KOBE v. HALEY

C/A No. 3:11-1146-TMC.

Kobe and Mark, Plaintiffs, v. Nikki Haley, in her capacity as Governor and Chairman of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board; Daniel Cooper, Converse Chellis and Mark Sanford, in their capacities as former members of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board; Hugh Leatherman and Richard Eckstrom, in their capacities as members of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board; Curtis Loftis and Brian White, as members of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board, Anthony Keck, in his capacity as the Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Emma Forkner, in her capacity as the former Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Beverly Buscemi in her capacity as Director of the South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs, Eugene A. Laurent, former Interim Director of the South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs; Stanley Butkus, former Director of the South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs; Richard Huntress, in his capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs; Kathi Lacy, Thomas P. Waring and Jacob Chorey, in their capacities as employees of the South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs, Mary Leitner, in her capacity as the Director of the Richland Lexington Disabilities and Special Needs Board; the Babcock Center, Judy Johnson, in her capacity as the Director of the Babcock Center and other Unnamed Actors Associated with the Babcock Center, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division.

August 12, 2013.


OPINION & ORDER

TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.

In their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs seek actual and punitive damages, and declaratory and injunctive relief for violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12132; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("Section 504"); the Medicaid Act;1 and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. (ECF No. 65 — Am. Compl. at 3). This...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases