1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 788 F.3d
  5. 788 F.3d 916 (2014)
 

HARRIS v. AMGEN, INC.

No. 10-56014.

788 F.3d 916 (2014)

Steve HARRIS; Dennis F. Ramos, aka Dennis Ramos; Donald Hanks; Jorge Torres; Albert Cappa, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMGEN, INC.; Amgen Manufacturing, Limited; Frank J. Biondi, Jr.; Jerry D. Choate; Frank C. Herringer; Gilbert S. Omenn; David Baltimore; Judith C. Pelham; Kevin W. Sharer; Frederick W. Gluck; Leonard D. Schaeffer; Charles Bell; Jacqueline Allred; Amgen Plan Fiduciary Committee; Raul Cermeno; Jackie Crouse; Fiduciary Committee of the Amgen Manufacturing Limited Plan; Lori Johnston; Michael Kelly, Defendants-Appellees, Dennis M. Fenton; Richard Nanula; The Fiduciary Committee; Amgen Global Benefits Committee; Amgen Fiduciary Committee, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Amended May 26, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen J. Fearon, Jr. and Garry T. Stevens, Jr. , Squitieri & Fearon, LLP, New York, N.Y.; Stephen M. Fishback and Daniel L. Keller , Keller, Fishback & Jackson, LLP, Tarzana, CA; Francis M. Gregorek , Betsy C. Manifold , and Rachele R. Rickert , Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, San Diego, CA, Mark C. Rifkin (argued), Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, New York, N.Y.; and Thomas James McKenna , Gainey & McKenna, New York, N.Y., for Appellants.

Emily Seymour Costin , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Steven Oliver Kramer and Jonathan David Moss , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Jonathan Rose , Alston & Bird, LLP, Washington, D.C.; John Nadolenco , Mayer Brown, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Brian David Netter , Mayer Brown, LLP, Washington, D.C.; and Robert P. Davis (argued), Mayer Brown, LLP, New York, N.Y., for Appellees.

Concurrence to Order by Judge W. FLETCHER; Dissent to Order by Judge KOZINSKI; Opinion by Judge W. FLETCHER.

ORDER

The opinion filed on October 30, 2014, and published at 770 F.3d 865, is hereby amended and replaced by the amended opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judge W. Fletcher has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en bane and Judges Farris and Korman so recommend.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en bane. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases