EX-99.1 2 a11-11912_1ex99d1.htm EX-99.1

EXHIBIT 99.1

 

DANAOS CORPORATION

 

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

 

As described in detail below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) included elsewhere in this report, in the first quarter of 2011 we entered into a definitive agreement with our lenders, dated January 24, 2011 (the “Bank Agreement”) to restructure our existing indebtedness, as well as agreements for new financing arrangements. These agreements, among other things, provide for the funding of the remaining installment payments under our newbuilding contracts and amend our existing credit facilities.

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our interim condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

 

Results of Operations

 

Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to three months ended March 31, 2010

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we had an average of 51.0 containerships in our fleet. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we had an average of 41.5 containerships in our fleet.  Our fleet utilization was 96.7% in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 99.7% in the three months ended March 31, 2010. We took delivery of one 3,400 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Algeciras, on January 26, 2011 and one 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Germany, on March 10, 2011.

 

Operating Revenue

 

Operating revenue increased 24.2%, or $19.3 million, to $99.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $79.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily a result of the addition to our fleet of five 6,500 TEU containerships, the CMA CGM Nerval, the YM Mandate, the CMA CGM Rabelais, the CMA CGM Racine and the YM Maturity, on May 17, 2010, May 19, 2010, July 2, 2010, August 16, 2010 and August 18, 2010, respectively, four 3,400 TEU containerships, the Hanjin Buenos Aires, the Hanjin Santos, the Hanjin Versailles and the Hanjin Algeciras, on May 27, 2010, July 6, 2010, October 11, 2010 and January 26, 2011, respectively, as well as one 10,100 TEU containership, the Hanjin Germany, on March 10, 2011. These additions to our fleet contributed revenues of $23.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011. Moreover, a 6,500 TEU containership, the CMA CGM Musset, which was added to our fleet on March 12, 2010, contributed incremental revenues of $2.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. These revenues were offset in part by the sale of one 1,704 TEU containership, the MSC Eagle, on January 22, 2010, that contributed revenues of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to nil revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

We also had a reduction in revenues of $6.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011, mainly attributable to re-chartering of vessels at reduced charter hire rates, as well as more revenues lost due to scheduled off-hire in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 2010, which was partially offset by reduced charter hire in 2010, in relation to vessels laid up by our charterers (90 days and 614 days in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively), representing operating expenses not being incurred during the lay-up period.

 

Voyage Expenses

 

Voyage expenses increased 37.5%, or $0.6 million, to $2.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $1.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was the result of increases in various voyage expenses, such as port, commission and other expenses, due to the increased number of vessels in our fleet in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Vessel Operating Expenses

 

Vessel operating expenses increased 52.0%, or $9.1 million, to $26.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $17.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase is mainly attributable to the increased average number of vessels in our fleet during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, as well as increased costs of certain vessels, which were on lay-up for 90 days in the aggregate during the three months

 

1



 

ended March 31, 2011 compared to 614 days in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The average daily operating cost per vessel increased to $6,162 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $5,627 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (excluding those vessels on lay-up).

 

Depreciation

 

Depreciation expense increased 39.1%, or $6.3 million, to $22.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $16.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in depreciation expense was due to the increased average number of vessels in our fleet during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Impairment Loss

 

On March 31, 2010, we recorded an impairment loss of $71.5 million consisting of cash advances of $64.35 million paid to the shipyard and $7.16 million of capitalized interest and other predelivery capital expenditures paid in relation to the construction of three 6,500 TEU newbuilding containerships, the HN N-216, the HN N-217 and the HN N-218, following our agreement with Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co. Ltd. to cancel the construction of the respective newbuildings.

 

No impairment loss was recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

Amortization of Deferred Drydocking and Special Survey Costs

 

Amortization of deferred dry-docking and special survey costs decreased 11.8%, or $0.2 million, to $1.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $1.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

General and administrative expenses decreased 14.8%, or $0.8 million, to $4.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $5.4 million in the same period of 2010. The decrease was mainly the result of legal and advisory fees of $1.4 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2010, which was partially offset by increased fees of $0.5 million to our Manager in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, due to the increase in the average number of our vessels in our fleet.

 

Gain on Sale of Vessels

 

On January 22, 2010, we sold the MSC Eagle, a containership built in 1978 with a capacity of 1,704 TEU. The gross sale consideration was $4.6 million. We realized a net gain on this sale of $1.9 million.

 

No vessels were sold in the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

Interest Expense and Interest Income

 

Interest expense increased by 34.1%, or $3.0 million, to $11.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $8.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The change in interest expense was due to the increase in our average debt by $257.0 million, to $2,599.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $2,342.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, which was partially offset by the decrease in the margin over LIBOR payable as interest under our credit facilities in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, as contemplated by the Bank Agreement, which sets the margin at 1.85% (in relation to our credit facilities now governed by the Bank Agreement). Furthermore, the financing of our extensive newbuilding program resulted in interest capitalization, rather than such interest being recognized as an expense, of $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $7.2 million of capitalized interest for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Interest income increased by $0.1 million, to $0.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $0.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in interest income is attributable to increased interest rates to which our cash balances were subject during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, which was partially offset by lower average cash balances in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the 2010 period.

 

Other Finance Costs, Net

 

Other finance costs, net, increased by $3.9 million, to $4.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $0.5

 

2



 

million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase is mainly attributable to amortization of finance fees of $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (which were deferred and will be amortized over the life of the respective credit facilities) and $0.3 million of finance fees accrued related to our comprehensive financing plan, as well as an expense of $2.3 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to non-cash changes in fair value of warrants (for the period up to March 29, 2011 when the exercise price of the warrants was increased to $7.00 per share from the initial exercise price of $6.00 per share, refer to Note 6, Deferred Charges, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report).

 

Other Income/(Expenses), Net

 

Other income/(expenses), net, was an expense of $1.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from nil in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The $1.9 million increase is mainly attributable to legal and advisory fees of $2.1 million directly related to our comprehensive financing plan contemplated by the Bank Agreement, which were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

Loss on Fair value of Derivatives

 

Loss on fair value of derivatives decreased by $20.2 million, to a loss of $18.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from a loss of $38.5 million in the same period of 2010. The decrease is mainly attributable to non-cash gain in fair value of interest rate swaps of $9.8 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011, due to hedge accounting ineffectiveness, compared to a $22.5 million loss in the three months ended March 31, 2010, offset by a realized loss on interest rate swap hedges of $28.1 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011, which is mainly attributable to a higher average notional amount of swaps and reduced LIBOR payable on our credit facilities (subject to variable interest rates) against the LIBOR fixed through such swaps, compared to $16.0 million loss in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

In addition, realized losses on cash flow hedges of $9.9 million and $11.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were deferred in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss”, rather than being recognized as expenses, and will be reclassified into earnings over the depreciable lives of the vessels under construction, which are financed by loans for which their interest rates have been hedged by our interest rate swap contracts. The table below provides an analysis of the items discussed above, and were recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

 

 

Three months
ended

March 31,

 

Three months
ended

March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Gain/(loss) of non-cash changes in fair value of swaps

 

 

 

$

9.8

 

 

 

$

 (22.5

)

Total realized losses of swaps

 

(38.0

)

 

 

(27.7

)

 

 

Realized losses of swaps deferred in Other Comprehensive Loss

 

9.9

 

 

 

11.7

 

 

 

Realized losses of swaps expensed in Statement of Income

 

 

 

(28.1

)

 

 

(16.0

)

Loss on fair value of derivatives

 

 

 

$

 (18.3

)

 

 

$

(38.5

)

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our principal source of funds has been equity provided by our stockholders, operating cash flows, vessel sales, and long-term bank borrowings, as well as proceeds from our common stock sale in August 2010. Our principal uses of funds have been capital expenditures to establish, grow and maintain our fleet, comply with international shipping standards, environmental laws and regulations and to fund working capital requirements.

 

Our primary short-term liquidity needs are to fund our vessel operating expenses and loan interest payments. Our medium-term liquidity needs primarily relate to the purchase of the 13 additional containerships for which we have contracted, as of March 31, 2011, and for which we had scheduled future payments through the scheduled delivery of the final contracted vessel during 2012 aggregating approximately $1.0 billion as of March 31, 2011. Our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate to debt repayment and capital expenditures related to any further growth of our fleet. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds will be cash from our credit facilities and financing arrangements, cash from operations and equity or debt raised in the capital markets.

 

3



 

On January 24, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement (the “Bank Agreement”), which became effective on March 4, 2011, in respect of our existing financing arrangements (other than our credit facilities with the Export Import Bank of Korea (“KEXIM”) and with KEXIM and ABN Amro), and for new credit facilities (the “New Credit Facilities”) from certain of our current lenders aggregating $424.75 million, including $23.75 million under a bridge facility, which had already been advanced to us following the delivery of the CMA CGM Rabelais on July 2, 2010, and has been transferred to one of these New Credit Facilities. Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, among other things, under our existing bank debt facilities: the amortization and maturities were rescheduled, the interest rate margin was reduced, and the financial covenants, events of default, and guarantee and security packages were revised. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with the revised financial covenants under the Bank Agreement. Furthermore, on August 12, 2010, we entered into a supplemental agreement which set the financial covenants in our KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facility at the levels set forth in the Bank Agreement, and contemplated in the commitment letter therefore, effective from June 30, 2010 through June 30, 2012, and the interest rate margin was increased by 0.5 percentage points for the same period. Our KEXIM credit facility contains only a collateral coverage ratio covenant, with which we were in compliance as of March 31, 2011. In addition, on September 27, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Hyundai Samho Shipyard (the “Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing”) to finance 15%, or $190.0 million, of the aggregate purchase price of eight of our newbuilding containerships, and on February 21, 2011, we entered into a bank syndicate agreement, arranged by Citibank and led by the Export-Import Bank of China (“CEXIM”) for a new $203.4 million credit facility (the “Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility”), in respect of which the China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (or Sinosure) will cover certain risks, as well as guarantee our obligations in certain circumstances. We believe that continued future compliance with the terms of these agreements will allow us to fund the remaining installment payments under our newbuilding contracts and satisfy our other liquidity needs. See Note 10, Long-term Debt, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for a more detailed description of the Bank Agreement and the Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility.

 

As of March 31, 2011, the remaining capital expenditure installments for our 13 newbuilding vessels were approximately $558.1 million for the remainder of 2011 and $450.8 million for 2012. As of March 31, 2011, we expect to fund the remaining installment payments of approximately $1.0 billion with undrawn borrowing capacity under our existing credit facilities of $93.1 million and with undrawn borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facilities with certain of our existing lenders of $354.5 million, under the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing of $168.3 million and under the Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility of $203.4 million, as well as with the proceeds from the 2010 equity transaction remaining available under cash and cash equivalents.

 

Under our existing multi-year charters as of March 31, 2011, we have contracted revenues of $360.5 million for the remainder of 2011, $559.8 million for 2012 and, thereafter, approximately $4.9 billion, of which amounts $63.3 million, $205.0 million and $2.5 billion, respectively, are associated with charters for our contracted newbuildings. Although these expected revenues are based on contracted charter rates, we are dependent on our charterers’ ability and willingness to meet their obligations under these charters.

 

On March 2, 2011, we committed to issue 15,000,000 warrants to our lenders under the Bank Agreement and the New Credit Facilities to purchase, solely on a cashless exercise basis, shares of our common stock. On March 17, 2011, we issued 11,213,713 warrants at an initial exercise price of $6.00 per share, which exercise price was increased to $7.00 per share on March 29, 2011 upon the delivery of certain documents, as required by the Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility and related arrangement with Sinosure. On April 1, 2011, we issued an additional 3,711,417 warrants (part of the 15,000,000 warrants described above) with an exercise price of $7.00 per share, resulting in an aggregate of 14,925,130 warrants issued to our lenders. We will issue the remaining 74,870 warrants upon the request of the applicable lender. All warrants issued, or to be issued, will expire on January 31, 2019. We will not receive any cash upon exercise of the warrants as the warrants are only exercisable on a cashless basis. We have also agreed to register the warrants and underlying shares of common stock for resale under the Securities Act.

 

As of March 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $131.9 million. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $819.3 million undrawn under our credit facilities. As of March 31, 2011, we had $2.6 billion of outstanding indebtedness, of which only $21.6 million was payable within the next twelve months. Under the Bank Agreement, no principal payments are scheduled to be due before March 31, 2013. After that time, however, we are required under the Bank Agreement to apply a substantial portion of our cash from operations to the repayment of principal under our financing arrangements, and limits our ability to incur additional indebtedness without our lenders’ consent. The Bank Agreement also contains requirements for the application of proceeds from any future vessel sales or financings, as well as other transactions. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2011, as well as Note 10, Long-term Debt, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

 

Our board of directors determined in 2009 to suspend the payment of further cash dividends as a result of market conditions in the international shipping industry and in order to conserve cash to be applied toward the financing of our extensive new building program. In addition, under the Bank Agreement and the Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility, we are not permitted to

 

4



 

pay cash dividends or repurchase shares of our capital stock unless (i) our consolidated net leverage is below 6:1 for two consecutive quarters (four consecutive quarters under our Sinosure-CEXIM credit faciity) and (ii) the ratio of the aggregate market value of our vessels to our outstanding indebtedness exceeds 125% for four consecutive quarters and provided that an event of default has not occurred and we are not, and after giving effect to the payment of the dividend, in breach of any covenant.

 

Cash Flows

 

Net Cash (Used in)/Provided by Operating Activities

 

Net cash flows (used in)/provided by operating activities decreased by $31.3 million, to $15.5 million used in operating activities in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $15.8 million provided by operating activities in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily the result of increased interest cost of $13.3 million (including realized losses on our interest rate swaps), an unfavorable change in the working capital position and reduced cash from operations of $13.4 million, following the cash settlement of all legal, advisory, bank fees and retrospective waiver margin and fees in relation to our previously existing Aegean Baltic Bank-HSH Nordbank-Piraeus Bank facility agreement and our Bank Agreement (see Note 10, Long-term Debt to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for a more detailed description of our Bank Agreement fees paid in the three months ended March 31, 2011), as well as increased payments for drydocking of $4.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

 

Net cash flows used in investing activities increased by $47.4 million, to $121.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $73.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The difference reflects installment payments for newbuildings, as well as interest capitalized and other related capital expenditures, of $121.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $75.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and proceeds from sale of vessels of nil in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

 

Net cash flows provided by financing activities decreased by $1.8 million, to $38.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $40.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease is primarily due to the deferred fees paid to our lenders under the Bank Agreement of $30.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 (refer to our condensed consolidated financial statements Note 10, Long-term Debt, included elsewhere in this report) compared to nil in the three months ended March 31, 2010, which was partially offset by increased net proceeds from long-term debt of $66.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $38.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Management believes, however, that certain non-GAAP financial measures used in managing the business may provide users of this financial information additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior operating periods. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures can provide additional meaningful reflection of underlying trends of the business because they provide a comparison of historical information that excludes certain items that impact the overall comparability. Management also uses these non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operating and planning decisions and in evaluating our performance. See the tables below for supplemental financial data and corresponding reconciliations to GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

 

EBITDA represents net (loss)/income before interest income and expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents net (loss)/income before interest income and expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization of deferred drydocking & special survey costs and deferred finance costs (and write-offs), impairment loss, gain/(loss) on sale of vessels, non-cash changes in fair value of derivatives, realized gain/(loss) on derivatives, gain on contract termination and other one-off items in relation to the Company’s Comprehensive Financing Plan. We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA assist investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance and because they are used by certain investors to measure a company’s ability to service and/or incur indebtedness, pay capital expenditures and meet working capital requirements. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are also used: (i) by prospective and current customers as well as potential lenders to evaluate

 

5



 

potential transactions; and (ii) to evaluate and price potential acquisition candidates. Our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by other companies due to differences in methods of calculation.

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are: (i) EBITDA/Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; and (ii) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA/Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such capital expenditures. In evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in this presentation. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. Because of these limitations, EBITDA/Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as principal indicators of our performance.

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Income/(Loss)

 

 

 

Three Months
 ended
March 31,

 

Three Months
ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net income/(loss)

 

$

5,443

 

$

(79,765

)

Depreciation

 

22,436

 

16,061

 

Amortization of deferred drydocking & special survey costs

 

1,530

 

1,740

 

Amortization of finance costs

 

1,279

 

320

 

Finance costs accrued (under our Bank Agreement)

 

341

 

 

Interest income

 

(353

)

(249

)

Interest expense

 

11,848

 

8,776

 

EBITDA

 

$

42,524

 

$

(53,117

)

Impairment loss

 

 

71,509

 

Gain on sale of vessel

 

 

(1,916

)

Comprehensive Financing Plan related fees(1)

 

2,089

 

1,048

 

Stock based compensation

 

23

 

27

 

Non-cash changes in fair value of warrants

 

2,253

 

 

Realized loss on derivatives

 

28,109

 

16,046

 

Non-cash changes in fair value of derivatives

 

(9,820

)

22,450

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

65,178

 

$

56,047

 

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Cash (Used in)/Provided by Operating Activities

 

 

 

Three Months
 ended
March 31,

 

Three Months
 ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

 

$

(15,529

)

$

15,772

 

Net increase/(decrease) in current and non-current assets

 

3,517

 

2,979

 

Net (increase)/decrease in current and non-current liabilities

 

20,685

 

(320

)

Net interest

 

11,495

 

8,527

 

Payments for dry-docking/special survey

 

4,902

 

258

 

Gain on sale of vessel

 

 

1,916

 

Stock based compensation

 

(23

)

(27

)

Impairment loss

 

 

(71,509

)

Change in fair value of warrants

 

(2,253

)

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

19,730

 

(10,713

)

EBITDA

 

$

42,524

 

$

(53,117

)

Impairment loss

 

 

71,509

 

Gain on sale of vessels

 

 

(1,916

)

Comprehensive Financing Plan related fees(1)

 

2,089

 

1,048

 

Stock based compensation

 

23

 

27

 

Non-cash changes in fair value of warrants

 

2,253

 

 

Realized loss on derivatives

 

28,109

 

16,046

 

Non-cash changes in fair value of derivatives

 

(9,820

)

22,450

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

65,178

 

$

56,047

 

 

6



 


(1)                              Fees related to our Comprehensive Financing Plan, of which $2.1 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which were recorded in “Other income/(expense), net” and “General and administrative expenses”, respectively.

 

EBITDA increased by $95.6 million, to $42.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $(53.1) million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase is mainly attributable to increased operating revenues of $99.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $79.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, an impairment loss of $71.5 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2010, reduced losses on fair value of derivatives of $18.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $38.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, which were partially offset by increased operating expenses of $26.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $17.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, a gain on sale of vessel of $1.9 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as well as increased other finance costs of $2.8 million (excluding amortization of deferred finance costs of $1.3 million and finance costs accrued of $0.3 million) in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $0.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and other expenses of $1.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to nil in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Adjusted EBITDA increased by $9.2 million, to $65.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $56.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase is mainly attributed to increased operating revenues of $99.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $79.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, which was partially offset by increased operating expenses of $26.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $17.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and increased voyage expenses of $2.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $1.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Credit Facilities

 

We, as borrower, and certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors, have entered into a number of credit facilities in connection with financing the acquisition of certain vessels in our fleet, which are described in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report. Under the Bank Agreement our previously existing credit facilities continue to be made available by the respective lenders, in all cases as term loans, but (other than with respect to our KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities which are not covered by the Bank Agreement) with revised amortization schedules, interest rates, financial covenants, events of default and other terms and additional collateral under certain of these credit facilities and we obtained new credit facilities. The following summarizes certain terms of our previously existing credit facilities, as amended, as well as the new credit facilities we have entered into in the first quarter of 2011:

 

Lender

 

Remaining
Available
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Outstanding
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Collateral Vessels

Previously Existing Credit Facilities

The Royal Bank of Scotland(2)

 

$

47.0

 

$

639.8

 

Mortgages for existing vessels and refund guarantees for newbuildings relating to the Hyundai Progress, the Hyundai Highway, the Hyundai Bridge, the Hyundai Federal (ex APL Confidence), the Zim Monaco, the Hanjin Buenos Aires, the Hanjin Versailles, the Hanjin Algeciras, the CMA CGM Racine and the HN H1022A

 

7



 

Lender

 

Remaining
Available
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Outstanding
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Collateral Vessels

Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank(3)(4)

 

$

 

$

664.3

 

Jiangshu Dragon (ex CMA CGM Elbe), the California Dragon (ex CMA CGM Kalamata, the Shenzhen Dragon (ex CMA CGM Komodo), the Henry (ex CMA CGM Passiflore), the MOL Affinity (ex Hyundai Commodore), the Hyundai Duke, the Independence (ex CMA CGM Vanille), the Marathonas (ex Maersk Marathon), the Maersk Messologi, the Maersk Mytilini, the YM Yantian, the M/V Honour (ex Al Rayyan), the SCI Pride (ex YM Milano), the Lotus (ex CMA CGM Lotus), the Hyundai Vladivostok, the Hyundai Advance, the Hyundai Stride, the Hyundai Future, the Hyundai Sprinter and Hanjin Montreal

Emporiki Bank of Greece S.A.

 

$

 

$

156.8

 

CMA CGM Moliere and CMA CGM Musset

Deutsche Bank

 

$

 

$

180.0

 

Zim Rio Grande, the Zim Sao Paolo and Zim Kingston

Credit Suisse

 

$

 

$

221.1

 

Zim Luanda, CMA CGM Nerval and YM Mandate

ABN Amro—Lloyds TSB—National Bank of Greece

 

$

 

$

253.2

 

YM Colombo, YM Seattle, YM Vancouver and YM Singapore

Deutsche Schiffsbank—Credit Suisse—Emporiki Bank

 

$

46.1

 

$

252.4

 

ZIM Dalian, Hanjin Santos and YM Maturity and assignment of refund guarantees and newbuilding contracts relating to the HN N-223 and the HN Z0001

HSH Nordbank

 

$

 

$

35.0

 

Deva (ex Bunga Raya Tujuh) and the Bunga Raya Tiga (ex Maersk Derby)

KEXIM

 

$

 

$

57.5

 

CSCL Europe and the CSCL America (ex MSC Baltic)

KEXIM-ABN Amro

 

$

 

$

96.2

 

CSCL Pusan and the CSCL Le Havre

New Credit Facilities

Aegean Baltic-HSH Nordbank-Piraeus Bank(5)(6)

 

$

100.0

 

$

23.8

 

HN S459, Hanjin Italy and the CMA CGM Rabelais

RBS(5)

 

$

53.5

 

$

46.5

 

HN S458 and Hanjin Germany

ABN Amro Club Facility(5)

 

$

37.1

 

$

 

Hanjin Greece

Club Facility(5)

 

$

83.9

 

$

 

HNS456 and HN S457

Citi- Eurobank(5)

 

$

80.0

 

$

 

HN S460

Sinosure-CEXIM(7)

 

$

203.4

 

$

 

Hull No. Z00002, Hull No. Z00003 and Hull No. Z00004

Hyundai Samho Vendor

 

$

168.3

 

$

21.7

 

Second priority liens on Hulls No. S456, S457, S458, S459, S460, Hanjin Germany, Hanjin Italy and Hanjin Greece.

 


(1)                                  As of March 31, 2011.

 

(2)                                 Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Bunga Raya Tiga, the CSCL America (ex MSC Baltic) and the CSCL Le Havre.

 

8



 

(3)                                  As of July 10, 2009, we agreed to amend the facility by adding additional collateral as follows: (a) newbuilding vessel CMA CGM Rabelais to be provided as first priority security under the facility, (b) second priority mortgages on the Bunga Raya Tujuh (ex Maersk Deva) and the Bunga Raya Tiga (ex Maersk Derby) financed by Aegean Baltic-HSH Nordbank AG-Pireaus Bank and Dresdner Bank and (c) second priority mortgages on the CSCL Europe and the CSCL America (ex MSC Baltic) financed by KEXIM credit facility and the CSCL Pusan (ex HN 1559) and the CSCL Le Havre (ex HN 1561) financed by our KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facility.

 

(4)                              Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Bunga Raya Tujuh, the CSCL Europe and the CSCL Pusan.

 

(5)                                  As of January 24, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement with the respective banks.

 

(6)                                  Includes principal amount of $23.75 million under the Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank credit facility as of December 31, 2010 (following a scheduled payment of $1.25 million as of December 31, 2010), which will be transferred to the new facility from a bridge financing facility and was drawn down ($25.0 million) on July 1, 2010 for the delivery of the vessel CMA CGM Rabelais on July 2, 2010.

 

(7)                                  As of February 21, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement for this facility.

 

For additional details regarding the Bank Agreement, the New Credit Facilities with existing lenders, Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility and Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing, please refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2011, as well as Note 10, Long-term Debt, to our condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) included elsewhere herein.

 

Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

We have entered into interest rate swap agreements converting floating interest rate exposure into fixed interest rates in order to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in prevailing market interest rates, as well as interest rate swap agreements converting the fixed rate we pay in connection with certain of our credit facilities into floating interest rates in order to economically hedge the fair value of the fixed rate credit facilities against fluctuations in prevailing market interest rates. Due to the changes to the amortization profiles and interest rates under our existing credit facilities pursuant to the terms of the Bank Agreement, our interest rate swap agreements are expected to have a greater degree of ineffectiveness as hedging instruments with the result that changes in the fair value of such ineffective portion of such swap arrangements would be recognized in our statement of income. See Note 11, Financial Instruments, to our condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) included in this report. We do not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

 

We are currently in an over-hedged position under our cash flow interest rate swaps, which is due to deferred progress payments to shipyards, cancellation of three newbuildings in 2010, replacements of variable interest rate debt with a fixed interest rate seller’s financing and equity proceeds from our private placement in 2010, all of which reduced initial forecasted variable interest rate debt and resulted in notional cash flow interest rate swaps being above our variable interest rate debt eligible for hedging. Realized losses attributable to the over-hedging position were $9.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $4.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

 

We did not enter into derivative instruments to hedge the foreign currency translation of assets or liabilities or foreign currency transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered material off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

Capitalization

 

The table below sets forth our consolidated capitalization as of March 31, 2011:

 

·          on an actual basis; and

 

9



 

·          on an as adjusted basis to reflect in the period from March 31, 2011 to May 9, 2011 debt drawdowns of $172.9 million, of which $43.4 million relates to the Hyundai Samho Vendor financing and the issuance of 375,835 shares of common stock to the employees of our manager in respect of equity awards granted in 2010.

 

Other than these adjustments, there have been no material changes to our capitalization from debt or equity issuances, re-capitalizations or special dividends as adjusted in the table below between March 31, 2011 and May 9, 2011.  This table should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) and the notes thereto included in this report.

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2011

 

 

 

Actual

 

As Adjusted

 

 

 

(US Dollars in thousands)

 

Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt(1)

 

$

2,652,558

 

$

2,825,436

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock (par value $0.01, 100,000,000 preferred shares authorized and none issued; actual and as adjusted)

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 108,626,538 shares issued and outstanding actual; 109,002,373 shares issued and outstanding as adjusted(2)(3)

 

1,086

 

1,090

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

543,735

 

543,731

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(413,684

)

(413,684

)

Retained earnings

 

343,666

 

343,666

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

474,803

 

474,803

 

Total capitalization

 

$

3,127,361

 

$

3,300,239

 

 


(1)          All of our indebtedness is secured

 

(2)          Does not include 15 million warrants to purchase shares of common stock, at an initial exercise price of $7.00 per share, which we have agreed to issue to lenders participating in our comprehensive financing plan, of which 14,925,130 warrants had been issued as of May 9, 2011.  The warrants, which will expire on January 31, 2019, are exercisable solely on a cashless exercise basis.

 

(3)          We have agreed to issue in 2011 an additional 22,015 shares of common stock to employees of our manager in respect of equity awards granted in 2010.

 

Recent Developments

 

On April 1, 2011, we issued 3,711,417 warrants (from the total 15,000,000 committed warrants), to one of our lenders under the Bank Agreement and the New Credit Facilities to purchase, solely on a cash-less exercise basis, shares of common stock, which warrants have an exercise price of $7.00 per share (subject to antidilutive adjustments). We will issue the remaining 74,870 warrants upon the request of the applicable lender. All warrants issued, or to be issued, will expire on January 31, 2019.

 

Between April 1, 2011 and May 5, 2011, we issued 375,835 new shares to the employees of the Manager (in respect of grants made in 2010) and we agreed to issue in 2011 an additional 22,015 new shares of common stock to employees of the Manager in respect of the same grants.

 

On April 6, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Italy. The vessel has been deployed on a 12-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

On April 15, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 3,400 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Constantza. The vessel has been deployed on a 10-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

On May 4, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Greece. The vessel has been deployed on a 12-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

Matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance and may include statements

 

10



 

concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. The forward-looking statements in this report are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that it will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the strength of world economies and currencies, general market conditions, including changes in charterhire rates and vessel values, charter counterparty performance,  ability to obtain financing and comply with covenants contained in our financing agreements, shipyard performance, changes in demand that may affect attitudes of time charterers to scheduled and unscheduled drydocking, changes in our operating expenses, including bunker prices, dry-docking and insurance costs, actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents and political events or acts by terrorists.

 

Risks and uncertainties are further described in reports filed by us with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

11



 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010

F-2

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)

F-3

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)

F-4

 

 

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

F-5

 

F-1



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars, except share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

 

Notes

 

March 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2010

 

 

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

$

131,850

 

$

229,835

 

Restricted cash

 

3

 

95

 

2,907

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

 

3,500

 

4,112

 

Inventories

 

 

 

10,745

 

9,918

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

 

625

 

1,424

 

Due from related parties

 

 

 

10,719

 

11,106

 

Other current assets

 

 

 

9,616

 

7,528

 

Total current assets

 

 

 

167,150

 

266,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed assets, net

 

4

 

2,465,752

 

2,273,483

 

Advances for vessels under construction

 

5

 

824,973

 

904,421

 

Deferred charges, net

 

6

 

109,953

 

24,692

 

Other non-current assets

 

11b,7

 

21,497

 

19,704

 

Total non-current assets

 

 

 

3,422,175

 

3,222,300

 

Total assets

 

 

 

$

3,589,325

 

$

3,489,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

 

 

$

16,051

 

$

14,748

 

Accrued liabilities

 

8

 

38,836

 

70,702

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

10

 

21,619

 

21,619

 

Unearned revenue

 

 

 

8,776

 

9,681

 

Other current liabilities

 

9

 

134,507

 

129,747

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

 

219,789

 

246,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

 

 

2,630,939

 

2,543,907

 

Unearned revenue, net of current portion

 

 

 

1,168

 

1,716

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

9,11a

 

262,626

 

304,598

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

 

2,894,733

 

2,850,221

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

3,114,522

 

3,096,718

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock (par value $.01, 100,000,000 preferred shares authorized and not issued as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010)

 

13

 

 

 

Common stock (par value $0.01, 750,000,000 common shares authorized. 108,626,538 issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2011. 108,611,555 issued and 108,610,921 outstanding as of December 31, 2010)

 

13

 

1,086

 

1,086

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

 

543,735

 

489,672

 

Treasury stock

 

13

 

 

(3

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

11a,14

 

(413,684

)

(436,566

)

Retained earnings

 

 

 

343,666

 

338,223

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

474,803

 

392,412

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

$

3,589,325

 

$

3,489,130

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-2



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

 

 

Notes

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING REVENUES

 

 

 

$

98,989

 

$

79,659

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voyage expenses

 

 

 

(2,218

)

(1,586

)

Vessel operating expenses

 

 

 

(26,602

)

(17,546

)

Depreciation

 

4

 

(22,436

)

(16,061

)

Impairment loss

 

17

 

 

(71,509

)

Amortization of deferred drydocking and special survey costs

 

6

 

(1,530

)

(1,740

)

General and administration expenses

 

 

 

(4,629

)

(5,372

)

Gain on sale of vessels

 

16

 

 

1,916

 

Income From Operations

 

 

 

41,574

 

(32,239

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

 

353

 

249

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

(11,848

)

(8,776

)

Other finance costs, net

 

 

 

(4,427

)

(490

)

Other income/(expenses), net

 

 

 

(1,920

)

(13

)

Loss on fair value of derivatives

 

11

 

(18,289

)

(38,496

)

Total Other Income/(Expenses), net

 

 

 

(36,131

)

(47,526

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income/(Loss)

 

 

 

$

5,443

 

$

(79,765

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted net income/(loss) per share

 

15

 

$

0.05

 

$

(1.46

)

Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares

 

 

 

108,611

 

54,549

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-3



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

(Expressed in thousands of United States Dollars)

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

 

$

5,443

 

$

(79,765

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

22,436

 

16,061

 

Impairment loss

 

 

71,509

 

Amortization of deferred drydocking and special survey costs

 

1,530

 

1,740

 

Amortization of finance and other costs

 

1,279

 

320

 

Finance costs accrued (under the Bank Agreement)

 

341

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

23

 

27

 

Payments for drydocking/special survey

 

(4,902

)

(258

)

Gain on sale of vessel

 

 

(1,916

)

Increase in fair value of warrants

 

2,253

 

 

(Decrease)/increase in fair value of derivative instruments

 

(19,730

)

10,713

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase)/Decrease in

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

612

 

(814

)

Inventories

 

(827

)

(275

)

Prepaid expenses

 

799

 

(108

)

Due from related parties

 

387

 

368

 

Other assets, current and long-term

 

(4,488

)

(2,150

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/(Decrease) in

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

732

 

(366

)

Accrued liabilities

 

(20,010

)

(879

)

Unearned revenue, current and long term

 

(1,453

)

(987

)

Other liabilities, current and long-term

 

46

 

2,552

 

Net Cash (used in)/provided by Operating Activities

 

(15,529

)

15,772

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Vessels under construction

 

(121,322

)

(75,631

)

Net proceeds from sale of vessels

 

 

1,764

 

Net Cash used in Investing Activities

 

(121,322

)

(73,867

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from long-term debt

 

98,238

 

57,860

 

Payments of long-term debt

 

(31,967

)

(19,892

)

Deferred finance costs

 

(30,217

)

 

Treasury stock

 

 

(50

)

Decrease of restricted cash

 

2,812

 

2,812

 

Net Cash provided by Financing Activities

 

38,866

 

40,730

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(97,985

)

(17,365

)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period

 

229,835

 

122,050

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period

 

$

131,850

 

$

104,685

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplementary Cash Flow information

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash capitalized interest in vessels under construction

 

$

791

 

$

4,417

 

Non-cash other predelivery expenses in vessels under construction

 

$

1,363

 

$

 

Deferred financing fees accrued (including warrants)

 

$

56,456

 

$

 

Progress payments of vessels under construction accrued

 

$

 

$

35,250

 

Progress payments of vessels under construction financed by Vendor

 

$

21,715

 

$

 

 

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1                 Basis of Presentation and General Information

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The reporting and functional currency of the Company is the United States Dollar.

 

Danaos Corporation (“Danaos”), formerly Danaos Holdings Limited, was formed on December 7, 1998 under the laws of Liberia and is presently the sole owner of all outstanding shares of the companies listed below. Danaos Holdings Limited was redomiciled in the Marshall Islands on October 7, 2005. In connection with the redomiciliation, the Company changed its name to Danaos Corporation. On October 14, 2005, the Company filed and the Marshall Islands accepted Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. Under the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, the authorized capital stock of Danaos Corporation increased to 100,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 and 1,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. On September 18, 2006, the Company filed and Marshall Islands accepted Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. Under the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, the authorized capital stock of Danaos Corporation increased to 200,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. On September 18, 2009, the Company filed and Marshall Islands accepted Articles of Amendment. Under the Articles of Amendment, the authorized capital stock of Danaos Corporation increased to 750,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. On August 6, 2010, the Company entered into agreements with several investors, including its largest stockholder, to sell to them 54,054,055 shares of its Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200.0 million in cash. Refer to Note 13, Stockholders’ Equity.

 

Between March 29, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company issued 15,617 shares, of which 14,983 were newly issued shares and 634 were treasury shares to the employees of the Manager and directors of the Company and the Company has agreed to issue in 2011 an additional 382,261 new shares of common stock to employees of the Manager in respect of grants made in 2010 (refer to Note 13, Stockholders’ Equity). As of March 31, 2011, the shares issued and outstanding were 108,626,538.

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) of Danaos and subsidiaries contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, Danaos’s consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2011, the consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and the consolidated cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. All such adjustments are deemed to be of a normal, recurring nature. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Danaos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

 

The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The Company’s principal business is the acquisition and operation of vessels. Danaos conducts its operations through the vessel owning companies whose principal activity is the ownership and operation of containerships that are under the exclusive management of a related party of the Company.

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) represent the consolidation of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Company. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. Inter-company transaction balances and unrealized gains on transactions between the companies are eliminated.

 

The Company also consolidates entities that are determined to be variable interest entities as defined in the authoritative guidance under U.S. GAAP. A variable interest entity is defined as a legal entity where either (a) equity interest holders as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including decision making ability and an interest in the entity’s residual risks and rewards, or (b) the equity holders have not provided sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (c) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or both and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.

 

F-5



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

1                 Basis of Presentation and General Information (continued)

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) have been prepared to reflect the consolidation of the companies listed below. The historical balance sheets and results of operations of the companies listed below have been reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity at and for each period since their respective incorporation dates.

 

The consolidated companies are referred to as “Danaos,” or “the Company.”

 

As of March 31, 2011, Danaos included the vessel owning (including vessels under contract and/or construction) companies (the “Danaos Subsidiaries”) listed below. All vessels are container vessels:

 

Company

 

Date of Incorporation

 

Vessel Name

 

Year
Built

 

TEU

Deleas Shipping Ltd.

 

July 29, 1987

 

Hanjin Montreal

 

1984

 

2,130

Seasenator Shipping Ltd.

 

June 11, 1996

 

M/V Honour

 

1989

 

3,908

Seacaravel Shipping Ltd.

 

June 11, 1996

 

YM Yantian

 

1989

 

3,908

Appleton Navigation S.A.

 

May 12, 1998

 

Shenzhen Dragon

 

1991

 

2,917

Geoffrey Shipholding Ltd.

 

September 22, 1997

 

California Dragon

 

1991

 

2,917

Lacey Navigation Inc.

 

March 5, 1998

 

Jiangsu Dragon

 

1991

 

2,917

Saratoga Trading S.A.

 

May 8, 1998

 

SCI Pride

 

1988

 

3,129

Tyron Enterprises S.A.

 

January 26, 1999

 

Henry

 

1986

 

3,039

Independence Navigation Inc.

 

October 9, 2002

 

Independence

 

1986

 

3,045

Victory Shipholding Inc.

 

October 9, 2002

 

Lotus

 

1988

 

3,098

Duke Marine Inc.

 

April 14, 2003

 

Hyundai Duke

 

1992

 

4,651

Commodore Marine Inc.

 

April 14, 2003

 

Hyundai Commodore

 

1992

 

4,651

Containers Services Inc.

 

May 30, 2002

 

Deva

 

2004

 

4,253

Containers Lines Inc.

 

May 30, 2002

 

Bunga Raya Tiga

 

2004

 

4,253

Oceanew Shipping Ltd.

 

January 14, 2002

 

CSCL Europe

 

2004

 

8,468

Oceanprize Navigation Ltd.

 

January 21, 2003

 

CSCL America

 

2004

 

8,468

Federal Marine Inc.

 

February 14, 2006

 

Hyunday Federal

 

1994

 

4,651

Karlita Shipping Co. Ltd.

 

February 27, 2003

 

CSCL Pusan

 

2006

 

9,580

Ramona Marine Co. Ltd.

 

February 27, 2003

 

CSCL Le Havre

 

2006

 

9,580

Boxcarrier (No. 6) Corp.

 

June 27, 2006

 

Marathonas

 

1991

 

4,814

Boxcarrier (No. 7) Corp.

 

June 27, 2006

 

Maersk Messologi

 

1991

 

4,814

Boxcarrier (No. 8) Corp.

 

November 16, 2006

 

Maersk Mytilini

 

1991

 

4,814

Auckland Marine Inc.

 

January 27, 2005

 

YM Colombo

 

2004

 

4,300

Seacarriers Services Inc.

 

June 28, 2005

 

YM Seattle

 

2007

 

4,253

Speedcarrier (No. 1) Corp.

 

June 28, 2007

 

Hyundai Vladivostok

 

1997

 

2,200

Speedcarrier (No. 2) Corp.

 

June 28, 2007

 

Hyundai Advance

 

1997

 

2,200

Speedcarrier (No. 3) Corp.

 

June 28, 2007

 

Hyundai Stride

 

1997

 

2,200

Speedcarrier (No. 5) Corp.

 

June 28, 2007

 

Hyundai Future

 

1997

 

2,200

Speedcarrier (No. 4) Corp.

 

June 28, 2007

 

Hyundai Sprinter

 

1997

 

2,200

Wellington Marine Inc.

 

January 27, 2005

 

YM Singapore

 

2004

 

4,300

Seacarriers Lines Inc.

 

June 28, 2005

 

YM Vancouver

 

2007

 

4,253

Speedcarrier (No. 7) Corp.

 

December 6, 2007

 

Hyundai Highway

 

1998

 

2,200

Speedcarrier (No. 6) Corp.

 

December 6, 2007

 

Hyundai Progress

 

1998

 

2,200

Speedcarrier (No. 8) Corp.

 

December 6, 2007

 

Hyundai Bridge

 

1998

 

2,200

Bayview Shipping Inc.

 

March 22, 2006

 

Zim Rio Grande

 

2008

 

4,253

Channelview Marine Inc.

 

March 22, 2006

 

Zim Sao Paolo

 

2008

 

4,253

Balticsea Marine Inc.

 

March 22, 2006

 

Zim Kingston

 

2008

 

4,253

Continent Marine Inc.

 

March 22, 2006

 

Zim Monaco

 

2009

 

4,253

Medsea Marine Inc.

 

May 8, 2006

 

Zim Dalian

 

2009

 

4,253

Blacksea Marine Inc.

 

May 8, 2006

 

Zim Luanda

 

2009

 

4,253

Boxcarrier (No. 1) Corp.

 

June 27, 2006

 

CMA CGM Moliere(1)

 

2009

 

6,500

Boxcarrier (No. 2) Corp.

 

June 27, 2006

 

CMA CGM Musset(1)

 

2010

 

6,500

Boxcarrier (No. 3) Corp.

 

June 27, 2006

 

CMA CGM Nerval(1)

 

2010

 

6,500

Boxcarrier (No. 4) Corp.

 

June 27, 2006

 

CMA CGM Rabelais(1)

 

2010

 

6,500

Boxcarrier (No. 5) Corp.

 

June 27, 2006

 

CMA CGM Racine(1)

 

2010

 

6,500

Expresscarrier (No. 1) Corp.

 

March 5, 2007

 

YM Mandate

 

2010

 

6,500

Expresscarrier (No. 2) Corp.

 

March 5, 2007

 

YM Maturity

 

2010

 

6,500

 

F-6



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Company

 

Date of Incorporation

 

Vessel Name

 

Year
Built

 

TEU

CellContainer (No. 1) Corp.

 

March 23, 2007

 

Hanjin Buenos Aires

 

2010

 

3,400

CellContainer (No. 2) Corp.

 

March 23, 2007

 

Hanjin Santos

 

2010

 

3,400

CellContainer (No. 3) Corp.

 

March 23, 2007

 

Hanjin Versailles

 

2010

 

3,400

CellContainer (No. 4) Corp.

 

March 23, 2007

 

Hanjin Algeciras

 

2011

 

3,400

Cellcontainer (No. 6) Corp.

 

October 31, 2007

 

Hanjin Germany

 

2011

 

10,100

 

Vessels under construction

 

Company

 

Date of Incorporation

 

Vessel Name

 

Year
Built(2)

 

TEU

Cellcontainer (No. 7) Corp.

 

October 31, 2007

 

Hanjin Italy(3)

 

2011

 

10,100

CellContainer (No. 5) Corp.

 

March 23, 2007

 

Hanjin Constantza(4)

 

2011

 

3,400

Cellcontainer (No.8) Corp.

 

October 31, 2007

 

Hanjin Greece(5)

 

2011

 

10,100

Teucarrier (No. 1) Corp.

 

January 31, 2007

 

Hull No. Z00001

 

2011

 

8,530

Teucarrier (No. 2) Corp.

 

January 31, 2007

 

Hull No. Z00002

 

2011

 

8,530

Teucarrier (No. 3) Corp.

 

January 31, 2007

 

Hull No. Z00003

 

2011

 

8,530

Teucarrier (No. 4) Corp.

 

January 31, 2007

 

Hull No. Z00004

 

2011

 

8,530

Teucarrier (No. 5) Corp.

 

September 17, 2007

 

Hull No. H1022A

 

2011

 

8,530

Megacarrier (No. 1) Corp.

 

September 10, 2007

 

Hull No. S-456

 

2012

 

12,600

Megacarrier (No. 2) Corp.

 

September 10, 2007

 

Hull No. S-457

 

2012

 

12,600

Megacarrier (No. 3) Corp.

 

September 10, 2007

 

Hull No. S-458

 

2012

 

12,600

Megacarrier (No. 4) Corp.

 

September 10, 2007

 

Hull No. S-459

 

2012

 

12,600

Megacarrier (No. 5) Corp.

 

September 10, 2007

 

Hull No. S-460

 

2012

 

12,600

 


(1) Vessel subject to charterer’s option to purchase vessel after first eight years of time charter term for $78.0 million.

 

(2) Estimated completion year.

 

(3) On April 6, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Italy.

 

(4) On April 15, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 3,400 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Constantza.

 

(5) On May 4, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Greece.

 

2                 Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Fair Value

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued amended standards requiring additional fair value disclosures. The amended standards require disclosures of transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as well as requiring gross basis disclosures for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within the Level 3 reconciliation. Additionally, the update clarifies the requirement to determine the level of disaggregation for fair value measurement disclosures and to disclose valuation techniques and inputs used for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements in either Level 2 or Level 3. The new guidance was effective in the first quarter of 2010, except for the disclosures related to purchases, sales, issuance and settlements, which was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. The adoption of the new standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s condensed financial statements.

 

F-7



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

3                 Restricted Cash

 

Restricted cash is comprised of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of March 31,
2011

 

As of December 31,
2010

 

Retention

 

$

95

 

$

2,907

 

 

The Company was required to maintain cash of $0.1 million and $2.9 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, in a retention bank account as collateral for the upcoming scheduled debt payments of its KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities.

 

4                 Fixed assets, net

 

Fixed assets consist of vessels. Vessels’ cost, accumulated depreciation and changes thereto were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Vessel
Cost

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Net Book
Value

 

As of January 1, 2010

 

$

1,862,018

 

$

(288,259

)

$

1,573,759

 

Additions

 

778,839

 

(77,045

)

701,794

 

Disposals

 

(11,721

)

9,651

 

(2,070

)

As of December 31, 2010

 

$

2,629,136

 

$

(355,653

)

$

2,273,483

 

Additions

 

214,705

 

(22,436

)

192,269

 

As of March 31, 2011

 

$

2,843,841

 

$

(378,089

)

$

2,465,752

 

 

i.

On January 26, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 3,400 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Algeciras, for $55.9 million. The vessel has been deployed on a 10-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

 

ii.

On March 10, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Germany, for $145.2 million. The vessel has been deployed on a 12-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

 

The contract price of newbuilding vessel, as discussed above, excludes any items capitalized during the construction period, such as interest expense and other predelivery expenses, which increase the total cost of each vessel recorded upon delivery under “Fixed Assets, net”.

 

The residual value (estimated scrap value at the end of the vessels’ useful lives) of the fleet was estimated at $291.8 million as of March 31, 2011 and $276.6 million as of December 31, 2010. The Company has calculated the residual value of the vessels taking into consideration the 10 year average and the five year average of the scrap steel value per ton. The Company has applied uniformly the scrap value of $300 per ton for all vessels. The Company believes that $300 per ton is a reasonable estimate of future scrap prices, taking into consideration the cyclicality of future demand for scrap steel. Although the Company believes that the assumptions used to determine the scrap rate are reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective, in part, because of the cyclical nature of future demand for scrap steel.

 

F-8



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

5                 Advances for Vessels under Construction

 

a)                                     Advances for vessels under construction were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of March 31,
 2011

 

As of December 31,
 2010

 

Advance payments for vessels

 

$

315,452

 

$

354,113

 

Progress payments for vessels

 

445,591

 

484,141

 

Capitalized interest

 

63,930

 

66,167

 

Total

 

$

824,973

 

$

904,421

 

 

As of March 31, 2011, the Company had remitted the following installments:

 

The Company entered into four newbuilding contracts on March 2, 2007, with China Shipbuilding Trading Company, Limited for four 6,800 TEU containerships (the HN Z00001, the HN Z00002, the HN Z00003 and the HN Z00004). The contract price of each vessel is $92.5 million. The Company has already paid $248.6 million, as of March 31, 2011, in relation to these contracts. On July 12, 2007, the Company agreed with China Shipbuilding Trading Company Limited for the upgrading of its earlier order for four 6,800 TEU containerships to four 8,530 TEU vessels. The contract price of each vessel is $113.0 million. These vessels will be built by the Shanghai Jiangnan Changxing Heavy Industry Company Limited and are expected to be delivered to the Company throughout 2011. The Company has arranged to charter these containerships under 12-year charters with a major liner company upon delivery of each vessel.

 

The Company entered into newbuilding contracts on April 5, 2007, with Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co, Ltd for one 3,400 TEU containership (the Hanjin Constantza). The contract price of the vessel is $55.9 million. The Company has already paid $27.9 million, as of March 31, 2011, in relation to this contract. The vessel is expected to be delivered to the Company during the second quarter of 2011. On April 11, 2007, the Company arranged for a 10 year charter for this vessel with a major liner company upon delivery of the vessel.

 

On September 19, 2007, the Company extended its shipbuilding contracts with China Shipbuilding Trading Company Limited to include one more 8,530 TEU vessel, bringing the total number to five vessels. The Company has already paid $70.5 million, as of March 31, 2011, in relation to this contract. All five Post Panamax containerships will be built by the Shanghai Jiangnan Changxing Heavy Industry Company Limited and are expected to be delivered throughout 2011. The Company has also arranged with a major liner company to charter all these vessels for 12 years each upon delivery of the vessels.

 

The Company entered into newbuilding contracts on September 28, 2007, with Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries Co. Limited for five 12,600 TEU containerships (the HN S-456, the HN S-457, the HN S-458, the HN S-459 and the HN S-460). The contract price of each vessel is $166.9 million. The Company has already paid $249.2 million, as of March 31, 2011, in relation to these contracts. The vessels are expected to be delivered to the Company throughout the first half of 2012. The Company has arranged to charter each of these containerships under 12-year charters with a major liner company upon delivery of each vessel.

 

The Company entered into newbuilding contracts on November 9, 2007, with Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries Co. Limited for two 10,100 TEU containerships (the Hanjin Italy and the Hanjin Greece). The contract price of each vessel is $145.2 million. The Company has already paid $145.2 million, as of March 31, 2011, in relation to these contracts. The vessels are expected to be delivered to the Company during the second quarter of 2011. The Company has arranged to charter each of these containerships under 12-year charters with a major liner company upon delivery of each vessel.

 

F-9



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

5                 Advances for Vessels under Construction (continued)

 

b)                                     Advances for vessels under construction and transfers to vessels’ cost as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, were as follows (in thousands):

 

As of January 1, 2010

 

$

1,194,088

 

Additions

 

577,996

 

Impairment loss

 

(71,509

)

Write-off of accrued progress payments and capitalized interest to shipyards of newbuildings cancelled

 

(15,396

)

Transfer to vessels’ cost

 

(780,758

)

As of December 31, 2010

 

$

904,421

 

Additions

 

135,443

 

Transfer to vessels’ cost

 

(214,891

)

As of March 31, 2011

 

$

824,973

 

 

6                 Deferred Charges, net

 

Deferred charges, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

Drydocking and
Special Survey
Costs

 

Finance
and Other
Costs

 

Total
Deferred
Charges

 

As of January 1, 2010

 

$

9,406

 

$

11,177

 

$

20,583

 

Additions

 

3,122

 

10,926

 

14,048

 

Written off amounts

 

(89

)

(1,084

)

(1,173

)

Amortization

 

(7,426

)

(1,340

)

(8,766

)

As of December 31, 2010

 

$

5,013

 

$

19,679

 

$

24,692

 

Additions

 

4,902

 

83,168

 

88,070

 

Amortization

 

(1,530

)

(1,279

)

(2,809

)

As of March 31, 2011

 

$

8,385

 

$

101,568

 

$

109,953

 

 

The Company follows the deferral method of accounting for drydocking and special survey costs in accordance with accounting for planned major maintenance activities, whereby actual costs incurred are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period until the next scheduled survey, which is two and a half years.  If special survey or drydocking is performed prior to the scheduled date, the remaining unamortized balances are immediately written off. Furthermore, when a vessel is drydocked for more than one reporting period, the respective costs are identified and recorded in the period in which they were incurred and not at the conclusion of the drydocking.

 

On March 2, 2011, the Company committed to issue 15,000,000 warrants to its lenders under the Bank Agreement and the New Credit Facilities to purchase, solely on a cash-less exercise basis, shares of its common stock. On March 17, 2011, the Company issued 11,213,713 warrants at an initial exercise price of $6.00 per share, which exercise price was increased to $7.00 per share on March 29, 2011 upon the delivery of certain documents, as required by the Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility and related arrangement with Sinosure. Remaining warrants will be issued in the following months upon the instructions of the respective lenders (see Note 18, Subsequent Events). All warrants issued, or to be issued, will expire on January 31, 2019. The Company will not receive any cash upon exercise of the warrants as the warrants are only exercisable on a cashless basis. The Company has also agreed to register the warrants and underlying shares of common stock for resale under the Securities Act.

 

F-10



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

6                 Deferred Charges (Continued)

 

The fair value of the warrants as of March 2, 2011 of $51.8 million (the date the Company entered into the warrant agreement) was estimated using the Binominal model and the assumptions used to calculate the fair value were the underlying stock price of $3.45, initial exercise price of $6.00 per share based on the warrant agreement, volatility of 72% based on historical data of the Company’s closing share price since its initial public offering, time to expiration based upon the contractual life, short-term (risk-free) interest rate based upon the treasury securities with a similar expected term and no dividends being paid. On March 29, 2011, the exercise price of the warrants was increased to $7.00 per share, in accordance with the warrant agreement, following the delivery of certain documents, as required by the Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility and related arrangement with Sinosure.

 

The warrants were considered a liability instrument from March 2, 2011 up to the date the exercise price was fixed to $7.00 per share and were marked to market. On March 29, 2011, the warrants were reclassified from liability to equity since the exercise price was fixed and the warrants meet all conditions for classification as equity. Therefore, assuming no changes to the existing warrant agreement, any future changes in the fair value of the warrants subsequent to the amendment date of the exercise price will not be recognized in the financial statements so long as warrant continues to meet equity classification criteria in future periods. The warrants were considered non-cash fees paid to the Company’s lenders and are deferred and will be amortized over the life of the respective facilities in accordance with the interest method.

 

The fair value of the warrants on the amendment date March 29, 2011 was $54.1 million compared to $51.8 million as of March 2, 2011. The $2.3 million loss arising from the change in the fair value of the warrants from March 2, 2011 to March 29, 2011 has been recorded in the condensed Statement of Income under “Other finance costs”.

 

7                 Other Non-current Assets

 

Other non-current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of March 31,
 2011

 

As of December 31,
 2010

 

Fair value of swaps

 

$

3,857

 

$

4,465

 

Other non-current assets

 

17,640

 

15,239

 

Total

 

$

21,497

 

$

19,704

 

 

On October 30, 2009, the Company agreed with one of its charterers, Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (“ZIM”), to revisions to charterparties for six of its vessels in operation, which keep the original charter terms in place, reducing the cash settlement of each charter hire by 17.5% which becomes a subsequent payment. Each subsequent payment, which accumulates in any financial quarter, is satisfied by callable exchange notes (the “CENs”). CENs will be issued by ZIM once per financial quarter at a face value equal to the aggregate amount of such subsequent payments from that financial quarter plus a premium amount (being an amount calculated as if each such subsequent payment had accrued interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date when it would have been due under the original charter party until the relevant issue date for the CENs).

 

Unless previously converted at the holder’s option into ZIM’s common stock (only upon ZIM becoming a publicly listed company) or redeemed partially prior to or in full in cash, on July 1, 2016, ZIM will redeem the CENs at their remaining nominal amount together with the 6% interest accrued up to that date in cash only.

 

In this respect, the Company recorded a note receivable from ZIM in “Other non-current assets” of $16.1 million and $13.7 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

 

In respect of the fair value of swaps, refer to Note 11b, Financial Instruments — Fair Value Interest Rate Swap Hedges.

 

F-11



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

8                 Accrued Liabilities

 

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of March 31,
2011

 

As of December 31,
2010

 

Accrued payroll

 

$

1,198

 

$

1,029

 

Accrued interest

 

1,548

 

16,863

 

Accrued expenses

 

36,090

 

52,810

 

Total

 

$

38,836

 

$

70,702

 

 

The Company recorded accrued interest of $15.8 million as of December 31, 2010 in relation to the margin increase of its $700.0 million senior credit facility with Aegean Baltic Bank S.A., HSH Nordbank AG and Piraeus Bank in accordance with the Bank Agreement (refer to Note 10, Long-Term Debt), which was cash settled in March 2011.

 

Accrued expenses mainly consisted of accrued realized losses on cash flow interest rate swaps of $17.8 million and $19.5 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, as well as accrued interest to shipyards in relation to deferred payment of certain progress payments, which will be paid on delivery of the respective vessels of $7.9 million and $7.1 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. In addition, debt restructuring fees accrued of $17.7 million as of December 31, 2010 were paid to lenders during the three months ended March 31, 2011. Refer to Note 10, Long-term Debt, for further details on fees related to the Company’s restructuring agreement.

 

9                 Other Current and Long-term Liabilities

 

Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of March 31,
 2011

 

As of December 31,
 2010

 

Fair value of swaps

 

$

134,507

 

$

129,747

 

 

Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of March 31,
 2011

 

As of December 31,
 2010

 

Fair value of swaps

 

$

255,137

 

$

 $302,161

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

7,489

 

2,437

 

Total

 

$

262,626

 

$

 $304,598

 

 

Other long-term liabilities mainly consists of $4.7 million of deferred fees accrued in relation to the Bank Agreement (refer to Note 10, Long-Term Debt), which will be cash settled in December 31, 2014 and was recorded at amortized cost, as well as an accrual of $0.3 million for the first quarter of 2011 in relation to an exit fee under the Bank Agreement (refer to Note 10, Long-Term Debt), which will accrete through the period that it will be cash settled, on December 31, 2018, up to a total amount of $15.0 million.

 

In respect of the fair value of swaps, refer to Note 12a, Financial Instruments — Cash Flow Interest Rate Swap Hedges.

 

F-12



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

10            Long-Term Debt

 

Long-term debt as of March 31, 2011, consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

Lender

 

As of
March 31,
2011

 

Current
portion

 

Long-term
portion

 

As of
December 31,
2010

 

Current
portion

 

Long-term
portion

 

The Royal Bank of Scotland

 

$

639,800

 

$

 

$

639,800

 

$

611,812

 

$

 

$

611,812

 

HSH Nordbank

 

35,000

 

 

35,000

 

35,000

 

 

35,000

 

The Export-Import Bank of Korea (“KEXIM”)

 

57,456

 

10,369

 

47,087

 

60,048

 

10,369

 

49,679

 

The Export-Import Bank of Korea & ABN Amro

 

96,234

 

11,250

 

84,984

 

101,859

 

11,250

 

90,609

 

Deutsche Bank

 

180,000

 

 

180,000

 

180,000

 

 

180,000

 

Emporiki Bank of Greece

 

156,800

 

 

156,800

 

156,800

 

 

156,800

 

HSH Nordbank AG-Aegean Baltic Bank-Piraeus Bank

 

664,325

 

 

664,325

 

688,075

 

 

688,075

 

Credit Suisse

 

221,100

 

 

221,100

 

221,100

 

 

221,100

 

ABN Amro-Lloyds TSB-National Bank of Greece

 

253,200

 

 

253,200

 

253,200

 

 

253,200

 

Deutsche Schiffsbank-Credit Suisse-Emporiki Bank of Greece

 

252,432

 

 

252,432

 

252,432

 

 

252,432

 

The Royal Bank of Scotland

 

46,500

 

 

46,500

 

 

 

 

HSH Nordbank AG-Aegean Baltic Bank-Piraeus Bank

 

23,750

 

 

23,750

 

 

 

 

—Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing

 

21,715

 

 

21,715

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value hedged debt

 

4,246

 

 

4,246

 

5,200

 

 

5,200

 

Total

 

$

2,652,558

 

$

21,619

 

$

2,630,939

 

$

2,565,526

 

$

21,619

 

$

2,543,907

 

 

All loans discussed above are collateralized by first and second preferred mortgages over the vessels financed, general assignment of all hire freights, income and earnings, the assignment of their insurance policies, as well as any proceeds from the sale of mortgaged vessels and the corporate guarantee of Danaos Corporation.

 

Bank Agreement

 

On January 24, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive agreement, which is referred to as the Bank Agreement, that superseded, amended and supplemented the terms of each of the Company’s then-existing credit facilities (other than its credit facilities with KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro which are not covered thereby), and provides for, among other things, revised amortization schedules, maturities, interest rates, financial covenants, events of defaults, guarantee and security packages and approximately $425 million of new debt financing, including $23.75 million under a bridge facility, which had already been advanced to us following the delivery of the CMA CGM Rabelais on July 2, 2010, and has been transferred to one of the New Credit Facilities. Subject to the terms of the Bank Agreement and the intercreditor agreement (the “Intercreditor Agreement”), which the Company entered into with each of the lenders participating under the Bank Agreement to govern the relationships between the lenders thereunder, under the New Credit Facilities (as described and defined below) and under the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing described below, the lenders participating thereunder will continue to provide the Company’s then-existing credit facilities (with any revolving loans converted to term loans) and waived any existing covenant breaches or defaults under its existing credit facilities as of December 31, 2010 and amends the covenants under the existing credit facilities in accordance with the terms of the Bank Agreement. All conditions to the effectiveness of the Bank Agreement have been satisfied, including definitive documentation for the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing entered into September 27, 2010, documentation evidencing the cancellation of three newbuilding agreements entered into in May 2010, entry into the Sinosure- CEXIM Credit Facility on February 21, 2011 and the receipt of $200 million in net proceeds from equity issuances, which occurred in August 2010, including an investment by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

 

Interest and Fees

 

Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, borrowings under each of the Company’s existing credit facilities, other than the KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities which are not covered by the Bank Agreement, will bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.85%.

 

F-13



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Under the previously existing Aegean Baltic—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank credit facility, the Company was required to make a margin adjustment fee payment equal to 1.55 percentage points of the applicable balance, calculated for the period from July 1, 2009 to the closing date under the Bank Agreement of March 4, 2011, to the participating lenders who are party to the Aegean Baltic Bank-HSH Nordbank-Piraeus Bank facility agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2010, $15.8 million of margin adjustment fees were accrued and recorded as interest expense in the consolidated Statement of Income or capitalized into the cost of the vessels under construction. The remaining fees of $1.8 million were incurred in 2011 and the total amount of $17.6 million was cash settled in March 2011.

 

The Company was also required to make a waiver adjustment payment, in respect of prior waivers obtained in 2009 and 2010 (contingent upon the closing of the Bank Agreement), such that each lender under any of the Company’s existing credit facilities prior to entry into the Bank Agreement would receive cumulative waiver fees during the preceding period of 0.2% of its existing financing commitments. This fee totaled $2.6 million and was paid in January 2011, and was deferred and will be amortized over the life of the respective credit facilities using the effective interest rate method.

 

The Company was also required to pay an amendment fee equal to 0.50% of the outstanding commitments under each existing financing arrangement, or $12.5 million in the aggregate, of which 20% was paid and deferred on the signing of a commitment letter for the Bank Agreement in August 2010, 40% became payable, and was paid, in January 2011 upon satisfaction of the conditions to the Bank Agreement and the remaining 40% is due on December 31, 2014, which was recognized at amortized cost. All fees above (including the fee due December 2014 which was accrued) were deferred as of March 31, 2011 and will be amortized over the life of the respective credit facilities using the effective interest rate method.

 

The Company was also required to pay a fee of 0.25% of the total committed amount contemplated by the August 6, 2010 commitment letter for the Bank Agreement for the period starting from August 6, 2010 up until March 4, 2011 (the effective date of the agreement) and will be amended to 0.75% thereafter, which is capitalized on cost of vessels under construction as it relates to undrawn committed debt designated for specific newbuildings, and a $4.38 million amendment fee (of which $1.22 million was paid in December 2010 and $3.16 million was paid in January 2011) relating to conditions in respect of the Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility. This amendment fee was deferred and will be amortized over the life of the new debt using the effective interest rate method.

 

Principal Payments

 

Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the Company is not required to repay any outstanding principal amounts under its existing credit facilities, other than the KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities which are not covered by the Bank Agreement, until after March 31, 2013; thereafter it will be required to make quarterly principal payments in fixed amounts, in relation to the Company’s total debt commitments from the Company’s lenders under the Bank Agreement and New Credit Facilities, as specified in the table below:

 

 

 

February 15,

 

May 15,

 

August 15,

 

November 15,

 

December 31,

 

Total

 

2013

 

 

19,481,395

 

21,167,103

 

21,482,169

 

 

62,130,667

 

2014

 

22,722,970

 

21,942,530

 

22,490,232

 

24,654,040

 

 

91,809,772

 

2015

 

26,736,647

 

27,021,750

 

25,541,180

 

34,059,102

 

 

113,358,679

 

2016

 

30,972,971

 

36,278,082

 

32,275,598

 

43,852,513

 

 

143,379,164

 

2017

 

44,938,592

 

36,690,791

 

35,338,304

 

31,872,109

 

 

148,839,796

 

2018

 

34,152,011

 

37,585,306

 

44,398,658

 

45,333,618

 

65,969,274

 

227,438,867

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

786,956,945

 

 

The Company may elect to make the scheduled payments shown in the above table three months earlier.

 

Furthermore, an additional variable payment in such amount that, together with the fixed principal payment (as disclosed above), equals 92.5% of Actual Free Cash Flow for such quarter until the earlier of (x) the date on which the consolidated net leverage is below 6:1 and (y) May 15, 2015; and thereafter through maturity, which will be December 31, 2018 for each covered credit facility, it will be required to make fixed quarterly principal payments in fixed amounts as specified in the Bank Agreement and described above plus an additional payment in such amount that, together with the fixed principal payment, equals 89.5% of Actual Free Cash Flow for such quarter. In addition, any additional amounts of cash and cash equivalents, but during the final principal payment period described above only

 

F-14



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

such additional amounts in excess of the greater of (1) $50 million of accumulated unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and (2) 2% of the Company’s consolidated debt, would be applied first to the prepayment of the new credit facilities and after the new credit facilities are repaid, to the existing credit facilities. The last payment due on December 31, 2018, will also include the unamortized remaining principal debt balances, as such amount will be determinable following the fixed and variable amortization.

 

Under the Bank Agreement, “Actual Free Cash Flow” with respect to each credit facility covered thereby would be equal to revenue from the vessels collateralizing such facility, less the sum of (a) interest expense under such credit facility, (b) pro-rata portion of payments under its interest rate swap arrangements, (c) interest expense and scheduled amortization under the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing and (d) per vessel operating expenses and pro rata per vessel allocation of general and administrative expenses (which are not permitted to exceed the relevant budget by more than 20%), plus (e) the pro-rata share of operating cash flow of any Applicable Second Lien Vessel (which will mean, with respect to an existing facility, a vessel with respect to which the participating lenders under such facility have a second lien security interest and the first lien credit facility has been repaid in full).

 

Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the Company will continue to be required to make any mandatory prepayments provided for under the terms of its existing credit facilities and will be required to make additional prepayments as follows

 

·             50% of the first $300 million of net equity proceeds (including convertible debt and hybrid instruments), excluding the $200 million of net equity proceeds which was a condition to the Bank Agreement and were received in August 2010 for which there are no specified required uses, after entering into the Bank Agreement and 25% of any additional net equity proceeds; and

 

·             any debt proceeds (after repayment of any underlying secured debt covered by vessels collateralizing the new borrowings) (excluding the New Credit Facilities, the Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility and the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing),

 

which amounts would first be applied to repayment of amounts outstanding under the New Credit Facilities and then to the existing credit facilities. Any equity proceeds retained by the Company and not used within 12 months for certain specified purposes would be applied for prepayment of the new credit facilities and then to the existing credit facilities. The Company would also be required to prepay the portion of a credit facility attributable to a particular vessel upon the sale or total loss of such vessel; the termination or loss of an existing charter for a vessel, unless replaced within a specified period by a similar charter acceptable to the lenders; or the termination of a newbuilding contract. The Company’s respective lenders under its existing credit facilities covered by the Bank Agreement and the New Credit Facilities may, at their option, require the Company to repay in full amounts outstanding under such respective credit facilities, upon a “Change of Control” of the Company, which for these purposes is defined as (i) Dr. Coustas ceasing to be its Chief Executive Officer, (ii) its common stock ceasing to be listed on the NYSE (or Nasdaq or other recognized stock exchange), (iii) a change in the ultimate beneficial ownership of the capital stock of any of its subsidiaries or ultimate control of the voting rights of those shares, (iv) Dr. Coustas and members of his family ceasing to collectively own over one-third of the voting interest in its outstanding capital stock or (v) any other person or group controlling more than 20% of the voting power of its outstanding capital stock.

 

Covenants and Events of Defaults

 

Under the terms of the existing facilities, before Bank Agreement was entered into on January 24, 2011, the Company was in breach of various covenants in its credit facilities as of December 31, 2010, for which it had not obtained waiver. In addition, although the Company was in compliance with the covenants in its credit facilities with KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro, under the cross default provisions of its credit facilities the lenders could require immediate repayment of the related outstanding debt. On January 24, 2011, the Company entered into the Bank Agreement that supersedes, amends and supplements the terms of each of its existing credit facilities (other than its credit facilities with KEXIM and KEXIM ABN Amro) and provides for, among other things, revised financial covenants and waives all covenant breaches or defaults under its existing credit facilities as of December 31, 2010, as well as amends future covenants levels under such existing credit facilities as described below, with which the Company was in compliance as of March 31, 2011 and , based on currently prevailing containership charter rates and vessel values, expects to be in compliance for the next 12 months period from the date of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Under the Bank Agreement, the financial covenants under each of the Company’s existing credit facilities (other than under the KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facility which is not covered thereby, but which has been aligned with

 

F-15



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

those covenants below through June 30, 2012 under the supplemental letter signed on August 12, 2010 and the KEXIM credit facility, which contains only a collateral coverage covenant of 130%), have been reset to require the Company to:

 

·                                          maintain a ratio of (i) the market value of all of the vessels in the Company’s fleet, on a charter-inclusive basis, plus the net realizable value of any additional collateral, to (ii) the Company’s consolidated total debt above specified minimum levels gradually increasing from 90% through December 31, 2011 to 130% from September 30, 2017 through September 30, 2018;

 

·                                          maintain a minimum ratio of (i) the market value of the nine vessels (Hull Nos. S456, S457, S458, S459, S460, Hanjin Germany, Hanjin Italy, Hanjin Greece and CMA CGM Rabelais) collateralizing the New Credit Facilities, calculated on a charter-free basis, plus the net realizable value of any additional collateral, to (ii) the Company’s aggregate debt outstanding under the New Credit Facilities of 100% from September 30, 2012 through September 30, 2018;

 

·                                          maintain minimum free consolidated unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, less the amount of the aggregate variable principal amortization amounts, described above, of $30.0 million at the end of each calendar quarter, other than during 2012 when the Company will be required to maintain a minimum amount of $20.0 million;

 

·                                          ensure that the Company’s (i) consolidated total debt less unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to (ii) consolidated EBITDA (defined as net income before interest, gains or losses under any hedging arrangements, tax, depreciation, amortization and any other non-cash item, capital gains or losses realized from the sale of any vessel, finance charges and capital losses on vessel cancellations and before any non-recurring items and excluding any accrued interest due to us but not received on or before the end of the relevant period; provided that non-recurring items excluded from this calculation shall not exceed 5% of EBITDA calculated in this manner) for the last twelve months does not exceed a maximum ratio gradually decreasing from 12:1 on December 31, 2010 to 4.75:1 on September 30, 2018;

 

·                                          ensure that the ratio of the Company’s (i) consolidated EBITDA for the last twelve months to (ii) net interest expense (defined as interest expense (excluding capitalized interest), less interest income, less realized gains on interest rate swaps (excluding capitalized gains) and plus realized losses on interest rate swaps (excluding capitalized losses)) exceeds a minimum level of 1.50:1 through September 30, 2013 and thereafter gradually increasing to 2.80:1 by September 30, 2018; and

 

·                                          maintain a consolidated market value adjusted net worth (defined as the amount by which the Company’s total consolidated assets adjusted for the market value of the Company’s vessels in the water less cash and cash equivalents in excess of the Company’s debt service requirements exceeds the Company’s total consolidated liabilities after excluding the net asset or liability relating to the fair value of derivatives as reflected in the Company’s financial statements for the relevant period) of at least $400 million.

 

For the purpose of these covenants, the market value of the Company’s vessels will be calculated, except as otherwise indicated above, on a charter-inclusive basis (using the present value of the “bareboat-equivalent” time charter income from such charter) so long as a vessel’s charter has a remaining duration at the time of valuation of more than 12 months plus the present value of the residual value of the relevant vessel (generally equivalent to the charter free value of such a vessel at the age such vessel would be at the expiration of the existing time charter). The market value for newbuilding vessels, all of which currently have multi-year charters, would equal the lesser of such amount and the newbuilding vessel’s book value.

 

Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the existing credit facilities also contain customary events of default, including those relating to cross-defaults to other indebtedness, defaults under its swap agreements, non-compliance with security documents, material adverse changes to its business, a Change of Control as described above, a change in its Chief Executive Officer, its common stock ceasing to be listed on the NYSE (or Nasdaq or another recognized stock exchange), a change in, or breach of the management agreement by, the manager for the vessels securing the respective credit facilities and cancellation or amendment of the time charters (unless replaced with a similar time charter with a charterer acceptable to the lenders) for the vessels securing the respective credit facilities.

 

Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the Company generally will not be permitted to incur any further financial indebtedness or provide any new liens or security interests, unless such security is provided for the equal and ratable benefit of each of the lenders being a party to the Intercreditor Agreement, other than security arising by

 

F-16



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

operation of law or in connection with the refinancing of outstanding indebtedness, with the consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, of all lenders with a lien on the security pledged against such outstanding indebtedness. In addition, the Company would not be permitted to pay cash dividends or repurchase shares of its capital stock unless (i) its consolidated net leverage is below 6:1 for two consecutive quarters and (ii) the ratio of the aggregate market value of its vessels to its outstanding indebtedness exceeds 125% for four consecutive quarters and provided that an event of default has not occurred and the Company is not, and after giving effect to the payment of the dividend, in breach of any covenant.

 

Collateral and Guarantees

 

Each of the Company’s existing credit facilities and swap arrangements, to the extent applicable, continue to be secured by their previous collateral on the same basis, and received, to the extent not previously provided, pledges of the shares of the Company’s subsidiaries owning the vessels collateralizing the applicable facilities, cross-guarantees from each subsidiary owning the vessels collateralizing such facilities, assignment of the refund guarantees in relation to any newbuildings funded by such facilities and other customary shipping industry collateral.

 

New Credit Facilities (Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank, RBS, ABN Amro Club facility, Club Facility and Citi-Eurobank)

 

On January 24, 2011, the Company entered into agreements for the following new term loan credit facilities (“New Credit Facilities”):

 

i.                                          a $123.8 million credit facility provided by Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank, which is secured by Hull No. S459, Hanjin Italy and CMA CGM Rabelais and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto (the $123.8 million amount includes principal commitment of $23.75 million under the Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank credit facility already drawn as of December 31, 2010, which was transferred to the new facility upon finalization of the agreement);

 

ii.                                       a $100.0 million credit facility provided by RBS, which is secured by Hull No. S458 and Hanjin Germany and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto;

 

iii.                                    a $37.1 million credit facility with ABN Amro and lenders participating under the Bank Agreement which is secured by Hanjin Greece and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto;

 

iv.                                   a $83.9 million new club credit facility to be provided, on a pro rata basis, by the other existing lenders participating under the Bank Agreement, which is secured by Hull No. S456 and Hull No. S457 and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto; and

 

v.                                      a $80 million credit facility with Citibank and Eurobank, which is secured by Hull No. S460 and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto ((i)-(v), collectively, the “New Credit Facilities”).

 

Interest and Fees

 

Borrowings under each of the New Credit Facilities above, which will be available for drawdown until the later of September 30, 2012 and delivery of the Company’s last contracted newbuilding vessel collateralizing such facility (so long as such delivery is no more than 240 days after the scheduled delivery date), will bear interest at an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.85%, subject, on and after January 1, 2013, to increases in the applicable margin to: (i) 2.50% if the outstanding indebtedness thereunder exceeds $276 million, (ii) 3.00% if the outstanding indebtedness thereunder exceeds $326 million and (iii) 3.50% if the outstanding indebtedness thereunder exceeds $376 million.

 

The Company committed to pay an arrangement fee of 2.00%, or $8.5 million in the aggregate, $3.3 million of which was paid and deferred in August 2010 (date of commitment letter entered into) and $5.2 million which was contingent upon entering into each of these new credit facilities and was paid in January 2011 and was deferred and will be amortized through the statement of income over the life of the respective facilities.

 

F-17



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

The Company was also required to pay a commitment fee of 0.75% per annum payable quarterly in arrears on the committed but undrawn portion of the respective loan. In addition the Company will be required to pay an aggregate exit fee of $15.0 million payable on the common maturity date of the New Credit Facilities of December 31, 2018, or such earlier date when all of the New Credit Facilities are repaid in full, which will accrete in the Statement of Income over the life of the respective facilities. The Company is required to pay an additional $10.0 million if it does not repay at least $150.0 million in the aggregate under the New Credit Facilities with equity proceeds by December 31, 2014. All reasonable expenses of the lenders, including the fees and expenses of their financial and legal advisors, are payable by the Company.

 

Principal Payments

 

Under the Bank Agreement, the Company is not required to repay any outstanding principal amounts under its New Credit Facilities until after March 31, 2013 and thereafter it will be required to make quarterly principal payments in fixed amounts as specified in the Bank Agreement plus an additional quarterly variable amortization payment, all as described above under “—Bank Agreement—Principal Payments.”

 

Covenants, Events of Default and Other Terms

 

The New Credit Facilities contain substantially the same financial and operating covenants, events of default, dividend restrictions and other terms and conditions as applicable to the Company’s existing credit facilities as revised under the Bank Agreement described above.

 

Collateral and Guarantees

 

The collateral described above relating to the newbuildings being financed by the respective credit facilities, will be (other than in respect of the CMA CGM Rabelais) subject to a limited participation by Hyundai Samho in any enforcement thereof until repayment of the related Hyundai Samho Vendor financing (described below) for such vessels. In addition lenders who participate in the new $83.9 million club credit facility described above received a lien on Hull No. S456 and Hull No. S457 as additional security in respect of the existing credit facilities the Company has with such lenders. The lenders under the other new credit facilities also received a lien on the respective vessels securing such new credit facilities as additional collateral in respect of its existing credit facilities and interest rate swap arrangements with such lenders and Citibank and Eurobank also received a second lien on Hull No. S460 as collateral in respect of its currently unsecured interest rate arrangements with them.

 

In addition, Aegean Baltic—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank also received a second lien on the Maersk Deva (ex Bunya Raya Tujuh), the CSCL Europe and the CSCL Pusan as collateral in respect of all borrowings from Aegean Baltic—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank and RBS also received a second lien on the Bunya Raya Tiga, CSCL America (ex MSC Baltic) and the CSCL Le Havre as collateral in respect of all borrrowings from RBS.

 

The Company’s obligations under the New Credit Facilities are guaranteed by its subsidiaries owning the vessels collateralizing the respective credit facilities. The Company’s Manager has also provided an undertaking to continue to provide the Company with management services and to subordinate its rights to the rights of its lenders, the security trustee and applicable hedge counterparties.

 

New Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility

 

On February 21, 2011, the Company entered into a bank syndicate agreement, arranged by Citibank and led by the Export-Import Bank of China (“CEXIM”) for a senior secured credit facility (the “Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility”) of up to $203.4 million, in three tranches each in an amount equal to the lesser of $67.8 million and 60.0% of the contract price for the newbuilding vessels, Hull No. Z00002, Hull No. Z00003 and Hull No. Z00004, securing such tranche for post-delivery financing of these vessels. CEXIM will provide the majority of the loan amount and a syndicate of lenders for which Citibank will act as agent. The China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation, or Sinosure, will cover a number of political and commercial risks associated with each tranche of the credit facility.

 

Principal and Interest Payments

 

Borrowings under the Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility will bear interest at an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.85% payable semi-annually in arrears. Upon entering into the credit facility,the Company became

 

F-18



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

committed to pay a commitment fee of 1.14% on undrawn amounts and the Company has paid an arrangement fee of $4.0 million, as well as a flat fee of $8.8 million to Sinosure for its participation, which were deferred as of March 31, 2011 and will be amortized over the life of the facility using the effective interest method. The Company will be required to repay principal amounts drawn under each tranche of the Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility in consecutive semi-annual installments over a ten-year period commencing after the delivery of the respective newbuilding being financed by such amount through the final maturity date of the respective tranches and repay the respective tranche in full upon the loss of the respective newbuilding.

 

Covenants, Events of Default and Other Terms

 

The Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility will require the Company to:

 

·                                          maintain a ratio of total net debt (defined as total liabilities less cash and cash equivalents) to adjusted total consolidated assets (total consolidated assets with market value of vessels replacing book value of vessels less cash and cash equivalents) of no more than 70%;

 

·                                          maintain a minimum ratio of the market value of the vessel collateralizing a tranche of the facility to debt outstanding under such tranche of 125%;

 

·                                          maintain minimum free consolidated unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, through February 21, 2014, of $30.0 million, and the higher of $30.0 million and 2% of consolidated total debt thereafter;

 

·                                          ensure that the ratio of the Company’s (i) consolidated EBITDA (defined as net income before interest, gains or losses under any hedging arrangements, tax, depreciation, amortization and any other non-cash item, capital gains or losses realized from the sale of any vessel, financing payments, fees and commissions and capital losses on vessel cancellations and before any non-recurring items) for the last twelve months to (ii) interest expense (defined as the aggregate amount of interest, commission, fees and other finance charges (excluding capitalized interest)) exceeds 2.50:1; and

 

·                                          maintain a consolidated market value adjusted net worth (defined as the Company’s total consolidated assets adjusted for the market value of the Company’s vessels less the Company’s total consolidated liabilities) of at least $400 million.

 

For the purpose of these covenants, the market value of the Company’s vessels will be calculated, except as otherwise indicated above, on a charter-inclusive basis (using the present value of the “bareboat-equivalent” time charter income from such charter) so long as a vessel’s charter has a remaining duration at the time of valuation of more than six months plus the present value of the residual value of the relevant vessel (generally equivalent to the charter free value of such a vessel at the age such vessel would be at the expiration of the existing time charter). The market value for newbuilding vessels, all of which currently have multi-year charters, would equal the lesser of such amount and the newbuilding vessel’s book value.

 

The Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility also contains customary events of default, including those relating to cross-defaults to other indebtedness, defaults under its swap agreements, non-compliance with security documents, material adverse changes to its business, a Change of Control as described above, a change in its Chief Executive Officer, its common stock ceasing to be listed on the NYSE (or Nasdaq or another recognized stock exchange), a change in, or breach of the management agreement by, the manager for the mortgaged vessels and cancellation or amendment of the time charters (unless replaced with a similar time charter with a charterer acceptable to the lenders) for the mortgaged vessels.

 

The Company will not be permitted to pay cash dividends or repurchase shares of its capital stock unless (i) its consolidated net leverage is below 6:1 for four consecutive quarters and (ii) the ratio of the aggregate market value of its vessels to its outstanding indebtedness exceeds 125% for four consecutive quarters and provided that an event of default has not occurred and the Company is not, and after giving effect to the payment of the dividend, in breach of any covenant.

 

F-19



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Collateral

 

The Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility will be secured by customary pre-delivery and post-delivery shipping industry collateral with respect to the newbuilding vessels, Hull No. Z00002, Hull No. Z00003 and Hull No. Z00004, securing the respective tranche.

 

Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing

 

On September 27, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries (“Hyundai Samho”) for a financing facility of $190.0 million in respect of eight of its newbuilding containerships being built by Hyundai Samho, Hull Nos. S456, S457, S458, S459, S460, Hanjin Germany, Hanjin Italy and Hanjin Greece, in the form of delayed payment of a portion of the final installment for each such newbuilding.

 

Borrowings under this facility will bear interest at a fixed interest rate of 8%. The Company will be required to repay principal amounts under this financing facility in seven consecutive semi-annual installments commencing one and a half years, in the case of three of the newbuilding vessels being financed, and one year, in the case of the other five newbuilding vessels, after the delivery of the respective newbuilding being financed. This financing facility does not require the Company to comply with financial covenants, but contains customary events of default, including those relating to cross-defaults. This financing facility is secured by second priority collateral related to the newbuilding vessels being financed.

 

Credit Facilities Summary Table

 

Lender

 

Remaining
Available
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Outstanding
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Collateral Vessels

Existing Credit Facilities

The Royal Bank of Scotland(2)

 

$

47.0

 

$

639.8

 

Mortgages for existing vessels and refund guarantees for newbuildings relating to the Hyundai Progress, the Hyundai Highway, the Hyundai Bridge, the Hyundai Federal (ex APL Confidence), the Zim Monaco, the Hanjin Buenos Aires, the Hanjin Versailles, the Hanjin Algeciras, the CMA CGM Racine and the HN H1022A

Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank(3)(4)

 

$

 

$

664.3

 

Jiangsu Dragon (ex CMA CGM Elbe), the California Dragon (ex CMA CGM Kalamata), the Shenzhen Dragon (ex CMA CGM Komodo), the Henry (ex CMA CGM Passiflore), the Hyundai Commodore (ex MOL Affinity), the Hyundai Duke, the CMA CGM Vanille, the Marathonas (ex MSC Marathon), the Maersk Messologi, the Maersk Mytilini, the YM Yantian, the Al Rayyan (ex Norasia Hamburg), the YM Milano, the CMA CGM Lotus, the Hyundai Vladivostok, the Hyundai Advance, the Hyundai Stride, the Hyundai Future, the Hyundai Sprinter and Hanjin Montreal

Emporiki Bank of Greece S.A.

 

$

 

$

156.8

 

CMA CGM Moliere and CMA CGM Musset

Deutsche Bank

 

$

 

$

180.0

 

Zim Rio Grande, the Zim Sao Paolo and Zim Kingston

Credit Suisse

 

$

 

$

221.1

 

Zim Luanda, CMA CGM Nerval and YM Mandate

 

F-20



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Lender

 

Remaining
Available
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Outstanding
Principal
Amount
(in millions)(1)

 

Collateral Vessels

ABN Amro—Lloyds TSB—National Bank of Greece

 

$

 

$

253.2

 

YM Colombo, YM Seattle, YM Vancouver and YM Singapore

Deutsche Schiffsbank—Credit Suisse—Emporiki Bank

 

$

46.1

 

$

252.4

 

ZIM Dalian, Hanjin Santos and YM Maturity and assignment of refund guarantees and newbuilding contracts relating to the HN N-223, and the HN Z00001

HSH Nordbank

 

$

 

$

35.0

 

Bunga Raya Tujuh (ex Maersk Deva) and the Bunga Raya Tiga (ex Maersk Derby)

KEXIM

 

$

 

$

57.5

 

CSCL Europe and the CSCL America (ex MSC Baltic)

KEXIM-ABN Amro

 

$

 

$

96.2

 

CSCL Pusan and the CSCL Le Havre

New Credit Facilities

Aegean Baltic-HSH Nordbank-Piraeus Bank(5)(6)

 

$

100.0

 

$

23.8

 

HN S459, Hanjin Italy and CMA CGM Rabelais

RBS(5)

 

$

53.5

 

$

46.5

 

HN S458 and Hanjin Germany

ABN Amro Club Facility(5)

 

$

37.1

 

$

 

Hanjin Greece

Club Facility(5)

 

$

83.9

 

$

 

HNS456 and HN S457

Citi- Eurobank(5)

 

$

80.0

 

$

 

HN S460

Sinosure-CEXIM(7)

 

$

203.4

 

$

 

Hull No. Z00002, Hull No. Z00003 and Hull No. Z00004

Hyundai Samho Vendor

 

$

168.3

 

$

21.7

 

Second priority liens on Hulls No. S456, S457, S458, S459, S460, Hanjin Germany, Hanjin Italy and Hanjin Greece.

 


(1)                                  As of March 31, 2011.

 

(2)                                  Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Bunga Raya Tiga, the CSCL America (ex MSC Baltic) and the CSCL Le Havre.

 

(3)                                  As of July 10, 2009, the Company agreed to amend the facility by adding additional collateral as follows: (a) newbuilding vessel CMA CGM Rabelais to be provided as first priority security under the facility, (b) second priority mortgages on the Bunga Raya Tujuh (ex Maersk Deva) and the Bunga Raya Tiga (ex Maersk Derby) financed by Aegean Baltic-HSH Nordbank AG-Pireaus Bank and Dresdner Bank and (c) second priority mortgages on the CSCL Europe and the CSCL America (ex MSC Baltic) financed by KEXIM credit facility and the CSCL Pusan (ex HN 1559) and the CSCL Le Havre (ex HN 1561) financed by the KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facility.

 

(4)                              Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Bunga Raya Tujuh, the CSCL Europe and the CSCL Pusan.

 

(5)                                  As of January 24, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with the respective banks.

 

(6)                                  Includes principal amount of $23.75 million under the Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank credit facility as of December 31, 2010 (following a scheduled payment of $1.25 million as of December 31, 2010), which will be transferred to the new facility from a bridge financing facility and was drawn down ($25.0 million) on July 1, 2010 for the delivery of the vessel CMA CGM Rabelais on July 2, 2010.

 

(7)                                  As of February 21, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive agreement for this facility.

 

In 2008, the Company entered into a credit facility of $253.2 million with ABN Amro (acting as agent), Lloyds TSB and National Bank of Greece in relation to the financing of vessels YM Colombo, YM Seattle, YM Vancouver and YM Singapore. The structure of this credit facility is such that the group of banks loaned funds of $253.2 million to the Company, which the Company then re-loaned to a newly created entity of the group of banks (“Investor Bank”). With the proceeds, Investor Bank then subscribed for preference shares in Auckland Marine Inc., Seacarriers Services Inc.,

 

F-21



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Seacarriers Lines Inc. and Wellington Marine Inc. (subsidiaries of Danaos Corporation). In addition, four of the Companies’ subsidiaries issued a put option in respect of the preference shares. The effect of these transactions is that the Company’s subsidiaries are required to pay out fixed preference dividends to the Investor Bank, the Investor Bank is required to pay fixed interest due on the loan from the Company to Investor Bank and finally the Investor Bank is required to pay put option premium on the put options issued in respect of the preference shares.

 

The interest payments to the Company by Investor Bank are contingent upon receipt of these preference dividends. In the event these dividends are not paid, the preference dividends will accumulate until such time as there are sufficient cash proceeds to settle all outstanding arrearages. Applying variable interest accounting to this arrangement, the Company has concluded that the Company is the primary beneficiary of Investor Bank and accordingly has consolidated it into the Company’s group. Accordingly, as at March 31, 2011, the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Operations includes Investor Bank’s net assets of $nil and net income of $nil, respectively, due to elimination on consolidation, of accounts and transactions arising between the Company and the Investor Bank.

 

As of March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under its Bank Agreement and its other credit facilities. In addition, under the prevailing market conditions and vessel values, the Company expects to be in compliance for the next twelve months period from the date of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

11     Financial Instruments

 

The principal financial assets of the Company consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and other assets. The principal financial liabilities of the Company consist of long-term bank loans, accounts payable and derivatives.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments:  The Company only uses derivatives for economic hedging purposes. The following is a summary of the Company’s risk management strategies and the effect of these strategies on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Interest Rate Risk:  Interest rate risk arises on bank borrowings. The Company monitors the interest rate on borrowings closely to ensure that the borrowings are maintained at favorable rates.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk:  Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, trade accounts receivable and derivatives. The Company places its temporary cash investments, consisting mostly of deposits, with established financial institutions. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of those financial institutions that are considered in the Company’s investment strategy. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to derivative instruments, however, the Company limits this exposure by diversifying among counterparties with high credit ratings. The Company depends upon a limited number of customers for a large part of its revenues. Credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable is generally managed by the selection of customers among the major liner companies in the world and their dispersion across many geographic areas. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is mainly limited to the carrying value of its derivative instruments. The Company is not a party to master netting arrangements.

 

Fair Value:  The carrying amounts reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of financial assets and liabilities excluding long-term bank loans approximate their respective fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The fair values of long-term floating rate bank loans approximate the recorded values, generally due to their variable interest rates. The fair value of the swap agreements equals the amount that would be paid by the Company to cancel the swaps.

 

Interest Rate Swaps:  The off-balance sheet risk in outstanding swap agreements involves both the risk of a counter-party not performing under the terms of the contract and the risk associated with changes in market value. The Company monitors its positions, the credit ratings of counterparties and the level of contracts it enters into with any one party. The counterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions. The Company has a policy of entering into contracts with parties that meet stringent qualifications and, given the high level of credit quality of its derivative counter-parties, the Company does not believe it is necessary to obtain collateral arrangements.

 

F-22



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

11     Financial Instruments (continued)

 

a.  Cash Flow Interest Rate Swap Hedges

 

The Company, according to its long-term strategic plan to maintain relative stability in its interest rate exposure, has decided to swap part of its interest expenses from floating to fixed. To this effect, the Company has entered into interest rate swap transactions with varying start and maturity dates, in order to pro-actively and efficiently manage its floating rate exposure.

 

These interest rate swaps are designed to economically hedge the variability of interest cash flows arising from floating rate debt, attributable to movements in three-month USD$ LIBOR. According to the Company’s Risk Management Accounting Policy, and after putting in place the formal documentation required by hedge accounting in order to designate these swaps as hedging instruments, as from their inception, these interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting, and, accordingly, since that time, only hedge ineffectiveness amounts arising from the differences in the change in fair value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item are recognized in the Company’s earnings. Assessment and measurement of prospective and retrospective effectiveness for these interest rate swaps are performed on a quarterly basis. For qualifying cash flow hedges, the fair value gain or loss associated with the effective portion of the cash flow hedge is recognized initially in stockholders’ equity, and recognized to the Statement of Income in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss. If the forecasted transaction does not occur, the ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the Statement of Income immediately.

 

The interest rate swap agreements converting floating interest rate exposure into fixed were as follows (in thousands):

 

Counter-party

 

Contract
Trade
Date

 

Effective
Date

 

Termination
Date

 

Notional
Amount on
Effective
Date

 

Fixed Rate
(Danaos
pays)

 

Floating Rate
(Danaos receives)

 

Fair Value
March 31,
2011

 

Fair Value
December 31,
2010

 

Interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments

 

RBS

 

03/09/2007

 

3/15/2010

 

3/15/2015

 

$

200,000

 

5.07% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(24,458

)

$

(27,093

)

RBS

 

03/16/2007

 

3/20/2009

 

3/20/2014

 

$

200,000

 

4.922% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(20,526

)

$

(22,955

)

RBS

 

11/28/2006

 

11/28/2008

 

11/28/2013

 

$

100,000

 

4.855% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(9,485

)

$

(10,659

)

RBS

 

11/28/2006

 

11/28/2008

 

11/28/2013

 

$

100,000

 

4.875% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(9,538

)

$

(10,717

)

RBS

 

12/01/2006

 

11/28/2008

 

11/28/2013

 

$

100,000

 

4.78% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(9,285

)

$

(10,440

)

HSH Nordbank

 

12/06/2006

 

12/8/2009

 

12/8/2014

 

$

400,000

 

4.855% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(44,426

)

$

(49,423

)

CITI

 

04/17/2007

 

4/17/2008

 

4/17/2015

 

$

200,000

 

5.124% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(25,082

)

$

(27,784

)

CITI

 

04/20/2007

 

4/20/2010

 

4/20/2015

 

$

200,000

 

5.1775% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(25,527

)

$

(28,258

)

RBS

 

09/13/2007

 

10/31/2007

 

10/31/2012

 

$

500,000

 

4.745% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(32,438

)

$

(37,425

)

RBS

 

09/13/2007

 

9/15/2009

 

9/15/2014

 

$

200,000

 

4.9775% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(22,483

)

$

(25,012

)

RBS

 

11/16/2007

 

11/22/2010

 

11/22/2015

 

$

100,000

 

5.07% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(12,879

)

$

(14,270

)

RBS

 

11/15/2007

 

11/19/2010

 

11/19/2015

 

$

100,000

 

5.12% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(13,099

)

$

(14,503

)

Eurobank

 

12/06/2007

 

12/10/2010

 

12/10/2015

 

$

200,000

 

4.8125% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(23,473

)

$

(26,125

)

CITI

 

10/23/2007

 

10/25/2009

 

10/27/2014

 

$

250,000

 

4.9975% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(28,677

)

$

(31,885

)

CITI

 

11/02/2007

 

11/6/2010

 

11/6/2015

 

$

250,000

 

5.1% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(32,451

)

$

(35,944

)

CITI

 

11/26/2007

 

11/29/2010

 

11/30/2015

 

$

100,000

 

4.98% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(12,488

)

$

(13,857

)

CITI

 

01/8/2008

 

1/10/2008

 

1/10/2011

 

$

300,000

 

3.57% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

 

$

(273

)

Total fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(346,315

)

$

(386,623

)

 

 

Interest rate swaps not designated as hedging instruments

 

CITI*

 

02/07/2008

 

2/11/2011

 

2/11/2016

 

$

200,000

 

4.695% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(22,517

)

$

(24,118

)

Eurobank*

 

02/11/2008

 

5/31/2011

 

5/31/2015

 

$

200,000

 

4.755% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA

 

$

(20,812

)

$

(21,167

)

Total fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(43,329

)

$

(45,285

)

 


*            Ceased to qualify for hedge accounting since March 31, 2010.

 

F-23



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

11     Financial Instruments (continued)

 

The Company recorded hedge ineffectiveness of $7.8 million gain and unrealized gains of $2.0 million in relation to fair value changes of two interest rate swaps (due to the their retrospective effectiveness testing failure) for the first quarter of 2011, which were all recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of income, as well as an amount of $0.1 million of unrealized losses reclassified from the “Accumulated other Comprehensive loss” to the condensed statement of income. The total fair value change of the interest rate swaps for the period January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011, amounted to $42.3 million.

 

The variable-rate interest on certain borrowings is associated with vessels under construction and is capitalized as a cost of the specific vessels. In accordance with the accounting guidance on derivatives and hedging, the amounts in accumulated comprehensive income/(loss) related to realized gain or losses on cash flow hedges that have been entered into, in order to hedge the variability of that interest, are classified under other comprehensive income/(loss) and are reclassified into earnings over the depreciable life of the constructed asset, since that depreciable life coincides with the amortization period for the capitalized interest cost on the debt. Realized losses on cash flow hedges of $9.9 million and $11.7 million were recorded in other comprehensive loss as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and an amount of $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million was reclassified into earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, representing its amortization over the depreciable life of the vessels.

 

 

 

Three months
ended

March 31,

 

Three months
ended

March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Unrealized gains/(losses)

 

 

 

$

9.7

 

 

 

$

(18.6

)

Total realized losses

 

(38.6

)

 

 

(28.4

)

 

 

Realized losses deferred in Other Comprehensive Loss

 

9.9

 

 

 

11.7

 

 

 

Realized losses expensed in Statement of Income

 

 

 

(28.7

)

 

 

(16.7

)

Amortization of deferred realized losses

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

Impairment of deferred realized losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.2

)

Loss on cash flow interest rate swaps

 

 

 

$

(19.2

)

 

 

$

(39.5

)

 

The Company is currently in an over-hedged position under its cash flow interest rate swaps, which is due to deferred progress payments to shipyards, cancellation of three newbuildings in 2010, replacements of variable interest rate debt with a fixed interest rate seller’s financing and equity proceeds from the Company’s private placement in 2010, all of which reduced initial forecasted variable interest rate debt and resulted in notional cash flow interest rate swaps being above the variable interest rate debt eligible for hedging. Realized losses attributable to the over-hedging position were $9.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $4.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

b.   Fair Value Interest Rate Swap Hedges

 

These interest rate swaps are designed to economically hedge the fair value of the fixed rate loan facilities against fluctuations in the market interest rates by converting the Company’s fixed rate loan facilities to floating rate debt. Pursuant to the adoption of the Company’s Risk Management Accounting Policy, and after putting in place the formal documentation required by hedge accounting in order to designate these swaps as hedging instruments, as of June 15, 2006, these interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting, and, accordingly, since that time, hedge ineffectiveness amounts arising from the differences in the change in fair value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item are recognized in the Company’s earnings. The Company considers its strategic use of interest rate swaps to be a prudent method of managing interest rate sensitivity, as it prevents earnings from being exposed to undue risk posed by changes in interest rates. Assessment and measurement of prospective and retrospective effectiveness for these interest rate swaps are performed on a quarterly basis, on the financial statement and earnings reporting dates.

 

F-24



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

11     Financial Instruments (continued)

 

The interest rate swap agreements converting fixed interest rate exposure into floating were as follows (in thousands):

 

Counter
party

 

Contract
trade
Date

 

Effective
Date

 

Termination
Date

 

Notional
Amount on
Effective
Date

 

Fixed Rate
(Danaos
receives)

 

Floating Rate
(Danaos pays)

 

Fair Value
March 31,
2011

 

Fair Value
December 31,
2010

 

RBS

 

11/15/2004

 

12/15/2004

 

8/27/2016

 

$

60,528

 

5.0125% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA + 0.835% p.a.

 

$

1,892

 

$

2,190

 

RBS

 

11/15/2004

 

11/17/2004

 

11/2/2016

 

$

62,342

 

5.0125% p.a.

 

USD LIBOR 3M BBA + 0.855% p.a.

 

$

1,965

 

$

2,275

 

Total fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,857

 

$

4,465

 

 

The total fair value change of the interest rate swaps for the period from January 1, 2011 until March 31, 2011, amounted to $0.6 million loss, and is included in the Statement of Income in “Gain/(loss) on fair value of derivatives”. The related asset of $3.9 million is shown under “Other non-current assets” in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The total fair value change of the underlying hedged debt for the period from January 1, 2011 until March 31, 2011, was $0.9 million gain. The net ineffectiveness for the three months ended March 31, 2011, amounted to $0.3 million gain and is shown in the Statement of Income in “Gain/(loss) on fair value of derivatives”.

 

 

 

Three months
ended

March 31,

 

Three months
ended

March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Unrealized gains/(losses) on swap asset

 

$

(0.6

)

$

0.3

 

Unrealized gains/(losses) on fair value of hedged debt

 

0.7

 

(0.2

)

Amortization fair value of hedged debt

 

0.2

 

0.2

 

Realized gains

 

0.6

 

0.7

 

Gain on fair value interest rate swaps

 

$

0.9

 

$

1.0

 

 

F-25



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

11     Financial Instruments (continued)

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value.

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2011

 

Assets

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

 

(in thousands of $)

 

Interest rate swap contracts

 

$

3,857

 

$

 

$

3,857

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap contracts

 

$

389,644

 

$

 

$

389,644

 

$

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2010

 

Assets

 

Total

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

 

 

 

(in thousands of $)

 

Interest rate swap contracts

 

$

4,465

 

$

 

$

4,465

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap contracts

 

$

431,908

 

$

 

$

431,908

 

$

 

 

Interest rate swap contracts are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is determined based on inputs that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of the interest rate swap contracts have been calculated by discounting the projected future cash flows of both the fixed rate and variable rate interest payments. Projected interest payments are calculated using the appropriate prevailing market forward rates and are discounted using the zero-coupon curve derived from the swap yield curve. Refer to Note 11(a)-(b) above for further information on the Company’s interest rate swap contracts.

 

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance of its counterparties in relation to these financial instruments. As of March 31, 2011, these financial instruments are in the counterparties’ favor.  The Company has considered its risk of non-performance and that of its counterparties in accordance with fair value accounting. The Company performs evaluations of its counterparties for credit risk through ongoing monitoring of their financial health and risk profiles to identify risk or changes in their credit ratings.

 

F-26



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

12     Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments

 

The Company, as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, had outstanding commitments of $1,008.9 million and $1,131.3 million, respectively, for the construction of container vessels as follows (in thousands):

 

Vessel

 

TEU

 

Contract Price

 

As of
March 31,
2011

 

As of
December 31,
2010

 

Hanjin Algeciras

 

3,400

 

$

55,880

 

$

 

$

27,940

 

Hanjin Germany

 

10,100

 

145,240

 

 

72,620

 

Hanjin Italy

 

10,100

 

145,240

 

72,620

 

79,883

 

Hanjin Constantza

 

3,400

 

55,880

 

27,940

 

27,940

 

Hanjin Greece

 

10,100

 

145,240

 

72,620

 

87,144

 

Hull Z00001

 

8,530

 

113,000

 

33,900

 

33,900

 

Hull Z00002

 

8,530

 

113,000

 

56,500

 

56,500

 

Hull Z00003

 

8,530

 

113,000

 

56,500

 

56,500

 

Hull Z00004

 

8,530

 

113,000

 

56,500

 

56,500

 

HN H 1022A

 

8,530

 

117,500

 

47,000

 

47,000

 

Hull S-456

 

12,600

 

166,916

 

117,066

 

117,066

 

Hull S-457

 

12,600

 

166,916

 

117,066

 

117,066

 

Hull S-458

 

12,600

 

166,916

 

117,066

 

117,066

 

Hull S-459

 

12,600

 

166,916

 

117,066

 

117,066

 

Hull S-460

 

12,600

 

166,916

 

117,066

 

117,066

 

 

 

142,750

 

$

1,951,560

 

$

1,008,910

 

$

1,131,257

 

 

Contingencies

 

On November 22, 2010, a purported Company shareholder filed a derivative complaint in the High Court of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The derivative complaint names as defendants seven of the eight members of the Company’s board of directors. The derivative complaint challenges the amendments in 2009 and 2010 to the Company’s management agreement with Danaos Shipping and certain aspects of the sale of common stock in August 2010. The complaint includes counts for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. On February 11, 2011, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion is due on May 17, 2011, and the reply brief is due on June 24, 2011. Although at this stage of the proceedings no estimate of a possible loss, if any, can be made, in the opinion of management the disposition of this lawsuit will not have a significant effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

 

Other than as described above, there are no material legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to which any of its properties are the subject, or other contingencies that the Company is aware of, other than routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business.

 

In the opinion of management, the disposition of the above described lawsuits will not have a significant effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

 

F-27



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

13     Stockholders’ Equity

 

Between March 29, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company issued 15,617 shares, of which 14,983 were newly issued shares and 634 were treasury shares to the employees of the Manager and directors of the Company and the Company has agreed to issue in 2011 an additional 382,261 new shares of common stock to employees of the Manager in respect of grants made in 2010 (as discussed below). As of March 31, 2011, the shares issued and outstanding were 108,626,538.

 

On August 6, 2010, the Company entered into agreements with several investors, including its largest stockholder, to sell to them 54,054,055 shares of its Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200.0 million in cash. The shares were issued at $3.70 per share on August 12, 2010. The Company recorded $0.5 million in its Share Capital and $199.5 million in its Additional paid in capital. As of December 31, 2010, the shares issued were 108,611,555 and the shares outstanding (which excludes the Treasury stock held by the Company as discussed below) were 108,610,921.

 

As of April 18, 2008, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee approved incentive compensation of Manager’s employees with its shares from time to time, after specific for each such time, decision by the compensation committee and the Board of Directors in order to provide a means of compensation in the form of free shares to certain employees of the Manager of the Company’s common stock. The Plan was effective as of December 31, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, employees of the Manager may receive (from time to time) shares of the Company’s common stock as additional compensation for their services offered during the preceding period. The stock will have no vesting period and the employee will own the stock immediately after grant. The total amount of stock to be granted to employees of the Manager will be at the Company’s Board of Directors’ discretion only and there will be no contractual obligation for any stock to be granted as part of the employees’ compensation package in future periods. During 2010, the Company granted an aggregate of 387,259 shares to all employees of the Manager and distributed 4,898 shares of its treasury stock to the qualifying employees of the Manager during 2010 and 100 shares of its new shares issued in March 2011, in settlement of the shares granted. The remaining 382,261shares will be distributed in the remainder of 2011.

 

The Company has also established the Directors Share Payment Plan under its 2006 equity compensation plan. The purpose of the Plan is to provide a means of payment of all or a portion of compensation payable to directors of the Company in the form of Company’s Common Stock. The Plan was effective as of April 18, 2008. Each member of the Board of Directors of the Company may participate in the Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, Directors may elect to receive in Common Stock all or a portion of their compensation. During the first three months of 2011, one director elected to receive in Company shares 50% of his compensation and one director elected to receive in Company shares 100% of his compensation. On the last business day of the first quarter of 2011, rights to receive 3,874 shares in aggregate for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 were credited to the Director’s Share Payment Account. As of March 31, 2011 less than $0.1 million were reported in “Additional Paid-in Capital” in respect of these rights. Following December 31 of each year, the Company delivers to each Director the number of shares represented by the rights credited to their Share Payment Account during the preceding calendar year. Of the new shares issued by the Company in the first quarter of 2011, 15,517 shares were distributed to directors of the Company in settlement of shares credited as of December 31, 2010.

 

F-28



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

14     Other Comprehensive Income

 

Other comprehensive income consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

Three months
ended
March 31, 2011

 

Three months
ended

March 31, 2010

 

Net income

 

$

5,443

 

$

(79,765

)

Change in fair value of financial instruments

 

40,308

 

(36,699

)

Realized losses on cash flow hedges amortized over the life of the newbuildings, net of amortization

 

(9,683

)

(11,707

)

Reclassifications to earnings due to hedge accounting ineffectiveness

 

(7,744

)

15,443

 

Other Comprehensive Income

 

$

28,324

 

$

(112,728

)

 

15     Earnings/(Loss) per Share

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

 

March 31,
2011

 

March 31,
2010

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

 

$

5,443

 

$

(79,765

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator (number of shares):

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

 

108,611

 

54,549

 

 

The Warrants issued during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were excluded from the diluted Earnings per Share during the quarter because they were antidilutive.

 

16     Sale of vessels

 

On January 22, 2010, the Company sold and delivered the MSC Eagle. The sale consideration was $4.6 million. The Company realized a net gain on this sale of $1.9 million. The MSC Eagle was over 30-years old and was generating revenue under its time charter, which expired in early January 2010.

 

No vessels were sold by the Company in the first quarter of 2011.

 

17     Impairment Loss

 

On March 31, 2010, the Company expected to enter into an agreement with Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co. Ltd. to cancel three 6,500 TEU newbuilding containerships, the HN N-216, the HN N-217 and the HN N-218, initially expected to be delivered in the first half of 2012, and recorded an impairment loss of $71.5 million, which consisted of cash advances of $64.35 million paid to the shipyard and $7.16 million of interest capitalized and other predelivery capital expenditures paid in relation to the construction of the respective newbuildings. On May 25, 2010, the Company signed the cancellation agreement.

 

No impairment loss was recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

 

F-29



 

DANAOS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

18     Subsequent Events

 

On April 1, 2011, the Company issued 3,711,417 warrants (from the total 15,000,000 committed warrants), to one of its lenders under the Bank Agreement and the New Credit Facilities to purchase, solely on a cash-less exercise basis, shares of common stock, which warrants have an exercise price of $7.00 per share (subject to antidilutive adjustments). The Company will issue the remaining 74,870 warrants upon the request of the applicable lender. All warrants issued, or to be issued, will expire on January 31, 2019.

 

Between April 1, 2011 and May 5, 2011, the Company issued 375,835 new shares to the employees of the Manager (in respect of grants made in 2010) and the Company has agreed to issue in 2011 an additional 22,015 new shares of common stock to employees of the Manager in respect of grants made in 2010.

 

On April 6, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Italy. The vessel has been deployed on a 12-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

On April 15, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 3,400 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Constantza. The vessel has been deployed on a 10-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

On May 4, 2011, the Company took delivery of the newbuilding 10,100 TEU vessel, the Hanjin Greece. The vessel has been deployed on a 12-year time charter with one of the world’s major liner companies.

 

F-30