1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BOUCHARD v. CBS CORPORATION
 

BOUCHARD v. CBS CORPORATION

E.D. PA Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-66270-ER, Consolidated Under MDL-875, Case No. 11-00458.

LOLA BOUCHARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CBS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

April 17, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LOLA BOUCHARD, Plaintiff, represented by JANET L. RICE , SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER & WILLLIAM RUTZICK , SACHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER.

MICHAEL BOUCHARD, Plaintiff, represented by JANET L. RICE , SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER & WILLLIAM RUTZICK , SACHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER.

INTERNATIONAL PAPER, Defendant, represented by STEVEN V. RIZZO , RIZZO MATINGLY BOSWORTH PC.

LOCKHEED SHIPBUILDING COMPANY, Defendant, represented by AARON P. RIENSCHE , OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE PLLC & ROBERT GREGORY ANDRE , OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE PLLC.

TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by WALTER EUGENE BARTON , KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL.

CSK AUTO INC, Defendant, represented by STEPHEN G. LEATHAM , HEURLIN POTTER JAHN LEATHAM HOLTMANN.

GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, Defendant, represented by MATTHEW TURETSKY , SCHWABE WILLIAMSON WYATT.

JT THORPE & SON INC, Defendant, represented by KATHERINE M. STEELE , STAFFORD-FREY COOPER & KATHLEEN M. MULLIGAN , SIDLEY & AUSTIN.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, represented by RICHARD G. GAWLOWSKI , WILSON SMITH COCHRAN & DICKERSON.

SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS INC, Defendant, represented by TIMOTHY KOST THORSON , CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN.

SAINT GOBAIN CONTAINERS INC, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO SAINT GOBAIN CONTAINERS INC, Defendant, represented by DIANE J. KERO , GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL.

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by DIANE J. KERO , GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL.

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motion to Expedite Remand and Motion for Remand, wherein Plaintiffs assert first that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter and second that Defendant Lockheed Shipbuilding Corporation's removal under the federal officer removal statute was untimely and improper. For the following reasons, the Court finds that it does have jurisdiction over this matter and that Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases