1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 93 F.Supp.3d
  5. 93 F.Supp.3d 801 (2015)
 

IN RE BIOZOOM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Case No. 1:14-CV-01087.

93 F.Supp.3d 801 (2015)

In re BIOZOOM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio.

Signed February 26, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan L. Rosca , James P. Booker , Peiffer, Rosca, Wolf, Abdullah, Carr & Kane, Daniel R. Karon , Cleveland, OH, Joseph C. Peiffer , Peiffer, Rosca, Wolf, Abdullah, Carr & Kane, New Orleans, LA, Paul J. Scarlato , Goldman Scarlato & Karon, Wayne, PA, Brendan M. Mewhinney , Henderson & Schmidlin, Highland Heights, OH, for Plaintiff.

Joseph C. Lombard , Murphy & McGonigle, Washington, DC, Michael V. Rella , Murphy & McGonigle, Adam S. Hakki , Agnes Dunogue , Elizabeth Johnson Stewart , Shearman & Sterling, William J. Harrington , Goodwin Procter, Ian H. Hummel , Maxim Group, Ari J. Savitzky , Fraser L. Hunter, Jr. , David S. Lesser , Jamie S. Dycus , Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr, Barry M. Kazan , Richard A. De Palma , Thompson Hine, New York, NY, Brian J. Lamb , Thomas M. Ritzert , Thompson Hine, Jennifer D. Armstrong , William J. O'Neill , McDonald Hopkins , Hugh E. McKay , Tracey L. Turnbull , Tracy A.S. Francis, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, David H. Wallace , Michael J. Zbiegien, Jr. , Taft Stettinius & Hollister, Cleveland, OH, Brian E. Cohen , Donald A. Tarkington , Matthew J. Singer , Novack & Macey, Brett M. Doran , Steven M. Malina , Greenberg Traurig, Chicago, IL, Kurt A. Kappes , Greenberg Traurig, Sacramento, CA, Jeremy T. Kamras , Jonathan W. Hughes , Kenneth G. Hausman , Arnold & Porter, San Francisco, CA, Anthony S. Fiotto, Jr. , Goodwin Procter, Boston, MA, Russell S. Sayre , Aaron M. Herzig , Michael J. Zbiegien, Jr. , David H. Wallace , Taft Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, OH, Katharine Szczepanik Jones , Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr, Dayton, OH, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving Docs. 102, 103]

In this putative securities class action, Plaintiffs generally seek rescission or damages after the value of Biozoom securities that Plaintiffs had purchased collapsed. Plaintiffs purchased the stock in over-the-counter markets from market makers. Plaintiffs contend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases