1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ORTIZ v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION
 

ORTIZ v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION

No. C-12-05859(EDL).

ELIZABETH ORTIZ and GAIL MILLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

October 15, 2013.

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE CASES

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge.

This case is a putative class action against Defendants CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc., for off-the-clock work by non-exempt employees. The plaintiffs in Howard v. CVS Caremark Corp., No. 13-4009 (NC), have filed an administrative motion to relate their case to this one. Docket No. 41. Defendants oppose the motion to relate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases