10-Q 1 a14-23805_110q.htm 10-Q

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014.

 

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

 

For the transition period from                          to                         .

 

Commission file number: 333-170812

 


 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

26-1747745
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

2270 Colonial Boulevard, Fort Myers, Florida

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

33907

(Zip Code)

 

(239) 931-7275

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. * oYes  xNo

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filero

 

Accelerated filero

 

Non-accelerated filerx

 

Smaller reporting companyo

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes  x No

 


* The registrant has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but is not required to file such reports under such Sections.

 

As of February 1, 2015, we had outstanding 1,028 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, which are 100% owned by 21st Century Oncology Investments, LLC.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

 

Form 10-Q

 

INDEX

 

PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

4

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

5

 

 

 

 

Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

7

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

36

 

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

63

 

 

 

Item 4

Controls and Procedures

63

 

 

 

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

65

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

65

 

 

 

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

71

 

 

 

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

71

 

 

 

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

71

 

 

 

Item 5.

Other Information

71

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

72

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.    Financial Statements

 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents ($6,715 and $4,414 related to VIEs)

 

$

160,721

 

$

17,462

 

Restricted cash

 

7,239

 

3,768

 

Accounts receivable, net ($17,770 and $14,527 related to VIEs)

 

139,316

 

117,044

 

Prepaid expenses ($591 and $628 related to VIEs)

 

8,516

 

7,577

 

Inventories ($396 and $609 related to VIEs)

 

4,596

 

4,393

 

Deferred income taxes ($6 and $6 related to VIEs)

 

108

 

375

 

Other ($689 and $47 related to VIEs)

 

8,337

 

12,534

 

Total current assets

 

328,833

 

163,153

 

Equity investments in joint ventures

 

1,596

 

2,555

 

Property and equipment, net ($19,965 and $17,786 related to VIEs)

 

274,655

 

240,371

 

Real estate subject to finance obligation

 

17,743

 

19,239

 

Goodwill ($47,372 and $23,970 related to VIEs)

 

442,293

 

578,013

 

Intangible assets, net ($11,781 and $3,319 related to VIEs)

 

83,727

 

85,025

 

Other assets ($6,188 and $6,035 related to VIEs)

 

35,468

 

39,835

 

Total assets

 

$

1,184,315

 

$

1,128,191

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable ($3,247 and $1,469 related to VIEs)

 

$

86,133

 

$

57,613

 

Accrued expenses ($3,804 and $4,692 related to VIEs)

 

97,459

 

64,021

 

Income taxes payable ($0 and $90 related to VIEs)

 

730

 

2,372

 

Current portion of long-term debt ($14 and $13 related to VIEs)

 

25,950

 

17,536

 

Current portion of finance obligation

 

361

 

317

 

Other current liabilities

 

12,018

 

12,237

 

Total current liabilities

 

222,651

 

154,096

 

Long-term debt, less current portion ($5,015 and $25 related to VIEs)

 

942,963

 

974,130

 

Finance obligation, less current portion

 

18,468

 

20,333

 

Embedded derivative features of Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

15,006

 

 

Other long-term liabilities ($2,341 and $1,918 related to VIEs)

 

45,505

 

38,453

 

Deferred income taxes

 

4,609

 

4,498

 

Total liabilities

 

1,249,202

 

1,191,510

 

Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock, $0.001 par value, $1,000 stated value, 3,500,000 and -0- authorized, 385,000 and -0- issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively

 

304,271

 

 

Noncontrolling interests - redeemable

 

45,987

 

15,899

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 and 1,028 shares authorized at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, 1,028 issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

649,993

 

650,879

 

Retained deficit

 

(1,043,319

)

(718,237

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

(37,901

)

(26,393

)

Total 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder’s deficit

 

(431,227

)

(93,751

)

Noncontrolling interests - nonredeemable

 

16,082

 

14,533

 

Total deficit

 

(415,145

)

(79,218

)

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

1,184,315

 

$

1,128,191

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands):

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue

 

$

238,403

 

$

178,655

 

$

698,261

 

$

526,475

 

Management fees

 

16,762

 

 

50,215

 

 

Other revenue

 

2,453

 

2,385

 

8,437

 

6,651

 

Total revenues

 

257,618

 

181,040

 

756,913

 

533,126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

134,599

 

98,032

 

396,311

 

293,972

 

Medical supplies

 

24,771

 

15,917

 

71,007

 

46,166

 

Facility rent expenses

 

14,867

 

11,427

 

47,529

 

32,285

 

Other operating expenses

 

15,558

 

11,882

 

46,035

 

33,155

 

General and administrative expenses

 

37,811

 

24,936

 

101,985

 

68,832

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

22,388

 

16,059

 

65,272

 

46,550

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

5,621

 

3,767

 

13,345

 

8,857

 

Interest expense, net

 

30,233

 

21,952

 

87,659

 

62,369

 

Impairment loss

 

47,526

 

 

229,526

 

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

8,558

 

 

8,558

 

 

Equity initial public offering expenses

 

742

 

 

4,905

 

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction

 

 

 

135

 

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

209

 

 

612

 

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture

 

 

 

 

(1,460

)

Loss on foreign currency transactions

 

210

 

364

 

317

 

1,166

 

Loss (gain) on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

67

 

(4

)

309

 

Total expenses

 

343,093

 

204,403

 

1,073,192

 

592,201

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

 

(85,475

)

(23,363

)

(316,279

)

(59,075

)

Income tax expense

 

1,173

 

1,699

 

4,213

 

4,849

 

Net loss

 

(86,648

)

(25,062

)

(320,492

)

(63,924

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests — redeemable and non-redeemable

 

(729

)

(347

)

(4,590

)

(1,365

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

(87,377

)

(25,409

)

(325,082

)

(65,289

)

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation

 

(1,990

)

(4,228

)

(12,596

)

(9,817

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

(1,990

)

(4,228

)

(12,596

)

(9,817

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

 

(88,638

)

(29,290

)

(333,088

)

(73,741

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests-redeemable and non-redeemable:

 

(512

)

(25

)

(3,502

)

(516

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(89,150

)

$

(29,315

)

$

(336,590

)

$

(74,257

)

 

See accompanying notes.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

(in thousands):

 

2014

 

2013

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(320,492

)

$

(63,924

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

54,003

 

40,062

 

Amortization

 

11,269

 

6,488

 

Deferred rent expense

 

477

 

636

 

Deferred income taxes

 

638

 

(1,989

)

Stock-based compensation

 

99

 

481

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

13,345

 

8,857

 

Loss on the sale/disposal of property and equipment

 

256

 

212

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction

 

135

 

 

Impairment loss

 

229,526

 

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

8,558

 

 

Equity initial public offering expenses

 

4,905

 

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture

 

 

(1,460

)

Loss on foreign currency transactions

 

105

 

137

 

(Gain) loss on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

(4

)

309

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

612

 

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

2,035

 

703

 

Amortization of loan costs

 

4,821

 

4,128

 

Equity interest in net loss of joint ventures

 

161

 

425

 

Distribution received from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

168

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable and other current assets

 

(31,317

)

(25,578

)

Income taxes payable

 

(933

)

343

 

Inventories

 

(195

)

(591

)

Prepaid expenses

 

2,747

 

194

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

12,320

 

12,591

 

Accrued deferred compensation

 

1,059

 

1,019

 

Accrued expenses / other current liabilities

 

17,392

 

19,519

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

11,690

 

2,562

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(44,269

)

(25,109

)

Acquisition of medical practices

 

(50,121

)

(24,250

)

Restricted cash associated with medical practice acquisitions

 

(3,471

)

(5,002

)

Proceeds from the sale of equity interest in a joint venture

 

 

1,460

 

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment

 

91

 

64

 

Loans to employees

 

(871

)

(559

)

Contribution of capital to joint venture entities

 

(620

)

(542

)

Purchase of noncontrolling interest - non-redeemable

 

 

(1,509

)

Proceeds (payment) of foreign currency derivative contracts

 

26

 

(171

)

Premiums on life insurance policies

 

(851

)

(901

)

Change in other assets and other liabilities

 

(256

)

(53

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(100,342

)

(56,572

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt (net of original issue discount of $3.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively)

 

164,556

 

207,650

 

Principal repayments of debt

 

(250,208

)

(133,917

)

Repayments of finance obligation

 

(167

)

(142

)

Proceeds from issuance of Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

325,000

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of noncontrolling interest

 

1,250

 

 

Proceeds from noncontrolling interest holders - redeemable and non-redeemable

 

229

 

765

 

Cash distributions to noncontrolling interest holders — redeemable and non-redeemable

 

(2,050

)

(1,896

)

Payments of costs for equity securities offering

 

(4,220

)

 

Payments of loan costs

 

(2,437

)

(1,359

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

231,953

 

71,101

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(42

)

(32

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

143,259

 

17,059

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

17,462

 

15,410

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

160,721

 

$

32,469

 

 

5



Table of Contents

 

continued

 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

(in thousands):

 

2014

 

2013

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions

 

 

 

 

 

Finance obligation related to real estate projects

 

$

2,465

 

$

5,337

 

Derecognition of finance obligation related to real estate projects

 

$

4,119

 

$

 

Capital lease obligations related to the purchase of equipment

 

$

7,069

 

$

79

 

Medical equipment and service contract component related to the acquisition of medical equipment through accounts payable

 

$

12,486

 

$

 

Issuance of notes payable relating to the acquisition of medical practices

 

$

2,000

 

$

2,097

 

Liability relating to the escrow debt and purchase price of medical practices

 

$

2,970

 

$

 

Capital lease obligations related to the acquisition of medical practices

 

$

47,796

 

$

8,748

 

Earn-out accrual related to the acquisition of medical practices

 

$

1,003

 

$

400

 

Amounts payable to sellers in the purchase of a medical practice

 

$

295

 

$

 

Incurred offering costs

 

$

685

 

$

 

Issuance costs related to the Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

$

6,792

 

$

 

Noncash dividend declared to noncontrolling interest

 

$

246

 

$

140

 

Accrued dividends on Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

$

982

 

$

 

Accretion of redemption value on Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

$

87

 

$

 

Noncash deconsolidation of noncontrolling interest

 

$

 

$

9

 

Noncash contribution of capital by noncontrolling interest holders

 

$

 

$

4,235

 

Termination of prepaid services by noncontrolling interest holder

 

$

 

$

2,551

 

Issuance of notes payable relating to the earn-out liability in the acquisition of Medical Developers

 

$

 

$

2,679

 

Issuance of equity LLC units relating to the earn-out liability in the acquisition of Medical Developers

 

$

 

$

705

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

 

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

 

1.          Organization

 

21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Radiation Therapy Services Holdings, Inc.) (“Parent”), through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Subsidiaries” and, collectively with the Subsidiaries, the “Company”) is a leading global, physician-led provider of integrated cancer care (“ICC”) services. The Company’s physicians provide comprehensive, academic quality, cost-effective coordinated care for cancer patients in personal and convenient community settings (its “ICC model”). The Company provides academic center level care to cancer patients in a community setting and employs or affiliates with leading physicians and provides them with the advanced medical technology necessary to achieve optimal clinical outcomes across a full spectrum of oncologic disease in each local market. The Company’s provision of care includes a full spectrum of cancer care services by employing and affiliating with physicians in the related specialties of medical oncology, breast, gynecological and general surgery, urology and primary care. This innovative approach to cancer care through its ICC model enables the Company to collaborate across its physician base, integrate services and payments for related medical needs and disseminate best practices.

 

The Company operates the largest integrated network of cancer treatment centers and affiliated physicians in the world which, as of September 30, 2014, was comprised of approximately 794 community-based physicians in the fields of radiation oncology, medical oncology, breast, gynecological and general surgery, urology and primary care. The Company’s physicians provide medical services at approximately 391 locations, including our 178 radiation therapy centers, of which 48 operate in partnership with health systems. The Company’s cancer treatment centers in the United States are operated predominantly under the 21st Century Oncology brand and are strategically clustered in 31 local markets in 16 states. The Company’s 35 international treatment centers in six Latin American markets are operated under the 21st Century Oncology brand or a local brand and, in many cases, are operated with local minority partners, including hospitals.

 

The Company operates in 16 states, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina and West Virginia, as well as countries in Latin America, Central America and the Caribbean. The international centers are located in Argentina, Mexico, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, and El Salvador.

 

The Company is also engaged in providing capital equipment and business management services to oncology physician groups (“Groups”) that treat patients at cancer centers (“Centers”). The Company owns the Centers’ assets and provides services to the Groups through exclusive, long-term management services agreements. The Company provides the Groups with oncology business management expertise and new technologies including radiation oncology equipment and related treatment software. Business services that the Company provides to the Groups include non-physician clinical and administrative staff, operations management, purchasing, managed care contract negotiation assistance, reimbursement, billing and collecting, information technology, human resource and payroll, compliance, accounting, and treasury. Under the terms of the management service agreements, the Company is reimbursed for certain operating expenses of each Center and earns a monthly management fee from each Group.  The management fee is primarily based on a predetermined percentage of each Group’s earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) associated with the provision of radiation therapy.  The Company manages the radiation oncology business operations of one Group in Florida, six Groups in California, and one Group in Indiana.  The Company’s management fees range from 40% to 60% of EBITDA, with one Group in California whose fee ranges from 20% to 30% of collections.

 

On December 9, 2013, Radiation Therapy Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, changed its name to 21st Century Oncology, Inc. (“21C”)

 

2.  Liquidity

 

The Company is highly leveraged. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had approximately $1.0 billion of long-term debt outstanding.  The Company has experienced and continues to experience losses from its operations. The Company reported a net loss of approximately $78.2 million, $151.1 million and $349.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $320.5 million and $63.9 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

The Company’s high level of debt could have material adverse effects on its business and financial condition. Specifically, the Company’s high level of debt could have important consequences, including the following:

 

·    making it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its obligations with respect to debt;

 

·    limiting the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements;

 

·    requiring a substantial portion of the Company’s cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes;

 

·    increasing the Company’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

 

·    limiting the Company’s flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which the Company competes;

 

·    placing the Company at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors; and

 

·    increasing the Company’s cost of borrowing.

 

The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments and to refinance its indebtedness depends on, and is subject to, its financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors beyond the Company’s control, including the availability of financing in the international banking and capital markets.

 

                                    As discussed in Note 15, the Company is involved in disputes, litigation, and regulatory matters incidental to its operations, including governmental investigations and other matters arising out of the normal conduct of business.  The resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial position.

 

On July 29, 2014, the Company, and each of its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into a Recapitalization Support Agreement (the “Recapitalization Support Agreement”). The Recapitalization Support Agreement set forth the terms through which the Company expected to either (a) obtain additional liquidity through an equity contribution or subordinated debt incurred in a minimum amount of $150 million on or before October 1, 2014 (the “Capital Contribution”) or (b) consummate a recapitalization (the “Recapitalization”) consistent with the material terms and conditions described in the term sheet (the “Recapitalization Term Sheet”) attached to the Recapitalization Support Agreement.

 

On September 26, 2014, the Company issued to Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (“CPPIB”), in a private placement, an aggregate of 385,000 newly issued shares of its Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), for a purchase price of $325.0 million.

 

This equity investment provides the Company with substantial incremental liquidity, significantly reduces its debt, and provides the necessary long-term capital to continue to grow its business.  As further described in Note 14, a portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility, repay all obligations under the South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans, repay certain other debt and capital leases, as well as provide capital for near-term strategic initiatives and general corporate purposes.  As a result of this investment, the Recapitalization Support Agreement that the Company entered into in July was terminated in accordance with its terms, and the Company’s senior subordinated notes will remain outstanding and unmodified.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

3.   Basis of presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements.  All adjustments necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are considered to be of a normal and recurring nature. Interim results for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2014.

 

These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

The Company’s results of operations historically have fluctuated on a quarterly basis and can be expected to continue to fluctuate. Many of the patients of the Company’s Florida treatment centers are part-time residents during the winter months. Hence, these treatment centers have historically experienced higher utilization rates during the winter months than during the remainder of the year. In addition, volume is typically lower in the summer months due to traditional vacation periods.

 

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries and entities controlled by the Company through the Company’s direct or indirect ownership of a majority interest and/or exclusive rights granted to the Company as the management company of such entities or by contract. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

The Company has evaluated certain radiation oncology practices in order to determine if they are variable interest entities (“VIEs”). This evaluation resulted in the Company determining that certain of its radiation oncology practices were potential VIEs. For each of these practices, the Company has evaluated (1) the sufficiency of the fair value of the entity’s equity investments at risk to absorb losses, (2) that, as a group, the holders of the equity investments at risk have (a) the direct or indirect ability through voting rights to make decisions about the entity’s significant activities, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity and that their obligations are not protected directly or indirectly, and (c) the right to receive the expected residual return of the entity, and (3) substantially all of the entity’s activities do not involve or are not conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately fewer voting rights in terms of its obligation to absorb the expected losses or its right to receive expected residual returns of the entity, or both. The Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), requires a company to consolidate VIEs if the company is the primary beneficiary of the activities of those entities. Certain of the Company’s radiation oncology practices are VIEs and the Company has a variable interest in each of these practices through its administrative services agreements. Other of the Company’s radiation oncology practices (primarily consisting of partnerships) are VIEs and the Company has a variable interest in each of these practices because the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the legal entity to finance its activities without the additional subordinated financial support provided by its members.

 

In accordance with ASC 810, the Company consolidates certain radiation oncology practices where the Company provides administrative services pursuant to long-term management agreements. The noncontrolling interests in these entities represent the interests of the physician owners of the oncology practices in the equity and results of operations of these consolidated entities. The Company, through its variable interests in these practices, has the power to direct the activities of these practices that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the Company would absorb a majority of the expected losses of these practices should they occur. Based on these determinations, the Company has consolidated these radiation oncology practices in its condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

 

The Company could be obligated, under the terms of the operating agreements governing certain of its joint ventures, upon the occurrence of various fundamental regulatory changes and or upon the occurrence of certain events outside of the Company’s control to purchase some or all of the noncontrolling interests related to the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries. These repurchase requirements would be triggered by, among other things, regulatory changes prohibiting the existing ownership structure. While the Company is not aware of events that would make the occurrence of such a change probable, regulatory changes are outside the control of the Company. Accordingly, the noncontrolling interests subject to these repurchase provisions have been classified outside of equity on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the combined total assets included in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet relating to the VIEs were approximately $111.5 million and $71.3 million, respectively.

 

As of September 30, 2014, the Company was the primary beneficiary of, and therefore consolidated, 27 VIEs, which operate 46 centers. Any significant amounts of assets and liabilities related to the consolidated VIEs are identified parenthetically on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The assets are owned by, and the liabilities are obligations of the VIEs, not the Company. Only the VIE’s assets can be used to settle the liabilities of the VIE. The assets are used pursuant to operating agreements established by each VIE. The VIEs are not guarantors of the Company’s debts. In the states of California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New York and North Carolina, the Company’s treatment centers are operated as physician office practices. The Company typically provides technical services to these treatment centers in addition to administrative services. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 approximately 15.0% and 18.6% of the Company’s net patient service revenue, respectively, was generated by professional corporations for which it has administrative management agreements.

 

As of September 30, 2014, the Company also held equity interests in six VIEs for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Those VIEs consist of partnerships that primarily provide radiation oncology services.  The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs as it does not retain the power and rights in the operations of the entities. The Company’s investments in the unconsolidated VIEs are approximately $1.6 million and $2.6 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, with ownership interests ranging between 33.3% and 50.1% general partner or equivalent interest. Accordingly, substantially all of these equity investment balances are attributed to the Company’s noncontrolling interests in the unconsolidated partnerships. The Company’s maximum risk of loss related to the investments in these VIEs is limited to the equity interest.

 

The cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 are approximately $185.1 million and $130.3 million, respectively. The cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 are approximately $544.9 million and $381.7

 

8



Table of Contents

 

million, respectively. The cost of revenues includes costs related to expenses incurred for the delivery of patient care.  These costs include salaries and benefits of physician, physicists, dosimetrists radiation technicians etc., medical supplies, facility rent expenses, other operating expenses, depreciation and amortization.

 

Foreign currency translation

 

The Argentine government has implemented certain measures that control and restrict the ability of companies and individuals to exchange Argentine pesos for foreign currencies. Those measures include, among other things, the requirement to obtain the prior approval from the Argentine Tax Authority of the foreign currency transaction (for example and without limitation, for the payment of non-Argentine goods and services, payment of principal and interest on non-Argentine debt and also payment of dividends to parties outside of the country), which approval process could delay, and eventually restrict, the ability to exchange Argentine pesos for other currencies, such as U.S. dollars. Those approvals are administered by the Argentine Central Bank through the Local Exchange Market (“Mercado Unico Libre de Cambios”, or “MULC”), which is the only market where exchange transactions may be lawfully made.

 

During January 2014, the Argentinean peso exchange rate against the U.S. Dollar increased by approximately 23%, from 6.52 Argentinean Pesos per U.S. Dollar as of December 31, 2013 to approximately 8.0 Argentinean Pesos per U.S. Dollar. As of September 30, 2014, the Argentinean Peso exchange rate was 8.48 Argentine Pesos per U.S. Dollar.

 

New Pronouncements

 

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740):Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (ASU 2013-11), which amends ASC 740 to clarify balance sheet presentation requirements of unrecognized tax benefits. ASU 2013-11 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2014. The Company adopted ASC 740 and reclassified approximately $1.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits from income taxes payable to other long term liabilities.

 

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU 2014-08 changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 205-20, such that a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. ASU 2014-08 requires an entity to present, for each comparative period, the assets and liabilities of a disposal group that includes a discontinued operation separately in the asset and liability sections, respectively, of the statement of financial position, as well as additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Additionally, ASU 2014-08 requires disclosures about a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements and expands the disclosures about an entity’s significant continuing involvement with a discontinued operation. The accounting update is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The core principle of the guidance in ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance, which will be effective beginning January 1, 2017.

 

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40).” The new guidance addresses management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued. The standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect to early adopt this guidance and does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

4.  Stock-based compensation

 

2012 Equity-based incentive plans

 

Effective as of June 11, 2012, 21st Century Oncology Investments, LLC, the Company’s direct parent (“21CI”), entered into a Third Amended and Restated LLC Agreement (the “Amended LLC Agreement”). The Amended LLC Agreement established new classes of equity units (such new units, the “2012 Plan”) in 21CI in the form of Class MEP Units, Class EMEP Units, Class L Units and Class G Units for issuance to employees, officers, directors and other service providers, establishes new distribution entitlements related thereto, and modifies the distribution entitlements for holders of Preferred units and Class A Units of 21CI. In addition to the Preferred Units and Class A Units of 21CI, the Amended LLC Agreement authorized for issuance under the 2012 Plan 1,100,200 units of limited liability company interests consisting of 1,000,000 Class MEP Units, 100,000 Class EMEP Units, 100 Class L Units, and 100 Class G Units.

 

Generally, for Class MEP units awarded, 66.6% vest upon issuance, while the remaining 33.4% vest on the 18 month anniversary of the issuance date. There are no performance conditions for the MEP units to vest. For newly hired individuals after January 1, 2012, vesting occurs at 33.3% in years one and two, and 33.4% in year three of the individual’s hire date. In the event of a sale or public offering of the Company prior to termination of employment, all unvested Class MEP units would vest upon consummation of the transaction. The MEP units are eligible to receive distributions only upon a return of all capital invested in 21CI, plus the amounts to which the Class EMEP Units, are entitled to receive under the Amended LLC Agreements; which effectively creates a market condition that is reflected in the value of the Class MEP units.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

Vesting of the Class EMEP units is dependent upon achievement of an implied equity value target. The right to receive proceeds from vested units is dependent upon the occurrence of a qualified sale or liquidation event. Specifically, the percentage of EMEP units that vest is based on the implied value of the Company’s equity, to be measured quarterly beginning December 31, 2012. 25% of the awards will be eligible for vesting if the “implied equity value” exceeds a predetermined threshold, with 50% incremental vesting eligibility if the implied value exceeds several higher thresholds for at least two consecutive quarters. The implied equity value per the Amended LLC Agreement is a multiple of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) as defined in the Amended LLC Agreement. As with the MEP units, the values of the EMEP units are subject to a market condition in the form of the return on investment target for Vestar’s interest. The Class EMEP Units were eliminated under the Fourth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “Fourth Amended LLC Agreement”) in December 2013.

 

For purposes of determining the compensation expense associated with the 2012 equity-based incentive plan grants, management valued the business enterprise using a variety of widely accepted valuation techniques, which considered a number of factors such as the financial performance of the Company, the values of comparable companies and the lack of marketability of the Company’s equity. The Company then used the probability-weighted expected return method (“PWERM”) to determine the fair value of these units at the time of grant. Under the PWERM, the value of the units is estimated based upon an analysis of future values for the enterprise assuming various future outcomes (exits) as well as the rights of each unit class. In developing assumptions for the various exit scenarios, management considered the Company’s ability to achieve certain growth and profitability milestone in order to maximize shareholder value at the time of potential exit. Management considers an initial public offering of the Company’s stock to be one of the exit scenarios for the current shareholders, although sale or merger/acquisition are possible future exit options as well. For the scenarios the enterprise value at exit was estimated based on a multiple of the Company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization EBITDA for the fiscal year preceding the exit date. The enterprise value for the Staying Private Scenario was estimated based on a discounted cash flow analysis as well as guideline company market approach. The guideline companies were publicly-traded companies that were deemed comparable to the Company. The discount rate analysis also leveraged market data of the same guideline companies.

 

For each PWERM scenario, management estimated probability factors based on the outlook of the Company and the industry as well as prospects for potential exit at the exit date based on information known or knowable as of the grant date. The probability-weighted unit values calculated at each potential exit date was present-valued to the grant date to estimate the per-unit value. The discount rate utilized in the present value calculation was the cost of equity calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”) and based on the market data of the guideline companies as well as historical data published by Morningstar, Inc. For each PWERM scenario, the per unit values were adjusted for lack of marketability discount to conclude on unit value on a minority, non-marketable basis.

 

The estimated fair value of the units, less an assumed forfeiture rate of 3.9%, is recognized in expense in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements over the requisite service period and in accordance with the vesting conditions of the awards for Class MEP Units. For Class MEP Units, the requisite service period is approximately 18 months, and for Class EMEP Units, the requisite service period is 36 months only if met or probable of being met. The assumed forfeiture rate is based on an average historical forfeiture rate.

 

Grants under 2013 Plan

 

On December 9, 2013, 21CI entered into the Fourth Amended LLC Agreement which replaced the Amended LLC Agreement in its entirety. The Fourth Amended LLC Agreement established new classes of incentive equity units (such new units, together with Class MEP Units, as modified under the Fourth Amended LLC Agreement, (the “2013 Plan”) in 21CI in the form of Class M Units, Class N Units and Class O Units for issuance to employees, officers, directors and other service providers, eliminated 21CI’s Class L Units and Class EMEP Units, and modified the distribution entitlements for holders of each existing class of equity units of 21CI.

 

The Company recorded approximately $28,000 and $136,000 of stock-based compensation for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $99,000 and $481,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which is included in salaries and benefits in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

The summary of activity under the 2012 and 2013 Plans is presented below:

 

2012 and 2013 Plans

 

Class MEP 
Units 
Outstanding

 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant Date 
Fair Value

 

Class M Units 
Outstanding

 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant Date 
Fair Value

 

Class O Units 
Outstanding

 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant Date 
Fair Value

 

Nonvested balance at end of period December 31, 2013

 

73,624

 

$

2.24

 

100,000

 

$

58.37

 

100,000

 

$

0.47

 

Units granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Units forfeited

 

 

 

(15,000

)

58.37

 

(14,000

)

0.47

 

Units vested

 

(29,698

)

2.68

 

 

 

 

 

Nonvested balance at end of period September 30, 2014

 

43,926

 

$

1.94

 

85,000

 

$

58.37

 

86,000

 

$

0.47

 

 

As of September 30, 2014, there was approximately $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the MEP Units. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.27 years for MEP Units.

 

As of September 30, 2014, there was approximately $3.8 million, and $39,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the M Units, and O Units, respectively. The Class M Units and O Units compensation will be recognized upon the sale of the Company or an initial public offering. Under the terms of the incentive unit grant agreements governing the grants of the Class M Units and Class O Units, in the

 

10



Table of Contents

 

event of an initial public offering of the Company’s common stock, holders have certain rights to receive shares of restricted common stock of the Company in exchange for their Class M Units and Class O Units.

 

Executive Bonus Plan

 

On December 9, 2013, the Company adopted the Executive Bonus Plan to provide certain senior level employees of the Company with an opportunity to receive additional compensation based on the Equity Value, as defined in the plan and described in general terms as noted below, of 21CI. Upon the occurrence of the first company sale or initial public offering to occur following the effective date of the plan, a bonus pool was established equal in value of 5% of the Equity Value of 21CI, subject to a maximum bonus pool of $12.7 million. Each participant in the plan will participate in the bonus pool based on the participant’s award percentage.

 

Payments of awards under the plan generally will be made as follows:

 

If the applicable liquidity event is a company sale, payment of the awards under the plan will be made within 30 days following consummation of the company sale in the same form as the proceeds received by 21CI. If the applicable liquidity event is an initial public offering, one-third of the award will be paid within 45 days following the effective date of the initial public offering, and the remaining two-thirds of the award will be payable in two equal annual installments on each of the first and second anniversaries of the effective date of the initial public offering. Payment of the award may be made in cash or stock or a combination thereof.

 

For purposes of the plan, the term “Equity Value” generally refers to: (i) if the applicable liquidity event is a company sale, the aggregate fair market value of the cash and non-cash proceeds received by 21CI and its equity holders in connection with the sale of equity interests in the Company; or (ii) if the applicable liquidity event is an initial public offering, the aggregate fair market value of 100% of the common stock of the Company on the effective date of its initial public offering.

 

As of September 30, 2014, there was approximately $8.9 million total unrecognized compensation expense related to the Executive Bonus Plan. The Executive Bonus Plan compensation will be recognized upon the sale of the Company or an initial public offering.

 

Grant of Class N Units

 

In December, 2013, 10 class N units were granted to an employee.  50% of the Class N Units vest upon the sale of the Company or an initial public offering. The remaining 50% is amortized over five years subsequent to an initial public offering. As of September 30, 2014, there was approximately $6,000 total unrecognized compensation expense related to the Class N Units.

 

Grant of Class G Units

 

In May, 2014, 10 class G units were granted to an employee.  100% of the Class G Units vest upon the sale of the Company or an initial public offering. As of September 30, 2014, there was approximately $1.5 million total unrecognized compensation expense related to the Class G Units.

 

5.  Comprehensive loss

 

Comprehensive loss consists of two components, net loss and other comprehensive loss. Other comprehensive loss refers to revenue, expenses, gains, and losses that under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States are recorded as an element of equity but are excluded from net loss. The Company’s other comprehensive loss is composed of the Company’s foreign currency translation of its operations in Latin America, Central America and the Caribbean. The impact of the unrealized loss increased accumulated other comprehensive loss on a consolidated basis by approximately $11.5 million and $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were no reclassifications from other comprehensive income into earnings for the periods presented.

 

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

Quarter to date (in thousands):

 

21st Century Oncology 
Holdings, Inc. Shareholder

 

Noncontrolling
Interests

 

Other 
Comprehensive Loss

 

As of June 30, 2014

 

$

(36,128

)

$

(3,511

)

$

(10,606

)

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments

 

(1,773

)

(217

)

(1,990

)

As of September 30, 2014

 

$

(37,901

)

$

(3,728

)

$

(12,596

)

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

Year to date (in thousands):

 

21st Century Oncology 
Holdings, Inc. Shareholder

 

Noncontrolling
Interests

 

Other 
Comprehensive Loss

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

$

(26,393

)

$

(2,640

)

 

 

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments

 

(11,508

)

(1,088

)

$

(12,596

)

As of September 30, 2014

 

$

(37,901

)

$

(3,728

)

$

(12,596

)

 

11



Table of Contents

 

6.   Redeemable preferred stock

 

On September 26, 2014, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) with CPPIB. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement, the Company issued to CPPIB an aggregate of 385,000 newly issued shares of its Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, stated value $1,000 per share, for a purchase price of $325.0 million.

 

As set forth in the Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”), holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, as and if declared by the board of directors of the Company, dividends at an applicable rate per annum, payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year.  During the first three years after issuance, any dividends when and if declared, shall be paid by the Company in the form of additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  During the first twelve months after issuance, the applicable dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Stock shall be 9.875%, thereafter increasing on a periodic basis, as set forth in the Certificate of Designations.  Such dividends accrue daily, whether or not declared by the board of directors of the Company.  After the third anniversary of issuance and only if the Company’s outstanding 97/8% senior subordinated notes due 2017 are repaid in full, or upon certain other events of default, dividends shall be paid in cash upon the election of a majority of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Majority Preferred Holders”).

 

The Series A Preferred Stock is mandatorily convertible into common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of the Company upon the occurrence of a qualifying initial public offering of the Company or a qualifying merger.  In the case of a qualifying initial public offer, the conversion price is the initial public offering price of the qualifying initial public offer.  In the case of a qualifying merger, the conversion price is the price per share of Common Stock pursuant to the qualifying merger. The Series A Preferred Stock also becomes convertible on the tenth anniversary of issuance at the option of either the Company or CPPIB. Absent a qualifying initial public offering or qualifying merger, the conversion price shall be determined upon appraisal. If upon conversion, the Series A Preferred Stock converted to Common Stock represents greater than 29% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock (“Excess Common Stock”), CPPIB has the option to convert amounts in excess of 29% to newly issued preferred stock (the “Excess Preferred Stock”). Holders of the Excess Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends, payable in additional shares of Excess Preferred Stock at 12% per annum. The Excess Preferred Stock becomes mandatorily convertible upon the 15th anniversary of issuance and may be redeemed by the Company at any time at 100% of its stated value. If CPPIB does not elect to receive Excess Preferred Stock, the Company is required to issue a new Class B common stock that will be exchanged for the Excess Common Stock. As long as CPPIB holds the Class B common stock, CPPIB is not entitled to voting rights with respect to the election or removal of directors.

 

Holders of Series A Preferred Stock also have, among other rights, the right to require the Company to repurchase their shares upon the occurrence of certain events of default and certain change of control transactions, at the prices set forth in the Certificate of Designations.  In addition, the Certificate of Designations also provides for certain consent rights of the Majority Preferred Holders in connection with specified corporate events of 21CI or its subsidiaries, including, among other things, with respect to certain equity issuances and certain acquisitions, financing transactions and asset sale transactions.  Upon certain events of default and the obtaining of applicable anti-trust regulatory approvals, holders of Series A Preferred Stock are also entitled to vote together with holders of Common Stock, on an as-converted basis. In addition, the Series A Preferred Stock is senior in preference to the Company’s Common Stock with respect to dividend rights, rights upon liquidation, winding up or dissolution.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement, immediately following the occurrence of a qualifying initial public offering of the Company or a qualifying merger, the Company will execute and deliver to CPPIB a Warrant Agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”) and issue to CPPIB warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock having a then-current value of $30 million, at a purchase price of $0.01 per share.  The warrants expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of issuance. The Company evaluated the contingent events that could trigger the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock to Common Stock and issuance of warrants and determined those contingent conversion features to qualify as an embedded derivative, requiring bifurcation and classification as a liability, measured at fair value. The estimated fair value measurement was developed using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The primary valuation technique used was comparing the difference between the present value of discounted cash flows, assuming no triggering events occur and the present value of discounted cash flows assuming a triggering event does occur. The assumptions incorporated management’s estimates of timing and probability of each triggering event, with those cash flows discounted using rates commensurate with the risks of those cash flows. The Company determined the fair value of the embedded derivative to be, and recorded approximately $15.0 million as of September 30, 2014.

 

The Company is accreting changes to the Series A Preferred Stock redemption value through the tenth anniversary of issuance utilizing the interest method. If the Series A Preferred Stock were redeemable as of the balance sheet date, the Series A Preferred Stock would be redeemable at its stated value plus accrued dividends.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

Changes to the Series A Preferred Stock are as follows:

 

Quarter to date (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2014

 

$

 

Issuance of Series A preferred stock, net of discount and issuance costs

 

318,208

 

Embedded derivative

 

(15,006

)

Accretion of Series A preferred stock to redemption value

 

87

 

Accrued Series A preferred stock dividends

 

982

 

As of September 30, 2014

 

$

304,271

 

 

Year to date (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

$

 

Issuance of Series A preferred stock, net of discount and issuance costs

 

318,208

 

Embedded derivative

 

(15,006

)

Accretion of Series A preferred stock to redemption value

 

87

 

Accrued Series A preferred stock dividends

 

982

 

As of September 30, 2014

 

$

304,271

 

 

7. Reconciliation of total equity

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries in which it has a controlling financial interest.  Noncontrolling interests-nonredeemable principally represent minority shareholders’ proportionate share of the equity of certain consolidated majority owned entities of the Company. The Company has certain arrangements whereby the noncontrolling interest may be redeemed upon the occurrence of certain events outside of the Company’s control. These noncontrolling interests have been classified outside of permanent equity on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The noncontrolling interests are not redeemable at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the contingent events upon which the noncontrolling interest may be redeemed are not probable of occurring at September 30, 2014. Accordingly, the noncontrolling interests are measured at their carrying value at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

The following table presents changes in total equity for the respective periods:

 

13



Table of Contents

 

(in thousands):

 

21st Century 
Oncology 
Holdings, Inc. 
Shareholder’s 
Equity

 

Noncontrolling 
interests -
 nonredeemable

 

Total Equity

 

Noncontrolling 
interests -
 redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

(93,751

)

$

14,533

 

$

(79,218

)

$

15,899

 

Net (loss) income

 

(325,082

)

1,658

 

(323,424

)

2,932

 

Other comprehensive loss from foreign currency translation

 

(11,508

)

(1,079

)

(12,587

)

(9

)

Accretion of Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock to redemption value

 

(87

)

 

(87

)

 

Accrued Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock dividends

 

(982

)

 

(982

)

 

Purchase price fair value of noncontrolling interest - nonredeemable

 

 

616

 

616

 

 

Purchase price fair value of noncontrolling interest - redeemable

 

 

 

 

28,420

 

Proceeds from issuance of noncontrolling interest - nonredeemable

 

84

 

1,166

 

1,250

 

 

Proceeds from noncontrolling interest holders - nonredeemable

 

 

229

 

229

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

99

 

 

99

 

 

Distributions

 

 

(1,041

)

(1,041

)

(1,255

)

Balance, September 30, 2014

 

$

(431,227

)

$

16,082

 

$

(415,145

)

$

45,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

2,420

 

$

16,047

 

$

18,467

 

$

11,368

 

Net (loss) income

 

(65,289

)

1,681

 

(63,608

)

(316

)

Other comprehensive loss from foreign currency translation

 

(8,968

)

(827

)

(9,795

)

(22

)

Proceeds from noncontrolling interest holders

 

 

 

 

765

 

Deconsolidation of noncontrolling interest

 

(9

)

9

 

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

481

 

 

481

 

 

Noncash contribution of capital by noncontrolling interest holders

 

 

 

 

4,235

 

Issuance of equity LLC units relating to earn-out liability

 

705

 

 

705

 

 

Purchase on noncontrolling interest - non-redeemable

 

(2,404

)

895

 

(1,509

)

 

Termination of prepaid services by noncontrolling interest holder

 

 

(2,551

)

(2,551

)

 

Distributions

 

 

(1,939

)

(1,939

)

(97

)

Balance, September 30, 2013

 

$

(73,064

)

$

13,315

 

$

(59,749

)

$

15,933

 

 

Redeemable equity securities with redemption features that are not solely within the Company’s control are classified outside of permanent equity. Those securities are initially recorded at their estimated fair value on the date of issuance. Securities that are currently redeemable or redeemable after the passage of time are adjusted to their redemption value as changes occur. In the unlikely event that a redeemable equity security will require redemption, any subsequent adjustments to the initially recorded amount will be recognized in the period that a redemption becomes probable. Contingent redemption events vary by joint venture and generally include either the holder’s discretion or circumstances jeopardizing: the joint ventures’ ability to provide services, the joint ventures’ participation in Medicare, Medicaid, or other third party reimbursement programs, the tax-exempt status of minority shareholders, and violation of federal statutes, regulations, ordinances, or guidelines. Amounts required to redeem noncontrolling interests are based on either fair value or a multiple of trailing financial performance. These amounts are not limited.

 

8. Derivative Agreements

 

The Company recognizes all derivatives in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship based on its effectiveness in hedging against the exposure. Derivatives that do not meet hedge accounting requirements must be adjusted to fair value through operating results. If the derivative meets hedge accounting requirements, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through operating results or recognized in other comprehensive loss until the hedged item is recognized in operating results. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

 

Foreign currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could impact the Company’s results from operations.  The Company is exposed to a significant amount of foreign exchange risk, primarily between the U.S. dollar and the Argentine Peso.  This exposure relates to the provision of radiation oncology services to patients at the Company’s Latin American operations and purchases of goods and services in foreign currencies. The Company enters into foreign exchange option contracts to convert a significant portion of the Company’s forecasted foreign currency denominated net income into U.S. dollars to limit the adverse impact of a potential weakening Argentine Peso against the U.S. dollar. Because the Company’s Argentine forecasted foreign currency denominated net income is expected to increase commensurate with inflationary expectations, any adverse impact on net income from a weakening Argentine Peso against the U.S. dollar is limited to the cost of the option contracts. Under the Company’s foreign currency management program, the Company expects to monitor foreign exchange rates and periodically enter into forward contracts and other derivative instruments. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

These programs reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of currency exchange movements.  The Company’s current practice is to use currency derivatives without hedge accounting designation. The maturity of these instruments generally occurs within twelve months. Gains or losses resulting from the fair valuing of these instruments are reported in loss (gain) on foreign currency derivative contracts on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized a gain of approximately $4,000 and a loss of approximately $0.3 million, respectively relating to the change in fair market value of its foreign currency derivatives.  The fair value of the foreign currency derivative is recorded in other current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.  At December 31, 2013, the fair value of the foreign currency derivative was approximately $22,000. No foreign currency derivative contract was outstanding at September 30, 2014.

 

Series A Preferred Stock embedded derivative

 

The Company’s Series A Preferred Stock contains provisions for contingent events that could trigger the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock to Common Stock and issuance of warrants to CPPIB. The Company determined those contingent conversion features to qualify as an embedded derivative, requiring bifurcation and classification as a liability, measured at fair value. The Company evaluates the fair value of those embedded derivatives and adjusts changes in fair value through operating results.

 

9. Fair value of financial instruments

 

ASC 820 requires disclosure about how fair value is determined for assets and liabilities and establishes a hierarchy for which these assets and liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of inputs. The three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies, is as follows:

 

Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

 

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

 

In accordance with ASC 820, the fair value of the Term Loan portion of the senior secured credit facility (“Term Facility”), the 97/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017, 87/8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2017, and the 113/4% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 was based on prices quoted from third-party financial institutions (Level 2). At September 30, 2014, the fair values are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$90.0 million senior secured credit facility - (Term Facility)

 

$

88,650

 

$

88,526

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$380.1 million Senior Subordinated Notes due April 15, 2017

 

$

368,649

 

$

378,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$350.0 million Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due January 15, 2017

 

$

357,875

 

$

349,188

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$75.0 million Senior Secured Notes due January 15, 2017

 

$

75,000

 

$

75,000

 

 

At December 31, 2013, the fair values are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$90.0 million senior secured credit facility - (Term Facility)

 

$

88,650

 

$

87,989

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$380.1 million Senior Subordinated Notes due April 15, 2017

 

$

328,743

 

$

377,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$350.0 million Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due January 15, 2017

 

$

355,250

 

$

348,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$75.0 million Senior Secured Notes due January 15, 2017

 

$

78,750

 

$

75,000

 

 

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company held certain items that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis including foreign currency derivative contracts. Cash and cash equivalents are reflected in the financial statements at their carrying value, which approximate their fair value due to their short maturity.  The carrying values of the Company’s long-term debt other than the Term Loan portion of the senior secured credit facility, Senior Subordinated Notes, Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and Senior Secured Notes approximates fair value due to the length of time to maturity and/or the existence of interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates.  There have been no transfers between levels of valuation hierarchies for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

The following items are measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820, as of December 31, 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

(in thousands):

 

December 31, 2013

 

Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical 
Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant Other 
Observable Inputs (Level 
2)

 

Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency derivative contracts

 

$

22

 

$

 

$

22

 

$

 

 

No foreign currency derivative contract was outstanding at September 30, 2014.

 

The estimated fair value of the Company’s foreign currency derivative agreements considered various inputs and assumptions, including the applicable spot rate, forward rates, maturity, implied volatility and other relevant economic measures, all of which are observable market inputs that are classified under Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  The valuation technique used is an income approach with the best market estimate of what will be realized on a discounted cash flow basis.

 

10.  Income tax accounting

 

The Company provides for federal, state and non-US income taxes currently payable, as well as for those deferred due to timing differences between reporting income and expenses for financial statement purposes versus tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted income tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in income tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

ASC 740, Income Taxes, clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a threshold for the recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under ASC 740 the impact of an uncertain tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, ASC 740 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

 

The Company is subject to taxation in the United States, approximately 25 state jurisdictions, the Netherlands, and throughout Latin America, namely, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala and Mexico. However, the principal jurisdictions for which the Company is subject to tax are the United States, Florida and Argentina.

 

The Company’s effective rate was (1.3)% and (8.2)% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The change in the effective rate for the third quarter of 2014 compared to the same period of the year prior is primarily the result of the recording of an impairment against goodwill of the domestic operations during the second and third quarters of 2014, the release of previously recorded reserves related to US federal and state tax issues, the relative mix of earnings and tax rates across jurisdictions, and the application of ASC 740-270 to exclude certain jurisdictions for which the Company is unable to benefit from losses. These items also caused the effective tax rate to differ from the U.S. statutory rate of 35%.  The Company’s tax expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 is primarily due to the non-US tax expense associated with foreign subsidiaries.

 

The Company’s future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof.  The Company monitors the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and makes adjustments, if required, throughout the year.  If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating the Company’s annual effective tax rates, future income tax expense (benefit) could be materially affected.

 

The Company has not provided U.S. federal and state deferred taxes on the cumulative earnings of non-U.S. affiliates and associated companies that have been reinvested indefinitely. The aggregate undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries for which no deferred tax liability has been recorded is approximately $8.6 million as of December 31, 2013 (including positive accumulated earnings of approximately $19 million in foreign jurisdictions that impose withholding taxes of up to 10%). It is not practicable to determine the U.S. income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were not reinvested indefinitely.

 

The Company is routinely under audit by federal, state, or local authorities in the areas of income taxes and other taxes. These audits may include questioning the timing and amount of deductions and compliance with federal, state, and local tax laws. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of adverse outcomes from these audits to determine the adequacy of the Company’s provision for income taxes.  To the extent the Company prevails in matters for which accruals have been established or is required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, the effective tax rate could be materially affected.  In accordance with the statute of limitations for federal tax returns, the Company’s federal tax returns for the years 2011 through 2013 are subject to examination. During the second and third quarters of 2014, the Company reached a favorable settlement

 

16



Table of Contents

 

with the US Internal Revenue Service related to tax years 2007 and 2008 and various state and local jurisdictions related to tax years 2005 through 2012.  As a result, the Company released approximately $2.1 million of previously recorded reserves. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company closed the federal income tax audit related to calendar year 2009 with no material adjustments. The Company closed the New York State audit for tax years 2006 through 2008 with a favorable result during the first quarter of 2013.

 

11.  Acquisitions and other arrangements

 

On February 6, 2012, the Company acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice and a medical oncology group located in Asheville, North Carolina for approximately $0.9 million.  The acquisition of the radiation oncology practice and the medical oncology group, further expands the Company’s presence in the Western North Carolina market and builds on the Company’s ICC model. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $0.8 million, and goodwill of $0.1 million, which is all deductible for tax purposes.

 

In September 2011, the Company entered into a professional services agreement with the North Broward Hospital District in Broward County, Florida to provide professional services at the two radiation oncology departments at Broward General Medical Center and North Broward Medical Center.  In March 2012, the Company amended the license agreement to license the space and equipment and assume responsibility for the operation of those radiation therapy departments, as part of the Company’s value added services offering.  The license agreement runs for an initial term of ten years, with three separate five year renewal options.  The Company recorded approximately $4.3 million of tangible assets relating to the use of medical equipment pursuant to the license agreement.

 

On March 30, 2012, the Company acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice for $26.0 million and two urology groups located in Sarasota/Manatee counties in Southwest Florida for approximately $1.6 million, for a total purchase price of approximately $27.6 million, comprised of $21.9 million in cash and assumed capital lease obligation of approximately $5.7 million. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $7.8 million, intangible assets including non-compete agreements of $6.1 million amortized over 5 years, goodwill of $13.7 million, which is all deductible for tax purposes, and assumed capital lease obligations of approximately $5.7 million.

 

On December 28, 2012, the Company purchased the remaining 50% interest it did not already own in an unconsolidated joint venture which operates a freestanding radiation treatment center in West Palm Beach, Florida for approximately $1.1 million. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $0.3 million, intangible assets including non-compete agreements of $0.2 million amortized over 2 years, goodwill of $0.8 million and current liabilities of approximately $0.2 million.

 

During 2012, the Company acquired the assets of several physician practices in Arizona, California and Florida for approximately $1.7 million. The physician practices provide synergistic clinical services and an ICC service to its patients in the respective markets in which the Company provides radiation therapy treatment services.  The allocation of the purchase price to tangible assets is $1.7 million.

 

On May 25, 2013, the Company acquired the assets of five radiation oncology practices and a urology group located in Lee/Collier counties in Southwest Florida for approximately $28.5 million, comprised of $17.7 million in cash, seller financing note of approximately $2.1 million and assumed capital lease obligations of approximately $8.7 million. The acquisition of the five radiation treatment centers and the urology group further expands the Company’s presence into the Southwest Florida market and builds on its ICC model. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $10.4 million, intangible assets including non-compete agreements of $1.9 million amortized over five years, current liabilities of $0.2 million, and goodwill of $16.4 million, which is all deductible for tax purposes. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company finalized its valuation of assets acquired, primarily working capital. The final valuation resulted in an increase to goodwill of $0.1 million and an increase in current liabilities of $0.1 million. Pro forma results and other expanded disclosures prescribed by ASC 805, Business Combinations, have not been presented as this acquisition is not deemed material.

 

In June 2013, the Company sold its 45% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture which operated a radiation treatment center in Providence, Rhode Island in partnership with a hospital to provide stereotactic radio-surgery through the use of a cyberknife for approximately $1.5 million.

 

In June 2013, the Company contributed its Casa Grande, Arizona radiation physician practice, ICC practice and approximately $5.2 million to purchase a 55.0% interest in a joint venture which included an additional radiation physician practice and an expansion of an ICC model that includes medical oncology, urology and dermatology. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $2.2 million, intangible assets including a tradename of approximately $1.8 million, non-compete agreements of $0.4 million amortized over 7 years, goodwill of $5.1 million, current liabilities of $0.1 million and noncontrolling interest-redeemable of approximately $4.2 million. For purposes of valuing the noncontrolling interest-redeemable, the Company considered a number of factors such as the joint venture’s performance projections, cost of capital, and consideration ascribed to applicable discounts for lack of control and marketability. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company finalized its valuation of assets acquired, primarily working capital. The final valuation resulted in an increase to goodwill of $0.1 million and an increase in current liabilities of $0.1 million.

 

In July 2013, the Company purchased a legal entity, which operates a radiation treatment center in Tijuana Mexico for approximately $1.6 million. The acquisition of this operating treatment center expands the Company’s presence in the international markets.

 

In July 2013, the Company purchased the remaining 38.0% interest in a joint venture radiation facility, located in Woonsocket, Rhode Island from a hospital partner for approximately $1.5 million.

 

In June 2013, the Company entered into a “stalking horse” investment agreement to acquire OnCure Holdings, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “OnCure”) upon effectiveness of its plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code for approximately $125.0 million, (excluding capital leases, working capital and other adjustments). The purchase price included $42.5 million in cash and up to $82.5 million in assumed debt ($7.5 million of assumed debt will be released assuming certain OnCure centers achieve a minimum level of EBITDA).  The Company funded an initial deposit of approximately $5.0 million into an escrow account subject to the working capital adjustments. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company received approximately $3.3 million of the escrow account pursuant to a negotiated working capital settlement.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

On October 25, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of OnCure. The transaction was funded through a combination of cash on hand, borrowings from the Company’s senior secured credit facility and the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes of OnCure, which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and mature January 15, 2017, of which $7.5 million included in other long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, is subject to escrow arrangements and will be released to holders upon satisfaction of certain conditions.

 

OnCure operates radiation oncology treatment centers for cancer patients. It contracts with radiation oncology physician groups and their radiation oncologists through long-term management services agreements to offer cancer patients a comprehensive range of radiation oncology treatment options, including most traditional and next generation services. OnCure provides services to a network of 11 physician groups that treat cancer patients at its 33 radiation oncology treatment centers, making it one of the largest strategically located networks of radiation oncology service providers. OnCure has treatment centers located in California, Florida and Indiana, where it provides the physician groups with the use of the facilities and with certain clinical services of treatment center staff, and administers the non-medical business functions of the treatment centers, such as technical staff recruiting, marketing, managed care contracting, receivables management and compliance, purchasing, information systems, accounting, human resource management and physician succession planning.

 

The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):

 

Preliminary Estimated Acquisition Consideration

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

42,250

 

11.75% senior secured notes due January 2017

 

75,000

 

Assumed capital lease obligations & other notes

 

2,090

 

Fair value of contingent earn-out, represented by 11.75% senior secured notes due January 2017 issued into escrow

 

7,550

 

Total preliminary estimated acquisition consideration

 

$

126,890

 

 

The following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase price of OnCure, including assumed liabilities (in thousands):

 

Preliminary Estimated Acquisition Consideration Allocation

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

307

 

Accounts receivable

 

11,011

 

Inventories

 

199

 

Deferred income taxes—asset

 

4,875

 

Other currents assets

 

1,798

 

Accounts payable

 

(4,674

)

Accrued expenses

 

(3,540

)

Other current liabilities

 

 

Equity investments in joint ventures

 

1,625

 

Property and equipment

 

22,397

 

Intangible assets—management services agreements

 

57,739

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

265

 

Other long—term liabilities

 

(5,828

)

Deferred income taxes—liability

 

(31,669

)

Noncontrolling interest—nonredeemable

 

(1,299

)

Goodwill

 

73,684

 

Preliminary estimated acquisition consideration

 

$

126,890

 

 

Net identifiable assets include the following intangible assets (in thousands):

 

Management service agreements

 

$

57,739

 

 

The Company valued the management services agreements based on the income approach utilizing the excess earnings method. The Company considered a number of factors to value the management services agreements, including OnCure’s performance projections, discount rates, strength of competition, and income tax rates. The management services agreements will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective agreements.

 

The weighted-average amortization period for the acquired amortizable intangible assets at the time of the acquisition was approximately 11.6 years. Total amortization expense recognized for these acquired amortizable intangible assets totaled approximately $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Estimated future amortization expense for OnCure’s acquired amortizable intangible assets as of December 31, 2013 is as follows (in thousands):

 

2014

 

$

5,563

 

2015

 

$

5,563

 

2016

 

$

5,464

 

2017

 

$

5,464

 

2018

 

$

5,195

 

Thereafter

 

$

29,564

 

 

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill of $73.7 million, representing primarily the value of estimated cost savings and synergies expected from the transaction. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and is included in the Company’s U.S. domestic segment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company updated its valuation of assets acquired. The updated valuation, combined with the receipt of escrow funds resulted in a decrease in accounts receivable of approximately $1.5 million, increase in property and equipment of $0.3 million, decrease in goodwill of $2.0 million, and an increase in current liabilities of $0.1 million.

 

On October 30, 2013, the Company acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice located in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina for approximately $2.2 million.  The acquisition of the radiation oncology practice further expands the Company’s presence in the Eastern North Carolina market. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $0.3 million, a certificate of need of approximately $0.3 million, and goodwill of $1.6 million.

 

During 2013, the Company acquired the assets of several physician practices in Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, New Jersey, and Rhode Island for approximately $0.8 million. The physician practices provide synergistic clinical services and an ICC service to its patients in the respective markets in which the Company provides radiation therapy treatment services.  The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $0.8 million.

 

On January 13, 2014, CarePoint purchased the membership interest in Quantum Care, LLC for approximately $1.9 million. CarePoint offers a comprehensive suite of cancer management solutions to insurers, providers, employers and other entities that are financially responsible for the health of defined populations. With proven capabilities to manage medical, radiation and surgical oncology care across the entire continuum of settings, CarePoint represents a unique offering in the health services marketplace. Advanced technology and third-party administrator services, cost management solutions and a focused oncology-specific clinical model enable CarePoint to improve quality and reduce total oncology cost of care for its clients. CarePoint tailors its solutions to the needs of each customer and provides assistance through full-risk transfer, “a la carte” administrative services only packages or hybrid models. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $1.0 million, intangible assets of approximately $0.1 million, goodwill of $1.0 million and current liabilities of $0.2 million.

 

On January 15, 2014, the Company purchased a 69% interest in a legal entity that operates a radiation oncology facility in Guatemala City, Guatemala for approximately $0.9 million plus the assumption of approximately $3.1 million in debt.  This facility is strategically located in Guatemala City’s medical corridor. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $2.7 million, intangible assets of approximately $0.6 million ($0.2 million in hospital contracts, $0.3 million in tradename and $0.1 million in non-compete), goodwill of $1.4 million, noncontrolling interest-non redeemable of approximately $0.5 million and deferred tax liabilities of approximately $0.2 million.

 

On February 10, 2014, the Company purchased a 65% equity interest in South Florida Radiation Oncology (“SFRO”) for approximately $55.4 million, subject to working capital and other customary adjustments. The transaction was primarily funded with the proceeds of a new $60 million term loan facility that accrues interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin of 10.50% per annum and matures on January 15, 2017 and $7.9 million of term loans to refinance existing SFRO debt.

 

The Company accounted for the acquisition of SFRO under ASC 805, Business Combinations. SFRO’s results of operations are included in the condensed consolidated financial statements for periods ending after February 10, 2014, the acquisition date. Given the date of the acquisition, the Company has not completed the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed which is in process.

 

The allocation of the preliminary purchase price was as follows (in thousands):

 

Preliminary Estimated Acquisition Consideration

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

432

 

Term B Loan (net of original issue discount)

 

57,300

 

Seller financing note

 

2,000

 

Working capital settlement

 

(5,333

)

Fair value of contingent earn-out

 

1,003

 

Total preliminary estimated acquisition consideration

 

$

55,402

 

 

19



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase price of SFRO, including assumed liabilities (in thousands):

 

Preliminary Estimated Acquisition Consideration Allocation

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

12,287

 

Other currents assets

 

1,370

 

Current liabilities

 

(15,567

)

Property and equipment

 

19,748

 

Intangible assets—(non-compete and tradename)

 

11,000

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

530

 

Long-term debt

 

(42,021

)

Noncontrolling interest—redeemable

 

(28,420

)

Goodwill

 

96,475

 

Preliminary estimated acquisition consideration

 

$

55,402

 

 

Net identifiable assets include the following intangible assets (in thousands):

 

Trade name (1 year life)

 

$

2,000

 

Non-compete agreement (5 year life)

 

9,000

 

 

 

$

11,000

 

 

The Company preliminarily valued the noncontrolling interest-redeemable considering a number of factors such as SFRO’s performance projections, cost of capital, and consideration ascribed to applicable discounts for lack of control and marketability.

 

The Company valued the trade name using the relief from royalty method, a derivation of the income approach that estimates the benefit of owning the trade name rather than paying royalties for the right to use a comparable asset. The Company considered a number of factors to value the trade name, including SFRO’s performance projections, royalty rates, discount rates, strength of competition, and income tax rates.

 

The Company valued the non-compete agreement using the discounted cash flow method, a derivation of the income approach that evaluates the difference in the sum of SFRO’s present value of cash flows of two scenarios: (1) with the non-compete in place and (2) without the non-compete in place. The Company considered various factors in determining the non-compete value including SFRO’s performance projections, probability of competition, income tax rates, and discount rates.

 

The weighted-average amortization period for the acquired amortizable intangible assets at the time of the acquisition was approximately 4.8 years. Total amortization expense recognized for these acquired amortizable intangible assets totaled approximately $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

 

Estimated future amortization expense for SFRO’s acquired amortizable intangible assets as of the acquisition date is as follows (in thousands):

 

2014

 

$

3,483

 

2015

 

$

1,967

 

2016

 

$

1,800

 

2017

 

$

1,800

 

2018

 

$

1,800

 

Thereafter

 

$

150

 

 

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill of $96.5 million, representing primarily the value of estimated cost savings and synergies expected from the transaction. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and is included in the Company’s U.S. domestic segment.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, the Company recorded $36.8 million and $97.6 million of net patient service revenue and reported a net income of $0.1 million and $1.0 million in connection with the SFRO acquisition.

 

The following unaudited pro forma financial information is presented as if the purchase of OnCure and SFRO had occurred at the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting periods presented below. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what the Company’s results of operations actually would have been had the Company completed the acquisition at the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma financial information does not purport to project the future operating results of the combined company:

 

20



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Three Months 
Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

(in thousands):

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Pro forma total revenues

 

$

226,541

 

$

767,932

 

$

670,849

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma net loss attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(31,279

)

$

(325,808

)

$

(85,980

)

 

On March 26, 2014 the Company purchased a 75% interest in a legal entity that operates a radiation oncology facility in Villa Maria, Argentina for approximately $0.5 million. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $0.4 million, intangible assets of $0.2 million, goodwill of $0.6 million, noncontrolling interest-non redeemable of approximately $0.2 million and total liabilities of approximately $0.5 million.

 

On April 21, 2014, the Company acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice located in Boca Raton, Florida for approximately $0.4 million plus the assumption of approximately $2.7 million in debt.  The acquisition of the radiation oncology practice further expands the Company’s presence in the Broward County market. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $3.0 million and non-compete of $0.1 million.

 

On May 5, 2014, the Company purchased the remaining 50% interest it did not already own in an unconsolidated joint venture which operates a freestanding radiation treatment center in Lauderdale Lakes, Florida for approximately $0.5 million. The allocation of the purchase price is to tangible assets of $0.3 million, accounts receivable of $0.4 million, goodwill of $0.2 million and previously held equity interest of approximately $0.4 million.

 

During 2014, the Company acquired the assets of several physician practices in Florida for approximately $0.3 million. The physician practices provide synergistic clinical services and an ICC service to its patients in the respective markets in which the Company provides radiation therapy treatment services.  The allocation of the purchase price to tangible assets is $0.3 million.

 

The operations of the foregoing acquisitions have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss from the respective date of the acquisition.

 

On January 2, 2015, the Company purchased a 80% interest in a legal entity that that operates a radiation oncology facility in Kennewick, Washington for approximately $17.6 million. The acquisition expands the Company’s presence into the state of Washington. The purchase agreement contains a provision for earn out payments, contingent upon achieving certain EBITDA targets measured over three years from the acquisition date. The earn out payments cannot exceed approximately $3.4 million.

 

On January 6, 2015, the Company acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice located in Warwick, Rhode Island for approximately $8.0 million. The acquisition further expands the Company’s presence in Rhode Island.

 

On January 6, 2015, the Company acquired the additional assets of a radiation oncology practice it already manages located in Hollywood, Florida for approximately $0.5 million.

 

12. Goodwill

 

As the Company began to experience some liquidity issues after terminating its previously planned initial public offering, it began to have discussions with an ad hoc group of holders of our outstanding notes. On July 29, 2014, the Company entered into a Recapitalization Support Agreement. The Recapitalization Support Agreement set forth the terms through which the Company expected to either (a) obtain additional liquidity through an equity contribution or subordinated debt incurred in a minimum amount of $150 million on or before October 1, 2014 or (b) consummate a Recapitalization consistent with the material terms and conditions described in the Recapitalization Term Sheet attached to the Recapitalization Support Agreement.

 

The Company performed an interim impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company completed the first step of the impairment test as of June 30, 2014 and determined that the carrying amount of one of the reporting units exceeded its estimated implied fair value, thereby requiring performance of the second step of the impairment test to calculate the amount of the impairment. In accordance with ASC 350, the Company recorded a preliminary estimated non-cash impairment loss of approximately $182 million in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. The Company completed the second step of the impairment test and recorded an impairment loss of approximately $46.3 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2014. The estimated fair value measurements were developed using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).  For goodwill, the primary valuation technique used was an income methodology based on management’s estimates of forecasted cash flows for each reporting unit, with those cash flows discounted to present value using rates commensurate with the risks of those cash flows.  In addition, management used a market-based valuation method involving analysis of market multiples of revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization EBITDA for (i) a group of comparable public companies and (ii) recent transactions, if any, involving comparable companies.  For trade name intangible assets, management used the income-based relief-from-royalty valuation method in which fair value is the discounted value of forecasted royalty revenues arising from a trade name using a royalty rate that an independent party would pay for use of that trade name.  Assumptions used by management were similar to those that management believes would be used by market participants performing valuations of these regions. Management’s assumptions were based on analysis of current and expected future economic conditions and the strategic plan for each reporting unit.

 

In addition to the goodwill impairment losses noted above, the Company recorded an impairment loss of approximately $1.2 million during the third quarter of 2014 related to the Company’s write-off of its 33.6% investment interest in a development stage proton therapy center located in New York (“NY Proton”). As a result of NY Proton’s continued operating losses since its inception in 2010 and the Company’s liquidity issues experienced during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company provided notice to the consortium that it may not be able to provide the full commitment of approximately $10.0 million to this project. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement entered into with CPPIB on September 26, 2014, the Company is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to transfer and sell its ownership interest to the consortium or to a third party and transfer the general manager role and any future management services fees to the consortium or a third party.

 

21



Table of Contents

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:

 

(in thousands):

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014

 

Year Ended 
December 31, 2013

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

1,050,533

 

$

958,379

 

Accumulated impairment loss *

 

(472,520

)

(472,520

)

Net goodwill, beginning of period

 

578,013

 

485,859

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill acquired during the period

 

99,713

 

99,734

 

Impairment

 

(228,279

)

 

Adjustments to purchase price allocations

 

(1,658

)

(13

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(5,496

)

(7,567

)

Balance, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

1,143,092

 

1,050,533

 

Accumulated impairment loss *

 

(700,799

)

(472,520

)

Net goodwill, end of period

 

$

442,293

 

$

578,013

 

 


* Accumulated impairment losses incurred relate to the U.S. Domestic reporting segment.

 

13. Accrued Expenses

 

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

 

(in thousands):

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 
2013

 

Accrued payroll and payroll related deductions and taxes

 

$

24,562

 

$

23,396

 

Accrued compensation arrangements

 

19,206

 

15,316

 

Accrued interest

 

31,150

 

13,426

 

Accrued other

 

22,541

 

11,883

 

Total accrued expenses

 

$

97,459

 

$

64,021

 

 

22



Table of Contents

 

14. Long-term debt

 

The Company’s long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

$90.0 million senior secured credit facility — (Term Facility) with interest rates at LIBOR (with a minimum rate of 1.0%) or prime (with a minimum rate of 2.0%) plus applicable margin (6.5% for LIBOR Loans and 5.50% for Base Rate Loans) , secured on a first priority basis by a perfected security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. Interest rates are at LIBOR plus applicable margin due at various maturity dates through October 15, 2016

 

$

88,526

 

$

87,989

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$100.0 million senior secured credit facility — (Revolver Credit Facility) with interest rates at LIBOR or prime plus applicable margin, secured on a first priority basis by a perfected security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. Interest rates are at LIBOR plus applicable margin due at various maturity dates through October 15, 2016

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$380.1 million Senior Subordinated Notes due April 15, 2017; semi-annual cash interest payments due on April 15 and October 15, fixed interest rate of 97/8%

 

378,224

 

377,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$350.0 million Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due January 15, 2017; semi-annual cash interest payments due on May 15 and November 15, fixed interest rate of 87/8%

 

349,188

 

348,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$75.0 million Senior Secured Notes due January 15, 2017; semi-annual cash interest payments due on January 15 and July 15, fixed interest rate of 11¾%

 

75,000

 

75,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital leases payable with various monthly payments plus interest at rates ranging from 1.0% to 19.1%, due at various maturity dates through March 2022

 

68,350

 

45,455

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Various other notes payable and seller financing promissory notes with various monthly payments plus interest at rates ranging from 15.4% to 19.5%, due at various maturity dates through April 2021

 

9,625

 

6,629

 

 

 

968,913

 

991,666

 

Less current portion

 

(25,950

)

(17,536

)

 

 

$

942,963

 

$

974,130

 

 

Senior Subordinated Notes

 

On April 20, 2010, the Company issued $310.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 97/8% senior subordinated notes due 2017 and repaid the existing $175.0 million in aggregate principal amount 13.5% senior subordinated notes due 2015, including accrued and unpaid interest and a call premium of approximately $5.3 million. The remaining proceeds were used to pay down $74.8 million of the Term Loan B and $10.0 million of the Revolver. A portion of the proceeds was placed in a restricted account pending application to finance certain acquisitions, including the acquisitions of a radiation treatment center and physician practices in South Carolina consummated on May 3, 2010. The Company incurred approximately $11.9 million in transaction fees and expenses, including legal, accounting and other fees and expenses associated with the offering, and the initial purchasers’ discount of $1.9 million.

 

In March 2011, 21C issued to DDJ Capital Management, LLC, $50 million in aggregate principal amount of 97/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017. The proceeds of $48.5 million were used (i) to fund the Company’s acquisition of all of the outstanding membership units of MDLLC and substantially all of the interests of MDLLC’s affiliated companies (the “MDLLC Acquisition”), not then controlled by the Company and (ii) to fund transaction costs associated with the MDLLC Acquisition. An additional $16.25 million in senior subordinated notes were issued to the seller in the transaction. In August 2013, we issued an additional $3.8 million of Senior Subordinated notes to the seller as a component of the MDLLC earn-out amount.

 

Senior Secured Second Lien Notes

 

On May 10, 2012, the Company issued $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 7/8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2017 (the “Secured Notes”).

 

The Secured Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated May 10, 2012 (the “Secured Notes Indenture”), among 21C, the guarantors signatory thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association. The Secured Notes are senior secured second lien obligations of 21C and are guaranteed on a senior secured second lien basis by 21C, and each of 21C’s domestic subsidiaries to the extent such guarantor is a guarantor of 21C’s obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below).

 

Interest is payable on the Secured Notes on each May 15 and November 15, commencing November 15, 2012. On or after May 15, 2014, 21C may redeem some or all of the Secured Notes at redemption prices set forth in the Secured Notes Indenture.

 

The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company, 21C and certain of its subsidiaries to: incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock; make other restricted payments; incur liens;

 

23



Table of Contents

 

redeem debt that is junior in right of payment to the Notes; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries; enter into mergers or consolidations; and enter into transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. In addition, in certain circumstances, if 21C sells assets or experiences certain changes of control, it must offer to purchase the Notes.

 

21C used the proceeds to repay its existing senior secured revolving credit facility of approximately $63.0 million and the Term Loan B portion of approximately $265.4 million, of its senior secured credit facilities, which were prepaid in their entirety, cancelled and replaced with the new Revolving Credit Facility described below, and to pay related fees and expenses. Any remaining net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes. 21C incurred approximately $14.4 million in transaction fees and expenses, including legal, accounting and other fees and expenses associated with the offering, and the initial purchasers’ discount of $1.7 million.

 

Senior Secured Notes

 

On October 25, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of OnCure. The transaction included the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes of OnCure, which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and mature January 15, 2017, of which $7.5 million is subject to escrow arrangements and will be released to holders upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Interest is payable on the Secured Notes on each January 15 and July 15, commencing July 15, 2014.

 

Senior Secured Credit Facility

 

On May 10, 2012, 21C entered into the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) among 21C, as borrower, the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”), collateral agent, issuing bank and as swingline lender, the other agents party thereto and the lenders party thereto. On August 28, 2013, 21C entered into an Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) to the credit agreement among 21C, the Company, the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, the Administrative Agent named therein and the other agents and arrangers named therein, dated as of May 10, 2012 (the “Original Credit Agreement” and, as amended and restated by the Amendment Agreement, the “Credit Agreement”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Amendment Agreement, the amendments to the Original Credit Agreement became effective on August 29, 2013.

 

The Credit Agreement provides for credit facilities consisting of (i) a $90 million term loan facility (the “Term Facility”) and (ii) a revolving credit facility provided for up to $100 million of revolving extensions of credit outstanding at any time (including revolving loans, swingline loans and letters of credit) (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and together with the Term Facility, the “Credit Facilities”).  The Term Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility each have a maturity date of October 15, 2016.

 

Loans under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Facility are subject to the following interest rates:

 

(a) for loans which are Eurodollar loans, for any interest period, at a rate per annum equal to (i) a floating index rate per annum equal to (A) the rate per annum determined on the basis of the rate for deposits in dollars for a period equal to such interest period commencing on the first day of such interest period appearing on Reuters Screen LIBOR01 Page as of 11:00 A.M., London time, two business days prior to the beginning of such interest period divided by (B) 1.0 minus the then stated maximum rate of all reserve requirements applicable to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System in respect of eurocurrency funding or liabilities as defined in Regulation D (or any successor category of liabilities under Regulation D) (provided that solely with respect to loans under the Term Facility, such floating index rate shall not be less than 1.00% per annum), plus (ii) an applicable margin (A) based upon a total leverage pricing grid for loans under the Revolving Credit Facility or (B) equal to 6.50% per annum for loans under the Term Facility; and

 

(b) for loans which are base rate loans, at a rate per annum equal to (i) a floating index rate per annum equal to the greatest of (A) the Administrative Agent’s prime lending rate at such time, (B) the overnight federal funds rate at such time plus ½ of 1%, and (C) the Eurodollar Rate for a Eurodollar loan with a one- month interest period commencing on such day plus 1.00% (provided that solely with respect to loans under the Term Facility, such floating index rate shall not be less than 2.00% per annum), plus (ii) an applicable margin (A) based upon a total leverage pricing grid for loans under the Revolving Credit Facility or (B) equal to 5.50% per annum for loans under the Term Facility.

 

21C will pay certain recurring fees with respect to the Credit Facilities, including (i) fees on the unused commitments of the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility, (ii) letter of credit fees on the aggregate face amounts of outstanding letters of credit and (iii) administration fees.

 

The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, subject to limitations and exceptions, and customary covenants restricting the ability (subject to various exceptions) of 21C and certain of its subsidiaries to:  incur additional indebtedness (including guarantee obligations); incur liens; engage in mergers or other fundamental changes; sell certain property or assets; pay dividends of other distributions; consummate acquisitions; make investments, loans and advances; prepay certain indebtedness, change the nature of their business; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and incur restrictions on the ability of 21C’s subsidiaries to make distributions, advances and asset transfers.  In addition, as of the last business day of each month, 21C will be required to maintain a certain minimum amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus availability under the Revolving Credit Facility of not less than $15.0 million.

 

The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including with respect to nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts; material inaccuracy of a representation or warranty when made; failure to perform or observe covenants; cross default to other material indebtedness; bankruptcy and insolvency events; inability to pay debts; monetary judgment defaults; actual or asserted invalidity or impairment of any definitive loan documentation and a change of control.

 

The obligations of 21C under the Credit Facilities are guaranteed by the Company and certain direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of 21C.

 

The Credit Facilities and certain interest rate protection and other hedging arrangements provided by lenders under the Credit Facilities or its affiliates are secured on a first priority basis by security interests in substantially all of 21C’s and each guarantor’s tangible and intangible assets (subject to certain exceptions).

 

24



Table of Contents

 

The Revolving Credit Facility requires that the Company comply with certain financial covenants, including:

 

 

 

Requirement at
September 30,
2014

 

Level at
September 30,
2014

 

Minimum permitted unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus availability under the Revolving Credit Facility

 

>$

15.0 million

 

$

246.7 million

 

 

The Revolving Credit Facility also requires that the Company comply with various other covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on new indebtedness, asset sales, capital expenditures, acquisitions and dividends, with which the Company was in compliance as of September 30, 2014.

 

On April 15, 2014, the Company obtained a waiver of borrowing conditions due to a default of not providing audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 within 90 days after year end. The Company paid the administrative agent for the account of the Revolving Lenders a fee equal to 0.125% of such Lender’s aggregate Commitments. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility provides for a 30 day cure period for the filing of the audited annual financial statements. The default was cured with the provision of the audited financial statements to the administrative agent on April 30, 2014.

 

Purchase Money Note Purchase Agreement

 

On May 19, 2014, the Company entered into a Purchase Money Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with Theriac Management Investments, LLC (“Theriac”) (a related party real estate entity owned by certain of the Company’s directors and officers). Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, Theriac loaned to the Company, pursuant to an unsecured purchase money note, the principal amount of $7.4 million. The Company, and certain of its domestic subsidiaries of the Company, guaranteed the obligations under the note. The note will mature on June 15, 2015 and is subject to an interest rate payable in cash of 10.75% per annum or by adding the amount of such interest to the aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes at the interest rate of 12.0% per annum. The proceeds from the issuance of the note were used to pay for purchases or improvements of property and equipment or to refinance debt incurred to finance such purchases or improvements.

 

A portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the purchase money note purchase agreement on September 26, 2014.

 

MDLLC Credit and Guaranty Agreement

 

On July 28, 2014, Medical Developers, LLC (the “Borrower”), a Florida limited liability company and indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, including the Company, entered into a credit and guaranty agreement (the “MDLLC Credit Agreement”).

 

The MDLLC Credit Agreement provided for Tranche A term loans (the “Tranche A Term Loans”) in the aggregate principal amount of $8.5 million and Tranche B term loans (the “Tranche B Term Loans” together with the Tranche A Term Loans, the “Term Loans”) in the aggregate principal amount of $9.0 million, for an aggregate principal amount of Term Loans of $17.5 million, in favor of the Borrower.

 

The Term Loans were subject to interest rates, for any interest period, at a rate equal to 14.0% per annum.

 

A portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the MDLLC Credit and Guaranty Agreement on September 26, 2014.

 

Term Loan A and B Facilities

 

On February 10, 2014, 21C East Florida and South Florida Radiation Oncology Coconut Creek, LLC (“Coconut Creek”), a subsidiary of SFRO, as borrowers (the “Borrowers”) entered into a new credit agreement (the “SFRO Credit Agreement”).  The SFRO Credit Agreement provides for a $60 million Term B Loan in favor of 21C East Florida (“Term B Loan”) and $7.9 million Term A Loan in favor of Coconut Creek issued for purposes of refinancing existing SFRO debt (“Term A Loan” and together with the Term B Loan, the “SFRO Term Loans”).  The SFRO Term Loans each have a maturity date of January 15, 2017. The Company incurred approximately $1.0 million in deferred financing costs relating to the SFRO debt.

 

On July 22, 2014, 21C East Florida and Coconut Creek entered into a first amendment (the “SFRO Amendment”) to the SFRO Credit Agreement. The SFRO Amendment provided for an incremental $10.35 million term loan (the “Term A-1 Loan”) in favor of Coconut Creek issued for purposes of (i) refinancing approximately $5.64 million in existing capitalized lease obligations owing to First Financial Corporate Leasing, including a prepayment premium, (ii) repaying the approximately $2.55 million intercompany loan made by 21C to pay the capitalized lease obligations owing to First Financial Corporate Leasing and (iii) pay fees, costs and expenses of the transactions related to the SFRO Amendment.

 

The SFRO Term Loans were subject to variable interest rates. In addition, the Term B Loan contained a provision allowing 21C East Florida to elect payment in kind interest payments.

 

A portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the Company’s South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans on September 26, 2014.

 

25



Table of Contents

 

15. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company operates in a highly regulated and litigious industry. As a result, the Company is involved in disputes, litigation, and regulatory matters incidental to its operations, including governmental investigations, personal injury lawsuits, employment claims, and other matters arising out of the normal conduct of business.

 

Healthcare companies are subject to numerous types of investigations by various governmental agencies. Further, under the False Claims Act, private parties have the right to bring ‘‘qui tam,’’ or ‘‘whistleblower,’’ suits against companies that knew or should have known they were submitting false claims for payments to, or improperly retain overpayments from, the government. The False Claims Act imposes penalties of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000, plus three times the amount of damages which the government sustains because of the submission of a false claim. If the Company is found to have violated the False Claims Act, it could also be excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. Some states have adopted similar state whistleblower and false claims provisions. Certain of the Company’s facilities have received, and other facilities may receive, inquiries from federal and state agencies related to potential False Claims Act liability. Depending on whether the underlying conduct in these or future inquiries or investigations could be considered systemic, their resolution could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

 

Governmental agencies and their agents, such as the Medicare Administrative Contractors, as well as the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (‘‘OIG’’), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and state Medicaid programs, conduct audits of our healthcare operations. Private payers may conduct similar post-payment audits, and the Company also perform internal audits and monitoring. Depending on the nature of the conduct found in such audits and whether the underlying conduct could be considered systemic, the resolution of these audits could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

 

On February 18, 2014,  the Company was served with subpoenas from the OIG acting with the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida who together have requested the production of medical records of patients treated by certain of the Company’s physicians for the period from January 2007 to present regarding the ordering, billing and medical necessity of certain laboratory services as part of a civil False Claims Act investigation, as well as the Company’s agreements with such physicians. The laboratory services under review relate to the utilization of fluorescence in situ hybridization (“FISH”) laboratory tests ordered by certain of the Company’s employed physicians and performed by the Company.  The Company was served with another subpoena from the OIG on January 22, 2015, requesting additional documents related to this matter for the period from January 1, 2005 up through the production of documents responsive to the February 2014 subpoena.  The Company has recorded a liability for this matter of approximately $4.7 million and $5.1 million that is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, respectively.  The recorded estimate is based on a probability weighted analysis of the low-end of the range of the liability that considers the facts currently known by the Company, review of qualitative and quantitative factors, and an assessment of potential outcomes under different scenarios used to assess the Company’s exposure which may be used to determine a potential settlement should the Company decide not to litigate.  The Company’s recording of a liability related to this matter is not an admission of guilt. Depending on how this matter progresses, the exposure may be less than or more than the liability recorded and the Company will continue to reassess and adjust the liability until this matter is settled.  The Company’s estimate of the high-end of the range of exposure is $10.2 million.

 

The Company received two Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”), one on October 22, 2014 addressed to 21C and one on October 31, 2014 addressed to SFRO, from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) pursuant to the False Claims Act.  The CIDs request information concerning allegations that the Company knowingly billed for services that were not medically necessary and for services not rendered and appear to be focused on GAMMA services (which are dosimetry calculations performed during the course of radiation therapy).  The CIDs cover the period from January 1, 2009 to the present.  Among other information requests, the CIDs request certain documents and information related to the administration of radiation therapy; selection of various radiation therapies and GAMMA services.  The Company’s total billings to federal health care programs including Medicare, Medicare Advantage and Medicaid for GAMMA services from January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2014 is approximately $64 million.  It is not possible to predict when these matters will be resolved or what impact they might have on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

 

Based on reviews performed to date, the Company does not believe that it or its physicians knowingly submitted false claims in violation of applicable statutory or regulatory requirements. The Company is cooperating fully with the subpoena requests and the DOJ’s investigation.

 

In addition to the matters described below, the Company is involved in various legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of its business. It is the opinion of management, based on advice of legal counsel, that such litigation and claims will be resolved without material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

16. Segment and geographic information

 

The Company operates in one line of business, which is operating physician group practices. The Company’s operations are organized into two geographically organized groups: the U.S. Domestic operating segment and the International operating segment, which are also the reporting segments. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Transactions between reporting segments are properly eliminated. The Company assesses performance of and makes decisions on how to allocate resources to its operating segments based on multiple factors including current and projected facility gross profit and market opportunities. Facility gross profit is defined as total revenues less cost of revenues.

 

Financial information by geographic segment is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Total revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S Domestic

 

$

231,772

 

$

156,459

 

$

685,595

 

$

465,402

 

International

 

25,846

 

24,581

 

71,318

 

67,724

 

Total

 

$

257,618

 

$

181,040

 

$

756,913

 

$

533,126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facility gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Domestic

 

$

63,924

 

$

37,424

 

$

188,861

 

$

114,183

 

International

 

14,399

 

13,350

 

39,256

 

37,242

 

Total

 

$

78,323

 

$

50,774

 

$

228,117

 

$

151,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Domestic

 

$

21,097

 

$

14,977

 

$

61,509

 

$

43,316

 

International

 

1,291

 

1,082

 

3,763

 

3,234

 

Total

 

$

22,388

 

$

16,059

 

$

65,272

 

$

46,550

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures: *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Domestic

 

 

 

 

 

$

53,907

 

$

22,136

 

International

 

 

 

 

 

9,917

 

3,052

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

63,824

 

$

25,188

 

 


* includes capital lease obligations related to capital expenditures

 

26



Table of Contents

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

Total assets:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Domestic

 

$

1,038,320

 

$

993,075

 

International

 

145,995

 

135,116

 

Total

 

$

1,184,315

 

$

1,128,191

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Domestic

 

$

245,306

 

$

222,475

 

International

 

29,349

 

17,896

 

Total

 

$

274,655

 

$

240,371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition-related goodwill and intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Domestic

 

$

456,630

 

$

587,895

 

International

 

69,390

 

75,143

 

Total

 

$

526,020

 

$

663,038

 

 

The reconciliation of the Company’s reportable segment profit and loss is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three Months ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Facility gross profit

 

$

78,323

 

$

50,774

 

$

228,117

 

$

151,425

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses

 

37,811

 

24,936

 

101,985

 

68,832

 

General and administrative salaries

 

28,285

 

20,240

 

83,547

 

61,976

 

General and administrative depreciation and amortization

 

4,603

 

2,811

 

13,811

 

8,451

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

5,621

 

3,767

 

13,345

 

8,857

 

Interest expense, net

 

30,233

 

21,952

 

87,659

 

62,369

 

Impairment loss

 

47,526

 

 

229,526

 

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

8,558

 

 

8,558

 

 

Equity IPO expenses

 

742

 

 

4,905

 

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

209

 

 

612

 

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction

 

 

 

135

 

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture

 

 

 

 

(1,460

)

Foreign currency transaction loss

 

210

 

364

 

317

 

1,166

 

(Gain) loss on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

67

 

(4

)

309

 

Loss before income taxes

 

$

(85,475

)

$

(23,363

)

$

(316,279

)

$

(59,075

)

 

17. Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information

 

21C’s payment obligations under the senior secured credit facility, senior secured second lien notes, and senior subordinated notes are guaranteed by Parent, which owns 100% of 21C and certain domestic subsidiaries of 21C, all of which are, directly or indirectly, 100% owned by 21C (the “Subsidiary Guarantors” and, collectively with Parent, the “Guarantors”). Such guarantees are full, unconditional and joint and several. The consolidated joint ventures, foreign subsidiaries and professional corporations of the Company are non-guarantors. The following supplemental financial information sets forth, on an unconsolidated basis, balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), and statements of cash flows information for Parent, 21C, the Subsidiary Guarantors and the non-guarantor subsidiaries. The supplemental financial information reflects the investment of Parent and 21C and subsidiary guarantors using the equity method of accounting.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

as of September 30, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary
Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

125,781

 

$

123

 

$

18,305

 

$

16,512

 

$

 

$

160,721

 

Restricted cash

 

 

 

4,268

 

2,971

 

 

7,239

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

15

 

64,289

 

75,012

 

 

139,316

 

Intercompany receivables

 

175,637

 

403

 

111,424

 

 

(287,464

)

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

103

 

7,210

 

1,203

 

 

8,516

 

Inventories

 

 

 

4,167

 

429

 

 

4,596

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(118

)

(4,909

)

5,027

 

108

 

 

108

 

Other

 

 

 

7,381

 

956

 

 

8,337

 

Total current assets

 

301,300

 

(4,265

)

222,071

 

97,191

 

(287,464

)

328,833

 

Equity investments in joint ventures

 

(430,048

)

564,938

 

88,483

 

46

 

(221,823

)

1,596

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

 

205,359

 

69,296

 

 

274,655

 

Real estate subject to finance obligation

 

 

 

17,743

 

 

 

17,743

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

277,658

 

164,635

 

 

442,293

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

 

59,027

 

24,700

 

 

83,727

 

Other assets

 

 

13,459

 

15,439

 

6,570

 

 

35,468

 

Intercompany note receivable

 

23,778

 

7,250

 

1,117

 

 

(32,145

)

 

Total assets

 

$

(104,970

)

$

581,382

 

$

886,897

 

$

362,438

 

$

(541,432

)

$

1,184,315

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

 

$

786

 

$

64,784

 

$

20,563

 

$

 

$

86,133

 

Intercompany payables

 

 

186,409

 

 

101,055

 

(287,464

)

 

Accrued expenses

 

7,582

 

28,844

 

45,049

 

15,984

 

 

97,459

 

Income taxes payable

 

(144

)

1,069

 

(2,138

)

1,943

 

 

730

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

 

16,569

 

9,381

 

 

25,950

 

Current portion of finance obligation

 

 

 

361

 

 

 

361

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

 

10,306

 

1,712

 

 

12,018

 

Total current liabilities

 

7,438

 

217,108

 

134,931

 

150,638

 

(287,464

)

222,651

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

 

815,938

 

106,904

 

20,121

 

 

942,963

 

Finance obligation, less current portion

 

 

 

18,468

 

 

 

18,468

 

Embedded derivative features of Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

15,006

 

 

 

 

 

15,006

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

 

35,301

 

10,204

 

 

45,505

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(458

)

(24,721

)

27,820

 

1,968

 

 

4,609

 

Intercompany note payable

 

 

 

 

32,145

 

(32,145

)

 

Total liabilities

 

21,986

 

1,008,325

 

323,424

 

215,076

 

(319,609

)

1,249,202

 

Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

304,271

 

 

 

 

 

304,271

 

Noncontrolling interests—redeemable

 

 

 

 

30,303

 

15,684

 

45,987

 

Total 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder’s (deficit) equity

 

(431,227

)

(426,943

)

563,473

 

117,479

 

(254,009

)

(431,227

)

Noncontrolling interests—nonredeemable

 

 

 

 

(420

)

16,502

 

16,082

 

Total (deficit) equity

 

(431,227

)

(426,943

)

563,473

 

117,059

 

(237,507

)

(415,145

)

Total liabilities and (deficit) equity

 

$

(104,970

)

$

581,382

 

$

886,897

 

$

362,438

 

$

(541,432

)

$

1,184,315

 

 

28



Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary
Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue

 

$

 

$

 

$

129,033

 

$

109,370

 

$

 

$

238,403

 

Management fees

 

 

 

16,475

 

287

 

 

16,762

 

Other revenue

 

1

 

34

 

2,353

 

91

 

 

2,479

 

(Loss) income from equity investment

 

(87,925

)

(59,481

)

(816

)

 

148,196

 

(26

)

Intercompany revenue

 

 

283

 

22,538

 

 

(22,821

)

 

Total revenues

 

(87,924

)

(59,164

)

169,583

 

109,748

 

125,375

 

257,618

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

29

 

 

86,105

 

48,465

 

 

134,599

 

Medical supplies

 

 

 

17,119

 

7,652

 

 

24,771

 

Facility rent expenses

 

 

 

11,565

 

3,302

 

 

14,867

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

 

9,844

 

5,714

 

 

15,558

 

General and administrative expenses

 

2

 

1,598

 

29,366

 

6,845

 

 

37,811

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

17,967

 

4,421

 

 

22,388

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

4,053

 

1,568

 

 

5,621

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

22,299

 

4,008

 

3,926

 

 

30,233

 

Impairment loss

 

 

1,247

 

46,279

 

 

 

47,526

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

 

333

 

 

8,225

 

 

8,558

 

Equity initial public offering expenses

 

742

 

 

 

 

 

742

 

Electronic health records incentive payment

 

 

 

24

 

(24

)

 

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

 

 

209

 

 

 

209

 

Loss on foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

210

 

 

210

 

Gain on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intercompany expenses

 

 

 

 

22,821

 

(22,821

)

 

Total expenses

 

773

 

25,477

 

226,539

 

113,125

 

(22,821

)

343,093

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(88,697

)

(84,641

)

(56,956

)

(3,377

)

148,196

 

(85,475

)

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

454

 

(318

)

(895

)

1,932

 

 

1,173

 

Net (loss) income

 

(89,151

)

(84,323

)

(56,061

)

(5,309

)

148,196

 

(86,648

)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests—redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

 

3,448

 

(4,177

)

(729

)

Net (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

(89,151

)

(84,323

)

(56,061

)

(1,861

)

144,019

 

(87,377

)

Unrealized comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

(1,990

)

 

(1,990

)

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

(89,151

)

(84,323

)

(56,061

)

(7,299

)

148,196

 

(88,638

)

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests-redeemable and non-redeemable:

 

 

 

 

 

(512

)

(512

)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(89,151

)

$

(84,323

)

$

(56,061

)

$

(7,299

)

$

147,684

 

$

(89,150

)

 

29



Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary
Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue

 

$

 

$

 

$

393,625

 

$

304,636

 

$

 

$

698,261

 

Management fees

 

 

 

49,320

 

895

 

 

50,215

 

Other revenue

 

1

 

75

 

7,907

 

615

 

 

8,598

 

(Loss) income from equity investment

 

(331,121

)

(258,707

)

(6,918

)

9

 

596,576

 

(161

)

Intercompany revenue

 

 

728

 

64,831

 

 

(65,559

)

 

Total revenues

 

(331,120

)

(257,904

)

508,765

 

306,155

 

531,017

 

756,913

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

98

 

 

267,031

 

129,182

 

 

396,311

 

Medical supplies

 

 

 

50,083

 

20,924

 

 

71,007

 

Facility rent expenses

 

 

 

34,817

 

12,712

 

 

47,529

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

 

28,970

 

17,065

 

 

46,035

 

General and administrative expenses

 

14

 

1,962

 

82,186

 

17,823

 

 

101,985

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

53,045

 

12,227

 

 

65,272

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

9,410

 

3,935

 

 

13,345

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

66,513

 

12,059

 

9,087

 

 

87,659

 

Impairment loss

 

 

1,247

 

228,279

 

 

 

229,526

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

 

333

 

 

8,225

 

 

8,558

 

Equity initial public offering expenses

 

4,905

 

 

 

 

 

4,905

 

Electronic health records incentive payment

 

 

 

99

 

(99

)

 

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

135

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

 

 

612

 

 

 

612

 

Loss on foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

317

 

 

317

 

Gain on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

(4

)

Intercompany expenses

 

 

 

 

65,559

 

(65,559

)

 

Total expenses

 

5,017

 

70,051

 

766,726

 

296,957

 

(65,559

)

1,073,192

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(336,137

)

(327,955

)

(257,961

)

9,198

 

596,576

 

(316,279

)

Income tax (benifit) expense

 

454

 

62

 

(2,526

)

6,223

 

 

4,213

 

Net (loss) income

 

(336,591

)

(328,017

)

(255,435

)

2,975

 

596,576

 

(320,492

)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests—redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

 

1,463

 

(6,053

)

(4,590

)

Net (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

(336,591

)

(328,017

)

(255,435

)

4,438

 

590,523

 

(325,082

)

Unrealized comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

(12,596

)

 

(12,596

)

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

(336,591

)

(328,017

)

(255,435

)

(9,621

)

596,576

 

(333,088

)

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests-redeemable and non-redeemable:

 

 

 

 

 

(3,502

)

(3,502

)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(336,591

)

$

(328,017

)

$

(255,435

)

$

(9,621

)

$

593,074

 

$

(336,590

)

 

30



Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary
Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(336,591

)

$

(328,017

)

$

(255,435

)

$

2,975

 

$

596,576

 

$

(320,492

)

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

45,774

 

8,229

 

 

54,003

 

Amortization

 

 

 

7,271

 

3,998

 

 

11,269

 

Deferred rent expense

 

 

 

377

 

100

 

 

477

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

42

 

(1

)

597

 

 

638

 

Stock-based compensation

 

99

 

 

 

 

 

99

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

9,410

 

3,935

 

 

13,345

 

Loss on the sale of property and equipment

 

 

 

84

 

172

 

 

256

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

135

 

Impairment loss

 

 

1,247

 

228,279

 

 

 

229,526

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

 

333

 

 

8,225

 

 

8,558

 

Equity initial public offering expenses

 

4,905

 

 

 

 

 

4,905

 

Gain on foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

105

 

 

105

 

Gain on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

(4

)

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

 

 

612

 

 

 

612

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

1,355

 

55

 

625

 

 

2,035

 

Amortization of loan costs

 

 

4,387

 

 

434

 

 

4,821

 

Equity interest in net loss (earnings) of joint ventures

 

331,121

 

258,707

 

6,918

 

(9

)

(596,576

)

161

 

Distribution received from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

 

168

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable and other current assets

 

 

(10

)

(4,301

)

(27,006

)

 

(31,317

)

Income taxes payable

 

1,099

 

(1,725

)

(1,728

)

1,421

 

 

(933

)

Inventories

 

 

 

(552

)

357

 

 

(195

)

Prepaid expenses

 

 

24

 

1,959

 

764

 

 

2,747

 

Intercompany payable / receivable

 

(172,875

)

100,650

 

(5,472

)

77,697

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

70

 

192

 

6,454

 

5,604

 

 

12,320

 

Accrued deferred compensation

 

 

 

820

 

239

 

 

1,059

 

Accrued expenses / other current liabilities

 

790

 

17,142

 

1,055

 

(1,595

)

 

17,392

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

(171,382

)

54,323

 

41,882

 

86,867

 

 

11,690

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

 

(28,283

)

(15,986

)

 

(44,269

)

Acquisition of medical practices

 

 

 

925

 

(51,046

)

 

(50,121

)

Restricted cash associated with medical practices

 

 

2

 

(502

)

(2,971

)

 

(3,471

)

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment

 

 

 

37

 

54

 

 

91

 

Loans to employees

 

 

(1

)

(785

)

(85

)

 

(871

)

Intercompany notes to / from affiliates

 

(23,778

)

(3,400

)

(343

)

27,521

 

 

 

Contribution of capital to joint venture entities

 

 

(2,370

)

(239

)

 

1,989

 

(620

)

Distributions received from joint venture entities

 

 

504

 

2,342

 

 

(2,846

)

 

Proceeds (payment) of foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

26

 

Premiums on life insurance policies

 

 

 

(613

)

(238

)

 

(851

)

Change in other assets and other liabilities

 

 

 

(101

)

(155

)

 

(256

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(23,778

)

(5,239

)

(27,562

)

(42,906

)

(857

)

(100,342

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

60,400

 

5,650

 

98,506

 

 

164,556

 

Principal repayments of debt

 

 

(110,733

)

(12,332

)

(127,143

)

 

(250,208

)

Repayments of finance obligation

 

 

 

(167

)

 

 

(167

)

Proceeds from issuance of Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock

 

325,000

 

 

 

 

 

325,000

 

Proceeds from issuance of noncontrolling interest

 

 

1,250

 

 

 

 

1,250

 

Proceeds from noncontrolling interest holders — redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

1,750

 

468

 

(1,989

)

229

 

Cash distributions to noncontrolling interest holders—redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

(2,050

)

(2,050

)

Cash distributions to shareholders

 

 

 

 

(4,896

)

4,896

 

 

Payments of costs for equity securities offering

 

(4,220

)

 

 

 

 

(4,220

)

Payments of loan costs

 

 

 

 

(2,437

)

 

 

(2,437

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

320,780

 

(49,083

)

(5,099

)

(35,502

)

857

 

231,953

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

(42

)

 

(42

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

125,620

 

1

 

9,221

 

8,417

 

 

143,259

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

161

 

122

 

9,084

 

8,095

 

 

17,462

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

125,781

 

$

123

 

$

18,305

 

$

16,512

 

$

 

$

160,721

 

 

31



Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS

as of December 31, 2013

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

161

 

$

122

 

$

9,084

 

$

8,095

 

$

 

$

17,462

 

Restricted cash

 

 

2

 

3,766

 

 

 

3,768

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

5

 

67,752

 

49,287

 

 

117,044

 

Intercompany receivables

 

2,762

 

 

105,468

 

 

(108,230

)

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

127

 

6,665

 

785

 

 

7,577

 

Inventories

 

 

 

3,622

 

771

 

 

4,393

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(118

)

(4,909

)

5,027

 

375

 

 

375

 

Other

 

1,323

 

21

 

11,137

 

53

 

 

12,534

 

Total current assets

 

4,128

 

(4,632

)

212,521

 

59,366

 

(108,230

)

163,153

 

Equity investments in subsidiaries

 

(99,011

)

823,941

 

97,672

 

42

 

(820,089

)

2,555

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

 

203,378

 

36,993

 

 

240,371

 

Real estate subject to finance obligation

 

 

 

19,239

 

 

 

19,239

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

506,791

 

71,222

 

 

578,013

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

 

66,140

 

18,885

 

 

85,025

 

Other assets

 

 

18,096

 

15,634

 

6,105

 

 

39,835

 

Intercompany note receivable

 

 

3,850

 

774

 

 

(4,624

)

 

Total assets

 

$

(94,883

)

$

841,255

 

$

1,122,149

 

$

192,613

 

$

(932,943

)

$

1,128,191

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

569

 

$

595

 

$

49,234

 

$

7,215

 

$

 

$

57,613

 

Intercompany payables

 

 

85,356

 

 

22,874

 

(108,230

)

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

11,702

 

42,198

 

10,121

 

 

64,021

 

Income taxes payable

 

(1,243

)

2,794

 

(411

)

1,232

 

 

2,372

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

 

14,048

 

3,488

 

 

17,536

 

Current portion of finance obligation

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

317

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

 

10,908

 

1,329

 

 

12,237

 

Total current liabilities

 

(674

)

100,447

 

116,294

 

46,259

 

(108,230

)

154,096

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

 

864,582

 

108,540

 

1,008

 

 

974,130

 

Finance obligation, less current portion

 

 

 

20,333

 

 

 

20,333

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

 

32,250

 

6,203

 

 

38,453

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(458

)

(24,763

)

27,820

 

1,899

 

 

4,498

 

Intercompany note payable

 

 

 

 

4,624

 

(4,624

)

 

Total liabilities

 

(1,132

)

940,266

 

305,237

 

59,993

 

(112,854

)

1,191,510

 

Noncontrolling interests—redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

15,899

 

15,899

 

Total 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder’s (deficit) equity

 

(93,751

)

(99,011

)

816,912

 

132,620

 

(850,521

)

(93,751

)

Noncontrolling interests—nonredeemable

 

 

 

 

 

14,533

 

14,533

 

Total (deficit) equity

 

(93,751

)

(99,011

)

816,912

 

132,620

 

(835,988

)

(79,218

)

Total liabilities and (deficit) equity

 

$

(94,883

)

$

841,255

 

$

1,122,149

 

$

192,613

 

$

(932,943

)

$

1,128,191

 

 

32



Table of Contents

 

CONSENDSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary
Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue

 

$

 

$

 

$

112,729

 

$

65,926

 

$

 

$

178,655

 

Other revenue

 

 

 

2,302

 

176

 

 

2,478

 

(Loss) income from equity investment

 

(29,180

)

(8,402

)

(3,438

)

4

 

40,923

 

(93

)

Intercompany revenue

 

 

252

 

18,972

 

 

(19,224

)

 

Total revenues

 

(29,180

)

(8,150

)

130,565

 

66,106

 

21,699

 

181,040

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

135

 

 

72,027

 

25,870

 

 

98,032

 

Medical supplies

 

 

 

12,562

 

3,355

 

 

15,917

 

Facility rent expenses

 

 

 

9,408

 

2,019

 

 

11,427

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

 

7,959

 

3,923

 

 

11,882

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

309

 

19,823

 

4,804

 

 

24,936

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

13,901

 

2,158

 

 

16,059

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

2,410

 

1,357

 

 

3,767

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

20,538

 

845

 

569

 

 

21,952

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

364

 

 

364

 

Loss on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

67

 

Intercompany expenses

 

 

 

 

19,224

 

(19,224

)

 

Total expenses

 

135

 

20,914

 

138,935

 

63,643

 

(19,224

)

204,403

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(29,315

)

(29,064

)

(8,370

)

2,463

 

40,923

 

(23,363

)

Income tax expense

 

 

116

 

 

1,583

 

 

1,699

 

Net (loss) income

 

(29,315

)

(29,180

)

(8,370

)

880

 

40,923

 

(25,062

)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests—redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

(347

)

(347

)

Net (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

(29,315

)

(29,180

)

(8,370

)

880

 

40,576

 

(25,409

)

Unrealized comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

(4,228

)

 

(4,228

)

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

(29,315

)

(29,180

)

(8,370

)

(3,348

)

40,923

 

(29,290

)

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests-redeemable and non-redeemable:

 

 

 

 

 

(25

)

(25

)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(29,315

)

$

(29,180

)

$

(8,370

)

$

(3,348

)

$

40,898

 

$

(29,315

)

 

33



Table of Contents

 

CONSENDSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary
Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue

 

$

 

$

 

$

340,692

 

$

185,783

 

$

 

$

526,475

 

Other revenue

 

 

 

6,828

 

248

 

 

7,076

 

(Loss) income from equity investment

 

(73,776

)

(13,636

)

(6,577

)

11

 

93,553

 

(425

)

Intercompany revenue

 

 

627

 

57,587

 

 

(58,214

)

 

Total revenues

 

(73,776

)

(13,009

)

398,530

 

186,042

 

35,339

 

533,126

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

481

 

 

222,099

 

71,392

 

 

293,972

 

Medical supplies

 

 

 

38,308

 

7,858

 

 

46,166

 

Facility rent expenses

 

 

 

27,011

 

5,274

 

 

32,285

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

 

22,528

 

10,627

 

 

33,155

 

General and administrative expenses

 

 

948

 

55,329

 

12,555

 

 

68,832

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

40,385

 

6,165

 

 

46,550

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

5,403

 

3,454

 

 

8,857

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

59,356

 

2,302

 

711

 

 

62,369

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture

 

 

 

(1,460

)

 

 

(1,460

)

Loss foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

1,166

 

 

1,166

 

Loss on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

309

 

 

 

 

309

 

Intercompany expenses

 

 

 

 

58,214

 

(58,214

)

 

Total expenses

 

481

 

60,613

 

411,905

 

177,416

 

(58,214

)

592,201

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(74,257

)

(73,622

)

(13,375

)

8,626

 

93,553

 

(59,075

)

Income tax expense

 

 

154

 

 

4,695

 

 

4,849

 

Net (loss) income

 

(74,257

)

(73,776

)

(13,375

)

3,931

 

93,553

 

(63,924

)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests—redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

(1,365

)

(1,365

)

Net (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

(74,257

)

(73,776

)

(13,375

)

3,931

 

92,188

 

(65,289

)

Unrealized comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

(9,817

)

 

(9,817

)

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

(74,257

)

(73,776

)

(13,375

)

(5,886

)

93,553

 

(73,741

)

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests-redeemable and non-redeemable:

 

 

 

 

 

(516

)

(516

)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(74,257

)

$

(73,776

)

$

(13,375

)

$

(5,886

)

$

93,037

 

$

(74,257

)

 

34



Table of Contents

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Parent

 

21C

 

Subsidiary
Guarantors

 

Subsidiary
Non-
Guarantors

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(74,257

)

$

(73,776

)

$

(13,375

)

$

3,931

 

$

93,553

 

$

(63,924

)

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

 

34,971

 

5,091

 

 

40,062

 

Amortization

 

 

 

5,414

 

1,074

 

 

6,488

 

Deferred rent expense

 

 

 

491

 

145

 

 

636

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(316

)

230

 

(1,903

)

 

(1,989

)

Stock-based compensation

 

481

 

 

 

 

 

481

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

5,403

 

3,454

 

 

8,857

 

Loss on the sale of property and equipment

 

 

 

153

 

59

 

 

212

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture

 

 

 

(1,460

)

 

 

(1,460

)

Loss on foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

137

 

 

137

 

Loss on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

309

 

 

 

 

309

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

660

 

43

 

 

 

703

 

Amortization of loan costs

 

 

4,128

 

 

 

 

4,128

 

Equity interest in net loss (earnings) of joint ventures

 

73,776

 

13,636

 

6,577

 

(11

)

(93,553

)

425

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable and other current assets

 

 

 

(10,000

)

(15,578

)

 

(25,578

)

Income taxes payable

 

 

39

 

(388

)

692

 

 

343

 

Inventories

 

 

 

(552

)

(39

)

 

(591

)

Prepaid expenses

 

 

(12

)

75

 

131

 

 

194

 

Intercompany payable / receivable

 

(23

)

(31,486

)

24,439

 

7,070

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

 

74

 

9,936

 

2,581

 

 

12,591

 

Accrued deferred compensation

 

 

 

830

 

189

 

 

1,019

 

Accrued expenses / other current liabilities

 

 

16,653

 

1,873

 

993

 

 

19,519

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 

(23

)

(70,091

)

64,660

 

8,016

 

 

2,562

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

 

(20,990

)

(4,119

)

 

(25,109

)

Acquisition of medical practices

 

 

 

(23,050

)

(1,200

)

 

(24,250

)

Purchase of noncontrolling interest - non-redeemable

 

 

(1,509

)

 

 

 

(1,509

)

Restricted cash associated with medical practices

 

 

(5,002

)

 

 

 

(5,002

)

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

64

 

Loans to employees

 

 

 

(558

)

(1

)

 

(559

)

Intercompany notes to / from affiliates

 

 

(2,100

)

(411

)

2,511

 

 

 

Contribution of capital to joint venture entities

 

 

(542

)

(935

)

 

935

 

(542

)

Distributions received from joint venture entities

 

 

559

 

1,468

 

 

(2,027

)

 

Proceeds from the sale of equity interest in a joint venture

 

 

 

1,460

 

 

 

1,460

 

Payment of foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

(171

)

 

 

 

(171

)

Premiums on life insurance policies

 

 

 

(712

)

(189

)

 

(901

)

Change in other assets and other liabilities

 

 

(49

)

(8

)

4

 

 

(53

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(8,814

)

(43,672

)

(2,994

)

(1,092

)

(56,572

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

204,750

 

 

2,900

 

 

207,650

 

Principal repayments of debt

 

 

(124,500

)

(5,637

)

(3,780

)

 

(133,917

)

Repayments of finance obligation

 

 

 

(142

)

 

 

(142

)

Proceeds from equity contribution

 

 

 

 

1,700

 

(1,700

)

 

Proceeds from noncontrolling interest holders—redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

765

 

765

 

Cash distributions to noncontrolling interest holders—redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

(1,896

)

(1,896

)

Cash distributions to shareholders

 

 

 

 

(3,923

)

3,923

 

 

Payment of loan costs

 

 

(1,359

)

 

 

 

(1,359

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

78,891

 

(5,779

)

(3,103

)

1,092

 

71,101

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

(32

)

 

(32

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(23

)

(14

)

15,209

 

1,887

 

 

17,059

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

168

 

124

 

6,545

 

8,573

 

 

15,410

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

145

 

$

110

 

$

21,754

 

$

10,460

 

$

 

$

32,469

 

 

35



Table of Contents

 

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.  This section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties, such as statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. These statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “could”, “estimate”, “intend”, “may”, “might”, “plan”, “potential”, “predict”, “should”, or “will” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While we believe these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These and other important factors, including those discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the section titled “Risk Factors” and in the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-K”) may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply on and as of the date of this Form 10-Q. References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “we”, “us”, “our” and “the Company and Parent” are references to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, consolidated professional corporations and associations and unconsolidated affiliates, unless the context requires otherwise. References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “our treatment centers” refer to owned, managed and hospital based treatment centers.

 

Overview

 

We are the leading global, physician-led provider of integrated cancer care (“ICC”) services. Our physicians provide comprehensive, academic quality, cost-effective coordinated care for cancer patients in personal and convenient community settings (our “ICC model”). We believe we offer a powerful value proposition to patients, hospital systems, payers and risk-taking physician groups by delivering high quality care and good clinical outcomes at lower overall costs through outpatient settings, clinical excellence, physician coordination and scaled efficiency.

 

We operate the largest integrated network of cancer treatment centers and affiliated physicians in the world which, as of September 30, 2014, was comprised of approximately 794 community-based physicians in the fields of radiation oncology, medical oncology, breast, gynecological and general surgery, urology and primary care. Our physicians provide medical services at approximately 391 locations, including our 178 radiation therapy centers. Of the 178 treatment centers, 34 treatment centers were internally developed, 133 were acquired (including three which were transitioned from professional and other arrangements to freestanding), and 11 are operated under professional and other services arrangements. 48 radiation therapy centers operate in partnership with health systems and other clinics and community-based sites. Our 143 cancer treatment centers in the United States are operated predominantly under the 21st Century Oncology brand and are strategically clustered in 31 local markets in 16 states, including Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Rhode Island, and West Virginia. Our 35 international treatment centers in Latin America are operated under the 21st Century Oncology brand or a local brand and, in many cases, are operated with local minority partners, including hospitals. We hold market leading positions in the majority of our local markets and continue to expand our affiliation with physician specialties in closely related areas including gynecological, breast and surgical oncology, medical oncology and urology in a number of our local markets to strengthen our clinical working relationships and to evolve from a freestanding radiation oncology centric model to an ICC model.

 

We use a number of metrics to assist management in evaluating financial condition and operating performance, and the most important follow:

 

·                  the number of Relative Value Units (“RVUs”) (a standard measure of value used in the U.S. Medicare reimbursement formula for physician services) delivered per day in our freestanding centers;

 

·                  the percentage change in RVUs per day in our freestanding centers;

 

·                  the number of treatments delivered per day in our freestanding centers;

 

·                  the average revenue per treatment in our freestanding centers;

 

·                  the number and type of radiation oncology cases completed;

 

·                  the number of treatments per radiation oncology case completed;

 

·                  the revenue per radiation oncology case;

 

·                  the ratio of funded debt to pro-forma adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (leverage ratio); and

 

·                  facility gross profit.

 

Revenue Drivers

 

Our revenue growth is primarily driven by expanding the number of our centers, optimizing the utilization of advanced technologies at our existing centers and benefiting from demographic and population trends in most of our local markets and by providing value added services

 

36



Table of Contents

 

to other healthcare and provider organizations. New centers are added or acquired based on capacity, demographics and competitive considerations.

 

The average revenue per treatment is sensitive to the mix of services used in treating a patient’s tumor. The reimbursement rates set by Medicare and commercial payers tend to be higher for more advanced treatment technologies, reflecting their higher complexity. A key part of our business strategy is to make advanced technologies available once supporting economics exist. For example, we have been utilizing IGRT and Gamma Function, a proprietary capability to enable measurement of the actual amount of radiation delivered during a treatment and to provide immediate feedback for adaption of future treatments as well as for quality assurance, where appropriate, now that reimbursement codes are in place for these services.

 

Operating Costs

 

The principal costs of operating a treatment center are (1) the salary and benefits of the physician and technical staff, and (2) equipment and facility costs. The capacity of each physician and technical position is limited to a number of delivered treatments, while equipment and facility costs for a treatment center are generally fixed. These capacity factors cause profitability to be very sensitive to treatment volume. Profitability will tend to increase as resources from fixed costs including equipment and facility costs are utilized.

 

Sources of Revenue By Payer

 

We receive payments for our services rendered to patients from the government Medicare and Medicaid programs, commercial insurers, managed care organizations and our patients directly. Generally, our revenue is determined by a number of factors, including the payer mix, the number and nature of procedures performed and the rate of payment for the procedures. The following table sets forth the percentage of our U.S. domestic net patient service revenue we earned based upon the patients’ primary insurance by category of payer in our last fiscal year and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

U.S. Domestic

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Payer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Medicare

 

41.9

%

39.8

%

42.0

%

Commercial

 

54.3

 

57.0

 

54.4

 

Medicaid

 

2.7

 

2.3

 

2.6

 

Self pay

 

1.1

 

0.9

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total U.S. domestic net patient service revenue

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

 

Medicare and Medicaid

 

Medicare is a major funding source for the services we provide and government reimbursement developments can have a material effect on operating performance. These developments include the reimbursement amount for each Current Procedural Terminology (“CPT”) service that we provide and the specific CPT services covered by Medicare. CMS, the government agency responsible for administering the Medicare program, administers an annual process for considering changes in reimbursement rates and covered services. We have played, and will continue to play, a role in that process both directly and through the radiation oncology professional societies.

 

Since cancer disproportionately affects elderly people, a significant portion of our U.S. net patient service revenue is derived from the Medicare program, as well as related co-payments. Medicare reimbursement rates are determined by CMS and are lower than our normal charges. Medicaid reimbursement rates are typically lower than Medicare rates; Medicaid payments represent approximately 2.3% of our U.S. net patient service revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

 

In the final Medicare 2013 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS reduced payments for radiation oncology by 7%. This reduction related to (1) the fourth year of the four-year transition to the utilization of new Physician Practice Information Survey (“PPIS”) data, (2) a change in equipment interest rate assumptions, (3) budget neutrality effects of a proposal to create a new discharge care management code, (4) input changes for certain radiation therapy procedures, and (5) certain other revised radiation oncology codes. The largest of these changes (accounting for 4% of the gross reduction) reflected the transition of the final 25% of PPIS data used in the PERVU methodology. The change in the CMS interest rate policy (accounting for 3% of the gross reduction) reduced interest rate assumptions in the CMS database from 11% to a sliding scale of 5.5% to 8%. CMS also finalized its proposal to create a HCPCS G-code to describe transition care management from a hospital or other institutional stay to a primary physician in the community (accounting for 1% of the gross reduction). While this policy benefited primary care, non-primary care physicians are negatively impacted due to the budget-neutrality of the Medicare 2013 Physician Fee Schedule. The rule also made adjustments (accounting for 1% of the gross reduction) due to the use of new time of care assumptions for IMRT and SBRT. Although the proposed reductions in time of care assumptions alone would have resulted in a gross 7% reduction to radiation oncology, CMS in its final rule included updated cost data submitted by the radiation oncology community for code inputs which reversed the vast majority of the reduction resulting from the new time of care assumptions. Total gross reductions in the final rule were offset by a 2% increase due to certain other revised radiation oncology codes, which resulted in a total net reduction to radiation oncology of 7%.

 

In the final Medicare 2014 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS did not finalize its proposal to cap certain radiation oncology services at the hospital outpatient department and ambulatory surgical center’s rate. Although CMS did finalize its proposal to revise the Medicare Economic Index (“MEI”) [-2% impact], CMS also incorporated updated relative value units (“RVUs”) for new and existing codes [+3% impact] resulting in a net impact of +1% for radiation oncology overall. Because the MEI policy only applies to freestanding settings, the impact to freestanding centers is approximately flat, while hospital-based radiation oncologists would receive an increase in payment under the final rule.

 

37



Table of Contents

 

In the proposed Medicare 2015 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS proposed to reduce payments for radiation oncology by 4% overall.  This reduction related primarily to a proposal to remove the radiation treatment vault as a direct cost input for radiation treatment delivery codes.  Because the proposal only applied to freestanding settings, the cut to freestanding centers would likely have been closer to 5%, while hospital based radiation oncologists would have received an increase in payment under the proposal. In the final Medicare 2015 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS did not finalize its proposal to remove the radiation treatment vault as a direct cost input for radiation treatment delivery codes. As a result, the net impact of the Final Rule to radiation oncology and freestanding radiation therapy centers is approximately neutral overall. In the Final rule, CMS also indicated it would review the family of radiation treatment delivery codes in the CY 2016 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

 

Medicare reimbursement rates for all procedures under Medicare ultimately are determined by a formula which takes into account a conversion factor (“CF”) which is updated on an annual basis based on the Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”).  For the last several years, the SGR policy has threatened significant cuts to the CF, although Congress has consistently delayed those cuts. On April 1, 2014, the President signed H.R. 4302, the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 which extended the $35.8228 conversion factor through 2014 and also provided for a zero percent update through March 31, 2015.  If future SGR reductions are not suspended, and if a permanent “doc fix” is not signed into law, the currently scheduled SGR reimbursement decrease (estimated at more than 20%) will take effect on April 1, 2015. Due to budget neutrality requirements from certain policies in the final Medicare 2015 Physician Fee Schedule, the 2015 conversion factor would be slightly adjusted to $35.8013, assuming no SGR cuts.

 

In addition, under the Budget Control Act of 2011, Medicare providers are cut under a sequestration process by 2% each year relative to baseline spending through 2021. This policy was subsequently extended through 2024.  In the Protecting Access to Medicare Act, the sequestration policy was frontloaded for the year 2024 such that Medicare providers would be cut 4% in the first half of 2024 and 0% in the second half of 2024.

 

Commercial

 

Commercial sources include private health insurance as well as related payments for co-insurance and co-payments. We enter into contracts with private health insurance and other health benefit groups by granting discounts to such organizations in return for the patient volume they provide.

 

Most of our commercial revenue is from managed care business and is attributable to contracts where a set fee is negotiated relative to services provided by our treatment centers. We do not have any contracts that individually represent over 10% of our total U.S. net patient service revenue. We receive our managed care contracted revenue under two primary arrangements. Approximately 97% of our managed care business is attributable to contracts where a fee schedule is negotiated for services provided at our treatment centers. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 approximately 3% of our U.S. net patient service revenue is attributable to contracts where we bear utilization risk. Although the terms and conditions of our managed care contracts vary considerably, they are typically for a one-year term and provide for automatic renewals. If payments by managed care organizations and other private third-party payers decrease, then our total revenues and net income would decrease.

 

Self-Pay

 

Self-pay consists of payments for treatments by patients not otherwise covered by third-party payers, such as government or commercial sources. Because the incidence of cancer is much higher in those over the age of 65, most of our patients have access to Medicare or other insurance and therefore the self-pay portion of our business is less than it would be in other circumstances. However, we are seeing a general increase in the patient responsibility portion of our claims and revenue.

 

We grant a discount on gross charges to self-pay patients not covered under other third party payer arrangements. The discount amounts are excluded from patient service revenue. To the extent that we realize additional losses resulting from nonpayment of the discounted charges, such additional losses are included in the provision for doubtful accounts.

 

Other Material Factors

 

Other material factors that we believe will also impact our future financial performance include:

 

·                  our substantial indebtedness;

 

·                  patient volume and census;

 

·                  continued advances in technology and the related capital requirements;

 

·                  continued affiliation with physician specialties other than radiation oncology;

 

·                  our ability to develop and conduct business with hospitals and other large healthcare organizations in a manner that adequately and attractively compensates us for our services;

 

·                  accounting for business combinations requiring that all acquisition-related costs be expensed as incurred;

 

·                  our ability to achieve identified cost savings and operational efficiencies;

 

·                  increased costs associated with development and optimization of our internal infrastructure; and

 

·                  healthcare reform.

 

38



Table of Contents

 

Recent Developments

 

On September 26, 2014, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) with Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (“CPPIB”). Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement, the Company issued to CPPIB an aggregate of 385,000 newly issued shares of its Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, stated value $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), for a purchase price of $325.0 million.

 

This equity investment provides us with substantial incremental liquidity, significantly reduces our debt, and provides the necessary long-term capital to continue to grow our business.  As further described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, a portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repay all obligations under the South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans, repay certain other debt and capital leases, as well as provide capital for near-term strategic initiatives and general corporate purposes.  As a result of this investment, the Recapitalization Support Agreement that we entered into in July was terminated in accordance with its terms, and our senior subordinated notes will remain outstanding and unmodified.  For further information regarding the Subscription Agreement and Series A Preferred Stock, see Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein.

 

39



Table of Contents

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table summarizes key operating statistics of our results of operations for our domestic U.S. operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

United States

 

2014

 

2013

 

% Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

% Change

 

Number of treatment days

 

64

 

64

 

0.0

%

191

 

191

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total RVU’s — freestanding centers

 

4,014,187

 

2,767,016

 

45.1

%

11,879,135

 

8,313,913

 

42.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RVU’s per day — freestanding centers

 

62,722

 

43,235

 

45.1

%

62,194

 

43,528

 

42.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage change in RVU’s per day - freestanding centers - same market basis

 

(1.3

)%

(1.9

)%

 

 

(0.6

)%

(4.8

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total treatments - freestanding centers

 

200,654

 

128,765

 

55.8

%

595,958

 

386,574

 

54.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatments per day - freestanding centers

 

3,135

 

2,012

 

55.8

%

3,120

 

2,024

 

54.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage change in revenue per treatment freestanding centers — same market basis

 

1.1

%

(4.2

)%

 

 

3.6

%

(5.9

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage change in treatments per day freestanding centers — same market basis

 

2.4

%

6.4

%

 

 

2.7

%

3.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage change in freestanding revenues same market basis

 

3.5

%

3.5

%

 

 

6.4

%

(2.9

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Radiation oncology cases completed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3-D cases

 

2,081

 

1,929

 

 

 

5,918

 

5,534

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMRT cases

 

3,269

 

3,039

 

 

 

9,483

 

8,844

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other cases

 

565

 

484

 

 

 

1,671

 

1,534

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total radiation oncology cases completed

 

5,915

 

5,452

 

8.5

%

17,072

 

15,912

 

7.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatments per radiation oncology case completed

 

23.8

 

22.9

 

 

 

23.9

 

23.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue per radiation oncology case

 

$

18,854

 

$

18,044

 

 

 

$

19,103

 

$

18,816

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of employed, contracted and affiliated physicians:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Radiation oncologists

 

183

 

116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Urologists

 

170

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Surgeons

 

50

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Medical oncologists

 

41

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gynecologic oncologists

 

9

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other physicians

 

25

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affiliated physicians

 

316

 

269

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total physicians

 

794

 

581

 

36.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment centers - freestanding (global)

 

167

 

127

 

31.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment centers — hospital / other groups (global)

 

11

 

5

 

120.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total treatment centers

 

178

 

132

 

34.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Days sales outstanding at quarter end

 

41

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

United States

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue (global) — professional services only (in thousands)

 

$

78,001

 

$

54,338

 

$

230,919

 

$

159,816

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue (global) — excluding physician practice expense (in thousands)

 

$

260,953

 

$

178,655

 

$

764,595

 

$

526,475

 

 

The following table summarizes key operating statistics of our results of operations for our international operations, which are operated through Medical Developers, LLC (“MDLLC”) and its subsidiaries for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

International 

 

2014

 

2013

 

% Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

% Change

 

Number of new cases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2-D cases

 

745

 

931

 

 

 

2,318

 

2,868

 

 

 

3-D cases

 

2,943

 

2,855

 

 

 

8,862

 

7,639

 

 

 

IMRT / IGRT cases

 

792

 

590

 

 

 

2,181

 

1,396

 

 

 

Total

 

4,480

 

4,376

 

2.4

%

13,361

 

11,903

 

12.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue per radiation oncology case

 

$

5,761

 

$

5,617

 

 

 

$

5,328

 

$

5,698

 

 

 

 

International

 

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

 

MDLLC’s total revenues increased $1.2 million, or 5.1%, from $24.6 million to $25.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.  Total revenue was positively impacted by $0.7 million of revenue from the acquisition of a center in Guatemala City, Guatemala in January 2014, growth in cases and an improvement in treatment mix offset by the impact of a depreciation in the Argentine Peso as compared to the same period in 2013.  Case growth increased by 104 or 2.4% during the quarter.  The trend toward more clinically-advanced treatments, which require more time to complete, continued during the quarter with an increase in the number of higher-revenue IMRT/IGRT treatments and 3D treatments versus 2D treatments as compared to the same period in 2013.

 

Facility gross profit increased $1.0 million, or 7.9% from $13.4 million to $14.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.  Facility-level gross profit as a percentage of total revenues increased to 55.7% from 54.3%. Lower physician compensation, salaries and benefits, and repairs and maintenance costs as a percentage of revenues offset increases in facility rent, and incremental depreciation expense relating to our continued growth and investment in Latin America, and expenses related to two centers which are anticipated to open later in 2014.

 

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

 

MDLLC’s total revenues increased $3.6 million, or 5.3%, from $67.7 million to $71.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.  Total revenue was positively impacted by $1.7 million of revenue from the acquisition of a center in Guatemala City, Guatemala in January 2014, growth in cases and an improvement in treatment mix offset by the impact of a significant depreciation in the Argentine Peso as compared to the same period in 2013.  Case growth increased by 1,458 or 12.2% during the nine month period.  The trend toward more clinically-advanced treatments, which require more time to complete, continued during the nine month period with an increase in the number of higher-revenue IMRT/IGRT treatments and 3D treatments versus 2D treatments as compared to the same period in 2013.

 

Facility gross profit increased $2.0 million, or 5.4% from $37.2 million to $39.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.  Facility-level gross profit as a percentage of total revenues remained at 55.0%. Increases in medical supplies, facility rent, incremental depreciation expense relating to our continued growth and investment in Latin America, expenses related to two centers which are anticipated to open later in 2014, as well as local inflation was offset by a decrease in salaries and benefits and physician compensation.

 

41



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents summaries of our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

(in thousands):

 

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014

 

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue

 

$

238,403

 

92.5

%

$

178,655

 

98.7

%

Management fees

 

16,762

 

6.5

 

 

 

Other revenue

 

2,453

 

1.0

 

2,385

 

1.3

 

Total revenues

 

257,618

 

100.0

 

181,040

 

100.0

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

134,599

 

52.2

 

98,032

 

54.1

 

Medical supplies

 

24,771

 

9.6

 

15,917

 

8.8

 

Facility rent expenses

 

14,867

 

5.8

 

11,427

 

6.3

 

Other operating expenses

 

15,558

 

6.0

 

11,882

 

6.6

 

General and administrative expenses

 

37,811

 

14.7

 

24,936

 

13.8

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

22,388

 

8.7

 

16,059

 

8.9

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

5,621

 

2.2

 

3,767

 

2.1

 

Interest expense, net

 

30,233

 

11.7

 

21,952

 

12.1

 

Impairment loss

 

47,526

 

18.4

 

 

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

8,558

 

3.3

 

 

 

Equity initial public offering expenses

 

742

 

0.3

 

 

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

209

 

0.1

 

 

 

Loss on foreign currency transactions

 

210

 

0.1

 

364

 

0.2

 

Loss (gain) on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

 

 

67

 

 

Total expenses

 

343,093

 

133.1

 

204,403

 

112.9

 

Loss before income taxes

 

(85,475

)

(33.1

)

(23,363

)

(12.9

)

Income tax expense

 

1,173

 

0.5

 

1,699

 

0.9

 

Net loss

 

(86,648

)

(33.6

)

(25,062

)

(13.8

)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests — redeemable and non-redeemable

 

(729

)

(0.3

)

(347

)

(0.2

)

Net loss attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(87,377

)

(33.9

)%

$

(25,409

)

(14.0

)%

 

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

 

Revenues

 

Net patient service revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, net patient service revenue comprised 92.5% and 98.7%, respectively, of our total revenues.  In our net patient service revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, revenue from the professional-only component of radiation therapy where we do not bill globally and revenue from the practices of medical specialties other than radiation oncology, comprised approximately 30.3% and 30.0%, respectively, of our total revenues.

 

Management fees. Certain of the Company’s physician groups receive payments for their services and treatments rendered to patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid, third-party payors and self-pay.  Management fees are recorded at the amount earned by the Company under the management services agreements. Services rendered by the respective physician groups are billed by the Company, as the exclusive billing agent of the physician groups, to patients, third-party payors, and others. The Company’s management fees are dependent on the EBITDA (or in one case, revenue) of each treatment center. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, management fees comprised 6.5% of our total revenues. These management fees are as a result of the OnCure transaction, which closed on October 25, 2013.

 

Other revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, other revenue comprised approximately 1.0% and 1.3%, respectively, of our total revenues. Other revenue is primarily derived from management services provided to hospital radiation therapy departments, technical services provided to hospital radiation therapy departments, billing services provided to non-affiliated physicians, gain and losses from sale/disposal of medical equipment, equity interest in net earnings/losses of unconsolidated joint ventures and income for equipment leased by joint venture entities.

 

Total revenues. Total revenues increased by $76.6 million, or 42.3%, from $181.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $257.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Total revenue was positively impacted by $71.2 million due to our expansion into new practices and treatments centers in new and existing local markets during 2013 and 2014 through the acquisition of several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisition of physician radiation practices in Argentina, California, Guatemala, Florida, Indiana, North Carolina, Mexico and the opening of two de novo centers as follows:

 

42



Table of Contents

 

Date

 

Sites

 

Location

 

Market

 

Type

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 2013

 

1

 

Latin America

 

International (Mexico)

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 2013

 

1

 

Latin America

 

International (Argentina)

 

De Novo (Hospital Campus)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 2013

 

30

 

California / Indiana / Florida

 

California / Indiana / Florida

 

Acquisition - OnCure Freestanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 2013

 

3

 

Indiana

 

Indiana

 

Acquisition - OnCure professional / other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 2013

 

1

 

Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina

 

Eastern North Carolina

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 2014

 

1

 

Guatemala

 

International (Guatemala)

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2014

 

17

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach/ Broward counties — Florida

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach/ Broward counties — Florida

 

Acquisition - SFRO Freestanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2014

 

4

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach counties — Florida

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach counties — Florida

 

Acquisition - SFRO professional / other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2014

 

1

 

Westchester/Bronx/Long Island — New York

 

Westchester/Bronx/Long Island — New York

 

De Novo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 2014

 

1

 

Latin America

 

International (Argentina)

 

Acquisition

 

Revenue in our existing local markets and practices increased by approximately $5.4 million.

 

Expenses

 

Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits increased by $36.6 million, or 37.3%, from $98.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $134.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Salaries and benefits as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 54.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to 52.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  Additional staffing of personnel and physicians due to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014 contributed $34.0 million to our salaries and benefits. In December 2013, we implemented a new equity-incentive plan, which decreased stock compensation by approximately $0.1 million in 2014. For existing practices and centers within our local markets, salaries and benefits increased $2.7 million due to increases in severance payments for terminated employees due to a reduction in workforce and incurred severance payments to certain executives.

 

Medical supplies. Medical supplies increased by $8.9 million, or 55.6%, from $15.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $24.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Medical supplies as a percentage of total revenues increased from 8.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to 9.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Medical supplies consist of patient positioning devices, radioactive seed supplies, supplies used for other brachytherapy services, pharmaceuticals used in the delivery of radiation therapy treatments and chemotherapy-related drugs and other medical supplies. Approximately $6.5 million of the increase was related to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. In our remaining practices and centers in existing local markets, medical supplies increased by approximately $2.4 million. These pharmaceuticals and chemotherapy medical supplies are principally reimbursable by third-party payers.

 

Facility rent expenses. Facility rent expenses increased by $3.5 million, or 30.1%, from $11.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $14.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Facility rent expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 6.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to 5.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Facility rent expenses consist of rent expense associated with our treatment center locations.  Approximately $3.7 million of the increase was related to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. Facility rent expense in our remaining practices and centers in existing local markets decreased by approximately $0.2 million.

 

43



Table of Contents

 

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses increased by $3.7 million or 30.9%, from $11.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $15.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  Other operating expense as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 6.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to 6.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  Other operating expenses consist of repairs and maintenance of equipment, equipment rental and contract labor. Approximately $4.8 million of the increase was related to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. Approximately $0.1 million increase relates to equipment rental expense relating to medical equipment refinancing, offset by a decrease of approximately $1.2 million in our remaining practices and centers in existing local markets.

 

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $12.9 million or 51.6%, from $24.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $37.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. General and administrative expenses principally consist of professional service fees, consulting, office supplies and expenses, insurance, marketing and travel costs. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased from 13.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to 14.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  The net increase of $12.9 million in general and administrative expenses was due to an increase of approximately $4.6 million relating to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. In addition, there was an increase of approximately $0.7 million in litigation settlements with certain physicians and legal and consulting costs associated with the Medicare diagnostic matter, $9.3 million related to expenses associated with note-holder negotiations and management of liquidity and an increase of approximately $0.8 million in our remaining practices and treatments centers in our existing local markets offset by decreases in $0.2 million related to expenses for consulting services for the CMS 2014 fee schedule, $2.0 million in diligence costs relating to acquisitions and potential acquisitions of physician practices, $0.3 million relating to our rebranding initiatives.

 

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $6.3 million or 39.4%, from $16.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $22.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 8.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to 8.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  The change in depreciation and amortization was due to an increase of approximately $7.1 million relating to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. An increase in capital expenditures related to our investment in advanced radiation treatment technologies and software maintenance in certain local markets increased our depreciation and amortization by approximately $0.2 million offset by a decrease of approximately $1.0 million in amortization of certain non-compete agreements.

 

44



Table of Contents

 

Provision for doubtful accounts. The provision for doubtful accounts increased by $1.8 million, or 49.2%, from $3.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $5.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  The provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of total revenues increased from 2.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to 2.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2014 we continue to make progress in improving the overall collection process, including centralization of the prior authorization process, with standardization process supporting peer to peer justification of medical necessity, improvements in payment posting timeliness, electronic submission of documentation to Medicare carriers, Medicaid eligibility retro scrubbing of self pay patients, automated insurance rebilling, focused escalation process for claims in Medical Review with insurers, collector productivity and quality tracking and monitoring, and improved processes at the treatment centers to collect co-pay amounts at the time of service.

 

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, increased by $8.2 million, or 37.7%, from $22.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $30.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is primarily attributable to additional debt obligations predominately relating to our senior credit facility.  As of September 30, 2014, we had approximately $90.0 million outstanding in our Term Facility and $-0- million outstanding in our Revolver Credit Facility. The increase is also attributable to recent acquisitions. Pursuant to the SFRO acquisition, we entered into the SFRO Credit Agreement which provides for a $60 million Term B Loan, $7.9 million Term A Loan, and assumed capital lease obligations. The OnCure transaction included the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and additional capital lease financing.  As further described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, a portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repay all obligations under the South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans, repay certain other debt and capital leases, as well as provide capital for near-term strategic initiatives and general corporate purposes.

 

Impairment loss. As we began to experience some liquidity issues after terminating our previously planned initial public offering, we began to have discussions with an ad hoc group of holders of our outstanding notes.  On July 29, 2014, we entered into a Recapitalization Support Agreement. The Recapitalization Support Agreement set forth the terms through which we expected to either (a) obtain additional liquidity through an equity contribution or subordinated debt incurred in a minimum amount of $150 million on or before October 1, 2014 (the “Capital Contribution”) or (b) consummate a Recapitalization consistent with the material terms and conditions described in the Recapitalization Term Sheet attached to the Recapitalization Support Agreement.

 

On September 26, 2014, we entered into the Subscription Agreement with CPPIB, pursuant to which we issued the Series A Preferred stock for a purchase price of approximately $325.0 million.  The receipt of these funds satisfied the requirement under the Recapitalization Support Agreement that the Company receive a Capital Contribution.

 

We performed an interim impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We completed the first step of the impairment test as of June 30, 2014 and determined that the carrying amount of one of the reporting units exceeded its estimated implied fair value, thereby requiring performance of the second step of the impairment test to calculate the amount of the impairment. In accordance with ASC 350, we recorded a preliminary estimated non-cash impairment loss of approximately $182 million in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. We completed the second step of the impairment test and recorded an impairment loss of approximately $46.3 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

 

In addition to the goodwill impairment losses noted above, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $1.2 million during the third quarter of 2014 related to the write-off of our 33.6% investment interest in a development stage proton therapy center located in New York (“NY Proton”). As a result of NY Proton’s continued operating losses since its inception in 2010 and our liquidity issues experienced during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we provided notice to the consortium that we may not be able to provide the full commitment of approximately $10.0 million to this project. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement entered into with CPPIB on September 26, 2014, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to transfer and sell our ownership interest to the consortium or to a third party and transfer the general manager role and any future management services fees to the consortium or a third party.

 

Equity initial public offering expenses. We determined due to market conditions to postpone the initial public offering of our equity securities.  As a result of the postponement and entering into the Recapitalization Support Agreement with Consenting Subordinated Noteholders, we wrote-off approximately $0.7 million in additional expenses associated with the initial public offering during the quarter.

 

Early extinguishment of debt. We incurred approximately $8.6 million from the early extinguishment of debt as a result of the prepayment of the Term Loan A and B Facilities, MDLLC Credit Agreement, Purchase Money Note Purchase Agreement, and certain capital leases, which included the write-offs of $2.0 million in deferred financing costs, $2.7 million in original issue discount costs, and $3.8 million in pre-payment penalties, including $0.3 million paid to Theriac Management Investments, LLC (a related party real estate entity owned by certain of the Company’s directors and officers) pursuant to the Purchase Money Note Agreement.

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability.  On October 25, 2013, we completed the acquisition of OnCure. The transaction was funded through a combination of cash on hand, borrowings from our senior secured credit facility and the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes of OnCure, which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and mature January 15, 2017, of which $7.5 million included in other long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, is subject to escrow arrangements and will be released to holders upon

 

45



Table of Contents

 

satisfaction of certain conditions (the “earn out payment”).  The Company recorded an estimated earn out payment at the time of the closing of the transaction. The earn out payment is contingent upon certain acquired centers attaining earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization targets, is due on December 31, 2015, and is payable through the issuance of the 11.75% senior secured notes.  At September 30, 2014, we estimated the fair value of the contingent earn out liability and increased the liability due to the seller by approximately $0.2 million. We recorded the $0.2 million to expense in the fair value adjustment caption in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

Income taxes.  Our effective tax rate was (1.4)% for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and (7.3)% for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The change in the effective rate for the third quarter of 2014 compared to the same period of the year prior is primarily the result of the recording of an impairment against goodwill of the domestic operations, the release of previously recorded reserves related to state tax issues, the relative mix of earnings and tax rates across jurisdictions, and the application of ASC 740-270 to exclude certain jurisdictions for which we are unable to benefit from losses.  As a result, on an absolute dollar basis, the expense for income taxes changed by $0.5 million from the income tax expense of $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to an income tax expense of $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

 

Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof.  We monitor the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and make adjustments, if required, throughout the year.  If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating our annual effective tax rates, future income tax expense (benefit) could be materially affected.

 

In addition, we are periodically under audit by federal, state, or local authorities in the areas of income taxes and other taxes. These audits include questioning the timing and amount of deductions and compliance with federal, state, and local tax laws. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes from these audits to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.  To the extent we prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, the effective tax rate could be materially affected.

 

Net loss. Net loss increased by $61.6 million, from $25.1 million in net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $86.6 million net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  Net loss represents 13.8% of total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 33.7% of total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

 

46



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents summaries of our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

(in thousands):

 

September 30, 2014

 

September 30, 2013

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net patient service revenue

 

$

698,261

 

92.3

%

$

526,475

 

98.8

%

Management fees

 

50,215

 

6.6

 

 

 

Other revenue

 

8,437

 

1.1

 

6,651

 

1.2

 

Total revenues

 

756,913

 

100.0

 

533,126

 

100.0

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

396,311

 

52.4

 

293,972

 

55.1

 

Medical supplies

 

71,007

 

9.4

 

46,166

 

8.7

 

Facility rent expenses

 

47,529

 

6.3

 

32,285

 

6.1

 

Other operating expenses

 

46,035

 

6.1

 

33,155

 

6.2

 

General and administrative expenses

 

101,985

 

13.5

 

68,832

 

12.9

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

65,272

 

8.6

 

46,550

 

8.7

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

13,345

 

1.8

 

8,857

 

1.7

 

Interest expense, net

 

87,659

 

11.6

 

62,369

 

11.7

 

Impairment loss

 

229,526

 

30.3

 

 

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

8,558

 

1.1

 

 

 

Equity initial public offering expenses

 

4,905

 

0.6

 

 

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction

 

135

 

 

 

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability

 

612

 

0.1

 

 

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture

 

 

 

(1,460

)

(0.3

)

Loss on foreign currency transactions

 

317

 

 

1,166

 

0.2

 

Loss (gain) on foreign currency derivative contracts

 

(4

)

 

309

 

0.1

 

Total expenses

 

1,073,192

 

141.8

 

592,201

 

111.1

 

Loss before income taxes

 

(316,279

)

(41.8

)

(59,075

)

(11.1

)

Income tax expense

 

4,213

 

0.6

 

4,849

 

0.9

 

Net loss

 

(320,492

)

(42.4

)

(63,924

)

(12.0

)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests — redeemable and non-redeemable

 

(4,590

)

(0.6

)

(1,365

)

(0.3

)

Net loss attributable to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. shareholder

 

$

(325,082

)

(43.0

)%

$

(65,289

)

(12.3

)%

 

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013

 

Revenues

 

Net patient service revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, net patient service revenue comprised 92.3% and 98.8%, respectively, of our total revenues.  In our net patient service revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, revenue from the professional-only component of radiation therapy where we do not bill globally and revenue from the practices of medical specialties other than radiation oncology, comprised approximately 30.5% and 30.0%, respectively, of our total revenues.

 

Management fees. Certain of the Company’s physician groups receive payments for their services and treatments rendered to patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid, third-party payors and self-pay.  Management fees are recorded at the amount earned by the Company under the management services agreements. Services rendered by the respective physician groups are billed by the Company, as the exclusive billing agent of the physician groups, to patients, third-party payors, and others. The Company’s management fees are dependent on the EBITDA (or in one case, revenue) of each treatment center. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, management fees comprised 6.6% of our total revenues. These management fees are as a result of the OnCure transaction, which closed on October 25, 2013.

 

Other revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, other revenue comprised approximately 1.1% and 1.2%, respectively, of our total revenues. Other revenue is primarily derived from management services provided to hospital radiation therapy departments, technical services provided to hospital radiation therapy departments, billing services provided to non-affiliated physicians, gain and losses from sale/disposal of medical equipment, equity interest in net earnings/losses of unconsolidated joint ventures and income for equipment leased by joint venture entities.

 

Total revenues. Total revenues increased by $223.8 million, or 42.0%, from $533.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $756.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Total revenue was positively impacted by $212.1 million due to our expansion into new practices and treatments centers in new and existing local markets during 2013 and 2014 through the acquisition of several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisition of physician radiation practices in Argentina, Arizona, California, Guatemala, Florida, Indiana, North Carolina, Mexico and the opening of two de novo centers as follows:

 

47



Table of Contents

 

Date

 

Sites

 

Location

 

Market

 

Type

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 2013

 

3

 

Cape Coral / Ft. Myers / Bonita Springs — Florida

 

Lee County — Florida

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 2013

 

2

 

Naples — Florida

 

Collier County — Florida

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 2013

 

1

 

Casa Grande - Arizona

 

Central Arizona

 

Joint Venture Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 2013

 

1

 

Latin America

 

International (Mexico)

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 2013

 

1

 

Latin America

 

International (Argentina)

 

De Novo (Hospital Campus)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 2013

 

30

 

California / Indiana / Florida

 

California / Indiana / Florida

 

Acquisition - OnCure Freestanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 2013

 

3

 

Indiana

 

Indiana

 

Acquisition - OnCure professional / other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 2013

 

1

 

Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina

 

Eastern North Carolina

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 2014

 

1

 

Guatemala

 

International (Guatemala)

 

Acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2014

 

17

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach/ Broward counties — Florida

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach/ Broward counties — Florida

 

Acquisition - SFRO Freestanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2014

 

4

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach counties — Florida

 

Miami/Dade/Palm Beach counties — Florida

 

Acquisition - SFRO professional / other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 2014

 

1

 

Westchester/Bronx/Long Island — New York

 

Westchester/Bronx/Long Island — New York

 

De Novo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 2014

 

1

 

Latin America

 

International (Argentina)

 

Acquisition

 

Revenue from CMS for the 2014 PQRI program increased approximately $0.1 million and revenues in our existing local markets and practices increased by approximately $11.5 million.

 

Expenses

 

Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits increased by $102.3 million, or 34.8%, from $294.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $396.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Salaries and benefits as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 55.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 52.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  Additional staffing of personnel and physicians due to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014 contributed $96.8 million to our salaries and benefits. In December 2013, we implemented a new equity-incentive plan, which decreased stock compensation by approximately $0.4 million in 2014. For existing practices and centers within our local markets, salaries and benefits increased $5.9 million due to increased salaries related to our physician liaison program and the expansion of our senior management team and increases in severance payments for terminated employees due to a reduction in workforce and incurred severance payments to certain executives offset by decreases in our compensation arrangements with certain radiation oncologists.

 

Medical supplies. Medical supplies increased by $24.8 million, or 53.8%, from $46.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $71.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Medical supplies as a percentage of total revenues increased from 8.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 9.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Medical supplies consist of patient positioning devices, radioactive seed supplies, supplies used for other brachytherapy services, pharmaceuticals used in the delivery of radiation therapy treatments and chemotherapy-related drugs and other medical supplies. Approximately $21.8 million of the increase was related to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. In our remaining practices and centers in existing local markets, medical supplies increased by approximately $3.0 million. These pharmaceuticals and chemotherapy medical supplies are principally reimbursable by third-party payers.

 

Facility rent expenses. Facility rent expenses increased by $15.2 million, or 47.2%, from $32.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $47.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Facility rent expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased from 6.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 6.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Facility rent expenses consist of rent expense associated with our treatment center locations.  Approximately $15.3 million of the increase was related to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. Facility rent expense in our remaining practices and centers in existing local markets decreased by approximately $0.1 million.

 

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses increased by $12.8 million or 38.8%, from $33.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $46.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  Other operating expense as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 6.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 6.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  Other operating expenses consist of repairs and maintenance of equipment, equipment rental and contract labor. Approximately $13.0 million of the increase was related to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey,

 

48



Table of Contents

 

New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. Approximately $0.4 million increase relates to equipment rental expense relating to medical equipment refinancing, offset by a decrease of approximately $0.6 million in our remaining practices and centers in existing local markets.

 

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $33.2 million or 48.2%, from $68.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $102.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. General and administrative expenses principally consist of professional service fees, consulting, office supplies and expenses, insurance, marketing and travel costs. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased from 12.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 13.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The net increase of $33.2 million in general and administrative expenses was due to an increase of approximately $14.4 million relating to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. In addition there was an increase of approximately $2.6 million in litigation settlements with certain physicians and legal and consulting costs associated with the Medicare diagnostic matter, $9.3 million related to expenses associated with note-holder negotiations and management of liquidity, $0.5 million related to expenses for consulting services for the CMS 2014 fee schedule, $2.7 million in diligence costs relating to acquisitions and potential acquisitions of physician practices, and an increase of approximately $3.7 million in our remaining practices and treatments centers in our existing local markets.

 

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $18.7 million or 40.2%, from $46.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $65.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 8.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 8.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The change in depreciation and amortization was due to an increase of approximately $19.8 million relating to our development and expansion in several urology, medical oncology and surgery practices in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Rhode Island and the acquisitions of treatment centers in new and existing local markets during the latter part of 2013 and 2014. An increase in capital expenditures related to our investment in advanced radiation treatment technologies and software maintenance in certain local markets increased our depreciation and amortization by approximately $1.3 million offset by a decrease of approximately $2.4 million in amortization of certain non-compete agreements.

 

Provision for doubtful accounts. The provision for doubtful accounts increased by $4.4 million, or 50.7%, from $8.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $13.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of total revenues increased from 1.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 1.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. As a result of our recent acquisitions, we continue to make progress in improving the overall collection process, including centralization of the prior authorization process, with standardization process supporting peer to peer justification of medical necessity, improvements in payment posting timeliness, electronic submission of documentation to Medicare carriers, Medicaid eligibility retro scrubbing of self pay patients, automated insurance rebilling, focused escalation process for claims in Medical Review with insurers, collector productivity and quality tracking and monitoring, and improved processes at the treatment centers to collect co-pay amounts at the time of service.

 

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, increased by $25.3 million, or 40.5%, from $62.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $87.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is primarily attributable to additional debt obligations predominately relating to our senior credit facility.  As of September 30, 2014, we had approximately $90.0 million outstanding in our Term Facility and $-0- million outstanding in our Revolver Credit Facility. The increase is also attributable to recent acquisitions. Pursuant to the SFRO acquisition we entered into the SFRO Credit Agreement which provides for a $60 million Term B Loan, $7.9 million Term A Loan, and assumed capital lease obligations. The OnCure transaction included the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and additional capital lease financing. As further described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, a portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repay all obligations under the South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans, repay certain other debt and capital leases, as well as provide capital for near-term strategic initiatives and general corporate purposes.

 

Impairment loss. As we began to experience some liquidity issues after terminating our previously planned initial public offering, we began to have discussions with an ad hoc group of holders of our outstanding notes.  On July 29, 2014, we entered into a Recapitalization Support Agreement. The Recapitalization Support Agreement set forth the terms through which we expected to either (a) obtain additional liquidity through an equity contribution or subordinated debt incurred in a minimum amount of $150 million on or before October 1, 2014 or (b) consummate a Recapitalization consistent with the material terms and conditions described in the Recapitalization Term Sheet attached to the Recapitalization Support Agreement.

 

On September 26, 2014, we entered into the Subscription Agreement with CPPIB, pursuant to which we issued the Series A Preferred stock for a purchase price of approximately $325.0 million.  The receipt of these funds satisfied the requirement under the Recapitalization Support Agreement that the Company receive a Capital Contribution.

 

We performed an interim impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We completed the first step of the impairment test as of June 30, 2014 and determined that the carrying amount of one of the reporting units exceeded its estimated implied fair value, thereby requiring performance of the second step of the impairment test to calculate the amount of the impairment. In accordance with ASC 350, we recorded a preliminary estimated non-cash impairment loss of approximately $182 million in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. We completed the second step of the impairment test and recorded an impairment loss of approximately $46.3 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

 

In addition to the goodwill impairment losses noted above, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $1.2 million during the third quarter of 2014 related to the write-off of our 33.6% investment interest in a development stage proton therapy center located in New York. As a result of NY Proton’s continued operating losses since its inception in 2010 and our liquidity issues experienced during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we provided notice to the consortium that we may not be able to provide the full commitment of approximately $10.0 million to this project. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement entered into with CPPIB on September 26, 2014, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to transfer and sell our ownership interest to the consortium or to a third party and transfer the general manager role and any future management services fees to the consortium or a third party.

 

49



Table of Contents

 

Early extinguishment of debt. We incurred approximately $8.6 million from the early extinguishment of debt as a result of the prepayment of the Term Loan A and B Facilities, MDLLC Credit Agreement, Purchase Money Note Purchase Agreement, and certain capital leases, which included the write-offs of $2.0 million in deferred financing costs, $2.7 million in original issue discount costs, and $3.8 million in pre-payment penalties, including $0.3 million paid to Theriac Management Investments, LLC (a related party real estate entity owned by certain of the Company’s directors and officers) pursuant to the Purchase Money Note Agreement..

 

Equity initial public offering expenses. In May, 2014, we determined due to market conditions to postpone the initial public offering of our equity securities.  As a result of the postponement and entering into the Recapitalization Support Agreement with Consenting Subordinated Noteholders, we wrote-off approximately $4.9 million in expenses associated with the initial public offering.

 

Loss on sale leaseback transaction. In March 2014, the Company entered into a sale leaseback transaction with a financial institution.  The sale leaseback transaction related to medical equipment.  Proceeds from the sale were approximately $5.7 million.  The Company recorded a loss on the sale leaseback transaction of approximately $0.1 million.

 

Fair value adjustment of earn-out liability.  On October 25, 2013, we completed the acquisition of OnCure. The transaction was funded through a combination of cash on hand, borrowings from our senior secured credit facility and the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes of OnCure, which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and mature January 15, 2017, of which $7.5 million included in other long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, is subject to escrow arrangements and will be released to holders upon satisfaction of certain conditions (the “earn out payment”).  The Company recorded an estimated earn out payment at the time of the closing of the transaction. The earn out payment is contingent upon certain acquired centers attaining earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization targets, is due on December 31, 2015, and is payable through the issuance of the 11.75% senior secured notes.  At September 30, 2014, we estimated the fair value of the contingent earn out liability and increased the liability due to the seller by approximately $0.6 million. We recorded the $0.6 million to expense in the fair value adjustment caption in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

Gain on the sale of an interest in a joint venture.  In June 2013, we sold our 45% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture which operated a radiation treatment center in Providence, Rhode Island in partnership with a hospital to provide stereotactic radio-surgery through the use of a cyberknife for approximately $1.5 million, and recorded a respective gain on the sale.

 

Income taxes.  Our effective tax rate was (1.3)% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and (8.2)% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The change in the effective rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period of the year prior is primarily the result of recording of an impairment against goodwill of the domestic operations during the second and third quarters of 2014, the release of previously recorded reserves related to US federal and state tax issues, the relative mix of earnings and tax rates across jurisdictions, and the application of ASC 740-270 to exclude certain jurisdictions for which we are unable to benefit from losses.  As a result, on an absolute dollar basis, the expense for income taxes changed by $0.6 million from the income tax expense of $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to an income tax expense of $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

 

Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof.  We monitor the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and make adjustments, if required, throughout the year.  If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating our annual effective tax rates, future income tax expense (benefit) could be materially affected.

 

In addition, we are periodically under audit by federal, state, or local authorities in the areas of income taxes and other taxes. These audits include questioning the timing and amount of deductions and compliance with federal, state, and local tax laws. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes from these audits to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.  To the extent we prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, the effective tax rate could be materially affected.

 

Net loss. Net loss increased by $256.6 million, from $63.9 million in net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $320.5 million net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  Net loss represents 12.0% of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 42.4% of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

 

50



Table of Contents

 

Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations

 

Our results of operations historically have fluctuated on a quarterly basis and can be expected to continue to fluctuate. Many of the patients of our Florida treatment centers are part-time residents in Florida during the winter months. Hence, these treatment centers have historically experienced higher utilization rates during the winter months than during the remainder of the year. In addition, volume is typically lower in the summer months due to traditional vacation periods.  60 of our 178 radiation treatment centers are located in Florida.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We are highly leveraged. As of September 30, 2014, we had $1.0 billion of long-term debt outstanding. We have experienced and continue to experience losses from operations. We reported a net loss of approximately $78.2 million, $151.1 million, and $349.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and $320.5 million and $63.9 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Our high level of debt could have material adverse effects on our business and financial condition. Specifically, our high level of debt could have important consequences, including the following:

 

·    making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to debt;

 

·    limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements;

 

·    requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes;

 

·    increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

 

·    limiting our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete;

 

·    placing the us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors; and

 

·    increasing our cost of borrowing.

 

Our ability to make scheduled payments and to refinance our indebtedness depends on, and is subject to, our financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors beyond our control, including the availability of financing in the international banking and capital markets.

 

We are involved in disputes, litigation, and regulatory matters incidental to our operations, including governmental investigations and other matters arising out of the normal conduct of business.  The resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial position.

 

On July 29, 2014, we, and each of our direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into a Recapitalization Support Agreement. The Recapitalization Support Agreement set forth the terms through which we expected to either (a) obtain additional liquidity through an equity contribution or subordinated debt incurred in a minimum amount of $150 million on or before October 1, 2014 or (b) consummate a recapitalization consistent with the material terms and conditions described in the term sheet attached to the Recapitalization Support Agreement.

 

On September 26, 2014, we issued to CPPIB, in a private placement, an aggregate of 385,000 newly issued shares of its Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $325.0 million.

 

This equity investment provides us with substantial incremental liquidity, significantly reduces our debt, and provides the necessary long-term capital to continue to grow our business.  As further described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, a portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repay all obligations under the South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans, repay certain other debt and capital leases, as well as provide capital for near-term strategic initiatives and general corporate purposes.  As a result of this investment, the Recapitalization Support Agreement that we entered into in July was terminated in accordance with its terms, and our senior subordinated notes will remain outstanding and unmodified.

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2014 was $2.6 million and $11.7 million, respectively.

 

Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $9.1 million from $2.6 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 to $11.7 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 predominately due to management of our vendor payables and increased cash flow related to our OnCure and SFRO transactions.  As of September 30, 2014, we had approximately $90.0 million outstanding in our Term Facility and $-0- million outstanding in our Revolver Credit Facility. In June 2014, we recorded a preliminary impairment loss of approximately $182.0 million as a result of us experiencing some liquidity issues after terminating our previously planned initial public offering.  We finalized our goodwill impairment for step two of the process as of September 30, 2014 and recorded an additional $46.3 million in goodwill impairment and $1.2 million in impairment related to our write-off of our 33.6% investment interest in a development stage proton therapy center located in New York (“NY Proton”). As a result of NY Proton’s continued operating losses since its inception in 2010 and our liquidity issues experienced during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we provided notice to the consortium that we may not be able to provide the full commitment of approximately $10.0 million to this project. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement entered into with CPPIB on September 26, 2014, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to transfer and sell our ownership interest to the consortium or to a third party and transfer the general manager role and any future management services fees to the consortium or a third party.

 

Cash at September 30, 2014 held by our foreign subsidiaries was $5.6 million.  We consider these cash flows to be permanently invested in our foreign subsidiaries and therefore do not anticipate repatriating any excess cash flows to the U.S.  We believe that the magnitude of our growth opportunities outside of the U.S. will cause us to continuously reinvest foreign earnings. We do not require access to the earnings and cash flow of our international subsidiaries to fund our U.S. operations.

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2014 was $56.6 million and $100.3 million, respectively.

 

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $43.7 million from $56.6 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 to $100.3 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014.  In 2014, net cash used in investing activities was impacted by approximately $50.1 million in the acquisition of medical practices. On January 13, 2014, CarePoint purchased the membership interest in Quantum Care, LLC for approximately $1.9 million. On January 15, 2014, we purchased 69% interest in a legal entity that operates a radiation oncology facility in Guatemala City, Guatemala for approximately $0.9 million plus the assumption of approximately $3.1 million in debt. On February 10, 2014, we purchased a 65% equity interest in South Florida Radiation Oncology (“SFRO”) for approximately $55.4 million, subject to working capital and other customary adjustments. The transaction was primarily funded with the proceeds of a new $60 million term loan facility that accrues interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin of 10.50% per annum and matures on January 15, 2017 and $7.9 million of term loans to refinance existing SFRO debt. In addition, we reflected approximately $11.7 million in restricted cash relating to the SFRO existing debt and an indemnity escrow for the determination of the final purchase price.  On March 26, 2014 we purchased 75% interest in a legal entity that operates a radiation oncology facility in Villa Maria, Argentina for approximately $0.5 million. During 2014, we acquired the assets of several physician practices in Florida for approximately $0.3 million. During 2014, we purchased approximately $44.3 million in property and

 

51



Table of Contents

 

equipment. We have one of the most technically-advanced radiation equipment platforms in the industry. A significant portion of this spend is for growth related projects.  This includes the upgrade of technology and equipment at the legacy OnCure centers to expand capacity as well as add SRS capacity, and Medical Developers’ growth.

 

In 2013, net cash used in investing activities was impacted by approximately $0.1 million in cash paid for the assets of several physician practices in Arizona, New Jersey and North Carolina, and approximately $17.7 million in cash paid for the assets of five radiation oncology practices and a urology group located in Lee and Collier Counties in Southwest Florida in May 2013. In June 2013, we contributed our Casa Grande, Arizona radiation physician practice and approximately $5.0 million to purchase a 55.0% interest in a joint venture. In June 2013, we funded an initial deposit of approximately $5.0 million into an escrow account for the initial deposit for the purchase of medical practices and is reflected as restricted cash on our balance sheet. In 2013, net cash used in investing activities was impacted by approximately $0.5 million in contribution of capital to an unconsolidated joint venture. In June 2013, we sold our 45% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture which operated a radiation treatment center in Providence, Rhode Island for approximately $1.5 million. In July 2013, we purchased the remaining 38.0% interest in a joint venture radiation facility, located in Woonsocket, Rhode Island from a hospital partner for approximately $1.5 million. In July 2013 we purchased a company that operates a radiation treatment center in Tijuana, Mexico for approximately $1.6 million. During 2013, we entered into foreign exchange option contracts expiring on June 2014 to convert a significant portion of our forecasted foreign currency denominated net income into U.S. dollars to limit the adverse impact of a weakening Argentine Peso against the U.S. dollar. The cost of the option contracts, were approximately $0.2 million.

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

 

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 and 2014 was $71.1 million and $232.0 million, respectively.

 

In January 2014, we sold a 20% share of our Southern New England Regional Cancer Care joint venture each to Care New England Health System (“CNE”) and Roger Williams Medical Center.  Also during the quarter, CNE acquired a 20% interest in our Roger Williams Medical Center joint venture. We received payments of approximately $1.3 million from the issuance of noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures.

 

On February 10, 2014, 21C East Florida and South Florida Radiation Oncology Coconut Creek, LLC (“Coconut Creek”), a subsidiary of SFRO, as borrowers (the “Borrowers”), the several lenders and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC as administrative agent and collateral agent entered into a new credit agreement (the “SFRO Credit Agreement”).  The SFRO Credit Agreement provides for a $60 million Term B Loan in favor of 21C East Florida (“Term B Loan”) and $7.9 million Term A Loan in favor of Coconut Creek issued for purposes of refinancing existing SFRO debt (“Term A Loan” and together with the Term B Loan, the “SFRO Term Loans”).  The SFRO Term Loans each have a maturity date of January 15, 2017.  We incurred approximately $1.0 million in deferred financing costs relating to the SFRO debt.

 

On October 25, 2013, we completed the acquisition of OnCure. The transaction included the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes of OnCure, which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and mature January 15, 2017, of which $7.5 million is subject to escrow arrangements and will be released to holders upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Interest is payable on the Secured Notes on each January 15 and July 15, commencing July 15, 2014.

 

On August 28, 2013, we entered into an Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) to the credit agreement among us, 21st Century Oncology, Inc. (“21C”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, the Administrative Agent named therein and the other agents and arrangers named therein, dated as of May 10, 2012 (the “Original Credit Agreement” and, as amended and restated by the Amendment Agreement, the “Credit Agreement”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Amendment Agreement, the amendments to the Original Credit Agreement became effective on August 29, 2013.

 

The Credit Agreement provides for credit facilities consisting of (i) a $90 million term loan facility (the “Term Facility”) and (ii) a revolving credit facility provided for up to $100 million of revolving extensions of credit outstanding at any time (including revolving loans, swingline loans and letters of credit) (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and together with the Term Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The Term Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility each have a maturity date of October 15, 2016.

 

As a result of the Amendment Agreement, the proceeds of $87.75 million (net of original issue discount of $2.25 million) from the term loan facility was used to pay down approximately $62.5 million in revolver loans and accrued interest and fees of approximately $0.4 million. We incurred approximately $1.4 million in transaction fees and expenses, including legal, accounting and other fees and expenses in connection with the amendment agreement.

 

On September 26, 2014, we issued to CPPIB, in a private placement, an aggregate of 385,000 newly issued shares of our Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $325.0 million.

 

This equity investment provides us with substantial incremental liquidity, significantly reduces our debt, and provides the necessary long-term capital to continue to grow our business.  As further described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, a portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repay all obligations under the South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans, repay certain other debt and capital leases, as well as provide capital for near-term strategic initiatives and general corporate purposes.  As a result of this investment, the Recapitalization Support Agreement that we entered into in July was terminated in accordance with its terms, and our senior subordinated notes will remain outstanding and unmodified.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we paid approximately $4.2 million in costs associated with the initial public offering costs we incurred of approximately $4.9 million. We had partnership distributions from non-controlling interests of approximately $1.9 million and $2.0 million in 2013 and 2014, respectively.

 

52



Table of Contents

 

Senior Subordinated Notes

 

On April 20, 2010, we consummated a debt offering in an aggregate principal amount of $310.0 million of 97/8% senior subordinated notes due 2017, and repaid our existing $175.0 million in aggregate principal amount 13.5% senior subordinated notes due 2015, including accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $6.4 million and the call premium of approximately $5.3 million.  The remaining proceeds from the Offering were used to pay down $74.8 million of the Term Loan B and $10.0 million of our revolving credit facility.  A portion of the proceeds was placed in a restricted account pending application to finance certain acquisitions, including the acquisitions of a radiation treatment center and physician practices in South Carolina, which were consummated on May 3, 2010.  We incurred approximately $11.9 million in transaction fees and expenses, including legal, accounting and other fees and expenses in connection with the Offering, including the initial purchasers’ discount of $1.9 million.

 

On March 1, 2011, we issued $50 million of  97/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 pursuant to a Commitment Letter from DDJ Capital Management, LLC. The proceeds of $48.5 million were used (i) to fund the MDLLC Acquisition and (ii) to fund transaction costs associated with the MDLLC Acquisition.  We incurred approximately $1.6 million in transaction fees and expenses, including legal, accounting and other fees and expenses in connection with the new notes, and an initial purchasers’ discount of $0.6 million.

 

Senior Secured Second Lien Notes

 

On May 10, 2012, we issued $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8 7/8% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2017 (the “Secured Notes”).

 

The Secured Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated May 10, 2012 (the “Secured Notes Indenture”), the Company, the guarantors signatory thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association. The Secured Notes are senior secured second lien obligations of the Company and are guaranteed on a senior secured second lien basis by the Company, and each of our domestic subsidiaries to the extent such guarantor is a guarantor of the Company’s obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below).

 

The Secured Notes Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability for us, and certain of our subsidiaries to incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock; make other restricted payments; incur liens; redeem debt that is junior in right of payment to the Secured Notes; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries; enter into mergers or consolidations; and enter into transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. In addition, in certain circumstances, if the Company sells assets or experiences certain changes of control, it must offer to purchase the Secured Notes.

 

We used the proceeds to repay our existing senior secured revolving credit facility and the Term Loan B portion of our senior secured credit facilities, which were prepaid in their entirety, cancelled and replaced with the new Revolving Credit Facility described below, and to pay related fees and expenses. Any remaining net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.

 

Senior Secured Notes

 

On October 25, 2013, we completed the acquisition of OnCure. The transaction included the issuance of $82.5 million in senior secured notes of OnCure (the “OnCure Notes”), which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and mature January 15, 2017, of which $7.5 million is subject to escrow arrangements and will be released to holders upon satisfaction of certain conditions. The OnCure Notes were issued pursuant to an Amended and Restated Indenture (the “OnCure Indenture”) of OnCure, with OnCure, as issuer, the subsidiaries of OnCure named therein, as guarantors, the Company, 21C and the subsidiaries of the Company and 21C named therein, as guarantors  and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and collateral agent. The OnCure Notes are senior secured obligations of OnCure and certain of its subsidiaries that guarantee the OnCure Notes and senior unsecured obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries that guarantee the OnCure Notes.

 

The OnCure Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of OnCure, certain of its subsidiaries, the Company, 21C and certain of its subsidiaries to: incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock; make other restricted payments; incur liens; redeem debt that is junior in right of payment to the OnCure Notes; sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries; enter into mergers or consolidations; and enter into transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. In addition, in certain circumstances, if OnCure or the Company sell assets or experience certain changes of control, they must offer to purchase the OnCure Notes.

 

Senior Secured Credit Facility

 

On May 10, 2012, we also entered into the Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) among 21C, as borrower, the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”), collateral agent, issuing bank and as swingline lender, the other agents party thereto and the lenders party thereto. On August 28, 2013, we entered into the Amendment Agreement to the credit agreement among the Company, 21C, the institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, the Administrative Agent named therein and the other agents and arrangers named therein, dated as of May 10, 2012 (the “Original Credit Agreement” and, as amended and restated by the Amendment Agreement, the “Credit Agreement”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Amendment Agreement the amendments to the Original Credit Agreement became effective on August 29, 2013.

 

The Credit Agreement provides for credit facilities consisting of (i) a $90 million term loan facility (the “Term Facility”) and (ii) a revolving credit facility provided for up to $100 million of revolving extensions of credit outstanding at any time (including revolving loans, swingline loans and letters of credit) (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and together with the Term Facility, the “Credit Facilities”).  The Term Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility each have a maturity date of October 15, 2016.

 

Loans under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Facility are subject to the following interest rates:

 

(a) for loans which are Eurodollar loans, for any interest period, at a rate per annum equal to (i) a floating index rate per annum equal to (A) the rate per annum determined on the basis of the rate for deposits in dollars for a period equal to such interest period commencing on the first day of such interest period appearing on Reuters Screen LIBOR01 Page as of 11:00 A.M., London time, two business days prior to the beginning

 

53



Table of Contents

 

of such interest period divided by (B) 1.0 minus the then stated maximum rate of all reserve requirements applicable to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System in respect of liability funding or liabilities as defined in Regulation D (or any successor category of liabilities under Regulation D) (provided that solely with respect to loans under the Term Facility, such floating index rate shall not be less than 1.00% per annum), plus (ii) an applicable margin (A) based upon a total leverage pricing grid for loans under the Revolving Credit Facility or (B) equal to 6.50% per annum for loans under the Term Facility; and

 

(b) for loans which are base rate loans, at a rate per annum equal to (i) a floating index rate per annum equal to the greatest of (A) the Administrative Agent’s prime lending rate at such time, (B) the overnight federal funds rate at such time plus ½ of 1%, and (C) the Eurodollar Rate for a Eurodollar loan with a one-month interest period commencing on such day plus 1.00% (provided that solely with respect to loans under the Term Facility, such floating index rate shall not be less than 2.00% per annum), plus (ii) an applicable margin (A) based upon a total leverage pricing grid for loans under the Revolving Credit Facility or (B) equal to 5.50% per annum for loans under the Term Facility.

 

We will pay certain recurring fees with respect to the Credit Facilities, including (i) fees on the unused commitments of the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility, (ii) letter of credit fees on the aggregate face amounts of outstanding letters of credit and (iii) administration fees.

 

The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, subject to limitations and exceptions, and customary covenants restricting the ability (subject to various exceptions) of 21C and certain of its subsidiaries to:  incur additional indebtedness (including guarantee obligations); incur liens; engage in mergers or other fundamental changes; sell certain property or assets; pay dividends of other distributions; consummate acquisitions; make investments, loans and advances; prepay certain indebtedness, change the nature of their business; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and incur restrictions on the ability of 21C’s subsidiaries to make distributions, advances and asset transfers.  In addition, as of the last business day of each month, 21C will be required to maintain a certain minimum amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus availability under the Revolving Credit Facility of not less than $15.0 million.

 

The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including with respect to nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts; material inaccuracy of a representation or warranty when made; failure to perform or observe covenants; cross default to other material indebtedness; bankruptcy and insolvency events; inability to pay debts; monetary judgment defaults; actual or asserted invalidity or impairment of any definitive loan documentation and a change of control.

 

The obligations of 21C under the Credit Facilities are guaranteed by the Company and certain direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of 21C.

 

The Credit Facilities and certain interest rate protection and other hedging arrangements provided by lenders under the Credit Facilities or its affiliates are secured on a first priority basis by security interests in substantially all of 21C’s and each guarantor’s tangible and intangible assets (subject to certain exceptions).

 

The Revolving Credit Facility requires that we comply with certain financial covenants, including:

 

 

 

Requirement at
September 30,
2014

 

Level at
September 30,
2014

 

Minimum permitted unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus availability under the Revolving Credit Facility

 

>$

15.0 million

 

$

246.7 million

 

 

The Revolving Credit Facility also requires that we comply with various other covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on new indebtedness, asset sales, capital expenditures, acquisitions and dividends, with which we were in compliance as of September 30, 2014.

 

On April 15, 2014, we obtained a waiver of borrowing conditions due to a default of not providing audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 within 90 days after year end. We paid the administrative agent for the account of the Revolving Lenders a fee equal to 0.125% of such Lender’s aggregate Commitments. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility provides for a 30 day cure period for the filing of the audited annual financial statements. The default was cured with the provision of the audited financial statements to the administrative agent on April 30, 2014.

 

Purchase Money Note Purchase Agreement

 

On May 19, 2014, we entered into a Purchase Money Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with Theriac Management Investments, LLC (“Theriac”) (a related party entity owned by certain of the Company’s directors and officers). Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, Theriac loaned to us, pursuant to an unsecured purchase money note, the principal amount of $7.4 million. The Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries of the Company guaranteed the obligations under the note. The note will mature on June 15, 2015 and is subject to an interest rate payable in cash of 10.75% per annum or by adding the amount of such interest to the aggregate principal amount of outstanding notes at the interest rate of 12.0% per annum. The proceeds from the issuance of the note were used to pay for purchases or improvements of property and equipment or to refinance debt incurred to finance such purchases or improvements. A portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the purchase money note purchase agreement on September 26, 2014.

 

MDLLC Credit and Guaranty Agreement

 

On July 28, 2014, Medical Developers, LLC (the “Borrower”), a Florida limited liability company and indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, including the Company entered into a credit and guaranty agreement (the “MDLLC Credit Agreement”).

 

The MDLLC Credit Agreement provided for Tranche A term loans (the “Tranche A Term Loans”) in the aggregate principal amount of $8.5 million and Tranche B term loans (the “Tranche B Term Loans” together with the Tranche A Term Loans, the “Term Loans”) in the aggregate principal amount of $9.0 million, for an aggregate principal amount of Term Loans of $17.5 million, in favor of the Borrower.

 

54



Table of Contents

 

The Term Loans are subject to interest rates, for any interest period, at a rate equal to 14.0% per annum.

 

A portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the MDLLC Credit and Guaranty Agreement on September 26, 2014.

 

Term Loan A and B Facilities

 

On February 10, 2014, 21C East Florida and South Florida Radiation Oncology Coconut Creek, LLC (“Coconut Creek”), a subsidiary of SFRO, as borrowers (the “Borrowers”) entered into a new credit agreement (the “SFRO Credit Agreement”).  The SFRO Credit Agreement provides for a $60 million Term B Loan in favor of 21C East Florida (“Term B Loan”) and $7.9 million Term A Loan in favor of Coconut Creek issued for purposes of refinancing existing SFRO debt (“Term A Loan” and together with the Term B Loan, the “SFRO Term Loans”).  The SFRO Term Loans each have a maturity date of January 15, 2017.

 

On July 22, 2014, 21C East Florida and Coconut Creek entered into a first amendment (the “SFRO Amendment”) to the SFRO Credit Agreement. The SFRO Amendment provided for an incremental $10.35 million term loan (the “Term A-1 Loan”) in favor of Coconut Creek issued for purposes of (i) refinancing approximately $5.64 million in existing capitalized lease obligations owing to First Financial Corporate Leasing, including a prepayment premium, (ii) repaying the approximately $2.55 million intercompany loan made by 21C to pay the capitalized lease obligations owing to First Financial Corporate Leasing and (iii) pay fees, costs and expenses of the transactions related to the SFRO Amendment.

 

The SFRO Term Loans were subject to variable interest rates. In addition, the Term B Loan contained a provision allowing 21C East Florida to elect payment in kind interest payments.

 

A portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the Company’s South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans on September 26, 2014.

 

We believe available borrowings under our credit facilities, together with our cash flows from operations, will be sufficient to fund our currently anticipated operating requirements. To the extent available borrowings and cash flows from operations are insufficient to fund future requirements, we may be required to seek additional financing through additional increases in our senior secured credit facilities, negotiate additional credit facilities with other lenders or institutions or seek additional capital through private placements or public offerings of equity or debt securities. No assurances can be given that we will be able to extend or increase our senior secured credit facilities, secure additional bank borrowings or lease line of credit or complete additional debt or equity financings on terms favorable to us or at all. Our ability to meet our funding needs could be adversely affected if we experience a decline in our results of operations, or if we violate the covenants and other restrictions to which we are subject under our senior secured credit facilities.

 

Finance Obligation

 

We lease certain of our treatment centers (each, a “facility” and, collectively, the “facilities”) and other properties from partnerships that are majority-owned by related parties (each, a “related party lessor” and, collectively, the “related party lessors”). See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” The related party lessors construct the facilities in accordance with our plans and specifications and subsequently lease these facilities to us. Due to the related party relationship, we are considered the owner of these facilities during the construction period pursuant to the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 840-40, “Sale-Leaseback Transactions” (“ASC 840-40”). In accordance with ASC 840-40, we record a construction in progress asset for these facilities with a corresponding finance obligation during the construction period. These related parties guarantee the debt of the related party lessors, which is considered to be “continuing involvement” pursuant to ASC 840-40. Accordingly, these leases did not qualify as a normal sale-leaseback at the time that construction was completed and these facilities were leased to us. As a result, the costs to construct the facilities and the related finance obligation are recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets after construction was completed. The construction costs are included in “Real Estate Subject to Finance Obligation” in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the accompanying notes. The finance obligation is amortized over the lease during the construction period term based on the payments designated in the lease agreements.

 

55



Table of Contents

 

Billing and Collections

 

Our billing system in the U.S. utilizes a fee schedule for billing patients, third-party payers and government sponsored programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. Fees billed to government sponsored programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and fees billed to contracted payers and self pay patients (not covered under other third party payer arrangements) are automatically adjusted to the allowable payment amount at time of billing. In 2009, we updated our billing system to include fee schedules on approximately 98% of all payers and developed a blended rate allowable amount on the remaining payers. As a result of this change in 2009, fees billed to all payers are automatically adjusted to the allowable payment at time of billing.

 

Insurance information is requested from all patients either at the time the first appointment is scheduled or at the time of service. A copy of the insurance card is scanned into our system at the time of service so that it is readily available to staff during the collection process. Patient demographic information is collected for both our clinical and billing systems.

 

It is our policy to collect co-payments from the patient at the time of service. Insurance benefit information is obtained and the patient is informed of their deductible and co-payment responsibility prior to the commencement of treatment.

 

Charges are posted to the billing system by coders in our offices or in our central billing office. After charges are posted, edits are performed, any necessary corrections are made and billing forms are generated, then sent electronically to our clearinghouse whenever electronic submission is possible. Any bills not able to be processed through the clearinghouse are printed and mailed from our print mail service. Statements are automatically generated from our billing system and mailed to the patient on a regular basis for any amounts still outstanding from the patient. Daily, weekly and monthly accounts receivable analysis reports are utilized by staff and management to prioritize accounts for collection purposes, as well as to identify trends and issues. Strategies to respond proactively to these issues are developed at weekly and monthly team meetings. Our write-off process requires manual review and our process for collecting accounts receivable is dependent on the type of payer as set forth below.

 

Medicare, Medicaid and Commercial Payer Balances

 

Our central billing office staff expedites the payment process from insurance companies and other payers via electronic inquiries, phone calls and automated letters to ensure timely payment. Our billing system generates standard aging reports by date of billing in increments of 30 day intervals. The collection team utilizes these reports to assess and determine the payers requiring additional focus and collection efforts. Our accounts receivable exposure on Medicare, Medicaid and commercial payer balances are largely limited to denials and other unusual adjustments. Our exposure to bad debt on balances relating to these types of payers over the years has been insignificant.

 

In the event of denial of payment, we follow the payer’s standard appeals process, both to secure payment and to lobby the payers, as appropriate, to modify their medical policies to expand coverage for the newer and more advanced treatment services that we provide which, in many cases, is the payer’s reason for denial of payment. If all reasonable collection efforts with these payers have been exhausted by our central billing office staff, the account receivable is written-off.

 

Self-Pay Balances

 

We administer self-pay account balances through our central billing office and our policy is to first attempt to collect these balances although after initial attempts we often send outstanding self-pay patient claims to collection agencies at designated points in the collection process. In some cases monthly payment arrangements are made with patients for the account balance remaining after insurance payments have been applied. These accounts are reviewed monthly to ensure payments continue to be made in a timely manner. Once it has been determined by our staff that the patient is not responding to our collection attempts, a final notice is mailed. This generally occurs more than 120 days after the date of the original bill. If there is no response to our final notice, after 30 days the account is assigned to a collection agency and, as appropriate, recorded as a bad debt and written off. We also have payment arrangements with patients for the self-pay portion due in which monthly payments are made by the patient on a predetermined schedule. Balances under $50 are written off but not sent to the collection agency. All accounts are specifically identified for write-offs and accounts are written off prior to being submitted to the collection agency.

 

56



Table of Contents

 

Acquisitions and Developments

 

The following table summarizes our growth in treatment centers and the local markets in which we operate for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Nine Months
Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Treatment centers at beginning of period

 

127

 

126

 

163

 

Internally developed / reopened

 

2

 

3

 

1

 

Transitioned to freestanding

 

2

 

 

1

 

Internally (consolidated / closed / sold)

 

(3

)

(7

)

(10

)

Acquired

 

2

 

38

 

20

 

Hospital-based / other groups

 

(2

)

3

 

4

 

Hospital-based (ended / transitioned)

 

(2

)

 

(1

)

Treatment centers at period end

 

126

 

163

 

178

 

 

On February 6, 2012, we acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice and a medical oncology group located in Asheville, North Carolina for approximately $0.9 million.  The acquisition of the radiation oncology practice and the medical oncology group, further expands our presence in the Western North Carolina market and builds on our ICC model.

 

In March 2012, we entered into a license agreement with the North Broward Hospital District to license the space and equipment and assume responsibility for the operation of the two radiation therapy departments at Broward General Medical Center and North Broward Medical Center as part of our value added services offering.  The license agreement runs for an initial term of ten years, with three separate five year renewal options.  We recorded approximately $4.3 million of tangible assets relating to the use of medical equipment pursuant to the license agreement.

 

On March 30, 2012, we acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice for $26.0 million and two urology groups located in Sarasota/Manatee counties in Southwest Florida for approximately $1.6 million, for a total purchase price of approximately $27.6 million, comprised of $21.9 million in cash and assumed capital lease obligation of approximately $5.7 million.  The acquisition of the radiation oncology practice and the two urology groups, further expands our presence in the Sarasota/Manatee counties and builds on our ICC model.

 

On August 22, 2012, we opened a de novo radiation treatment center in Argentina.  The development of this radiation treatment center further expands our presence in the Latin America market.

 

In December 2012, we purchased the remaining 50% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture which operates a freestanding radiation treatment center in West Palm Beach, Florida for approximately $1.1 million.

 

During 2012, we acquired the assets of several ICC physician practices in Arizona, California and Florida for approximately $1.7 million. The physician practices provide synergistic clinical services and an ICC service to our patients in the respective markets in which we provide radiation therapy treatment services.

 

On May 25, 2013, we acquired the assets of five radiation oncology practices and a urology group located in Lee/Collier counties in Southwest Florida for approximately $28.5 million, comprised of $17.7 million in cash, seller financing note of approximately $2.1 million and assumed capital lease obligations of approximately $8.7 million. The acquisition of the five radiation treatment centers and the urology group further expands our presence into the Southwest Florida market and builds on our ICC model.

 

In June 2013, we sold our 45% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture which operated a radiation treatment center in Providence, Rhode Island in partnership with a hospital to provide stereotactic radio-surgery through the use of a cyberknife for approximately $1.5 million.

 

In June 2013, we contributed our Casa Grande, Arizona radiation physician practice, ICC practice and approximately $5.2 million to purchase a 55.0% interest in a joint venture which included an additional radiation physician practice and an expansion of an ICC model that includes medical oncology, urology and dermatology.

 

In July 2013, we purchased a company, which operates a radiation treatment center in Tijuana, Mexico for approximately $1.6 million. The acquisition of this operating treatment center expands our presence in the international markets.

 

In July 2013, we purchased the remaining 38.0% interest in a joint venture radiation facility, located in Woonsocket, Rhode Island from our hospital partner for approximately $1.5 million.

 

In July 2013, we signed a contract to extend our relationship with Northern Westchester Hospital in Westchester County, NY for an additional 8 years. We will continue to provide advanced technical and administrative services to the hospital, continuing our longstanding partnership to serve patients in the region.

 

In September 2013, we signed a value added services agreement with Mercy Medical Center in Redding, CA, part of Dignity Health, to provide oncology services. This agreement adds to our presence in the strategic market of California, where we recently expanded operations through the acquisition of OnCure.

 

57



Table of Contents

 

In September 2013, we were awarded a hospital contract to provide radiation oncology treatment services at the Naval Hospital in Argentina.

 

On October 25, 2013, we completed the acquisition of OnCure for approximately $125.0 million (excluding capital leases, working capital and other adjustments) . The transaction was funded through a combination of cash on hand, borrowings from our senior secured credit facility and the assumption of $82.5 million in senior secured notes of OnCure, which accrue interest at a rate of 11.75% per annum and mature on January 15, 2017, of which $7.5 million is subject to escrow arrangements and will be released to holders upon satisfaction of certain conditions.

 

OnCure operates radiation oncology treatment centers for cancer patients. It contracts with radiation oncology physician groups and their radiation oncologists through long-term management services agreements to offer cancer patients a comprehensive range of radiation oncology treatment options, including most traditional and next generation services. OnCure provides services to a network of 11 physician groups that treat cancer patients at its 33 radiation oncology treatment centers, making it one of the largest strategically located networks of radiation oncology service providers. OnCure has treatment centers located in California, Florida and Indiana, where it provides the physician groups with the use of the facilities and with certain clinical services of treatment center staff, and administers the non-medical business functions of the treatment centers, such as technical staff recruiting, marketing, managed care contracting, receivables management and compliance, purchasing, information systems, accounting, human resource management and physician succession planning.

 

On October 30, 2013, we acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice located in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina for approximately $2.2 million.  We plan to refurbish the facility and upgrade to the latest advanced technologies. The acquisition of the radiation oncology practice further expands our presence in the eastern North Carolina market.

 

During 2013, we acquired the assets of several physician practices in Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, New Jersey, and Rhode Island for approximately $0.8 million. The physician practices provide synergistic clinical services and an ICC service to our patients in the respective markets in which we provide radiation therapy treatment services.

 

In January 2014, we sold a 20% share of our Southern New England Regional Cancer Care joint venture each to Care New England Health System (“CNE”) and Roger Williams Medical Center.  Also during the quarter CNE acquired a 20% interest in our Roger Williams Medical Center joint venture.  The incorporation of CNE reflects the addition of another important long-term partnership with a leading health system.

 

On January 13, 2014, CarePoint purchased the membership interest in Quantum Care, LLC for approximately $1.9 million. CarePoint offers a comprehensive suite of cancer management solutions to insurers, providers, employers and other entities that are financially responsible for the health of defined populations. With proven capabilities to manage medical, radiation and surgical oncology care across the entire continuum of settings, CarePoint represents a unique offering in the health services marketplace. Advanced technology and third-party administrator services, cost management solutions and a focused oncology-specific clinical model enable CarePoint to improve quality and reduce total oncology cost of care for its clients. CarePoint tailors its solutions to the needs of each customer and provides assistance through full-risk transfer, “a la carte” administrative services only packages or hybrid models.

 

On January 15, 2014, we purchased a 69% interest in a legal entity that operates a radiation oncology facility in Guatemala City, Guatemala for approximately $0.9 million plus the assumption of approximately $3.1 million in debt.  The facility is strategically located in Guatemala City’s medical corridor and, when combined with our existing center, we believe will significantly enhance our level of services.

 

In January 2014, we entered a strategic partnership with ProHealth Care Associates, LLP and opened a new de novo state-of-the-art radiation therapy center in Riverhead, New York. ProHealth is the largest physician group practice in the metropolitan New York area with over 500 physicians in over 150 offices treating over 750,000 covered lives.

 

On February 10, 2014, we purchased a 65% equity interest in South Florida Radiation Oncology (“SFRO”) for approximately $55.4 million, subject to working capital and other customary adjustments. The transaction was primarily funded with the proceeds of a new $60 million term loan facility that accrues interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin of 10.50% per annum and matures on January 15, 2017 and $7.9 million of term loans to refinance existing SFRO debt.

 

SFRO operates 21 radiation treatment centers throughout south Florida. SFRO increases the number of treatment centers by approximately 10% and is expected to add approximately 591 average treatments per day.

 

On March 26, 2014 we purchased a 75% interest in a legal entity that operates a radiation oncology facility in Villa Maria, Argentina for approximately $0.5 million. The purchase of this radiation oncology facility further expands our presence in the Latin America market.

 

On April 21, 2014, we acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice located in Boca Raton, Florida for approximately $0.4 million plus the assumption of approximately $2.7 million in debt. The acquisition of the radiation oncology practice further expands our presence in the Broward County market.

 

On May 5, 2014, we purchased the remaining 50% interest we did not already own in an unconsolidated joint venture which operates a freestanding radiation treatment center in Lauderdale Lakes, Florida for approximately $0.5 million.

 

During 2014, we acquired the assets of several physician practices in Florida for approximately $0.3 million. The physician practices provide synergistic clinical services and an ICC service to its patients in the respective markets in which we provide radiation therapy treatment services.

 

The operations of the foregoing acquisitions have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss from the respective dates of each acquisition. When we acquire a treatment center, the purchase price is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values.

 

                             On January 2, 2015, we purchased a 80% interest in a legal entity that that operates a radiation oncology facility in Kennewick, Washington for approximately $17.6 million. The acquisition expands our presence into the state of Washington. The purchase agreement contains a provision for earn out payments, contingent upon achieving certain EBITDA targets measured over three years from the acquisition date. The earn out payments cannot exceed approximately $3.4 million.

 

On January 6, 2015, we acquired the assets of a radiation oncology practice located in Warwick, Rhode Island for approximately $8.0 million. The acquisition further expands our presence in Rhode Island.

 

On January 6, 2015, we acquired the additional assets of a radiation oncology practice we already manage located in Hollywood, Florida for approximately $0.5 million.

 

In January 2012, we ceased provision of professional services at our Lee County — Florida hospital based treatment center.

 

In February 2012, we closed a radiation treatment facility in Owings Mills, Maryland.

 

58



Table of Contents

 

In March 2012, we terminated our arrangement to provide professional services at a hospital in Seaford, Delaware.

 

In July 2012, we closed a radiation treatment facility in Monroe, Michigan, and we constructed a replacement de novo radiation treatment center in Troy, Michigan which opened for operation in February 2013.

 

In October 2012, we sold our membership interest in an unconsolidated joint venture in Mohali, India to our former partner in the joint venture for a nominal amount.

 

In November 2012, we reopened our East Naples, Florida radiation treatment center to support the influx of patients in our southwest Florida local market.

 

In February 2013, we completed a replacement de novo radiation treatment facility in Troy, Michigan. This facility replaces an existing radiation treatment facility we closed in July 2012 in Monroe, Michigan.

 

In May and July 2013, we closed two radiation treatment facilities in Lee County — Florida, as a result of the purchase of the 5 radiation oncology practices in Lee/Collier counties in Southwest Florida.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we closed three radiation treatment facilities in Lee/Collier Counties - Florida, as a result of the purchase of the 5 radiation oncology practices in Lee/Collier counties in Southwest Florida and one radiation treatment facility in central Arizona.

 

During the first quarter of 2014, we closed two radiation treatment facilities, one located in Lee County — Florida and another facility located in Charlotte County — Florida, as a result of the purchase on the OnCure transaction.

 

During the second quarter of 2014, we closed six radiation treatment facilities, three located in Broward and Palm Beach Counties, two located in Sarasota/Manatee Counties, and one in Southern California, all as a result of the purchase of the OnCure and SFRO transactions.

 

During the third quarter of 2014, we closed two radiation treatment facilities, one located in Central Maryland and one located in the Palm Springs, California market.

 

As of September 30, 2014, we have four additional de novo radiation treatment centers in development located in Bolivia, Dominican Republic, North Carolina and South Carolina. The internal development of radiation treatment centers is subject to a number of risks including but not limited to risks related to negotiating and finalizing agreements, construction delays, unexpected costs, obtaining required regulatory permits, licenses and approvals and the availability of qualified healthcare and administrative professionals and personnel. As such, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully develop radiation treatment centers in accordance with our current plans and any failure or material delay in successfully completing planned internally developed treatment centers could harm our business and impair our future growth.

 

We have been selected by a consortium of leading New York academic medical centers (including Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Beth Israel Medical Center/Continuum Health System, NYU Langone Medical Center, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, and Montefiore Medical Center) to serve as the developer and manager of a proton beam therapy center to be constructed in Manhattan. The project is in the final stages of certificate of need approval. As a result of NY Proton’s continued operating losses since its inception in 2010 and our liquidity issues experienced during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we provided notice to the consortium that we may not be able to provide the full commitment of approximately $10.0 million to this project. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement entered into with CPPIB on September 26, 2014, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to transfer and sell our ownership interest to the consortium or to a third party and transfer the general manager role and any future management services fees to the consortium or a third party. We have accounted for our interest in the center as an equity method investment. The center is expected to commence operations in late-2016.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We continuously evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our management’s subjective or complex judgment because of the sensitivity of the methods, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Variable Interest Entities

 

                                                We evaluate certain of our radiation oncology practices in order to determine if they are variable interest entities (“VIE”). This evaluation resulted in determining that certain of our radiation oncology practices were potential variable interests. For each of these practices, we have determined (1) the sufficiency of the fair value of the entities’ equity investments at risk to absorb losses, (2) that, as a group, the holders of the equity investments at risk have (a) the direct or indirect ability through voting rights to make decisions about the entities’ significant activities, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity and their obligations are not protected directly or indirectly, and (c) the right to receive the expected residual return of the entity, and (3) substantially all of the entities’ activities do not involve or are not conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately fewer voting rights in terms of its obligation to absorb the expected losses or its right to receive expected residual returns of the entity, or both. ASC 810, “Consolidation” (“ASC 810”), requires a company to consolidate VIEs if the company is the primary beneficiary of the activities of those entities. Certain of our radiation oncology practices are variable interest entities and we have a variable interest in certain of these practices through our administrative services agreements. Pursuant to ASC 810, through our variable interests in these practices, we have the power to direct the activities of these practices that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and we would absorb a majority of the expected losses of these practices should they occur. Based on these

 

59



Table of Contents

 

determinations, we have included these radiation oncology practices in our consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

We adopted updated accounting guidance beginning with the first quarter of 2010, by providing an ongoing qualitative rather than quantitative assessment of our ability to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and our rights or obligations to receive benefits or absorb losses, in order to determine whether those entities will be required to be consolidated in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The adoption of the new guidance had no material impact to our financial position and results of operations.

 

Net Patient Service Revenue and Allowances for Contractual Discounts

 

We have agreements with third-party payers that provide us payments at amounts different from our established rates. Net patient service revenue is reported at the estimated net realizable amounts due from patients, third-party payers and others for services rendered. Net patient service revenue is recognized as services are provided. Medicare and other governmental programs reimburse physicians based on fee schedules, which are determined by the related government agency. We also have agreements with managed care organizations to provide physician services based on negotiated fee schedules. Accordingly, the revenues reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements are recorded at the amount that is expected to be received.

 

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from Medicare, Medicaid and other payers that receive discounts from our standard charges. We must estimate the total amount of these discounts to prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements. The Medicare and Medicaid regulations and various managed care contracts under which these discounts must be calculated are complex and subject to interpretation and adjustment. We estimate the allowance for contractual discounts on a payer class basis given our interpretation of the applicable regulations or contract terms. These interpretations sometimes result in payments that differ from our estimates. Additionally, updated regulations and contract renegotiations occur frequently necessitating regular review and assessment of the estimation process. Changes in estimates related to the allowance for contractual discounts affect revenues reported in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.  If our overall estimated allowance for contractual discounts on our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 were changed by 1%, our after-tax loss from continuing operations would change by approximately $0.1 million. This is only one example of reasonably possible sensitivity scenarios. A significant increase in our estimate of contractual discounts for all payers would lower our earnings. This would adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and future access to capital.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, approximately 42% and 45%, respectively, of our U.S. domestic net patient service revenue related to services rendered under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In the ordinary course of business, we are potentially subject to a review by regulatory agencies concerning the accuracy of billings and sufficiency of supporting documentation of procedures performed. Laws and regulations governing the Medicare and Medicaid programs are extremely complex and subject to interpretation. As a result, there is at least a reasonable possibility that estimates will change by a material amount in the near term.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts

 

Accounts receivable are reported net of estimated allowances for doubtful accounts and contractual adjustments. Accounts receivable are uncollateralized and primarily consist of amounts due from third-party payers and patients. To provide for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the carrying amount of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. The credit risk for other concentrations (other than Medicare) of receivables is limited due to the large number of insurance companies and other payers that provide payments for our services. We do not believe that there are any other significant concentrations of receivables from any particular payer that would subject us to any significant credit risk in the collection of our accounts receivable.

 

The amount of the provision for doubtful accounts is based upon our assessment of historical and expected net collections, business and economic conditions, trends in Federal and state governmental healthcare coverage and other collection indicators. The primary tool used in our assessment is an annual, detailed review of historical collections and write-offs of accounts receivable as they relate to aged accounts receivable balances. The results of our detailed review of historical collections and write-offs, adjusted for changes in trends and conditions, are used to evaluate the allowance amount for the current period.  If the actual bad debt allowance percentage applied to the applicable aging categories would change by 1% from our estimated bad debt allowance percentage for the year ended December 31, 2013, our after-tax loss from continuing operations would change by approximately $0.7 million and our net accounts receivable would change by approximately $1.1 million at December 31, 2013. The resulting change in this analytical tool is considered to be a reasonably likely change that would affect our overall assessment of this critical accounting estimate.  Accounts receivable are written-off after collection efforts have been followed in accordance with our policies.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired by us in business combinations. Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are not amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. As we began to experience some liquidity issues after terminating our previously planned initial public offering, we began to have discussions with an ad hoc group of holders of our outstanding notes.  On July 29, 2014, we entered into a Recapitalization Support Agreement. The Recapitalization Support Agreement set forth the terms through which we expected to either (a) obtain additional liquidity through an equity contribution or subordinated debt incurred in a minimum amount of $150 million on or before October 1, 2014 or (b) consummate a Recapitalization consistent with the material terms and conditions described in the Recapitalization Term Sheet attached to the Recapitalization Support Agreement.

 

We performed an interim impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We completed the first step of the impairment test as of June 30, 2014 and determined that the carrying amount of one of the reporting units exceeded its estimated implied fair value, thereby requiring performance of the second step of the impairment test to calculate the amount of the impairment. In accordance with ASC 350, we recorded a preliminary estimated non-cash impairment loss of approximately $182 million in the condensed consolidated

 

60



Table of Contents

 

statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the quarter ended June 30, 2014. We completed the second step of the impairment test and recorded an impairment loss of approximately $46.3 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

 

In addition to the goodwill impairment losses noted above, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $1.2 million during the third quarter of 2014 related to the write-off of our 33.6% investment interest in a development stage proton therapy center located in New York (“NY Proton”). As a result of NY Proton’s continued operating losses since its inception in 2010 and our liquidity issues experienced during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we provided notice to the consortium that we may not be able to provide the full commitment of approximately $10.0 million to this project. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreement entered into with CPPIB on September 26, 2014, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to transfer and sell our ownership interest to the consortium or to a third party and transfer the general manager role and any future management services fees to the consortium or a third party.

 

During the third quarter of 2012 we recognized goodwill impairment of approximately $69.9 million as a result of the final rule issued on the Physician Fee Schedule for 2013 by CMS on November 1, 2012, which included certain rate reductions on Medicare payments to freestanding radiation oncology providers as well as the changes in treatment patterns and volumes in prostate cancer as a result of the slowing rate of men diagnosed and referred to treatment regimens, as a result of the Preventative Services Task Force report issued in May 2012 recommending against routine PSA screenings for healthy men, as well as suggested changes in treatment pattern for low risk prostate cancer away from definitive treatment. During the fourth quarter of 2012 we incurred an impairment loss of approximately $11.1 million. Approximately $10.8 million relating to goodwill impairment in certain of our reporting units and approximately $0.1 million related to the impairment of certain leasehold improvements in the Delmarva Peninsula local market and approximately $0.2 million related to a consolidated joint venture in the Central Maryland local market. There was no goodwill impairment recorded for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including the unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. Based on (i) assessment of current and expected future economic conditions, (ii) trends, strategies and forecasted cash flows at each reporting unit and (iii) assumptions similar to those that market participants would make in valuing the reporting units.

 

The estimated fair value measurements were developed using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). For goodwill, the primary valuation technique used was an income methodology based on estimates of forecasted cash flows for each reporting unit, with those cash flows discounted to present value using rates commensurate with the risks of those cash flows. In addition, a market- based valuation method involving analysis of market multiples of revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for (i) a group of comparable public companies and (ii) recent transactions, if any, involving comparable companies. Assumptions used are similar to those that would be used by market participants performing valuations of regional divisions. Assumptions were based on analysis of current and expected future economic conditions and the strategic plan for each reporting unit.

 

Intangible assets consist of trade names, non-compete agreements, licenses and hospital contractual relationships. Trade names have an indefinite life and are tested annually for impairment. Non-compete agreements, licenses and hospital contractual relationships are amortized over the life of the agreement (which typically ranges from 2 to 20 years) using the straight-line method. No intangible asset impairment loss was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

In accordance with ASC 360, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Assessment of possible impairment of a particular asset is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of such asset based on our estimate of its undiscounted future cash flows. If these estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment charge would be recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

All share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss over the requisite service period.

 

For purposes of determining the compensation expense associated with the 2012 and 2013 equity-based incentive plan grants, we engaged a third party valuation company to value the business enterprise using a variety of widely accepted valuation techniques, which considered a number of factors such as the financial performance of the Company, the values of comparable companies and the lack of marketability of the Company’s equity. The third party valuation company then used the probability-weighted expected return method (“PWERM”) to determine the fair value of these units at the time of grant. Under the PWERM, the value of the units is estimated based upon an analysis of future values for the enterprise assuming various future outcomes (exits) as well as the rights of each unit class. In developing assumptions for the various exit scenarios, management considered the Company’s ability to achieve certain growth and profitability milestone in order to maximize shareholder value at the time of potential exit. Management considers an initial public offering of the Company’s stock to be one of the exit scenarios for the current shareholders, as well as a sale or merger/acquisition transaction. For the scenarios the enterprise value at exit was estimated based on a multiple of the Company’s EBITDA for the fiscal year preceding the exit date. The enterprise value for the scenario where the Company stays private (and under the majority ownership of Vestar Capital Partners, Inc., our equity sponsor) was estimated based on a discounted cash flow analysis as well as guideline company market approach. The guideline companies were publicly-traded companies that were deemed comparable to the Company. The discount rate analysis also leveraged market data of the same guideline companies. For each PWERM scenario, management estimated probability factors based on the outlook of the Company and the industry as well as prospects and timing for a potential exit based on information known or knowable as of the grant date. The probability-weighted unit values calculated at each potential exit date was present-valued to the grant date to estimate the per-unit value. The discount rate utilized in the present value calculation was the cost of equity calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”) and based on the market data of the guideline companies as well as historical data published by Morningstar, Inc. For each PWERM scenario, the per unit values were adjusted for lack of marketability discount to determine unit value on a minority, non-marketable basis.

 

61



Table of Contents

 

For 2012 and 2013, the estimated fair value of the units, less an assumed forfeiture rate of 3.9%, is recognized in expense in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards for Class MEP Units. For Class MEP Units, the requisite service period is approximately 18 months, and for Class EMEP Units, the requisite service period is 36 months only if probable of being met. The Class M Units and O Units compensation will be recognized upon the sale of the Company or an initial public offering. Under the terms of the incentive unit grant agreements governing the grants of the Class M Units and Class O Units, in the event of an initial public offering of the Company’s common stock, holders have certain rights to receive shares of restricted common stock of the Company in exchange for their Class M Units and Class O Units. The assumed forfeiture rate is based on an average historical forfeiture rate. All outstanding Class EMEP Units and Class L units were canceled without payment to the holder thereof in connect with 21CI’s entry into the Fourth Amended LLC Agreement.

 

Grants under 2013 Plan

 

On December 9, 2013, 21CI entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “Fourth Amended LLC Agreement”) which replaced the Third Amended LLC Agreement in its entirety. The Fourth Amended LLC Agreement established new classes of incentive equity units (such new units, together with Class MEP Units, as modified under the Fourth Amended LLC Agreement, the “2013 Plan”) in 21CI in the form of Class M Units, Class N Units and Class O Units for issuance to employees, officers, directors and other service providers, eliminated 21CI’s Class L Units and Class EMEP Units, and modified the distribution entitlements for holders of each existing class of equity units of 21CI.

 

Income Taxes

 

We make estimates in recording our provision for income taxes, including determination of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities and any valuation allowances that might be required against the deferred tax assets. ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. For the year ended December 31, 2012 and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we determined that the valuation allowance was approximately $82.3 million, consisting of $70.3 million against federal deferred tax assets and $12.0 million against state deferred tax assets. This represented an increase of $36.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we determined that the valuation allowance should be $97.4 million, consisting of $87.5 million against federal deferred tax assets and $9.9 million against state deferred tax assets. This represents an increase of $15.1 million in valuation allowance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we determined that the valuation allowance should be $96.8 million consisting of $86.9 million against federal deferred assets and $9.9 million against state deferred tax assets.  This represents a decrease of $0.6 million.

 

ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under ASC 740, the impact of an uncertain tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, ASC 740 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

 

We are subject to taxation in the United States, approximately 25 state jurisdictions, the Netherlands, and throughout Latin America, namely, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala and Mexico. However, the principal jurisdictions for which we are subject to tax are the United States, Florida and Argentina.

 

Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws, interpretations thereof. We monitor the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and makes adjustments, if required, throughout the year. If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating our annual effective tax rates, future income tax expense (benefit) could be materially affected.

 

In addition, we are routinely under audit by federal, state, or local authorities in the areas of income taxes and other taxes. These audits include questioning the timing and amount of deductions and compliance with federal, state, and local tax laws. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes from these audits to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. To the extent we prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, the effective tax rate could be materially affected.

 

During the second and third quarters of 2014, we reached a favorable settlement with the US Internal Revenue Service related to tax years 2007 and 2008 and various state and local jurisdictions related to tax years 2005 through 2012.  As a result, we released $2.1 million of previously recorded reserves.  During the third quarter of 2013, we closed the federal income tax audit related to calendar year 2009 with no material adjustments. We closed the New York State audit for tax years 2006 through 2008 with a favorable result during the first quarter of 2013.

 

New Pronouncements

 

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740):Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (ASU 2013-11), which amends ASC 740 to clarify balance sheet presentation requirements of unrecognized tax benefits. ASU 2013-11 was effective for us on January 1, 2014. We adopted ASC 740 and reclassified approximately $1.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits from income taxes payable to other long term liabilities.

 

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU 2014-08 changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 205-20, such that a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. ASU 2014-08 requires an entity to present, for

 

62



Table of Contents

 

each comparative period, the assets and liabilities of a disposal group that includes a discontinued operation separately in the asset and liability sections, respectively, of the statement of financial position, as well as additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Additionally, ASU 2014-08 requires disclosures about a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements and expands the disclosures about an entity’s significant continuing involvement with a discontinued operation. The accounting update is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The core principle of the guidance in ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance, which will be effective beginning January 1, 2017.

 

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40).” The new guidance addresses management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued. The standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect to early adopt this guidance and do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Reimbursement, Legislative And Regulatory Changes

 

Legislative and regulatory action has resulted in continuing changes in reimbursement under the Medicare and Medicaid programs that will continue to limit payments we receive under these programs.

 

Within the statutory framework of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, there are substantial areas subject to legislative and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations, and discretion which may further affect payments made under those programs, and the federal and state governments may, in the future, reduce the funds available under those programs or require more stringent utilization and quality reviews of our treatment centers or require other changes in our operations. Additionally, there may be a continued rise in managed care programs and future restructuring of the financing and delivery of healthcare in the United States. These events could have an adverse effect on our future financial results.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these relationships.

 

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Interest Rate Sensitivity

 

We are exposed to various market risks as a part of our operations, and we anticipate that this exposure will increase as a result of our planned growth. In an effort to mitigate losses associated with these risks, we may at times enter into derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments may take the form of forward sales contracts, option contracts, and interest rate swaps. We have not and do not intend to engage in the practice of trading derivative securities for profit. Because our borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities will bear interest at variable rates, we are sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates.

 

Interest Rates

 

Outstanding balances under our senior secured credit facility bear interest based on either LIBOR plus an initial spread, or an alternate base rate plus an initial spread, at our option. Accordingly, an adverse change in interest rates would cause an increase in the amount of interest paid. As of September 30, 2014, we have interest rate exposure on $90.0 million of our senior secured credit facility. A 100 basis point change in interest rates on our senior secured credit facility would result in an increase of $0.9 million in the amount of annualized interest paid and annualized interest expense recognized in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. On August 25, 2014, Bryan J. Carey resigned as the President, Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman of the Company and from the offices and directorships he held with the Company’s subsidiaries.  We had appointed David Beckman as Interim Chief Financial Officer to serve in that role.  On November 25, 2014, 21C terminated its financial advisory and consulting agreement with FTI Consulting, Inc. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the agreement, effective as of December 26, 2014, David Beckman will no longer serve as the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer. Joseph Biscardi, the Company’s Senior Vice President, Assistant Treasurer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, will continue to serve as the Company’s principal financial officer.  The functions of Chief Financial Officer will be filled by individuals with significant tenure at 21C, including Richard Lewis, Chief Financial Officer-US Operations (9 years), Mr. Biscardi (17 years), and Frank G. English IV, Vice President-International Finance

 

63



Table of Contents

 

and Treasurer (3 years) until such time as a new Chief Financial Officer is appointed. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.

 

As of September 30, 2014, we completed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on our evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2014. In March 2014, we identified two material weaknesses in our internal communications regarding the identification of and accounting for the loss contingency, along with the related disclosure regarding certain subpoenas we received in February, 2014, from the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health & Human Services.  We have taken steps since then to remediate the internal control weaknesses, such that at September 30, 2014, our controls over the identification and accounting for loss contingencies operated effectively. We implemented a system of internal controls over financial reporting with respect to the accounting for loss contingencies, including the establishment of a disclosure committee and the assessment of future probable loss contingency accounting and methods.

 

64



Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings.

 

We operate in a highly regulated and litigious industry. As a result, we are involved in disputes, litigation, and regulatory matters incidental to our operations, including governmental investigations, personal injury lawsuits, employment claims, and other matters arising out of the normal conduct of business.

 

Healthcare companies are subject to numerous types of investigations by various governmental agencies. Further, under the False Claims Act, private parties have the right to bring ‘‘qui tam,’’ or ‘‘whistleblower,’’ suits against companies that knew or should have known they were submitting false claims for payments to, or improperly retain overpayments from, the government. The False Claims Act imposes penalties of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000, plus three times the amount of damages which the government sustains because of the submission of a false claim. If the Company is found to have violated the False Claims Act, it could also be excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. Some states have adopted similar state whistleblower and false claims provisions. Certain of our facilities have received, and other facilities may receive, inquiries from federal and state agencies related to potential False Claims Act liability. Depending on whether the underlying conduct in these or future inquiries or investigations could be considered systemic, their resolution could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

 

Governmental agencies and their agents, such as the Medicare Administrative Contractors, as well as the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (‘‘OIG’’), CMS and state Medicaid programs, conduct audits of our healthcare operations. Private payers may conduct similar post-payment audits, and we also perform internal audits and monitoring. Depending on the nature of the conduct found in such audits and whether the underlying conduct could be considered systemic, the resolution of these audits could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

 

On February 18, 2014, we were served with subpoenas from the OIG acting with the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida who together have requested the production of medical records of patients treated by certain of our physicians for the period from January 2007 to present regarding the ordering, billing and medical necessity of certain laboratory services as part of a civil False Claims Act investigation, as well as our agreements with such physicians. The laboratory services under review relate to the utilization of fluorescence in situ hybridization (“FISH”) laboratory tests ordered by certain of our employed physicians and performed by us.  We were served with another subpoena from the OIG on January 22, 2015, requesting additional documents related to this matter for the period from January 1, 2005 up through the production of documents responsive to the February 2014 subpoena.  We have recorded a liability for this matter of approximately $4.7 million and $5.1 million that is included in accrued expenses in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, respectively.  The recorded estimate is based on a probability weighted analysis of the low-end of the range of the liability that considers the facts currently known by us, our review of qualitative and quantitative factors, and our assessment of potential outcomes under different scenarios used to assess our exposure which may be used to determine a potential settlement should we decide not to litigate.  Our recording of a liability related to this matter is not an admission of guilt. Depending on how this matter progresses, our exposure may be less than or more than the liability recorded and we will continue to reassess and adjust the liability until this matter is settled.  Our estimate of the high-end of the range of exposure is $10.2 million.

 

We received two Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), one on October 22, 2014 addressed to 21C and one on October 31, 2014 addressed to SFRO, pursuant to the False Claims Act.  The CIDs request information concerning allegations that we knowingly billed for services that were not medically necessary and for services not rendered and appear to be focused on GAMMA services (which are dosimetry calculations performed during the course of radiation therapy).  The CIDs cover the period from January 1, 2009 to the present.  Among other information requests, the CIDs request certain documents and information related to the administration of radiation therapy; selection of various radiation therapies and GAMMA services.  Our total billings to federal health care programs including Medicare, Medicare Advantage and Medicaid for GAMMA services from January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2014 is approximately $64 million.  It is not possible to predict when these matters will be resolved or what impact they might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

 

Based on reviews performed to date, we do not believe that we or our physicians knowingly submitted false claims in violation of applicable statutory or regulatory requirements. We are cooperating fully with the subpoena requests and the DOJ’s investigation.

 

In addition to the matters described below, we are involved in various legal actions and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business.  We do not believe that an adverse decision in any of these matters would have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

You should carefully consider the “Risk Factors” section of the Form 10-K in evaluating us and our business before making an investment decision.  We have also added two new risk factors which are the fourth and fifth risk factors set below regarding our planned recapitalization. The other specific risk factors set forth below were included in our Form 10-K risk factors and have been updated to provide information as of September 30, 2014.  There have been no other material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Form 10-K in response to Item 1A. to Part I of the Form 10-K.  If any of the risks identified herein or in the Form 10-K, or any other risks and uncertainties that we have not yet identified or that we currently believe are not material, actually occur and are material it could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We depend on payments from government Medicare and, to a lesser extent, Medicaid programs for a significant amount of our revenue. Our business could be materially harmed by any changes that result in reimbursement reductions.

 

Our payer mix is concentrated with Medicare patients due to the high proportion of cancer patients over the age of 65. We estimate that approximately 47.7%, 45.3%, 44.6% and 42.1% of our U.S. net patient service revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, consisted of payments from Medicare and Medicaid. Only a small percentage of that revenue resulted from Medicaid patients, equaling approximately 2.8%, 2.7%, and 2.7% for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. In addition, Medicare Advantage represents approximately 13% of our 2013 U.S. net patient service revenue. These government programs generally reimburse us on a fee-for-service basis based on predetermined government reimbursement rate schedules. As a result of these reimbursement schedules, we are limited in the amount we can record as revenue for our services from these government programs. Following a public comment period, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) can change these schedules annually and therefore the prices that the agency pays for these services. In addition, if our operating costs increase, we will not be able to recover these costs from government payers. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in reimbursement for Medicare reimbursement. Various state Medicaid programs also have recently reduced Medicaid payments to providers based on state budget reductions. Although Medicaid reimbursement encompasses only a small portion of our business, there can be no certainty as to whether Medicaid reimbursement will increase or decrease in the future and what affect, if any, this will have on our business.

 

In the final Medicare 2013 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS reduced payments for radiation oncology by 7%. This reduction related to (1) the fourth year of the four-year transition to the utilization of new Physician Practice Information Survey (“PPIS”) data, (2) a change in equipment interest rate assumptions, (3) budget neutrality effects of a proposal to create a new discharge care management code, (4) input changes for certain radiation therapy procedures, and (5) certain other revised radiation oncology codes. The largest of these changes (accounting for 4% of the gross reduction) reflected the transition of the final 25% of PPIS data used in the PERVU methodology. The change in the CMS interest rate policy (accounting for 3% of the gross reduction) reduced interest rate assumptions in the CMS database from 11% to a sliding scale of 5.5% to 8%. CMS also finalized its proposal to create a HCPCS G-code to describe transition care management from a hospital or other institutional stay to a primary physician in the community (accounting for 1% of the gross reduction). While this policy benefited primary care, non-primary care physicians are negatively impacted due to the budget-neutrality of the Medicare 2013 Physician Fee Schedule. The rule also made adjustments (accounting for 1% of the gross reduction) due to the use of new time of care assumptions for IMRT and SBRT. Although the proposed reductions in time of care assumptions alone would have resulted in a gross 7% reduction to radiation oncology, CMS in its final rule included updated cost data submitted by the radiation oncology community for code inputs which reversed the vast majority of the reduction

 

65



Table of Contents

 

resulting from the new time of care assumptions. Total gross reductions in the final rule were offset by a 2% increase due to certain other revised radiation oncology codes, which resulted in a total net reduction to radiation oncology of 7%.

 

In the final Medicare 2014 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS did not finalize its proposal to cap certain radiation oncology services at the hospital outpatient department and ambulatory surgical center’s rate. Although CMS did finalize its proposal to revise the Medicare Economic Index (“MEI”) [-2% impact], CMS also incorporated updated relative value units (“RVUs”) for new and existing codes [+3% impact] resulting in a net impact of +1% for radiation oncology overall. Because the MEI policy only applies to freestanding settings, the impact to freestanding centers is approximately flat, while hospital-based radiation oncologists would receive an increase in payment under the final rule.

 

In the proposed Medicare 2015 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS proposed to reduce payments for radiation oncology by 4% overall.  This reduction related primarily to a proposal to remove the radiation treatment vault as a direct cost input for radiation treatment delivery codes.  Because the proposal only applied to freestanding settings, the cut to freestanding centers would likely have been closer to 5%, while hospital based radiation oncologists would have received an increase in payment under the proposal. In the final Medicare 2015 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS did not finalize its proposal to remove the radiation treatment vault as a direct cost input for radiation treatment delivery codes. As a result, the net impact of the Final Rule to radiation oncology and freestanding radiation therapy centers is approximately neutral overall. In the Final rule, CMS also indicated it would review the family of radiation treatment delivery codes in the CY 2016 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

 

Medicare reimbursement rates for all procedures under Medicare ultimately are determined by a formula which takes into account a conversion factor (“CF”) which is updated on an annual basis based on the Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”).  For the last several years, the SGR policy has threatened significant cuts to the CF, although Congress has consistently delayed those cuts. On April 1, 2014, the President signed H.R. 4302, the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 which extended the $35.8228 conversion factor through 2014 and also provided for a zero percent update through March 31, 2015.  If future SGR reductions are not suspended, and if a permanent “doc fix” is not signed into law, the currently scheduled SGR reimbursement decrease (estimated at more than 20%) will take effect on April 1, 2015. Due to budget neutrality requirements from certain policies in the final Medicare 2015 Physician Fee Schedule, the 2015 conversion factor would be slightly adjusted to $35.8013, assuming no SGR cuts.

 

In addition, under the Budget Control Act of 2011, Medicare providers are cut under a sequestration process by 2% each year relative to baseline spending through 2021. This policy was subsequently extended through 2024.  In the Protecting Access to Medicare Act, the sequestration policy was frontloaded for the year 2024 such that Medicare providers would be cut 4% in the first half of 2024 and 0% in the second half of 2024.

 

Reforms to the U.S. healthcare system may adversely affect our business.

 

On March 21, 2010, the House of Representatives passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and the corresponding reconciliation bill. President Obama signed the larger comprehensive bill into law on March 23, 2010 and the reconciliation bill on March 30, 2010 (collectively, the “Health Care Reform Act”). The comprehensive $940 billion dollar overhaul could extend coverage to approximately 32 million previously uninsured Americans.

 

A significant portion of our U.S. patient volume is derived from government programs, principally Medicare, which are highly regulated and subject to frequent and substantial changes. We anticipate the Health Care Reform Act will continue to significantly affect how the healthcare industry operates in relation to Medicare, Medicaid and the insurance industry. The Health Care Reform Act contains a number of provisions, including those governing fraud and abuse, enrollment in federal healthcare programs, and reimbursement changes, which impact existing government healthcare programs and will continue to result in the development of new programs, including Medicare payment for performance initiatives and improvements to the physician quality reporting system and feedback program.

 

On June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Health Care Reform Act’s “individual mandate” that will require individuals as of 2014 to either purchase health insurance or pay a penalty. The Supreme Court also held, however, that the federal government cannot force states to expand their Medicaid programs by threatening to cut their existing Medicaid funds. As a result of this decision, states are left with a choice about whether to expand their Medicaid programs to cover low-income, non-disabled adults without children. Numerous states opted not to expand their Medicaid program in 2014, which may materially impact our Medicaid revenue in these states.

 

The Health Care Reform Act provides for the creation of health insurance “Marketplaces” in each state where individuals can compare and enroll in Qualified Health Plans (“QHPs”).  Some QHPs will be partially subsidized by Federal funds. Individuals with an income less than 400% of the federal poverty level that purchase insurance on a Marketplace may be eligible for federal subsidies to cover a portion of their health insurance premium costs. In addition, they may be eligible for government cost sharing of co-insurance or co-pay obligations. The presence of Federal funds in QHPs in the form of subsidies and cost sharing may subject providers to heightened government attention and enforcement, which could significantly increase the cost of compliance and could materially impact our operations.

 

Furthermore, an open question remains whether the availability of these federal subsidies classifies a QHP as a federal healthcare program. In an October 30, 2013 letter, Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), indicated that DHHS does not consider QHPs to be federal healthcare programs. However, this statement by Secretary Sebelius has not been tested in court, and a judge may not agree. Additionally, a subsequent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) FAQ on November 4, 2013, as well as a November 7, 2013 letter from U.S. Senator Charles Grassley to Secretary Sebelius and Attorney General Eric Holder, indicates that this issue is not settled. If QHPs are classified as federal healthcare programs it could further increase the cost of compliance significantly for providers. The Health Care Reform Act has experienced several setbacks that heighten the uncertainty about its implementation. On October 1, 2013, the DHHS launched the federally-run insurance Marketplaces through its www.healthcare.gov website. The website has experienced multiple problems throughout its launch, which has limited the ability of individuals to sign up for healthcare coverage and has exposed security concerns. In addition, during the fall of 2013, millions of people with individual health insurance plans received cancellation letters from their insurance providers. These letters frequently expressed that plans were being cancelled because they failed to meet the new requirements of the Health Care Reform Act. In response, the White House announced that it would grant state insurance commissioners federal permission to allow consumers to keep existing health insurance policies through 2014. Several state insurance commissions have nonetheless continued to maintain that insurers cannot offer plans in 2014 unless they meet the requirements of the Health Care Reform Act. These implementation setbacks have called into question early predictions about the number of previously un-insured individuals who will obtain

 

66



Table of Contents

 

coverage through a Marketplace plan. In addition, certain members of Congress continue to introduce legislation that would repeal or significantly amend the Health Care Reform Act. Because of the continued uncertainty about the implementation of the Health Care Reform Act, we cannot predict the impact of the law or any future reforms on our business.

 

We can give no assurance that the Health Care Reform Act will not adversely affect our business and financial results, and we cannot predict how future federal or state legislative or administrative changes relating to healthcare reform would affect our business.

 

We could be the subject of governmental investigations, claims and litigation.

 

Healthcare companies are subject to numerous types of investigations by various governmental agencies. Further, under the False Claims Act, private parties have the right to bring “qui tam,” or “whistleblower,” suits against companies that knowingly submit false claims for payments to, or improperly retain overpayments from, the government. The False Claims Act imposes penalties of not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000, plus three times the amount of damages which the government sustains because of the submission of a false claim. In addition, if we are found to have violated the False Claims Act, we could be excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. Some states have adopted similar state whistleblower and false claims provisions. We have received inquiries from federal and state agencies related to potential False Claims Act liability. Depending on whether the underlying conduct in these or future inquiries or investigations could be considered systemic, their resolution could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

 

Governmental agencies and their agents, such as the Medicare Administrative Contractors, as well as the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”), CMS and state Medicaid programs, conduct audits of our healthcare operations. Private payers may conduct similar post-payment audits, and we also perform internal audits and monitoring. Depending on the nature of the conduct found in such audits and whether the underlying conduct could be considered systemic, the resolution of these audits could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

 

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 established the Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) three-year demonstration program to conduct post-payment reviews to detect and correct improper payments in the fee-for-service Medicare program. The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 made the RAC program permanent and expanded the program nationwide as of 2010. Since the nationwide expansion of the RAC program, CMS has recouped more than $5 billion in overpayments from fee-for-service Medicare providers. In addition, the Health Care Reform Act mandated the expansion of the RAC program to Medicaid. In 2011 CMS issued a Final Rule on Medicaid RAC program, requiring every state Medicaid agency to implement its Medicaid RAC program by 2012. State Medicaid agencies have also increased their review activities. Should we be found out of compliance with any of these laws, regulations or programs, depending on the nature of the findings, our business, our financial position and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

 

On February 18, 2014, we were served with subpoenas from the OIG acting with the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida who together have requested the production of medical records of patients treated by certain of our physicians for the period from January 2007 to present regarding the ordering, billing and medical necessity of certain laboratory services as part of a civil False Claims Act investigation, as well as our agreements with such physicians. The laboratory services under review relate to the utilization of fluorescence in situ hybridization (“FISH”) laboratory tests ordered by certain of our employed physicians and performed by us.  We were served with another subpoena from the OIG on January 22, 2015, requesting additional documents related to this matter for the period from January 1, 2005 up through the production of documents responsive to the February 2014 subpoena.  We have recorded a liability for this matter of approximately $4.7 million and $5.1 million that is included in accrued expenses in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014, respectively.  The recorded estimate is based on a probability weighted analysis of the low-end of the range of the liability that considers the facts currently known by us, our review of qualitative and quantitative factors, and our assessment of potential outcomes under different scenarios used to assess our exposure which may be used to determine a potential settlement should we decide not to litigate.  Our recording of a liability related to this matter is not an admission of guilt. Depending on how this matter progresses, our exposure may be less than or more than the liability recorded and we will continue to reassess and adjust the liability until this matter is settled.  Our estimate of the high-end of the range of exposure is $10.2 million.

 

We received two Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”), one on October 22, 2014 addressed to 21C and one on October 31, 2014 addressed to SFRO, from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) pursuant to the False Claims Act.  The CIDs request information concerning allegations that we knowingly billed for services that were not medically necessary and for services not rendered and appear to be focused on GAMMA services (which are dosimetry calculations performed during the course of radiation therapy).  The CIDs cover the period from January 1, 2009 to the present.  Among other information requests, the CIDs request certain documents and information related to the administration of radiation therapy; selection of various radiation therapies and GAMMA services.  Our total billings to federal health care programs including Medicare, Medicare Advantage and Medicaid for GAMMA services from January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2014 is approximately $64 million.  It is not possible to predict when these matters will be resolved or what impact they might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

 

Based on reviews performed to date, we do not believe that we or our physicians knowingly submitted false claims in violation of applicable statutory or regulatory requirements. We are cooperating fully with the subpoena requests and the DOJ’s investigation.

 

Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial condition.

 

We have $1.0 billion of total debt outstanding as of September 30, 2014. Our high level of debt could have adverse effects on our business and financial condition. Specifically, our high level of debt could have important consequences, including the following:

 

·                  making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our debt;

 

·                  limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements;

 

·                  requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes;

 

·                  increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

 

·                  limiting our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete;

 

67



Table of Contents

 

·                  placing us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors; and

 

·                  increasing our cost of borrowing.

 

Our ability to make scheduled payments on and to refinance our indebtedness depends on and is subject to our financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors beyond our control, including the availability of financing in the international banking and capital markets. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our debt, to refinance our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we are unable to meet our debt obligations or to fund our other liquidity needs, we will need to restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt, which could cause us to default on our debt obligations and impair our liquidity. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants which could further restrict our business operations.

 

We may encounter numerous business risks in identifying, acquiring and developing additional treatment centers, and may have difficulty operating and integrating those treatment centers.

 

Over the past three years ended December 31, 2013, we have acquired 69 treatment centers, acquired 3 professional/other centers, developed 5 treatment centers, developed 1 professional/other center and transitioned 2 professional/other centers to freestanding treatment centers, all of which includes our acquisition of OnCure which we completed on October 25, 2013. As part of our growth strategy, we expect to continue to add additional treatment centers in our existing and new local and international markets. When we acquire or develop additional treatment centers, we may:

 

·                  be unable to make acquisitions on terms favorable to us or at all;

 

·                  have difficulty identifying desirable targets or locations for treatment centers in suitable markets;

 

·                  be unable to obtain adequate financing to fund our growth strategy;

 

·                  be unable to successfully operate the treatment centers;

 

·                  have difficulty integrating their operations and personnel;

 

·                  be unable to retain physicians or key management personnel;

 

·                  acquire treatment centers with unknown or contingent liabilities, including liabilities for failure to comply with healthcare laws and regulations;

 

·                  experience difficulties with transitioning or integrating the information systems of acquired treatment centers;

 

·                  be unable to contract with third-party payers or attract patients to our treatment centers; and/or

 

·                  experience losses and lower gross revenues and operating margins during the initial periods of operating our newly-developed treatment centers.

 

Larger acquisitions could increase our potential exposure to business risks. Furthermore, integrating a new treatment center could be expensive and time consuming, and could disrupt our ongoing business and distract our management and other key personnel. In addition, we may incur significant transaction fees and expenses, including for potential transactions that are not consummated.

 

We may continue to explore acquisition opportunities outside of the United States when favorable opportunities are available to us. In addition to the risks set forth herein, foreign acquisitions involve unique risks including the particular economic, political and regulatory risks associated with the specific country, currency risks, the relative uncertainty regarding laws and regulations and the potential difficulty of integrating operations across different cultures and languages.

 

We currently plan to continue to develop new treatment centers in existing and new local markets, including international markets. We may not be able to structure economically beneficial arrangements in new markets as a result of healthcare laws applicable to such market or otherwise. If these plans change for any reason or the anticipated schedules for opening and costs of development are revised by us, we may be negatively impacted. There can be no assurance that these planned treatment centers will be completed or that, if developed, will achieve sufficient patient volume to generate positive operating margins. If we are unable to timely and efficiently integrate a newly-developed treatment center, our business could suffer.

 

In the case of OnCure, the business operates through a structure dependent on management services agreements. If we are unable to manage these management services agreements and the associated relationships, the business may suffer and the expected results of the acquisition may not be realized.

 

We cannot assure you that we will achieve the revenue and benefits identified in this quarterly report from completed acquisitions, including with respect to OnCure, or that we will achieve synergies and cost savings or benefits in connection with future acquisitions. In addition, many of the businesses that we have acquired and will acquire have unaudited financial statements that have been prepared by the management of such companies and have not been independently reviewed and audited. We cannot assure you that the financial statements of companies we have acquired or will acquire would not be materially different if such statements were audited. Finally, we cannot assure you that we will continue to acquire businesses at valuations consistent with our prior acquisitions or that we will complete acquisitions at all.

 

68



Table of Contents

 

We are exposed to local business risks in different countries, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

We have significant operations in foreign countries. Currently, we operate through 25 legal entities in Argentina, Costa Rica, The Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala and Mexico, in addition to our operations in the United States. Our offshore operations are subject to risks inherent in doing business in foreign countries, including, but not necessarily limited to:

 

·                  new and different legal and regulatory requirements in local jurisdictions, which may conflict with U.S. laws;

 

·                  local economic conditions;

 

·                  potential staffing difficulties and labor disputes;

 

·                  increased costs of transportation or shipping;

 

·                  credit risk and financial conditions of government, commercial and patient payers;

 

·                  risk of nationalization of private enterprises by foreign governments;

 

·                  potential imposition of restrictions on investments;

 

·                  potential restrictions on repatriation of funds, payments of dividends and other financial options integral to our investments and operations;

 

·                  potential declines in government and/or private payer reimbursement amounts for our services;

 

·                  potentially adverse tax consequences, including imposition or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by subsidiaries;

 

·                  foreign currency exchange restrictions and fluctuations; and

 

·                  local political and social conditions, including the possibility of hyperinflationary conditions and political or social instability in certain countries.

 

We may not be successful in developing and implementing policies and strategies to address the foregoing factors in a timely and effective manner at each location where we do business. Consequently, the occurrence of one or more of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our international operations or upon our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Further, our international operations require us to comply with a number of U.S. and international regulations. For example, we must comply with U.S. economic sanctions and export control laws in connection with exports of products and services, and we must comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), which prohibits U.S. companies or their agents and employees from providing anything of value to a foreign official or agent thereof for the purposes of influencing any act or decision of these individuals in their official capacity to help obtain or retain business, direct business to any person or corporate entity or obtain any unfair advantage. Any failure by us to ensure that our employees and agents comply with the FCPA, economic sanctions and export controls, and applicable laws and regulations in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial penalties or restrictions on our ability to conduct business in certain foreign jurisdictions, and our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

 

Local governments may take actions that are adverse to our interests and our business. For example, in 2012 Argentina’s government nationalized the country’s largest oil and gas company via taking a 51% stake. While no such proposal has been made or threatened with respect to any businesses in the Argentine healthcare sector, we have significant operations in Argentina and any such development could have a material adverse effect on our international operations or upon our financial condition and results of operations.

 

The Argentine government has implemented certain measures that control and restrict the ability of companies and individuals to exchange Argentine pesos for foreign currencies. Those measures include, among other things, the requirement to obtain the prior approval from the Argentine Tax Authority of the foreign currency transaction (for example and without limitation, for the payment of non-Argentine goods and services, payment of principal and interest on non-Argentine debt and also payment of dividends to parties outside of the country), which approval process could delay, and eventually restrict, the ability to exchange Argentine pesos for other currencies, such as U.S. dollars. Those approvals are administered by the Argentine Central Bank through the Local Exchange Market (“Mercado Unico Libre de Cambios”, or “MULC”), which is the only market where exchange transactions may be lawfully made.

 

During January 2014 the Argentinean Peso exchange rate against the U.S. Dollar increased by approximately 23%, from 6.52 Argentinean Pesos per U.S. Dollar as of December 31, 2013 to approximately 8.0 Argentinean Pesos per U.S. Dollar. As of September 30, 2014, the Argentinean Peso exchange rate was 8.48 Argentine Pesos per U.S. Dollar.

 

Our international subsidiaries accounted for $71.3 million and $67.7 million or 9.4% and 12.7%, of our total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Latin America, including Argentina, has experienced adverse economic conditions.

 

Latin American countries have historically experienced uneven periods of economic growth, as well as recession, periods of high inflation and economic instability. Currently, as a consequence of adverse economic conditions in global markets and diminishing commodity prices, many of the economies of Latin American countries have slowed their rates of growth, and some have entered mild recessions. The duration and

 

69



Table of Contents

 

severity of this slowdown is hard to predict and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Additionally, certain countries have experienced or are currently experiencing severe economic crises, including Argentina, which may still have future effects.

 

During 2001 and 2002, Argentina went through a period of severe political, economic and social crisis. Among other consequences, the crisis resulted in the Argentine government defaulting on its foreign debt obligations, introducing emergency measures and numerous changes in economic policies that affected utilities and many other sectors of the economy, and suffering a significant real devaluation of the peso, which in turn caused numerous Argentine private sector debtors with foreign currency exposure to default on their outstanding debt.

 

In the first half of 2005, Argentina restructured part of the sovereign debt it defaulted; however, a number of creditors refused to approve the restructuring and litigation brought by these holdout creditors ensued. This litigation initiated by these holdout creditors has persisted to this day. On June 16, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an Argentine appeal and decided to leave in place a lower court ruling in favor on the holdout creditors, which held that the Argentine government is prohibited from making payments on its restructured debt unless it also pays the holdout creditors, who have previously refused to accept its debt restructuring offers, the amount owed to them.

 

In July 2014, Argentina and the holdout creditors failed to reach an agreement on the restructuring of this debt. As a result, the Argentine government was prohibited from making certain bond payments. The full consequences of this on Argentina’s political and economic landscape, and on the Company, are still unclear. We cannot provide any assurance that inflation, fluctuations in the value of the peso, the implementation of additional foreign currency restrictions and/or other future economic, social and political developments in Argentina resulting from this current Argentine sovereign debt crisis or the difficult economic conditions that current exist in Argentina, over which we have no control, will not adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, including our ability to pay our debts at maturity.

 

We are addressing a previous material weakness with respect to our internal controls and have identified two separate material weaknesses in our internal controls, which could, if not sufficiently remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

 

In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, we identified a material weakness in internal controls relating to the valuation of goodwill. We have taken steps since then to remediate the internal control weakness, such that at December 31, 2013, our controls over the valuation of goodwill operated effectively. During 2013, we continued to review the underlying assumptions and inputs to the valuation specialists, as well as reviewed the underlying schedules related to the output of the calculation of the impairment values. As we further optimize and refine our goodwill valuation processes, we will review the related controls and may take additional steps to ensure that they remain effective and are integrated appropriately. While we have implemented the procedures described above and will continue to take further steps in the near future to strengthen further our internal controls, there can be no assurance that we will not identify control deficiencies in the future or that such deficiencies will not have a material impact on our operating results or financial statements.

 

In addition, in March 2014, we identified two material weaknesses in our internal communications regarding the identification of and accounting for the loss contingency, along with the related disclosure regarding certain subpoenas we received in February, 2014, from the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health & Human Services.  We have taken steps since then to remediate the internal control weaknesses, such that at September 30, 2014, our controls over the identification and accounting for loss contingencies operated effectively. We implemented a system of internal controls over financial reporting with respect to the accounting for loss contingencies, including the establishment of a disclosure committee and the assessment of future probable loss contingency accounting and methods. While we have implemented the procedures described above and will continue to take further steps in the near future to strengthen further our internal controls, there can be no assurance that we will not identify control deficiencies in the future or that such deficiencies will not have a material impact on our operating results or financial statements.

 

70



Table of Contents

 

Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

On September 26, 2014, we issued to Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, in a private placement, an aggregate of 385,000 newly issued shares of our Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), for a purchase price of $325.0 million.

 

As further described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, a portion of the net proceeds from the Series A Preferred Stock was used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility, repay all obligations under the South Florida Radiation Oncology Term A, Term A-1, and Term B loans, repay certain other debt and capital leases, as well as provide capital for near-term strategic initiatives and general corporate purposes.

 

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4.     Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 5.     Other Information.

 

Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.

 

(a)               On August 25, 2014, Bryan J. Carey resigned as the President, Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman of the Company, as a member of the Company’s board of directors, and from the offices and directorships he held with the Company’s subsidiaries.  His resignation was not due to any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. On August 25, 2014, David Beckman was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company.  Since 2002, Mr. Beckman has served as a Senior Managing Director with FTI Consulting, Inc., a global business advisory firm.  Prior to FTI Consulting, Mr. Beckman was a partner in the U.S. division of PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Business Recovery Services practice.  Mr. Beckman was with PricewaterhouseCoopers from 1985 to 2002.  Mr. Beckman completed an M.S., A.B.T. in mineral economics and a B.S. in chemical and petroleum refining engineering from the Colorado School of Mines.  On November 25, 2014, the Company terminated its financial advisory and consulting agreement with FTI Consulting, Inc. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the agreement, effective as of December 26, 2014, David Beckman will no longer serve as the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer. Joseph Biscardi, the Company’s Senior Vice President, Assistant Treasurer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, will continue to serve as the Company’s principal financial officer. The functions of Chief Financial Officer will be filled by individuals with significant tenure at 21C, including Richard Lewis, Chief Financial Officer-US Operations (9 years), Mr. Biscardi (17 years), and Frank G. English IV, Vice President-International Finance and Treasurer (3 years) until such time as a new Chief Financial Officer is appointed.

 

On August 25, 2014, Brian F. Cassady was appointed as a member of the Company’s board of directors as result of the recapitalization support agreement.  On September 26, 2014, the Company, in connection with the issuance by the Company of its Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), entered into the Second Amended and Restated Securityholders Agreement, which, among other things, provides that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is to be comprised of, in part, two directors nominated by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock (the “Majority Preferred Holders”). In connection therewith, Brian Cassady and James H. Rubenstein resigned from the Board, effective September 26, 2014 and September 25, 2014, respectively, and Christian Hensley and Scott Lawrence, the Majority Preferred Holders’ nominees, were elected to the Board, effective September 26, 2014. Mr. Hensley has also been named to the Board’s Executive Committee, Audit/Compliance Committee and Capital Allocation Committee, and Mr. Lawrence has been named to the Compensation Committee.

 

As part of the Company’s overall plan for the cost-cutting and consolidation of corporate services and overhead, the Company has determined not to renew the office lease for its Great Neck, New York based legal department when the lease expires at the end of this year, and instead to relocate the legal department to its corporate headquarters in Ft. Myers, Florida. All key members of the legal department will be offered the opportunity to relocate to Ft. Myers. The Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Norton L. Travis, whose employment agreement provides that he will be based in New York and not be required to relocate, has advised the Company that, for personal and family reasons, he will not relocate to Ft. Myers. As a result, the Company and Mr. Travis have mutually agreed that effective as of December 31, 2014, Mr. Travis will resign as the Company’s Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and assume a new role as a consultant to the Company to assist in the transition of the Company’s legal services. The Company is extremely grateful for Mr. Travis’ many years of service, as well as his willingness to assist us in the consolidation and transition.

 

(b)                 None.

 

71



Table of Contents

 

Item 6.      Exhibits.

 

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

 

 

 

3.1

 

Certificate of Amendment, dated September 25, 2014, of the Certificate of Incorporation of 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014.

 

 

 

3.2

 

Certificate of Designation, dated September 26, 2014, of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014.

 

 

 

3.3

 

Amendment to Certificate of Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc, dated November 11, 2014.

 

 

 

10.1

 

Subscription Agreement, dated September 26, 2014, by and among 21st Century Oncology Investments, LLC, 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., 21st Century Oncology, Inc. and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014.

 

 

 

10.2

 

Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated effective September 26, 2014, of 21st Century Oncology Investments, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014.

 

 

 

10.3

 

Second Amended and Restated Securityholders Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2014, by and among 21st Century Oncology Investments, LLC, 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. and the other parties thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014.

 

 

 

10.4

 

Warrant Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014.

 

 

 

10.5

 

Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated September 26, 2014, by and among 21st Century Oncology, Inc., 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., 21st Century Oncology Investments, LLC and Vestar Capital Partners.

 

 

 

10.6

 

Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement.

 

 

 

10.7

 

Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, dated September 25, 2014, by and among 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Radiation Therapy Services Holdings, Inc., 21st Century Oncology, Inc. f/k/a Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. and Howard Sheridan, M.D.

 

 

 

10.8

 

Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated September 25, 2014, by and among 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. and Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014.

 

 

 

10.9

 

Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, dated September 24, 2014, by among 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Radiation Therapy Services Holdings, Inc., 21st Century Oncology, Inc. f/k/a Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. and James H. Rubenstein, M.D.

 

 

 

10.10

 

Second Amendment to Physician Employment Agreement, dated September 24, 2014, by and between 21st Century Oncology, LLC f/k/a 21st Century Oncology, Inc. and James H. Rubenstein, M.D.

 

 

 

10.11

 

Sixth Amendment to Physician’s Employment Agreement, dated August 2014, by and between 21st Century Oncology, LLC f/k/a 21st Century Oncology, Inc. and Eduardo Fernandez, M.D.

 

 

 

10.12

 

Amendment No. 8 to Physician’s Employment Agreement, dated July 2014, by and between 21st Century Oncology, LLC f/k/a 21st Century Oncology, Inc. and Constantine Mantz, M.D.

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

101

 

The following financial information from 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2014, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (iv) Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

72



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

 

 

 

Date:  February 5, 2015

 

 

 

By:

/s/ JOSEPH BISCARDI

 

 

Joseph Biscardi

 

 

SVP, Assistant Treasurer,

 

 

Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

 

73