TIM MENDIOLA et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents,
v.
CPS SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.
FLORIANO ACOSTA et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents,
v.
CPS SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Hina B. Shah for Women's Employment Rights Clinic of Golden Gate University School of Law, Asian Americans Advancing Justice — Asian Law Caucus, Katharine and George Alexander Community Law Center, Legal Aid Society — Employment Law Center, the Maintenance Cooperation Trust Fund, National Lawyers Guild — Labor and Employment Committee, UC Hastings Civil Justice Clinic, UCLA Labor Center and Worksafe Inc., as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents.
Here we hold that, under the California wage order covering security guards, these plaintiffs are entitled to compensation for all on-call hours spent at their assigned worksites under their employer's control.
I. BACKGROUND
The relevant facts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.