER, BURGOYNE LAW FIRM, John J. Roddy , BAILEY, GLASSER LAW FIRM, Karl S. Kronenberger , KRONENBERGER, BURGOYNE LAW FIRM & William L. Reinbrecht , CAR, REINBRECHT LAW FIRM.

Kristian Kunder, Intervenor, represented by Elizabeth A. Ryan , BAILEY, GLASSER LAW FIRM, Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld , KRONENBERGER, BURGOYNE LAW FIRM, John J. Roddy , BAILEY, GLASSER LAW FIRM, Karl S. Kronenberger , KRONENBERGER, BURGOYNE LAW FIRM & William L. Reinbrecht , CAR, REINBRECHT LAW FIRM.

Mobile Messenger Americas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Ari N. Rothman , VENABLE LAW FIRM, John P. Passarelli , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM, Molly T. Cusson , VENABLE LAW FIRM & Paul R. Gwilt , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM.

Cullan and Cullan LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Counter Defendant, represented by Ben Barnow , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Erich P. Schork , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Mitchell L. Burgess , BURGESS, LAMB LAW FIRM, Ralph K. Phalen , PHALEN LAW OFFICE, Richard J. Schicker , SCHICKER LAW FIRM & Sharon A. Harris , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM.

M-Qube, Inc. a Delaware corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Ari N. Rothman , VENABLE LAW FIRM, John P. Passarelli , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM, Molly T. Cusson , VENABLE LAW FIRM & Paul R. Gwilt , KUTAK, ROCK LAW FIRM.

Cullan and Cullan LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Counter Defendant, represented by Ben Barnow , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Erich P. Schork , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Mitchell L. Burgess , BURGESS, LAMB LAW FIRM, Ralph K. Phalen , PHALEN LAW OFFICE, Richard J. Schicker , SCHICKER LAW FIRM & Sharon A. Harris , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM.

CF Enterprises Pty., Ltd., an Australian Company, Counter Claimant, represented by Carrie S. Dolton , GOBER, HILGERS LAW FIRM & Michael T. Hilgers , GOBER, HILGERS LAW FIRM.

Cullan and Cullan LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Counter Defendant, represented by Ben Barnow , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Erich P. Schork , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, Mitchell L. Burgess , BURGESS, LAMB LAW FIRM, Ralph K. Phalen , PHALEN LAW OFFICE, Richard J. Schicker , SCHICKER LAW FIRM & Sharon A. Harris , BARNOW & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM.


AMENDED ORDER FOR INITIAL PROGRESSION OF CASE

This matter comes before the court on the parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadlines and for Continuance of Hearing Date (Filing No. 145). The motion is granted as set forth below.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Certifying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases