89 trees missing from linux-next

[Posted September 27, 2011 by corbet]

From:		Stephen Rothwell <sfr-AT-canb.auug.org.au>
To:		LKML <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>
Subject:		linux-next: state of the trees
Date:		Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:00:21 +1000
Message-ID:		<20110927140021.e69d2cb3c47f07a6aeeafee0@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:		linux-next-AT-vger.kernel.org, Linus <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>
Archive‑link:		Article

Hi all,

I have just done a quick check of the trees that are merged into
linux-next each day.  Of the 171 trees that represent work for the next
merge window, 89 only exist on kernel.org machines.  This means
(obviously) that I have not had updates to those 89 trees since the
kernel.org servers were taken down.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

(Log in to post comments)

89 trees missing from linux-next

Posted Sep 27, 2011 17:35 UTC (Tue) by yann.morin.1998 (guest, #54333) [Link]

> 89 trees missing from linux-next

That's gona be a lot of paper...
Not counting all missing trees every years in the amazonian rain forest...

Sigh... ;-)

89 trees missing from linux-next

Posted Sep 27, 2011 19:07 UTC (Tue) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]

Since Linus is planning to hold off the merge window until after he gets back from vacation, hopefully that will give kernel.org time to get back up and these trees to get updated and at least a little testing.