Stereographic video

Tim wrote:
> Does anybody know how they did this? I think it looks great.
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/zanelowe/2009/04/dizzee_rascal_exclusive.html

dmg wrote:
> I wonder if it can be done with a rig of video cameras to cover the
> 360 degrees.

Yuval Levy wrote:
> dmg wrote:
>
>> I wonder if it can be done with a rig of video cameras to cover the
>> 360 degrees.
>>
> i suspect they filmed with something like a Ladybug. It does the above.
>

>> The frames split, remapped, and stitched, and rejoined into a video.
>>
> probably what they did. and they super-imposed the singer and the people
> after filiming them in studio, separately.
>
> Yuv

On Apr 22, 10:51 am, Dale Beams <drbe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Immersive video, not there yet.
>
> These are great examples of video panoramas.  On a side note to be truely immersive it would need:
>
> 1. A spherical room or VR goggles.  As impressive as this is (and it is impressive) one is still limited to a flat view on a flat screen with a cropped view 4:3(?).  My peripheral vision is about 180 and it's out of my peripheral vision I pick up a lot of information.  The ability to move one's head around while keeping the peripheral vision view is important.
> 2. Truely sterographic (ie, 3D).  True sterographic is filmed with two cameras, about 3-4 inches apart allowing a green/red with 3D or sterographic glasses.  For films this means processing two sets of almost identical film.  With low end video equipment, the cost would be on the processing power of the individual.
> 3. Interactive.  The ability to click within the panorama and get audio feedback.  Ie., seeing and individual with a clickable icon/box and clicking on them to hear the audio from them.  This would require more effort, as it would require a "reporting" team to get audo interaction between two people or about objects within the panorama.  This is great for live events or museams.
> 4. "Live".  This i see as almost impossible, but not quite.  Stitching six different "live" video feeds with small delays would make it truly a immersive experience.  The videographer could be fitted with a earpiece and  then under the control of a web viewer (one at a time) could be directed to interview individuals or inspect objects.  This would be truely live television.
> 5. The implications of "live" panoramas are enourmous.  For example, a team of indivudals with various "light" seeing cameras and and motion detection technologoy (all of which are availabe to us - in linux no less :) ) could walk through hostile situations with "an extra set of eyes" watching what they are watching as a margin of saftey allowing the "human" factor to stay involved.  This would take field agents out of the field, put them behind the saftey of a screen or panoramic room.
>

> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:59:05 -0700

> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereographic video
> To: hugi...@googlegroups.com
>
> video panorama!!
> we have been talking about it on panotoolsNG mailing list
> here are some examples
>

>
> tom_a_sparks
>
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> but instead use OpenDocument File Formats or

>
> From: Leon Moctezuma <dense...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereographic video
> To: hugi...@googlegroups.com
> Received: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009, 12:32 PM
>

>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jim Watters <jwatt...@photocreations.ca> wrote:
> Yuval Levy wrote:
> > dmg wrote:
>
> >> I wonder if it can be done with a rig of video cameras to cover the
> >> 360 degrees.
>
> > i suspect they filmed with something like a Ladybug. It does the above.
>
> Or Immersive Media's Dodeca 2360 camera, that is used by Google street view.
>
> >> The frames split, remapped, and stitched, and rejoined into a video.
>
> > probably what they did. and they super-imposed the singer and the people
> > after filiming them in studio, separately.
>
> > Yuv
>
> I have to agree.  The light on the singer does not change when switching
>
> from evening to night.
>
> Once each frame is stitched to a pano it can be remapped easily.
>
> --
>
> Jim Watters
>
> Yahoo ID: j1vvy ymsgr:sendIM?j1vvy
>
> jwatters @ photocreations . ca
>
> http://photocreations.ca
>
> --
> León Moctezuma
>

>       The new Internet Explorer 8 optimised for Yahoo!7: Faster, Safer, Easier. Get it now.
>

On Apr 27, 1:10 pm, Tom Sharpless <TKSharpl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My 2 cents:
>
> The Dizzy video frames were almost certainly shot in a spherical
> mirror with the lens pointing straight down, which would give the
> "little planet" view without any processing.  Probably from a moving
> car, whose nose and tail have been hidden under the vertical "stage"
> on which the performer performs.
>
> The panos on the GardenGnome site, on the other hand, are true
> panoramic movies, and very impressive.
>
> Now, is anyone yet able to make  3-D (that is, stereoscopic)
> panoramas? or panoramic movies??  That _WOULD_BE_WAY_COOL_
>
> -- Tom
>
> On Apr 22, 10:51 am, Dale Beams <drbe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

<tom_a_spa...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> costing of the hardware is currently the show stopper for us that want
> to start doing panoramic videos

> extract the fisheye/Equirectangular and convert them to flashvideo
> file

> missing is the extract the images from thevideofile
>

>
> On Apr 27, 1:10 pm, Tom Sharpless <TKSharpl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My 2 cents:
>

On May 15, 2:23 pm, Tim <timnug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's another one, you should be able to download the video too:
>

On May 16, 4:44 pm, Dale Beams <drbe...@hotmail.com> wrote: