THOMAS B. WELLS, derivatively on behalf of Molycorp, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
MARK A. SMITH, et al. Defendants, and
MOLYCORP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant. and
JAMES SWAGGERTY, derivatively on behalf of Molycorp, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
MARK A. SMITH, et al. Defendants, and
MOLYCORP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant. and
AVERY JAMES KAYTEN, derivatively on behalf of Molycorp, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
ROSS R. BHAPPU, et al. Defendants, and
MOLYCORP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Colorado.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Ross R. Bhappu, Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Brian T. Dolan, Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Alec Machiels, Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Mark S. Kristoff, Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Charles R. Henry, Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Jack E. Thompson, Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Russell D. Ball, Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
RCF Management, L.L.C, Defendant, represented by Daniel F. Wake , Sander Ingebretsen & Wake, P.C..
Pegasus Capital Advisors, L.P., Defendant, represented by Brian Thomas Carney , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP & Stephen M. Baldini , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP.
John Graell, Consol Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Michael Schwarzkopf, Consol Defendant, represented by Gregory J. Kerwin , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
Traxys North America LLC, Consol Defendant, represented by David Adam Berger , Allegaert Berger Vogel LLP.
United States District Court, D. Colorado.
ORDER
KRISTEN L. MIX, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants' opposed Motion to Stay [#94] (the "Motion"). Plaintiffs filed Responses [#97, #98], and Defendants filed Replies [#99, #100]. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motion [#94].
I. Background
This action consists of three consolidated cases: (1) Wells v. Smith, No. 12-cv-00447-WJM-KLM, (2) Swaggerty v....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.