1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JOHNSON v. EXXON-MOBILE CHEMICAL CO.
 

JOHNSON v. EXXON-MOBILE CHEMICAL CO.

No. A-0665-10T2.

RETHA JOHNSON, Petitioner-Respondent, v. EXXON-MOBILE CHEMICAL CO., Respondent-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 30, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen T. Fannon argued the cause for appellant (Capehart & Scatchard, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Fannon, of counsel; Patricia L. Dee , on the briefs).

Larry M. Radomski argued the cause for respondent (Wysoker, Glassner, Weingartner, Gonzalez & Lockspeiser, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Radomski, on the brief).

Before Judges Lihotz, Waugh, and St. John.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

PER CURIAM.

Respondent Exxon-Mobile Chemical Co. (Exxon), appeals from the final administrative decision of the Division of Workers' Compensation awarding benefits to petitioner Retha Johnson. We affirm.

I.

We discern the following facts and procedural history from the record on appeal.

Johnson worked for Exxon as a chemical operator in the synthetics division from 1988 to 2004. Her last day of work was in May...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases