UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KT

For the transition period from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011

Commission file number:  000-53668

NET TALK.COM, INC.

 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (305) 621 1200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨           No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes ¨           No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x                       No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KT or any amendment to this Form 10-KT

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨           No x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common stock as of December 31, 2011, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed year end,  was $0.25 .  For purposes of this computation, the registrant has excluded the market value of all shares of its common stock reported as being beneficially owned by executive officers and directors and holders of more than 10% of the common stock on a fully diluted basis of the registrant; such exclusion shall not, however,  be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an “affiliate” of the registrant.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Net Talk.com, Inc.

Form 10-KT

For the transition period October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-KT and other written material and oral statements made from time to time by us do not relate to historical or current facts.  As such, they are referred to as “forward-looking statements,” which are intended to convey our expectations or predictions regarding the occurrence of possible future events or the existence of trends and factors that may impact our future plans and operating results. These forward-looking statements are derived, in part, from various assumptions and analyses we have made in the context of our current business plan and information currently available to us and in light of our experience and perceptions of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate in the circumstances. You can generally identify forward-looking statements through words and phrases such as “ seek, ” “ anticipate, ” “ believe, ” “ estimate, ” “ expect, ” “ intend, ” “ plan, ” “ budget, ” “ project, ” “ may be, ” “ may continue, ” “ may likely result, ” and similar expressions. When reading any forward looking statement, you should remain mindful that actual results or developments may vary substantially from those expected as expressed in or implied by that statement for a number of reasons or factors, such as those relating to:

Each forward-looking statement should be read in context with, and with an understanding of, the various other disclosures concerning our Company and our business made elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as other public reports filed with the SEC. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a prediction of actual results or developments. We are not obligated to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this report to reflect new events or circumstances unless and to the extent required by applicable law.

Part I

Item 1.  Business

Company and Business

We are a telephone company, which provides, sells and supplies commercial and residential telecommunication services, including services utilizing voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) technology, session initiation protocol (“SIP”) technology, wireless fidelity technology, wireless maximum technology, marine satellite services technology and other similar type technologies. Our main products are the “DUO” and the “DUO WIFI”. The DUO WIFI is expected to roll out to customers during March 2012. Both of these products are analog telephone adapters that provide connectivity for analog telephones and faxes to home, home office or corporate local area networks (“LAN”). The DUO WIFI allows users to use these services without an Ethernet cable plugged into the device. We no longer offer the TK 6000 for sale to customers.

Our DUO and DUO WIFI and their related services are cost effective solution for individuals, small businesses and telecommuters connecting to any analog telephone, fax or private branch exchange (“PBX”).  Our DUO and DUO WIFI provide a USB port, one Ethernet port and one analog telephone port. The DUO WIFI additionally provides a wireless chip so that users can connect to the device over WIFI hotspots. A full suite of internet protocol features is available to maximize universal connectivity. In addition, analog telephones attached to our DUO and DUO WIFI are able to use advanced calling features such as call forwarding, caller ID, 3-way calling, call holding, call retrieval and call transfer.

History and Overview

We are a Florida corporation, incorporated on May 1, 2006 under the name Discover Screens, Inc. (“Discover Screens”).

Prior to September 10, 2008, we were known as Discover Screens, a company dedicated to providing advertising through interactive, audiovisual, information and advertising portals located in high-traffic indoor venues. Our name and business operations changed in a series of transactions beginning in December of 2007.

On September 10, 2008, we changed our name from Discover Screens, Inc. to Net Talk.com, Inc.

On September 10, 2008, we acquired certain tangible and intangible assets, formerly owned by Interlink Global Corporation (“Interlink”), directly from Interlink’s creditor who had seized the assets pursuant to a Security and Collateral Agreement.

Our Strategy

We continue to improve and enhance the following factors in building and expanding our customer base:

Plan of Operation

We provide, sell and supply commercial and residential telecommunication services, including services utilizing voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) technology, session initiation protocol (“SIP”) technology, wireless fidelity technology, wireless maximum technology, marine satellite services technology and other similar type technologies. We are developing our business infrastructure and new products and services.

Our Products

At this time, our main products are the DUO and DUO WIFI. Our DUO and DUO WIFI are designed to provide specifications unique to each customer’s existing equipment. They allow the customer full mobile flexibility by being able to take internet interface anywhere the customer has an internet connection. Our DUO and DUO WIFI both have the following features:

A Universal Serial Bus (“USB”) connection allowing the interconnection of our DUO and DUO WIFI to any host computer.

In addition to the USB power source option, our DUO and DUO WIFI have an external power supply allowing the phone to independently power itself when not connected to a host computer;

Unlike most VoIP telephone systems, our DUO and DUO WIFI both have standalone feature allowing them to be plugged directly into a standard internet connection.

Our DUO and DUO WIFI are compact, space-efficient products.

Our DUO and DUO WIFI both have interface components so that the customer can purchase multiple units that can communicate with each other allowing simultaneous ringing from multiple locations.

Our products are portable and allow our customers to make and receive phone calls with a telephone anywhere a broadband internet connection is available.  We transmit the calls using Voice over Internet Protocol “VOIP” technology, which converts voice signals into digital data transmissions over the internet.

Our Services

Our business is to provide products and services that utilize Voice Over Internet Protocol, which we refer to as “VoIP.” VoIP is a technology that allows the consumer to make telephone calls over a broadband internet connection instead of using a regular (or analog) telephone line. VoIP works by converting the user’s voice into a digital signal that travels over the internet until it reaches its destination. If the user is calling a regular telephone line number, the signal is converted back into a voice signal once it reaches the end user. Our business model is to develop and commercialize software technology solutions for cost effective, real-time communications over the internet and related services.

Patents – Domestic and International

Our products are currently under US patent pending as well as International patent pending in over 123 countries.

Marketing

We have developed direct sales channels, as represented by web sites and toll free numbers.  Our direct sales channels are supported by highly integrated advertising campaigns across multiple media such as infomercials, television and other media channels.   Our website is www.nettalk.com, our telephone number is 305-621-1200 and our fax number is 305-621-1201.

Our primary source of revenue is the sale and distribution of our NetTalk DUO. We will be offering our DUO WIFI to customers starting in March of 2012.  We also generate revenue from the sale of accessories to our product and international long distance monthly charges that are billed to our customers.

Advertising

Our goal is to position ourselves as a premier supplier of choice for VoIP services. Our current business strategy is to focus our advertising dollars on our home market in South Florida.  Our advertising will consist of mass marketing campaigns focusing on television infomercials for the South Florida market and other states including cable television channels..

Customers

Our customers are made up of retail, residential and small businesses. We anticipate that future services will appeal to our existing customers and hope that our additional phone products and services will provide a complete phone package experience to our customers.

Our target audience is individual consumers and small businesses looking to lower their current cost of telecommunications. We are also reaching a large audience with our websites. We hope that consumers will find our websites by doing an internet search for VoIP service providers. We also use other means of advertising such as direct to consumer sales, ecommerce and retail marketing coops with retail customers.

Geographic Markets

Our primary geographic market is our home market of South Florida. Our target audiences are individual consumers and small businesses looking to lower their current cost of telecommunications.  We also expect to reach a large audience with our websites. We hope that consumers will find our websites by doing an internet search for VoIP service providers. We will also use other means of advertising such as direct to consumer sales, ecommerce and coop marketing with retail stores.

We have been granted and or are applying for Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) Licenses in forty three states, as follows:

It is our intent to focus our expansion on the geographic markets in which we have been granted CLEC Licenses. We also intend to expand our market place to reach customers worldwide.

The Industry

In the past decade, the use of the internet for all purposes has exploded.  VoIP is a technology that enables communications over the internet through the compression of voice, video and/or other media into data packets that can be efficiently transmitted over data networks and then converted back into the original media at the other end of the transmission. Since the introduction of the first VoIP technology in the mid 1990s, the quality and clarity of VoIP connections have continued to evolve and improve.   Perhaps the biggest jump in VoIP quality came with the introduction of SIP, or Session Initiation Protocol. SIP is a text-based protocol suitable for integrated voice-data applications. Today SIP is the predominant industry standard for establishing multimedia communications over the Internet. As the clarity and quality of VoIP services have increased, so has the acceptance of VoIP by consumers.

As a result of the potential cost savings and added feature availability of VoIP, consumers, industry leaders and traditional telecommunication service providers see VoIP as the future of telecommunications.  Factors that have been contributing to the boom in VoIP use include: (a) increased consumer demand for lower cost telephone services; (b) increased demand for long distance services as the market place becomes increasingly global; (c) improved reliability and quality of VoIP due to technological advances; and (d) innovations that allow services for VoIP users that are not available in traditional telephone services. These factor, and others, have resulted in various service providers and consumers exploring VoIP alternatives to traditional analog phone services.

Our Competition

The communications industry is highly competitive and significantly affected by regulatory changes, technology evolution, marketing strategies, and pricing decisions of the larger industry participants.  The market for our services is evolving rapidly and is subject to shifting customer demands and the introduction of new products and services. Our current and potential competitors come from different market sectors and vary in size and scope with respect to the products and services that they offer or intend to offer in the future.

One of our competitors in the domestic market is traditional telephone service providers that are increasingly adding advanced service features to traditional telephone services. Domestic telephone providers have the advantage of having strong name recognition, large research and development budgets and existing service and market networks.

In addition, numerous vendors sell products and services using VoIP technology. Our competitors use innovations such as Analogue Terminal Adapters, or ATAs, to connect an analogue telephone to a VoIP network. Sometimes referred to as VoIP Gateways, these devices are widely advertised and sold. Sales are conducted by many different methods, including internet and infomercial sales, and barriers to entry into the business are low.

We also face competition from alternative communication methods such as internet, fax providers and voice mail service providers.

Many of our competitors may be better established, larger and better financed than us, and are able to use their visibility and substantial marketing resources to attract customers. In particular, many of our competitors are large, established network service providers that are able to market and distribute enhanced communication services within their already large base of subscribers. As a result, these competitors maybe able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies  and changes in customer requirements.  They may also be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products.  Moreover, we may not have sufficient resources to undertake the continuing research and development necessary to remain competitive.

We differentiate our services from those offered by our competitors by offering exceptional customer service and lower cost alternatives. We have worked hard to control the development costs associated with the DUO WIFI.  We have done this by choosing phone components and component vendors that are economical but do not compromise on quality. We have developed and marketed our own products and services, rather than simply reselling another manufacturer’s innovations. Finally, our DUO and DUO WIFI products are standalone phone products that do not require the user to first invest in a computer. For these reasons, we know that our DUO and DUO WIFI product is a lower cost alternative to similar telephone products currently being marketed (because we are engaged in the same cost saving measures for the services we offer). We are able to offer those services at a competitive price.

Our products and services are user friendly and convenient for our customers; for example, our packaging includes detailed, user friendly instructions and diagrams to allow for easy installation and activation. We have distinguished ourselves from our main competitors through the level of customer service offered to our consumers following their purchase or our products or services. Currently, our competitors only offer customer service through an email query program. This does not allow the customer to receive rapid, real-time problem solving assistance in the event our competitor’s product or service fails. In contrast, we established a customer service online forum where our users can post their questions and read other users’ responses. The forum has key word or key phrase search option so that our customers can easily find a solution to the problem they are experiencing. Our forum is moderated by one of our development engineers to ensure that all questions are being properly addressed and issues resolved.  We also offer a pay-per-use live customer support hotline. By paying a fee, either per minute or per call, our customers are able to reach a support specialist to get a direct answer to their questions.  This allows us to provide superior customer service, while still keeping our costs low.

Government Regulation

As a telecommunications supplier, we are subject to extensive government regulation. The majority of our government regulation comes from the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”).

Telecommunications is an area of rapid regulatory change. Changes in the laws and regulations and new interpretations of existing laws and regulations may affect permissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and amounts paid to us for our services. We cannot predict the future of federal, state and local regulations or legislation, including FCC regulations.

Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regulation

The FCC is an independent United States government agency. The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. The FCC’s jurisdiction covers all fifty states, the District of Columbia and U.S. possessions.

The FCC works to create an environment promoting competition and innovation to benefit communications customers. Where necessary, the FCC has acted to ensure VoIP providers comply with important public safety requirements and public policy goals.

Interconnected VoIP providers must comply with the Commission’s Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) requirements, including contributing to the TRS Fund used to support the provision of telecommunications services to persons with speech or hearing disabilities, and offering 711 abbreviated dialing for access to relay services. Interconnected VoIP providers and equipment manufacturers also must ensure that, consistent with Section 255 of the Communication Act, their services are available to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if such access is readily achievable.

Finally, the FCC now requires interconnected VoIP providers and telephone companies that obtain numbers from them to comply with Local Number Portability (LNP) rules. These rules allow telephone, and now VoIP, subscribers that change providers to keep the subscribers telephone numbers provided that they stay in the same geographic area. VoIP providers must also contribute to funds established to share LNP and numbering administrative costs among all telecommunications providers benefiting from these services.

The FCC monitors and investigates complaints against VoIP providers and, if necessary, can bring enforcement actions against VoIP providers that do not comply with applicable regulations.

Federal CALEA

On August 5, 2005, the Federal Communication Commission (the FCC) released an Order extending the obligation of the Communication Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (“CALEA”) to interconnect VOIP providers. Under CALEA , telecommunication carriers must assist law enforcement in executing electronic surveillance, which includes the capability of providing call content and call indentifying information to local enforcement agencies, or LEA, pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization.

The FCC required all interconnect VOIP providers to become CALEA compliant by May 14, 2007. To date, we are fully compliant with CALEA.

State Telecommunication Regulation

We are also registered with the Florida Public Utilities Commission as a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) and Interexchange (“IXC”) Carrier.

In Florida, a “competitive local exchange carrier” is defined as any company, other than an incumbent local exchange company, certificated by the Public Service Commission to provide local exchange telecommunication services in the state of Florida on or after July 1, 1995. CLEC companies providing services in Florida after July 1, 1995, must be certificated by the Florida Public Service Commission, and competitive local exchange companies are required to file a price list specifying their rates and charges for basic local telecommunication services.

Florida, as well as other states, also regulates providers of Interexchange Telecommunications (“IXC”). The Florida Public Service Commission includes the following as examples of IXC providers: (1) operator service providers; (2) resellers; (3) switchless re-billers; (4) multi-location discount aggregators; (5) prepaid debit card providers; and (5) facilities based interexchange carriers. Section 364.02(13) of the Florida Statutes requires IXCs to provide current contact information and a tariff to the Florida Public Service Commission.

We have been granted and or are applying for Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) Licenses in forty three states, as follows:

The law relating to regulation of VoIP technology is in a flux. In recent court cases, other VoIP providers have challenged whether state regulations can be applied to VoIP technology or whether such regulation has been preempted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other Federal laws. At least one of our competitors has successfully fought the application of state laws to VoIP technology. However, to be cautious, we will continue to obtain a competitive local exchange carrier license from each state in which we conduct business. An added advantage of obtaining a CLEC license from each state is that we can obtain an operational carrier number from the North American Numbering Plan Administration. The operational carrier number will allow us to assign our customers telephone numbers in the area code in which they reside.

Employees

We employ 52 full-time and no part-time employees, none of our employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our employee relations to be satisfactory.

 Intellectual Property

We regard our domain names, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade dress, trade secrets, proprietary technologies and similar intellectual property as critical to our success, and we rely on patent, trademark and copyright law, trade-secret protection, and confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners, and others to protect our proprietary rights.

We have filed multiple patent applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the technology associated with our products. We also have software under development by our employees, subcontractors and consultants.

The status of any patent involves complex legal and factual questions, and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that any patent application filed by us will result in a patent being issued or that our issued patents, and any patents that may be issued in the future, will afford adequate protection against competitors with similar technology. We similarly face the risk that any patents issued to us might be infringed or designed around by others.

Patents – Domestic and International

Our products are currently under US patent pending as well as International patent pending in over 123 countries.

Research and Development

We expense research and development expenses, as these costs are incurred. We account for our offering-related software development costs as costs incurred internally in creating a computer software product and are charged to expense when incurred as research and development until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program design or, in its absence, completion of a working model.  At this time, our main product the DUO is being sold in the market place. The DUO WIFI will be sold to customers starting in March 2012.   Therefore, research and development cost reported in our financial statements relates development of the DUO WIFI and pre – marketing costs and are expensed accordingly.

On July 14, 2010 we revealed our newest product the net TALK DUO (“DUO”).

Our DUO offers our customers free nationwide calls to any landline or mobile phone in the U.S. and Canada from anywhere in the world, as well as low-cost international rates.  It’s also a versatile digital phone service with no monthly fees, no contracts and no computer required.

Our DUO is flexible enough to connect directly to your Internet connection through the router/modem, there is also a convenient option with our DUO to connect to your computer. The sleek design is small enough to fit in the palm of your hand, making it a portable device.

Our DUO reduces the wear and tear on your home or office computer and reduces energy costs, resulting in money savings.  Our fax-friendly DUO, offers fax (incoming and outgoing), a unique feature not offered, to our knowledge, by similar digital phone services.

The portability of this small device is also great for international travelers who want to place free nationwide calls to the U.S. and Canada, or who are looking for a low-cost solution for international rates. Calls to other netTALK customers are always free.

We are presently working on other new products and anticipate future deployment the later part of this year and over the next year.

Item 1 A. Risk factors

This Annual Report on Form 10 KT contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Reference is made in particular to the description of our plans and objectives for future operations, assumptions underlying such plans and objectives and other forward-looking statements included in this section, “Item 1 Business,” “Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in other places in this Annual Report. Such statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “believe”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “continue”, or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of such terms. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Factors that could cause such results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements include those set forth below.

Risks Relating to Our Business:

WE HAVE A HISTORY OF LOSSES WHICH MAY CONTINUE, WHICH MAY NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO ACHIEVE OUR BUSINESS OBJECTIVES.

We incurred net losses of $3,440,286 and $1,227,549 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise.

There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. Revenues and profits, if any, will depend upon various factors, including whether we will be able to continue expansion of our revenue. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have an adverse impact on us.

OUR BUSINESS MAY BE AFFECTED BY FACTORS OUTSIDE OF OUR CONTROL.

Our ability to increase sales, and to profitably distribute and sell our products and services, is subject to a number of risks, including changes in our business relationships with our principal distributors, competitive risks such as the entrance of additional competitors into our markets, pricing and technological competition, risks associated with the development and marketing of new products and services in order to remain competitive and risks associated with changing economic conditions and government regulation.

Item 2. Properties

Description of properties

Our principal executive offices are located at 1100 NW 163rd Drive, Miami, Florida 33169.  Our offices consist of approximately 3,500 square feet. Our lease was extended on June 1^st, 2011 for a term of 1 year, terminating on May 31, 2012. The facility is suitable for our purposes and is expected to accommodate our needs until we move all company operations to our newly purchased building.

On August 8, 2011 we purchased an existing building located in Miami, Florida to be used as our corporate offices and operational center. The building, a 21,675 square foot free standing structure, was purchased for $2,700,000 from Core Development Holdings Corporation, which entity has no relationship to the Company.

Interconnection Leasing Agreements

The Company will be entering into lease arrangements to provide interconnection services in multiple states.  “Interconnection services” is defined in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “Telecommunications Act”) as the linking of two telecommunication systems so that users of either system may utilize the system components of the other. Pursuant to the FCC rules implementing the Telecommunications Act, we negotiate interconnection agreements with incumbent local exchange carriers to obtain access to facilities. Facilities leasing occurs where one network service provider leases the facilities of another network service provider to provide services to end users. We currently have executed two interconnection leasing agreements and are negotiating an interconnection leasing agreement with other major hosting/bandwidth companies. Our current interconnection leasing agreements are with multiple carriers. The agreements relate to facilities located or to be located in the following states:

The agreements will grant us interconnection leasing rights in all thirty five states in which we have obtained or are pursuing a CLEC license. If we enter new markets, we expect to establish interconnection agreements with incumbent local exchange carriers on an individual state basis, as the need arises.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Part II

Item 5.  Market for registrant’s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity

Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “NTLK” since September 15, 2009. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid prices of our common stock.  These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

Holders

As of December 31, 2011, there were 95 registered holders or persons otherwise entitled to hold our common stock.  The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Fidelity Transfer.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain information about the common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options under the equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011.

2010 Stock Option Plan

On November 15, 2009, Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2010 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives and thereby better aligning the interests of such persons with those of the Company’s shareholders. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provides bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On July 26, 2010, May 23, 2011 and July 26, 2011, we issued 3,709,500, 3,890,000 and 2,400,500 shares of common stock to our employees as part of our 2010 Stock Option Plan, respectively.  The shares are compensatory in nature and are fully vested.  We have valued the shares at $0.03, $0.01 and $0.01 per share for the July 26, 2010, May 23, 2011 and July 26, 2011 issuances consistent with the fair value at the time of issuance including and adjusted for ownership restrictions.

July 26, 2010 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

May 23, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

July 26, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

Summary of 2010 Stock Option Plan:

We have issued all approved common shares of our 2010 Stock Option Plan.

2011 Stock Option Plan

On June 15, 2011, Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2011 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives and thereby better aligning the interests of such persons with those of the Company’s shareholders. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provides bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Unless otherwise noted, the issuances noted below are all considered exempt from registration by reason of     Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 6. Selected financial data.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to include disclosure, pursuant to this item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking   statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections of future events. However, our actual results could differ materially from those discussed herein as a result of the risks that we face, including but not limited to those risks stated in ”Risk Factors," or faulty assumptions on our part. In addition, the following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Background

Prior to September 10, 2008, we were engaged in the development of advertising services and strategies. On September 10, 2008, our management and Board of Directors committed to the discontinuance and disposal of our advertising business. We disposed of this asset to be able to concentrate our efforts exclusively on the deployment of our VOIP products.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have prepared our financial statements as a going concern.  During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we generated net losses of $3,440,286 and $1,227,549, respectively. We used cash in our operations in the amounts of $2,036,921 and 1,340,545 during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

As of December 31, 2011, we had cash on hand of $1,589,263.

Our largest operating expenditures currently consist of the following items: $26,050 per month on leasing our corporate office space and network operational center (NOC) and includes our base rent and associated utility expenses and $200,000 per month on payroll.

Our current long term business plan contemplates acquiring the ongoing business of related companies, either through asset acquisitions, consolidations or mergers. 

Borrowing Arrangements

Long-term and short term debt

The carrying values of our long term and short term debt consisted of the following as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010:

Conversion of Convertible Debentures:

On June 30, 2011, the holders of our 12% secured convertible debentures converted the debentures with a total face value of $4,998,773 for an aggregate of 19,995,092 shares of common stock, which was in accordance with the contractual conversion price of $0.25.

The outstanding short and long term debt is secured by a lien of all our assets.

The following constitute events of default under the secured long-term debt held by Vicis Capital Master Fund: (i) failure to pay any interest or principal payment when due; (ii) failure to observe any covenant contained in the secured debenture or the purchase agreement that we executed in connection with the issuance of the secured debenture; (iii) the occurrence of an event of default by us under any other material agreement or lease; (iv) entry of a judgment against us in excess of $150,000; and (v) the appointment of a receiver, the filing of bankruptcy by us, or if we otherwise become insolvent. Additionally, if we seek to prepay the secured debentures, we must pay a prepayment penalty equal to 110% of the then outstanding principal, plus all other amounts due.

The secured debentures contain negative covenants that prohibit us from taking certain corporate actions without the prior written consent of the holder of the secured debentures, Vicis Capital Master Fund. We cannot take the following actions without Vicis Capital Master Funds’ consent while the secured debentures remain outstanding:   (i) incur any additional indebtedness or allow any lien to be filed against our assets, except in certain limited instances; (ii) amend our articles of incorporation or bylaws in a manner that adversely effects the holder of our secured debentures; (iii) repay, repurchase or otherwise acquire more than a de minimis number of shares of our common stock or common stock equivalents from any security holder, except in certain limited instances; (iv) enter into any transactions with our executive officers, directors or affiliates; (v) increase our executive officers’ salary or bonus more than 15% from what was paid in the previous year; or (vi) pay cash dividends or distributions on any of our equity security. We are currently in compliance with all restrictive covenants.

Results of Operations

Comparison – period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Revenues: Our operating revenue amounted to $1,298,623 and $470,374 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The increase in revenues relates to increase in sales to large retail customers and increase sales volume during the period ended December 31, 2011.

Cost of sales: Our cost of sales amounted to $1,787,815 and $724,988 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in cost of sales relates to increased sales to large retail customers and increasing sales volume during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Advertising:  Our advertising expenses amounted to $606,209 and $109,996 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The breakdown of our advertising expense is as follows:

Compensation and Benefits: Our compensation and benefits expense amounted to $289,652 and $104,750 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.  This amount represents normal salaries and wages paid to management members and employees. The increase is due to the addition of employees in our development, engineering and operations departments. Total employees increased from 35 at December 31, 2010 to 52 at December 31, 2011.

Professional Fees: Our professional fees amounted to $136,118 and $68,094 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This amount includes normal payments and accruals for legal, accounting and other professional services related to general business and being a public company.

Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization amounted to $60,765 and $90,033 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.  These amounts represent amortization of our long-lived tangible and intangible assets using the straight-line method and lives commensurate with the assets’ remaining utility. Our long-lived assets, both tangible and intangible, are subject to annual impairment review, or more frequently if circumstances so warrant. During the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we did not calculate or record impairment charges, however, negative trends in our business and our inability to meet our projected future results could give rise to impairment charges in future periods.

Research and Development and Software Costs

We expense research and development expenses, as these costs are incurred. We account for our offering-related software development costs as costs incurred internally in creating a computer software product and are charged to expense when incurred as research and development until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program design or, in its absence, completion of a working model.  At this time our main products, the DUO are being sold in the market place.  Therefore, research and development cost reported in our financial statements relates to pre – marketing cost and are expensed accordingly.

General, Selling and Administrative Expenses: General, selling and administrative expenses amounted to $497,986 for the period ended December 31, 2011 as compared to $184,282 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and consisted of general corporate expenses, as follows:

Loss from operations: Loss from operations amounted to $2,350,704 and $997,327 for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The increase in net loss resulted primarily from an increase in payroll and advertising expense to sustain our growth in the retail segment and support awareness of the Company’s products. .

Interest Expense: Interest expense amounted to $1,090,735 for the period ended December 31, 2011 as compared to $126,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Such amount represented (i) stipulated interest under our aggregate $4,998,773 face value convertible debentures that were converted to common stock during the year and our secured debentures issued on August 8, 2011, (ii) the related amortization of premiums and discounts  (iii) the amortization of deferred finance costs.  Aggregate premiums continue to be credited to interest expense over the term of the debentures using the effective interest method.

Derivative Income (Expense): Derivative income (expense) amounted to $0.0 for the period ended December 31, 2011 as compared to derivative income (expense) of $(105,778) for the year ended December 31, 2010. Such amount represents the change in fair value of liability-classified warrants. Derivative financial instruments are carried as liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements with changes reflected in income. In addition to the liability-classified warrants, we also had certain compound derivative financial instruments related to our $4,998,773 face value convertible debentures that had de minimis values. We are required to adjust our warrant and compound derivatives to fair value at each reporting period. The fair value of our warrant derivative is largely based upon fluctuations in the fair value of our common stock. The fair value of our compound derivative is largely based upon estimates of cash flow arising from the derivative and credit-risk adjusted interest rates. Accordingly, the volatility in these underlying valuation assumptions will have future effects on our earnings.

Net Loss: Net loss amounted to $3,440,286 for the period ended December 31, 2011, as compared to a net loss of $1,227,549 for the period ended December 31, 2010.

Net Loss Per Common Share: Basic loss per common share represents our net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share gives effect to all potentially dilutive securities. We compute the effects on diluted loss per common share arising from warrants and options using the treasury stock method. Applying this method, 80,942,305 and 20,000,000 shares indexed to warrants and convertible preferred stock, respectively were excluded from our computation because the effect was anti-dilutive. We computed the effects on diluted loss per common share arising from convertible securities using the if-converted method. The effects, if anti-dilutive are excluded.

Contractual obligations

Our principal executive offices are located at 1100 NW 163rd Drive, Miami, Florida 33169.  Our offices consist of approximately 3,500 square feet. Our lease was extended on June 1^st, 2011 for a term of 1 year, terminating on May 31, 2012. The facility is suitable for our purposes and is expected to accommodate our needs until we move all company operations to our newly purchased building. Rent and associated occupancy expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $78,436 and $54,215 respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None

Critical Accounting Policies and estimates

Our accounting policies are discussed and summarized in Note 1 to our financial statements.  The following describes our critical accounting policies and estimates.

Critical Accounting Policies

The financial information contained in our comparative results of operations and liquidity disclosures has been derived from our financial statements. The preparation of those financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and notes. The following significant estimates were made in the preparation of our financial statements and should be considered when reading our Management’s Discussion and Analysis:

Revenue recognition

We derive revenue from (i) product sales and (ii) telecom services. All revenues are recognized in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition and SAB 104 as follows: when evidence of an arrangement exists, in the case of products, when the product is shipped to a customer, or in the case of telecom services, when the service is used by the consumer, when the fee is fixed or determinable and finally when we have concluded that amounts are collectible from the customers. Shipping costs billed to customers are included as a component of product sales. The associated cost of shipping is included as a component of cost of product sales.

Operating revenue consist of customer equipment sales of our main product the NetTalk DUO (“DUO”), telecommunication service revenues, shipping and handling revenues.

On July 14, 2010 we revealed our newest product the net TALK DUO (“DUO”).

Our DUO offers our customers free nationwide calls to any landline or mobile phone in the U.S. and Canada from anywhere in the world, as well as low-cost international rates.  It’s also a versatile digital phone service with no monthly fees, no contracts and no computer required.

Our DUO is flexible enough to connect directly to your Internet connection through the router/modem, there is also a convenient option with our DUO to connect to your computer. The sleek design is small enough to fit in the palm of your hand, making it a portable device.

Our DUO reduces the wear and tear on your home or office computer and reduces energy costs, resulting in money savings. Our fax-friendly DUO, offers fax (incoming and outgoing), a unique feature not offered, to our knowledge, by similar digital phone services.

The portability of this small device is also great for international travelers who want to place free nationwide calls to the U.S. and Canada, or who are looking for a low-cost solution for international rates. Calls to other netTALK customers are always free.

Our DUO provides for revenue recognition from the sale of the device and from the sale of telephone service. The initial year of telephone service is included on the sale price at time of sale and billed subsequently thereafter. Therefore, revenue recognition on our DUO is fully recognized at the time of our customer equipment sale, the one year telephone service is amortized over 12 month cycle.  Subsequent renewals of the annual telephone service are amortized over the corresponding 12 months cycle.

International calls are billed as earned from our customers.  International calls are prepaid and customers account is debited as minutes are used and earned.

Inventory

Inventory consists of the cost of customer equipment and is stated at the lower of cost or market.

At the present time we do not provide for inventory allowance.  As we continue to sell our product we will evaluate the need for such an allowance.

During the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, in accordance with our lower of cost or market analyses we did not recorded any lower of cost or market adjustments to our finished goods inventories.

Of our $1,019,339 of finished goods inventory, $170,402 of it is held on consignment at one of our distributors.

Income taxes

We recognized deferred taxes for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using tax rates in effect for the year since the differences are expected to reverse.  We have recorded a valuation allowance on the assumption that we will not have any future taxable income.

Net operating loss carry-forwards

As of December 31, 2011, we had net operating loss carry-forwards in the amount of $14,026,686 for US federal and state tax purposes expiring at various times from thru 2031.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued an update that amends the guidance provided in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, by clarifying some existing concepts, eliminating wording differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changing some principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The update results in a consistent definition of fair value, establishes common requirements for the measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS, and expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This update becomes effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”). The Codification is the single source for all authoritative Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied for financial statements issued for periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification does not change GAAP and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 8. Financial Statement and Supplementary Data

The financial statements begin on Page F-1.

Item 9. Changes In and  Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

As of December 31, 2011, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified for each report and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following control deficiencies that represent material weaknesses at December 31, 2011:

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system to insure that information required to be disclosed in this annual report on Form 10-K has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately.  Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem, and intends to developed procedures to address them to the extent possible given limitations in financial and manpower resources.   While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented.  

Management report on internal control over financial reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financing reporting for our company.  Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15(f) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by or under the supervision of our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not detect or prevent misstatements.  Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in internal control – integrated framework. Based on our assessment, management concluded that as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting is not effective based on those criteria.

In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following control deficiencies that represent material weaknesses at December 31, 2011:

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system to insure that information required to be disclosed in this annual report on Form 10-K has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately.  Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem, and intends to developed procedures to address them to the extent possible given limitations in financial and manpower resources.   While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented.  Failure to develop adequate internal control and hiring of qualified accounting personnel may result in a “material weakness” in the Company’s internal control relating to the above activities.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Changes in Internal Controls.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (f) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9 B.  Other Information

2011 Stock Option Plan

On June 15, 2011, Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2011 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives and thereby better aligning the interests of such persons with those of the Company’s shareholders. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provides bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On January 6, 2012 we issued 3,408,500 shares of common stock to our employees as part of our 2011 Stock Option Plan. The shares are compensatory in nature and are fully vested.  We have valued the shares at $0.01 per share consistent with the fair value at the time of issuance including and adjusted for ownership restrictions.

July 26, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

Part III

Item 10. Directors, executive officers and corporate governance

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each of our directors, executive officers and key employees as of December 31, 2011. Their ages, positions, dates of initial election or appointment, and the expiration of their terms are as follows:

Unless expressly indicated in the above table, each director and officer will serve in these capacities until their successors are duly elected, qualified and seated in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.

Background of Executive Officers and Directors

Anastasios Kyriakides, Director, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary. Mr. Kyriakides has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors and as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Secretary since September 2008. Mr. Kyriakides received a Bachelor of Science in business from Florida International University in 1975. In 1977, he received a degree in investment banking from the American Institute of Banking. From 1979 until present, Mr. Kyriakides has consulted for numerous companies in the areas of shipping, travel, banking and electronics. Mr. Kyriakides began his career in the electronics development field when, in 1979, he founded and served as Chairman of Lexicon Corporation, producer of the LK300, the first hand held electronic language translator which translated words and phrases into 12 different languages. Lexicon was publicly traded on the NASDAQ, under the symbol LEXI, until it was ultimately acquired by Nixdorf Computers of Germany. Mr. Kyriakides was also the founder of Delcor Industries, established in 1980 in Hollywood, Florida. Delcor was an electronics manufacturing facility employing over 150 employees to assemble OEM products for various electronics companies including IBM mainframe and Gable Division. In 1983, Mr. Kyriakides founded the Mylex Corporation to develop and produce the world’s first hand-held optical scanner and VGA card for personal computers. As the President and Chairman, Mr. Kyriakides guided Mylex from its beginning as a private company to its becoming a public company traded on the NASDAQ under the stock symbol MYLX until it was acquired as a wholly owned subsidiary of IBM (NYSE: IBM). In 1983, Mr. Kyriakides was the founder and Chairman of Tower Bank NA, a full service commercial bank, with three offices, headquartered in Dade County, Florida. Mr. Kyriakides also has extensive experience in the cruise line and travel industries. His cruise ship career started with Carnival Cruise line out of the Port of Miami, and continued to a successful start up with Tropicana Cruises; one of the first gaming ships out of the Port of Miami. Mr. Kyriakides founded Regency Cruise Line in 1984, as the world’s first publicly traded company in passenger shipping, and served as its Chairman and Secretary until 1987. Mr. Kyriakides also organized the successful start-up of Seawind Cruise Line. In his three years with Seawind Cruise Line, Mr. Kyriakides served as its founder, chairman, chief executive officer and secretary.

From 1994 to 1996, Mr. Kyriakides served as the Chairman of Montgomery Ward Travel, a company created to provide full travel services to eight million Montgomery Ward customers and credit card holders. Immediately prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kyriakides served as Chief Executive Officer of Interlink Global Corporation from 1994 until September, 2008. Interlink Global Corporation provided telecommunications applications utilizing hardware and software that enables its domestic and worldwide users to access the internet as a transmission medium for placing telephone calls.

Kenneth Hosfeld, Director, Vice President. Mr. Hosfeld was appointed to serve on the Company’s board of directors in September 2008. Mr. Hosfeld has over twenty-two years of international sales, marketing, and business management experience in the telecommunications industry. Most recently, Mr. Hosfeld served as a member of the board of directors and the executive vice president for Interlink Global Corporation (OTC: ILKG), a provider of private and public telecommunication network and internet services. Prior to joining Interlink, Mr. Hosfeld co-founded NetExpress. He has also served as the Regional Director of Brazil, the Andinos, and the Caribbean for Tellabs, Inc., a global supplier to the dynamic telecommunications industry that designs, manufactures, markets and services voice, data a video transportation tools and networks. While with Tellabs, Mr. Hosfeld secured that company’s first “turn-key” contract which involved a complete, fully managed network deployment including all products and services and project financing. He also opened Tellabs’ offices in Brazil and regularly exceeded revenue targets. Prior to that, Kenneth was Vice President of Nera Latin America, a subsidiary of Nera Telecommunications (formerly ABB), a telecommunications and IT solutions provider for microwave, satellite, wireless broadband access, networking and broadcasting. Mr. Hosfeld had full production and logistic responsibility for the Latin American region, including responsibilities for opening offices throughout Latin America including such countries as Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela, While with the company, Mr. Hosfeld was also able to penetrate the Mexican and Chilean markets. Prior to his work with Nera Latin America, Mr. Hosfeld was responsible for similar product sales in Africa and in China. Mr. Hosfeld speaks over six languages including fluent Spanish and Portuguese. Immediately prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hosfeld served as Executive Vice President of Interlink Global Corporation from 1994 until September, 2008. Interlink Global Corporation provided telecommunications applications utilizing hardware and software that enables its domestic and worldwide users to access the internet as a transmission medium for placing telephone calls.

Guillermo Rodriguez, Director, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Rodriguez was appointed to the Company’s board of directors in September 2008. Mr. Rodriguez was a certified public accountant. He earned his Bachelor’s Degree with a major in accounting and business administration from the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida. Mr. Rodriguez earned his Masters of Business Administration from Nova Southeastern University in Davie, Florida. He has extensive accounting and financial reporting experience in banking, real estate brokering, property management and the telecommunications industry. Prior to joining the Company in September 2008, Mr. Rodriguez worked for Interlink Global Corporation from 2005 until September 2008 and as controller and financial officer for Land Cellular Corporation from 2003 until 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Rodriguez served as controller and financial officer for Bremer Real Estate, CSW Associates and Consolidated Bank, N.A. Mr. Rodriguez also worked as an auditor and investigator for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Mr. Rodriguez is fluent in Spanish.

Dr. George Gabb, Director.

Mr. Gabb has over 18 years of experience within the education field. Currently he oversees the Computer Information Systems department at Miami Dade College North Campus (“MDC”), covering a wide variety of programming languages. Mr. Gabb has been with MDC since 1998 and has a total of 18 years of experience within the education field. Prior to his stay at MDC, he held a variety of Director-level academic IT-related positions. In addition to his academic background, Mr. Gabb is a member of the Florida Bar. He holds a B.S. in Psychology, M.S. in Computer Information Systems, and a J.D. from Nova Southeastern University.

Significant employees

Other than the executive officers named above, the Company does not have any “significant employees.”

Family relationship

None.

 Involvement in legal proceedings

No officer, director, promoter or significant employee has been involved in the last five years in any of the following:

Committees

Our business, property and affairs are managed by or under the direction of the board of directors. Members of the board are kept informed of our business through discussion with the chief executive and financial officers and other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating at meetings of the board and its committees. We presently do not have any committees of our board of directors, however, our board of directors intends to establish various committees at some point in the near future.

 Employment Agreements

On May 6, 2009, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Anastasios N. Kyriakides (the “Kyriakides Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Kyriakides agreed to continue his service as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company through May 5, 2012. On May 16, 2011, the employment agreement was amended to extend Mr. Kyriakides current service period for a three year period, ending May 16, 2014 with an automatic two year renewal, increase his salary to $250,000 starting January 1, 2012 and include a change of control clause which requires a cash payment of $1,500,000 if a change in control within the Company occurs.

Under the pre-revised Kyriakides Employment Agreement, Mr. Kyriakides’ base salary was $150,000 per annum, subject to annual increases at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Still applicable from the pre-revised agreement are the following:Mr. Kyriakides is (a) eligible for an annual performance based cash bonus up to a maximum annual award of $112,500 to be determined based upon profitability of the Company, (b) eligible to receive a onetime award on May 5, 2012 of shares of common stock having a maximum value of up to $168,750 to be determined based upon profitability of the Company during the 3 year period ending on May 5, 2012, (c) entitled to receive health benefits and life insurance coverage, (d) entitled to receive a monthly car allowance not to exceed $500 a month, (e) eligible to receive other stock grants and/or options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in amounts and upon terms as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time The Kyriakides Employment Agreement may be terminated by the Board of Directors at any time for cause, provided that Mr. Kyriakides receives notice of such termination and fails to cure the alleged breach. Upon termination by the Company without cause or resignation by Mr. Kyriakides for good reason, Mr. Kyriakides is entitled to receive his base salary, as severance, for a 12 month period.

On May 16, 2011, we executed an Amended Employment Agreement with Mr. Kyriakides our Chief Executive Officer and President as follows:

Salary set at $199,000 per year and $250,000 starting on January 1, 2012.

Three year term with automatic renewal of two years.

Change of control cash payment set at $1,500,000

Currently, with the exception of Mr. Kyriakides Employment Agreement, all other employment with the Company is at will and may be terminated by either the employee or the Company at any time. We require each of our three executive officers to execute a Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of change in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of our company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, we believe that during the year ended September 30, 2011, our executive officers, directors and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities have complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted and previously filed a Code of Ethics for our officers, directors and employees.

Item 11. Executive compensation

Compensation of our executive officers

The following table contains compensation information for our executive officers for the period ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. No other officer received compensation greater than $100,000 for either fiscal year. All of the information included in this table reflects compensation earned by the individuals for services rendered to our Company and all references in the following tables to stock awards relate to awards of common stock granted by us.

All amounts reflected in this table are from October 1 to December 31, 2011 and 2010 accordingly.

All amounts reflected in this table are from October 1 to December 31, 2011 and 2010 accordingly.

All amounts reflected in this table are from October 1 to December 31, 2011 and 2010 accordingly.

Overview

The following is a discussion of our program for compensating our named executive officers and directors. Currently, we do not have a compensation committee, and as such, our board of directors is responsible for determining the compensation of our named executive officers. The primary goal of our executive compensation policy is to attract and retain the most talented and loyal executives possible. Our intent is to ensure that our executives are compensated effectively in a manner consistent with our strategy and competitive practice and to align executive compensation with the achievement of our short and long term business objectives.

 Our board of directors considers a variety of factors in determining compensation of executives including the executive’s background, training and prior work experience.

Elements of executive compensation

Our compensation program for the named executive officers consists primarily of base salary. There is no bonus plan, retirement plan, long-term incentive plan or other such plans. The base salary we provide is intended to equitably compensate the named executive officers based upon their level of responsibility, complexity and implementation of our business plan.

2010 Stock Option Plan

On November 15, 2009, Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2010 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives and thereby better aligning the interests of such persons with those of the Company’s shareholders. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provides bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

2010 Stock option plan (Share-based payments employees):

On July 26, 2010, May 23, 2011 and July 26, 2011 we issued 3,709,500, 3,890,000 and 2,400,000 shares of common stock to our employees as part of our 2010 Stock Option Plan.  We have issued all approved common shares under our 2010 Stock Option Plan.

The shares are compensatory in nature and are fully vested.  We have valued the shares at $0.03, $0.01 and $0.01, respectively per share consistent with fair value at the time of issuance including and adjusted for ownership restrictions.

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

May 23, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

July 26, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

We have issued all approved common shares under our 2010 Stock Option Plan.

2011 Stock Option Plan

On June 15, 2011, Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2011 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives and thereby better aligning the interests of such persons with those of the Company’s shareholders. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provides bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Compensation of Directors

None of the Company’s directors have received any additional cash or equity remuneration since inception for their services as Directors except for Dr. George Gabb, one of the Company’s Board of Directors, who received 75,000 shares of stock valued at $563 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2011 with respect to the beneficial ownership of the outstanding common stock by (i) any holder of more than five (5%) percent; (ii) each of our executive officers and directors; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned.

Item 13. Certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence

There were no transactions since the beginning of our last fiscal year, and there are no proposed transactions, that involve amounts in excess of $120,000 to which we were or are to become a party in which any director, executive officer, beneficial owner of more than five (5%) percent of our common stock, or members of their immediate families had, or is to have, a direct or indirect material interest.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The Company's board of directors reviews and approves audit and permissible non-audit services performed by its independent accountants, as well as the fees charged for such services. In its review of non-audit service fees and its appointment of  Meeks International, LLC. as the Company's independent accountants, the board of directors considered whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining independence. All of the services provided and fees charged by Meeks International, LLC. were approved by the board of directors.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of the annual financial statements of the Company and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for 2011 and 2010 were $35,812 and $29,000 respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no other fees billed by during the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements and not reported under "Audit Fees" above.

Tax Fees

There were no fees paid for tax or consulting services for the three month period ended December 31, 2011 or 2010.

All Other Fees

There were no other fees billed during the last three years for products and services provided.

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits, financial statement schedules

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.   Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Anastasios Kyriakides or either of them acting in the absence of the other as his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

NetTalk.com, Inc.

Miami, Florida

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of NetTalk.com, Inc as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 and the related statement of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NetTalk.com, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, and the results of their operations, changes in their stockholders’ deficit and their cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2011 , in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Meeks International, LLC.

Tampa, Florida

March 19, 2012 

Net Talk.com, Inc.

Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

Net Talk.com, Inc.

Statements of Operations

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

Net Talk.com, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

NetTalk.com, Inc.

Statement of Stockholders' Deficit

NET TALK.COM, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1 – Nature of operations and basis of presentation

Net Talk.com, Inc. (“Nettalk” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 1, 2006 under the laws of the State of Florida. We are a telephone company, who provides, sells and supplies commercial and residential telecommunication services, including services utilizing voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) technology, session initiation protocol (“SIP”) technology, wireless fidelity technology, wireless maximum technology, marine satellite services technology and other similar type technologies. Our main products are the DUO and DUO WIFI, both analog telephone adapters that provides connectivity for analog telephones and faxes to home, home office or corporate local area networks (“LAN”). The DUO WIFI can connect to an internet hotspot without the use of an Ethernet cable. Our DUO and DUO WIFI and their related services are a cost effective solution for individuals, small businesses and telecommuters connecting to any analog telephone, fax or private branch exchange (“PBX”).  Our DUO and DUO WIFI provide one USB port, one Ethernet port and one analog telephone port. The DUO WIFI offers an additional wireless chip that allows it to connect to internet hotspots without the use of an Ethernet cable. A full suite of internet protocol features is available to maximize universal connectivity. In addition, analog telephones attached to our DUO and DUO WIFI are able to use advanced calling features such as call forwarding, caller ID, 3-way calling, call holding, call retrieval and call transfer.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and footnotes. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include developing fair value measurements upon which to base our accounting for acquisitions of intangible assets and issuances of financial instruments, including our common stock. Our estimates also include developing useful lives for our tangible and intangible assets and cash flow projections upon which we determine the existence of, or the measurements for, impairments. In all instances, estimates are made by competent employees under the supervision of management, based upon the current circumstances and the best information available.

Risk and Uncertainties

Our future results of operations and financial condition will be impacted by the following factors, among others: dependence on the worldwide telecommunication markets characterized by intense competition and rapidly changing technology, on third-party manufacturers and subcontractors, on third-party distributors in certain markets, on the successful development and marketing of new products in new and existing markets. Generally, we are unable to predict the future status of these areas of risk and uncertainty.

Revenue recognition

We derive revenue from (i) product sales and (ii) telecom services. All revenues are recognized in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition and SAB 104 as follows: when evidence of an arrangement exists, in the case of products, when the product is shipped to a customer, or in the case of telecom services, when the service is used by the consumer, when the fee is fixed or determinable and finally when we have concluded that amounts are collectible from the customers. Shipping costs billed to customers are included as a component of product sales. The associated cost of shipping is included as a component of cost of product sales.

Operating revenue consist of customer equipment sales of our main product the NetTalk DUO (“DUO”), telecommunication service revenues and shipping and handling revenues.

On July 14, 2010 we revealed our newest product the net TALK DUO (“DUO”).

Our DUO offers our customers free nationwide calls to any landline or mobile phone in the U.S. and Canada from anywhere in the world, as well as low-cost international rates.  It’s also a versatile digital phone service with no monthly fees, no contracts and no computer required.

Our DUO is flexible enough to connect directly to your Internet connection through the router/modem, there is also a convenient option with our DUO to connect to your computer. The sleek design is small enough to fit in the palm of your hand, making it a portable device.

Our DUO reduces the wear and tear on your home or office computer and reduces energy costs, resulting in money savings. Our fax-friendly DUO, offers fax (incoming and outgoing), a unique feature not offered, to our knowledge, by similar digital phone services.

The portability of this small device is also great for international travelers who want to place free nationwide calls to the U.S. and Canada, or who are looking for a low-cost solution for international rates. Calls to other netTALK customers are always free.

Our DUO provides for revenue recognition from the sale of the device and from the sale of telephone service. The initial year of telephone service is included on the sale price at time of sale and billed subsequently thereafter. Therefore, revenue recognition on our DUO is fully recognized at the time of our customer equipment sale, the one year telephone service is amortized over 12 month cycle.  Subsequent renewals of the annual telephone service are amortized over the corresponding 12 months cycle.

International calls are billed as earned from our customers.  International calls are prepaid and customers account is debited as minutes are used and earned.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid cash balances and debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We maintain cash balances only in domestic bank accounts, which at times, may exceed FDIC limits. Our cash balances exceeded the FDIC limits by $751,363 and $3,250,210 at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, respectively.

Inventory

Inventories are recorded at cost or market, whichever is lower.

During the three months period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, in accordance with our lower of cost or market analyses we did not recorded any lower of cost or market adjustments to our finished goods inventories.

Of our $1,019,339 of finished goods inventory, $170,402 of it is held on consignment at one of our distributors.

Telecommunications Equipment and Other Property

Property, equipment and telecommunication equipment includes acquired assets which consist of network equipment, computer hardware, furniture and software. All of our equipments are stated at cost with depreciation calculated using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of related assets, which ranges from three to five years.  The cost associated with  major improvements are capitalized while the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to operating expenses.

Intangible Assets

Our intangible assets were recorded at our acquisition cost, which encompassed estimates of their respective and their relative fair values, as well as estimates of the fair value of consideration that we issued. We amortize our intangible assets using the straight-line method over lives that are predicated on contractual terms or over periods we believe the assets will have utility.

Impairments and Disposals

We evaluate our tangible and definite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently in the presence of circumstances or trends that may be indicators of impairment. Our evaluation is a two step process. The first step is to compare our undiscounted cash flows, as projected over the remaining useful lives of the assets, to their respective carrying values. In the event that the carrying values are not recovered by future undiscounted cash flows, as a second step, we compare the carrying values to the related fair values and, if lower, record an impairment adjustment. For purposes of fair value, we generally use replacement costs for tangible fixed assets and discounted cash flows, using risk-adjusted discount rates for intangible assets.

Research and Development and Software Costs

We expense research and development costs, as these costs are incurred. We account for our offering-related software development costs as costs incurred internally in creating a computer software product and are charged to expense when incurred as research and development until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detail program design or, in its absence, completion of a working model. Thereafter, all software production costs shall be capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and future revenue for each product with an annual minimum equal to the straight-line amortization over the remaining estimated economic life of the product.   At this time our main product the NetTalk DUO is being sold in the market place through both Ecommerce and Brick and Mortar retail establishments.  We plan on rolling out our DUO WIFI in February of 2012. Therefore, research and development cost reported in our financial statements relates to pre – marketing costs of our DUO WIFI and other products we are currently working on and preparing for release in the market place. Research and development costs are expensed accordingly.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years financial statements in order to conform to the current year’s presentation.  The reclassification had no impact on net earnings previously reported.

 Share-Based Payment Arrangements

In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the treatment of participating securities in the calculation of earnings per shares (“EPS”).  This guidance addresses whether instruments granted in share – based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing EPS under the two - class method.  This guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning on December 15, 2008.  Adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position, or on basic or diluted EPS.

We apply the grant date fair value method to our share – based payment arrangements with employees  and consultants.  Share – based compensation cost to employees is measured at the grant date fair value based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period.  Share – based payments to non – employees are recorded at fair value on the measurement date and reflected in expense over the service period.

2010 Stock Option Plan

On November 15, 2009, Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2010 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives and thereby better aligning the interests of such persons with those of the Company’s shareholders. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provides bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

2010 Stock option plan (Share-based payments employees):

On July 26, 2010, May 23, 2011 and July 26, 2011 we issued 3,709,500, 3,890,000 and 2,400,500 shares of common stock to our employees as part of our 2010 Stock Option Plan.  We have issued all approved common shares under our 2010 Stock Option Plan.

The shares are compensatory in nature and are fully vested.  We have valued the shares at $0.03, $0.01 and $0.01, respectively per share consistent with fair value at the time of issuance including and adjusted for ownership restrictions.

July 26, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

May 23, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

July 26, 2011 Issuance

The shares were issued to officers and employees, as follows:

We have issued all approved common shares under our 2010 Stock Option Plan.

2011 Stock Option Plan

On June 15, 2011, Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the 2011 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which is intended to advance the interests of the Company’s shareholders by enhancing the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing such persons with equity ownership opportunities and performance-based incentives and thereby better aligning the interests of such persons with those of the Company’s shareholders. All of the Company’s employees, officers, and directors, and those Company’s consultants and advisors (i) that are natural persons and (ii) who provides bona fide services to the Company not connected to a capital raising transaction or the promotion or creation of a market for the company’s securities, are eligible to be granted options or restricted stock awards under the Plan. The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 30,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Financial Instruments

Financial instruments, as defined in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825 Financial Instruments, consist of cash, evidence of ownership in an entity, and contracts that both (i) impose on one entity a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial instrument to a second entity, or to exchange other financial instruments on potentially unfavorable terms with the second entity, and (ii) conveys to that second entity a contractual right (a) to receive cash or another financial instrument from the first entity, or (b) to exchange other financial instruments on potentially favorable terms with the first entity. Accordingly, our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, secured convertible debentures, and derivative financial instruments.

We carry cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities at historical costs since their respective estimated fair values approximate carrying values due to their current nature. We also carry convertible debentures and redeemable preferred stock at historical cost.

Derivative financial instruments, as defined in ASC 815-10-15-83 Derivatives and Hedging, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.

Certain risks and concentration

Our manufacturing partner accounted for approximately 35% of our cost of goods sold and 19% of outstanding accounts payable at period ended December 31, 2011 comparable amounts for period ended December 31, 2010 were 27% of cost of goods sold and 15% of outstanding accounts payables.

One of our customers presently operates under a “Consignment Agreement”, under the agreement we sell and ship merchandise to our customer and we collect payments upon final sale of our product to the ultimate (final) consumer.

Redeemable Preferred Stock

Redeemable preferred stock (and other redeemable financial instrument we may enter into) is initially evaluated for possible classification as liabilities under ASC 480 Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. Redeemable preferred stock classified as liabilities is recorded and carried at fair value. Redeemable preferred stock that does not, in its entirety, require liability classification is evaluated for embedded features that may require bifurcation and separate classification as derivative liabilities under ASC 815. In all instances, the classification of the redeemable preferred stock host contract that does not require liability classification is evaluated for equity classification or mezzanine classification based upon the nature of the redemption features. Generally, any feature that could require cash redemption for matters not within our control, irrespective of probability of the event occurring, requires classification outside of stockholders’ equity. See Note 7 for further disclosures about our redeemable preferred stock.

Loss per common share

Basic loss per common share represents our loss applicable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share gives effect to all potentially dilutive securities. We compute the effects on diluted loss per common share arising from warrants and options using the treasury stock method or, in the case of liability classified warrants, the reverse treasury stock method. We compute the effects on diluted loss per common share arising from convertible securities using the if-converted method. The effects, if anti-dilutive are excluded.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued an update that amends the guidance provided in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, by clarifying some existing concepts, eliminating wording differences between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changing some principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The update results in a consistent definition of fair value, establishes common requirements for the measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS, and expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This update becomes effective in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”). The Codification is the single source for all authoritative Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied for financial statements issued for periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification does not change GAAP and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 3 – Building, Telecommunications Equipment, Land and Other Property:

Our telecommunications equipment is deployed in our Network Operations Center (“NOC”) as is most of the computer equipment. Other computer and office equipment and furnishings are deployed at our corporate offices, which we lease under an operating lease. Depreciation of the above assets amounted to $43,992 and $32,315 for the periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 4 - Intangible Assets:

Amortization of the above intangible assets amounted to $16,773 and $57,718 for period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  

Estimated future amortization of intangible assets for each year ending after December 31, 2011, is as follows:

Note 5 – Secured Convertible Debentures, Secured Long-Term Debentures and Short Term Debt

The carrying values our long-term and short term debt consisted of the following as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011:

Issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures

On August 8, 2011 and September 30, 2011, we issued face value $2,000,000 12% debentures, due July 1, 2013, and face value $3,500,000 10% debentures, due June 30, 2012, respectively, for aggregate cash of $5,500,000. Concurrent with these financing transactions we also issued the investor warrants to purchase an aggregate of 18,000,000 shares of our common stock for $0.50 for periods of five years.

We allocated the gross proceeds from the financing transactions to the debentures and the warrants based upon their relative fair values, as reflected in the following table:

The fair value of the debentures was computed based upon the present value of all future cash flows, using a credit risk adjusted discount rates ranging from 7.63% to 7.86%. This discount rate was developed based upon bond curves of companies with similar high risk credit ratings plus a range of 0.25% to 0.36% risk free rate based upon yields for zero coupon government securities with maturities consistent with those of the debentures. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Binomial Lattice technique. The effective volatility and risk free rates resulting from the calculations were 55.15% — 129.86% and 0.07% — 1.11%, respectively.

On June 30, 2011, we issued face value $5,266,130, 12% debentures, due July 1, 2013 and warrants to purchase 21,064,520 shares of our common stock for $0.50 per share, which expire five years from the issuance date, for $2,500,000 cash, settlement of $2,500,000 in bridge financing and settlement of $266,130 in accrued interest on the former convertible debentures. See discussion on the conversion of the convertible debentures, below. The cash and advance settlement were accounted for as financing transactions. The settlement of the accrued interest was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt.

The debentures were allocated $5,000,000 face value and $266,130 to the financing and extinguishment, respectively. Applying that same relationship, we allocated 20,000,000 and 1,064,520 warrants to the financing and extinguishment, respectively.

We allocated the gross proceeds from the financing transaction to the debentures and the warrants based upon their relative fair values, as reflected in the following table:

The fair value of the debentures was computed based upon the present value of all future cash flows, using a credit risk adjusted discount rate of $7.75%. This discount rate was developed based upon bond curves of companies with similar high risk credit ratings plus a 0.50% risk free rate based upon yields for zero coupon government securities with maturities consistent with those of the debentures. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Binomial Lattice valuation technique. The effective volatility and risk free rate used in the calculation were 113.8% and 1.70%, respectively.

For purposes of the extinguished instrument, we recorded the allocated face value of the debentures and the allocated number of warrants at their fair values. The difference between these amounts and the carrying value of the settled obligation was recorded as an extinguishment loss in our income, as follows:

The fair value of the debentures and the warrants were determined in the same manner as those allocated to the financing and as described above.

The total carrying value of the debentures arising from the financing and the extinguishment transactions amounted to $2,313,774. This discounted balance is subject to amortization through charges to interest expense over the term to maturity using the effective interest method. Amortization will commence on July 1, 2011.

Conversion of Convertible Debentures:

On June 30, 2011, the holders of our secured convertible debentures converted the debentures for an aggregate of 19,995,092 shares of common stock, which was in accordance with the contractual conversion price. On the date of the conversion, the compound embedded derivatives associated with the secured convertible debentures were adjusted to fair value resulting in a credit to derivative income in the amount of $2,514,209. Following the derivative adjustment, the adjusted carrying value of the compound embedded derivative ($8,797,840) and carrying value of the secured convertible notes ($4,998,773) were combined in the amount of $13,776,613 and reclassified to stockholders equity to give effect to the issuance of the common shares.

Further, on the June 30, 2011 conversion date we issued the holders of the secured convertible debentures warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock as conversion inducement consideration. These warrants have a five year term and a strike price of $0.50 per common share. The warrants meet all conditions for equity classification. The fair value of the warrants, determined using the Noreen Wolfson dilution adjustment model for the Black Scholes Merton valuation technique, amounted to $390,800 which has been recorded in expense. The volatility and risk free rate used in the Black Scholes Merton calculation were 113.8% and 1.70%, respectively.

Issuance of Convertible Debentures:

By way of background, our convertible debentures were issued on February 24, 2010 in connection with an exchange agreement with our creditors that provided for, among other things, the consolidation of our previous secured convertible debt instruments, with maturities listed in the table above, and included the capitalization of $798,773 of accrued interest. The newly issued convertible debentures bear interest at 12%, which is payable at the earlier of the maturity date or the date that the debentures are converted, if ever. Such interest is payable at the Company’s option in cash or common stock at $0.25 per common share. The principal amount of the debentures is convertible into common stock at $0.25. Accordingly, the convertible debentures are indexed to 19,995,092 shares of our common stock. Each of the principal and debt conversion rates are subject to adjustment for recapitalization events or sales of equity or equity-linked contracts with a price or conversion price less than the contractual conversion price. The convertible debentures are secured by substantially all of our assets and are either callable or subject to a default interest rate, at the creditor’s option, if we default on the debentures. The significant events that could trigger a default include our failure to service the debentures, bankruptcy and the filing of significant judgments against us. The debentures also preclude merger and similar transactions, incurring additional debt, our payment of dividends on our equity securities and limit the compensation that we may pay to our officers.

Our accounting for the aforementioned exchange transaction required us to consider whether the exchange resulted in a substantial modification to the original convertible debentures based upon either cash flows or the fair value of the embedded conversion feature, wherein substantial is generally defined as a change greater than 10%. In all instances, our calculations indicated that the exchange of convertible debentures resulted in changes that were substantial to either cash flows, the embedded conversion option, or both. As a result, we were required to extinguish the prior debt instruments and reestablish the new convertible debentures at fair value, with the difference reflected in our expenses.

The following table reflects the components of our extinguishment calculations on February 24, 2010:

The fair values of the Secured Convertible Debentures were determined based upon their respective discounted cash flow, using observable market rates, plus the fair value of the embedded conversion options. Observable market rates on the exchange date ranged from 7.91% for one-year and 8.47% for two years and were derived from publicly available surveys of corporate bond curves for issuers with similar risk characteristics as ours. The fair value of our compound embedded derivatives were determined using the Monte Carlo Simulations model. See Note 8. The compound embedded derivatives were adjusted to fair value on the exchange date, immediately before the exchange transaction, which amount is included in our derivative income (expense).

The fair value of the new convertible debentures was allocated to the debt balance, the compound embedded derivative and paid-in capital. Paid-in capital arises in this transaction, because the allocation resulted in premiums which, under accounting principles, are considered equity components. The following table summarizes the allocation on the exchange date:

Our accounting for the original debenture financings is as follows:

2008 Convertible Debenture Financing

On September 10, 2008, we issued a $1,000,000 face value, 12% secured convertible debenture (T-1), due September 10, 2010 and Series B warrants indexed to 4,000,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for the Interlink Asset Group, discussed in Note 3. Also on September 30, 2008, we issued a $500,000 face value 12% secured convertible debenture (T-2), due September 10, 2010 and Series B warrants indexed to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock for net cash proceeds of $472,800. The warrants have a term of five years. These financial instruments were issued to the same creditor under contracts that are substantially similar, unless otherwise mentioned in the following discussion.

The principal amount of the debentures was initially payable on September 10, 2010 and the interest is payable quarterly, on a calendar quarter basis. While the debenture is outstanding, the investor has the option to convert the principal balance, and not the interest, into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.25 per common share. The terms of the conversion option provide for anti-dilution protections for traditional restructurings of our equity, such as stock-splits and reorganizations, if any, and for sales of our common stock, or issuances of common-indexed financial instruments, at amounts below the otherwise fixed conversion price. Further, the terms of the convertible debenture provide for certain redemption features. If, in the event of certain defaults on the terms of the debentures, some of which are indexed to equity risks, we are required at the investors option to pay the higher of (i) 110% of the principal balance, plus accrued interest or (ii) the if-converted value of the underlying common stock, using the 110% default amount, plus accrued interest. If this default redemption is not exercised by the investor, we would incur a default interest rate of 18% and the investor would have rights to our assets under the related Security Agreement. We may redeem the convertible debentures at anytime at 110% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest.

Because the two hybrid debt contracts were issued as compensation for the Interlink Asset Group and as further discussed in Note 3 we concluded that they should be combined for accounting purposes, the accounting resulted in no beneficial conversion feature.

2009 Convertible Debenture Financings

We entered into several Securities Purchase Agreements with Debt Opportunity Fund, LLP (“DOF”) during the year ended September 30, 2009.

On January 30, 2009 we issued (a) 12% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $600,000 with a maturity date of January 30, 2011, convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.25; and (b) Series C Warrants to purchase 2,400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 for net cash proceeds of $507,900. The warrants have a term of five years.

On February 6, 2009 we issued (a) 12% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $500,000 with a maturity date of January 30, 2011, convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.25; and (b) Series C Warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 for net cash proceeds of $443,250. The warrants have a term of five years.

On July 20, 2009, we issued (a) 12% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $500,000 with a maturity date of July 20, 2011, convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.25; and (b) Series C Warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 for net cash proceeds of $446,250. The warrants have a term of five years.

On September 25, 2009, we issued (a) 12% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $1,100,000 with a maturity date of July 20, 2011, convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.25; and (b) Series C Warrants to purchase 4,400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 for net cash proceeds of $1,000,000. The warrants have a term of five years.

Each debenture bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum from the date of issuance until paid in full. Interest is calculated on the basis of a 360-day year and paid for the actual number of days elapsed, and accrues and is payable quarterly or upon conversion (as to the principal amount then being converted). The debentures convert into shares of our common stock at the option of the holder at $0.25 per share (which conversion price is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances). The debentures are secured by a lien in all of the assets of the Company. Further, the terms of the convertible debentures provide for default redemption features similar to those described above.

Midtown Partners & Co., LLC (“Midtown Partners”), an NASD registered broker dealer, acted as the placement agent for the Company in connection with the January 30, July 20, and September 25, 2009 Convertible Debt Offerings (“2009 Convertible Debt Offerings”). We paid Midtown Partners cash commissions equal to $198,000 and we issued Series BD Common Stock Purchase Warrants to Midtown Partners entitling Midtown Partners to purchase 1,720,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.50 per share and 440,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial exercise price $0.25 per share. Since the Series BD warrants offered full ratchet anti-dilution protection, any previously issued and outstanding warrants with a conversion price greater than $0.25 automatically had their conversion price ratchet down to $0.25 as subsequent issuances were made with a conversion price of $0.25.

On September 22, 2009 we voided and reissued warrants in connection with our financing transactions. The cancellation and reissuance of warrants was treated as a modification under ASC 470-50 Modifications and Extinguishments although the change in cash flow was <10% so extinguishment accounting was not applicable.

Cancelled and re-issued warrants were as follows:

Accounting for the Financing Arrangements:

We have evaluated the terms and conditions of the secured convertible debentures under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. We have determined that, while the anti-dilution protections preclude treatment of the embedded conversion option as conventional, the conversion option is exempt from classification as a derivative because it otherwise achieves the conditions for equity classification (if freestanding) provided in ASC 815. We have further determined that the default redemption features described above are not exempt for treatment as derivative financial instruments, because they are not clearly and closely related in terms of risk to the host debt agreement. On the inception date of the arrangements through June 30, 2010, we determined that the fair value of these compound derivatives is de minus. However, we are required to re-evaluate this value at each reporting date and record changes in its fair value, if any, in income. For purposes of determining the fair value of the compound derivative, we have evaluated multiple, probability-weighted cash flow scenarios. These cash flow scenarios include, and will continue to include fair value information about our common stock. Accordingly, fluctuations in our common stock value will significantly influence the future outcomes from applying this technique.

Since, as discussed above, the embedded conversion options did not require treatment as derivative financial instruments; however, we were required to evaluate the feature as embodying a beneficial conversion feature under ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options. A beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) is present when the fair value of the underlying common share exceeds the effective conversion price of the conversion option. The effective conversion price is calculated as the basis in the financing arrangement allocated to the hybrid convertible debt agreement, divided by the number of shares into which the instrument is indexed. Because the two hybrid debt contracts dated September 10, 2008 were issued as compensation for the Interlink Asset Group and as further discussed in Note 3 we concluded that they should be combined for accounting purposes and the accounting resulted in no beneficial conversion feature. The financings issued in 2009 were found to have a BCF which gives effect to the (i) the trading market price on the contract dates and (ii) the effective conversion price of each issuance after allocation of proceeds to all financial instruments sold based upon their relative fair values. Notwithstanding, the BCF was limited to the value ascribed to the remaining hybrid contract (using the relative fair value approach). Accordingly, the BCF allocated to paid-in capital from the 2009 financings amounted to $872,320 for the year ended September 30, 2009.

We evaluated the terms and conditions of the Series B, Series C and Series BD warrants under the guidance of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”). The warrants embody a fundamental change-in-control redemption privilege wherein the holder may redeem the warrants in the event of a change in control for a share of assets or consideration received in such a contingent event. This redemption feature places the warrants within the scope of ASC 480-10, as put warrants and, accordingly, they are classified in liabilities and measured at inception and on an ongoing basis at fair value. Fair value of the warrants was measured using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation technique and in applying this technique we were required to develop certain subjective assumptions which are listed in more detail below.

Premiums on the secured convertible debentures arose from initial recognition at fair value, which is higher than face value. Discounts arose from initial recognition at fair value, which is lower than face value. Premiums and discounts are amortized through credits and debits to interest expense over the term of the debt agreement.

Direct financing costs were allocated to the financial instruments issued (hybrid debt and warrants) based upon their relative fair values. Amounts related to the hybrid debt are recorded as deferred finance costs and amortized through charges to interest expense over the term of the arrangement using the effective interest method. Amounts related to the warrants were charged directly to income because the warrants were classified in liabilities, rather than equity, as described above. Direct financing costs are amortized through charges to interest expense over the term of the debt agreement.

On September 24, 2009, we obtained an extension of the interest payments due June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The change in cash flow from this modification was analyzed to determine if it was greater than 10% which would give rise to extinguishment accounting. In each case, the change in cash flows was less than 10% so extinguishment accounting was not applicable.

On February 24, 2010, we exchanged the convertible debentures for newly issued convertible debentures as discussed in the beginning of this footnote.

Note 6 – Redeemable Preferred Stock

Redeemable preferred stock consists of the following as of:

Our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock became mandatorily redeemable for cash of $5,000,000 on June 30, 2011. On that date, after negotiations with our preferred investors, we modified the underlying Certificate of Designation solely to extend the mandatory redemption date to July 1, 2013. In considering all facts and circumstances, including the changes in future cash flows and the fair value of the embedded conversion feature, we concluded that the modification to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was substantial, thus warranting accounting analogous to extinguishment accounting for debt wherein the fair value of the amended contracts replace the carrying value of the original contracts. The difference between those two amounts in the case of preferred stock is recorded in stockholders equity.

We first accreted the Series A Convertible to the June 30, 2011 redemption date with a charge to paid-in capital (in the absence of accumulated earning) in the amount of $2,442,686. The accretion adjustment resulted in a carrying value of our redeemable preferred stock in the amount of $5,000,000. We then adjusted the compound embedded derivative that had been carried in liabilities at fair value on the modification date, which resulted in a reduction credit of $2,500,000 and was recorded in income. The derivative fair value adjustment resulted in a carrying value of $8,800,000. Therefore, the combined carrying value of the Series A Convertible Preferred immediately preceding the modification amounted to $13,800,000. We computed the fair value using a combination of the forward cash flow, at risk adjusted discount rates, plus the fair value of the embedded conversion feature using Monte Carlo Simulation (“MCS”) techniques. The value of the preferred stock on this basis amounted to $13,246,609. As a result, our calculation of the extinguishment resulted in a credit to paid-in capital in the amount of $553,391.

The discount rate that we used to present value future cash flows from the modified preferred stock amounted to 7.75%. This rate was developed using bond curves for companies with similar high-risk credit ratings, plus a risk free rate of 0.50% representing the yield on zero coupon government securities with two year remaining terms. Material inputs into the MCS included volatilities ranging from 89.9% to 105.3%, a market interest rate equal to the contractual coupon of 12%, and credit adjusted yields ranging from 7.19% to 7.75%.

By way of background, on February 24, 2010, we designated 500 shares of our authorized preferred stock as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock; par value $0.001 per share, stated value $10,000 per share (“Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash on June 30, 2011 at the stated value, plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends accrue, whether or not declared, at a rate of 12% of the stated value. The Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at the holder’s option at $0.25 based upon the stated value (20,000,000 linked common shares). Such conversion rate is subject to adjustment for traditional reorganizations and recapitalization and in the event that we sell common stock or other equity-linked instruments below the conversion price. Holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled to a preference equal to the stated value, plus accrued and unpaid dividends. While the Preferred Stock is outstanding, holders vote the number of indexed common shares.

We sold 300 shares of Series A Preferred on February 24, 2010, with warrants to purchase 12,000,000 shares of our common stock for proceeds of $3,000,000. We sold 200 shares of Series A Preferred on October 25, 2010, with warrants to purchase 8,000,000 shares of our common stock for proceeds of $2,000,000.

Our accounting for the Preferred Stock and warrant financing transaction required us to evaluate the classification of the embedded conversion feature and the warrants. As a prerequisite to establishing the classification of the embedded conversion option, we were required to determine the nature of the hybrid Preferred Stock contract based upon its risks as either a debt-type or equity-type contract. The presence of the mandatory cash redemption and the requirement to accrue dividends were persuasive evidence that the Preferred Stock was more akin to a debt than an equity contract, with insufficient evidence to the contrary (e.g. voting privilege). Given that the embedded conversion feature, when evaluated as embodied in a debt-type contract, did not meet the definition for an instrument indexed to a company’s own stock, the embedded conversion feature required bifurcation and classification in liabilities, at fair value. Similarly, the warrants did not meet the definition for an instrument indexed to a company’s own stock, resulting in their classification in liabilities, at fair value.

The following table reflects the allocation of the purchase price on the financing date: