1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 962 N.E.2d
  5. 962 N.E.2d 663 (2012)
 

APEX 1 PROCESSING, INC. v. EDWARDS

No. 49A05-1103-PL-85.

962 N.E.2d 663 (2012)

APEX 1 PROCESSING, INC., Appellant-Defendant, v. Akeala EDWARDS, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

January 20, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas B. King , Matthew M. Adolay , Wooden & McLaughlin LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

Susan Verbonitz , Weir & Partners LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Attorney pro hac vice.

Irwin B. Levin , Richard E. Shevitz , Vess A. Miller , Cohen & Malad, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Apex 1 Processing, a "payday loan" business, includes in its loan contracts a compulsory arbitration provision. Akeala Edwards brought a class action1 alleging Apex, doing business as payday lender Paycheck Today, engaged in unfair trade practices. Apex moved to compel arbitration of Edwards' claim, but the trial court denied the motion because the arbitrator designated in the contract was no longer permitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases