1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MARTINEZ v. COUNTY OF SONOMA
 

MARTINEZ v. COUNTY OF SONOMA

Case No. 15-cv-01953-JST.

MYRAH MARTINEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 1, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Myrah Martinez, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

Kitara McCray, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

Madison Marlene Marvel, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

S.S., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

R.M., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

Jenifer Stum, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

County of Sonoma, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

Sonoma County Human Services Department, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

Sonoma County Family, Youth and Children's Services, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

Jerry Dunn, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

Nick Honey, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

Stacie Kabour, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE Re: ECF No. 61

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses from Defendants' Joint Answer. ECF No. 61. The motion is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

The factual background of this case is well known...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases