U.S. v. CITY OF DETROIT

Case No. 77-71100.

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. City of Detroit, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 14, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by Annette M. Lang , U.S. Department of Justice & Peter A. Caplan , United States Attorney's Office.

Detroit Chamber of Commerce, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Beth S. Gotthelf , Butzel Long.

City of Detroit, Defendant, represented by Marilyn A. Peters , Dykema Gossett, Mark D. Jacobs , Dykema Gossett, Charles N. Raimi , Detroit Medical Center, James D. Noseda , Detroit City Law Department, Kathryn J. Humphrey , Dykema Gossett, Michael M. Muller , Detroit City Law Department, Sonal H. Mithani , Miller, Canfield & Avery K. Williams , Williams Acosta.

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Defendant, represented by Marilyn A. Peters , Dykema Gossett, Mark D. Jacobs , Dykema Gossett, Robert C. Walter - INACTIVE , Detroit City Law Department, Kathryn J. Humphrey , Dykema Gossett, Lauren M. Phillips , Dykema Gossett PLLC & Michael M. Muller , Detroit City Law Department.

MI St, Defendant, represented by Pamela J. Stevenson , Michigan Department of Attorney General.

County of Macomb, Defendant, represented by R. Craig Hupp , Bodman & William W. Misterovich .

Northville Township, Defendant, represented by Robert A. Marzano , Plunkett & Cooney, Ernest J. Essad, Jr. , Williams, Williams & Wayne E. Walker , Williams, Williams.

Township of Canton, Defendant, represented by Timothy L. Cronin , Hemming, Polaczyk.

Plymouth Township, Defendant, represented by Timothy L. Cronin , Hemming, Polaczyk.

Oakland Cnty, Defendant, represented by Beth S. Gotthelf , Butzel Long, David W. Potts , Joseph W. Colaianne , Oakland County Corporation Counsel, Jaye Quadrozzi , Young & Associates & Rodger D. Young , Young & Associates.

Western Township Utilities Authority, Defendant, represented by Charles E. Barbieri , Foster, Swift.

City of Plymouth, Defendant, represented by Charles E. Lowe , Lowe, Lewandowski & Robert A. Marzano , Plunkett & Cooney.

City of Ecorse, Defendant, represented by David S. Steingold , Law Offices of David S. Steingold PLLC.

Rochester Hills, Defendant, represented by John D. Staran , Hafeli, Staran.

City of Grosse Pointe, Defendant, represented by John H. Fildew , Fildew Hinks & Charles S. Kennedy, III , Fildew Hinks.

County of Wayne, Defendant, represented by Solon M. Phillips , City of Detroit Law Department & Stephen A. Campbell , Wayne County Corporation Counsel.

Oakland County, Defendant, represented by Rodger D. Young , Young & Associates & Rodger D. Young , Young & Associates.

City of Allen Park, Defendant, represented by Christopher J. Forsyth , Flood Lanctot Connor Stablien PLLC.

AFSCME Local 207, Defendant, represented by Richard G. Mack , Miller, Cohen.

Senior Accountants, Analysts, and Appraisers' Association, Defendant, represented by George B. Washington , Scheff & Washington.

Michigan AFSCME Council 25 and its Affiliated Local 207, Defendant, represented by Richard G. Mack , Miller, Cohen.

City of Dearborn Heights, Movant, represented by Patrick B. McCauley , Gasiorek Morgan Greco & McCauley, PC.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Movant, represented by Annette M. Lang , U.S. Department of Justice.

Jonathan W. Bulkley, Mediator, Pro Se.

City of Detroit, Counter Claimant, represented by Avery K. Williams , Williams Acosta, Marilyn A. Peters , Dykema Gossett, Mark D. Jacobs , Dykema Gossett & Michael M. Muller , Detroit City Law Department.

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Counter Claimant, represented by Marilyn A. Peters , Dykema Gossett, Mark D. Jacobs , Dykema Gossett, Robert C. Walter - INACTIVE , Detroit City Law Department, Lauren M. Phillips , Dykema Gossett PLLC & Michael M. Muller , Detroit City Law Department.


RULING ON REQUEST FOR INDICATIVE RULING, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 62.1 Related to 6th Circuit Case No. 13-1708.

This longstanding case is currently before the Court on a request for an indicative ruling, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1, on a Joint Motion for Relief under Fed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases