UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

OR

Commission file number 000-21430

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes x   No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x

There is no market for the registrant’s common equity; therefore, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common equity held by non-affiliates is not calculable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes x     No ¨

As of April 1, 2013, there were 10 voting common Class A Shares, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding, and 9,039,035 non-voting common Class B Shares, par value $0.001, outstanding. 

Page 1 of 98 pages

Exhibit Index Appears on Page 51 hereof

RIVIERA HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

General

Riviera Holdings Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“RHC” or the “Company”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Riviera Operating Corporation (“ROC”), owns and operates the Riviera Hotel & Casino (“Riviera Las Vegas”) located on Las Vegas Boulevard in Las Vegas, Nevada. Riviera Las Vegas, which opened in 1955, has a long-standing reputation for delivering traditional Las Vegas-style gaming, entertainment and other amenities. The Company was incorporated in Nevada on January 27, 1993.

Available Information

The Company maintains an internet website at www.rivierahotel.com and makes available on the website, free of charge, the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any and all amendments to such reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company has included its website address in this filing only as a textual reference. The information contained on that website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Sale of Riviera Black Hawk

On April 26, 2012, RHC completed the sale of RBH to Monarch Casino and Resorts, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Monarch Growth Inc., a Nevada corporation (collectively, the “Buyer”). The Buyer purchased Riviera Black Hawk by acquiring all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of RBH. The Buyer paid $76 million for the stock, subject to certain post-closing working capital adjustments. At the closing, ROC paid or satisfied substantially all of RBH’s indebtedness (which consisted of inter-company accounts and equipment leases) and placed $2.1 million of working capital (as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement) in a restricted bank account. Accordingly, the Company has reflected the business, including gain on sale, as discontinued operations.

Emergence from Bankruptcy

As previously reported, on July 12, 2010 (the "Petition Date"), RHC, ROC and RBH (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed petitions (the "Chapter 11 Cases") for relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada (the “Bankruptcy Court”).  On November 17, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered a written order confirming the Debtors’ Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (as amended and supplemented, the “Plan”).  On December 1, 2010, the Plan became effective.

On April 1, 2011 (the “Substantial Consummation Date”), the Debtors emerged from reorganization proceedings under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Reorganized Debtors”).

As of the Substantial Consummation Date, the Company adopted the “fresh-start” provisions in accordance with accounting guidance on reorganizations, which require that all assets and liabilities be recorded at their reorganization values and fair values, respectively, as of such Substantial Consummation Date. Certain of these values differed materially from the values recorded on Predecessor’s (as defined below) balance sheet as of March 31, 2011. In addition, the Company’s accounting practices and policies may not be the same as that of Predecessor’s. For all of these reasons, our consolidated financial statements for periods subsequent to the Substantial Consummation Date are not comparable with Predecessor’s prior periods.

References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “Successor” refers to the Company on or after April 1, 2011.  References to “Predecessor” refer to the Company prior to April 1, 2011. The accompanying consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the 12 months ended December 31, 2011 are presented for two periods: January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 (the “Predecessor Period”) and April 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the “Successor Period”). The Predecessor Period reflects the historical accounting basis in Predecessor’s assets and liabilities, while the Successor Period reflects assets and liabilities at fair value by allocating the Company’s enterprise value to its assets and liabilities pursuant to accounting guidance related to business combinations.

For the Predecessor Period, the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Predecessor have been prepared in accordance with accounting guidance for financial reporting by entities in reorganization under the United States Bankruptcy Code. Reorganization items include the expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses resulting from the reorganization under the United States Bankruptcy Code, and are reported separately as reorganization items in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Cash received and payments for reorganization items are disclosed separately in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.

Further details about the Debtor's reorganization proceedings under the United States Bankruptcy Code, the emergence from reorganization of the Reorganized Debtors and the sale of RBH can be found in RHC's filings with the SEC, including RHC's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2010, Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2010, Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 21, 2011, Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2011 and Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2011.

Change in Capital Structure

Pursuant to the Plan, on the Substantial Consummation Date, all existing shares of the Company’s equity securities, including common stock outstanding prior to the Substantial Consummation Date, were cancelled, and the Company issued (i) 10 voting common Class A Shares, par value $0.001 per share (“Class A Voting Common Stock”), to Riviera Voteco, L.L.C.; and (ii) 8,550,000 non-voting common Class B Shares, par value $0.001 per share (“Class B Non-Voting Common Stock”), to certain former creditors of the Reorganized Debtors. The Company also issued warrants exercisable into an aggregate of 950,001 shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stock to the recipients of the Class B Non-Voting Common Stock. As of the Substantial Consummation Date, there is no public market for the Company’s securities.

Board of Directors and Management Changes

On the Substantial Consummation Date, each of Paul Harvey, James Land and Vincent DiVito voluntarily resigned from the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”). Following the Substantial Consummation Date, Phil Simons served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company until April 19, 2011, Tullio Marchionne remains with the Company as the Secretary of the Company and Robert Vannucci served as a Special Advisor to the President and Chief Executive Officer of ROC until May 1, 2012.

On the Substantial Consummation Date, Mr. Vannucci entered into an employment agreement with ROC. The employment agreement provided that Mr. Vannucci would be an non-executive employee employed as Special Advisor to the President and Chief Executive Officer of ROC for a period of 13 months beginning on the Substantial Consummation Date, which ended on May 1, 2012.

Pursuant to the Plan, as of the Substantial Consummation Date, the Board consists of: Barry S. Sternlicht, Derek J. Stevens, Marcos Alvarado and Andy Choy.  Mr. Sternlicht serves as the Chairman of the Board.  Each of Messrs. Sternlicht, Stevens, Alvarado and Choy were designated to the Board pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. Mr. Sternlicht is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and owner of Starwood Capital Group and its related entities and Mr. Alvarado is an employee of one of these related entities. Mr. Stevens is an employee and member of Desert Rock Enterprises LLC. As a result of the transactions contemplated by the Plan and consummated on the Substantial Consummation Date, Desert Rock Enterprises LLC and entities affiliated with Starwood Capital Group own approximately 12% and 43%, respectively, of the outstanding Class B Non-Voting Common Stock, and Desert Rock Enterprises LLC and an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Sternlicht collectively own 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Riviera Voteco, L.L.C., which in turn owns 100% of the Class A Voting Common Stock. Additionally, pursuant to the Plan, Mr. Choy was elected to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company as of the Substantial Consummation Date.

Riviera Las Vegas

General

Riviera Las Vegas is located on the corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Riviera Boulevard in Clark County, Nevada, across Las Vegas Boulevard from the Circus Circus Las Vegas Resort and Casino and the Resorts World Las Vegas (formerly known as Echelon) construction project and just south of the Fontainebleau project. Boyd Gaming Corporation, the owner of the Echelon project, suspended construction on the project indefinitely as a result of economic issues. On March 4, 2013 Genting Group and Boyd Gaming announced that they had entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement for the Echelon project, and closed on the transaction that day. Phase 1 of Genting Group’s Resorts World Las Vegas (formerly Echelon Place) is to include 3,500 rooms and 175,000 square feet of casino with an estimated opening in 2016. The Fontainebleau project was owned by Fontainebleau Las Vegas LLC which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in June 2009. The property was acquired by Icahn Nevada Gaming Acquisition LLC in January 2010. Plans for the Fontainebleau project are unknown. On February 12, 2013, SBE Hotel Group announced it began renovation of the SLS Las Vegas (formerly known as the Sahara Hotel and Casino) and is to include 1,600 rooms with an estimated opening in the fall of 2014.

Gaming

Riviera Las Vegas has approximately 100,000 square feet of casino space. The casino currently has 1,038 slot machines, 39 gaming tables and 6 poker tables. The casino also includes a race and sports book, which is operated by William Hill US, a subsidiary of William Hill PLC. The Company closed its Bingo room in July 2012.

Hotel

Riviera Las Vegas’ hotel is comprised of five towers with 2,075 guest rooms, including 177 suites, as follows:

Restaurants

Riviera Las Vegas owns and operates four bars and three restaurants, and also offers banquet event service and room service. The Poolside Café was closed in January 2013. The following outlines the type of service provided and total seating capacity for each restaurant:

In addition, Riviera Las Vegas operates two snack bars and has a 200 seat fast-food “food court” which had several fast food locations operating during 2012. The food court maintenance is managed by a third party. As of December 31, 2012, all nine food court locations were leased to independent fast food operators. In addition, Riviera Las Vegas leases space to the operator of The Banana Leaf Restaurant, which is a full service restaurant serving American and Asian cuisine, and The Queen Victoria Pub, which is a full service restaurant and pub serving pub style cuisine and a large variety of draft and bottled beers. The Banana Leaf Restaurant and the Queen Victoria Pub are located adjacent to the casino floor. The Banana Leaf Restaurant opened during the first quarter of 2007, and the Queen Victoria Pub opened during the second quarter of 2010.

Convention Center

Riviera Las Vegas features approximately 160,000 square feet of convention, meeting and banquet space. The convention center is one of the larger convention facilities in Las Vegas and is an important feature that attracts customers. The facility can be reconfigured for multiple meetings of small groups or large gatherings of up to 5,000 people. Features include ample convention, meeting and banquet facilities in addition to teleconferencing, wireless internet, satellite uplink capabilities and 12 skyboxes.

Entertainment

Riviera Las Vegas has five entertainment venues and an extensive entertainment program. In 2012, the Company had four shows running in its three operating entertainment venues. In addition, the Company offered limited engagement shows in its Starlite Theater. The following table outlines the type of service provided and total seating capacity for each of these entertainment venues:

As of December 31, 2012, one of our shows, Comedy Club, is owned and operated by us, all other shows are owned and operated by third parties. For the shows that we own, we receive all ticket revenue and bear the expense of the show. For the other shows, we receive ticket sales commissions and a predetermined number of complimentary tickets that we use primarily for marketing and promotions. In addition, we receive any gaming and food and beverage revenues from show patrons. The show operators pay rent. We are searching for a new show for the Versailles Theater which has been vacant since 2009.

Marketing Strategies - Gaming

Our current marketing programs are directed at mid-level gaming customers.  Mid-level gaming customers tend to provide us with a more consistent gaming revenue stream.  In 2011, we implemented a marketing campaign to target customers that prefer traditionally Asian table games such as Baccarat and Pai-Gow. Our principal strategy is to continue to invest in our slot machines and table game products, market to our customer base primarily through a multi-tiered player’s club program known as Club Riviera, and to methodically offer slot machine and poker tournaments and other special events and promotions.     

Generating customer loyalty is a critical component of our business strategy as retaining customers is less expensive than attracting new ones.  Consequently, we store all of our Club Riviera player’s information in a proprietary database program which we use for sending special offerings to Club Riviera members based on a variety of criteria.   We frequently use discounted or complimentary meals at our restaurants, accommodations at our hotel and tickets at our shows to incentivize Club Riviera members and other prospective customers to visit and game at our property.   All slot machine and table game players are encouraged to join Club Riviera.  We entice customers to enroll in Club Riviera with a variety of incentives including free slot machine play offers.  Once a player joins Club Riviera, we can track the player’s level of play and gain useful information about the player’s preferences.  We offer qualifying customers personalized service, credit availability and access to a variety of complimentary or reduced-rate hotel room, dinner and entertainment options.  We have found that an individualized marketing approach has been successful in generating revenue and repeat business.

We also seek to maximize the number of people who patronize the Riviera Las Vegas but who are not guests in the hotel by capitalizing on Riviera Las Vegas’ Las Vegas Strip location and proximity to the Las Vegas Convention Center, the Circus Circus Las Vegas Resort and Casino, LVH, and various time-share and condominium properties. 

Marketing Strategies - Rooms

We continue to focus on our convention customer.  The convention market consists of two groups:  (1) those trade organizations and groups that hold their events in the banquet and meeting space provided by a single hotel and (2) those attending city-wide events, usually held at the Las Vegas Convention Center.  We target convention business because it typically provides patrons willing to pay higher room rates and we are able to capitalize on certain advance planning benefits because conventions are often booked one to two years in advance of the event date.  We focus our marketing efforts on conventions whose participants have the most active gaming profile and higher banquet and function spending habits; they are typically most likely to be willing to pay higher room rates.  We also benefit from our proximity to the Las Vegas Convention Center, which makes us attractive to city-wide conventioneers looking to avoid the congestion that occurs during a major convention, particularly at the south end of the Las Vegas Strip.  In 2012, we derived approximately 18% of our hotel occupancy and approximately 25% of our room revenues from convention customers and we consider them to be a critical component of our customer base.    

In addition to our convention customers, we have found that our customers also tend to use tour and travel “package” options to reduce the cost of travel, lodging and entertainment.  These packages are produced by wholesale operators and travel agents and often emphasize mid-week and longer duration stays.  Tour and travel patrons often book at off-peak periods, helping us to maintain occupancy levels throughout the year.  We have developed specialized marketing programs and cultivated relationships with wholesale operators, travel agents and major domestic air carriers to expand this market.  We make an effort to convert many tour and travel customers who meet our target customer gaming profile into repeat slot customers.  

Finally, we are focused on driving casino customers by offering them complimentary and casino rate rooms, which we expect will contribute to improving gaming revenues. In 2012, we derived 15% of our hotel occupancy from invited casino customers and we consider them to be a critical component of our customer base.

Competitive Environment in Las Vegas, Nevada

Las Vegas is a highly competitive environment offering a variety of hospitality and entertainment options. The Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) reported that the number of people visiting Las Vegas increased 2.1% to 39.7 million visitors in 2012 from 38.9 million visitors in 2011. While there was an increase in visitation in 2012 compared to 2011, the gaming revenue per Las Vegas visitor has not yet returned to the peak experienced in 2007. Additionally, the LVCVA reported that available room inventory increased to 150,481 rooms as of December 31, 2012 from 150,161 rooms available as of December 31, 2011. This represents a 0.2% increase over the prior year.

To entice customers to their properties, our competitors continue to offer prospective customers significantly discounted pricing and complimentary offerings. The LVCVA reported that Las Vegas hotel room occupancy, which is defined as occupied hotel rooms divided by total available hotel rooms, increased 0.6% to 87.4% for the year ended December 31, 2012. LVCVA also reported that average daily room rate, which is defined as hotel room revenue divided by occupied hotel rooms, increased $2.97, or 2.8%, to $108.08 for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Riviera Las Vegas competes with all Las Vegas area casinos but primarily with certain large casino/hotels located on or near the Las Vegas Strip. Most of these properties offer more and better amenities than those offered by Riviera Las Vegas and many of our direct competitors have significantly greater resources than we do. To compete, we have had to lower our room rates as these properties lower their room rates. Because of our position within the market, the challenges associated with our location (see below) and the impact of the weak economy on consumer spending, our average daily room rates decreased $0.31, or 0.5%, to $59.89 for 2012 from $60.20 in the prior year. Our hotel room occupancy (based on total rooms) decreased to 73.4% in 2012 from 77.2% in the prior year.

We also compete for people who come and spend money at Riviera Las Vegas who are not guests in our hotel. We capitalize on our location on the Las Vegas Strip across from the Circus Circus Las Vegas Resort and Casino. However, our location at the north end of the Las Vegas Strip poses additional challenges as the dormant Resorts World Las Vegas (formerly known as Echelon) and Fontainebleau projects and the May 19, 2011 closure of the Sahara Hotel and Casino have resulted in and continue to cause a significant reduction in walk-in traffic.

In addition to competing with other casinos/hotels in the Las Vegas area, we compete to some extent with casinos in other states, riverboat and Native American gaming ventures, state-sponsored lotteries, on and off track wagering, card parlors, cruise ship gaming and other forms of legalized gaming in the United States. To a lesser extent, we also compete with internet gaming, gaming on cruise ships and gaming in other parts of the world. In addition, certain states recently legalized or are considering legalizing casino gaming in specific geographical areas within those states and internationally. Any future development of casinos, lotteries or other forms of gaming in other states and internationally could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

The number of casinos on Native American lands has increased since the enactment of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988.  California voters addressed this issue on March 7, 2000 when they voted in favor of an amendment to the California Constitution that allows Las Vegas-style gambling on Native American lands in that state.  Additionally, California voters passed Propositions 94, 95, 96 and 97 which allow two tribes near San Diego to each increase their slot machine volume from 2,000 slot machines to 7,500 slot machines and two tribes near Palm Springs to each increase their slot machine volume from 2,000 slot machines to 5,000 slot machines.  While new gaming jurisdictions generally have not materially impacted Las Vegas, the expansion of gaming in California poses a more serious threat due to its proximity to Las Vegas.

Our current business is highly dependent on gaming in Las Vegas. Riviera Las Vegas derives a substantial percentage of its business from tourists, including customers from southern California and the southwestern United States. The current economic recession has had an adverse effect on the number of visitors traveling to Las Vegas. A continued economic downturn along with events in the future similar to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, could have an adverse effect on both the number of visitors traveling to Las Vegas and our financial results.

As a result of the above mentioned competitive environment challenges in the Las Vegas market, there can be no assurance that we will compete successfully in the future.

Employees and Labor Relations at the Riviera Las Vegas

As of December 31, 2012, Riviera Las Vegas had an aggregate of 1,165 employees of which 758 were full-time equivalent employees and had collective bargaining contracts with eight unions covering 733 employees, including food and beverage employees, rooms department employees, carpenters, engineers, stagehands, electricians and painters. Riviera Las Vegas’ agreement with the Painters’ Union expired on May 31, 2010, and the agreement with the Carpenters’ Union expired on July 31, 2011.  We are continuing to negotiate the terms of both the Painters’ Union and Carpenters’ Union agreements and are currently operating under the terms of the expired agreements. Agreements with the Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Union, which cover the majority of our unionized employees, were renewed in 2007 and expire in May 2013 (the term of each agreement which originally expired in 2012, was extended for one year during 2009 negotiations to defer wage rate increases). Our agreement with the Stagehands Union was renewed in 2009 and expired in 2012, and negotiations for renewal continue. Our agreement with the Teamsters Union (primarily covers rooms department employees) was renewed in 2008 and expired on March 31, 2013. Our Operating Engineers Union agreement was renewed in 2009 and expired in 2011, and our Electrician Union agreement was renewed in 2012 and expires in 2015.  Our collective bargaining agreement with the Musicians Union expired in 1999. During 2011, we eliminated all musician positions as we had no shows requiring them and as such have eliminated the Musicians Union.  Although unions have been active in Las Vegas, Riviera Las Vegas considers its employee relations to be satisfactory. There can be no assurance, however, that new agreements will be reached without union action or on terms satisfactory to Riviera Las Vegas.

Nevada Regulation and Licensing

Nevada Gaming Authorities

The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Nevada are subject to: (1) The Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the "Nevada Act") and (2) various local ordinances and regulations. Our gaming operations are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Gaming Commission (the “Nevada Commission”), the State of Nevada Gaming Control Board (the “Nevada Board”), the Clark County Business License Department and the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board (collectively, the “Clark County Board”), all of which are collectively referred to as the "Nevada Gaming Authorities."

The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which are concerned with, among other things: (1) the prevention of unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time and in any capacity; (2) the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices and procedures; (3) the maintenance of effective controls over the financial practices of licensees, including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities; (4) the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices; and (5) providing a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. Changes in such laws, regulations and procedures could have an adverse effect on our operations.

ROC is required to be and is licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities (a “Corporate Licensee”). The gaming license held by ROC requires the periodic payment of fees and taxes and is not transferable. ROC is also licensed as a manufacturer and distributor of gaming devices. Such licenses require the periodic payment of fees and are not transferable. RHC is registered by the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation (a "Registered Corporation") and has been found suitable to own the stock of ROC. As a Registered Corporation, RHC is required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and to furnish any other information; that the Nevada Commission may require. No person may become a more than 5% stockholder of, or receive any percentage of profits from, ROC without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada Gaming Authorities. No person may become a 5% or less stockholder of ROC without registering with the Nevada Gaming Authorities. RHC and ROC have obtained, from the Nevada Gaming Authorities, the various registrations, approvals, permits, findings of suitability and licenses required in order to engage in gaming activities and manufacturing and distribution activities in Nevada.

The Nevada Gaming Authorities may investigate any individual who has a material relationship to, or material involvement with, RHC or ROC in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of a gaming licensee. Officers, directors and certain key employees of ROC must file applications with the Nevada Gaming Authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. RHC’s officers, directors and key employees who are actively and directly involved in the gaming activities of ROC may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause that they deem reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of suitability must pay all the costs of the investigation. Any change in a corporate position by a licensed person must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. In addition to their authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability or licensure, the Nevada Gaming Authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position.

If the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer, director or key employee unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with ROC or RHC, we would have to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, the Nevada Commission may require us or ROC to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Determinations of suitability or questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.

RHC and ROC are required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by ROC must be reported to or approved by the Nevada Commission.

If it were determined that the Nevada Act was violated by ROC, the gaming license it holds could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, RHC or ROC and the persons involved in the violation could be subject to substantial fines for each violation of the Nevada Act, at the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Further, a supervisor could be appointed by the Nevada Commission to operate our casino and, under certain circumstances, earnings generated during the supervisor's appointment (except for reasonable rental value of the casino) could be forfeited to the State of Nevada. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of the gaming license of ROC or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming license would) materially adversely affect our gaming operations.

Any beneficial holder of our voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated, and have its suitability as a beneficial holder of our voting securities determined if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation.

The Nevada Act requires any person who acquires more than 5% of a Registered Corporation's voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. The Nevada Act requires that beneficial owners of more than 10% of our voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. However, an "institutional investor," as defined in the Nevada Act, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 11% of our voting securities as a result of a stock repurchase by us may not be required to file such an application. Further, an institutional investor that acquires more than 10% but not more than 25% of our voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds our voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor that has obtained a waiver may hold more than 25% but not more than 29% of our voting securities and maintain its waiver where the additional ownership results from a stock repurchase by us. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold our voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of the Board, any change in our corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations, or any of our gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding our voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are deemed consistent with holding our voting securities for investment purposes only include: (1) voting on all matters voted on by stockholders; (2) making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in management, policies or operations; and (3) such other activities as the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent. If the beneficial holder of our voting securities who must be found suitable is a business entity or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation.

Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the Chairman of the Nevada Board may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner of stock if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any stockholder who is found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of stock beyond such period of time prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with RHC or ROC, we (1) pay that person any dividend or interest upon voting our securities, (2) allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, (3) pay remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise, or (4) fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of said voting securities for cash at fair market value. Additionally, the Clark County Board has the authority to approve all persons owning or controlling the stock of any corporation controlling a gaming licensee.

The Nevada Commission may, in its discretion, require any holder of our debt securities to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own such securities, if it has reason to believe that such ownership would be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. If the Nevada Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then we can be sanctioned (which may include the loss of our approvals) if, without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, we (1) pay to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever, (2) recognize any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities, (3) pay the unsuitable person remuneration in any form or (4) make any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.

We are required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada, which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We are also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner. The Nevada Commission has the power to require our stock certificates to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada Act. However, the Nevada Commission has not imposed such a requirement on us.

We may not make a public offering of our securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or proceeds are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming facilities in Nevada, or to retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes.

Changes in control of a Registered Corporation through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or any act or conduct by a person whereby he obtains control, may not occur without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Registered Corporation must meet a variety of stringent standards of the Nevada Board and Nevada Commission prior to assuming control. The Nevada Commission may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control, to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.

The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and corporate defensive tactics affecting Nevada corporate gaming licensees and Registered Corporations that are affiliated with those operations may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Commission has established regulations to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada's gaming industry and to further Nevada's policy to: (1) assure the financial stability of corporate gaming licensees and their affiliates; (2) preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and (3) promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Nevada Commission before the Registered Corporation can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above the current market price and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. The Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by the Registered Corporation's board of directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Registered Corporation's stockholders for the purposes of acquiring control of the Registered Corporation.

License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Nevada and to the county and city in which ROC’s operations are conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable monthly, quarterly or annually and are based upon: (1) a percentage of the gross revenues received; (2) the number of gaming devices operated; or (3) the number of table games operated. A live entertainment tax is also paid by casinos where live entertainment is furnished in connection with admission charges, the serving or selling of food, refreshments or the selling of merchandise where live entertainment is furnished. Nevada licensees that hold a license to manufacture and distribute slot machines and gaming devices, such as Riviera Operating Corporation, also pay certain fees and taxes to the State of Nevada.

Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, or required to be registered, or a person who is under common control with any of such persons (collectively, "Licensees"), and who proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada, is required to deposit with the Nevada Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation by the Nevada Board of such person’s participation in such foreign gaming. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease in the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Act. Licensees are also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if they knowingly violate any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engage in activities or enter into associations that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employ, have contact with or associate with a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the ground of personal unsuitability.

Alcoholic Beverage Licenses

The sale of alcoholic beverages in gaming establishments is subject to strict licensing, control and regulation by state and local authorities. Alcoholic beverage licenses are revocable and nontransferable. State and local licensing authorities have full power to limit, condition, suspend for as long as six months or revoke any such licenses. Violation of state alcoholic beverage laws may constitute a criminal offense resulting in incarceration, fines, or both.

Trademarks, Service Marks and Logos

Pursuant to a license agreement, ROC licenses to RBH the use at Riviera Black Hawk of all of the trademarks, service marks and logos owned by ROC. The license agreement provides that additional trademarks, service marks and logos acquired or developed by us and used at our other facilities will be subject to the license agreement.

Federal Registration

ROC is required to make annual filings with the Attorney General of the United States in connection with the sale, distribution, or operation of slot machines. All requisite filings for 2012 have been made.

Default

As a result of existing defaults under our credit facilities, if the interest rate we pay thereunder is increased or the amounts outstanding thereunder are accelerated, our available cash, results from operations and ability to conduct business operations will be negatively affected.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in default under the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement (as each is defined in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements). As a result, the interest rate we pay on amounts outstanding under each credit agreement may increase. An increase in the interest rate would negatively affect our available cash and results from operations. Further, the Required Lenders (as defined in the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement, respectively) and administrative agent under the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement, respectively, have the right to accelerate repayment of all amounts owed under each of the agreements and requires us to repay such amounts immediately. In the event that we were to repay all such amounts owed, we would not have sufficient capital resources to cover our operating losses and would need to obtain additional capital, including additional equity financing, debt financing or capital contributions from stockholders, if available to us. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Failure to secure any necessary additional financing would have a material adverse affect on our operations and ability to continue as a going concern. Any additional equity financing may result in substantial dilution to our then existing stockholders.

Goodwill, Intangibles, and Other Long Lived Assets

If we are required to impair our goodwill, intangibles, or other long lived assets, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other and ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, we are required to perform an annual impairment review of goodwill, intangibles and other long lived assets which could result in an impairment charge if it is determined that the carrying value of the assets are in excess of the fair value. We perform the impairment test annually during our fourth fiscal quarter. Goodwill, intangibles and other long lived assets are also tested more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events indicates that a potential impairment exists. When changes in circumstances, such as changes in the variables associated with the judgments, assumptions and estimates made in assessing the appropriate fair value indicate the carrying amount of certain assets may not be recoverable, the assets are evaluated for impairment. If actual operating results differ from these assumptions, it may result in an asset impairment. As of December 31, 2012, management concluded indicators of impairment existed and recorded a $24.8 million impairment charge. Future write-downs of intangibles and other long lived assets could affect certain of the financial covenants under our debt agreements, could restrict our financial flexibility, and would impact our results of operations.

Limited Operating History

Our business has a limited operating history, which makes our future operating results difficult to predict.

While Predecessor historically operated our casino gaming properties, we, as successor to Predecessor, have a limited operating history upon which you can base an evaluation of our business and prospects. To address these risks and uncertainties, we must do the following, among other things:

There can be no assurance that we will operate profitably or that we will have adequate working capital to meet our obligations as they become due. We cannot be certain that our business strategy will be successful, that we will successfully address the risks that face our business or that we will be able to access the capital markets if the need arises. In the event that we do not successfully address these risks, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Insufficient Cash Flow

We have been unable to achieve positive cash flow which could prevent us from funding operations and servicing our debt obligations.

We may be unable to generate positive cash flows. To the extent we do not achieve positive cash flows, we may lack sufficient liquidity to continue operating as planned and may be unable to service our debt obligations as they come due, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Further, our failure to generate positive cash flows could lead to additional cash flow and working capital constraints, which may require us to seek additional working capital. We may not be able to obtain such working capital when it is required. Further, even if we were able to obtain additional working capital, it may only be available on unfavorable terms. For example, we may be required to incur additional debt, the interest costs of which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. If any such required capital is obtained in the form of equity, the equity interests of the holders of the then-outstanding common stock could be diluted.

Prior Bankruptcy Filing

The bankruptcy filing has had a negative impact on Predecessor's image, which may negatively impact our business going forward.

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, Predecessor was the subject of negative publicity which has had an impact on the image of its assets. This negative publicity may have an effect on the terms under which some customers and suppliers are willing to do business with us and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may face potential successor liability for liabilities of Predecessor not provided for in the Plan.

As the successor to Predecessor, we may be subject to certain liabilities of Predecessor not provided for in the Plan. Such liabilities may arise in a number of circumstances, including those where:

Although we have no reason to believe that we will become subject to liabilities of Predecessor that are not provided for in the Plan, should we become subject to such liabilities, it could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Credit Markets

The current disruption in the credit markets and its effects on the global and domestic economies could adversely affect our business.

Recent substantial volatility in the global capital markets and widely-documented commercial credit market disruptions has a significant negative impact on financial markets, as well as the global and domestic economies. The effects of these disruptions are widespread and difficult to quantify, and it is impossible to predict when the global financial markets will improve. There is now general consensus among economists that the economies of the U.S. and much of the rest of the world were in a deep recession from late 2007 through 2009 and that the effects of this recession continue to be felt. As a result, we have and are continuing to experience reduced demand for our hotel rooms, gaming products and other services. Continued weakness in demand and in consumer and commercial spending may drive us and our competitors to continue to reduce pricing, particularly in room rates, which would have a negative impact on our gross profit. These adverse effects would likely be exacerbated if current global economic conditions persist or worsen resulting in wide-ranging, adverse and prolonged effects on general business conditions and our operations, financial results and liquidity.

Competition

We face intense competition in the market where we operate.

In Las Vegas, competition has continued to increase as a result of factors such as ongoing economic uncertainty, hotel room inventory increases and gaming floor expansions in addition to convention, trade show and meeting space additions. Our success depends on the ability of Riviera Las Vegas to attract customers and realize corresponding revenues. Riviera Las Vegas competes with casino resort properties and hotels in the Las Vegas area. Currently, there are approximately 30 major gaming properties located on or near the Las Vegas Strip, approximately ten additional major gaming properties in the downtown area and many additional gaming properties located in other areas of Las Vegas. Riviera Las Vegas competes with these properties based on overall atmosphere, range of amenities, level of service, price, location, entertainment offered, shopping and restaurant facilities, theme and size. Companies that own and operate multiple hotel/casino facilities operate many of the gaming properties in Las Vegas. These companies have greater name recognition and financial and marketing resources than we do and often market to the same target demographic groups as we do.

In addition to the competition that we face from our competitors in Las Vegas, we face increasing competition from other companies in the gaming industry generally, such as land-based casinos, dockside casinos, riverboat casinos, casinos located on Native American land and other forms of legalized gambling. We risk losing market share if other casinos operate more successfully or are enhanced or expanded or are established in or around the locations where we conduct business.

The number of casinos on Native American lands has increased since enactment of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. In 2000, California voters approved an amendment to the California Constitution that allows Las Vegas-style gaming on Native American lands in that state. Additionally, California voters recently passed Propositions 94, 95, 96 and 97 which allow two tribes near San Diego to each increase their slot machine volume from 2,000 slot machines to 7,500 slot machines and two tribes near Palm Springs to each increase their slot machine volume from 2,000 slot machines to 5,000 slot machines. While it is difficult to determine the impact of these new gaming jurisdictions, the continued expansion of gaming in California poses a more serious threat to the continued growth of Las Vegas. We also compete, to some extent, with other forms of gaming on both a local and national level, including state sponsored lotteries, Internet gaming, on- and off-track wagering and card parlors.

In particular, the legalization of gaming or the expansion of legalized gaming in or near any geographic area from which we attract or expect to attract a significant number of our customers could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Increased competition may also require us to make substantial capital expenditures to maintain or enhance the competitive positions of our property. Because we are highly leveraged and have considerable constraints on our available cash, we might not have sufficient financing to make such expenditures. If we are unable to make such expenditures, our competitive position, results of operations and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Las Vegas Market

We operate in only the Las Vegas market, which exposes us to greater risks than gaming companies with a presence in more markets.

We do not have material assets or operations other than Riviera Las Vegas. Therefore, we are entirely dependent upon this property for our cash flow. This makes us more sensitive to events and conditions affecting the market in which we operate, including the following:

Key Personnel

Our operations are largely dependent on the skill and experience of our management and key personnel. The loss of management and other key personnel or our inability to hire additional personnel could significantly harm our business.

Our ability to operate successfully is dependent, in part, upon the continued services of certain of our executive personnel. The loss of the services of any member of our management team or our inability to attract or retain key employees in the future could have a material adverse effect on us.

Regulatory Environment

Regulations issued by gaming or other governmental authorities could adversely affect our operations.

As owners and operators of a gaming facility, we are subject to extensive governmental regulation. The ownership, management and operation of gaming facilities are subject to extensive laws, regulations and ordinances, which are administered by various federal, state and local government entities and agencies. The gaming authorities in the jurisdictions in which we operate have broad authority and discretion to require us and our officers, directors, managers, employees and certain security holders to obtain various licenses, registrations, permits, findings of suitability or other approvals. To enforce applicable gaming regulations, gaming authorities may, among other things, limit, suspend or revoke the licenses of any gaming entity or individual, and may levy fines against us or individuals or may cause us to forfeit our assets for violations of gaming laws or regulations. Any of these actions would have a material adverse effect on us.

Nevada, state and local government authorities require us to obtain gaming licenses and require our officers and key employees to demonstrate suitability to be involved in gaming operations. Those authorities may limit, condition, suspend or revoke a license for any cause they deem reasonable. Also, if we violate any gaming laws or regulations, those authorities may levy substantial fines against us or the individuals involved in the violations. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

We cannot assure you that any new licenses, registrations, findings of suitability, permits and approvals will be granted or that our existing ones will be renewed when they expire. Any failure to renew or maintain our licenses or receive new licenses when necessary would have a material adverse effect on us.

We are subject to a variety of other laws, rules and regulations, including those pertaining to zoning, environmental matters, construction, land use and the serving of alcoholic beverages. We also pay substantial taxes and fees in connection with our operations as a gaming company, which taxes and fees are subject to increases or other changes at any time. Any changes to these laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Our compliance costs associated with these laws, regulations and licenses are significant. A change in the laws, regulations and licenses applicable to our business or a violation of any of them could require us to make material expenditures or could otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

In other jurisdictions from which we attract customers, gaming is subject to local referendum. If the results of a referendum in a nearby non-gaming jurisdiction were to permit gaming, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Environmental Liabilities

We are subject to potential exposure to environmental liabilities.

Generally, we are subject to various federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, emission and disposal of hazardous materials. Failure to comply could result in the imposition of severe penalties or restrictions on our operations by governmental agencies or courts. In 2002, the Las Vegas property experienced a diesel leak. Our continuing efforts to monitor and remediate the effects of this leak have been affected by construction at neighboring projects. We are continuing to monitor this matter. In order to come to final resolution regarding this issue with the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection, we may be required to take remediation steps including the excavation of the affected area. We are unable to estimate the cost of remediation at the present time.

Energy Prices

Energy price increases may adversely affect our costs of operations and our revenues.

Our casino property uses significant amounts of energy, natural gas and other forms of energy. Substantial increases in the cost of electricity in the United States could have a negative effect on our operating results. The extent of the impact is subject to the magnitude and duration of energy price increases, but this impact could be material. In addition, energy price increases in cities that constitute a significant source of customers for our property could result in a decline in disposable income of potential customers and a corresponding decrease in visitation to our property which could negatively impact our revenues.

Other Factors

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects are dependent on many factors that are beyond our control.

The economic health of our business is generally affected by a number of factors that are beyond our control, including:

Any of these factors could negatively impact our property or the casino industry generally, and as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Insurance Limitations

We may incur losses that are not adequately covered by insurance.

Insurance may not be available in the future or adequate to cover all loss or damage to which our business or our assets might be subjected. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, insurance coverage has diminished for certain types of damages or occurrences and is no longer available at reasonable commercial rates. The lack of adequate insurance for certain types or levels of risk could expose us to significant losses if a catastrophe or lawsuit occurs for which we do not have insurance coverage. Any losses we incur that are not adequately covered by insurance may decrease our future operating income, require us to pay the costs of replacing or repairing destroyed property and reduce the funds available for payment of our debt obligations.

Litigation

We are subject to litigation, which, if adversely determined, could cause us to incur substantial losses.

From time to time during the normal course of operating our business, we are subject to various litigation claims and other legal disputes. Some of the litigation claims may not be covered under our insurance policies or our insurance carriers may seek to deny coverage. As a result, we might be required to incur significant legal fees, which may have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, because we cannot predict the outcome of any legal action, it is possible that as a result of litigation, we will be subject to adverse judgments or settlements that could significantly reduce our results from operations.

Security, Terrorism and War

Homeland security, terrorism and war concerns, as well as other factors affecting discretionary consumer spending, may harm our operating results.

The strength and profitability of our business depend on consumer demand for hotel/casino resorts, gaming in general and the types of amenities we offer. Changes in consumer preferences or discretionary consumer spending could harm our business. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ongoing war activities and concerns about terrorism and homeland security have had a negative impact on travel and leisure expenditures, including lodging, gaming (in some jurisdictions) and tourism. We cannot predict the extent to which those events may continue to affect us, directly or indirectly, in the future. An extended period of reduced discretionary spending or disruptions or declines in travel could significantly harm our operations.

In addition to concerns about war, homeland security and terrorism, other factors affecting discretionary consumer spending include: consumers’ confidence in general or regional economic conditions, consumers’ disposable income, and consumers’ fears of a continued or worsening economic recession or an economic depression. Negative changes in factors affecting discretionary spending could reduce customer demand for the products and services we offer, thus imposing practical limits on our pricing and harming our operations.

Collective Bargaining Agreements

A significant portion of our labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements, and a dispute with covered employees or new labor agreements may lower our revenues and increase our costs.

As of December 31, 2012, 733 of our 1,165 employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements. A prolonged dispute with the covered employees could have an adverse impact on our operations. In addition, wage and/or benefit increases resulting from new labor agreements may be significant and could also have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

Net Win Volatility

Our revenues may be negatively impacted by volatility in our hold percentage.

Casino revenue is recorded as the difference between gaming wins and losses or net win from gaming activities. Net win is impacted by variations in the hold percentage (the ratio of net win to total amount wagered), or actual outcome, on our slot machines, table games, and all other games we provide to our customers. We use the hold percentage as an indicator of a game’s performance against its expected outcome. Although each game generally performs within a defined statistical range of outcomes, actual outcomes may vary for any given period. The hold percentage and actual outcome on our games can be impacted by the level of a customer’s skill in a given game, errors made by our employees, the number of games played, faults within the computer programs that operate our slot machines and the random nature of slot machine payouts. If our games perform below their expected range of outcomes, our cash flow will suffer.

Competitive Reinvestment

We may need to increase capital expenditures to compete effectively but we may not have sufficient funds to do so.

Capital expenditures, such as room refurbishments, amenity upgrades and new gaming equipment may be necessary from time to time to preserve the competitiveness of our hotel and casino. The gaming industry market is very competitive and is expected to become more competitive in the future. If cash from operations is insufficient to provide for needed levels of capital expenditures and we are unable to raise funds for such purposes elsewhere, we may be unable to make necessary improvements and our facility may be less attractive to our visitors than that of our competitors’, causing us to lose our competitive position.

Technology and Energy Dependence

We are dependent upon technology services and electrical power to operate our business, and if we experience damage or service interruptions, we may have to cease some or all of our operations, resulting in a decrease in revenues.

Our gaming operations rely heavily on technology services and an uninterrupted supply of electrical power. Our security system and all of our slot machines are controlled by computers and reliant on electrical power to operate. Without electrical power or a failure of the technology services needed to run the computers, we may be unable to run all or parts of gaming operations. Any unscheduled interruption in our technology services or interruption in the supply of electrical power is likely to result in an immediate, and possibly substantial, loss of revenues due to a shutdown of our gaming operations. Although our systems have been designed based on industry-standard architectures to reduce downtime in the event of outages or catastrophic occurrences, they remain vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks and similar events.

Riviera Brand

Our success depends on the value of our Riviera brand.

We depend on the name recognition of our Riviera brand in our marketing efforts. Maintaining and building recognition of our brand are important to expanding our customer base. If the value of our brand were adversely affected, our ability to attract customers would be negatively impacted and our growth could be impaired.

Our failure to protect our brands may undermine our competitive position and litigation to protect our brands or defend against third-party allegations of infringement may be costly.

We believe that it is important for our business to achieve brand recognition. We rely primarily on tradenames to achieve brand recognition. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our trademarks, trade names, and other intellectual property rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results. In addition, policing unauthorized use of our trademarks, trade names, and other intellectual property can be difficult and expensive. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. We cannot give any assurance that the outcome of such potential litigation will be in our favor. Such litigation may be costly and may divert management attention as well as expend our other resources away from our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and may harm our business, prospects, and reputation.

Climate Changes

Climate change, climate change regulations and greenhouse effects may adversely impact our operations and markets.

There is a growing political and scientific consensus that emission of greenhouse gases, also referred to herein as “GHGs” continue to alter the composition of the global atmosphere in ways that are affecting and are expected to continue affecting the global climate. Climate change, including the impact of global warming, creates physical and financial risk. Physical risks from climate change include an increase in sea level and changes in weather conditions, such as an increase in changes in precipitation and extreme weather events. Climate change could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. We have described the risks to us associated with extreme weather events in the risk factors above.

We may become subject to legislation and regulation regarding climate change, and compliance with any new rules could be difficult and costly. Concerned parties, such as legislators and regulators, stockholders and non-governmental organizations, as well as companies in many business sectors, are considering ways to reduce GHG emissions. Many states have announced or adopted programs to stabilize and reduce GHG emissions, and in the past, federal legislation has been proposed in Congress. If such legislation is enacted, we could incur increased energy, environmental and other costs and capital expenditures to comply with the limitations. Unless and until legislation is enacted and its terms are known, we cannot reasonably or reliably estimate its impact on our financial condition, operating performance or ability to compete. Further, regulation of GHG emissions may limit our customers' ability to travel to our properties as a result of increased fuel costs or restrictions on transportation.

Cyber Security Issues

We could face increased costs related to defending and resolving legal claims and other litigation related to cyber security issues.

Our reputation and business may be harmed from cyber security risk and we may be subject to legal claims if there is loss, disclosure or misappropriation of or access to our customers' or our business partners' or our own information or other breaches of our information security.

We make extensive use of online services and centralized data processing, including through third party service providers. The secure maintenance and transmission of customer information is a critical element of our operations. Our information technology and other systems that maintain and transmit customer information, or those of service providers, business partners, or employee information may be compromised by a malicious third party penetration of our network security, or that of a third party service provider or business partner, or impacted by advertent or inadvertent actions or inactions by our employees, or those of a third party service provider or business partner. As a result, our customers' information may be lost, disclosed, accessed or taken without our customers' consent.

In addition, we and our third party service providers and other business partners process and maintain proprietary business information and data related to our business-to-business customers, suppliers and other business partners. Our information technology and other systems that maintain and transmit this information, or those of service providers or business partners, may also be compromised by a malicious third party penetration of our network security or that of a third party service provider or business partner, or impacted by advertent or inadvertent actions or inactions by our employees or those of a third party service provider or business partner. As a result, our business information, customer, supplier, and other business partner data may be lost, disclosed, accessed or taken without their consent.

Any such loss, disclosure or misappropriation of, or access to, customers' or business partners' information or other breach of our information security can result in legal claims or legal proceedings, including regulatory investigations and actions, may have a serious impact on our reputation and may adversely affect our businesses, operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, the loss, disclosure or misappropriation of our business information may adversely affect our businesses, operating results and financial condition.

Present Indebtedness

Our present indebtedness and projected future borrowings could adversely affect our financial health; future cash flows may not be sufficient to meet our obligations, and we may have difficulty obtaining additional financing; and we may experience adverse effects of interest rate fluctuations.

As of December 31, 2012, we had indebtedness of approximately $76.9 million. We have available to us a revolving line of credit against our Working Capital Facility of up to $10 million, which has not been drawn as of April 1, 2013. However, due to the defaults under the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement, we do not currently have the ability to draw any additional funds under the Working Capital Facility until such time as the defaults are cured or waived. There can be no assurance in the future whether we will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or through asset sales to meet our long-term debt service obligations. Our present indebtedness and projected future borrowings could have important adverse consequences to us, such as:

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that our anticipated revenue growth will be realized, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our available credit in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. In addition, if we consummate significant acquisitions in the future, our cash requirements and our debt service requirements may increase significantly.

If we fail to generate sufficient cash flow from future operations to meet our debt service obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our debt on attractive terms, commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our future operating performance and our ability to service, extend or refinance our indebtedness will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

Our indebtedness imposes restrictive covenants on us.

Our indebtedness imposes various customary covenants on us and our subsidiaries. The restrictions that are imposed under these debt instruments include, among other obligations, limitations on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to:

Our ability to comply with the covenants imposed by the terms of our indebtedness may be affected by general economic conditions, industry conditions, and other events beyond our control. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with these covenants. Our failure to comply with such covenants, including failure to comply as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and our financial condition.

As disclosed in another risk factor, we are currently in default under our indebtedness and, the holders of the defaulted debt could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to that debt to be due and payable. We cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments if accelerated upon an event of default, or that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on any of those debt instruments.

Dividends, Trading Market and Ownership Dilution

We have never paid dividends do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future and cannot pay dividends to any unsuitable person.

We have never paid dividends on our stock, nor do we anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain our cash flow or earnings, if any, to use in our ongoing operations. Also, due to gaming law considerations, our Articles of Incorporation prohibit the payment of dividends to anyone who is deemed an “unsuitable person” or is an affiliate of an “unsuitable person.”

There is currently no trading market for our capital stock and no trading market may develop.

There is currently no public market for our capital stock. Further, applicable gaming law requirements severely restrict the ability of our stockholders to transfer their capital stock. If an active trading market does not develop, owners of our capital stock may have difficulty selling any of our common stock.

Ownership could be diluted by future issuances of our stock, options, warrants or other securities.

Ownership of our securities may be diluted by future issuances of capital stock or the exercise of outstanding or to be issued options, warrants or convertible notes to purchase capital stock. In particular, we may sell securities in the future in order to finance operations, expansions, or particular projects or expenditures.

Possible Application For Suitability

Certain owners of our stock may have to file an application with, and be investigated by, the Nevada gaming authorities. If that owner is deemed “unsuitable,” that owner could lose most of the attributes of being a stockholder and it could have a detrimental effect on us.

As defined in Nevada gaming regulations, any person who acquires more than 5% of a Registered Corporation’s voting securities must report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. Nevada gaming regulations also require that beneficial owners of more than 10% of our voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. However, an “institutional investor,” as defined in the Nevada gaming regulations, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 11%, of our voting securities as a result of a stock repurchase by us may not be required to file such an application. Further, an institutional investor that acquires more than 10%, but not more than 25%, of our voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds our voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor that has obtained a waiver may hold more than 25%, but not more than 29%, of our voting securities and maintain its waiver where the additional ownership results from a stock repurchase by us. However, any beneficial owner of our voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, may be required, at the discretion of the Nevada Commission, to apply for a finding of suitability. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and the applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada gaming authorities in conducting the investigation.

Any such person who fails to apply for a finding of suitability within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission may be found to be unsuitable. Any person who is found by the Nevada Commission to be unsuitable to be a beneficial owner of our voting securities but continues such beneficial ownership beyond the period of time prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. We will be subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a beneficial owner of our voting securities or to have any other relationship with us, we:

Forward-Looking Statements

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K ,we make “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include the words “may,” “would,” “could,” “likely,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect,” “project” or “anticipate” and similar words and our discussions about our ongoing or future plans, objectives or expectations and our liquidity projections. We do not guarantee that any of the transactions or events described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will happen as described or that any positive trends referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will continue. These forward-looking statements generally relate to our plans, objectives and expectations for future operations and results and are based upon what we consider to be reasonable estimates. Although we believe that our forward-looking statements are reasonable at the present time, we may not achieve or we may modify our plans, objectives and expectations. You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K thoroughly and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We do not plan to update forward-looking statements even though our situation or plans may change in the future, unless applicable law requires us to do so. Specific factors that might cause our actual results to differ from our plans, objectives or expectations, might cause us to modify our plans or objectives, or might affect our ability to meet our expectations include, but are not limited to:

All future written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. In light of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur.

None.

Riviera Las Vegas

Riviera Las Vegas is located on the Las Vegas Strip, at 2901 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada and occupies approximately 26 acres. The building comprises approximately 1.8 million square feet. The building includes approximately 100,000 square feet of casino space, approximately 160,000 square feet of convention, meeting and banquet facility space, 2,075 hotel rooms, three restaurants, a buffet, three snack bars, four showrooms, a lounge and approximately 2,300 parking spaces. In addition, the building houses Riviera Las Vegas executive and administrative offices. We own the land and buildings on and in which we operate the Riviera Las Vegas.

There are approximately 20 food and retail concessions operated under individual leases with third parties. The leases are for periods from one month to several years.

Encumbrances

We have pledged essentially all of our assets, including the Riviera Las Vegas, as collateral to secure our obligations under the Series A and Series B Credit Agreements (each as defined in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements).

We are party to routine lawsuits, either as plaintiff or as defendant, arising from the normal operations of a hotel or casino. We do not believe that the outcome of such litigation, in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of our operations.

Not applicable.

PART II

There is no established public trading market for the Company’s equity securities. As described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, on the Substantial Consummation Date, all existing shares of the Company’s equity securities, including common stock outstanding prior to the Substantial Consummation Date, were cancelled, and the Company issued (i) 10 shares of Class A Voting Common Stock, and (ii) 8,550,000 shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stock. Between June 26, 2009 and the Substantial Consummation Date, our then common stock was quoted on the OTC Pink market tier maintained by OTC Markets Group Inc. Except for the shares issued on the Substantial Consummation Date as described above and the issuance of 489,035 shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stock upon exercise of warrants during the year ended December 31, 2011, for the years ended December 31, 2012, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 we have not sold any securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

As of April 1, 2013, there was one stockholder of record of our Class A Voting Common Stock and 16 stockholders of record of our Class B Non-Voting Common Stock.

We have never paid dividends on our stock, nor do we anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain our cash flow or earnings, if any, to use in our ongoing operations. The holders of our Class A Voting Common Stock have no right to receive dividends or any other distributions. Subject to the rights of any preferred stock when, as and if, dividends are declared on our common stock, whether payable in cash, in property or in securities of the Company, the holders of our Class B Non-Voting Common Stock shall be entitled to share equally, share for share, in such dividends. Also, due to gaming law considerations, we are prohibited to pay dividends to anyone who is deemed an “unsuitable person” or is an affiliate of an “unsuitable person.”

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we did not make any purchases of our Class A Voting Common Stock.

The company did not maintain any equity compensation plan during 2012.

We have not provided a performance graph as there is no market for our securities.

The following selected consolidated financial data presents the financial results of the Company for the Successor year ended December 31, 2012 and the Successor nine months ended December 31, 2011 and for the Predecessor three months ended March 31, 2011 and the Predecessor years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008.

In accordance with accounting guidance related to financial reporting by entities in reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code, we adopted fresh-start reporting upon the Plan being consummated and becoming effective on December 1, 2010. As of the Substantial Consummation Date, the Company adopted the “fresh-start” provisions in accordance with accounting guidance on reorganizations, which require that all assets and liabilities be recorded at their reorganization values and fair values, respectively, as of such Substantial Consummation Date. Certain of these values differed materially from the values recorded on Predecessor’s (as defined below) balance sheet as of March 31, 2011. In addition, the Company’s accounting practices and policies may not be the same as that of Predecessor’s. For all of these reasons, our consolidated financial statements for periods subsequent to the Substantial Consummation Date are not comparable with Predecessor’s prior periods.

The accompanying consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the 12 months ended December 31, 2011 are presented for two periods: the Predecessor three months ended March 31, 2011 and the Successor nine months ended December 31, 2011. The Predecessor three months ended March 31, 2011 reflect the historical accounting basis in Predecessor’s assets and liabilities, while the Successor nine months ended December 31, 2011 reflect assets and liabilities at fair value by allocating the Company’s enterprise value to its assets and liabilities pursuant to accounting guidance related to business combinations.

The selected financial data set forth below is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” and audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result of the application of fresh-start reporting in accordance with accounting guidance on reorganizations, the financial statements of the Predecessor for the periods prior to April 1, 2011 are not comparable to our financial statements for the periods on or after April 1, 2011. The following information is not necessarily indicative of our future financial results.

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Overview

We own and operate Riviera Las Vegas on the Las Vegas Strip in Las Vegas, Nevada, and owned and operated Riviera Black Hawk in Black Hawk, Colorado until its sale on April 26, 2012.

On September 29, 2011, RHC, ROC, and RBH, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with the Buyer, pursuant to which the Buyer agreed to purchase the Riviera Black Hawk by acquiring all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of RBH. This transaction was completed on April 26, 2012. The Buyer paid $76 million for the stock, subject to certain post-closing working capital adjustments. At the closing, ROC paid or satisfied substantially all of RBH’s indebtedness and was required to leave at least $2.1 million of working capital, including at least $2.1 million of “cage cash” (as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement).

Our capital expenditures for Riviera Las Vegas are geared primarily toward maintaining and upgrading our hotel rooms, gaming products, convention space, restaurants, bars and entertainment venues.

Our primary marketing focus in Las Vegas is to maximize gaming revenues and grow revenue per available room, or RevPar. To maximize gaming revenues, we market directly to members of our Club Riviera utilizing customized mail offerings and special promotions to entice players to visit and game at the property. We frequently use complimentary room, food and beverage and entertainment products to increase player visits and gaming revenues. We also use various promotions to entice hotel guests that are not members of Club Riviera to join Club Riviera and game at the property. To grow RevPar, we are leveraging our remodeled hotel rooms and significant convention space to entice meeting planners and convention coordinators to choose Riviera Las Vegas for their events. Moreover, we are showcasing our new hotel room product to grow our tour and travel and internet sales.

In addition to the above, we continuously strive to maximize the number of people who patronize Las Vegas but who are not guests in our hotel. We achieve this by capitalizing on our Las Vegas Strip location, convention center proximity and availability of our entertainment productions and other amenities. We are well situated for walk-in traffic on the Las Vegas Strip near several major properties including the Circus Circus Las Vegas Resort and Casino, LVH (Las Vegas Hotel and Casino), Las Vegas Convention Center, Wynn Las Vegas, Wynn Encore and several timeshare and condominium projects. While we benefit from our proximity to several major properties, the dormant Resorts World Las Vegas (formerly known as Echelon) and Fontainebleau construction projects and the SLS Las Vegas property (formerly known as the Sahara Hotel & Casino) closed for renovation, have caused a major reduction in walk-in traffic. We anticipate that our walk-in traffic will be adversely impacted for the foreseeable future.

Basis of Presentation

In accordance with accounting guidance related to financial reporting by entities in reorganization under the United States Bankruptcy Code, we adopted fresh-start reporting upon the Plan being consummated on April 1, 2011. In connection with the adoption of fresh-start reporting, a new entity was deemed created for financial reporting purposes. Fresh-start reporting generally requires resetting the historical net book value of assets and liabilities to fair value by allocating our enterprise value as set forth in the Plan to our assets and liabilities pursuant to accounting guidance related to business combinations upon emergence from bankruptcy.

The accompanying results of operations for 2011 are presented for two periods: January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 (the "Predecessor Period"), and April 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the "Successor Period"). The Predecessor Period reflects the historical accounting basis in the Predecessor's assets and liabilities, while the Successor Period reflects the assets and liabilities at fair value by allocating the enterprise value to our company's assets and liabilities pursuant to accounting guidance related to business combinations. Moreover, the historical financial results of the Predecessor are not indicative of our current financial condition or our future results of operations. Our future results of operations will be subject to significant business, economic, regulatory and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, some of which are beyond our control.

Prior Period Adjustments

During the second quarter of 2012, we identified errors in our consolidated financial statements for the period April 1 through December 31, 2011 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The errors related to the recording of depreciation and amortization expense associated with our discontinued operation of $1,372,000 for each period, respectively, resulting in an understatement of income from discontinued operations and an overstatement of consolidated net loss for the Successor Period ended December 31, 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $879,000 or $0.10 basic and diluted earnings per share, respectively. We analyzed the potential impact of these errors and concluded that while the correction of these errors was significant to the three months ended June 30, 2012, their correction would not be material to the individual or aggregate periods for 2011 or for the expected full year results for the current year ending December 31, 2012, taking into account the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). In accordance with the relevant guidance, we evaluated the materiality of the errors from a qualitative and quantitative perspective. Based on such evaluation, we concluded that correcting the error of $1,372,000 for the Successor Period ended December 31, 2011 would be immaterial to the expected full year results for 2012 and correcting the error would not have had a material impact on any individual prior period financial statement or affect the trend of financial results from continuing operations. Conversely, we concluded that correcting both the error from the Successor Period and the error of $879,000, net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 in the three months ended June 30, 2012, would be material to our financial results for the three months then ended. Accordingly, we recorded a non-cash adjustment in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to increase income from discontinued operations by $879,000, net of tax. As provided by SAB 108, this portion of the error correction that impacts the results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 will not require the previously filed quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 to be amended and the correction is permitted to be made the next time we file our prior period financial statements. The results for discontinued operations presented for the year-ended December 31, 2012 reflect this adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 (see Note 21 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements).

Results of Operations

The accompanying table shows Predecessor’s results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and the three months ended March 31, 2011, Successor’s results of operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, and the combined results of operations of Predecessor and Successor for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The results for the twelve-months ended December 31, 2011, were derived by the mathematical addition of the results of the three months ended March 31, 2011 Predecessor Period and the nine months ended December 31, 2011 Successor Period. The presentation of financial information for the combined twelve months ended December 31, 2011 herein may yield results not fully comparable on a period-to-period basis, particularly with respect to depreciation, amortization, interest expense and tax provision accounts, as a result of the adoption of fresh-start reporting by us on April 1, 2011 and the sale of RBH. In addition, the combined twelve months ended December 31, 2011 does not comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or with the SEC's rules for pro forma presentation; however, it is presented because we believe that it provides the most meaningful comparison of our results for 2011 to our results for current and prior periods.

The results for the year ended December 31, 2011, which we refer to as "2011 Combined," were derived by the mathematical addition of the results of the Predecessor Period and the Successor Period. The presentation of financial information for 2011 Combined herein may yield results not fully comparable on a period-to-period basis, particularly with respect to depreciation, amortization, interest expense and tax provision accounts, as a result of the adoption of fresh-start reporting by us on April 1, 2011. In addition, 2011 Combined does not comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or with the SEC's rules for pro forma presentation; however, it is presented because we believe that it provides the most meaningful comparison of our results for 2011 to our results for current and prior periods.

2012 Compared to 2011

Revenues

Net revenues for 2012 were $76.4 million, a decrease of $5.3 million, or 6.5%, from $81.7 million for the comparable Combined period in the prior year.

Casino revenues for 2012 were $34.3 million, a decrease of $3.5 million, or 9.3% for the comparable Combined period in the prior year. Casino revenues are comprised primarily of slot machine and table game revenues. In comparison to the Combined period in the prior year, slot machine revenue was $30.7 million, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 1.3%, from $31.1 million and table game revenue was $7.1 million, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 21.4% from $9.0 million. Slot machine win decreased due to lower visitation during 2012 which saw coin-in decrease to $382.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $404.4 million for the comparable Combined period in the prior year, which was partially offset by an increase in hold percentage of 8.0% from 7.7% for the comparable Combined period in the prior year. Table games, on the other hand, saw a substantial increase in volume due to the implementation of our strategy to target gamers that prefer the Baccarat, Pai Gow, and other traditionally Asian style games. Table game drop was $65.2 million for 2012, compared to $47.1 million for the comparable Combined period in the prior year, however, a lower hold percentage of 10.8% in 2012 compared to 19.1% for 2011 Combined significantly reduced revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to comparable Combined period in the prior year.

Room revenues for 2012 were 5.2% lower than for the comparable Combined period in the prior year. The decrease in room revenues was primarily due to a decrease in the Wholesale, Tour and Travel, Casino and Convention channels which was partially offset by an increase in the Retail channel. Occupancy decreased 4.9% to 73.4% for 2012 from 77.2% in the prior year. Our average daily room rate decreased 0.5% to $59.89 in 2012 from $60.20 in 2011. Room revenues included $4.8 million and $6.8 million related to rooms provided to casino guests on a complimentary basis for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These revenues are included in promotional allowances which are deducted from total revenues to arrive at net revenues.

Food and beverage revenues for 2012 declined 6.5% from the comparable Combined period in the prior year. The decrease was due primarily to selective reduction of hours of operation and closure of outlets during low occupancy dates. The reduction was partially offset by an increase in banquet, R Steak, and Java Stop business. Food and beverage revenues included $4.0 million related to food and beverage provided to casino guests on a complimentary basis for both the 2011 Combined and year ended December 31, 2012. These revenues are included in promotional allowances which are deducted from total revenues to arrive at net revenues.

Entertainment revenues for 2012 decreased 45.3% from the comparable Combined period in the prior year. The decrease in entertainment revenues is primarily due to the elimination of ticketed shows in LeBistro Lounge, including The Rat Pack and Dr. Scott, as well as in the Versailles Showroom, which hosted the Dao Chinese acrobats. Additionally, entertainment revenues in the Royale Pavilion decreased as we hosted the Chinese Harvest concert in 2011, but not in 2012. We added several new shows in the Starlite Lounge in late 2011 to help offset this lost revenue. Entertainment revenues included $0.6 million and $1.0 million in revenues related to show tickets offered to guests on a complimentary basis for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These revenues are included in promotional allowances which are deducted from total revenues to arrive at net revenues.

Other revenues for 2012 decreased 11.8% from the comparable Combined period in the prior year. The decrease in other revenues was primarily due to a bundling of WiFi service for hotel guests with other services provided as part of the resort fee. The resort fee was increased to capture the revenues lost by charging separately for this service. There was also a decline in tenant rental income as a result of tenant lease terminations. The prolonged economic downturn made it unprofitable for some tenants to continue operating. There was a decrease in revenue from the business center, as it was closed in May 2012, with the space being leased to the UPS Store, which offset the lost revenues and related additional expenses of self-operating.

Promotional allowances were $9.9 million and $12.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 Combined, respectively. Promotional allowances are comprised of food, beverage, hotel room nights and other items provided on a complimentary basis primarily to our high-value casino players and convention guests. Promotional allowances decreased primarily due to our efforts to focus complimentaries on our best customers.

Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2012 were $123.7 million, an increase of $26.1 million, or 26.8%, from $97.6 million for the comparable Combined period in the prior year.

Casino costs and expenses for 2012 increased 9.6% from the comparable Combined period in the prior year. The increase in casino expenses was primarily due to an increase in table game payroll and related costs as a result of the additional games added during 2012, bad debt reserve adjustment related to the development of more high-end table game play, promotional efforts to drive slot and table game play, and the addition of bingo as an amenity to attract players and drive gaming revenues (which was subsequently closed in July 2012).

Room department costs and expenses for 2012 increased 10.3% from the comparable Combined period in the prior year. Laundry expense increased, primarily as a result of contractual price increases. Convention sales commissions and rebates increased per contractual obligations used to entice groups to have their event at our property. Travel agent commissions increased due to more reservations coming through an internet-based reservation service for which the Company pays commissions. The provision for doubtful accounts increased due to uncollectible balances related to incorrect rate billings.

Food and beverage costs and expenses for 2012 decreased 15.5% from the comparable Combined period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in food and beverage expenses related to the lower volume as explained above.

Entertainment department costs and expenses for 2012 decreased 25.4% as we reduced contract payments to entertainers based on revenue share agreements for new shows, and billed stagehand labor to the producers in the new agreements.

Other operating costs and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, increased as a result of asset impairment charges of $24.8 million in 2012, partially offset by non-recurring costs in 2011 associated with emergence after bankruptcy and costs associated with the sale of our Black Hawk, Colorado operation. As of September 30, 2012, management concluded indicators of goodwill impairment existed and, as required by ASC Topic 350, recorded an estimated impairment loss of $24.8 million in 2012.

Net Loss from Continuing Operations

Net Loss from Continuing Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 Combined were $47.3 million and $15.9 million, respectively.

2011 Compared to 2010

Revenues

Net revenues for 2011 Combined were $81.7 million, an increase of $2.4 million, or 3.0%, from $79.3 million for the comparable period in the prior year.

Casino revenues for 2011 Combined were $37.8 million, an increase of $2.5 million, or 7.2%, from $35.3 million for the comparable period in the prior year. Casino revenues are comprised primarily of slot machine and table game revenues. In comparison to the same period in the prior year, slot machine revenue was $28.3 million, a decrease of $2.9 million, or 9%, from $31.1 million and table game revenue was $9.0 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or 50.0% from $6.0 million. Slot machine win decreased due to lower visitation during 2011 which saw coin-in decrease to $404.4 million for 2011 Combined from $415.2 million in the prior year. Table Games, on the other hand, saw a substantial increase in volume due to the implementation of our strategy to target gamers that prefer the Baccarat, Pai Gow, and other traditionally Asian style games. Table Game drop was $47.1 million for 2011 Combined, compared to $32.3 million in the prior year.

Room revenues for 2011 Combined were 5.6% higher than in the prior year. The increase in room revenues was primarily due to an increase in the Wholesale and Retail channels which more than offset the decline in the Convention channel. Occupancy increased to 77.2% for 2011 Combined from 74.9% in the prior year. Our average daily room rate increased $3.25. These revenues are included in promotional allowances which are deducted from total revenues to arrive at net revenues.

Food and beverage revenues for 2011 Combined declined 1.0% from the prior year. The decrease was due primarily to a reduction in banquet business resulting from the decline in the hotel’s convention/group occupancy. Food and beverage revenues included $4.0 million and $3.5 million related to food and beverage provided to casino guests on a complimentary basis for 2011 Combined and year ended December 31, 2010, respectively. These revenues are included in promotional allowances which are deducted from total revenues to arrive at net revenues.

Entertainment revenues for 2011 Combined decreased 30.3% from the prior year. The decrease in entertainment revenues is primarily due to weak economic conditions resulting in the closure of select entertainment acts and an overall reduction in ticket sales at all entertainment venues. Entertainment revenues included $1.0 million and $2.0 million in revenues related to show tickets offered to guests on a complimentary basis for 2011 Combined and year ended December 31, 2010, respectively. These revenues are included in promotional allowances which are deducted from total revenues to arrive at net revenues.

Other revenues for 2011 Combined decreased 6.6% from the prior year. The decrease in other revenues was primarily due to a decline in tenant rental income as a result of tenant lease terminations. The prolonged economic downturn made it unprofitable for some tenants to continue operating.

Promotional allowances were $12.7 million and $12.3 million for 2011 Combined and year ended December 31, 2010, respectively. Promotional allowances are comprised of food, beverage, hotel room nights and other items provided on a complimentary basis primarily to our high-value casino players and convention guests. Promotional allowances increased primarily due to more complimentary offering redemptions.

Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2011 Combined were $97.6 million, an increase of $5.2 million, or 5.6%, from $92.4 million for the comparable period in the prior year.

Casino costs and expenses for 2011 Combined increased 29.1% from the prior year. The increase in casino expenses was primarily due to an increase in table game payroll and related costs as a result of the additional games added during the year, and a full year of operation of the Party Pit, which opened in October of 2010.

Room department costs and expenses for 2011 Combined increased 2.5% from the prior year, which is in line with the 2.9% increase in occupancy.

Food and beverage costs and expenses for 2011 Combined decreased 3.7% from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in food and beverage expenses related to the lower banquet volume as explained above. In addition, reductions in payroll and related costs also contributed to the improvement.

Entertainment department costs and expenses for 2011 Combined decreased 14.0% as we had fewer shows during 2011 Combined.

Other operating costs and expenses increased as a result of the emergence from bankruptcy including the additional professional fees required to implement fresh-start reporting, the costs associated with marketing the Riviera Black Hawk for sale, and the costs associated with marketing the Las Vegas property.

Net Loss from Continuing Operations

Net Loss from Continuing Operations for 2011 Combined and the year ended December 31, 2010 were $15.9 million and $13.0 million, respectively.

Discontinued Operations

On September 29, 2011, we entered into the Stock Purchase Agreement to sell our Black Hawk, Colorado operation. We have reflected the operation as a discontinued operation and the related assets and liabilities as held for sale through the sale completion date of April 26, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

We had $76.5 million and $21.0 million in cash and cash equivalents (of which $62.6 million and $272,000, respectively, was restricted) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Additionally, effective April 1, 2011, the Company generally has the ability to draw up to $10 million against its Working Capital Facility and has significantly reduced its debt service burden. However, due to the defaults under the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, we do not currently have the ability to draw any additional funds under the Working Capital Facility until such time as the defaults are cured or waived. As a result of the defaults, the Required Lenders (as defined in the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement, respectively) have the ability to increase the interest accruing on amounts owed under the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement, respectively. An increase in the interest rate would negatively affect our available cash and results from operations. Further, the Required Lenders and administrative agent under the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement, respectively, have the right to accelerate repayment of all amounts owed under each credit agreement and require us to repay such amounts immediately. We believe that we currently have sufficient funds to do so. However, in the event that we were required to repay all such amounts owed, we would not have sufficient capital resources to cover our operating losses and would need to obtain additional capital, including equity financing, debt financing or capital contributions from stockholders, if available to us. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. The inability to obtain additional capital will restrict our ability to grow and inhibit our ability to continue to conduct business operations. Any additional equity financing may result in substantial dilution to our then existing stockholders. We do not provide any guarantees or assurances that the Company will have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet future financial obligations. In the absence of acceleration of the amounts owed under the Series A Credit Agreement and the Series B Credit Agreement, we believe that the Company has sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet debt service and normal course expenditures.

Our cash and cash equivalents decreased $6.9 million during 2012 compared to the prior year primarily due to cash used in operating activities of $10.5 million and $7.5 million in net cash used in by investing activities, and $11.1 million of cash supplied from unrestricted cash proceeds from the sale of RBH.

The $7.5 million in net cash used in investing activities was primarily related to capital expenditures to update the casino floor, update a portion of room inventory, renovate a restaurant, and perform maintenance and safety related improvements at the Riviera Las Vegas.

Series A Credit Agreement

The information set forth under the caption “Series A Credit Agreement” in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements is incorporated herein by reference.

Series B Credit Agreement

The information set forth under the caption “Series B Credit Agreement” in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements is incorporated herein by reference.

Current Economic Environment

We believe that a number of factors are affecting consumer sentiment and behavior, including the continued economic slowdown, high unemployment and decreasing home values. We believe that consumers have and will continue to save more and spend less on discretionary items such as vacations and gaming. Thus, we believe that the outlook for the gaming and hospitality industries remains highly uncertain. Based on these adverse circumstances, we believe that the Company will continue to experience lower than historical hotel occupancy, room rates and casino volumes.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012 ($ in thousands):

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

It is not our usual business practice to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements such as guarantees on loans and financial commitments, indemnification arrangements and retained interests in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity for securitization purposes. Consequently, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to adopt accounting policies and to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and provision for income taxes. We periodically evaluate our policies, and our estimates and assumptions related to these policies. We operate in a highly regulated industry. We are subject to regulations governing operating and internal control procedures. The majority of our casino revenue is in the form of cash, personal checks or gaming chips, which by their nature do not require complex estimations. We estimate certain liabilities with payment periods that extend for longer than several months. Such estimates include the liability associated with customer loyalty programs, the cost of workers compensation, property and casualty insurance settlements and the cost of litigation. We believe that these estimates are reasonable based upon our past experience with our business and based upon our assumptions related to possible outcomes in the future. Future actual results might differ materially from these estimates.

We have determined that the following accounting policies and related estimates are critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements because such estimates are highly uncertain or susceptible to change so as to present a significant risk of a material impact on our financial condition or operating performance, and such policies and estimates were selected from among available alternatives, or require the exercise of significant management judgment to apply.

Goodwill, Intangibles and Other Long-lived Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations.  In accordance with accounting guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets, we test for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually in the fourth quarter of each year and in certain situations between those annual dates.

 Goodwill for relevant reporting units is tested for impairment using a discounted cash flow model based on the estimated future results of the Company’s reporting units, discounted using the Company’s weighted-average cost of capital and market indicators of terminal year capitalization rates.  The implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to the carrying value of that goodwill.  The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to its assets and liabilities, and the amount remaining, if any, is the implied fair value of goodwill.  If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than its carrying value, then it is written down to its implied fair value.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to compromise, but are tested for impairment using a discounted cash flow approach. Intangible assets with a definite life are amortized over their useful life, which is the period over which the asset is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. Management periodically assesses the amortization period of intangible assets with definite lives based upon estimated future cash flows from related operations.

 Inherent in the reviews of the carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible assets are various estimates. Future cash flow estimates are, by their nature, subjective, and actual results may differ materially from our estimates. If our ongoing estimates of future cash flows are not met, we may have to record additional impairment charges in future accounting periods. Our estimates of cash flows are based on the current regulatory, political and economic climates, recent operating information and budgets of the various properties where we conduct operations. These estimates could be negatively impacted by changes in federal, state or local regulations, economic downturns, or other events affecting various forms of travel and access to our properties.

We have a significant investment in long-lived property and equipment. We evaluate our property and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment. For assets to be disposed of, we recognize the asset to be sold at the lower of carrying value or fair market value less costs of disposal. Fair market value for assets to be disposed of is generally estimated based on comparable asset sales, solicited offers or a discounted cash flow model. For assets to be held and used, we review fixed assets for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. Because an indicator of impairment existed as of October 1, 2012, we compared the estimated future cash flows of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of the asset. The undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value, and impairment was not recorded.

Income Taxes

The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States. Authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes requires that we account for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax assets, net of applicable reserves, and deferred tax liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on the income tax provision and deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes also requires that we perform an assessment of positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment includes the evaluation of the future reversal of temporary tax differences, the nature and frequency of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future taxable income and implementation of tax planning strategies.

Significant judgment is required in evaluating the Company’s tax positions and determining its provision for income taxes. Authoritative guidance regarding uncertainty in income taxes provides a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely, based solely on the technical merits, of being sustained on examination. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues. Any unforeseen change in customers’ liquidity or financial condition could adversely affect our ability to collect account balances and our operating results.

Self-insurance Provisions

We are self-insured for various levels of general liability and workers’ compensation. To resolve ongoing claims related to our previous self-insurance program, we maintained reinsurance occurrence-based coverage to cover us until all applicable claims were resolved. Insurance claims and provisions include accruals of estimated settlements for known claims as well as accrued estimates of incurred but not reported claims. In estimating these costs, we consider our historical claims experience and make judgments about the expected levels of costs per claim. Changes in health care costs, accident frequency and severity and other factors can materially affect the estimate for these liabilities.

Loyalty Club Program

We offer to our players club members the opportunity to earn points based on their level of gaming activities. Points can be redeemed for free play, promotions, complimentary hotel rooms, entertainment, and food and beverage. We accrue the cash-equivalent value of points earned based upon expected redemption rates.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350) Testing of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. ASU No. 2012-02 amends the impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets by allowing companies to first assess the qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset might be impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test.  The changes to the ASC as a result of this update are effective prospectively for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 (January 1, 2013 for the Company).  The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued amendments to guidance regarding the presentation of comprehensive income. The amendments eliminate the option to present components of Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”) as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The amendments require that comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. In a single continuous statement, the entity would present the components of net income and total net income, the components of OCI and a total of OCI, along with the total of comprehensive income in that statement. In the two-statement approach, the entity would present components of net income and total net income in the statement of net income and a statement of OCI would immediately follow the statement of net income and include the components of OCI and a total for OCI, along with a total for comprehensive income. The amendments also require the entity to present on the face of the financial statements any reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from OCI to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of OCI are presented. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in OCI, when an item of OCI must be reclassified to net income or the option to present components of OCI either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects. The amendments, excluding the specific requirement to present on the face of the financial statements any reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from OCI to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of OCI are presented which was deferred by the FASB in December 2011, are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively. The Company adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2012, which did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to existing fair value measurement guidance in order to achieve common requirements for measuring fair value and disclosures in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and International Financial Reporting Standards. The guidance clarifies how a principal market is determined, addresses the fair value measurement of instruments with offsetting market or counterparty credit risks, addresses the concept of valuation premise and highest and best use, extends the prohibition on blockage factors to all three levels of the fair value hierarchy and requires additional disclosures. The amendments are to be applied prospectively and are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2012, which did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under review and study by standard-setting organizations and certain regulatory agencies. Because of the tentative and preliminary nature of such proposed standards, we have not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of any such proposed or revised standards would have on our consolidated financial statements.

At times, we are exposed to market risk from adverse changes in interest rates with respect to the short-term floating interest rate on borrowings under our credit agreements. As of December 31, 2012, we had $76.9 million in borrowings outstanding under our credit agreements. Any borrowings outstanding accrue interest at LIBOR plus a margin determined by the credit agreements or an alternative rate based on the federal funds rate. As of December 31, 2012, if LIBOR rates were to increase or decrease by one percentage point, our interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $0.8 million per year.

Our consolidated financial statements, including the notes to all such statements and other supplementary data are included in this report beginning on page F-1.

None.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15(d)-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. These include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2012.  

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Limitations of the Effectiveness of Internal Control

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any internal control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

None

Director Qualifications

The Board consists of four members. The Board believes that it is necessary for each of the Company’s directors to possess many qualities and skills. When searching for new candidates, the Board considers the evolving needs of the Board and searches for candidates that fill any current or anticipated future gap. The Board also believes that all directors must possess a considerable amount of business management and educational experience. The Board first considers a candidate’s management experience and then considers issues of judgment, background, stature, conflicts of interest, integrity, ethics and commitment when considering director candidates. The Board also focuses on education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. In considering candidates for the Board, the Board considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards. With respect to the nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to the Board are also considered. All our directors bring to the Board a wealth of executive leadership experience derived from their service in various leadership capacities in the private and public sectors.

Directors

The following table presents information as of March 29, 2013 regarding our directors and the directors of Riviera Operating Corporation (“ROC”), our wholly-owned subsidiary:

Each of the directors was appointed to the Board as of the Substantial Consummation Date pursuant to the Plan. Each of Messrs. Sternlicht, Stevens, Alvarado and Choy were designated to the Board pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement described in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. The directors will hold these positions until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Provided below are descriptions and the backgrounds of our directors and their principal occupations for the past five years.

Barry S. Sternlicht, age 52, is the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and owner of Starwood Capital Group, a private investment firm he formed in 1991, and its related entities. Entities affiliated with Starwood Capital Group collectively own approximately 43% of the outstanding Class B Non-Voting Common Stock, and Desert Rock Enterprises LLC (which is managed and partly owned by Derek Stevens) and an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Sternlicht collectively own 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Riviera Voteco, L.L.C., which in turn owns 100% of the Class A Voting Common Stock. Mr. Sternlicht is also Chairman of Starwood Property Trust, a mortgage REIT trading on the NYSE under the symbol STWD and is also Chairman of the Board of Baccarat, S.A. and TRI Pointe Homes, Inc. From 1995 through early 2005, Sternlicht was Chairman and CEO of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., a company he founded in 1995. Mr. Sternlicht is a trustee of Brown University. He serves on the Board of Directors of The Estée Lauder Companies, Restoration Hardware, Ellen Tracy, and Field & Stream. He is the Chairman of the Board of the Robin Hood Foundation and serves on the boards of the Pension Real Estate Association, the Nantucket Dreamland Foundation, and the Americans for the Arts. He received his BA, magna cum laude, with honors from Brown University. He later earned an M.B.A. with distinction from Harvard Business School.

Marcos Alvarado, age 32, is a Senior Vice President of Starwood Capital Group responsible for the origination, underwriting, structuring and execution of investments in all property types across the capital stack with a geographic focus on New York City, as well as real estate-related corporate transactions. Mr. Alvarado serves on the Board of Directors of Opus Bank, a California-based commercial bank, and Northwest Management, the holding company for the assets of Corus Bancshares.  He is also a member of the Executive Committee of ST Residential. Prior to joining Starwood Capital Group in 2008, Mr. Alvarado was a Vice President in Lehman Brothers’ Global Real Estate Group, and prior to that he worked in Morgan Stanley’s CMBS group. Mr. Alvarado holds a BA from Dartmouth College.

Derek J. Stevens, age 45, is part-owner of and manages Desert Rock Enterprises LLC, through which he has been involved in the management of the Golden Gate Casino since March 2008. Desert Rock Enterprises LLC owns approximately 12% of the outstanding Class B Non-Voting Common Stock, and Desert Rock Enterprises LLC and an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Sternlicht collectively own 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Riviera Voteco, L.L.C., which in turn owns 100% of the Class A Voting Common Stock. Mr. Stevens is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Golden Gate Casino, a position he has held since September 2009. In addition, Mr. Stevens controls The Cold Heading Co., Ajax Metal Processing, Inc. and Wolverine Carbide & Tool, Inc. He has been found suitable in both Nevada and Colorado. Mr. Stevens is a 1990 graduate of the University of Michigan. He received an M.B.A. in finance from Wayne State University in 1994.

Andy Choy, age 37, previously served as a manager at the Venetian Las Vegas from August 2007 to July 2008 and as a Senior Vice President at the Venetian Macao from August 2008 to November 2009, and from December 2009 to March 2011 as a consultant. Prior to that, Mr. Choy served interim senior management roles within Carl Icahn’s portfolio of distressed assets. Mr. Choy is a 1996 graduate of the University of California, Berkeley. He received an M.B.A. in business administration from Stanford University Graduate School of Business in 2002.

Executive Officers

The following table presents information as of April 1, 2013 regarding our and ROC’s executive officers:

Messrs. Choy and Marchionne were appointed to the positions indicated above as of the Substantial Consummation Date. Mr. Roshetko was appointed to the positions indicated above on September 24, 2012. Our officers serve at the discretion of the Board and are also subject to the licensing requirements of the Nevada Gaming Commission.

Provided below are descriptions and the backgrounds of Messrs. Roshetko and Marchionne. Mr. Choy’s background is described above.

Mr. Roshetko, age 54, is a Certified Public Accountant and brings over 25 years of experience in the hospitality industry, primarily in the area of finance and accounting. Before joining the Company, Mr. Roshetko was the Principal of Roshetko Consulting from October 2007, providing temporary and part-time CFO and consulting services to a variety of clients in the hospitality and real estate industries. Mr. Roshetko also served as a Member of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the Herbst Gaming bankruptcy from April 2008 through January 2011, after having served as the Director of Corporate Finance at Herbst Gaming, a casino operator, between April 2007 and September 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Roshetko served as Executive Vice President and Division Chief Financial Officer for MGM Resorts International, a global hospitality company, between March 1999 and April 2007, during which time his division grew to eight hotel/casinos. Mr. Roshetko also served as Vice President and Treasurer of Primadonna Resorts, Inc., a hospitality company, from August 1996 until it was acquired by MGM Resorts International in March 1999. Mr. Roshetko served as Vice President of Finance and Administration for President Casinos, Inc., a gaming company and casino operator, between June 1993 and June 1996. Mr. Roshetko also served in a variety of senior finance and accounting positions for Aztar Corporation, a hospitality company, and its predecessor Ramada Inc., a hospitality company, between June 1987 and June 1993. Mr. Roshetko received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from The University of Akron in 1981, and received a Master of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix in 1991.

Tullio J. Marchionne, age 58, has served as our secretary since February 2000. Mr. Marchionne served as a Co-CEO between April 2010 and March 2011 and as our General Counsel between January 2000 and March 2011. Mr. Marchionne was initially employed by Riviera, Inc., in June 1986 as a casino dealer and served in various capacities including Pit Manager, General Counsel and Director of Gaming Administration until September 1996, when he was transferred to the Four Queens Hotel and Casino as Director of Casino Operations pursuant to the management agreement our subsidiary had with the Four Queens. He served in that position until May 1997. Mr. Marchionne served as the General Manager of the Regency Casino Thessaloniki, located in Thessaloniki, Greece, from June 1997 until December 1997. Mr. Marchionne served as a Casino Supervisor with Bally’s Las Vegas from February 1998 until June 1998, Director of Casino Operations at the Maxim Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas from June 1998 until November 1998 and Director of Table Games at the Resort at Summerlin from November 1998 until December 1999.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act (Section 16(a)) requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC certain reports regarding ownership of our common stock. Such persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of such reports that were furnished to us by those reporting persons in connection with certain of those reporting requirements, we believe that all the reporting persons met their Section 16(a) reporting obligations on a timely basis during 2012.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted certain ethical policies that apply to all of our employees at the level of supervisor or higher, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. Those policies, together with certain rules adopted by our Disclosure Committee, comprise what we consider to be our code of ethics. Those policies and rules are available on our Internet web site at www.rivierahotel.com by clicking on the “Investor Relations” link and may also be obtained upon request without charge by writing to the Secretary of the Company.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company believes that Marcos Alvarado, member of the Audit Committee, is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 407(d)(5)(ii). None of the Company’s securities are listed on any national securities exchange of securities market. As a result, the Company is not subject to any requirement that its directors be considered “independent.”

Item 11.         Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION

Executive Compensation  

The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the following type of executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and for 2011 Combined: (i) individuals who served as, or acted in the capacity of, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012; (ii) the Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers, other than the Company’s current principal executive officer and principal financial officer, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012; and (iii) up to two additional individuals, other than the Company’s current principal executive officer and principal financial officer, for whom disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer of the Company at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. We refer to these individuals collectively as our “Named Executive Officers”.

(1) Changes in Officers of the Company:

Upon the Substantial Consummation Date, Andy Choy was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. Tullio Marchionne resigned his position as Co-CEO of the Company effective March 31, 2011, and retained his title as Secretary of the Company. Larry King joined the company as Chief Financial Officer on April 19, 2011 and separated from this position on September 24, 2012 and assumed an advisory role through October 20, 2012. The Company agreed to compensate Mr. King through January 20, 2013. Paul Roshetko joined the Company as Chief Financial Officer on September 24, 2012.

(2) Includes payment for auto allowance, executive life insurance, and a bonus paid prior to emergence from bankruptcy.

Compensation discussion and analysis

The following descriptions of our compensation agreements, plans and programs are intended to assist in your reading and understanding of the information reported in the Summary Compensation table above and the related footnotes. 

Compensation Objectives

Our named executive officers (“NEOs”) are our Chief Executive Officer and President, our Chief Financial Officer, our Secretary, our Senior Vice President of Gaming Development, and our Vice President of Hotel Operations.  We seek to compensate our NEOs in a manner that will attract and retain qualified individuals who are responsible for the management, growth and success of the Company.  We believe that NEO compensation should be designed to:

1.  motivate performance in areas consistent with our short and long-term objectives,

2.  reward for achieving those objectives, and

3.  encourage NEOs to continue in our employ.

We evaluate and establish the total compensation of our NEOs in light of what we believe to be the compensation practices, and relative corporate financial performance, of other companies in the gaming industry similar to us in terms of asset size and target market.  We do not engage in a formal benchmarking study.  Because many of these companies are not publicly held, their compensation practices are not published publicly.  As such, we rely on the industry experience and knowledge of our Board of Directors in determining appropriate NEO compensation.

Compensation Elements

Our NEO compensation program has one primary component, which is annual salary.

 Annual Salary:  The salary element compensates each NEO for performance of the fundamental duties associated with that NEOs position.  In addition to what we believe to be the compensation practices and relative corporate financial performance of other companies in the gaming industry similar to us in terms of asset size and target market, we consider other factors in establishing NEO annual salaries including the executive’s respective record of leadership and service to us, our growth during the NEOs term of employment, the relative importance of the NEO in overseeing both our strategic direction and our day-to-day operations, the relative performance of our competitors, and civic leadership in the Las Vegas area.  Salaries are reviewed annually and are adjusted as warranted. 

Other Benefits and Compensation

 The NEOs also participate in our other benefit plans on the same basis as other employees.  The plans include subsidized health insurance benefits and company paid life insurance.

Board Process

 The Board considers and approves all compensation to the NEOs.  The Board reviews the performance and the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and President and sets his compensation after discussion of performance and performance metrics.  For the remaining NEOs, the Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Board that generally are approved. The Board of Directors believes that it is appropriate for the Company not to have a Compensation Committee. All directors participate in the consideration of executive officer and director compensation.

Compensation Committee Report

The Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Board has determined that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this report Form 10-K.

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically request that the information be treated as “soliciting material” or specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as Amended or the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Board Members Participating in Compensation Committee Functions

Barry Sternlicht

Marcos Alvarado

Derek Stevens

Andy Choy

Employment Agreements and Payments Upon Change of Control or Termination

Employment Agreements

On May 9, 2012, the Company entered into (a) an Employment Agreement with Andy Choy for his service as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “Choy Agreement”), and (b) an Employment Agreement with Larry King for his service as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer (the “King Agreement,” and together with the Choy Agreement, collectively, the “Employment Agreements,” and individually, an “Employment Agreement”). The Choy Agreement is effective as of April 1, 2011, and the King Agreement is effective as of April 19, 2011, which dates represent the executives’ respective dates of appointment. The terms of the Employment Agreements are identical other than as stated below.

The Employment Agreements provide for an initial term of three years. Absent written notice by the Company to the executive no less than 30 days before the expiration of the initial term, such executive’s Employment Agreement automatically renews for one additional year.

The Choy Agreement provides that Mr. Choy will earn an annual base salary of $450,000, and the King Agreement provides that Mr. King will earn an annual base salary of $240,000. The Employment Agreements provide that the Company will implement a bonus plan during 2012 in which the executives may participate. Further, the Employment Agreements require the Company to enter into an agreement with each executive setting forth the terms of executive bonus plan and incentive programs in which such executive will be eligible to participate. The Company has not yet implemented any bonus plan nor entered into any agreement with any executive officer concerning any bonus plan or incentive programs.

During the term of the Employment Agreements, the executive is entitled to participate in such of the Company’s benefit plans as are generally made available from time to time to the Company’s senior executives. Mr. Choy is entitled to 28 business days, and Mr. King 23 business days, paid time off in each calendar year (which were prorated for 2011), and unused paid time off may be carried-over from year to year. Upon the executive’s request, the Company is obligated to pay such executive the cash value of accrued but unused paid off time.

The executives are subject to certain restrictive covenants upon termination of employment. For a period of six months, in the case of Mr. Choy, and three months, in the case of Mr. King, following termination of employment for any reason or no reason, the executive may not engage in certain competitive conduct, further described in the Employment Agreements, within a 100-mile radius of the Company’s hotel and casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. This non-compete covenant does not apply upon the occurrence of certain change of control events and the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. Further, for a period of 18 months after termination of employment, the executive may not (a) share with competitors or their affiliates certain information pertaining to advertisers, suppliers, vendors, independent contractors, brokers, partners, patrons, executives or customers (collectively referred to as “business contacts” in the Employment Agreements) of the Company, or certain prospective business contacts, and (b) solicit business contacts or employees. Each executive also has agreed to keep certain information with respect to the Company and its business affiliates confidential for a period of five years after termination of such executive’s employment.

The foregoing description of the Choy Agreement and the King Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Choy Agreement and the King Agreement, which are attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1 and Exhibit 10.2, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Payments Upon Termination of Employment

On September 24, 2012, Mr. King separated from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and remained with the Company in an advisory capacity until October 20, 2012. Upon his final separation from the Company, the Company paid Mr. King cash severance in an amount equal to $60,000, or 3 months base salary, and provided continuation of health care benefits for him and his dependents for a period of six months. The Company estimates that the cash value of the continuation of health care benefits is $10,210. The total cash value of Mr. King’s severance package is estimated to be $70,210.

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment

In general, if Mr. Choy’s employment is terminated (regardless of the reason therefor), the Company would pay or cause to be paid to Mr. Choy all accrued but unpaid annual base salary and any incurred but unpaid business expenses. All benefits provided to Mr. Choy under his employment agreement may be continued subject to the terms and conditions of such benefits.

In addition, Mr. Choy would be entitled to receive (a) earned and awarded bonuses for the year prior to termination except if the Company terminates Mr. Choy’s employment for Cause (as defined below) or Mr. Choy voluntarily terminates his employment, and (b) payout of earned but unused paid time off except if the Company terminates Mr. Choy’s employment for Cause.

If the Company terminates Mr. Choy’s employment without Cause, in addition to the payments or benefits specified above, Mr. Choy would be entitled to receive:

The following table sets forth the amounts payable under Mr. Choy’s employment agreement in the event of a termination by the Company without Cause. The amounts in the table assume that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2012.

The Company defines “Disability” as executive's incapacity, certified by a licensed physician selected by the Company, which precludes executive from performing the essential functions of his duties for any consecutive period of 2 months.

The Company defines “Cause” as (a) any breach by executive of any of his material obligations under his employment agreement; (b) consistent neglect or failure to perform executive’s duties and responsibilities consistent with his positions; (c) a material violation of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy, or (d) conviction or plea of nolo contendere to a felony involving moral turpitude.

Under certain circumstances, any payment on account of termination of Mr. Choy’s employment which is deemed to be “deferred compensation” under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A will be delayed for six months after the termination.

It is a condition to Mr. Choy’s right to receive severance payments and benefits under his employment agreement that he execute a general release in favor of the Company. Certain non-competition and non-solicitation covenants apply to Mr. Choy for specified periods following the termination of employment under certain circumstances but these covenants are not conditions to his right to receive severance payments or benefits under the employment agreement.

Stay Put Bonus Agreements

On October 8, 2012, the Company entered into substantially identical Stay Put Bonus Agreements with each of Andy Choy, Paul Roshetko, Tullio Marchionne, Noah Acres and Johannes Franken. Pursuant to the Stay Put Bonus Agreements, if the Company “Closes a Transaction” (as defined below) on or before December 31, 2013, each executive is entitled to receive a cash stay bonus, less applicable taxes and withholding amounts, generally payable on the fifth day after the closing of such transaction. However, an executive is not entitled to any stay bonus if an executive voluntarily leaves his employment with the Company or is discharged for “Cause) (as defined below) before the payment date for the stay bonus. In the case of Messrs. Choy, Marchionne, Acres and Franken, the stay bonus is equal to a multiple of such executive’s monthly base salary. In the case of Mr. Roshetko, the stay bonus is equal to $25,000. The table below sets forth information about the stay bonuses the executives would have been entitled to receive if the Company had Closed a Transaction as of December 31, 2012.

The Stay Put Bonus Agreement define the term "Closes a Transaction" as any of the following that are consented to in writing by the Company, whether through one transaction or a series of transactions: any merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, business combination or other transaction pursuant to which all or substantially all of the business, assets or equity interests of the Company are acquired by, or combined with, any person, group of persons, partnership, corporation or other entity (including, without limitation, existing creditors, employees, affiliates, and/or shareholders of the Company).

The Stay Put Bonus Agreement define the term “Cause” to mean the occurrence of any of the following: (i) conviction or a plea of non contendere to a felony, (ii) consistent neglect or failure to perform duties and responsibilities consistent with the executive’s positions; (iii) a material violation of Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy; or (iv) the gaming authorities of the State of Nevada or any other state in which the Company conducts gaming operations determining that the executive is unsuitable to act as an employee of a gaming company in his individual capacity.

Restricted Stock Plan

The Company terminated its restricted stock plan upon the Substantial Consummation Date. No awards under the restricted stock plan were made in 2011 and 2010.

Stock Option Plans and Stock Grants

Since the Substantial Consummation Date, the Company has not maintained any compensation plans or individual compensation arrangements under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance. None of the Named Executive Officers were granted stock options or other incentive awards in 2012, 2011 or 2010. During 2012 and as of December 31, 2012, there were no stock options, unvested stock or equity incentive plan awards issued and outstanding. 

Additional Benefits

We offer a number of other benefits to executive officers pursuant to benefit programs that provide for broad-based employee participation.  These programs include long-term and short-term disability insurance, life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, employee assistance and certain other benefits.

Our 401(k) plan and other generally available benefit programs allow us to remain competitive for employee talent, and we believe that the availability of the benefit programs generally enhances employee productivity and loyalty.  The main objectives of our benefit programs are to give our employees access to quality health care, financial protection from unforeseen events, assistance in achieving retirement financial goals and enhanced health and productivity, in compliance with applicable legal requirements.  These generally available benefits typically do not specifically factor into our calculation or evaluation of an individual executive’s total compensation or equity award-based package.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

We did not offer any compensation to our directors for their service as such for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 12.         Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The Company has two classes of common stock: Class A Voting Common Stock and Class B Non-Voting Common Stock. Only the Class A Voting Common Stock is a voting security. The following tables contain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A Voting Common Stock and Class B Non-Voting Common Stock as of April 1, 2013, by (i) each of our directors and each of our Named Executive Officers, and (ii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. With respect to our Class A Voting Common Stock, one of the tables below contains information regarding the beneficial ownership by each person who, to our knowledge, beneficially owns more than 5% of the Class A Voting Common Stock. The percentage of outstanding shares of common stock represented by each named person’s stock ownership assumes the exercise by such person of all stock warrants beneficially owned by such person that are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2013, but does not assume the exercise of stock warrants by any other persons. The percentage of outstanding stock represented by the stock ownership of all of our directors and executive officers as a group assumes the exercise by all members of that group of stock warrants beneficially owned by such members that are exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2013, but does not assume the exercise of options by any persons outside of that group. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the tables, each person listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such person’s name. The address for each director and executive officer is c/o Riviera Holdings Corporation, 2901 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

As of December 31, 2012, the Company did not maintain any compensation plans or individual compensation arrangements under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Item 13.         Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Transactions with Related Persons

During 2012, the Company paid an aggregate of $0.1 million of expenses associated with gaming authority licensing in Nevada and Colorado on behalf of Desert Rock Enterprises. Mr. Stevens is a member of our Board and managing member of Desert Rock Enterprises. Further, Mr. Stevens owns 12% of our Class B Non-Voting Common Stock (which shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stock are directly owned by Desert Rock Enterprises).

During 2011, the Company paid an aggregate of $1.0 million of expenses associated with gaming authority licensing in Nevada and Colorado on behalf of Starwood Capital Entities. Mr. Sternlicht is our Chairman of the Board and is also the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and owner of Starwood Capital Group and its related entities. Further, Mr. Sternlicht beneficially owns 100% of the shares of our Class A Voting Common Stock and approximately 43% of the shares of our Class B Non-Voting Common Stock (which shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stock are directly owned by entities related to Starwood Capital Group). In addition, Marcos Alvarado, one of our directors, is an employee of an entity related to Starwood Capital Group.

Although not in writing, the Board engages in discussions regarding related party transactions reflecting our Board’s understanding of policies and procedures which give our Board the power to approve or disapprove potential related party transactions of our directors and executive officers, their immediate family members and entities where they hold a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest. Our Board is charged with reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances of a related party transaction, including if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.

Director Independence

The Board is comprised of individuals with a direct and/or indirect financial interest in the Company, or who are part of the senior management team. As such, none of our directors is independent.

Item 14.         Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Audit Fees

We were billed by our principal accountants, Ernst & Young, a total of $250,000 for 2012 and $380,000 for 2011 for their audits of our annual consolidated financial statements and their reviews of our consolidated financial statements in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the respective years.

Audit-Related Fees

We were billed $245,000 by Ernst & Young in 2012 and $171,100 in 2011 for audit-related services associated with the sale of RBH and our potential debt restructuring that are not reported above in “Audit Fees”.

Tax Fees

We were billed $118,500 and $277,200 by Ernst & Young in 2012 and 2011, respectively, for tax services associated with our potential restructuring, the sale of RBH, and general advisory services.

All Other Fees

We were not billed by Ernst & Young for other professional services in fiscal years 2012 and 2011.

PART IV

Item 15.         Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)         List of Financial Statements

The following is a list of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Reports and the Company’s consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(a)(2)         List of Financial Statement Schedules

No financial statement schedules have been filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K because they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

(a)(3)         List of Exhibits

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index herein, which information is incorporated herein by reference, and such exhibits are filed herewith.

(b)          The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(c)          Not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Riviera Holdings Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Riviera Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, shareholder’s equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012 (Successor), the nine-month period ending December 31, 2011 (Successor), the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 (Predecessor) and the year ended December 31, 2010 (Predecessor). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Riviera Holdings Corporation at December 31, 2012 (Successor) and 2011 (Successor), and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012 (Successor), the nine-month period ended December 31, 2011 (Successor), the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 (Predecessor) and the year ended December 31, 2010 (Predecessor), in conformity with US generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recurring losses from operations and has a working capital deficiency. In addition, the Company is in default under the loan agreements with its shareholders. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on December 1, 2010 the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada entered a written order confirming the Debtors’ Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization, which became effective on April 1, 2011. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification 852-10, Reorganizations, for the Successor company as a new entity with assets, liabilities and a capital structure having carrying amounts not comparable with prior periods as described in Note 1.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada

April 1, 2013

RIVIERA HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011

(In thousands, except share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

RIVIERA HOLDINGS CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)