1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 

O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. C-13-3826 EMC.

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

October 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas O'Connor, Plaintiff, represented by Ben Weber , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C., Matthew David Carlson , Carlson Legal Services, Sara Smolik , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C. & Shannon Liss-Riordan , Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C..

Thomas Colopy, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew David Carlson , Carlson Legal Services, Sara Smolik , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C. & Shannon Liss-Riordan , Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C..

Matthew Manahan, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew David Carlson , Carlson Legal Services & Shannon Liss-Riordan , Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C..

Wilson Rolle, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by Shannon Liss-Riordan , Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C..

William Anderson, Plaintiff, represented by Shannon Liss-Riordan , Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C..

Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert Jon Hendricks , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Caitlin Victoria May , Morgan, Lewis and Bockius LLP, John C. Fish, Jr. , Littler Mendelson, PC, Stephen A. Swedlow , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP & Stephen Luther Taeusch , Morgan Lewis & Bockius.

Travis Kalanick, Defendant, represented by Robert Jon Hendricks , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, John C. Fish, Jr. , Littler Mendelson, PC & Stephen Luther Taeusch , Morgan Lewis & Bockius.

Ryan Graves, Defendant, represented by Robert Jon Hendricks , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, John C. Fish, Jr. , Littler Mendelson, PC & Stephen Luther Taeusch , Morgan Lewis & Bockius.

Caren Ehret, Movant, represented by Myron Milton Cherry , Myron M. Cherry & Associates LLC.

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND SCHEDULE Docket No. 166

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

On October 8, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a request for clarification of this Court's order amending the briefing schedule on Defendant's motion for summary judgment. Docket No. 166. Plaintiffs indicate that they intend to file a motion for summary judgment as well, and request clarification as to whether both sides' motions should be filed on November 21, 2014...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases