1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MEADE v. CARDINALE & JACKSON CROSSING ASSOCIATES, LLC
 

MEADE v. CARDINALE & JACKSON CROSSING ASSOCIATES, LLC

No. A-3358-11T1.

MARK C. MEADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARDINALE & JACKSON CROSSING ASSOCIATES, LLC, VITO CARDINALE, FRANK MOZINO, NICK PONZIO AND DANA POLCE, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 31, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Meade, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Paul L. LaSalle argued the cause for respondents ( Cleary Giacobbe Alfieri Jacobs , attorneys; Mr. LaSalle, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Lihotz and Kennedy.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the Law Division's order of December 13, 2011, dismissing with prejudice certain claims, and allegations against some defendants, asserted in his amended complaint, and dismissing without prejudice other claims and parties, directing that the matter be referred to arbitration. Plaintiff also appeals from the court's order of January 26, 2012, denying reconsideration.

Plaintiff argues that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases