1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GRIMARD v. MONTREAL, MAINE AND ATLANTIC RAILWAY, INC.
 

GRIMARD v. MONTREAL, MAINE AND ATLANTIC RAILWAY, INC.

No. 13 C 6197.

MARIE-JOSEE GRIMARD, etc., Plaintiff, v. MONTREAL, MAINE AND ATLANTIC RAILWAY, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

September 5, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MARIE-JOSEE GRIMARD, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Western Petroleum Company, Defendant, represented by Leslie M. Smith , Kirkland & Ellis LLP & Mark Robert Filip , Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

Petroleum Transport Solutions, Defendant, represented by Leslie M. Smith , Kirkland & Ellis LLP & Mark Robert Filip , Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

Rail World, Inc., Defendant, represented by Alan Scott Gilbert , Dentons US LLP, Steven Lawrence Merouse , Dentons US LLP & Tiffany L. Amlot , Dentons US LLP.

Edward A Burkhardt, Defendant, represented by Alan Scott Gilbert , Dentons US LLP, Steven Lawrence Merouse , Dentons US LLP & Tiffany L. Amlot , Dentons US LLP.

Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC, Defendant, represented by Cal Richard Burnton , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Michael R. Dockterman , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Edward Timothy Walker , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Megan Colleen Hugo , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & William Robert Andrichik , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP.

DPTS Marketing, LLC, Defendant, represented by Cal Richard Burnton , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Michael R. Dockterman , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Edward Timothy Walker , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Megan Colleen Hugo , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & William Robert Andrichik , Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP.

World Fuel Services Corporation, Defendant, represented by Leslie M. Smith , Kirkland & Ellis LLP & Mark Robert Filip , Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

This action has been removed from the Circuit Court of Cook County to this District Court, with the Joint Notice of Removal ("Notice") seeking to invoke federal jurisdiction on the basis of (1) the action's assertedly "being related to cases under Title XI" (see 28 U.S.C. §§1334(b) and 1452(a)1) as well as (2) diversity of citizenship pursuant to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases