Exide Technologies

Public-Side DIP Lender Presentation

September 30, 2014

Exhibit 99.1

2

Disclaimer

This

presentation

may

contain

certain

statements

that

may

be

deemed

“forward-looking

statements”

as

defined

in

the

U.S.

Private

Securities

Litigation

Reform

Act

of

1995.  All statements that address activities, events or developments that we intend, expect, plan, project, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are

forward-looking statements.  By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances

that may or may not occur in the future.  The Company undertakes

no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to (a) projections of revenues, cost of raw materials, income or loss, earnings or loss per share,

capital expenditures, growth prospects, dividends, the effect of

currency translations, capital structure, and other financial items, (b) statements of plans and

objectives of the Company or its management or Board of Directors, including the introduction of new products, or estimates or predictions of actions by customers,

suppliers,

competitors

or

regulating

authorities,

(c)

statements

of

future

economic

performance,

(d)

statements

regarding

liquidity

and

(e)

statements

of

assumptions,

such

as

the

prevailing

weather

conditions

in

the

Company’s

market

areas,

underlying

other

statements

and

statements

about

the

Company

or

its

business,

and

(f)

statements regarding tax and liquidity impacts from asset sales and restructuring activities.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following general factors such as:

(i) the ability of the Company to develop, prosecute, confirm and consummate the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, (ii) the potential adverse impact of the Chapter

11 filing on the Company's liquidity and operations and the risks associated with operating businesses under Chapter 11 protection, (iii) the ability of the Company to

comply with the terms of the DIP financing facility, (iv) the Company's ability to obtain additional financing, (v) the Company's ability to retain key management and

employees, (vi) customer response to the Chapter 11 filing, (vii) the risk factors or uncertainties listed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities

and Exchange Commission (including, without limitation, those risk factors described in the Company’s fiscal 2014 Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31,

2014) and with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in connection with the Company's Chapter 11 filing, (viii) the fact that lead, a major constituent in most of the Company’s

products, experiences significant fluctuations in market price and is a hazardous material that may give rise to costly environmental and safety claims, (ix) the

Company’s ability to implement and fund business strategies based on current liquidity, (x) the Company’s ability to realize anticipated efficiencies and avoid

additional unanticipated costs related to its restructuring activities, (xi) the cyclical nature of the industries in which the Company operates and the impact of current

adverse economic conditions on those industries, (xii) unseasonable weather (warm winters and cool summers) which adversely affects demand for automotive and

some industrial batteries, (xiii) the Company’s substantial debt and debt service requirements which may restrict the Company’s operational and financial flexibility, as

well

as

imposing

significant

interest

and

financing

costs,

(xiv)

the

litigation

proceedings

to

which

the

Company

is

subject,

the

results

of

which

could

have

a

material

adverse effect on the Company and its business, (xv) the realization of the tax benefits of the Company’s net operating loss carry forwards, which is dependent upon

future

taxable

income,

(xvi)

competitiveness

of

the

battery

markets

in

the

Americas

and

Europe,

(xvii)

risks

involved

in

foreign

operations

such

as

disruption

of

markets, changes in import and export laws, currency restrictions, currency exchange rate fluctuations and possible terrorist attacks against U.S. interests, (xviii) the

ability

to

acquire

goods

and

services

and/or

fulfill

later

needs

at

budgeted

costs,

(xix)

general

economic

conditions,

(xx)

the

Company’s

ability

to

successfully

pass

along increased material costs to its customers, (xxi) recently adopted U.S. lead emissions standards and the implementation of such standards by applicable states,

and (xxii) the Company’s ability to resume operations at its Vernon, California recycling facility.

3

I.

Chapter 11 Process Update

II.

DIP Amendment Request

III.

Q&A

Agenda

4

Introduction

Exide Technologies (“Exide”

or the “Company”) appreciates the opportunity to meet with public-side DIP lenders to provide

an update on its Chapter 11 process and discuss the DIP amendment request

Since the July DIP lender call, certain developments have materialized that delayed the Company’s plan of reorganization

(“POR”) process

Inventory overstatement at Canon Hollow

Increased financial demands from California regulators related to the Vernon, CA facility permit process and remediation activities

Recently announced DOJ/EPA inquiry in connection with Vernon

The Company has made progress to resolve these issues but is unlikely to satisfy the Plan Support Agreement (“PSA”)

condition for DIP maturity extension by October 12

Conversations with regulators and POR negotiations with the Unofficial Committee of Senior Secured Noteholders (“UNC”) continue

Exide is hopeful that it will reach agreement in the near-term on a POR term sheet supported by the UNC

The Company will also begin to explore other strategic alternatives as outlined by the amendment

Provides assurance of clear exit paths for the Chapter 11 case

Given the current situation, the Company is requesting certain amendments to its DIP facilities to provide for the time and

flexibility necessary to pursue restructuring strategies to maximize value

5

Dual-Track Timeline

Set forth below is the timeline and key dates associated with the Company’s contemplated dual-track restructuring strategy

POR negotiations and

sale process

preparation/launch

January 15, 2015

Court approval of stalking horse bid procedures

November 17, 2014

Sign PSA or begin sale

process/distribute

marketing materials

January 15, 2015

Court approval of

Disclosure Statement

March 10, 2015

Confirmation of

an acceptable

POR

March 31, 2015

Plan effectiveness

March 10, 2015

Court approval

of sale

March 31, 2015

Sale consummation

December 23, 2014

Signed stalking horse

agreement

September 24, 2014

DIP lender meeting

6

I.

Chapter 11 Process Update

II.

DIP Amendment Request

III.

Q&A

Agenda

7

Maturity Date

March 31, 2015 (5¹/2

month extension)

(1)

Financial

Covenants

Remove minimum EBITDA covenant

Minimum liquidity covenant: $50 million ($15 million increase)

Minimum US liquidity covenant: $25 million (new provision)

US liquidity defined as US cash plus excess availability

Maximum capital expenditures based on schedule below with no

carry-over (new provision):

Negative

Covenants

Permitted asset sale basket of $25 million removed with exception for Nox credit sale process recently approved by the Court

Tighten permitted debt baskets

Milestones

Signed PSA or initiation of sale process –

11/17/2014

If POR process pursued:

Disclosure Statement approval –

1/15/2015

Confirmation –

3/10/2015

If sale process pursued:

Signed stalking horse agreement –

12/23/2014

Stalking horse agreement/bid procedures

approved –

1/15/2015

Sale approved –

3/10/2015

Other

ABL Lenders extend with the following proposed modifications:

Revolver commitment reduced to $200 million ($25 million reduction)

Ability to exercise remedies at the direction of Required Revolver Lenders

(instead of Required Lenders) in effect under certain circumstances if POR

not delivered in accordance with adjusted milestones

Cash anti-hoarding provision

Refreshed field exam and inventory appraisal update by 9/30

Termination of the delivered stalking horse agreement shall

be an event of default

Pricing:

Amendment Fee

75 bps

Timing

Signature pages due by 5 p.m. New York time on Friday, October 3

Level

$35 million

$12.5 million

Quarter-ending 12/31/2014

Each month thereafter

Period

DIP Amendment Request

(1)

Initial

maturity

extension

through

November

4,

2014,

with

full

maturity

extension

conditioned

on

court

approval

of

the

pricing

components

of

the

amendment,

which

will

be

retroactively

effective upon court approval.

(2)    Payable on full commitment amount at 12/31/14.

Drawn

Undrawn

Duration Fee

(2)

Existing

L+325 bps

50 bps

N/A

Post amendment

L+400 bps

100 bps

N/A

After 12/31/14

L+450 bps

150 bps

50 bps

rd

8

Closing Remarks

Well-defined process in place with clear path to consummation of Chapter 11 case

Continued support of DIP lenders is critical to positive outcome

More time and flexibility needed to bridge to POR or organized sale process

Would avoid significant risk to all stakeholders in unmanaged scenario

9

I.

Chapter 11 Process Update

II.

DIP Amendment Request

III.

Q&A

Agenda